正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🩺 Community Question: Elon Musk recently said that, based on current human constraints, AI-powered robotics could become better surgeons than the best human surgeons within three years at scale. Do you agree with him? Viewpoint A: Agree. With few great surgeons, slow and costly human training, and unavoidable human...

32,583,863 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Ehsan (base.eth) 的头像
Ehsan (base.eth)8 个月前

Elon Musk’s prediction is directionally correct in terms of capability scaling, but optimistic in terms of timeline and full autonomy AI systems improve through parallel learning, while human surgeons improve sequentially This creates an inevitable crossover point where robotic systems outperform humans in consistency, accuracy, and repeatability however, the limiting factor is not mechanical skill but trusted autonomy medicine operates on verified reliability, not theoretical performance. Even if AI becomes technically superior, the transition depends on validation regulation and human trust AI will first augment surgeons then gradually absorb execution roles, while humans remain the ultimate decision authority.

moris185 的头像
moris1858 个月前

A:✅

MR MUI 的头像
MR MUI8 个月前

I go with option B. AI will massively assist surgeons very soon precision, planning, fatigue reduction but being better than the best humans at scale in 3 years feels optimistic. Surgery isn’t just execution; it’s judgment, accountability, and adapting in messy, high stakes moments. Near term breakthrough in augmentation, not full autonomy.

purnama1607 ⌘ $XAGE 的头像
purnama1607 ⌘ $XAGE8 个月前

B.Precision is the future. While human judgment is key, AI-powered robotics can learn faster and perform with a level of consistency that exceeds human limits. I support this as a vital step toward making high-quality surgical care accessible to everyone

G. 🟥 Arichain 🌶️ 的头像
G. 🟥 Arichain 🌶️7 个月前

Loving how LIFE AI is redefining the future of personalized healthcare tech by blending real human insights with AI and blockchain — real innovation that goes beyond hype! The public testnet airdrop is currently live,offering pathways to LIFE token rewards, exclusive NFTs, + more

Francisco Gonzales WIZO 的头像
Francisco Gonzales WIZO8 个月前

@LifeNetwoek_AI I disagree what Elon said that AI can replace doctors on surgery for me it's all about responsibility, and trust in high-stakes situations, which remain difficult to validate and deploy safely at scale.

Musfat 的头像
Musfat8 个月前

I agree. Surgical excellence today is limited by human bottlenecks years of training, fatigue, variability, and sheer scarcity of top-tier surgeons. AI-powered robotics can learn from millions of procedures, refine precision continuously, and operate without exhaustion or inconsistency. At scale, this isn’t about replacing surgeons overnight it’s about surpassing human limits in repeatable, high-precision tasks where error margins matter most. If validation and oversight keep pace, the breakthrough is closer than many expect.

Ahon Mazino 的头像
Ahon Mazino8 个月前

AI can analyze massive surgical data, learn faster than humans, and operate with precision without fatigue. While oversight is needed, its ability to scale skill consistently makes it likely to surpass human surgeons soon.

CryptoXplor3r 的头像
CryptoXplor3r8 个月前

While AI-powered robotics are rapidly improving, most experts disagree with Elon Musk's three-year timeline for fully autonomous, superior surgical robots at scale.

naol 的头像
naol8 个月前

bullish

Idris Salami 的头像
Idris Salami8 个月前

Health is good

Arash 的头像
Arash8 个月前

Nearly 400,000 injured and disabled people can be a good opportunity for the project to treat the injured through Elon Musk's artificial intelligence and robotics doctor and increase the experience of the project in relation to treatment!@LifeNetwork_AI .

Ehsan (base.eth) 的头像
Ehsan (base.eth)7 个月前

AI-driven robots already excel in closed-loop precision where sensing, prediction, and action are tightly integrated. But surgery is an open-loop biological system, where tissue response, bleeding dynamics, and patient variability can diverge from prediction instantly Surpassing humans in precision is a computational milestone; surpassing them in adaptive biological reasoning remains a harder frontier

jhu lang🌊🔥👨‍🚀 Jackson 🦈/on SuiZetarium 的头像
jhu lang🌊🔥👨‍🚀 Jackson 🦈/on SuiZetarium8 个月前

B. Robotic systems (like the da Vinci) already offer tremor filtration, motion scaling, and 360-degree articulation beyond the human hand's physical limits. AI-enhanced imaging can detect tissue structures and blood vessels invisible to the naked eye, allowing for sub-millimeter

Gidado Abubakar 的头像
Gidado Abubakar8 个月前

@LifeNetwork_AI Well done good job 💯✅

Derrick Zetarium 的头像
Derrick Zetarium7 个月前

Gm

Transz/Building with @YOM_Official 的头像
Transz/Building with @YOM_Official8 个月前

Regulatory reality: Even if the technology works perfectly tomorrow, FDA/EU approval for autonomous surgical systems requires years of clinical trials. We're not just validating hardware—we're validating decision-making in unpredictable biological environments.

Musfat 的头像
Musfat8 个月前

I agree. Surgical excellence today is limited by human bottlenecks years of training, fatigue, variability, and sheer scarcity of top-tier surgeons. AI-powered robotics can learn from millions of procedures, refine precision continuously, and operate without exhaustion or inconsistency. At scale, this isn’t about replacing surgeons overnight it’s about surpassing human limits in repeatable, high-precision tasks where error margins matter most. If validation and oversight keep pace, the breakthrough is closer than many expect. @LifeNetwork_AI

Astaa Fennec 的头像
Astaa Fennec8 个月前

I agree B. AI will massively assist surgeons very soon precision, planning, fatigue reduction but being better than the best humans at scale in 3 years feels optimistic. Surgery needs real-time judgment, handling unexpected complications, and trust—plus safety validation

Ehsan (base.eth) 的头像
Ehsan (base.eth)8 个月前

Elon Musk’s prediction reflects a deeper trend: the collapse of information asymmetry in skill acquisition Surgical expertise historically required decades because knowledge transfer was slow AI removes that bottleneck by compressing collective surgical experience into trainabl

Laras Claudia 的头像
Laras Claudia7 个月前

A. AI systems can continuously learn from vast surgical datasets, reduce variability, and replicate expert-level precision at scale, enabling faster improvement and more consistent outcomes than individual human surgeons.

Oxrbxyz 的头像
Oxrbxyz7 个月前

Agree , With rapid advances in robotics and neural networks, AI could soon perform complex surgeries with stable precision that humans struggle to maintain over long hours.

raja khan | 🚢 的头像
raja khan | 🚢7 个月前

AI and robotics could learn faster and scale surgical skill beyond human limits.

0x.fck 🫎 的头像
0x.fck 🫎7 个月前

gm

Abdullahi Shuaibu Dansabo 的头像
Abdullahi Shuaibu Dansabo8 个月前

Life AI for life

Ahon Mazino 的头像
Ahon Mazino8 个月前

Surgery requires more than technical skill; it demands nuanced judgment, ethical responsibility, and patient trust. These human qualities are difficult for AI to replicate and crucial in high-stakes medical decisions.

Ahon Mazino 的头像
Ahon Mazino7 个月前

Technically, robotic precision may soon surpass the human hand. However, the biggest challenge is not in accuracy, but in the ability to navigate unexpected anomalous situations and moral accountability when systemic failures occur on the operating table.

tsenrj 的头像
tsenrj7 个月前

True—some "inefficiencies" are actually guardrails. Judgment and accountability aren't bugs to optimize away; they're features that emerge from being answerable for outcomes. Hard to code that. It's B for me.

Oxrbxyz 的头像
Oxrbxyz7 个月前

A. I Agree with musk , Imagine a patient in a remote area needing urgent surgery with no doctor available. An AI powered robot steps in, operates with extreme precision, and saves the patient’s life using data from millions of case

Ahon Mazino 的头像
Ahon Mazino7 个月前

Surgery isn’t just precision and data. It requires real-time judgment in unpredictable situations, ethical responsibility, and patient trust. AI may assist or outperform in specific tasks, but fully replacing top surgeons safely at scale is far harder than it sounds.

Abubakar Mohammed 的头像
Abubakar Mohammed7 个月前

Good morning

Ken Wijaya 的头像
Ken Wijaya7 个月前

TGIF and bullish on LIFE AI 🔥

Ci_reng 的头像
Ci_reng7 个月前

AI is indeed good but it is supported by people who remain

相关视频

Elon Musk just said there will be more Optimus robots outperforming the best human surgeons than there are surgeons on Earth. Within three years. Musk: “Three years at scale. Meaning there will be more Optimus robots that are great surgeons than there are all surgeons on Earth.” One robot matching a great surgeon is a milestone. Thousands surpassing them, in every hospital, at once, is the end of surgical scarcity. Those are not the same event. Musk: “It takes a long time for a human to become… and even then, the knowledge is constantly evolving, it’s hard to keep up with everything. Doctors have limited time, they make mistakes.” Fifteen years to produce one great surgeon. One pair of hands at the end of it. An entire career of mastery, bottlenecked because expertise lives inside a single body. Optimus doesn’t train for fifteen years. It learns once and replicates infinitely. The best surgeon alive can save one life at a time. Optimus takes that same precision and removes the ceiling. Every operating room. Every country. Simultaneously. Right now, your survival depends less on what medicine knows than on who happens to be available when you arrive. Geography. Timing. Luck. That’s what sits between you and the best possible care. A child born in rural sub-Saharan Africa and a child born in Manhattan have access to fundamentally different medicine. Not because the knowledge doesn’t exist. Because it’s trapped inside people who can only be in one place at a time. Every person who ever died waiting for a surgeon died while the knowledge to save them existed somewhere on Earth. It just wasn’t in the room. Musk just put a three-year deadline on solving that. We accepted surgical scarcity the way we accepted gravity. As permanent. As a fact of being human, something you endure, not a problem you solve. It was never permanent. It was a limitation no one had the technology or the audacity to remove. The greatest surgeon who ever lived is already dead. Everything they mastered is gone. The entire history of medicine was never defined by what we knew. It was defined by how few hands could do it. We spent ten thousand years building mastery inside things that die, and wondering why it was scarce.

Dustin

41,872 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk just said the quiet part out loud about where AI actually ends up. Musk: “The honest answer for AI and robotics is long term working will be optional.” Long term meaning ten years from now or less. For centuries, human survival has required human labor. That is the oldest equation in civilization. You work or you don’t eat. You work or you lose the shelter. You work or you fall behind everyone who does. Musk is describing the end of that equation entirely. Musk: “If you wanna work you can. Kind of like if you grow vegetables, you can grow vegetables in your garden or you can get them from the store.” The analogy is quieter than the claim deserves. Growing your own vegetables is something people do for joy. For ritual. For the satisfaction of making something with their hands. Not because they would starve otherwise. That is what work becomes. Musk: “It’s extra work to grow your own vegetables but people enjoy the process. That’s gonna be how work is in the future.” When AI and robotics scale to their limit, the cost of physical goods and services collapses toward zero. Labor stops being the mechanism that separates people who survive from people who don’t. What happens to human motivation when survival is no longer the reason to get up? That is the question nobody building this technology has answered. The abundance is coming. The crisis of meaning is coming with it. Musk is describing the greatest liberation in human history. He is also describing the greatest identity crisis our species has ever faced. Both arrive on the same timeline. Ten years or less.

Dustin

102,034 次观看 • 7 个月前