正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

consistently inconsistent

Carlton Blues Fans

5,957 subscribers

153,731 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

VAR, consistently inconsistent Stephen Warnock⚽️📺🎙 🙄 #itfc #PremierLeague

VAR, consistently inconsistent Stephen Warnock⚽️📺🎙 🙄 #itfc #PremierLeague

TheSuffolkCrunch

33,219 次观看 • 2 年前

Wike replies Tambuwal, says he (Tambuwal) and Atiku have been consistently inconsistent, betrayers. -Nyesom Wike, FCT Minister #PoliticsToday

Wike replies Tambuwal, says he (Tambuwal) and Atiku have been consistently inconsistent, betrayers. -Nyesom Wike, FCT Minister #PoliticsToday

Channels Television

33,730 次观看 • 11 个月前

This is Peter Greengory Obi Peter Obi one of the men that said they have a better alternative. Consistently inconsistent

This is Peter Greengory Obi Peter Obi one of the men that said they have a better alternative. Consistently inconsistent

D. H Bwala

29,453 次观看 • 4 个月前

Before vs after. A liar. A desperate and incompetent dullard. A panderer. A confused man. A complete misfit. Little wonder he couldn't manage his own family because he is never straight forward. Consistently inconsistent.

Before vs after. A liar. A desperate and incompetent dullard. A panderer. A confused man. A complete misfit. Little wonder he couldn't manage his own family because he is never straight forward. Consistently inconsistent.

John Oyesile, mPSN. RPharmS.

11,359 次观看 • 5 个月前

Clubs need to start demanding answers because the standard of the officiating in this country is getting worse by the week. How’s one, where there’s contact, not given and another, where there’s no contact, given a week later?! 🫨😶 Consistently inconsistent.

Clubs need to start demanding answers because the standard of the officiating in this country is getting worse by the week. How’s one, where there’s contact, not given and another, where there’s no contact, given a week later?! 🫨😶 Consistently inconsistent.

Shaun Corrigan ⁷

275,151 次观看 • 2 年前

Jarred Kelenic talking hitting. Precision over muscling up & trying to swing so hard. Strike the ball consistently with good barrel accuracy & good things will happen. Try & swing too hard & you will be inconsistent. You want high bat speed & exit velocity for sure. But that comes from the weight room, proper nutrition, & a bat speed plan. Once you do that & have the elite engine. You just try to strike it cleanly! Hitters University

Jarred Kelenic talking hitting. Precision over muscling up & trying to swing so hard. Strike the ball consistently with good barrel accuracy & good things will happen. Try & swing too hard & you will be inconsistent. You want high bat speed & exit velocity for sure. But that comes from the weight room, proper nutrition, & a bat speed plan. Once you do that & have the elite engine. You just try to strike it cleanly! Hitters University

Tyler Osik

51,728 次观看 • 1 年前

$50/day → $500/day minimum. (And we're just getting started) My client Caleb Francis was stuck at maybe $50/day on Facebook. Inconsistent. Frustrating. Not sustainable. Then we stepped in. Here's what changed: - Increased posting cadence - Applied real engagement tactics - Used every META tool to maximize earnings The result? His LOWEST day now = $500 His highest day = over $1,000 We're consistently growing his page every single week. And the plan for the rest of the year? $15k-$30k per month. This isn't luck. It's a repeatable system. Most creators think they need to go viral or have massive followings. Caleb proves that wrong. You just need the right strategy + execution.

$50/day → $500/day minimum. (And we're just getting started) My client Caleb Francis was stuck at maybe $50/day on Facebook. Inconsistent. Frustrating. Not sustainable. Then we stepped in. Here's what changed: - Increased posting cadence - Applied real engagement tactics - Used every META tool to maximize earnings The result? His LOWEST day now = $500 His highest day = over $1,000 We're consistently growing his page every single week. And the plan for the rest of the year? $15k-$30k per month. This isn't luck. It's a repeatable system. Most creators think they need to go viral or have massive followings. Caleb proves that wrong. You just need the right strategy + execution.

Fitzy

24,088 次观看 • 10 个月前

𝗣𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻: "𝗪𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮." 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘀 > 𝟭𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘆𝘁𝗵: More demonstrations always mean better models. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: I've seen models trained on 200 high-quality demonstrations outperform models trained on 20,000 sloppy ones. Consistently. What makes a demonstration "high-quality"? - Smooth, deliberate motions (not rushed or hesitant) - Consistent task execution strategy across demos - Clear success/failure outcomes with proper labeling - Representative of actual deployment conditions - Performed by skilled demonstrators who understand the task What kills demonstration quality: - Human fatigue after 50+ consecutive demos - Time pressure ("let's just get this data collected") - Inconsistent demonstrators with different techniques - Collecting in unrealistic lab conditions - No real-time feedback on demonstration quality Unlike computer vision where you can throw away bad images easily, 𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. Every single one needs to count. 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁. What's your ratio of "data collected" vs "data actually used for training"?

𝗣𝗼𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗮𝗿 𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗼𝗻: "𝗪𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮." 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: 𝟭𝟬𝟬 𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝘀 > 𝟭𝟬,𝟬𝟬𝟬 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝘆𝘁𝗵: More demonstrations always mean better models. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆: I've seen models trained on 200 high-quality demonstrations outperform models trained on 20,000 sloppy ones. Consistently. What makes a demonstration "high-quality"? - Smooth, deliberate motions (not rushed or hesitant) - Consistent task execution strategy across demos - Clear success/failure outcomes with proper labeling - Representative of actual deployment conditions - Performed by skilled demonstrators who understand the task What kills demonstration quality: - Human fatigue after 50+ consecutive demos - Time pressure ("let's just get this data collected") - Inconsistent demonstrators with different techniques - Collecting in unrealistic lab conditions - No real-time feedback on demonstration quality Unlike computer vision where you can throw away bad images easily, 𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. Every single one needs to count. 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗴𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁. What's your ratio of "data collected" vs "data actually used for training"?

Stephen James

35,147 次观看 • 1 年前

President Trump truthed one of Nick Adams Memes from back in February and I quote... America has been sick for a long time. President Trump is healing this nation. Check out some of his other posts to get an understanding of how Godly this man is. Who is Nick Adams? Nick Adams is an Australian-born American conservative author, speaker, and Trump appointee. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen, Stage IV cancer survivor, and founder of FLAG USA a nonprofit that has distributed millions of pocket Constitutions and founding documents to students to teach American civics, patriotism, and the nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage. He is a devout Christian who openly speaks about his faith in Jesus Christ, promotes “Make America Godly Again,” and frames his work around God-centered values, family, and freedom. About the post: On February 4, 2026, Nick Adams posted this striking image with the caption: “America has been sick for a long time. President Trump is healing this nation.” It is symbolic, patriotic artwork, not a literal religious statement. The image uses powerful visual elements to show America (represented as a sick man) being restored under President Trump’s leadership after years of division and decline, in the eyes of many supporters. President Trump later shared a similar version on Truth Social, which is why it’s circulating again. People are reading all kinds of wild meanings into it because of the biblical-style imagery (Trump in white robes with a healing touch, light, eagles, soldiers, etc.). In context, it is simply strong admiration for Trump’s impact on the country not claiming he is Jesus or performing miracles. Nick Adams is a Godly man who loves America and consistently points people toward faith, the Constitution, and traditional values. This post reflects his deep belief that strong, principled leadership is helping restore the nation. Many have accused Pope Leo XIV of blasphemy mainly over what they see as inconsistent emphasis when he speaks on abortion alongside immigration enforcement, with the minority directly labeling the Pope’s stance blasphemous for allegedly insulting God’s order or the sanctity of life in inconsistent application. Context matters. Share thoughtfully. Nick Adams 📱 Nick Adams Capt Kyle

President Trump truthed one of Nick Adams Memes from back in February and I quote... America has been sick for a long time. President Trump is healing this nation. Check out some of his other posts to get an understanding of how Godly this man is. Who is Nick Adams? Nick Adams is an Australian-born American conservative author, speaker, and Trump appointee. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen, Stage IV cancer survivor, and founder of FLAG USA a nonprofit that has distributed millions of pocket Constitutions and founding documents to students to teach American civics, patriotism, and the nation’s Judeo-Christian heritage. He is a devout Christian who openly speaks about his faith in Jesus Christ, promotes “Make America Godly Again,” and frames his work around God-centered values, family, and freedom. About the post: On February 4, 2026, Nick Adams posted this striking image with the caption: “America has been sick for a long time. President Trump is healing this nation.” It is symbolic, patriotic artwork, not a literal religious statement. The image uses powerful visual elements to show America (represented as a sick man) being restored under President Trump’s leadership after years of division and decline, in the eyes of many supporters. President Trump later shared a similar version on Truth Social, which is why it’s circulating again. People are reading all kinds of wild meanings into it because of the biblical-style imagery (Trump in white robes with a healing touch, light, eagles, soldiers, etc.). In context, it is simply strong admiration for Trump’s impact on the country not claiming he is Jesus or performing miracles. Nick Adams is a Godly man who loves America and consistently points people toward faith, the Constitution, and traditional values. This post reflects his deep belief that strong, principled leadership is helping restore the nation. Many have accused Pope Leo XIV of blasphemy mainly over what they see as inconsistent emphasis when he speaks on abortion alongside immigration enforcement, with the minority directly labeling the Pope’s stance blasphemous for allegedly insulting God’s order or the sanctity of life in inconsistent application. Context matters. Share thoughtfully. Nick Adams 📱 Nick Adams Capt Kyle

Capt Kyle

60,433 次观看 • 4 个月前

The LUCAS device, also known as the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System, is revolutionizing the way we perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). This mechanical marvel is designed to deliver high-quality chest compressions during cardiac arrest, ensuring consistent and uninterrupted compressions that are crucial for maintaining blood circulation and oxygen delivery to vital organs. How does LUCAS work? Imagine a portable, easy-to-use device that can seamlessly integrate into your emergency response protocol. The LUCAS device does just that, providing consistent and high-quality chest compressions, even during transport or in challenging environments. This frees up healthcare providers to focus on other critical tasks during resuscitation efforts, optimizing the overall care for the patient. Why is LUCAS so important? Manual chest compressions, while essential, can be inconsistent and tiring for healthcare providers, especially during prolonged resuscitation attempts. The LUCAS device ensures that the patient receives the necessary compressions at the correct depth and rate, enhancing the chances of successful resuscitation. Benefits of using LUCAS: Improved chest compression quality:LUCAS consistently delivers high-quality chest compressions, even in challenging situations. Reduced provider fatigue:By taking over chest compressions, LUCAS allows healthcare providers to focus on other critical tasks. Enhanced patient outcomes:Consistent and effective chest compressions are crucial for improving patient survival rates after cardiac arrest. Where is LUCAS used? The LUCAS device is becoming increasingly popular in hospitals and emergency medical services worldwide. Its portability and ease of use make it ideal for use in various settings, including ambulances, operating rooms, and even during transport. The future of CPR: The LUCAS device represents a significant advancement in CPR technology. Its ability to deliver consistent and high-quality chest compressions is revolutionizing the way we respond to cardiac arrest, ultimately improving patient outcomes. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more innovative solutions to emerge in the field of CPR, further enhancing our ability to save lives."

The LUCAS device, also known as the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System, is revolutionizing the way we perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). This mechanical marvel is designed to deliver high-quality chest compressions during cardiac arrest, ensuring consistent and uninterrupted compressions that are crucial for maintaining blood circulation and oxygen delivery to vital organs. How does LUCAS work? Imagine a portable, easy-to-use device that can seamlessly integrate into your emergency response protocol. The LUCAS device does just that, providing consistent and high-quality chest compressions, even during transport or in challenging environments. This frees up healthcare providers to focus on other critical tasks during resuscitation efforts, optimizing the overall care for the patient. Why is LUCAS so important? Manual chest compressions, while essential, can be inconsistent and tiring for healthcare providers, especially during prolonged resuscitation attempts. The LUCAS device ensures that the patient receives the necessary compressions at the correct depth and rate, enhancing the chances of successful resuscitation. Benefits of using LUCAS: Improved chest compression quality:LUCAS consistently delivers high-quality chest compressions, even in challenging situations. Reduced provider fatigue:By taking over chest compressions, LUCAS allows healthcare providers to focus on other critical tasks. Enhanced patient outcomes:Consistent and effective chest compressions are crucial for improving patient survival rates after cardiac arrest. Where is LUCAS used? The LUCAS device is becoming increasingly popular in hospitals and emergency medical services worldwide. Its portability and ease of use make it ideal for use in various settings, including ambulances, operating rooms, and even during transport. The future of CPR: The LUCAS device represents a significant advancement in CPR technology. Its ability to deliver consistent and high-quality chest compressions is revolutionizing the way we respond to cardiac arrest, ultimately improving patient outcomes. As technology continues to evolve, we can expect even more innovative solutions to emerge in the field of CPR, further enhancing our ability to save lives."

Fatai Ibrahim, RN,MSN 🇳🇬🇺🇸

54,852 次观看 • 1 年前

I was surprised and intrigued while watching Chelsea's performance against Fulham yesterday by Alonso's tactical choice. Specifically, I'm referring to his willingness to try and control the game without the ball - another detail that I pointed out during the live analysis. I've been thinking about it today and have come to find more logical reasoning (especially point 4 of advantages) in Alonso's decision. I still hold the same reservations but it is an interesting trade-off. Let's start with the cons of trying to defensively control the game. Risks: 1. Lack of influence on how the game is dictated. 2. 5-2-3 passive structure prevents easy transitions into man-man press and regularly force turnovers. 3. Collectively, Chelsea seemed to struggle a bit with the structure since the team isn't yet used to defending deep in a zonal system, which wasn't used by Maresca often. So, the players aren't used to it. 4. Susceptibility to conceding long balls, which Chelsea, sometimes, looked uncomfortable when trying to deal with it. 5. More territory for opposition closer to Chelsea's goal and attempt shots against an inconsistent goalkeeper. Advantages: 1. Energy conservation during the game. 2. Opportunities to attack on transitions against players who are not elite large-space defenders. 3. Protection for Chelsea's midfielders as they do not have to consistently defend large spaces. 4. Potential transferability of this defensive system across seasons. As in, if we employ intense out-of-possession tactics this campaign with fewer games, Alonso would need to alter the system next season, assuming we qualify for Europe. This way, we can already begin practicing a potential long-term solution. I want to highlight this as the most beneficial takeaway. I find Alonso's comments quite fascinating with him suggesting the need to be "comfortable without the ball", and mentioning how he wants the team to decide which spaces to defend and when. The latter is especially interesting. I think it will take time as many of these players are used to controlling games with the ball. So, I expect there to be a period where we make individual and collective errors due to poor defensive decision-making before it gets ironed out.

I was surprised and intrigued while watching Chelsea's performance against Fulham yesterday by Alonso's tactical choice. Specifically, I'm referring to his willingness to try and control the game without the ball - another detail that I pointed out during the live analysis. I've been thinking about it today and have come to find more logical reasoning (especially point 4 of advantages) in Alonso's decision. I still hold the same reservations but it is an interesting trade-off. Let's start with the cons of trying to defensively control the game. Risks: 1. Lack of influence on how the game is dictated. 2. 5-2-3 passive structure prevents easy transitions into man-man press and regularly force turnovers. 3. Collectively, Chelsea seemed to struggle a bit with the structure since the team isn't yet used to defending deep in a zonal system, which wasn't used by Maresca often. So, the players aren't used to it. 4. Susceptibility to conceding long balls, which Chelsea, sometimes, looked uncomfortable when trying to deal with it. 5. More territory for opposition closer to Chelsea's goal and attempt shots against an inconsistent goalkeeper. Advantages: 1. Energy conservation during the game. 2. Opportunities to attack on transitions against players who are not elite large-space defenders. 3. Protection for Chelsea's midfielders as they do not have to consistently defend large spaces. 4. Potential transferability of this defensive system across seasons. As in, if we employ intense out-of-possession tactics this campaign with fewer games, Alonso would need to alter the system next season, assuming we qualify for Europe. This way, we can already begin practicing a potential long-term solution. I want to highlight this as the most beneficial takeaway. I find Alonso's comments quite fascinating with him suggesting the need to be "comfortable without the ball", and mentioning how he wants the team to decide which spaces to defend and when. The latter is especially interesting. I think it will take time as many of these players are used to controlling games with the ball. So, I expect there to be a period where we make individual and collective errors due to poor defensive decision-making before it gets ironed out.

Fahd

52,662 次观看 • 9 天前

POV: turning a simple morning routine into a cinematic little story ☕🐶✨ From waking up and making coffee to taking the dog out for a peaceful morning walk. Created with Seedance 2.5 on TapNow PROMPT: 30-SECOND CINEMATIC MORNING VLOG — “FROM BED TO OUTSIDE” Use the user-provided character reference as a strict identity lock and the user-provided outfit reference exactly. Keep the same face, hairstyle, body proportions, clothing, shoes, and accessories throughout the entire video. Use the same dog consistently in every shot. FORMAT: 16:9 widescreen, photorealistic, premium lifestyle vlog, cinematic natural lighting, realistic motion, subtle film grain, warm morning color grading. 0–5 SEC — WAKE UP Soft morning sunlight enters the bedroom. The character slowly wakes up, sits on the edge of the bed, runs a hand through his hair, and takes a quiet moment before getting up. Slow cinematic push-in, natural bedroom ambience. 5–10 SEC — COFFEE Cut to the kitchen. He prepares a simple morning coffee. Close-up of coffee beans, water pouring, coffee filling the cup, then him taking the first sip beside the kitchen window. Warm sunlight, shallow depth of field, gentle handheld camera movement. 10–15 SEC — GETTING READY He puts on his shoes, grabs his keys and leash, and looks toward his dog waiting excitedly near the door. Quick but smooth cinematic cuts. The dog happily follows him toward the entrance. 15–25 SEC — MORNING WALK He steps outside with his dog into a peaceful morning street. They walk casually together through a quiet neighborhood. Capture wide establishing shots, low-angle walking shots, close-ups of their feet, the dog walking beside him, and natural sunlight filtering through trees. 25–30 SEC — FINAL SHOT Wide cinematic shot from behind as the character and dog continue walking down the street. He briefly looks toward the morning sky while the dog walks beside him. Slow camera pull-back, peaceful ending. CAMERA STYLE: Smooth handheld movement, slow push-ins, gentle tracking shots, occasional low angles, natural transitions, realistic depth of field, cinematic framing. AUDIO: Natural morning ambience, birds, subtle footsteps, coffee machine sounds, leash movement, soft city atmosphere. Minimal calm background music. NEGATIVE PROMPT: identity changes, outfit changes, inconsistent dog, different dog breed, distorted anatomy, extra limbs, unnatural walking, floating objects, unrealistic motion, excessive camera shake, oversaturated colors, artificial skin, cartoon, anime, CGI look, text, subtitles, watermark, logo.

Caden Flux

23,181 次观看 • 8 天前

I hereby continue with my campaign and here is day 4 of trying to convince Manchester City to sign Anis Hadj Moussa. Now, let's talk about him (informal scouting report), a player I have been hyping for days and who, I believe provides us the perfect balance of instant impact and upside potential. According to what I have seen, he profiles as an explosive, direct attacker with elite one-versus-one dribbling ability and a strong goalscoring threat from wide areas. His game is built around carrying the ball into dangerous positions, cutting inside onto his stronger left foot, and either shooting or creating chances for teammates. Does that sound familiar to my fellow City fans? Playing Style and Tactical Role: - Functions best as a right-sided inside forward in possession-based systems that allow him freedom to drift infield and attack spaces between the lines. - When receiving the ball in the final third, his first instincts are typically to drive forward with dribbles or look for shooting opportunities. - One thing to note is that his progressive carrying is exceptional, ranking in the 93rd percentile among comparable wingers, which makes him an effective ball-progressor from wide areas. - While primarily a goal threat, he also ranks above average for progressive passes and dangerous passes, indicating he can link play and provide for teammates, though this remains a secondary skill compared to his dribbling and shooting. Let's discuss his strengths: 1. 1v1 Dribbling: - Possesses elite ball control and the ability to beat defenders in tight spaces. - His unpredictable changes of pace and direction make him extremely difficult to mark in isolation. - Ranks in the 84th percentile for successful take-ons and consistently completes dribbles at a high rate. 2. Progressive Ball Carrying: - His capacity to drive forward with the ball and break defensive lines is among his standout attributes. - Ranking in the 93rd percentile for progressive carries, he consistently advances play from wide areas into the final third. 3. Final Third Threat: - Ranks in the 96th percentile for touches in the attacking penalty area and the 89th percentile for non-penalty goals per 90 minutes. 4. Set-Piece Delivery: - Offers additional creative value through accurate corner and free-kick delivery, adding another dimension to his attacking contribution. 5. Chance Creation: - He ranks in the 96th percentile for chances created, highlighting his ability to generate scoring opportunities for teammates in addition to his own goal threat. Now, the weaknesses. 1. Defensive Work Rate: - His defensive contributions rank in the 7th percentile, indicating limited involvement in tracking back, pressing, and defensive positioning. - His defensive numbers are generally below average, though his defensive duel success rate remains solid. This is an area with significant room for improvement and Maresca would have to work a lot with him on that aspect. 2. Aerial Duels: - He ranks in the 34th percentile for aerial duels won, limiting his effectiveness both offensively and defensively in aerial situations. 3. Pass Completion and Build-up Involvement: - His pass completion rate ranks in the 21st percentile at approximately 67.9 percent, reflecting inconsistency in build-up play. - This is partly a symptom of his direct attacking style, which prioritizes forward carries and shots over safe circulation, but it can limit his effectiveness in systems requiring high possession retention. An area of massive improvement. 4. Tactical Discipline - Still developing his off-ball movement and understanding of defensive shape. - His positioning when not in possession can be inconsistent, and he occasionally loses track of overlapping fullbacks. Elite coaching can help improve this aspect. My honest opinion (executive summary): Moussa is a high-upside, left-footed right winger (which is what we need) with elite one-versus-one dribbling, exceptional progressive carrying, and a proven goalscoring threat from wide areas. He is ideally suited to possession-based systems that value direct attacking play (vertical patterns) and can benefit from his ability to break down low-block defenses (should I talk further about low-blocks to a City fan, eh?) I believe that his primary areas for development lie in defensive work rate, pass completion in build-up phases, and tactical discipline when out of possession, however, he would be an amazing addition to our squad.

I hereby continue with my campaign and here is day 4 of trying to convince Manchester City to sign Anis Hadj Moussa. Now, let's talk about him (informal scouting report), a player I have been hyping for days and who, I believe provides us the perfect balance of instant impact and upside potential. According to what I have seen, he profiles as an explosive, direct attacker with elite one-versus-one dribbling ability and a strong goalscoring threat from wide areas. His game is built around carrying the ball into dangerous positions, cutting inside onto his stronger left foot, and either shooting or creating chances for teammates. Does that sound familiar to my fellow City fans? Playing Style and Tactical Role: - Functions best as a right-sided inside forward in possession-based systems that allow him freedom to drift infield and attack spaces between the lines. - When receiving the ball in the final third, his first instincts are typically to drive forward with dribbles or look for shooting opportunities. - One thing to note is that his progressive carrying is exceptional, ranking in the 93rd percentile among comparable wingers, which makes him an effective ball-progressor from wide areas. - While primarily a goal threat, he also ranks above average for progressive passes and dangerous passes, indicating he can link play and provide for teammates, though this remains a secondary skill compared to his dribbling and shooting. Let's discuss his strengths: 1. 1v1 Dribbling: - Possesses elite ball control and the ability to beat defenders in tight spaces. - His unpredictable changes of pace and direction make him extremely difficult to mark in isolation. - Ranks in the 84th percentile for successful take-ons and consistently completes dribbles at a high rate. 2. Progressive Ball Carrying: - His capacity to drive forward with the ball and break defensive lines is among his standout attributes. - Ranking in the 93rd percentile for progressive carries, he consistently advances play from wide areas into the final third. 3. Final Third Threat: - Ranks in the 96th percentile for touches in the attacking penalty area and the 89th percentile for non-penalty goals per 90 minutes. 4. Set-Piece Delivery: - Offers additional creative value through accurate corner and free-kick delivery, adding another dimension to his attacking contribution. 5. Chance Creation: - He ranks in the 96th percentile for chances created, highlighting his ability to generate scoring opportunities for teammates in addition to his own goal threat. Now, the weaknesses. 1. Defensive Work Rate: - His defensive contributions rank in the 7th percentile, indicating limited involvement in tracking back, pressing, and defensive positioning. - His defensive numbers are generally below average, though his defensive duel success rate remains solid. This is an area with significant room for improvement and Maresca would have to work a lot with him on that aspect. 2. Aerial Duels: - He ranks in the 34th percentile for aerial duels won, limiting his effectiveness both offensively and defensively in aerial situations. 3. Pass Completion and Build-up Involvement: - His pass completion rate ranks in the 21st percentile at approximately 67.9 percent, reflecting inconsistency in build-up play. - This is partly a symptom of his direct attacking style, which prioritizes forward carries and shots over safe circulation, but it can limit his effectiveness in systems requiring high possession retention. An area of massive improvement. 4. Tactical Discipline - Still developing his off-ball movement and understanding of defensive shape. - His positioning when not in possession can be inconsistent, and he occasionally loses track of overlapping fullbacks. Elite coaching can help improve this aspect. My honest opinion (executive summary): Moussa is a high-upside, left-footed right winger (which is what we need) with elite one-versus-one dribbling, exceptional progressive carrying, and a proven goalscoring threat from wide areas. He is ideally suited to possession-based systems that value direct attacking play (vertical patterns) and can benefit from his ability to break down low-block defenses (should I talk further about low-blocks to a City fan, eh?) I believe that his primary areas for development lie in defensive work rate, pass completion in build-up phases, and tactical discipline when out of possession, however, he would be an amazing addition to our squad.

CitySide

60,542 次观看 • 14 天前

How to ACTUALLY reach 500 points on Arc without getting stuck or confused 👇 A lot of people complain: "Bro I watched all videos/articles already but not getting points anymore" 😭 The problem is most users consume everything randomly in one day without tracking anything. Here’s the easiest method that helped many users 👇 1️⃣ Don’t watch content randomly Every day, new videos/articles get published on arc. So first: – Open 2 tabs/windows – Tab 1 = Arc Home page – Tab 2 = Contribution page (where you see points for videos/articles) Now on the Contribution page: – Click the 3 dots/menu – Find the “Find/Search in page” option 👀 Then: – Copy one video/article title from Home page – Search it inside Contribution page Now you’ll understand: – which content already gave points – which one DIDN’T give points yet If no points were received before for that content, then watching it now can still reward points 🤝 This is the main trick most people miss. 2️⃣ Watch content in an organized way Start either: – from oldest content OR – newest content But stay consistent. Every day: – Watch around 4 videos – Read around 5 articles ⚠️ Don’t randomly open 20 videos together. After watching: – wait around 5–10 mins – points usually get added quickly If no points appear: that content probably won’t reward anymore → move to next one. Also remember: – which article/video you ended on today – continue from there tomorrow Mobile users can also use multiple tabs/windows same as PC 👀 Honestly, if you stay consistent with only videos + articles, 500+ points becomes very achievable. And don’t forget livestreams: many web livestreams give around 20 points each 🤝 3️⃣ Timing matters A LOT This is another huge mistake people make 👇 Most users: – watch today at random time – then watch tomorrow at another random time Result? No points 😭 Arc content rewards usually need a FULL 24h reset. Example: If you watched today at 6PM, then tomorrow start again around: 6:10PM – 6:15PM Don’t rush before 24h fully passes. And again: – only do around 4 videos + 5 articles daily – once points are added, stop there Watching too many extra videos usually doesn’t help. 4️⃣ Discord Application Tips (VERY IMPORTANT) Most people get rejected because their answers don’t match each other 😭 Example: Question 2: "What are you?" – You select “Content Creator” Then Question 3: "How will you help Arc?" – You answer “Building apps” See the problem? 👀 Your answers should CONNECT with each other. If you choose: – Content creator → talk about guides, videos, education, helping users. If you choose: – Builder → talk about products, apps, tools, etc. Usually 4–5 questions are connected together. If your answers feel random or inconsistent, rejection chance becomes very high. My suggestion 👇 – Reach 500 points first – Then apply carefully – Stay active in Discord – Join livestreams – Help community members on discord – Keep contributing & building consistently That’s honestly the best way to grow inside the ecosystem, and slowly get recognition for Tier badges & other community roles/badges too 💙 If you helped, please do like,repost & sahre you your frns🥰

How to ACTUALLY reach 500 points on Arc without getting stuck or confused 👇 A lot of people complain: "Bro I watched all videos/articles already but not getting points anymore" 😭 The problem is most users consume everything randomly in one day without tracking anything. Here’s the easiest method that helped many users 👇 1️⃣ Don’t watch content randomly Every day, new videos/articles get published on arc. So first: – Open 2 tabs/windows – Tab 1 = Arc Home page – Tab 2 = Contribution page (where you see points for videos/articles) Now on the Contribution page: – Click the 3 dots/menu – Find the “Find/Search in page” option 👀 Then: – Copy one video/article title from Home page – Search it inside Contribution page Now you’ll understand: – which content already gave points – which one DIDN’T give points yet If no points were received before for that content, then watching it now can still reward points 🤝 This is the main trick most people miss. 2️⃣ Watch content in an organized way Start either: – from oldest content OR – newest content But stay consistent. Every day: – Watch around 4 videos – Read around 5 articles ⚠️ Don’t randomly open 20 videos together. After watching: – wait around 5–10 mins – points usually get added quickly If no points appear: that content probably won’t reward anymore → move to next one. Also remember: – which article/video you ended on today – continue from there tomorrow Mobile users can also use multiple tabs/windows same as PC 👀 Honestly, if you stay consistent with only videos + articles, 500+ points becomes very achievable. And don’t forget livestreams: many web livestreams give around 20 points each 🤝 3️⃣ Timing matters A LOT This is another huge mistake people make 👇 Most users: – watch today at random time – then watch tomorrow at another random time Result? No points 😭 Arc content rewards usually need a FULL 24h reset. Example: If you watched today at 6PM, then tomorrow start again around: 6:10PM – 6:15PM Don’t rush before 24h fully passes. And again: – only do around 4 videos + 5 articles daily – once points are added, stop there Watching too many extra videos usually doesn’t help. 4️⃣ Discord Application Tips (VERY IMPORTANT) Most people get rejected because their answers don’t match each other 😭 Example: Question 2: "What are you?" – You select “Content Creator” Then Question 3: "How will you help Arc?" – You answer “Building apps” See the problem? 👀 Your answers should CONNECT with each other. If you choose: – Content creator → talk about guides, videos, education, helping users. If you choose: – Builder → talk about products, apps, tools, etc. Usually 4–5 questions are connected together. If your answers feel random or inconsistent, rejection chance becomes very high. My suggestion 👇 – Reach 500 points first – Then apply carefully – Stay active in Discord – Join livestreams – Help community members on discord – Keep contributing & building consistently That’s honestly the best way to grow inside the ecosystem, and slowly get recognition for Tier badges & other community roles/badges too 💙 If you helped, please do like,repost & sahre you your frns🥰

wyne

10,372 次观看 • 3 个月前