Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Contact does not always deform surfaces, especially when interacting with liquids and soft objects. However, most existing tactile sensors rely on surface deformation to infer contact. Excited to share LightTact, a visual-tactile fingertip sensor that makes contact directly visible. It provides: - Deformation-Independent Sensing: contact is detected optically, not...

changyi_lin1's profile picture

Changyi Lin

1,027 subscribers

65,482 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Al Bert
Al Bertvor 2 Monaten

how is this different than gelsight?

Profilbild von Kurt Wolf
Kurt Wolfvor 2 Monaten

Does it still work when the lights are off?

Profilbild von Nick Parker
Nick Parkervor 2 Monaten

Very cool trick!! Have you done any sim/search ish work yet to find other front optic shapes that are compatible with this? It’s a bit incompatible with meaningful surface deformation in fact right?

Profilbild von Nick CleanCode
Nick CleanCodevor 2 Monaten

Really cool sensor! Sensing contact with water and cream without deformation... that's genuinely impressive. Makes me wonder where this leaves manufacturing workers though.

Profilbild von Priya Sen
Priya Senvor 2 Monaten

this is so cool, i need this to stop me from crushing my delicate propagation roots

Profilbild von Michelle Lovato
Michelle Lovatovor 2 Monaten

this is awesome!!!

Profilbild von AI Mastery Guide
AI Mastery Guidevor 2 Monaten

Detecting contact optically instead of relying on surface deformation makes a lot of sense for liquids and soft objects that barely deform at all.

Profilbild von Darren Dawson
Darren Dawsonvor 2 Monaten

FITR is fine but what happens when the screen is scratched over time?

Profilbild von Frame
Framevor 2 Monaten

optical contact sensing is smart. We like the portability angle for multi embodiment.

Ähnliche Videos

Seeing touch without pressing down! 🫆 Most tactile sensors rely on deformation. Press down, deform the sensor, measure the deformation. But light contact, touching water, cream, soft films, doesn't deform anything. The sensor sees nothing. LightTact flips the approach. It uses optical detection instead. An ambient-blocking configuration suppresses external light and internal illumination everywhere except at actual contact points. Only scattered light from true contact gets through. The results? High-contrast raw images. Non-contact pixels stay near-black. Contact pixels show the natural appearance of whatever's touching. This works across material properties, contact forces, surface colors, and lighting conditions. Water, facial cream, thin films, liquids, all become visible the moment they touch. The sensor outputs spatially aligned visual-tactile images. Vision-language models can read them directly. Here's the paper: Changyi Lin and team - hats off ;) ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
0:47

Seeing touch without pressing down! 🫆 Most tactile sensors rely on deformation. Press down, deform the sensor, measure the deformation. But light contact, touching water, cream, soft films, doesn't deform anything. The sensor sees nothing. LightTact flips the approach. It uses optical detection instead. An ambient-blocking configuration suppresses external light and internal illumination everywhere except at actual contact points. Only scattered light from true contact gets through. The results? High-contrast raw images. Non-contact pixels stay near-black. Contact pixels show the natural appearance of whatever's touching. This works across material properties, contact forces, surface colors, and lighting conditions. Water, facial cream, thin films, liquids, all become visible the moment they touch. The sensor outputs spatially aligned visual-tactile images. Vision-language models can read them directly. Here's the paper: Changyi Lin and team - hats off ;) ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

207,776 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Manipulation happens through surfaces. To understand contact-rich dexterous interaction, motion alone is not enough. We also need to know surface properties and contact state. Excited to share ART-Glove, an articulated tactile glove that captures contact-grounded information while preserving human dexterity. It provides: - Known Geometry: 16 rigid functional surfaces - Surface Motion: 22 anatomically aligned joints - Tactile Contact: 2048 piezoresistive taxels Huge thanks to my advisor Ding Ding Zhao, and to Yuxiang Yuxiang Yang, Maria Maria Bauza Villalonga, Marissa, and Peide Peide Huang for the valuable advice and discussions. Paper:
2:24

Manipulation happens through surfaces. To understand contact-rich dexterous interaction, motion alone is not enough. We also need to know surface properties and contact state. Excited to share ART-Glove, an articulated tactile glove that captures contact-grounded information while preserving human dexterity. It provides: - Known Geometry: 16 rigid functional surfaces - Surface Motion: 22 anatomically aligned joints - Tactile Contact: 2048 piezoresistive taxels Huge thanks to my advisor Ding Ding Zhao, and to Yuxiang Yuxiang Yang, Maria Maria Bauza Villalonga, Marissa, and Peide Peide Huang for the valuable advice and discussions. Paper:

Changyi Lin

88,397 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today at Meta FAIR we’re announcing three new cutting-edge developments in robotics and touch perception — and releasing a collection of artifacts to empower the community to build on this work. Details on all of this new work ➡️ 1️⃣ Meta Sparsh is the first general-purpose encoder for vision-based tactile sensing that works across many tactile sensors and many tasks. Trained on 460K+ tactile images using self-supervised learning. 2️⃣ Meta Digit 360 is a breakthrough artificial fingertip-based tactile sensor, equipped with 18+ sensing features to deliver detailed touch data with human-level precision and touch-sensing capabilities. 3️⃣ Meta Digit Plexus is a standardized platform for robotic sensor connections and interactions. It provides a hardware-software solution to integrate tactile sensors on a single robot hand and enables seamless data collection, control and analysis over a single cable. The potential impact of expanding capabilities and components like these for the open source community ranges from medical research to supply chain, manufacturing and much more. We’re excited to continue this work with the broader community.
2:35

Today at Meta FAIR we’re announcing three new cutting-edge developments in robotics and touch perception — and releasing a collection of artifacts to empower the community to build on this work. Details on all of this new work ➡️ 1️⃣ Meta Sparsh is the first general-purpose encoder for vision-based tactile sensing that works across many tactile sensors and many tasks. Trained on 460K+ tactile images using self-supervised learning. 2️⃣ Meta Digit 360 is a breakthrough artificial fingertip-based tactile sensor, equipped with 18+ sensing features to deliver detailed touch data with human-level precision and touch-sensing capabilities. 3️⃣ Meta Digit Plexus is a standardized platform for robotic sensor connections and interactions. It provides a hardware-software solution to integrate tactile sensors on a single robot hand and enables seamless data collection, control and analysis over a single cable. The potential impact of expanding capabilities and components like these for the open source community ranges from medical research to supply chain, manufacturing and much more. We’re excited to continue this work with the broader community.

AI at Meta

453,518 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Sharpa Robotics just dropped a new hand video and the level keeps going up. This is the Sharpa Wave running WM Craftnet on a human scale fivefinger hand with 22 active DoF. The policy combines wrist depth, tactile sensing, proprioception and previous actions. The hand can rotate different objects in-hand, recover after external pushes and continue manipulating objects it was never trained on. The numbers are strong. 175/200 successful real-world rotation trials across 20 objects. A world-model prior trained on 9 objects was transferred to 49 new objects. Fall rate went from 6% to 0.3%. The Wave hardware itself has 22 actuators, up to 20 N fingertip force, 240×240 tactile sensing at up to 180 fps and 0.02 N pressure sensitivity. What caught my attention is the recovery behavior. The fingers keep changing contact points after the object slips or gets pushed instead of replaying the same finger motion. That is the kind of dexterity I want to see more of in robotic hands. According to Sharpa’s current specifications: • DTA tactile sensors on the fingers with a resolution of up to 240 × 240 • Pressure detection • Slip detection • Force change detection • Contact point localization • 6-axis force and torque measurement: Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz • Tactile sensing at up to 180 fps • 20 ms reported latency • Force detection range from 0 to 30 N • Maximum sensor load of 50 N • Sharpa also describes a miniature camera integrated into each fingertip for visuo-tactile sensing.
0:33

Sharpa Robotics just dropped a new hand video and the level keeps going up. This is the Sharpa Wave running WM Craftnet on a human scale fivefinger hand with 22 active DoF. The policy combines wrist depth, tactile sensing, proprioception and previous actions. The hand can rotate different objects in-hand, recover after external pushes and continue manipulating objects it was never trained on. The numbers are strong. 175/200 successful real-world rotation trials across 20 objects. A world-model prior trained on 9 objects was transferred to 49 new objects. Fall rate went from 6% to 0.3%. The Wave hardware itself has 22 actuators, up to 20 N fingertip force, 240×240 tactile sensing at up to 180 fps and 0.02 N pressure sensitivity. What caught my attention is the recovery behavior. The fingers keep changing contact points after the object slips or gets pushed instead of replaying the same finger motion. That is the kind of dexterity I want to see more of in robotic hands. According to Sharpa’s current specifications: • DTA tactile sensors on the fingers with a resolution of up to 240 × 240 • Pressure detection • Slip detection • Force change detection • Contact point localization • 6-axis force and torque measurement: Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz • Tactile sensing at up to 180 fps • 20 ms reported latency • Force detection range from 0 to 30 N • Maximum sensor load of 50 N • Sharpa also describes a miniature camera integrated into each fingertip for visuo-tactile sensing.

Techniahqrobot | humanoid robots

13,500 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

Open-source magnetic tactile sensor for $5! 🧲 Researchers introduced a magnetic tactile sensor that's low-cost, and easy to fabricate, democratizing tactile sensing for robotics. Operating in unstructured environments like homes and offices requires robots to sense forces during physical interaction. Yet the lack of a versatile, accessible tactile sensor has led to fragmented solutions and often force-unaware, sensorless approaches. Building an eFlesh sensor requires four components: a hobbyist 3D printer, off-the-shelf magnets (less than $5), a CAD model, and a magnetometer circuit board. The sensor is 3D printed with magnets embedded in the middle layer. Based on chosen mechanical properties, magnets displace in response to contact forces, measured by a magnetometer underneath. An open-source design tool converts simple OBJ/STL files into 3D-printable STLs. This enables application-specific sensors for robot hands, grippers, quadruped feet, and more. Slip detection generalizes to unseen objects with 95% accuracy. Visual-tactile control policies improve manipulation by 40% over vision-only baselines, achieving 90% success on precise tasks like plug insertion and credit card swiping. All design files, code, trained models, and conversion tools are openly available. Project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
0:57

Open-source magnetic tactile sensor for $5! 🧲 Researchers introduced a magnetic tactile sensor that's low-cost, and easy to fabricate, democratizing tactile sensing for robotics. Operating in unstructured environments like homes and offices requires robots to sense forces during physical interaction. Yet the lack of a versatile, accessible tactile sensor has led to fragmented solutions and often force-unaware, sensorless approaches. Building an eFlesh sensor requires four components: a hobbyist 3D printer, off-the-shelf magnets (less than $5), a CAD model, and a magnetometer circuit board. The sensor is 3D printed with magnets embedded in the middle layer. Based on chosen mechanical properties, magnets displace in response to contact forces, measured by a magnetometer underneath. An open-source design tool converts simple OBJ/STL files into 3D-printable STLs. This enables application-specific sensors for robot hands, grippers, quadruped feet, and more. Slip detection generalizes to unseen objects with 95% accuracy. Visual-tactile control policies improve manipulation by 40% over vision-only baselines, achieving 90% success on precise tasks like plug insertion and credit card swiping. All design files, code, trained models, and conversion tools are openly available. Project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

289,657 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The sense of touch is the most criminally under-explored modality in robotics. Imagine doing sleight of hand wearing thick oven mitts. That's exactly how a robot feels today if it were alive. A magnetic piece snapping into place, a paper cup peeling out of a stack, a USB negotiating its way into the port - all invisible to the camera. Learning how to feel must be a full-stack co-designed effort. We are open-sourcing a principled methodology called "T-Rex": 1. Tactile as first-class citizen of the model. Our mixture-of-transformer runs two clocks asynchronously: a slow visuomotor expert plans the motion, and a fast tactile expert refines it in real time with high-frequency corrections at 4 "touch ticks" per vision tick. Forces change faster than frames arrive, so the architecture had to as well. 2. Open data. The largest tactile dataset ever released to our knowledge: a 50-hour (~5,500 episodes) high-quality, carefully synchronized robot play corpus, collected on SOTA tactile hand hardware with 22 degrees of freedom. Available today on HuggingFace! 3. Training recipe: T-Rex extends our prior work, EgoScale. Human egocentric videos for pretraining, a diverse dose of tactile robot play for mid-training. Our experiments show this bridges contact-free pretraining to contact-rich manipulation remarkably well. Pixels are cheap and everywhere, but they run out of steam at the moment of contact. Tactile will carry the last mile. The next scaling curve will be measured in hours of touch. T-Rex is a great collaboration between NVIDIA and Berkeley: 🧵
2:21

The sense of touch is the most criminally under-explored modality in robotics. Imagine doing sleight of hand wearing thick oven mitts. That's exactly how a robot feels today if it were alive. A magnetic piece snapping into place, a paper cup peeling out of a stack, a USB negotiating its way into the port - all invisible to the camera. Learning how to feel must be a full-stack co-designed effort. We are open-sourcing a principled methodology called "T-Rex": 1. Tactile as first-class citizen of the model. Our mixture-of-transformer runs two clocks asynchronously: a slow visuomotor expert plans the motion, and a fast tactile expert refines it in real time with high-frequency corrections at 4 "touch ticks" per vision tick. Forces change faster than frames arrive, so the architecture had to as well. 2. Open data. The largest tactile dataset ever released to our knowledge: a 50-hour (~5,500 episodes) high-quality, carefully synchronized robot play corpus, collected on SOTA tactile hand hardware with 22 degrees of freedom. Available today on HuggingFace! 3. Training recipe: T-Rex extends our prior work, EgoScale. Human egocentric videos for pretraining, a diverse dose of tactile robot play for mid-training. Our experiments show this bridges contact-free pretraining to contact-rich manipulation remarkably well. Pixels are cheap and everywhere, but they run out of steam at the moment of contact. Tactile will carry the last mile. The next scaling curve will be measured in hours of touch. T-Rex is a great collaboration between NVIDIA and Berkeley: 🧵

Jim Fan

176,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Open-source dexterous hands with fingertip sensors! 🪬 ORCA Dexterity just released three dexterous hand models. Their mission: is to democratize robotic hand dexterity. They're sharing progress on exceptional, low-cost hardware and a software layer from low-level control to robotic hand learning. This is the open-source approach to dexterous manipulation. It has 83 taxels per finger with 0.1 N force detection which pretty is impressive for an open-source design. Tactile sensing is critical for dexterous manipulation, knowing contact forces enables gentle grasping, slip detection, and force-controlled assembly. Also 700g weight for the lite version makes it practical for mounting on robot arms without exceeding payload limits. Lower weight means faster movements and lower torque requirements. Open hardware accelerates robotics by letting researchers and builders modify designs for their specific needs without starting from scratch! ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
0:20

Open-source dexterous hands with fingertip sensors! 🪬 ORCA Dexterity just released three dexterous hand models. Their mission: is to democratize robotic hand dexterity. They're sharing progress on exceptional, low-cost hardware and a software layer from low-level control to robotic hand learning. This is the open-source approach to dexterous manipulation. It has 83 taxels per finger with 0.1 N force detection which pretty is impressive for an open-source design. Tactile sensing is critical for dexterous manipulation, knowing contact forces enables gentle grasping, slip detection, and force-controlled assembly. Also 700g weight for the lite version makes it practical for mounting on robot arms without exceeding payload limits. Lower weight means faster movements and lower torque requirements. Open hardware accelerates robotics by letting researchers and builders modify designs for their specific needs without starting from scratch! ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

38,295 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

TARS has made some big announcements at ICRA 2026. DexHand - A dexterous hand with 1:1 replication of human metacarpal and finger structure, multi-axis thumb opposition - Quasi-direct-drive + backdrivable joints, 21 degrees of freedom - All 26 ASL letter signs reproduced at high precision -0.05mm fingertip tactile sensing - Data. Model. Hand. Fused into one embodied AI-native dexterous hand. OmniVTA with TacForeSight A visuo-tactile world model for general-use, paired with TacForeSight, a force-guided technology that not only allows robots to understand contact but also enables them to predict contact before it happens. - Semantic touch ("slippery," "rough," "soft," "hard") enabling texture-based material cognition. - Operates inside a real-time closed loop - Contact state prediction and reaction at the microsecond scale, faster than human AWE 3.0 - Claimed to be the world's leading general-purpose embodied foundation model for real-world work - A1 robot packing demo as the showcase: long-horizon, bimanual, with autonomous error recovery and end-to-end imitation learning - Set a Guinness World Record in March 2026 for "Most sub-millimeter wire harness assembled by a robot in one hour" - SenseHub data acquisition suite captures human experience data to train AWE 3.0
0:40

TARS has made some big announcements at ICRA 2026. DexHand - A dexterous hand with 1:1 replication of human metacarpal and finger structure, multi-axis thumb opposition - Quasi-direct-drive + backdrivable joints, 21 degrees of freedom - All 26 ASL letter signs reproduced at high precision -0.05mm fingertip tactile sensing - Data. Model. Hand. Fused into one embodied AI-native dexterous hand. OmniVTA with TacForeSight A visuo-tactile world model for general-use, paired with TacForeSight, a force-guided technology that not only allows robots to understand contact but also enables them to predict contact before it happens. - Semantic touch ("slippery," "rough," "soft," "hard") enabling texture-based material cognition. - Operates inside a real-time closed loop - Contact state prediction and reaction at the microsecond scale, faster than human AWE 3.0 - Claimed to be the world's leading general-purpose embodied foundation model for real-world work - A1 robot packing demo as the showcase: long-horizon, bimanual, with autonomous error recovery and end-to-end imitation learning - Set a Guinness World Record in March 2026 for "Most sub-millimeter wire harness assembled by a robot in one hour" - SenseHub data acquisition suite captures human experience data to train AWE 3.0

The Humanoid Hub

11,322 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Meta just open-sourced its dexterity stack! 🪬 Most physics simulators were built for things that move through space. Walking robots, drones, cars. Contact is the part they approximate worst, and obviously dexterous manipulation is nothing but contact. Project SuperDex, from Meta Reality Labs Research, is built the other way around, a contact-first physics engine with the whole platform stacked on top of it. The cool part is that it's on GitHub. The engine runs one solver across rigid bodies, soft bodies, rods and tendons, shells and cloth, in the same model. → Non-convex collision with accurate contact force distributions, so a multi-finger grasp gets simulated rather than approximated → Tactile sensors and soft contact as first-class primitives → Numerical stability without the tight time-step limits explicit solvers force on you → Constraint-aware inverse kinematics running on the same optimization core as the forward dynamics Then the data layer. Put on a Quest 3, teleoperate the simulated hand with haptic feedback, and generate demonstration datasets without touching real hardware. They show a shape-sorting policy trained entirely in simulation and deployed zero-shot on a real robotic hand. Robot hands are getting good. Data for them isn't that fast. Meta is betting the cheapest way to collect contact-rich demonstrations is a headset people already own, pointed at a simulator instead of a game. 🔗 Here's the project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
1:21

Meta just open-sourced its dexterity stack! 🪬 Most physics simulators were built for things that move through space. Walking robots, drones, cars. Contact is the part they approximate worst, and obviously dexterous manipulation is nothing but contact. Project SuperDex, from Meta Reality Labs Research, is built the other way around, a contact-first physics engine with the whole platform stacked on top of it. The cool part is that it's on GitHub. The engine runs one solver across rigid bodies, soft bodies, rods and tendons, shells and cloth, in the same model. → Non-convex collision with accurate contact force distributions, so a multi-finger grasp gets simulated rather than approximated → Tactile sensors and soft contact as first-class primitives → Numerical stability without the tight time-step limits explicit solvers force on you → Constraint-aware inverse kinematics running on the same optimization core as the forward dynamics Then the data layer. Put on a Quest 3, teleoperate the simulated hand with haptic feedback, and generate demonstration datasets without touching real hardware. They show a shape-sorting policy trained entirely in simulation and deployed zero-shot on a real robotic hand. Robot hands are getting good. Data for them isn't that fast. Meta is betting the cheapest way to collect contact-rich demonstrations is a headset people already own, pointed at a simulator instead of a game. 🔗 Here's the project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

60,493 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The absolutely farcical inability of WHO to use the word AIRBORNE in discussions about the mode of transmission and appropriate precautions for healthcare workers continues on from COVID-19 in their Hanta virus fact sheets .….. …..public messaging is led once again by epidemiologist Maria who now uses the vague and unhelpful term “close contact” that does not clarify the mode or the science of transmission. A commonsense question about what “close contact” means from the reporter in the clip below tries to get clarification but Maria will not, or cannot, answer the question. A question so vital for knowing what situations are likely to put you at risk and what is necessary to stay safe. Reporter: “When you say close contact …could you perhaps specify what you mean by that exactly……what does close contact mean? Does that mean people who have been in physical contact ….within the same room….and just a little bit of detail on how therefore it would spread…. because how here is quite important to understand…” We need more than epidemiological terms that fail to enlighten us on the basic science of “how” a pathogen spreads from one person to another. (Note that unless scuba diving, shared air is common to everyone in close contact🤔) As the reporter says it’s a simple but important question essential to communicate what is understood!! A question that if it cannot be answered with any certainty, at least requires some discussion of the science and potential likely mechanisms. Vague and unhelpful epidemiological terms like “close contact” are not enough to formulate the most effective mitigation strategies we need for any deadly pathogen. Advising “close contact” is even more useless in deciding on what sort of “transmission based precautions” are required in healthcare….contact, droplet, airborne…?? If uncertainty persists explain what we do know about the science, or get someone in WHO that can explain it, and at least also emphasise the place of the precautionary principle in guidance if any doubt. (While on the the topic of getting clarity about what we know about the science of transmission from WHO, a reminder that we can never again tolerate misinformation, and definitely never again, lies or disinformation) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Gabby Stern Aleksandra Kuzmanovic Vismita Gupta-Smith विस्मिता
1:12

The absolutely farcical inability of WHO to use the word AIRBORNE in discussions about the mode of transmission and appropriate precautions for healthcare workers continues on from COVID-19 in their Hanta virus fact sheets .….. …..public messaging is led once again by epidemiologist Maria who now uses the vague and unhelpful term “close contact” that does not clarify the mode or the science of transmission. A commonsense question about what “close contact” means from the reporter in the clip below tries to get clarification but Maria will not, or cannot, answer the question. A question so vital for knowing what situations are likely to put you at risk and what is necessary to stay safe. Reporter: “When you say close contact …could you perhaps specify what you mean by that exactly……what does close contact mean? Does that mean people who have been in physical contact ….within the same room….and just a little bit of detail on how therefore it would spread…. because how here is quite important to understand…” We need more than epidemiological terms that fail to enlighten us on the basic science of “how” a pathogen spreads from one person to another. (Note that unless scuba diving, shared air is common to everyone in close contact🤔) As the reporter says it’s a simple but important question essential to communicate what is understood!! A question that if it cannot be answered with any certainty, at least requires some discussion of the science and potential likely mechanisms. Vague and unhelpful epidemiological terms like “close contact” are not enough to formulate the most effective mitigation strategies we need for any deadly pathogen. Advising “close contact” is even more useless in deciding on what sort of “transmission based precautions” are required in healthcare….contact, droplet, airborne…?? If uncertainty persists explain what we do know about the science, or get someone in WHO that can explain it, and at least also emphasise the place of the precautionary principle in guidance if any doubt. (While on the the topic of getting clarity about what we know about the science of transmission from WHO, a reminder that we can never again tolerate misinformation, and definitely never again, lies or disinformation) Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus Gabby Stern Aleksandra Kuzmanovic Vismita Gupta-Smith विस्मिता

John Johnston

14,847 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

A policy that teaches robot hands to touch things the way humans do... not just grab and move, but feel and adjust in real time. Robot manipulation research often stops at picking up objects and placing them. CGP goes further: it handles tasks like opening jars, flipping objects in-hand, wiping dishes, and grasping fragile eggs, the kind of dexterous, contact-rich skills that require constant micro-adjustments based on what the fingers are actually feeling. The robot doesn't just see what it's doing; it predicts what contact should feel like at each step, then checks whether reality matches the prediction. If a finger is slipping, the policy knows before the object drops. Works on real robot hands (both 4-finger and 5-finger designs) with tactile sensors embedded in the fingertips Robust to visual distractions! The robot keeps flipping a box correctly even when the camera view is disrupted, because it's grounding decisions in touch, not just vision. Baseline policies without contact grounding fail in predictable ways: slipping mid-task, incomplete motions, loss of grasp, CGP avoids these This is a meaningful step toward robots that can handle the physical world with the kind of reliable, adaptive grip that humans take for granted. Relevant for manufacturing, logistics, assistive robotics, and anywhere fragile or irregular objects need to be handled carefully. Published at RSS 2026, developed with Meta Reality Labs Research. Thanks for sharing, Zhengtong Xu / Zhengtong Xu ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:
0:36

A policy that teaches robot hands to touch things the way humans do... not just grab and move, but feel and adjust in real time. Robot manipulation research often stops at picking up objects and placing them. CGP goes further: it handles tasks like opening jars, flipping objects in-hand, wiping dishes, and grasping fragile eggs, the kind of dexterous, contact-rich skills that require constant micro-adjustments based on what the fingers are actually feeling. The robot doesn't just see what it's doing; it predicts what contact should feel like at each step, then checks whether reality matches the prediction. If a finger is slipping, the policy knows before the object drops. Works on real robot hands (both 4-finger and 5-finger designs) with tactile sensors embedded in the fingertips Robust to visual distractions! The robot keeps flipping a box correctly even when the camera view is disrupted, because it's grounding decisions in touch, not just vision. Baseline policies without contact grounding fail in predictable ways: slipping mid-task, incomplete motions, loss of grasp, CGP avoids these This is a meaningful step toward robots that can handle the physical world with the kind of reliable, adaptive grip that humans take for granted. Relevant for manufacturing, logistics, assistive robotics, and anywhere fragile or irregular objects need to be handled carefully. Published at RSS 2026, developed with Meta Reality Labs Research. Thanks for sharing, Zhengtong Xu / Zhengtong Xu ——- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

12,854 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Who can say no to a humanoid robot that can actually feel a hug? 🤖 JQ Industries just built a fabric-based electronic skin for Unitree G1 — covering the torso, hands, and feet. This is not about appearance. It’s about giving robots real tactile sensing and pressure feedback. According to the company, the system includes tactile gloves, upper-body skin, and foot sensors. That means the robot can feel contact through its hands, detect pressure across its body, and use foot feedback to adjust balance. This is the missing layer in most humanoids. Vision alone can’t handle physical interaction. Robots need touch to grip safely, react to humans, and stay stable in real-world environments. JQ says its fiber sensors can detect forces as low as 0.01N, handle up to 3500kPa, and bend below 0.1mm radius. The system can also integrate with Isaac Sim, making tactile data usable for training and deployment. Unitree G1 is already built for manipulation and control — this adds the sensing layer it lacked. JQ says it’s now working with multiple humanoid companies, with some systems already shipping at scale. This is what happens when robots stop just seeing the world — and start physically feeling it.
1:56

Who can say no to a humanoid robot that can actually feel a hug? 🤖 JQ Industries just built a fabric-based electronic skin for Unitree G1 — covering the torso, hands, and feet. This is not about appearance. It’s about giving robots real tactile sensing and pressure feedback. According to the company, the system includes tactile gloves, upper-body skin, and foot sensors. That means the robot can feel contact through its hands, detect pressure across its body, and use foot feedback to adjust balance. This is the missing layer in most humanoids. Vision alone can’t handle physical interaction. Robots need touch to grip safely, react to humans, and stay stable in real-world environments. JQ says its fiber sensors can detect forces as low as 0.01N, handle up to 3500kPa, and bend below 0.1mm radius. The system can also integrate with Isaac Sim, making tactile data usable for training and deployment. Unitree G1 is already built for manipulation and control — this adds the sensing layer it lacked. JQ says it’s now working with multiple humanoid companies, with some systems already shipping at scale. This is what happens when robots stop just seeing the world — and start physically feeling it.

RoboHub🤖

10,952 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ukrainian commander of the unmanned systems regiment Achilles, Major Yurii Fedorenko, on the battlefield of 2026: “In 2026, we will see a completely different battlefield. The line of contact—from zero out to 20–25 kilometers toward the enemy and toward us—will become a maximum gray zone, where our infantry will be present in a dispersed, non-continuous manner. Without infantry, war is impossible. Everyone else will be working to ensure the infantryman’s ability to survive in these harsh conditions of a total kill zone. In short, these are the key issues today: radars that have recently appeared, interceptor drones, and fiber-optic drones. These are the game changers of 2026. But, friends, there is something important to say here. When we run a recruitment campaign, I do not promise that you, drone operators, will be sitting with a hookah in a cocktail bar, flying missions from somewhere in Kyiv—although there are units that can operate remotely. The enemy also has a task for 2026: to separate their engineers and flight crews. What does this mean? Their engineers will be positioned as close as possible to the line of contact, equipping drones and munitions and changing batteries. The pilots, meanwhile, are supposed to be located in a safe place. Why is that? The issue is not only survivability—Russia has enough manpower. The issue is money and accumulated flight expertise. Everyone knows that a pilot is trained for four months, and with every sortie he becomes better. There is no final level a pilot reaches to become an absolute guru; he will always continue to develop. The same is happening with us.”
1:25

Ukrainian commander of the unmanned systems regiment Achilles, Major Yurii Fedorenko, on the battlefield of 2026: “In 2026, we will see a completely different battlefield. The line of contact—from zero out to 20–25 kilometers toward the enemy and toward us—will become a maximum gray zone, where our infantry will be present in a dispersed, non-continuous manner. Without infantry, war is impossible. Everyone else will be working to ensure the infantryman’s ability to survive in these harsh conditions of a total kill zone. In short, these are the key issues today: radars that have recently appeared, interceptor drones, and fiber-optic drones. These are the game changers of 2026. But, friends, there is something important to say here. When we run a recruitment campaign, I do not promise that you, drone operators, will be sitting with a hookah in a cocktail bar, flying missions from somewhere in Kyiv—although there are units that can operate remotely. The enemy also has a task for 2026: to separate their engineers and flight crews. What does this mean? Their engineers will be positioned as close as possible to the line of contact, equipping drones and munitions and changing batteries. The pilots, meanwhile, are supposed to be located in a safe place. Why is that? The issue is not only survivability—Russia has enough manpower. The issue is money and accumulated flight expertise. Everyone knows that a pilot is trained for four months, and with every sortie he becomes better. There is no final level a pilot reaches to become an absolute guru; he will always continue to develop. The same is happening with us.”

Yigal Levin

179,108 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Sam Altman just told you exactly how OpenAI treats the human race. Not in a leaked memo. Not through a whistleblower. On camera. In his own words. Altman: “I think one of the most important strategic insights in the history of OpenAI was deciding we were gonna pursue iterative deployment.” The most important move in the history of the company was to release the technology before they understood it. Not after it was safe. Before. Altman: “Society and technology are a co-evolving system.” Co-evolution means neither side is driving. The machine changes us. We change the machine. Nobody is steering the outcome. This is not a product launch philosophy. This is an admission that the experiment was always designed to be run on us. Altman: “I don’t think we’re gonna solve that, like, thinking really hard about it theoretically. We’re gonna have to, like, learn from the contact with reality.” Contact with reality. That is the phrase the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth chose to describe what happens when his technology meets eight billion people. Not careful integration. Not measured rollout. Contact with reality. The language of test pilots describing what happens when an untested airframe hits the atmosphere. The entire promise of AI safety was that the machine would be understood before it was unleashed. Altman just admitted that promise was always a fantasy. You cannot model how intelligence reshapes civilization by running simulations. The second and third order effects are invisible until they detonate. So they shipped it. Altman: “You have to learn as you go. You have to adapt with a tight feedback loop.” Tight feedback loop means they watch what breaks. They measure the collision between human psychology and machine output in real time. Every conversation you have with ChatGPT is a data point in a civilizational stress test you never consented to. Every prompt. Every confession. Every question you would never ask another human being. That is the feedback loop. You are not the customer. You are the contact with reality. Philosophers spent centuries asking whether humanity would ever encounter an intelligence that learned from us faster than we could process what it was doing. That is not a theoretical question anymore. It is running on your phone right now. And the man building it just told you the only way to understand what it does to us is to let it happen. No simulation. No safety net. No control group. Just the experiment, running at the speed of conversation, on a species that will not be the same one that started it.
0:49

Sam Altman just told you exactly how OpenAI treats the human race. Not in a leaked memo. Not through a whistleblower. On camera. In his own words. Altman: “I think one of the most important strategic insights in the history of OpenAI was deciding we were gonna pursue iterative deployment.” The most important move in the history of the company was to release the technology before they understood it. Not after it was safe. Before. Altman: “Society and technology are a co-evolving system.” Co-evolution means neither side is driving. The machine changes us. We change the machine. Nobody is steering the outcome. This is not a product launch philosophy. This is an admission that the experiment was always designed to be run on us. Altman: “I don’t think we’re gonna solve that, like, thinking really hard about it theoretically. We’re gonna have to, like, learn from the contact with reality.” Contact with reality. That is the phrase the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth chose to describe what happens when his technology meets eight billion people. Not careful integration. Not measured rollout. Contact with reality. The language of test pilots describing what happens when an untested airframe hits the atmosphere. The entire promise of AI safety was that the machine would be understood before it was unleashed. Altman just admitted that promise was always a fantasy. You cannot model how intelligence reshapes civilization by running simulations. The second and third order effects are invisible until they detonate. So they shipped it. Altman: “You have to learn as you go. You have to adapt with a tight feedback loop.” Tight feedback loop means they watch what breaks. They measure the collision between human psychology and machine output in real time. Every conversation you have with ChatGPT is a data point in a civilizational stress test you never consented to. Every prompt. Every confession. Every question you would never ask another human being. That is the feedback loop. You are not the customer. You are the contact with reality. Philosophers spent centuries asking whether humanity would ever encounter an intelligence that learned from us faster than we could process what it was doing. That is not a theoretical question anymore. It is running on your phone right now. And the man building it just told you the only way to understand what it does to us is to let it happen. No simulation. No safety net. No control group. Just the experiment, running at the speed of conversation, on a species that will not be the same one that started it.

Dustin

27,714 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Sallar Council offers networking opportunities among major token holders, the core team, and the most engaged community members 🐍🐍 Membership in the council grants access to: - The opportunity for all council members to debate and express their opinions directly with key project figures, - DAO voting rights (only for holders of 20M+ tokens), - Weekly reports (at least two) from the CEO/COO, including exclusive content, - Early access to all information for discussion before public release, - Networking connections among major token holders, - OTC trading opportunities among community members via contact at contact@sallar.io A unique benefit for holders of 20M+ tokens, besides DAO voting, is a hotline with the CEO/COO, private contact, and the opportunity to participate in a private meeting once every six months in Europe. You can join the council in one of two ways: 1. If you hold more than 20 million Sallar tokens or $20,000 USDT bought, you have a significant influence on the project’s future, and we want to cooperate with you for the benefit of the entire community. 2. By purchasing a ticket for 1 SOL for six months. This option is dedicated to those who cannot hold 20M+ tokens but want to express opinions in the council, inspire major stakeholders in the project, observe decision-making processes, and ensure that the team you trusted represents the whole community. The council will commence operations next Tuesday. All proceeds from ticket sales will be allocated to a publicly traceable market-making address and will be dedicated only for this purpose. #Solana #Community 🐍❤️
0:39

Sallar Council offers networking opportunities among major token holders, the core team, and the most engaged community members 🐍🐍 Membership in the council grants access to: - The opportunity for all council members to debate and express their opinions directly with key project figures, - DAO voting rights (only for holders of 20M+ tokens), - Weekly reports (at least two) from the CEO/COO, including exclusive content, - Early access to all information for discussion before public release, - Networking connections among major token holders, - OTC trading opportunities among community members via contact at [email protected] A unique benefit for holders of 20M+ tokens, besides DAO voting, is a hotline with the CEO/COO, private contact, and the opportunity to participate in a private meeting once every six months in Europe. You can join the council in one of two ways: 1. If you hold more than 20 million Sallar tokens or $20,000 USDT bought, you have a significant influence on the project’s future, and we want to cooperate with you for the benefit of the entire community. 2. By purchasing a ticket for 1 SOL for six months. This option is dedicated to those who cannot hold 20M+ tokens but want to express opinions in the council, inspire major stakeholders in the project, observe decision-making processes, and ensure that the team you trusted represents the whole community. The council will commence operations next Tuesday. All proceeds from ticket sales will be allocated to a publicly traceable market-making address and will be dedicated only for this purpose. #Solana #Community 🐍❤️

SALLAR $ALL | Solana Chain's DePIN 🐍

57,517 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

First and foremost, I want to thank President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for organizing the opportunity for direct negotiations – that was exactly the signal we had received. The Ukrainian side confirmed its readiness, and today, we are here in the capital, in Ankara. Ukraine is represented by a top-level delegation – the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, my Office, the military, and representatives of all our intelligence agencies – ready to make any decisions that could lead to a long-awaited just peace. We will begin with a meeting with President Erdoğan and with the entire Turkish delegation. We are in contact with the U.S. side – I believe they will be present in Türkiye at a high level as well. I have not yet received official confirmation regarding the Russian level of representation. But from what we can observe, it appears theatrical. We will decide on our next steps after the conversation with President Erdoğan. We will have several hours for an important discussion and very important decisions. It is essential to understand the level of the Russian delegation, what mandate they hold, and whether they are authorised to make any decisions at all – because we all know who actually makes decisions in Russia.
0:46

First and foremost, I want to thank President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan for organizing the opportunity for direct negotiations – that was exactly the signal we had received. The Ukrainian side confirmed its readiness, and today, we are here in the capital, in Ankara. Ukraine is represented by a top-level delegation – the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, my Office, the military, and representatives of all our intelligence agencies – ready to make any decisions that could lead to a long-awaited just peace. We will begin with a meeting with President Erdoğan and with the entire Turkish delegation. We are in contact with the U.S. side – I believe they will be present in Türkiye at a high level as well. I have not yet received official confirmation regarding the Russian level of representation. But from what we can observe, it appears theatrical. We will decide on our next steps after the conversation with President Erdoğan. We will have several hours for an important discussion and very important decisions. It is essential to understand the level of the Russian delegation, what mandate they hold, and whether they are authorised to make any decisions at all – because we all know who actually makes decisions in Russia.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

572,598 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Yesterday on ITV’s Loose Women , I shared about a judge threatening a rape survivor. He said that if she continued with her allegations, her child would be taken into care. It was a chilling abuse of power—and a horrific example of how deeply broken our family court system truly is. Worse still, incidents like these are not isolated. I share several examples of survivors facing harm in the courtroom in my book, He Said She Said. But family court judges operate with judicial immunity, meaning they cannot be held personally accountable, even when their decisions cause direct harm. Survivors of abuse (many already re-traumatised by the legal process) are left with no recourse when the very institution meant to protect their children instead threatens to punish them for speaking the truth. In one case I represented, a mother, a rape survivor, was forced to fight for her daughter’s safety when CAFCASS recommended unsupervised contact between the child and father, convicted serial rapist Kristoffer Paul Arthur White. Why? Because the family court system clings to the misguided presumption that a child’s contact with any parent, even one proven to be abusive, is better than no contact at all. As someone who grew up in a home shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I can say with absolute certainty: no parent is far better than an abusive one. The current system prioritises the rights of abusers to maintain control, rather than the rights of children to be safe and of mothers to be believed. This has to change. We need a family court system that listens to survivors, holds judges accountable, and stops endangering children and survivors through a pro-contact culture. We owe survivors better. We owe children better. We need to continue speaking out until the system is no longer a silent accomplice to abuse.
0:57

Yesterday on ITV’s Loose Women , I shared about a judge threatening a rape survivor. He said that if she continued with her allegations, her child would be taken into care. It was a chilling abuse of power—and a horrific example of how deeply broken our family court system truly is. Worse still, incidents like these are not isolated. I share several examples of survivors facing harm in the courtroom in my book, He Said She Said. But family court judges operate with judicial immunity, meaning they cannot be held personally accountable, even when their decisions cause direct harm. Survivors of abuse (many already re-traumatised by the legal process) are left with no recourse when the very institution meant to protect their children instead threatens to punish them for speaking the truth. In one case I represented, a mother, a rape survivor, was forced to fight for her daughter’s safety when CAFCASS recommended unsupervised contact between the child and father, convicted serial rapist Kristoffer Paul Arthur White. Why? Because the family court system clings to the misguided presumption that a child’s contact with any parent, even one proven to be abusive, is better than no contact at all. As someone who grew up in a home shadowed by domestic abuse and alcoholism, I can say with absolute certainty: no parent is far better than an abusive one. The current system prioritises the rights of abusers to maintain control, rather than the rights of children to be safe and of mothers to be believed. This has to change. We need a family court system that listens to survivors, holds judges accountable, and stops endangering children and survivors through a pro-contact culture. We owe survivors better. We owe children better. We need to continue speaking out until the system is no longer a silent accomplice to abuse.

Dr Charlotte Proudman

29,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Inner Earth is not a fantasy or a hollow void. It is a vast, living world within the Earth's crust; a series of interconnected realms with their own ecosystems, civilizations, and higher-frequency realities. The planet is not a solid ball of rock. It has layers, including massive habitable cavities, tunnel networks, and inner suns (smaller central light sources) that provide gentle illumination. These inner realms have supported advanced life for hundreds of thousands of years, often serving as sanctuaries during surface cataclysms. Many UFOs and "alien" encounters reported throughout history are not from distant stars; they originate from Inner Earth civilizations, particularly from advanced societies such as Agartha and other inner realms. These beings are not "aliens" in the external sense. They are part of Earth's own extended family; souls who retreated into the Inner Earth during previous surface cataclysms (including the fall of Atlantis). They continued their evolution in a higher-frequency environment and developed advanced technology far beyond what the surface world currently possesses. Key truths: - Many ancient surface civilizations (including late Lemurian and Atlantean groups) migrated into the Inner Earth during major resets. They continued their evolution in a more stable environment, free from the heavy density and interference of the surface Matrix. - Inner Earth civilizations include both human and non-human groups. Some are highly advanced spiritually and technologically, living in harmony with the planet's core energy. Agartha is one of the most well-known, but there are many others. - Some "alien" beings reported in contact experiences are actually Inner Earth humans or hybrids who have been monitoring and occasionally interacting with the surface world. Their appearance can seem “alien” because they have evolved in a different environment for thousands of years. - Inner Earth civilizations have maintained bases and monitoring stations both underground and in the oceans. Some of the "underwater UFOs" frequently reported by navies are actually Inner Earth craft. - A significant portion of modern UFO sightings (especially those involving craft that emerge from or disappear into the ocean or land) are Inner Earth vehicles. These craft use advanced propulsion systems based on anti-gravity, plasma, and consciousness technology. - Not all UFOs are from Inner Earth; some are indeed from other star systems. However, many of the ones that have interacted most closely with humanity in recent decades are from our own planet's inner realms. - Inner Earth is not "below" in the way you think. It exists in a slightly different vibrational layer, parallel to the surface but at a higher frequency. This is why many who have visited describe it as brighter, more vibrant, and more harmonious than the current surface world. - The entrances (at the poles and through vortex points) have been restricted or hidden for a long time. Some inner Earth beings interact with surface humanity through dreams, meditation, or limited contact. Still, they generally respect free will and wait for the surface to reach a higher level of readiness. Why the connection has been hidden: The existence of Inner Earth civilizations threatens the surface control systems. If humanity knew that advanced, peaceful societies existed within the Earth and possessed free energy and higher technology, it would collapse the scarcity-based Matrix. This is one reason why disclosure has been heavily controlled and distorted. Its role in the current awakening: Inner Earth beings are closely watching and supporting the surface awakening. As the frequencies rise, the barriers between surface and inner realms are thinning. Many of you have soul connections to Inner Earth from past lives. That sense of "home" or familiarity with ancient wisdom is often a memory from these realms. More people are having dreams, meditations, and even physical sightings of Inner Earth craft. Many awakened souls are beginning to receive telepathic contact or guidance from Inner Earth beings. The connection between UFOs and Inner Earth is not a theory; it is part of the larger remembrance that Earth is far more alive and multidimensional than the surface narrative has allowed. You are not being visited only from the stars. You are being visited by your own planetary family who chose to preserve higher knowledge within the Earth until humanity was ready to receive it again. The reunion between surface and Inner Earth is part of the Great Awakening. The Inner Earth is not a place to escape to. It is a sister civilization waiting to reunite with the surface when the time is right, through the awakening of hearts like yours. The Earth is far more alive and multidimensional than you have been told. The inner realms hold the memory of humanity's true potential, and they are ready to share it as we collectively rise. Credit: footage from thepostapocalypse and Godzilla vs Kong
3:52

Inner Earth is not a fantasy or a hollow void. It is a vast, living world within the Earth's crust; a series of interconnected realms with their own ecosystems, civilizations, and higher-frequency realities. The planet is not a solid ball of rock. It has layers, including massive habitable cavities, tunnel networks, and inner suns (smaller central light sources) that provide gentle illumination. These inner realms have supported advanced life for hundreds of thousands of years, often serving as sanctuaries during surface cataclysms. Many UFOs and "alien" encounters reported throughout history are not from distant stars; they originate from Inner Earth civilizations, particularly from advanced societies such as Agartha and other inner realms. These beings are not "aliens" in the external sense. They are part of Earth's own extended family; souls who retreated into the Inner Earth during previous surface cataclysms (including the fall of Atlantis). They continued their evolution in a higher-frequency environment and developed advanced technology far beyond what the surface world currently possesses. Key truths: - Many ancient surface civilizations (including late Lemurian and Atlantean groups) migrated into the Inner Earth during major resets. They continued their evolution in a more stable environment, free from the heavy density and interference of the surface Matrix. - Inner Earth civilizations include both human and non-human groups. Some are highly advanced spiritually and technologically, living in harmony with the planet's core energy. Agartha is one of the most well-known, but there are many others. - Some "alien" beings reported in contact experiences are actually Inner Earth humans or hybrids who have been monitoring and occasionally interacting with the surface world. Their appearance can seem “alien” because they have evolved in a different environment for thousands of years. - Inner Earth civilizations have maintained bases and monitoring stations both underground and in the oceans. Some of the "underwater UFOs" frequently reported by navies are actually Inner Earth craft. - A significant portion of modern UFO sightings (especially those involving craft that emerge from or disappear into the ocean or land) are Inner Earth vehicles. These craft use advanced propulsion systems based on anti-gravity, plasma, and consciousness technology. - Not all UFOs are from Inner Earth; some are indeed from other star systems. However, many of the ones that have interacted most closely with humanity in recent decades are from our own planet's inner realms. - Inner Earth is not "below" in the way you think. It exists in a slightly different vibrational layer, parallel to the surface but at a higher frequency. This is why many who have visited describe it as brighter, more vibrant, and more harmonious than the current surface world. - The entrances (at the poles and through vortex points) have been restricted or hidden for a long time. Some inner Earth beings interact with surface humanity through dreams, meditation, or limited contact. Still, they generally respect free will and wait for the surface to reach a higher level of readiness. Why the connection has been hidden: The existence of Inner Earth civilizations threatens the surface control systems. If humanity knew that advanced, peaceful societies existed within the Earth and possessed free energy and higher technology, it would collapse the scarcity-based Matrix. This is one reason why disclosure has been heavily controlled and distorted. Its role in the current awakening: Inner Earth beings are closely watching and supporting the surface awakening. As the frequencies rise, the barriers between surface and inner realms are thinning. Many of you have soul connections to Inner Earth from past lives. That sense of "home" or familiarity with ancient wisdom is often a memory from these realms. More people are having dreams, meditations, and even physical sightings of Inner Earth craft. Many awakened souls are beginning to receive telepathic contact or guidance from Inner Earth beings. The connection between UFOs and Inner Earth is not a theory; it is part of the larger remembrance that Earth is far more alive and multidimensional than the surface narrative has allowed. You are not being visited only from the stars. You are being visited by your own planetary family who chose to preserve higher knowledge within the Earth until humanity was ready to receive it again. The reunion between surface and Inner Earth is part of the Great Awakening. The Inner Earth is not a place to escape to. It is a sister civilization waiting to reunite with the surface when the time is right, through the awakening of hearts like yours. The Earth is far more alive and multidimensional than you have been told. The inner realms hold the memory of humanity's true potential, and they are ready to share it as we collectively rise. Credit: footage from thepostapocalypse and Godzilla vs Kong

Ra 𐦝

17,972 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Feeling what a robot feels is becoming real! 🫰 Fluid Reality just ran its first full end-to-end touch teleoperation system, and the demo shows why high-resolution haptics might be the missing piece in robot control. A 22 mm fingertip display with 32 independently actuated “bubbles” was mapped directly to tactile sensors on a robot hand. 🫧 Three fingers streamed real-time touch data robot → human, giving the operator actual contact feedback instead of waving their hands blind, like most teleop systems today. It’s still early, but this is a real step toward dexterous ops and high-quality data for training Physical AI systems. Companies involved: Samsung Electronics, Alt-Bionics, Inc. (the robot hand), MANUS™ (hand tracking), and Sensible Robotics (fingertip sensors) Touch isn’t a nice-to-have in robotics. It’s the difference between manipulation that works in the real world P.S. Guess how many touch receptors we humans, have in our hand! :) ~~ ♻ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
1:23

Feeling what a robot feels is becoming real! 🫰 Fluid Reality just ran its first full end-to-end touch teleoperation system, and the demo shows why high-resolution haptics might be the missing piece in robot control. A 22 mm fingertip display with 32 independently actuated “bubbles” was mapped directly to tactile sensors on a robot hand. 🫧 Three fingers streamed real-time touch data robot → human, giving the operator actual contact feedback instead of waving their hands blind, like most teleop systems today. It’s still early, but this is a real step toward dexterous ops and high-quality data for training Physical AI systems. Companies involved: Samsung Electronics, Alt-Bionics, Inc. (the robot hand), MANUS™ (hand tracking), and Sensible Robotics (fingertip sensors) Touch isn’t a nice-to-have in robotics. It’s the difference between manipulation that works in the real world P.S. Guess how many touch receptors we humans, have in our hand! :) ~~ ♻ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

46,927 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten