正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Cooking the Climate Data See that white louvered box? Since November 2017, Sydney’s official temperatures have been recorded inside it at Observatory Hill. The screen is sited in what is the hottest available location at Observatory Hill, with heat reflecting from the adjacent old stone building and its tin...

92,580 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

NEW VIDEO : How the BOM has doctored Australia’s climate record by shrinking the size of the Stevenson Screens. The Bureau of Meteorology has systematically replaced the larger sized Stevenson screens (the white louvered box that houses the thermometers) traditionally used throughout Australia with small Stevenson Screens. The peer-reviewed science has found that such a trick artificially measures higher temperatures on average by 0.54°C over 12 months and up 1.7°C in summer. But the BOM denies the peer-reviewed science and asserts that such an equipment change has had no effect on measured temperatures. Accurate measurement of Australia’s temperatures and accurate comparisons with past temperatures is critical. I call on the BOM to run a series of independent tests at several different geographic locations comparing temperature readings from large and small screens placed side by side. Surely they have nothing to hide ? "Real action on climate change" could be as simple as going back to the original large screens - for if the peer reviewed study is correct, this would reduce temperatures in Australia the middle of summer by almost 1°C No doubt these facts will trigger anti-science climatards that see any questioning of the BOM’s methods as an attack on their religion. NB : Also see Table 5 in the attached link which shows the dates when the BOM ripped out the larger screens and replaced them with the smaller screens.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

101,359 次观看 • 2 年前

David Friedberg: Michael Burry’s Datacenter Math is Wrong “I actually think Michael Burberry's got this wrong.” “What Michael Burry is saying is that all of these hyperscalers have extended their depreciation schedule or the useful life of their data centers by roughly 2x, which cuts the operating costs in half when they report it in earnings. And so it's making their earnings inflate.” “So he's claiming they're cooking the books. Google first made this change in Q1 of 2021, where they said the servers are now going from 3 to 4 years. Separately in 2021, Google took networking equipment from 3 to 5 years. And then in 2023, they took it from 5 to 6 years.” “And so this is a result of this effort where they went in and did an analysis. So what happened?” “What happened in the data centers is that the data centers transitioned from being primarily data storage and data transfer systems, where you would use hard drives and RAM and memory to store data and then transmit it back out, to being data processing centers because of the AI boom.” “So as AI became more important in the data center, more of the dollars that are going into data centers were allocated towards chips from data storage, which initially was hard drives.” “And then suddenly, when you put these processors in to process the data to do AI, the majority of the spend and the majority of the energy is going towards the processors.” “I made some calls and I checked around with some other friends, and everyone says the same thing: that these 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs that are sitting in the data centers are still being used and they're being used at 100% utilization.” “So that actually justifies and validates the depreciation schedule being much longer versus shorter.”

The All-In Podcast

304,297 次观看 • 8 个月前