Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

📣🚨CONVERSION THERAPY BAN PETITION The Government has announced it intends to press ahead with a ban on conversion therapy. Like most 'bans', this sounds benign. How could anyone not want to ban giving electric shocks to gay kids? But the fact is, that's already against the law, as are...

SpeechUnion's profile picture

The Free Speech Union

218,315 subscribers

93,230 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇
2:44

When the Government says it is banning something to ‘protect’ people, more often than not it is not about safety but about clamping down on free speech. FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw was on Talk to discuss the Government’s new draft Bill to ban conversion practices and the chilling effect it could have on free speech — particularly on conversations between parents and gender-confused children. You can easily imagine a situation in which a vulnerable child, having been radicalised into believing their parents are evil for not affirming their gender identity, reports them to the police. Even the threat of being reported could deter parents from having well-intentioned conversations with their children for fear of prosecution. Under the draft Bill, they could face a maximum sentence of five years in prison. Watch Connie’s interview below and sign the FSU’s petition 👇

The Free Speech Union

12,471 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

“That is exactly what this Bill will criminalise. Conversations.” Previous governments tried to introduce a conversion therapy ban and failed. This Bill is far more sinister. It will criminalise the well-intentioned and often difficult conversations that parents may have with their gender-confused children. Previous versions of the legislation included specific carve-outs to ensure that parents would not be criminalised for such conversations. This Bill contains no such protections. Parents could face up to five years behind bars for discouraging their children from embarking on irreversible, life-changing medical pathways. This is a full-on assault on freedom of speech. Watch James Esses and Connie Shaw on the FSU Podcast 👇
1:01

“That is exactly what this Bill will criminalise. Conversations.” Previous governments tried to introduce a conversion therapy ban and failed. This Bill is far more sinister. It will criminalise the well-intentioned and often difficult conversations that parents may have with their gender-confused children. Previous versions of the legislation included specific carve-outs to ensure that parents would not be criminalised for such conversations. This Bill contains no such protections. Parents could face up to five years behind bars for discouraging their children from embarking on irreversible, life-changing medical pathways. This is a full-on assault on freedom of speech. Watch James Esses and Connie Shaw on the FSU Podcast 👇

The Free Speech Union

19,681 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

The Government has announced a Bill to ban conversion practices that is so poorly and broadly drafted that it could see parents, therapists and religious leaders locked up for up to five years if they engage in well-intentioned conversations with gender-confused children or dare to share their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw sits down with therapist James Esses. The Minister for Equalities, Olivia Bailey MP, claims the Bill will not stop parents and therapists from talking openly to children with identity issues. She says it only criminalises conversion practices that are abusive and cause serious harm. However, James Esses, who works with children who believe they are “trapped in the wrong body”, argues that the proposed new law puts him at risk of imprisonment. Watch the full episode below 👇
0:55

The Government has announced a Bill to ban conversion practices that is so poorly and broadly drafted that it could see parents, therapists and religious leaders locked up for up to five years if they engage in well-intentioned conversations with gender-confused children or dare to share their faith’s teachings on sex, gender and marriage. On this week’s episode of the FSU Podcast, FSU External Affairs Officer Connie Shaw sits down with therapist James Esses. The Minister for Equalities, Olivia Bailey MP, claims the Bill will not stop parents and therapists from talking openly to children with identity issues. She says it only criminalises conversion practices that are abusive and cause serious harm. However, James Esses, who works with children who believe they are “trapped in the wrong body”, argues that the proposed new law puts him at risk of imprisonment. Watch the full episode below 👇

The Free Speech Union

43,027 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨 PARENTS, WAKE THE HELL UP! 🚨 This gender confused trans activist is screaming that any therapy to help gender-confused kids is “conversion therapy is abuse” and skewers the Supreme Court decision ruling that bans on such therapy is unconstitutional. Translation: They want to ban real help for kids struggling with dysphoria, rush them onto hormones and surgeries that sterilize them for life, and label concerned parents and doctors as abusers. Safe space for who? Not biological reality. Not desisters. Not the kids who will grow up regretting this madness. This is exactly how the grooming and mutilation pipeline starts. Enough. Share this if you’re done with the woke mind virus destroying our kids. Protect children NOW.
1:22

🚨 PARENTS, WAKE THE HELL UP! 🚨 This gender confused trans activist is screaming that any therapy to help gender-confused kids is “conversion therapy is abuse” and skewers the Supreme Court decision ruling that bans on such therapy is unconstitutional. Translation: They want to ban real help for kids struggling with dysphoria, rush them onto hormones and surgeries that sterilize them for life, and label concerned parents and doctors as abusers. Safe space for who? Not biological reality. Not desisters. Not the kids who will grow up regretting this madness. This is exactly how the grooming and mutilation pipeline starts. Enough. Share this if you’re done with the woke mind virus destroying our kids. Protect children NOW.

DocumentingLibs

12,466 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Free Speech Union has mixed feelings about Sir Keir Starmer’s departure as Prime Minister. On the one hand, he was no friend of free speech. On the other, he has been an outstanding recruiting sergeant for the FSU. Since he came to power in July 2024, the Free Speech Union’s membership has grown from 14,000 to 45,000. Unfortunately, we have little faith that Andy Burnham will be any better when it comes to free speech. Burnham has already called for greater restrictions on social media, and the Representation of the People Bill is likely to contain all kinds of threats to free speech. There is also no indication that he will abandon plans to ban “conversion therapy”, legislation that could see parents investigated or even prosecuted for conversations with their gender-confused children. It won’t be long before Sir Keir hands the authoritarian lanyard to Andy. The Free Speech Union will be watching closely. Watch Lord Young’s reaction to the Prime Minister’s resignation below 👇
1:35

The Free Speech Union has mixed feelings about Sir Keir Starmer’s departure as Prime Minister. On the one hand, he was no friend of free speech. On the other, he has been an outstanding recruiting sergeant for the FSU. Since he came to power in July 2024, the Free Speech Union’s membership has grown from 14,000 to 45,000. Unfortunately, we have little faith that Andy Burnham will be any better when it comes to free speech. Burnham has already called for greater restrictions on social media, and the Representation of the People Bill is likely to contain all kinds of threats to free speech. There is also no indication that he will abandon plans to ban “conversion therapy”, legislation that could see parents investigated or even prosecuted for conversations with their gender-confused children. It won’t be long before Sir Keir hands the authoritarian lanyard to Andy. The Free Speech Union will be watching closely. Watch Lord Young’s reaction to the Prime Minister’s resignation below 👇

The Free Speech Union

36,347 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

I’ve been talking to heaps of parents about the U16 Social Media Ban that’s due to commence in about 5 weeks. It seems most parents haven’t told their kids yet about the upcoming ban and a couple of parents weren’t even aware it was happening. As of Dec 10th anyone under the age of 16 is going to lose access to their Facebook, Insta, YouTube and Snapchat accounts. YouTube seems to be the one that is used the most and many parents are simply planning to log their children into their own accounts so that their kids can continue using the platform. The user habits of both parents and kids on the same account is no doubt going to confuse the age assurance predictions that most of these tech companies have implemented for the u16 ban. This will result in parents having to provide identification to prove their age and continued use of their accounts. The government wanting to play parent to both adults and children in Australia means that kids are going to potentially be exposed to more harmful content online and it will also create privacy issues as a result of adults having to supply their ID and other personal information to these data harvesting social platforms. The ban is also going to be rolled out just as most kids are starting the long Summer break which means many children will loose contact and online social interactions with many of their friends and family over the Christmas period. The only positive thing that will results from this is that there will be approx 2.5 million kids who grow up hating the government and its control overreach.
2:09

I’ve been talking to heaps of parents about the U16 Social Media Ban that’s due to commence in about 5 weeks. It seems most parents haven’t told their kids yet about the upcoming ban and a couple of parents weren’t even aware it was happening. As of Dec 10th anyone under the age of 16 is going to lose access to their Facebook, Insta, YouTube and Snapchat accounts. YouTube seems to be the one that is used the most and many parents are simply planning to log their children into their own accounts so that their kids can continue using the platform. The user habits of both parents and kids on the same account is no doubt going to confuse the age assurance predictions that most of these tech companies have implemented for the u16 ban. This will result in parents having to provide identification to prove their age and continued use of their accounts. The government wanting to play parent to both adults and children in Australia means that kids are going to potentially be exposed to more harmful content online and it will also create privacy issues as a result of adults having to supply their ID and other personal information to these data harvesting social platforms. The ban is also going to be rolled out just as most kids are starting the long Summer break which means many children will loose contact and online social interactions with many of their friends and family over the Christmas period. The only positive thing that will results from this is that there will be approx 2.5 million kids who grow up hating the government and its control overreach.

Miss Madeleine

33,809 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

There is nothing more disgusting than a government using a parent's grief as cover to ram through bad law. Emma Mason is being used. You can see just how cruel the government is, on this interview with Deb Knight on A Current Affair last night. Her grief is being abused by governments and the media in Australia to justify removing access to social media from all children under the age of 16. Worse than that, they are using her to justify the most draconian internet access rules in the world, and it’s not just for kids. Every adult in Australia will have to age verify to get online to use sites like YouTube, facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. Emma’s story, and that of her daughter is tragic, but the truth is: banning selective social media access will not stop bullying. It will not save the lives of children, and it does not absolve parental responsibility. Outsourcing parenting to government is both cowardly and foolish. Anyone who caught the ABC Lateline piece from 1975 released on this platform by John Adams earlier this week, would know, the Australian Government does not care about our children. We’ve seen real harm perpetrated on kids at government and government regulated childcare facilities. We see a rise in juvenile crime and weak bail laws, encouraging kids to perpetrate more and more extreme crime, and we know there still exists a culture of coverup when it comes to child harm among the establishment elite. The people who have drafted and passed the social media age ban laws are either not au fait with technology, or worse, they are authoritarian bullies who do not want any criticism from the only outlet available to the public – social media. Most disturbing to me though, is this misconceived belief that parents need the government to ban social media so they can parent their children. That is most certainly not the case. Mason further calls on even more government to provide the resources to help parents copilot the law. Because even she can see that it is an absolute mess that will cause harm. The government is an uncaring and incompetent machine, and most Australians seem completely unaware of those facts. The law only impacts the law abiding, and silly laws make for more lawlessness. The social media age ban and the subsequent requirement for adult identification is a silly law. It is possible to circumvent, and it will be circumvented. It will also breed a culture of lawlessness among our youth, and when they start to get away with these smaller ‘crimes’, they will indeed feel emboldened to test other laws. I am tired of Australian governments using tragedy to take more of our rights and freedoms away. We don’t need the government’s help to parent our children or lull us into the false sense of security that they keep us and our children safe. Go shopping in Melbourne and see how safe you feel. Watching the heartless machine use a mother’s grief is painful. It is disgusting. Albanese, Ley and the rest of the Australian political establishment should be ashamed of themselves, because they know exactly what they are doing. We must not stand for this. We must resist, push back and not comply. It is nothing more than a government sponsored attack on our privacy and free speech. It has nothing to do with child safety. We must parent our own children and educate them on how much we have already lost in the name of security and safety. We must show them that we don’t support the government, and maybe by the time they have grown up and are voting, we can start to elect people who deserve to be in leadership positions. Because the people we have right now are a danger to our future prosperity. This is not Australia. I just want Australia back.
6:13

There is nothing more disgusting than a government using a parent's grief as cover to ram through bad law. Emma Mason is being used. You can see just how cruel the government is, on this interview with Deb Knight on A Current Affair last night. Her grief is being abused by governments and the media in Australia to justify removing access to social media from all children under the age of 16. Worse than that, they are using her to justify the most draconian internet access rules in the world, and it’s not just for kids. Every adult in Australia will have to age verify to get online to use sites like YouTube, facebook, Instagram, TikTok and X. Emma’s story, and that of her daughter is tragic, but the truth is: banning selective social media access will not stop bullying. It will not save the lives of children, and it does not absolve parental responsibility. Outsourcing parenting to government is both cowardly and foolish. Anyone who caught the ABC Lateline piece from 1975 released on this platform by John Adams earlier this week, would know, the Australian Government does not care about our children. We’ve seen real harm perpetrated on kids at government and government regulated childcare facilities. We see a rise in juvenile crime and weak bail laws, encouraging kids to perpetrate more and more extreme crime, and we know there still exists a culture of coverup when it comes to child harm among the establishment elite. The people who have drafted and passed the social media age ban laws are either not au fait with technology, or worse, they are authoritarian bullies who do not want any criticism from the only outlet available to the public – social media. Most disturbing to me though, is this misconceived belief that parents need the government to ban social media so they can parent their children. That is most certainly not the case. Mason further calls on even more government to provide the resources to help parents copilot the law. Because even she can see that it is an absolute mess that will cause harm. The government is an uncaring and incompetent machine, and most Australians seem completely unaware of those facts. The law only impacts the law abiding, and silly laws make for more lawlessness. The social media age ban and the subsequent requirement for adult identification is a silly law. It is possible to circumvent, and it will be circumvented. It will also breed a culture of lawlessness among our youth, and when they start to get away with these smaller ‘crimes’, they will indeed feel emboldened to test other laws. I am tired of Australian governments using tragedy to take more of our rights and freedoms away. We don’t need the government’s help to parent our children or lull us into the false sense of security that they keep us and our children safe. Go shopping in Melbourne and see how safe you feel. Watching the heartless machine use a mother’s grief is painful. It is disgusting. Albanese, Ley and the rest of the Australian political establishment should be ashamed of themselves, because they know exactly what they are doing. We must not stand for this. We must resist, push back and not comply. It is nothing more than a government sponsored attack on our privacy and free speech. It has nothing to do with child safety. We must parent our own children and educate them on how much we have already lost in the name of security and safety. We must show them that we don’t support the government, and maybe by the time they have grown up and are voting, we can start to elect people who deserve to be in leadership positions. Because the people we have right now are a danger to our future prosperity. This is not Australia. I just want Australia back.

Matthew Camenzuli

29,745 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.
3:40

I’m afraid I have some terrible news. The governor of America’s largest and richest state has just signed a law that puts 10 million children and adolescents in grave danger of medical mistreatment. The media headlines have it wrong. They claim that California Governor Gavin Newsom’s new law protects children by stopping public schools from outing their new gender to their parents. It does just the opposite. It makes children vulnerable to irreversible and lifelong medical abuse and mistreatment. And it is all based on the pseudoscientific idea that some children are born into the wrong bodies and that we can change a person’s sex through drugs and surgery. For any of this to make sense, you have to understand what’s happening in Britain. Several years ago, the government appointed a well-respected pediatrician named Hillary Cass to investigate whether it was ethical to block the puberty of children, give them opposite-sex hormones, and perform surgeries on their bodies to make them feel better about their gender. Dr. Cass came back a few weeks ago and said no, absolutely not. Around the same time, the British government banned puberty blockers nationwide. And, just a few days ago, the new Labor Party government affirmed that it would maintain the former government’s ban. In her report, Cass said that the so-called “social transition,” whereby a child adopts the identity of the opposite sex, is not a neutral act and has psychological consequences. This means it is the first step toward medical intervention. What Gavin Newsom has done is actively prevented schools from informing parents that their children have been put on a medical pathway. This is an outrageous attack on the rights of children and parents. Children have a right to go through puberty. No adult should be able to block their puberty. And parents have a right to know if their child thinks that they are the opposite sex or were born into the wrong body. We have seen with leaked internal documents of the leading gender medicine group, WPATH, that these medical interventions, namely puberty blockers, hormones, and surgery, are not only irreversible but result in sterilization and loss of sexual function. Children or adolescents are simply not mature enough to understand the effects of so-called “gender-affirming care.” They cannot, in other words, give their informed consent. The new law creates the grave risk that activist teachers, students, and outside groups will convince their children that they were born into the wrong body, and hide their “social transition” from parents, which will lead to harmful medical mistreatment. As such, the law that Newsom just signed is the opposite of what both children and their parents need. We need schools to immediately warn parents if their children think they are the opposite sex. After all, this is a diagnosable psychiatric condition known as “gender dysphoria.” And if your child has a psychiatric disorder, whether anxiety, depression, an eating disorder, or gender dysphoria, you have a right to know. And schools must stop teaching children, or allowing other people to teach children, the pseudoscientific and dehumanizing ideas that it’s possible to be born into the wrong body and possible to change one’s sex. As such, either the legislature, the courts, or a ballot initiative will be required to nullify Newsom’s law. Until then, it is important to spread the word to parents that California public schools are fundamentally unsafe for the millions of children who attend them.

Michael Shellenberger

28,542,506 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

“The Government are constantly trying to sell so many policies on the grounds that they’ll either protect children or protect women and girls, meanwhile they let rapists and child murderers out of prison.” The social media ban for under-16s poses all manner of practical and moral questions. A primary concern is that the Government intends to give the vote to under-16s while, under the ban, preventing them from accessing key content that could help them make an informed decision at the ballot box. Social media is often compared to cigarettes and alcohol — two things that children are prohibited from accessing. There is an interesting philosophical argument about the age at which someone acquires the full suite of rights that comes with maturity, including the right to free speech. On top of that, there are significant inconsistencies in what the Government considers appropriate for children aged 16 and under. One of the most striking examples is puberty blockers. How can a 15-year-old be trusted to embark on an irreversible medical pathway but not be trusted to access social media? Watch Free Speech Union General Secretary Lord Young of Acton on the latest episode of the FSU Podcast 👇
2:04

“The Government are constantly trying to sell so many policies on the grounds that they’ll either protect children or protect women and girls, meanwhile they let rapists and child murderers out of prison.” The social media ban for under-16s poses all manner of practical and moral questions. A primary concern is that the Government intends to give the vote to under-16s while, under the ban, preventing them from accessing key content that could help them make an informed decision at the ballot box. Social media is often compared to cigarettes and alcohol — two things that children are prohibited from accessing. There is an interesting philosophical argument about the age at which someone acquires the full suite of rights that comes with maturity, including the right to free speech. On top of that, there are significant inconsistencies in what the Government considers appropriate for children aged 16 and under. One of the most striking examples is puberty blockers. How can a 15-year-old be trusted to embark on an irreversible medical pathway but not be trusted to access social media? Watch Free Speech Union General Secretary Lord Young of Acton on the latest episode of the FSU Podcast 👇

The Free Speech Union

18,495 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.
1:28

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,750 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 BREAKING: I just introduced legislation in the Ohio House to BAN state agencies from taking action against parents who refuse to allow their children to change their gender. While states like California are turning themselves into "refuges" for children with gender dysphoria, Ohio will protect the innocence of our kids and the rights of parents to raise them. Proud to partner with my colleague Rep. Rep Gary Click 🇺🇸 💯👍 on the Affirming Families First Act.
2:49

🚨 BREAKING: I just introduced legislation in the Ohio House to BAN state agencies from taking action against parents who refuse to allow their children to change their gender. While states like California are turning themselves into "refuges" for children with gender dysphoria, Ohio will protect the innocence of our kids and the rights of parents to raise them. Proud to partner with my colleague Rep. Rep Gary Click 🇺🇸 💯👍 on the Affirming Families First Act.

Rep. Josh Williams

340,884 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Months later, I was right and they are wrong!!! Just fix what your promised and stop the talking… When I tell you these NDC party and government are a scam, believe cos I know what I am talking about. A few weeks to elections, they together with their friends like Osagyefo Oliver Barker-Vormawor calling for a ban on small scale mining. I disagreed and I still disagree today cos I don’t think it’s a strategy that provides long term solution. The NPP government placed a 20months ban on small scale mining between April 2017 - December 2018, it worked temporarily until it was lifted and we went back to ground zero. Ban isn’t a sustainable strategy, it has been tried before and a new approach is needed. The NDC and their friends insisted the ban was the way to go and they went ahead to actually make a 120 day social contract with Ghanaians to ban small scale mining. Today, they are in government and the NDC are running away from the same thing they fought me on but insisted was the way to go. The people are simply calling on you to do as promised. Your call now! And Guess what, their political allies who were on streets for weeks in the name of freedom fighters and insisted on a ban are today demonstrating and no longer calling for the ban. Today, they are no more calling for a ban but baby sitting their Friends in Government and telling them to end Galamsey before their Presidential primaries. It’s 2025, and I have won the debate on the ban against small scale mining. If the NDC think it’s the way to go as they disagreed with me in the past, then they shld go ahead and implement the ban. The NDC have a founding history with enabling Galamsey and some of us knew it long ago, said it and it’s playing out in plain sight. Dear government, you asked for evidence and we have just served the evidence. Deal with Galamsey! #GalamseyEnablers
2:15

Months later, I was right and they are wrong!!! Just fix what your promised and stop the talking… When I tell you these NDC party and government are a scam, believe cos I know what I am talking about. A few weeks to elections, they together with their friends like Osagyefo Oliver Barker-Vormawor calling for a ban on small scale mining. I disagreed and I still disagree today cos I don’t think it’s a strategy that provides long term solution. The NPP government placed a 20months ban on small scale mining between April 2017 - December 2018, it worked temporarily until it was lifted and we went back to ground zero. Ban isn’t a sustainable strategy, it has been tried before and a new approach is needed. The NDC and their friends insisted the ban was the way to go and they went ahead to actually make a 120 day social contract with Ghanaians to ban small scale mining. Today, they are in government and the NDC are running away from the same thing they fought me on but insisted was the way to go. The people are simply calling on you to do as promised. Your call now! And Guess what, their political allies who were on streets for weeks in the name of freedom fighters and insisted on a ban are today demonstrating and no longer calling for the ban. Today, they are no more calling for a ban but baby sitting their Friends in Government and telling them to end Galamsey before their Presidential primaries. It’s 2025, and I have won the debate on the ban against small scale mining. If the NDC think it’s the way to go as they disagreed with me in the past, then they shld go ahead and implement the ban. The NDC have a founding history with enabling Galamsey and some of us knew it long ago, said it and it’s playing out in plain sight. Dear government, you asked for evidence and we have just served the evidence. Deal with Galamsey! #GalamseyEnablers

Dennis Edward Aboagye

26,962 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Alot of people ask me to come and speak at their school board meetings, while I can attend some of them, many are just to far on the weekdays So here's my speech for you to read or play my video for your board on guidance 5756, hope it helps you ----------------------------------- Thank you for giving me a chance to speak today, Just want to touch of the subject of guidance 5756 Our children are be relentlessly bombarded by gender indoctrination on a level never seen before. From the new sex ed curriculum pushed by the state to your library books If you didnt know it parents, Over the summer our state New Jersey Boe recently passed policy to remove the words male and female from schools Here are some misconceptions about 5756, it is not policy but always was guidance, you will not lose state funding if you abolish it, trans kids are still protected under LAD even if you abolish Many think 5756 is LGBTQ outline guidance, it is narrowly targeted towards trans students The guidance essentially boils down to the response a school should undertake if a student thinks they are trans: they would like to be addressed by a name other than their legal one/identify with a pronoun/gender not corresponding to their biological sex The guidance also advises: the school district may seek a variety of professionals, including counselors/school psychologists Will these counselors tell kids after sex reassignment surgery they are 5x more likely to have made a suicide attempt & 19x more likely to have died from suicide It would be a mistake in the 1st place for any board to take on this policy based purely on if something happened to the child or got forbid died, you the board would be sued. Are you truly willing to take that risk? Garden State Equality pushes for programs in schools and GSA groups (Gender Sexuality Alliances) to push the agenda further Hackensack is having pride events all year with gsa activities and woodstown is hosting a series of events as well Our kids are very impressionable and what to please us, mental health issues are being accelerated pushing this as well, kids are utterly confused, especially my own and Countless others I talk to around the state I would like to stress the engagement aspect of sexual influence on any child under the age of 18 the definition of influence over a child stated in Title 9, specifically 6-1 The performing on any indecent, immoral or unlawful act or deed, in the presence of a child that may debauch, or endanger or degrade the morals of the child Think about this child abuse law as the government and our Schools push this gender agenda We need to be teaching these kids, not indoctrinating our students with endless gender ideology What I'm asking is simple, bring up a vote to remove this guidance. If you truly care about the children, you'll stop keeping parents in the dark about what's happening to their kids Parents, it you want this guidance removed, I encourage you to email and speak out to your board. They don't know you have concerns unless you voice them Lastly Always remember this fact, You are not our kids parents, we are, it's best never forget that as you try to hide information from the parents with this guidance Thank you ------------------------------------ Speech and video is just under 3 minutes, so it'll work at any BOE Rally your fellow #NewJersey parents, and keep pushing back on issues that affect you
2:59

Alot of people ask me to come and speak at their school board meetings, while I can attend some of them, many are just to far on the weekdays So here's my speech for you to read or play my video for your board on guidance 5756, hope it helps you ----------------------------------- Thank you for giving me a chance to speak today, Just want to touch of the subject of guidance 5756 Our children are be relentlessly bombarded by gender indoctrination on a level never seen before. From the new sex ed curriculum pushed by the state to your library books If you didnt know it parents, Over the summer our state New Jersey Boe recently passed policy to remove the words male and female from schools Here are some misconceptions about 5756, it is not policy but always was guidance, you will not lose state funding if you abolish it, trans kids are still protected under LAD even if you abolish Many think 5756 is LGBTQ outline guidance, it is narrowly targeted towards trans students The guidance essentially boils down to the response a school should undertake if a student thinks they are trans: they would like to be addressed by a name other than their legal one/identify with a pronoun/gender not corresponding to their biological sex The guidance also advises: the school district may seek a variety of professionals, including counselors/school psychologists Will these counselors tell kids after sex reassignment surgery they are 5x more likely to have made a suicide attempt & 19x more likely to have died from suicide It would be a mistake in the 1st place for any board to take on this policy based purely on if something happened to the child or got forbid died, you the board would be sued. Are you truly willing to take that risk? Garden State Equality pushes for programs in schools and GSA groups (Gender Sexuality Alliances) to push the agenda further Hackensack is having pride events all year with gsa activities and woodstown is hosting a series of events as well Our kids are very impressionable and what to please us, mental health issues are being accelerated pushing this as well, kids are utterly confused, especially my own and Countless others I talk to around the state I would like to stress the engagement aspect of sexual influence on any child under the age of 18 the definition of influence over a child stated in Title 9, specifically 6-1 The performing on any indecent, immoral or unlawful act or deed, in the presence of a child that may debauch, or endanger or degrade the morals of the child Think about this child abuse law as the government and our Schools push this gender agenda We need to be teaching these kids, not indoctrinating our students with endless gender ideology What I'm asking is simple, bring up a vote to remove this guidance. If you truly care about the children, you'll stop keeping parents in the dark about what's happening to their kids Parents, it you want this guidance removed, I encourage you to email and speak out to your board. They don't know you have concerns unless you voice them Lastly Always remember this fact, You are not our kids parents, we are, it's best never forget that as you try to hide information from the parents with this guidance Thank you ------------------------------------ Speech and video is just under 3 minutes, so it'll work at any BOE Rally your fellow #NewJersey parents, and keep pushing back on issues that affect you

Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

23,462 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Listen to Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour’s Minister for Digital Economy) struggling to find the words, trying to justify the government’s social media ban and power grip on young people and families. This government wants to give 16-year-olds the right to vote. Fair enough. But at the same time it pushes the ban for under-16s enforced by digital ID. They want to reserve the right for the government to decide what is “reliable” news, where and how it is consumed - depriving young people of the chance to discuss, decide and make up their own minds. Orwell told us, this is indoctrination and that is unworthy of any democracy.
0:46

Listen to Baroness Lloyd of Effra (Labour’s Minister for Digital Economy) struggling to find the words, trying to justify the government’s social media ban and power grip on young people and families. This government wants to give 16-year-olds the right to vote. Fair enough. But at the same time it pushes the ban for under-16s enforced by digital ID. They want to reserve the right for the government to decide what is “reliable” news, where and how it is consumed - depriving young people of the chance to discuss, decide and make up their own minds. Orwell told us, this is indoctrination and that is unworthy of any democracy.

Marx de Morais

32,085 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"
1:39

Beth Rigby, "You say that you won't compromise on the happiness of children, but you also know US big tech will hate this ban" "Are you concerned about how President Trump might react to this when you see him at the G7 and the consequences for the UK?" Keir Starmer, "This is about fighting for what we think is right" "I'm a fan of tech and AI, I think it has huge capabilities to change our world for the better, that's why I made a pro AI and tech speech at London Tech Week" "I do not accept that you can't be pro tech and AI and at the same time say we must protect our children" "The innovation is incredible in tech and AI. Don't tell me that's impossible for those innovators to devise a way to protect our children" "You can be pro AI and tech which I am, but also pro protecting our children which I am"

Farrukh

122,452 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

In England, The National Health Services closed down their child gender clinic. They do not have enough evidence to show that pausing puberty, chemically castrating, and amputating the body parts of minors is the best thing to do for their mental health. Official medical guidelines are being updated in Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, and France to pump the brakes on the new gay conversion therapy. But the USA is embracing child sexual mutilation. Despite this horrid medical scandal being outlawed in states across the nation, Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine still insists on lying about the "overwhelming science and evidence." There is no overwhelming evidence. They are experimenting on children who will most likely just grow up to be gay adults. We have had ENOUGH of the abuse and atrocities being committed in our name. There is NO PRIDE in sterilizing and mutilating children.
1:33

In England, The National Health Services closed down their child gender clinic. They do not have enough evidence to show that pausing puberty, chemically castrating, and amputating the body parts of minors is the best thing to do for their mental health. Official medical guidelines are being updated in Sweden, Norway, Switzerland, and France to pump the brakes on the new gay conversion therapy. But the USA is embracing child sexual mutilation. Despite this horrid medical scandal being outlawed in states across the nation, Assistant Secretary for Health Rachel Levine still insists on lying about the "overwhelming science and evidence." There is no overwhelming evidence. They are experimenting on children who will most likely just grow up to be gay adults. We have had ENOUGH of the abuse and atrocities being committed in our name. There is NO PRIDE in sterilizing and mutilating children.

Gays Against Groomers

283,881 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

🚨 BREAKING: A sitting "Conservative" elected official in Canada just said that opposing a law that makes it easier for children to transition to a different gender, is "too divisive." According to a current law, children can more easily undergo gender transition without parental consent, and therapists cannot help someone who is struggling with homosexuality in anyway, since they will then face criminal charges. Watch the FULL exchange below on the Conservative Party of Canada's stance on conversion therapy. 👇
3:02

🚨 BREAKING: A sitting "Conservative" elected official in Canada just said that opposing a law that makes it easier for children to transition to a different gender, is "too divisive." According to a current law, children can more easily undergo gender transition without parental consent, and therapists cannot help someone who is struggling with homosexuality in anyway, since they will then face criminal charges. Watch the FULL exchange below on the Conservative Party of Canada's stance on conversion therapy. 👇

mistersunshinebaby

114,873 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🔥 Parents shouldn’t have to put their babies & young kids in childcare with strangers full time just to survive the high cost of living in Australia. The Labor Government has been talking about free childcare…. How about making it affordable for a parent to be able to stay home, care for & raise their own children. This is not good for babies & young children but most parents have no choice 💔
0:53

🔥 Parents shouldn’t have to put their babies & young kids in childcare with strangers full time just to survive the high cost of living in Australia. The Labor Government has been talking about free childcare…. How about making it affordable for a parent to be able to stay home, care for & raise their own children. This is not good for babies & young children but most parents have no choice 💔

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

41,470 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr