Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

confusing relationship

Kitty Cat Empire

65,635 subscribers

203,245 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

27 Kommentare

Profilbild von Xiaolruc

Xiaolrucvor 1 Jahr

"Now, wait a minute, I'M the leader! I decide who gets cleaned and who does the cleaning."

Profilbild von Peter

Petervor 1 Jahr

Never trust a ginger Tuxedo's are too classy for that trash ;-)

Profilbild von James Roberts

James Robertsvor 1 Jahr

Without comment.

Profilbild von NightlyEggKun

NightlyEggKunvor 1 Jahr

Mommy and daddy may not like each other but we both love you type relationship

Profilbild von William Root

William Rootvor 1 Jahr

Every body loves Raymond?!😈😇

Profilbild von Suzana Martinez

Suzana Martinezvor 1 Jahr

They're very funny...🤯😸😂😂

Profilbild von Mega

Megavor 1 Jahr

Mom daddy and son or daughter

Profilbild von JC3

JC3vor 1 Jahr

What the…?

Profilbild von Peter, Dennis and Samantha 😽😻🐈🐾

Peter, Dennis and Samantha 😽😻🐈🐾vor 1 Jahr

😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😹😻😽

Profilbild von Shivam Jaiswal

Shivam Jaiswalvor 1 Jahr

Me hugging my girlfriend's bestie 😏

Profilbild von Philip Berryman

Philip Berrymanvor 1 Jahr

Whatever you do don’t read their diaries.

Profilbild von brief.intense

brief.intensevor 1 Jahr

Don't try again to imprint my baby !

Profilbild von La mer | El mar | Il mare

La mer | El mar | Il marevor 1 Jahr

Dreiecksbeziehungen bleiben schwierig.

Profilbild von ismail engiz

ismail engizvor 1 Jahr

:)

Profilbild von Geir Corneliussen

Geir Corneliussenvor 1 Jahr

😸

Profilbild von Maria 🦋

Maria 🦋vor 1 Jahr

😂

Profilbild von Jo Veteran

Jo Veteranvor 1 Jahr

Why is it so confusing to say "Lay your hands off my woman!"?

Profilbild von 🍃🌹 تاجر پسر شهرآشوب 🌹🍃

🍃🌹 تاجر پسر شهرآشوب 🌹🍃vor 1 Jahr

😂😂🥰🥰🥰

Profilbild von Silgili

Silgilivor 1 Jahr

The female cat is angry with her husband for some reason. When their child arrives and the father tries to kiss his child, she reacts to him and then kisses the child herself, making it clear that the problem has nothing to do with the kid.

Profilbild von माकडीण

माकडीणvor 1 Jahr

Whos who here..how to solve this luzzle

Profilbild von Mr.Dark

Mr.Darkvor 1 Jahr

@HuoQubot

Profilbild von Vaibhav Rajput

Vaibhav Rajputvor 1 Jahr

Gray and orange are female and siblings. Black and gray are husband-wife

Profilbild von Di Liya

Di Liyavor 1 Jahr

When a cat considers a creature to be its people or subordinates, it will groom its fur.😄

Profilbild von SceneSmith 🎬

SceneSmith 🎬vor 1 Jahr

Cats are strict 😂

Profilbild von Sridhar (Call the spade a spade)

Sridhar (Call the spade a spade)vor 1 Jahr

The blackie may not be the original father..

Profilbild von Jossy

Jossyvor 1 Jahr

That’s his main girlfriend and side chick

Profilbild von まだない

まだないvor 1 Jahr

▼

Ähnliche Videos

Relationship is too confusing. #VRChat

Relationship is too confusing. #VRChat

Specky Spark

13,959 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Two Diddy jurors finally spoke out and said EXACTLY what I been saying: the whole relationship looked messy, confusing, back-and-forth… but “domestic violence wasn’t one of the charges.” That alone explains the split verdict. Juries don’t convict on vibes — they convict on CHARGES.

Two Diddy jurors finally spoke out and said EXACTLY what I been saying: the whole relationship looked messy, confusing, back-and-forth… but “domestic violence wasn’t one of the charges.” That alone explains the split verdict. Juries don’t convict on vibes — they convict on CHARGES.

Mohammed (Moe) Gangat

256,827 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I was 100% prepared to block whoever sent me this recipe... until I tried it. 😭🍌🥩 Meat + Bananas + Taco seasoning. My brain says no, but my taste buds are currently in a confusing committed relationship with this dish. Don’t knock it until you try it. Or do. I’m still processing.

I was 100% prepared to block whoever sent me this recipe... until I tried it. 😭🍌🥩 Meat + Bananas + Taco seasoning. My brain says no, but my taste buds are currently in a confusing committed relationship with this dish. Don’t knock it until you try it. Or do. I’m still processing.

The_Hemp_Hottie🌿🔥

66,991 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“Parang nagtatalo na kung sure na ba akong mahal ko siya or I am just confused. Kasi iba yung feeling kapag kasama ko siya. Parang nakakalito kung masaya ba na kasama ko siya, kung magiging magkaibigan kami or mag-jump into a relationship so confusing siya for me” DAMING MAKAKARELATE NA TAGA-X HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 💁🏻‍♀️ #MarchGVsaShowtime

“Parang nagtatalo na kung sure na ba akong mahal ko siya or I am just confused. Kasi iba yung feeling kapag kasama ko siya. Parang nakakalito kung masaya ba na kasama ko siya, kung magiging magkaibigan kami or mag-jump into a relationship so confusing siya for me” DAMING MAKAKARELATE NA TAGA-X HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA 💁🏻‍♀️ #MarchGVsaShowtime

ALTStarMagic 💫

278,138 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Monogamy Is Not Emotional Ownership Monogamy means sexual exclusivity. It does not mean emotional ownership. Somewhere along the way, we started confusing commitment with control — believing that if someone loves us, we should be their only confidant, their only source of comfort, their whole emotional universe. But that’s not intimacy… that’s pressure. Healthy monogamy isn’t about shrinking your partner’s world down to you. It’s about two full humans choosing each other while still having friendships, passions, and support outside the relationship. Let’s talk about the difference — because emotional monopoly isn’t the same thing as love.

Monogamy Is Not Emotional Ownership Monogamy means sexual exclusivity. It does not mean emotional ownership. Somewhere along the way, we started confusing commitment with control — believing that if someone loves us, we should be their only confidant, their only source of comfort, their whole emotional universe. But that’s not intimacy… that’s pressure. Healthy monogamy isn’t about shrinking your partner’s world down to you. It’s about two full humans choosing each other while still having friendships, passions, and support outside the relationship. Let’s talk about the difference — because emotional monopoly isn’t the same thing as love.

Kate Shelor

25,516 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

British convert Kie, once known online as a prominent Muslim voice, now says he has stepped away from Islam claiming that Jesus has “visited him” over the past few nights in a personal spiritual experience. He describes his relationship with Islam as shifting, saying that texts and Hadiths that once felt grounding now feel confusing and difficult to reconcile. The change marks a major turning point in his public faith journey, drawing attention across social media. The announcement has sparked wider debate about faith identity and religious transformation, with supporters framing it as a powerful spiritual rebirth and critics questioning the claims and timing.

British convert Kie, once known online as a prominent Muslim voice, now says he has stepped away from Islam claiming that Jesus has “visited him” over the past few nights in a personal spiritual experience. He describes his relationship with Islam as shifting, saying that texts and Hadiths that once felt grounding now feel confusing and difficult to reconcile. The change marks a major turning point in his public faith journey, drawing attention across social media. The announcement has sparked wider debate about faith identity and religious transformation, with supporters framing it as a powerful spiritual rebirth and critics questioning the claims and timing.

Danny Roscoe 🟣

106,533 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Kidada, when we listen to “Do for Love” in the context of your relationship with Tupac, it truly feels like he’s speaking directly to you. The message reflects someone who understands that love can be complicated, painful, and confusing, yet he can’t simply turn off his heart. Despite the arguments and struggles, there’s always something that draws him back. Perhaps that’s what makes the song resonate so deeply: “I know this love isn’t easy, but I still care enough to fight for it.” While we can’t say for sure that Tupac wrote the song specifically for you, knowing that you were his fiancée adds even more depth to the emotions behind it. 🕊️❤️ Kidada, Tupac's soulmate, continues to express her enduring love for him, often sharing humorous memories.

Kidada, when we listen to “Do for Love” in the context of your relationship with Tupac, it truly feels like he’s speaking directly to you. The message reflects someone who understands that love can be complicated, painful, and confusing, yet he can’t simply turn off his heart. Despite the arguments and struggles, there’s always something that draws him back. Perhaps that’s what makes the song resonate so deeply: “I know this love isn’t easy, but I still care enough to fight for it.” While we can’t say for sure that Tupac wrote the song specifically for you, knowing that you were his fiancée adds even more depth to the emotions behind it. 🕊️❤️ Kidada, Tupac's soulmate, continues to express her enduring love for him, often sharing humorous memories.

Judith

18,177 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Before I sleep, I wanna point out something that helps in interpreting the connection of Pobmek and Nong Sun 💕 This first episode clearly sets the boundaries between Pobmek and Nong Sun, Solar’s 7-year-old conscience. How? First, Pobmek asks for clarification. Even in a confusing situation, he makes sure he understands who he’s actually talking to. Nong Sun firmly confirms that it’s him, not Solar. Pobmek then asks for Nong Sun’s age. This is important because asking someone’s age helps define how you should interact with them. Once Pobmek learns that Nong Sun is seven years old, it naturally sets the tone for their dynamic and how he approaches him. Then Pobmek describes their relationship as friends. This is a crucial detail. He defines their connection as friendship—nothing more. Not lovers, and not the typical trope of “you’re actually my boyfriend but because of an accident you’ve become like this.” By calling them friends, the story clearly draws a line and establishes the kind of relationship they are meant to have. If you come across anyone mischaracterizing Pobmek, you’re welcome to share this post to help clear the confusion 💕 #LoveYouTeacherSeriesEP1

Before I sleep, I wanna point out something that helps in interpreting the connection of Pobmek and Nong Sun 💕 This first episode clearly sets the boundaries between Pobmek and Nong Sun, Solar’s 7-year-old conscience. How? First, Pobmek asks for clarification. Even in a confusing situation, he makes sure he understands who he’s actually talking to. Nong Sun firmly confirms that it’s him, not Solar. Pobmek then asks for Nong Sun’s age. This is important because asking someone’s age helps define how you should interact with them. Once Pobmek learns that Nong Sun is seven years old, it naturally sets the tone for their dynamic and how he approaches him. Then Pobmek describes their relationship as friends. This is a crucial detail. He defines their connection as friendship—nothing more. Not lovers, and not the typical trope of “you’re actually my boyfriend but because of an accident you’ve become like this.” By calling them friends, the story clearly draws a line and establishes the kind of relationship they are meant to have. If you come across anyone mischaracterizing Pobmek, you’re welcome to share this post to help clear the confusion 💕 #LoveYouTeacherSeriesEP1

⛅️ 𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬.

23,899 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Uranus2324 Movie and Character relationship analysis 🪐🤿 [Note:] I’ll be using the extended version in my analysis for a few reasons. I’ve seen some people say that version felt too “fanservice-y,” which is apparently why they changed it, but I don’t agree. The extended cut includes extra scenes with Lin and her dad that I think are important, plus a few others that actually made this (admittedly confusing at times) movie make a lot more sense to me. So if you find yourself thinking, “Wait, I didn’t see that when I watched it,” you’re probably watching the unextended version. Uranus2324 is a movie loved by many FB fans, but it also sits on that shelf of “I’ll watch it once and probably not again” for a lot of people. With this analysis, I hope you come away with a better understanding of the film. If you’ve seen it before and didn’t quite get it, I really invite you to rewatch it through this lens. This movie admittedly has some editing choices that make it confusing at times. But after sitting down and watching it about five times now, I think I’ve finally figured out which universe is which and who’s who. I’ll explain that part in the solo character breakdowns I’ll be doing at the start. I’ll also be focusing on Kath and Lin’s relationship, but not on intimacy, since the love scene(s?) were cut from the final version. And I’m sorry, but if it’s not in the extended version, I won’t be including it in the analysis. HOWEVER, there is a scene in the WWII universe that’s extremely intimate without a single word of dialogue, and that’s one I’ll be digging into later. I’ll then finally finish on why I think Uranus2324 is a happy/bittersweet ending to ME. #freenbecky #uranus2324 #srchafreen #Beckysangels

Uranus2324 Movie and Character relationship analysis 🪐🤿 [Note:] I’ll be using the extended version in my analysis for a few reasons. I’ve seen some people say that version felt too “fanservice-y,” which is apparently why they changed it, but I don’t agree. The extended cut includes extra scenes with Lin and her dad that I think are important, plus a few others that actually made this (admittedly confusing at times) movie make a lot more sense to me. So if you find yourself thinking, “Wait, I didn’t see that when I watched it,” you’re probably watching the unextended version. Uranus2324 is a movie loved by many FB fans, but it also sits on that shelf of “I’ll watch it once and probably not again” for a lot of people. With this analysis, I hope you come away with a better understanding of the film. If you’ve seen it before and didn’t quite get it, I really invite you to rewatch it through this lens. This movie admittedly has some editing choices that make it confusing at times. But after sitting down and watching it about five times now, I think I’ve finally figured out which universe is which and who’s who. I’ll explain that part in the solo character breakdowns I’ll be doing at the start. I’ll also be focusing on Kath and Lin’s relationship, but not on intimacy, since the love scene(s?) were cut from the final version. And I’m sorry, but if it’s not in the extended version, I won’t be including it in the analysis. HOWEVER, there is a scene in the WWII universe that’s extremely intimate without a single word of dialogue, and that’s one I’ll be digging into later. I’ll then finally finish on why I think Uranus2324 is a happy/bittersweet ending to ME. #freenbecky #uranus2324 #srchafreen #Beckysangels

juno🥑

17,668 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Rosamund Pike says raising two sons is terribly confusing and it forced her to become someone she never thought she'd be "I always imagined myself having a daughter. You could say there's a failure that I haven't had a daughter." "There's been this mother-daughter thing handed down in my family and I don't have that." "I love the relationship between brothers. They fight each other, hurt each other, and then they're laughing, I have no idea what's going on." "I love that it's pushing me to be adventurous, because I'm quite a coward really, and I like to play brave people because I like to pretend that I'm not." "I'm constantly in battle with my own fear, and I'm always pushing myself because I hate the part of myself that's fearful." "I'm in a family of adventurers who do extreme sports, kitesurfing, skiing, scuba diving, football, I'd never touched a ball with my feet till I had sons. They've taught me so much."

Rosamund Pike says raising two sons is terribly confusing and it forced her to become someone she never thought she'd be "I always imagined myself having a daughter. You could say there's a failure that I haven't had a daughter." "There's been this mother-daughter thing handed down in my family and I don't have that." "I love the relationship between brothers. They fight each other, hurt each other, and then they're laughing, I have no idea what's going on." "I love that it's pushing me to be adventurous, because I'm quite a coward really, and I like to play brave people because I like to pretend that I'm not." "I'm constantly in battle with my own fear, and I'm always pushing myself because I hate the part of myself that's fearful." "I'm in a family of adventurers who do extreme sports, kitesurfing, skiing, scuba diving, football, I'd never touched a ball with my feet till I had sons. They've taught me so much."

crest.

2,237,406 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

God never commanded us through His inspired written word to elevate Mary above others who learned from Jesus in the first century! The scripture says that Christians become adopted children of God, never of Jesus’s earthly mother! What’s even more confusing is how in Roman Catholicism not only do they say Mary is the Christians mother but also the holy Roman church is their mother too. So how many mothers does the catholic have? ⭐️ Eager to be a better discipler and student of the Word or just grow in your relationship with God? I believe this book by book Bible summary will encourage you and bring you comfort found in the scriptures. It is not a course nor does it cost anything! Come journey with me on this summary through the entire Bible, from a Jewish perspective in chronological order. 👉🏼 Just comment “SUMMARY” below and I’ll send you the details to get started today!! #bible #christianlife #theology #christianapologetics

God never commanded us through His inspired written word to elevate Mary above others who learned from Jesus in the first century! The scripture says that Christians become adopted children of God, never of Jesus’s earthly mother! What’s even more confusing is how in Roman Catholicism not only do they say Mary is the Christians mother but also the holy Roman church is their mother too. So how many mothers does the catholic have? ⭐️ Eager to be a better discipler and student of the Word or just grow in your relationship with God? I believe this book by book Bible summary will encourage you and bring you comfort found in the scriptures. It is not a course nor does it cost anything! Come journey with me on this summary through the entire Bible, from a Jewish perspective in chronological order. 👉🏼 Just comment “SUMMARY” below and I’ll send you the details to get started today!! #bible #christianlife #theology #christianapologetics

The Bible In Context

26,736 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Could buying a house be a mistake? I have been trying to better comprehend how to make smarter decisions with my money. Not just how to earn more, but how to actually use it properly over time because the truth is that most of us were never really taught this stuff. So to help me understand it, Finance Guru Ben Felix joins me on The Diary Of A CEO today. Ben is a portfolio manager for PWL Capital (wealth management firm and multi-family office) who focuses on ‘evidence-based investing’ that debunks financial traps and explains the relationship between money and well-being. We spoke about how most people approach money with assumptions that they have never really questioned. Things like buying a house, chasing higher returns, or believing that more money will automatically improve their lives. I have always found money confusing. Not because the information is not out there, but because there is too much of it and most of it says something different. This episode strips it back and should help you understand what actually matters…

Could buying a house be a mistake? I have been trying to better comprehend how to make smarter decisions with my money. Not just how to earn more, but how to actually use it properly over time because the truth is that most of us were never really taught this stuff. So to help me understand it, Finance Guru Ben Felix joins me on The Diary Of A CEO today. Ben is a portfolio manager for PWL Capital (wealth management firm and multi-family office) who focuses on ‘evidence-based investing’ that debunks financial traps and explains the relationship between money and well-being. We spoke about how most people approach money with assumptions that they have never really questioned. Things like buying a house, chasing higher returns, or believing that more money will automatically improve their lives. I have always found money confusing. Not because the information is not out there, but because there is too much of it and most of it says something different. This episode strips it back and should help you understand what actually matters…

Steven Bartlett

41,994 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

If I give you a glass of water and put poison in it… Then add sugar… Does the sugar remove the poison? No. It may change the taste. It may make it easier to swallow. But the damage is still there. This is how trauma can work in relationships. Someone hurts you. Disrespects you. Betrays you. Breaks your trust. Then suddenly, they become loving again. They apologise. Buy you gifts. Give you affection. Create beautiful memories. And you start wondering whether the good moments cancel out the bad ones. They don’t. Kindness after cruelty doesn’t automatically erase the damage. An apology without changed behaviour doesn’t remove the wound. Love does not neutralise repeated harm. That’s why toxic relationships can be so confusing. The sweetness makes you question the poison. You remember the beautiful moments and convince yourself that maybe things aren’t really that bad. But healing begins when you stop asking whether there was love… And start asking whether the relationship was safe. Because something can contain beautiful moments and still be damaging to you. Sugar may change the taste. But it doesn’t remove the poison.

If I give you a glass of water and put poison in it… Then add sugar… Does the sugar remove the poison? No. It may change the taste. It may make it easier to swallow. But the damage is still there. This is how trauma can work in relationships. Someone hurts you. Disrespects you. Betrays you. Breaks your trust. Then suddenly, they become loving again. They apologise. Buy you gifts. Give you affection. Create beautiful memories. And you start wondering whether the good moments cancel out the bad ones. They don’t. Kindness after cruelty doesn’t automatically erase the damage. An apology without changed behaviour doesn’t remove the wound. Love does not neutralise repeated harm. That’s why toxic relationships can be so confusing. The sweetness makes you question the poison. You remember the beautiful moments and convince yourself that maybe things aren’t really that bad. But healing begins when you stop asking whether there was love… And start asking whether the relationship was safe. Because something can contain beautiful moments and still be damaging to you. Sugar may change the taste. But it doesn’t remove the poison.

Success Minded

13,365 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

JACKIE VS LIL JACKIE (Basketball Wives) You can’t push your momma & expect not to get swung on 😭my momma would’ve did the exact same thing Then you go downstairs holding your pinky up like you ready for a pinky promise , to show this lil bruise 😂 like your name is PINKY DOLL & then tell half the story like you ain’t push her . Jackie & Lil Jackie needs IYANLA FIX MY LIFE and invite the whole family : Takari , Lil Doug , Big Doug , the 🏀 & the basketball team lmao Also a rhetorical question is not a “yes” or “no” answer lmfaooo . Lil Jackie & Jackie are literally the same person, but Jackie had to show her who the teacher was lmao . Brittany is a ball of confusion. Went to them people saying “people get trying me” , like you not inserting yourself into other people business . You more UPSET w/ Jackie than her own daughter . Projecting like crazy & you ain’t tell them people you been cussing and fighting in your hijab , Onijah Robinson . Denise is literally a white crayon on this show & stop calling them the BIG 3 . More like the 3 blind mice Evelyn hate when people talk about her kid , but you keep talking about Jackie and Chantell relationship. It’s so confusing to me . #basketballwives #vh1 #isaiahjaay #bbwla

JACKIE VS LIL JACKIE (Basketball Wives) You can’t push your momma & expect not to get swung on 😭my momma would’ve did the exact same thing Then you go downstairs holding your pinky up like you ready for a pinky promise , to show this lil bruise 😂 like your name is PINKY DOLL & then tell half the story like you ain’t push her . Jackie & Lil Jackie needs IYANLA FIX MY LIFE and invite the whole family : Takari , Lil Doug , Big Doug , the 🏀 & the basketball team lmao Also a rhetorical question is not a “yes” or “no” answer lmfaooo . Lil Jackie & Jackie are literally the same person, but Jackie had to show her who the teacher was lmao . Brittany is a ball of confusion. Went to them people saying “people get trying me” , like you not inserting yourself into other people business . You more UPSET w/ Jackie than her own daughter . Projecting like crazy & you ain’t tell them people you been cussing and fighting in your hijab , Onijah Robinson . Denise is literally a white crayon on this show & stop calling them the BIG 3 . More like the 3 blind mice Evelyn hate when people talk about her kid , but you keep talking about Jackie and Chantell relationship. It’s so confusing to me . #basketballwives #vh1 #isaiahjaay #bbwla

3/12 🎈

177,032 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

People will call you cold the moment your peace stops being convenient for them. They were comfortable with the version of you that reacted to everything. The version that explained himself. Chased people. Fixed every misunderstanding. Replayed every argument at 2 AM wondering what he should have said differently. Then something changes. You realize not every relationship deserves CPR. Not every misunderstanding deserves a courtroom. Not every insult deserves a response. And not every person walking away needs to be chased down the street. That’s when life gets strangely quiet. People leave and you let them. Someone misunderstands you and you sleep anyway. A friendship becomes one-sided and instead of begging for the old version back, you accept what it became. You stop confusing loneliness with solitude. You stop treating every ending like a mystery that needs solving. And people who knew the anxious version of you may think you’ve become detached. Maybe you have. But there is a kind of detachment that isn’t bitterness. It’s wisdom. It’s realizing how much of your suffering came from trying to control things that were never yours to control. Other people’s opinions. Other people’s loyalty. Other people’s choices. The past. At some point, peace stops looking like getting everything you wanted. It starts looking like needing fewer things to go your way. That’s real freedom. You don’t become peaceful when life stops giving you battles. You become peaceful when you finally learn which ones deserve your blood.

People will call you cold the moment your peace stops being convenient for them. They were comfortable with the version of you that reacted to everything. The version that explained himself. Chased people. Fixed every misunderstanding. Replayed every argument at 2 AM wondering what he should have said differently. Then something changes. You realize not every relationship deserves CPR. Not every misunderstanding deserves a courtroom. Not every insult deserves a response. And not every person walking away needs to be chased down the street. That’s when life gets strangely quiet. People leave and you let them. Someone misunderstands you and you sleep anyway. A friendship becomes one-sided and instead of begging for the old version back, you accept what it became. You stop confusing loneliness with solitude. You stop treating every ending like a mystery that needs solving. And people who knew the anxious version of you may think you’ve become detached. Maybe you have. But there is a kind of detachment that isn’t bitterness. It’s wisdom. It’s realizing how much of your suffering came from trying to control things that were never yours to control. Other people’s opinions. Other people’s loyalty. Other people’s choices. The past. At some point, peace stops looking like getting everything you wanted. It starts looking like needing fewer things to go your way. That’s real freedom. You don’t become peaceful when life stops giving you battles. You become peaceful when you finally learn which ones deserve your blood.

Success Minded

23,938 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 IVERMECTIN 1.87% PASTE EXPLAINED: WHAT DO THE 25 WEIGHT MARKINGS ACTUALLY MEAN? At first glance, a 1.87% Ivermectin paste tube can look surprisingly complicated. A dosage ring. Weight markings. 25 increments. A 1,250 pound scale. And a number like 1.87% that can seem confusing if you've never broken down the label. This video walks through the numbers step by step. 💊 START WITH THE LABEL The tube shown contains: • 1.87% Ivermectin • 6.08 grams of paste The syringe is marked up to 1,250 pounds, with 25 increments. That means: 25 × 50 pounds = 1,250 pounds So each marking represents 50 pounds of labeled animal weight. 🔢 WHAT DOES 1.87% MEAN? The video converts the concentration into a much easier number. 1.87% = 0.0187 grams of Ivermectin per gram of paste Convert grams to milligrams: 18.7 mg of Ivermectin per gram of paste Now multiply that by the 6.08 grams of paste in the tube: 6.08 × 18.7 = 113.7 mg So the calculation gives approximately: 113.7 mg of Ivermectin per tube. ⚙️ NOW THE 25 MARKINGS MAKE SENSE The tube contains approximately 113.7 mg of Ivermectin and has 25 labeled increments. So: 113.7 ÷ 25 = approximately 4.55 mg per increment. The video then demonstrates how the dosage ring works. You move the ring between the notches, with each notch corresponding to another 50 pounds on the veterinary weight scale, and lock it into place before dispensing the paste. 👀 WHY IS THIS INTERESTING? Because the label combines several different numbers: • 1.87% concentration • 6.08 g total paste • 1,250 lb maximum labeled weight • 25 increments • 50 lb per increment Once the mathematics is broken down, the relationship between all those numbers becomes much easier to understand. The video also demonstrates what a selected amount of paste looks like physically, using a pencil eraser as a rough visual comparison. The main takeaway isn't simply the number on the tube. It's understanding how concentration, total paste weight and the weight markings relate to one another. Once you understand the concentration, total paste weight and the 25 weight markings, the entire label becomes much easier to read. That's the real takeaway from this breakdown: turning a confusing looking Ivermectin paste label into numbers that are easy to follow. 📌 Save this Ivermectin paste breakdown for reference. 🔄 Repost if the 1.87% concentration, 25 weight markings and dosage ring finally make sense. 💊 Looking for Ivermectin or other repurposed medicines? Explore RXMEDS.STORE, with worldwide delivery. #Ivermectin #IvermectinPaste #IvermectinResearch #RepurposedMedicine #HealthResearch #RxMeds

🚨 IVERMECTIN 1.87% PASTE EXPLAINED: WHAT DO THE 25 WEIGHT MARKINGS ACTUALLY MEAN? At first glance, a 1.87% Ivermectin paste tube can look surprisingly complicated. A dosage ring. Weight markings. 25 increments. A 1,250 pound scale. And a number like 1.87% that can seem confusing if you've never broken down the label. This video walks through the numbers step by step. 💊 START WITH THE LABEL The tube shown contains: • 1.87% Ivermectin • 6.08 grams of paste The syringe is marked up to 1,250 pounds, with 25 increments. That means: 25 × 50 pounds = 1,250 pounds So each marking represents 50 pounds of labeled animal weight. 🔢 WHAT DOES 1.87% MEAN? The video converts the concentration into a much easier number. 1.87% = 0.0187 grams of Ivermectin per gram of paste Convert grams to milligrams: 18.7 mg of Ivermectin per gram of paste Now multiply that by the 6.08 grams of paste in the tube: 6.08 × 18.7 = 113.7 mg So the calculation gives approximately: 113.7 mg of Ivermectin per tube. ⚙️ NOW THE 25 MARKINGS MAKE SENSE The tube contains approximately 113.7 mg of Ivermectin and has 25 labeled increments. So: 113.7 ÷ 25 = approximately 4.55 mg per increment. The video then demonstrates how the dosage ring works. You move the ring between the notches, with each notch corresponding to another 50 pounds on the veterinary weight scale, and lock it into place before dispensing the paste. 👀 WHY IS THIS INTERESTING? Because the label combines several different numbers: • 1.87% concentration • 6.08 g total paste • 1,250 lb maximum labeled weight • 25 increments • 50 lb per increment Once the mathematics is broken down, the relationship between all those numbers becomes much easier to understand. The video also demonstrates what a selected amount of paste looks like physically, using a pencil eraser as a rough visual comparison. The main takeaway isn't simply the number on the tube. It's understanding how concentration, total paste weight and the weight markings relate to one another. Once you understand the concentration, total paste weight and the 25 weight markings, the entire label becomes much easier to read. That's the real takeaway from this breakdown: turning a confusing looking Ivermectin paste label into numbers that are easy to follow. 📌 Save this Ivermectin paste breakdown for reference. 🔄 Repost if the 1.87% concentration, 25 weight markings and dosage ring finally make sense. 💊 Looking for Ivermectin or other repurposed medicines? Explore RXMEDS.STORE, with worldwide delivery. #Ivermectin #IvermectinPaste #IvermectinResearch #RepurposedMedicine #HealthResearch #RxMeds

RXMEDS.STORE

72,449 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Carney stumbles as he tries to define what makes Canada thrive The Rebel Roundtable panel looks at Prime Minister Carney's attempt at defining what makes Canada special and how anti-Americanism is hurting our relationship with our most important ally. “Canada doesn't live because of the United States,” Mark Carney said, rebuffing assertions from U.S. President Donald Trump. “Canada thrives because we are Canadian,” the prime minister followed up. Carney's unclear statement drew parallels to his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, when he struggled to define what makes Canadians unique — only to suggest Canadians “most easily” define themselves by saying “we are not American.” On Friday's Rebel Roundtable livestream, hosts David Menzies and Alexandra Lavoie, along with guests Tamara Lich 🇨🇦 and Rod Giltaca, lambasted the prime minister for his lame answer and his inability to strengthen ties with Canada's closest neighbour. “I know it's very fashionable in certain circles to be anti-Trump and to embrace Trump Derangement Syndrome, but the president is right: we do depend on the U.S.,” David said. “Militarily, this has been the reason we've been so delinquent on spending on our military; we know if Canada were ever to be invaded by anyone, who would come to our defence? Well, it would be the United States of America.” Rod Giltaca, CEO of the Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights, called Carney's words “meaningless,” adding it's a strategy deployed by the PM to “keep confusing the 'Elbows Up' crowd.” Rod also touched on his own personal decline in patriotism over the last decade, wish was ushered in by Trudeau branding Canada as the first post-national state. Anti-American sentiments have been building in the country, he said, “and all of it is made possible by the blanket of protection provided to us by the Americans for the last 40 years.” Canada poses a “strategic liability” to the U.S., the CCFR/CCDAF CEO continued, noting the Americans would not allow an adversary to invade their northern neighbours. For many Liberals, Trump “is obviously Mussolini or Hitler,” Rod said, adding many also hold the view that “we're better than the Americans anyway,” which leads to these same people questioning why Canada needs its alliance with the U.S. “You need the states for your economy; you need the states for your military defence; you need the states for a lot of different things, and no partnership or collection of partnerships is going to replace that relationship,” he said.

Carney stumbles as he tries to define what makes Canada thrive The Rebel Roundtable panel looks at Prime Minister Carney's attempt at defining what makes Canada special and how anti-Americanism is hurting our relationship with our most important ally. “Canada doesn't live because of the United States,” Mark Carney said, rebuffing assertions from U.S. President Donald Trump. “Canada thrives because we are Canadian,” the prime minister followed up. Carney's unclear statement drew parallels to his predecessor, Justin Trudeau, when he struggled to define what makes Canadians unique — only to suggest Canadians “most easily” define themselves by saying “we are not American.” On Friday's Rebel Roundtable livestream, hosts David Menzies and Alexandra Lavoie, along with guests Tamara Lich 🇨🇦 and Rod Giltaca, lambasted the prime minister for his lame answer and his inability to strengthen ties with Canada's closest neighbour. “I know it's very fashionable in certain circles to be anti-Trump and to embrace Trump Derangement Syndrome, but the president is right: we do depend on the U.S.,” David said. “Militarily, this has been the reason we've been so delinquent on spending on our military; we know if Canada were ever to be invaded by anyone, who would come to our defence? Well, it would be the United States of America.” Rod Giltaca, CEO of the Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights, called Carney's words “meaningless,” adding it's a strategy deployed by the PM to “keep confusing the 'Elbows Up' crowd.” Rod also touched on his own personal decline in patriotism over the last decade, wish was ushered in by Trudeau branding Canada as the first post-national state. Anti-American sentiments have been building in the country, he said, “and all of it is made possible by the blanket of protection provided to us by the Americans for the last 40 years.” Canada poses a “strategic liability” to the U.S., the CCFR/CCDAF CEO continued, noting the Americans would not allow an adversary to invade their northern neighbours. For many Liberals, Trump “is obviously Mussolini or Hitler,” Rod said, adding many also hold the view that “we're better than the Americans anyway,” which leads to these same people questioning why Canada needs its alliance with the U.S. “You need the states for your economy; you need the states for your military defence; you need the states for a lot of different things, and no partnership or collection of partnerships is going to replace that relationship,” he said.

Rebel News

11,328 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The Matrix is not a documentary. It is not a leaked manual. It is not proof that you live in a pod, that the world is fake, that nothing matters. That is the trap the story itself warns you about: Confusing the map for the territory, the metaphor for the mechanism. The true reality: The Matrix is a mirror disguised as a movie. It is Plato's cave in leather. It is the Gnostic dream in green code. It is the oldest story humanity tells: That you are asleep, that the world you take for granted is a consensus trance, and that waking is possible, but not free. The "matrix" is not a machine. It is a set of agreements. It is the inherited assumptions you never chose: That you are your job, your bank balance, your diagnosis, your past. That happiness is purchased. That time is scarce. That you are separate from the earth, from each other, from Source. These are not truths. They are programs. And they run quietly, in the background, until you notice them. There are levels. The obvious one: Media, money, empire, the stories told to keep you consuming and afraid. The subtler one: Language itself. The words you think in shape what you can perceive. The deepest one: The illusion of the separate self, the belief that there is someone in here looking out at a world out there. That is the root program. Dissolve it, and the rest loosens. But here is the hard teaching the film got right: You cannot unplug someone by force. The red pill is offered, never imposed. Free will is the architecture. And the red pill is not escape. It is responsibility. Neo does not wake up into paradise. He wakes up into a ruined world, a hard road, and a body that hurts. Freedom is not comfort. It is agency. And the film got something else right: The Matrix is not only out there. It is in you. Your habits. Your fears. Your addictions to certainty and outrage. Your need to be right. The agents are not only suits chasing you. They are the thoughts that police your aliveness. The prison is internal before it is external. That is why no external savior can free you. The One is not a person you wait for. It is what you are when you stop outsourcing your authority. There is no spoon. There is no fixed reality to fight. There is relationship, attention, and choice. You do not destroy the illusion. You stop being ruled by it. You bend, not the world, but your relationship to it. That is the bending of the spoon. Beware the counterfeit awakening. There are those who will sell you the red pill as a product, a course, a supplement, a secret doctrine, a political savior. That is the Matrix wearing a red coat. True waking does not make you superior. It makes you humble, kind, and unafraid. It does not make you hate the sleepers. It makes you patient with them, because you remember you were one. The deepest truth: The Matrix is not a place you escape. It is a dream you stop confusing with the whole of yourself. You are not the character. You are not even the actor. You are the awareness in which the whole film plays. When you know that, you can walk inside the illusion without being owned by it, free, present, and quietly sovereign. So take the red pill. But understand what it is: Not a fact, but a commitment. Not information, but transformation. Not escape from the world, but awakening within it. The door has always been open. You were just looking for it in the wrong place.

The Matrix is not a documentary. It is not a leaked manual. It is not proof that you live in a pod, that the world is fake, that nothing matters. That is the trap the story itself warns you about: Confusing the map for the territory, the metaphor for the mechanism. The true reality: The Matrix is a mirror disguised as a movie. It is Plato's cave in leather. It is the Gnostic dream in green code. It is the oldest story humanity tells: That you are asleep, that the world you take for granted is a consensus trance, and that waking is possible, but not free. The "matrix" is not a machine. It is a set of agreements. It is the inherited assumptions you never chose: That you are your job, your bank balance, your diagnosis, your past. That happiness is purchased. That time is scarce. That you are separate from the earth, from each other, from Source. These are not truths. They are programs. And they run quietly, in the background, until you notice them. There are levels. The obvious one: Media, money, empire, the stories told to keep you consuming and afraid. The subtler one: Language itself. The words you think in shape what you can perceive. The deepest one: The illusion of the separate self, the belief that there is someone in here looking out at a world out there. That is the root program. Dissolve it, and the rest loosens. But here is the hard teaching the film got right: You cannot unplug someone by force. The red pill is offered, never imposed. Free will is the architecture. And the red pill is not escape. It is responsibility. Neo does not wake up into paradise. He wakes up into a ruined world, a hard road, and a body that hurts. Freedom is not comfort. It is agency. And the film got something else right: The Matrix is not only out there. It is in you. Your habits. Your fears. Your addictions to certainty and outrage. Your need to be right. The agents are not only suits chasing you. They are the thoughts that police your aliveness. The prison is internal before it is external. That is why no external savior can free you. The One is not a person you wait for. It is what you are when you stop outsourcing your authority. There is no spoon. There is no fixed reality to fight. There is relationship, attention, and choice. You do not destroy the illusion. You stop being ruled by it. You bend, not the world, but your relationship to it. That is the bending of the spoon. Beware the counterfeit awakening. There are those who will sell you the red pill as a product, a course, a supplement, a secret doctrine, a political savior. That is the Matrix wearing a red coat. True waking does not make you superior. It makes you humble, kind, and unafraid. It does not make you hate the sleepers. It makes you patient with them, because you remember you were one. The deepest truth: The Matrix is not a place you escape. It is a dream you stop confusing with the whole of yourself. You are not the character. You are not even the actor. You are the awareness in which the whole film plays. When you know that, you can walk inside the illusion without being owned by it, free, present, and quietly sovereign. So take the red pill. But understand what it is: Not a fact, but a commitment. Not information, but transformation. Not escape from the world, but awakening within it. The door has always been open. You were just looking for it in the wrong place.

Ra 𐦝

54,782 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Wizarab, this argument collapsed before it even left your keyboard. You’re trying to turn “where were you born?” into the final test of who may speak about Lagos, while conveniently forgetting that Yoruba identity did not begin with Nigeria’s 36-state map. Ijebu, Egba, Awori, Ekiti, Oyo, Ondo and other Yoruba communities have distinct hometowns and histories, but they also share a wider Yoruba cultural and linguistic civilization. Being from Ijebu does not magically make somebody a foreigner to Yoruba affairs because a colonial or post-colonial boundary later placed Ijebu inside Ogun State. And please stop confusing being Yoruba with being an indigenous Lagosian. They are not exactly the same claim. A person can be Yoruba without claiming Awori/Lagos indigeneity. Likewise, Lagos indigenes are perfectly entitled to defend their own history. But your funniest contradiction is this: you want to interrogate everybody else’s birthplace, childhood street and ancestral village while behaving as though Owerre-Olubor suddenly disappeared from the map because Lagos politics gives you better engagement. If birthplace is now your supreme political qualification, then apply your own examination to yourself first. Where were you born? Where did you grow up? Where are your ancestral roots? And why does Lagos occupy more space in your political commentary than the community you actually trace yourself to? That is the part you keep dodging. Yoruba people can argue fiercely among themselves—Ijebu, Egba, Ekiti, Oyo, Ondo, Lagos—and still understand that state boundaries do not automatically erase a larger cultural relationship. That does NOT mean every Yoruba person can claim Lagos indigeneity. It simply means your childish “go back to your region” formula does not explain Yoruba history. And dragging other ethnic groups into it will not rescue the argument either. Every society has internal disputes and discrimination; nobody should pretend otherwise. The standard should be simple: defend your heritage without inventing a purity test for everybody else. So, Mr. Geography Examiner, before you start issuing Lagos deportation orders from Twitter, kindly locate Owerre-Olubor on your own map first. You cannot spend all day inside another man’s compound shouting, “Who invited you here?” while your own compound is asking whether you still remember the road home. 😂 Speak about Lagos all you want. But don’t manufacture a citizenship test you yourself cannot survive.

Wizarab, this argument collapsed before it even left your keyboard. You’re trying to turn “where were you born?” into the final test of who may speak about Lagos, while conveniently forgetting that Yoruba identity did not begin with Nigeria’s 36-state map. Ijebu, Egba, Awori, Ekiti, Oyo, Ondo and other Yoruba communities have distinct hometowns and histories, but they also share a wider Yoruba cultural and linguistic civilization. Being from Ijebu does not magically make somebody a foreigner to Yoruba affairs because a colonial or post-colonial boundary later placed Ijebu inside Ogun State. And please stop confusing being Yoruba with being an indigenous Lagosian. They are not exactly the same claim. A person can be Yoruba without claiming Awori/Lagos indigeneity. Likewise, Lagos indigenes are perfectly entitled to defend their own history. But your funniest contradiction is this: you want to interrogate everybody else’s birthplace, childhood street and ancestral village while behaving as though Owerre-Olubor suddenly disappeared from the map because Lagos politics gives you better engagement. If birthplace is now your supreme political qualification, then apply your own examination to yourself first. Where were you born? Where did you grow up? Where are your ancestral roots? And why does Lagos occupy more space in your political commentary than the community you actually trace yourself to? That is the part you keep dodging. Yoruba people can argue fiercely among themselves—Ijebu, Egba, Ekiti, Oyo, Ondo, Lagos—and still understand that state boundaries do not automatically erase a larger cultural relationship. That does NOT mean every Yoruba person can claim Lagos indigeneity. It simply means your childish “go back to your region” formula does not explain Yoruba history. And dragging other ethnic groups into it will not rescue the argument either. Every society has internal disputes and discrimination; nobody should pretend otherwise. The standard should be simple: defend your heritage without inventing a purity test for everybody else. So, Mr. Geography Examiner, before you start issuing Lagos deportation orders from Twitter, kindly locate Owerre-Olubor on your own map first. You cannot spend all day inside another man’s compound shouting, “Who invited you here?” while your own compound is asking whether you still remember the road home. 😂 Speak about Lagos all you want. But don’t manufacture a citizenship test you yourself cannot survive.

THE TROJAN BEAST

18,169 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

THE DEADLY ATTRACTION | MARGO & CALLIE — THE HUNTING WIVES (2025) WHEN YOUR BEST FRIEND WITH BENEFITS FORGETS SHE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO BE FOREVER Let’s talk about Margo and Callie. Because apparently friendship, marriage, sex, jealousy and firearms were not enough separate complications. They had to put them all in the same relationship. Margo Banks likes control. Her house. Her husband. Her social circle. Her secrets. And, for a while, Callie. Callie is not some random affair Margo picked up between fundraisers. She is history. Best friend. Partner in crime. Occasional lover. The woman standing closest to Margo before Sophie O’Neil ever arrives in Texas. Which makes Sophie’s arrival extremely inconvenient. Callie knows the rules. She knows Margo is married. She knows they can never really be together. She knows their relationship exists in that very comfortable little space between “friendship” and “please do not ask follow-up questions.” And yet knowing the rules is not the same thing as enjoying them. Especially when Margo starts changing them. Margo ends their affair when Jed decides to run for governor. Too much scrutiny. Too many secrets. Too many people who might start digging. Very sensible. Callie takes it exactly as well as a woman in love with her married best friend usually does. Which is to say: not especially. Because Callie’s problem is not that she misunderstands Margo. It is that she understands her perfectly and still wants more. Margo can say they will always be friends. Callie hears what she is losing. Then Sophie arrives. New. Curious. Captivated. And most dangerously of all? Margo is fascinated right back. Suddenly Callie is no longer merely sharing Margo with Jed. She is watching someone else take the place she thought belonged to her. That is where the attraction becomes deadly. Callie’s loyalty starts curdling into possession. She investigates Sophie. She watches. She resents. She keeps telling herself she is protecting Margo. Sometimes she even is. When Jill points a gun at Margo, Callie does not hesitate. She shoots Jill first. Romantic. In a very Texas way. But protecting someone and wanting to own your place in their life are not the same thing. And Callie keeps confusing them. By the finale, she finally says the quiet part out loud. She wants Margo back. Not divorced. Not together together. Just back to what they were. Margo refuses. Not because of Jed. Not because of the campaign. Because something has changed. She simply does not feel the same anymore. That should probably be the end. Naturally, it isn’t. Because Callie has also been trying to hurt Margo. Those photos? The blackmail? Callie. A “low moment,” apparently. Nothing says healthy attachment like weaponizing evidence because your best friend with benefits broke your heart. And the beautiful disaster of them is that both things are true at once. Callie really does love Margo. Callie really would protect her. Callie really would hurt her. Sometimes in the same week. Margo knows Callie is loyal. What she underestimates is how dangerous loyalty becomes when it feels replaced. Some deadly attractions burn because two people cannot stay away from each other. Margo and Callie? They burn because one woman thinks history should guarantee her a place in the future. And the other has already moved on. 💋

THE DEADLY ATTRACTION | MARGO & CALLIE — THE HUNTING WIVES (2025) WHEN YOUR BEST FRIEND WITH BENEFITS FORGETS SHE WAS NEVER SUPPOSED TO BE FOREVER Let’s talk about Margo and Callie. Because apparently friendship, marriage, sex, jealousy and firearms were not enough separate complications. They had to put them all in the same relationship. Margo Banks likes control. Her house. Her husband. Her social circle. Her secrets. And, for a while, Callie. Callie is not some random affair Margo picked up between fundraisers. She is history. Best friend. Partner in crime. Occasional lover. The woman standing closest to Margo before Sophie O’Neil ever arrives in Texas. Which makes Sophie’s arrival extremely inconvenient. Callie knows the rules. She knows Margo is married. She knows they can never really be together. She knows their relationship exists in that very comfortable little space between “friendship” and “please do not ask follow-up questions.” And yet knowing the rules is not the same thing as enjoying them. Especially when Margo starts changing them. Margo ends their affair when Jed decides to run for governor. Too much scrutiny. Too many secrets. Too many people who might start digging. Very sensible. Callie takes it exactly as well as a woman in love with her married best friend usually does. Which is to say: not especially. Because Callie’s problem is not that she misunderstands Margo. It is that she understands her perfectly and still wants more. Margo can say they will always be friends. Callie hears what she is losing. Then Sophie arrives. New. Curious. Captivated. And most dangerously of all? Margo is fascinated right back. Suddenly Callie is no longer merely sharing Margo with Jed. She is watching someone else take the place she thought belonged to her. That is where the attraction becomes deadly. Callie’s loyalty starts curdling into possession. She investigates Sophie. She watches. She resents. She keeps telling herself she is protecting Margo. Sometimes she even is. When Jill points a gun at Margo, Callie does not hesitate. She shoots Jill first. Romantic. In a very Texas way. But protecting someone and wanting to own your place in their life are not the same thing. And Callie keeps confusing them. By the finale, she finally says the quiet part out loud. She wants Margo back. Not divorced. Not together together. Just back to what they were. Margo refuses. Not because of Jed. Not because of the campaign. Because something has changed. She simply does not feel the same anymore. That should probably be the end. Naturally, it isn’t. Because Callie has also been trying to hurt Margo. Those photos? The blackmail? Callie. A “low moment,” apparently. Nothing says healthy attachment like weaponizing evidence because your best friend with benefits broke your heart. And the beautiful disaster of them is that both things are true at once. Callie really does love Margo. Callie really would protect her. Callie really would hurt her. Sometimes in the same week. Margo knows Callie is loyal. What she underestimates is how dangerous loyalty becomes when it feels replaced. Some deadly attractions burn because two people cannot stay away from each other. Margo and Callie? They burn because one woman thinks history should guarantee her a place in the future. And the other has already moved on. 💋

Kimber Loveland 🏳️‍⚧️ ⚢

14,510 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat