Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

CryptoKaleo claims MicroStrategy is trapped in an endless cycle that is hurting its shareholders "They are diluting $MSTR holders directly to pay the bill for everything else." "They're buying the Bitcoin as a mask to be able to say, 'Hey, we're still buying Bitcoin,' but they're not increasing Bitcoin... show more

Fibonacci 🥷

6,361 subscribers

57,921 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

If Bitcoin keeps going down, will MicroStrategy end up like FTX? Pio and Kaleo discuss the future of MicroStrategy. Pio: "Do you realistically think that $MSTR is going to have to sell 50,000 Bitcoin in the next two years?" Kaleo: "More, and I think it's their best option. They have made it their clear mission that they want to increase net Bitcoin, but what does that necessarily do to create value for $MSTR holders?" "I just think it's reckless right now, the way that $MSTR and the other assets are being advertised... MSTR is amplified Bitcoin... it's just a fancy word for saying it's leveraged." "You can also lose a lot more on the way down... they can't get rid of those dividends unless they buy $STRC back... the obligations accrue; they don't go away." "Look at what happened with FTX. Did anybody think that Bitcoin was going to go back down to 16k?... No. As Bitcoin price goes down, the MSTR compression of their multiple continues to go down."

If Bitcoin keeps going down, will MicroStrategy end up like FTX? Pio and Kaleo discuss the future of MicroStrategy. Pio: "Do you realistically think that $MSTR is going to have to sell 50,000 Bitcoin in the next two years?" Kaleo: "More, and I think it's their best option. They have made it their clear mission that they want to increase net Bitcoin, but what does that necessarily do to create value for $MSTR holders?" "I just think it's reckless right now, the way that $MSTR and the other assets are being advertised... MSTR is amplified Bitcoin... it's just a fancy word for saying it's leveraged." "You can also lose a lot more on the way down... they can't get rid of those dividends unless they buy $STRC back... the obligations accrue; they don't go away." "Look at what happened with FTX. Did anybody think that Bitcoin was going to go back down to 16k?... No. As Bitcoin price goes down, the MSTR compression of their multiple continues to go down."

Fibonacci 🥷

40,287 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"

The Wolf Of All Streets

36,187 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🔥SAYLOR MSTR DILUTION PANIC! DILUTION BEARS DESTROYED!🔥 Everyone is FREAKING OUT over MSTR DILUTION. What if I told you that this FUD was TOTAL RIDICULOUS NONSENSE? The BEARS are either LOSING THEIR MINDS or they cannot do SIMPLE MATH. Or they think Bitcoin is going to zero. In that case, now know how seriously we need to take these people. MSTR DILUTION FUD DESTROYED:

🔥SAYLOR MSTR DILUTION PANIC! DILUTION BEARS DESTROYED!🔥 Everyone is FREAKING OUT over MSTR DILUTION. What if I told you that this FUD was TOTAL RIDICULOUS NONSENSE? The BEARS are either LOSING THEIR MINDS or they cannot do SIMPLE MATH. Or they think Bitcoin is going to zero. In that case, now know how seriously we need to take these people. MSTR DILUTION FUD DESTROYED:

Adam Livingston

30,398 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Metaplanet froze its executive share pool after it grew 595% through shareholder dilution "So Metaplanet performed exceptionally well, it was one of the darlings of the treasury boom." "The problem here is that they have an executive pool of shares that was pegged not at a fixed amount but at 20% of the company's fully diluted share capital." "If you understand how treasury companies work, they effectively dilute shareholders by creating more shares and selling those to buy Bitcoin, which works exceptionally well when mNAV is high and increases Bitcoin per share." "Well they pegged it at 20%. So what happens is every time that they made new shares to dilute shareholders to buy Bitcoin, they were also effectively diluting shareholders to pad their own pockets with the shares in that executive pool that rose with it." "They said in their own filing that the mechanism amplifies the dilution borne by existing shareholders." "They froze it in August because they realized it was so bad at 319.464 million executive shares. That pool started at 46.5 million shares." "The pool of executive shares grew by approximately 273.5 million shares, which is nearly seven times its original size, an increase of roughly 595%."

Metaplanet froze its executive share pool after it grew 595% through shareholder dilution "So Metaplanet performed exceptionally well, it was one of the darlings of the treasury boom." "The problem here is that they have an executive pool of shares that was pegged not at a fixed amount but at 20% of the company's fully diluted share capital." "If you understand how treasury companies work, they effectively dilute shareholders by creating more shares and selling those to buy Bitcoin, which works exceptionally well when mNAV is high and increases Bitcoin per share." "Well they pegged it at 20%. So what happens is every time that they made new shares to dilute shareholders to buy Bitcoin, they were also effectively diluting shareholders to pad their own pockets with the shares in that executive pool that rose with it." "They said in their own filing that the mechanism amplifies the dilution borne by existing shareholders." "They froze it in August because they realized it was so bad at 319.464 million executive shares. That pool started at 46.5 million shares." "The pool of executive shares grew by approximately 273.5 million shares, which is nearly seven times its original size, an increase of roughly 595%."

The Wolf Of All Streets

34,861 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🔥MASSIVE BULLISH MSTR NEWS - 5 NEW ANNOUNCEMENTS! 🔥 Strategy just raised $1.15 BILLION for the USD reserve in a manner that was ACCRETIVE to MSTR shareholders. They also announced a new DIGITAL CREDIT CAPITAL FRAMEWORK... with FIVE MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES on how they will continue operating their Bitcoin treasury strategy. MSTR is back to trading at a premium. STRC is up 11%. THE BEARS ARE INSANE PEOPLE. FULL ANALYSIS/BREAKDOWN:

🔥MASSIVE BULLISH MSTR NEWS - 5 NEW ANNOUNCEMENTS! 🔥 Strategy just raised $1.15 BILLION for the USD reserve in a manner that was ACCRETIVE to MSTR shareholders. They also announced a new DIGITAL CREDIT CAPITAL FRAMEWORK... with FIVE MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES on how they will continue operating their Bitcoin treasury strategy. MSTR is back to trading at a premium. STRC is up 11%. THE BEARS ARE INSANE PEOPLE. FULL ANALYSIS/BREAKDOWN:

Adam Livingston

40,017 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🔥MSTR WILL BE WORTH TRILLIONS - SHAREHOLDERS ARE THE NEW WEALTHY ELITE🔥 In this video, I break down why Strategy, ticker MSTR, will become one the most important public company on Earth. Most people look at MSTR and scream about mNAV, dilution, debt, preferreds, and premiums like they just discovered a calculator in a gas station bathroom. But the real question is simple: How much Bitcoin economically belongs to common shareholders after senior claims? When you factor in STRC, preferred capital, senior claims, common issuance, and Bitcoin appreciation, the upside starts looking genuinely absurd. In this video, I break down: Why Bitcoin looks historically cheap versus its 4-year moving average How Strategy’s current Bitcoin stack could be worth $1 trillion by 2030 How STRC can function as a Bitcoin accumulation engine Why Strategy has multiple paths to a trillion-dollar valuation ...and why MSTR shareholders will become the new wealthy elite:

🔥MSTR WILL BE WORTH TRILLIONS - SHAREHOLDERS ARE THE NEW WEALTHY ELITE🔥 In this video, I break down why Strategy, ticker MSTR, will become one the most important public company on Earth. Most people look at MSTR and scream about mNAV, dilution, debt, preferreds, and premiums like they just discovered a calculator in a gas station bathroom. But the real question is simple: How much Bitcoin economically belongs to common shareholders after senior claims? When you factor in STRC, preferred capital, senior claims, common issuance, and Bitcoin appreciation, the upside starts looking genuinely absurd. In this video, I break down: Why Bitcoin looks historically cheap versus its 4-year moving average How Strategy’s current Bitcoin stack could be worth $1 trillion by 2030 How STRC can function as a Bitcoin accumulation engine Why Strategy has multiple paths to a trillion-dollar valuation ...and why MSTR shareholders will become the new wealthy elite:

Adam Livingston

23,786 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Threadguy explains why the market won't let Bitcoin recover while Saylor's still in "If you put a gun to your head and asked what makes a real emphatic bottom for Bitcoin, it's Strategy deleveraging, forced selling of the Bitcoin, and Michael Saylor on trial for financial crimes. That's a bottom right there." "Strategy has $1.7 billion promised annually to the end of time. Out of 5,000 public companies in America, maybe 100 make $1.7 billion in profit a year, and Strategy owes that forever. They're only worth their balance sheet in Bitcoin and they can't sell the Bitcoin. The whole bit is earnings per share, but the only way they earn is by selling more Strategy, and that only works if Bitcoin goes up, which it can't while Saylor's still in. So the market is just saying say uncle."

Threadguy explains why the market won't let Bitcoin recover while Saylor's still in "If you put a gun to your head and asked what makes a real emphatic bottom for Bitcoin, it's Strategy deleveraging, forced selling of the Bitcoin, and Michael Saylor on trial for financial crimes. That's a bottom right there." "Strategy has $1.7 billion promised annually to the end of time. Out of 5,000 public companies in America, maybe 100 make $1.7 billion in profit a year, and Strategy owes that forever. They're only worth their balance sheet in Bitcoin and they can't sell the Bitcoin. The whole bit is earnings per share, but the only way they earn is by selling more Strategy, and that only works if Bitcoin goes up, which it can't while Saylor's still in. So the market is just saying say uncle."

Kai

52,699 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"Only about 61% of the common stock they sold this week went to purchase Bitcoin" Here's where the other 39% of Strategy's raise went: "They raised $602 million and bought $370 million worth of Bitcoin. It was divided four ways. $370 million bought Bitcoin, $151 million repurchased STRC shares, working very hard to push that back up to par at $100. $50.7 million paid STRC dividends, and they already have over $5 billion saved for that." "The fact that they're paying them in real time and have it saved means your concerns about STRC should be over. And they used $30 million to increase the USD cash, so they actually added to the cash reserve while buying Bitcoin." "The remainder supported the preferred stock structure and their liquidity."

"Only about 61% of the common stock they sold this week went to purchase Bitcoin" Here's where the other 39% of Strategy's raise went: "They raised $602 million and bought $370 million worth of Bitcoin. It was divided four ways. $370 million bought Bitcoin, $151 million repurchased STRC shares, working very hard to push that back up to par at $100. $50.7 million paid STRC dividends, and they already have over $5 billion saved for that." "The fact that they're paying them in real time and have it saved means your concerns about STRC should be over. And they used $30 million to increase the USD cash, so they actually added to the cash reserve while buying Bitcoin." "The remainder supported the preferred stock structure and their liquidity."

The Wolf Of All Streets

28,854 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY - BITCOIN WILL FLIP GOLD🔥 Think Bitcoin is going to eventually flip gold as the world's #1 asset? In that case, you should be bullish on $MSTR! NAPKIN MATH: Let's make it simple with 20 million circulating BTC and gold also sees some inflows so it's $40T by the time the BTC flippening of gold happens. $40T / 20 million = $2 million per Bitcoin. When does this happen? No idea. Let's say it happens in 2038. Let's say zero MSTR mNAV expansion. Zero new Bitcoin acquired. They pay 12% on STRC until then. Dividends paid with MSTR issuance. They pay 0.55% on their debt and it never goes away (lol). RESULT: Bitcoin goes from $62,875 to $2 million. BTC return: 31.81x MSTR goes from $93.28 to approximately $4,253. MSTR return: 45.60x Again: Zero new Bitcoin acquired. Zero mNAV expansion. The preferreds remain outstanding. The debt remains outstanding. MSTR spends approximately $22.7 billion servicing STRC dividends and debt interest over the 12 years, entirely through common-stock issuance. And MSTR still outperforms Bitcoin. HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN? At the beginning, MSTR’s net senior claims equal approximately 292,251 BTC. At $2 million per Bitcoin, those exact same dollar claims equal only 9,188 BTC. The liabilities never disappear. They simply get beaten within an inch of their economic lives by the denominator. That releases approximately 283,064 BTC of residual value to the common equity without Strategy purchasing one additional sat. Common shareholders’ residual claim rises: 551,524 BTC → 834,587 BTC Paying 12 years of dividends and interest through MSTR issuance increases the share count by only: 384.6 million → 406.0 million Just 5.6% dilution. So CEBE per share rises: 143,404 sats → 205,562 sats That is 43.3% growth in claims-adjusted Bitcoin exposure per share while the gross Bitcoin treasury remains completely unchanged. The return equation becomes: 31.81x BTC appreciation × 1.433x CEBE-per-share growth × 1.00x mNAV change = 45.60x MSTR $10,000 invested in Bitcoin becomes approximately $318,000. $10,000 invested in MSTR becomes approximately. $456,000 MSTR creates roughly $138,000 of additional terminal wealth on the same $10,000 investment while buying zero additional Bitcoin. This is the part MSTR bears cannot process because their mental model of a capital structure is a shoebox with the word “DEBT” written on the lid in crayon. MSTR is not merely a static jar of Bitcoin. Common shareholders own the residual claim behind fixed-fiat liabilities wrapped around scarce collateral. As Bitcoin appreciates, those dollar liabilities consume fewer sats. The value released by that compression flows to common equity. At $2 million Bitcoin, the debt is still technically there. It just has the economic significance of a parking ticket taped to an aircraft carrier. The Bitcoin flippening would not merely dethrone gold. It would turn MSTR’s capital structure into a 12 year public execution of the dollar denominator:

🔥STRATEGY WILL BE THE WORLD'S MOST VALUABLE COMPANY - BITCOIN WILL FLIP GOLD🔥 Think Bitcoin is going to eventually flip gold as the world's #1 asset? In that case, you should be bullish on $MSTR! NAPKIN MATH: Let's make it simple with 20 million circulating BTC and gold also sees some inflows so it's $40T by the time the BTC flippening of gold happens. $40T / 20 million = $2 million per Bitcoin. When does this happen? No idea. Let's say it happens in 2038. Let's say zero MSTR mNAV expansion. Zero new Bitcoin acquired. They pay 12% on STRC until then. Dividends paid with MSTR issuance. They pay 0.55% on their debt and it never goes away (lol). RESULT: Bitcoin goes from $62,875 to $2 million. BTC return: 31.81x MSTR goes from $93.28 to approximately $4,253. MSTR return: 45.60x Again: Zero new Bitcoin acquired. Zero mNAV expansion. The preferreds remain outstanding. The debt remains outstanding. MSTR spends approximately $22.7 billion servicing STRC dividends and debt interest over the 12 years, entirely through common-stock issuance. And MSTR still outperforms Bitcoin. HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN? At the beginning, MSTR’s net senior claims equal approximately 292,251 BTC. At $2 million per Bitcoin, those exact same dollar claims equal only 9,188 BTC. The liabilities never disappear. They simply get beaten within an inch of their economic lives by the denominator. That releases approximately 283,064 BTC of residual value to the common equity without Strategy purchasing one additional sat. Common shareholders’ residual claim rises: 551,524 BTC → 834,587 BTC Paying 12 years of dividends and interest through MSTR issuance increases the share count by only: 384.6 million → 406.0 million Just 5.6% dilution. So CEBE per share rises: 143,404 sats → 205,562 sats That is 43.3% growth in claims-adjusted Bitcoin exposure per share while the gross Bitcoin treasury remains completely unchanged. The return equation becomes: 31.81x BTC appreciation × 1.433x CEBE-per-share growth × 1.00x mNAV change = 45.60x MSTR $10,000 invested in Bitcoin becomes approximately $318,000. $10,000 invested in MSTR becomes approximately. $456,000 MSTR creates roughly $138,000 of additional terminal wealth on the same $10,000 investment while buying zero additional Bitcoin. This is the part MSTR bears cannot process because their mental model of a capital structure is a shoebox with the word “DEBT” written on the lid in crayon. MSTR is not merely a static jar of Bitcoin. Common shareholders own the residual claim behind fixed-fiat liabilities wrapped around scarce collateral. As Bitcoin appreciates, those dollar liabilities consume fewer sats. The value released by that compression flows to common equity. At $2 million Bitcoin, the debt is still technically there. It just has the economic significance of a parking ticket taped to an aircraft carrier. The Bitcoin flippening would not merely dethrone gold. It would turn MSTR’s capital structure into a 12 year public execution of the dollar denominator:

Adam Livingston

24,380 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Literally my whole timeline is about Michael Saylor selling 32 BTC, which leaves them with JUST 843,706. What I do find interesting is the reasoning behind selling 32 BTC. And let me tell you what I think the reason is: $MSTR is so focused on $STRC lately, and a lot of the noise comes from people thinking they won't pay their holders the dividend. Saylor posted his "Working Better" post and the next few posts were about $STRC. First about maintaining the dividend rate at 11.50%. The second post "Our goal is to make $STRC the best credit instrument in the world." Strategy isn't panic selling Bitcoin because they're about to go down. They're selling to reassure STRC holders that Strategy WILL pay you the dividend. Panic over 0.004% of holdings is peak noise. They're paying STRC holders what they promised so the capital machine keeps fueling more Bitcoin.

Literally my whole timeline is about Michael Saylor selling 32 BTC, which leaves them with JUST 843,706. What I do find interesting is the reasoning behind selling 32 BTC. And let me tell you what I think the reason is: $MSTR is so focused on $STRC lately, and a lot of the noise comes from people thinking they won't pay their holders the dividend. Saylor posted his "Working Better" post and the next few posts were about $STRC. First about maintaining the dividend rate at 11.50%. The second post "Our goal is to make $STRC the best credit instrument in the world." Strategy isn't panic selling Bitcoin because they're about to go down. They're selling to reassure STRC holders that Strategy WILL pay you the dividend. Panic over 0.004% of holdings is peak noise. They're paying STRC holders what they promised so the capital machine keeps fueling more Bitcoin.

Marc ₿

143,335 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🔥MSTR DOMINATION - SAYLOR IS WINNING - THE BEARS ARE DESTROYED🔥 Strategy just bought back 48x the Bitcoin they sold. The clowns who called "death spiral" are still in denial. Strategy continues to raise $131 MILLION PER TRADING DAY in 2026. Their annual dividend obligation is made up in 13 TRADING DAYS OF RAISING. Strategy now only needs $94.4k Bitcoin for their Bitcoin NAV to reach an all-time high. This is because despite a huge Bitcoin bear market... Strategy is RAISING CAPITAL FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE. THE BEARS ARE IN DENIAL AND THE HATERS ARE LOSING IT. ONWARD TO THE GREAT ORANGE SINGULARITY:

🔥MSTR DOMINATION - SAYLOR IS WINNING - THE BEARS ARE DESTROYED🔥 Strategy just bought back 48x the Bitcoin they sold. The clowns who called "death spiral" are still in denial. Strategy continues to raise $131 MILLION PER TRADING DAY in 2026. Their annual dividend obligation is made up in 13 TRADING DAYS OF RAISING. Strategy now only needs $94.4k Bitcoin for their Bitcoin NAV to reach an all-time high. This is because despite a huge Bitcoin bear market... Strategy is RAISING CAPITAL FASTER THAN EVER BEFORE. THE BEARS ARE IN DENIAL AND THE HATERS ARE LOSING IT. ONWARD TO THE GREAT ORANGE SINGULARITY:

Adam Livingston

19,015 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Should Strategy proactively sell Bitcoin now to protect shareholders later? Kaleo makes the case for selling, and gets pushback Kaleo: "Issuing MSTR is good here. If they were able to just unload a few billion dollars worth of Bitcoin and say the price didn't move way too much, we are being proactive. If they were able to sell that $1.25 billion of Bitcoin, that's bullish" "You're advocating for destroying shareholder value now to protect shareholder value in the future. Why would we be worried about Strategy being a forced seller if we're not worried about voluntarily selling now? That point I just don't get" Kaleo: "Where else is that 10 to 12 billion dollars coming from? They right now have talked about they are willing to sell the Bitcoin. If they sell some at a higher price, it eases a lot more of the concerns than if we get to 30k and we're in the same situation and they haven't sold any" "I can't get anyone to give me an answer on how much Bitcoin he can sell and why. You have no idea what would happen if he did that. What if he does it and Bitcoin goes to 30 and people are like we're done, he's out? You've destroyed more shareholder value than if Bitcoin just goes to 30, stays there 18 months, and he's forced to sell a couple billion. The most likely scenario is at some point in the next 12 months Bitcoin goes up enough that this isn't a problem"

Should Strategy proactively sell Bitcoin now to protect shareholders later? Kaleo makes the case for selling, and gets pushback Kaleo: "Issuing MSTR is good here. If they were able to just unload a few billion dollars worth of Bitcoin and say the price didn't move way too much, we are being proactive. If they were able to sell that $1.25 billion of Bitcoin, that's bullish" "You're advocating for destroying shareholder value now to protect shareholder value in the future. Why would we be worried about Strategy being a forced seller if we're not worried about voluntarily selling now? That point I just don't get" Kaleo: "Where else is that 10 to 12 billion dollars coming from? They right now have talked about they are willing to sell the Bitcoin. If they sell some at a higher price, it eases a lot more of the concerns than if we get to 30k and we're in the same situation and they haven't sold any" "I can't get anyone to give me an answer on how much Bitcoin he can sell and why. You have no idea what would happen if he did that. What if he does it and Bitcoin goes to 30 and people are like we're done, he's out? You've destroyed more shareholder value than if Bitcoin just goes to 30, stays there 18 months, and he's forced to sell a couple billion. The most likely scenario is at some point in the next 12 months Bitcoin goes up enough that this isn't a problem"

The Wolf Of All Streets

46,399 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Strategy buys 334 $BTC, but the real story is $176M in STRC buybacks, funded partly by interest on its cash pile "The big story here is not that Saylor is once again buying Bitcoin, because we've now seen that sustained for a few weeks, as they bought 334 for $28.7 million, while also spending over, I believe, $176 million buying back STRC." "We've long discussed how complicated the Strategy Bitcoin buying and corporate balance sheet game has become, and that is in the spotlight every single week, because this is not just simply raise cash and buy Bitcoin anymore." "Now it is find creative ways to raise cash and maybe use that cash to buy some of our things while also selling some other things." "The Bitcoin purchase itself was funded from $15.7 million from issuing and selling MSTR shares, so a very, very slight bit of dilution, but that's the old model. Only $13 million came from Strategy's flexible USD cash pool." "What I said is more interesting is the $176.3 million of STRC that they bought. They funded this using $154.1 million of their USD cash pile and $22.2 million of interest earned on its dollar holdings." "They've raised billions and billions and billions of dollars in cash, much like a stablecoin, they could actually earn yield with high interest rates on that cash." "They're putting that cash to work to buy back STRC. This is the first time, to my knowledge, that we've seen that part of the machine kicking in, and it's not something that I'd heard anybody even mentioning."

Strategy buys 334 $BTC, but the real story is $176M in STRC buybacks, funded partly by interest on its cash pile "The big story here is not that Saylor is once again buying Bitcoin, because we've now seen that sustained for a few weeks, as they bought 334 for $28.7 million, while also spending over, I believe, $176 million buying back STRC." "We've long discussed how complicated the Strategy Bitcoin buying and corporate balance sheet game has become, and that is in the spotlight every single week, because this is not just simply raise cash and buy Bitcoin anymore." "Now it is find creative ways to raise cash and maybe use that cash to buy some of our things while also selling some other things." "The Bitcoin purchase itself was funded from $15.7 million from issuing and selling MSTR shares, so a very, very slight bit of dilution, but that's the old model. Only $13 million came from Strategy's flexible USD cash pool." "What I said is more interesting is the $176.3 million of STRC that they bought. They funded this using $154.1 million of their USD cash pile and $22.2 million of interest earned on its dollar holdings." "They've raised billions and billions and billions of dollars in cash, much like a stablecoin, they could actually earn yield with high interest rates on that cash." "They're putting that cash to work to buy back STRC. This is the first time, to my knowledge, that we've seen that part of the machine kicking in, and it's not something that I'd heard anybody even mentioning."

The Wolf Of All Streets

25,640 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

If you buy 1 bitcoin on an exchange (or buy 1 bitcoin directly to cold storage at Unchained), you're not actually buying 1 bitcoin. You're buying 100,000,000 bitcoins. Values in bitcoin are something called 64-bit integers, where 1 coin is represented within Bitcoin Core, the bitcoin software, as 100,000,000 units. Satoshi didn’t suggest we can name these smaller units something else. He suggested we call it bitcoin. Similar to a stock split. The smallest unit is still called a share of Apple, Amazon, or another company, but previous shareholders might receive 2 shares for 1, 8 shares for 1 or even more. So 1 bitcoin really equals 100,000,000 bitcoins.

If you buy 1 bitcoin on an exchange (or buy 1 bitcoin directly to cold storage at Unchained), you're not actually buying 1 bitcoin. You're buying 100,000,000 bitcoins. Values in bitcoin are something called 64-bit integers, where 1 coin is represented within Bitcoin Core, the bitcoin software, as 100,000,000 units. Satoshi didn’t suggest we can name these smaller units something else. He suggested we call it bitcoin. Similar to a stock split. The smallest unit is still called a share of Apple, Amazon, or another company, but previous shareholders might receive 2 shares for 1, 8 shares for 1 or even more. So 1 bitcoin really equals 100,000,000 bitcoins.

Joe Burnett, MSBA

291,300 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Peter Schiff says crypto's support for Trump has made Democrats its enemy, and they'll do whatever they can to go after the industry "Trump's campaign was financed in large part by the crypto industry, and Trump overwhelmingly won the crypto vote by promising to do things specifically to enrich people who own Bitcoin." "You know, I'm gonna establish a Bitcoin reserve. We're gonna use taxpayer money to buy Bitcoin. We're gonna make the United States the Bitcoin capital of the world. I'm a Bitcoin president. I have a Bitcoin cabinet. I have a crypto czar. All the Bitcoin people were enthusiastically supporting Trump because they thought that Trump would make them rich, because Trump was gonna drive up the value of Bitcoin." "The Democrats now are antagonistic, because now they see that Bitcoin is a source of funding for Republicans, a source of votes. So now the Democrats are anti-Bitcoin just for that reason alone, forget about anything else." "They're gonna be very hostile. They're gonna go after Trump's donors. They're gonna go after the industries that support him. They're gonna go after his voters, right? So they're gonna do whatever they can to make things difficult for that industry." "Now, Trump is still the president, but he won't be president for much longer. But a lot of this comes out of Congress. So I think that the tables are gonna turn, and Washington is gonna be more of an enemy than a friend when it comes to Bitcoin."

Peter Schiff says crypto's support for Trump has made Democrats its enemy, and they'll do whatever they can to go after the industry "Trump's campaign was financed in large part by the crypto industry, and Trump overwhelmingly won the crypto vote by promising to do things specifically to enrich people who own Bitcoin." "You know, I'm gonna establish a Bitcoin reserve. We're gonna use taxpayer money to buy Bitcoin. We're gonna make the United States the Bitcoin capital of the world. I'm a Bitcoin president. I have a Bitcoin cabinet. I have a crypto czar. All the Bitcoin people were enthusiastically supporting Trump because they thought that Trump would make them rich, because Trump was gonna drive up the value of Bitcoin." "The Democrats now are antagonistic, because now they see that Bitcoin is a source of funding for Republicans, a source of votes. So now the Democrats are anti-Bitcoin just for that reason alone, forget about anything else." "They're gonna be very hostile. They're gonna go after Trump's donors. They're gonna go after the industries that support him. They're gonna go after his voters, right? So they're gonna do whatever they can to make things difficult for that industry." "Now, Trump is still the president, but he won't be president for much longer. But a lot of this comes out of Congress. So I think that the tables are gonna turn, and Washington is gonna be more of an enemy than a friend when it comes to Bitcoin."

The Wolf Of All Streets

41,373 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

Most people think about Bitcoin treasury companies incorrectly Here is why I think they are good for Bitcoin & why they are misunderstood: 1) Treasury companies are capitalizing the Bitcoin industry for a century to come 2) They are future Bitcoin Banks 3) However, they are developing in the reverse order compared to everything else - monetization first and then later on core business activities -- Bitcoin has traditionally received $1 for every $100 in funds that Crypto took in - it has historically been challenging to raise money for Bitcoin focused businesses. My view is that Treasury companies are changing this, and while the first phase will simply be acquiring as much Bitcoin as possible - they will later need to ensure the value of Bitcoin grows and find ways to use BTC as capital in a larger marketplace. These firms will become the future Bitcoin Banks and also Bitcoin conglomerates. In this exact moment in time the best use of capital is simply buying Bitcoin. It's hard to meaningfully outperform BTC, and as such all these businesses will do for a while is acquire BTC. But eventually that shifts, and these firms will see more incentive to both grow and deploy Bitcoin. They then will provide capital which, among other things, supports Bitcoin businesses and projects. Many people struggle to contextualize the current "land rush" phase with what will come later. You need to take a longer view to understand these firms. The order of operations is also reversed here. Typically you build a business or technology and then as a final step monetize it via an IPO. With Bitcoin, stage 1 is looking more like direct monetization prior to creating value via products, etc. This is deeply counter intuitive to many people in traditional finance, and also to many Bitcoiners. However, because Bitcoin is primarily money at a base level it makes sense the developmental path it is taking differs significantly from other tech. The amount of time it will take for other investors to understand this presents an opportunity for those who see it sooner. More thoughts below 👇

Most people think about Bitcoin treasury companies incorrectly Here is why I think they are good for Bitcoin & why they are misunderstood: 1) Treasury companies are capitalizing the Bitcoin industry for a century to come 2) They are future Bitcoin Banks 3) However, they are developing in the reverse order compared to everything else - monetization first and then later on core business activities -- Bitcoin has traditionally received $1 for every $100 in funds that Crypto took in - it has historically been challenging to raise money for Bitcoin focused businesses. My view is that Treasury companies are changing this, and while the first phase will simply be acquiring as much Bitcoin as possible - they will later need to ensure the value of Bitcoin grows and find ways to use BTC as capital in a larger marketplace. These firms will become the future Bitcoin Banks and also Bitcoin conglomerates. In this exact moment in time the best use of capital is simply buying Bitcoin. It's hard to meaningfully outperform BTC, and as such all these businesses will do for a while is acquire BTC. But eventually that shifts, and these firms will see more incentive to both grow and deploy Bitcoin. They then will provide capital which, among other things, supports Bitcoin businesses and projects. Many people struggle to contextualize the current "land rush" phase with what will come later. You need to take a longer view to understand these firms. The order of operations is also reversed here. Typically you build a business or technology and then as a final step monetize it via an IPO. With Bitcoin, stage 1 is looking more like direct monetization prior to creating value via products, etc. This is deeply counter intuitive to many people in traditional finance, and also to many Bitcoiners. However, because Bitcoin is primarily money at a base level it makes sense the developmental path it is taking differs significantly from other tech. The amount of time it will take for other investors to understand this presents an opportunity for those who see it sooner. More thoughts below 👇

Steven Lubka ☀️

29,287 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

$MSTR Saylor’s response to the Bitcoin monetization framework: “I don’t think there’s a conflict between doing the right thing for Bitcoin, doing the right thing for the equity, doing the right thing for the credit. I think those are all in a dynamic harmony with each other.” Strategy has spent years building its 847,363 BTC balance sheet. That stack exists to create optionality. When the company’s securities become materially mispriced, Bitcoin itself becomes another capital allocation tool. $STRC shareholders don’t measure success by how many Bitcoin the company buys next week. They measure management’s ability to protect the structure, maintain confidence, and continue servicing the product over the long term. $MSTR shareholders understand something equally important. The faster Strategy can rely on $STRC as its primary capital engine, the less dependent it becomes on common equity issuance, making future Bitcoin accumulation increasingly accretive over time. These aren’t competing objectives. Protecting Digital Credit protects access to capital. Access to capital grows the Bitcoin treasury. And a larger Bitcoin treasury gives management even greater flexibility to defend the structure whenever the market misprices it. That’s the dynamic I don’t expect speculators to fully understand. That’s the dynamic that can take this company to a trillion. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

$MSTR Saylor’s response to the Bitcoin monetization framework: “I don’t think there’s a conflict between doing the right thing for Bitcoin, doing the right thing for the equity, doing the right thing for the credit. I think those are all in a dynamic harmony with each other.” Strategy has spent years building its 847,363 BTC balance sheet. That stack exists to create optionality. When the company’s securities become materially mispriced, Bitcoin itself becomes another capital allocation tool. $STRC shareholders don’t measure success by how many Bitcoin the company buys next week. They measure management’s ability to protect the structure, maintain confidence, and continue servicing the product over the long term. $MSTR shareholders understand something equally important. The faster Strategy can rely on $STRC as its primary capital engine, the less dependent it becomes on common equity issuance, making future Bitcoin accumulation increasingly accretive over time. These aren’t competing objectives. Protecting Digital Credit protects access to capital. Access to capital grows the Bitcoin treasury. And a larger Bitcoin treasury gives management even greater flexibility to defend the structure whenever the market misprices it. That’s the dynamic I don’t expect speculators to fully understand. That’s the dynamic that can take this company to a trillion. Mission Strategy. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

Zaid 🟧

13,766 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"There's a very major difference between no choices and no great choices. Right now in the very short term, he doesn't have great choices. But he has plenty of options" "Where people are conflating this on social media is there are people who think it's in a death spiral and it's over" "He has to slightly dilute MicroStrategy shareholders to add back to the cash reserve and buy more Bitcoin. I can see an argument for saying stop buying Bitcoin for a while, bro. That could be rational. I can see an argument that they should have not paid off the convertible note for $1.3 billion because that sparked all of this" "But they're adding back to that cash reserve every single week. I can see all the negative arguments, but he has plenty of options that are slightly dilutive in the short term to shore up the balance sheet"

"There's a very major difference between no choices and no great choices. Right now in the very short term, he doesn't have great choices. But he has plenty of options" "Where people are conflating this on social media is there are people who think it's in a death spiral and it's over" "He has to slightly dilute MicroStrategy shareholders to add back to the cash reserve and buy more Bitcoin. I can see an argument for saying stop buying Bitcoin for a while, bro. That could be rational. I can see an argument that they should have not paid off the convertible note for $1.3 billion because that sparked all of this" "But they're adding back to that cash reserve every single week. I can see all the negative arguments, but he has plenty of options that are slightly dilutive in the short term to shore up the balance sheet"

The Wolf Of All Streets

31,712 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Once again the mainstream media proving that they are either completely incompetent or totally corrupted. Either way, the signal is strong: defund them, and the governments they protect. As I said at BTC Prague: buy bitcoin for freedom go up!

Once again the mainstream media proving that they are either completely incompetent or totally corrupted. Either way, the signal is strong: defund them, and the governments they protect. As I said at BTC Prague: buy bitcoin for freedom go up!

Richard Byworth ∞/21M

24,597 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce