Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Danielle Smith’s Alberta Police Chief Selection Mirrors Corrupt Third World Tactics Alberta’s new police chief, Sat Parhar (aka Satpal Singh Parhar), was chosen by the very board he once chaired. Normally, that would be a textbook conflict of interest — a board hiring its own chair. But at the... time of his appointment, no code of conduct rules existed to stop it. Under Alberta’s own Public Agencies Governance Act (APAGA), such boards are required to have a Code of Conduct in place within three months of being created — and to make it public. Records show this didn’t happen. Instead, the first Code of Conduct was only drafted after Parhar stepped down as chair, and it didn’t come into effect until weeks after he was already announced as chief. Why did Danielle Smith and deputy premier Mike Ellis permit a board without a code of conduct barring conflicts of interest to oversee the process — and then present that process to Albertans as ‘rigorous’ and ‘merit-based’?show more

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

59,508 subscribers

24,144 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

EXCLUSIVE: Sat Parhar Made Police Chief by Board He Chaired, Before Any Conduct Rules Were in Place Government records show that when the board Satpal Singh Parhar once chaired announced him as Alberta’s first Chief of Police on July 2, no code of conduct was in force to prevent a conflict of interest in appointing its own former chairman. This raises questions about what kind of “rigorous, merit-based” hiring process was used by a board that had no Code of Conduct in place at the time — and ultimately selected its own chairman. Will Albertans have an accountable, transparent, and lawful police force loyal to the public that pays them, or an unaccountable force loyal to Chief Parhar—raising concerns about the integrity of death investigations, the risk of organized crime infiltration, and the trust of security agencies who must share intelligence essential to Albertans’ safety. Alberta's UCP government — specifically Minister Mike Ellis — has not responded to repeated media inquiries regarding this matter. Stay tuned for more exclusive investigative journalism you won't find anywhere else Media Bezirgan

EXCLUSIVE: Sat Parhar Made Police Chief by Board He Chaired, Before Any Conduct Rules Were in Place Government records show that when the board Satpal Singh Parhar once chaired announced him as Alberta’s first Chief of Police on July 2, no code of conduct was in force to prevent a conflict of interest in appointing its own former chairman. This raises questions about what kind of “rigorous, merit-based” hiring process was used by a board that had no Code of Conduct in place at the time — and ultimately selected its own chairman. Will Albertans have an accountable, transparent, and lawful police force loyal to the public that pays them, or an unaccountable force loyal to Chief Parhar—raising concerns about the integrity of death investigations, the risk of organized crime infiltration, and the trust of security agencies who must share intelligence essential to Albertans’ safety. Alberta's UCP government — specifically Minister Mike Ellis — has not responded to repeated media inquiries regarding this matter. Stay tuned for more exclusive investigative journalism you won't find anywhere else Media Bezirgan

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

18,422 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

SCANDAL: Alberta’s Police Chief Was Appointed by the Same Board He Chaired Danielle Smith’s government silently went along with the fact that the Independent Agency Police Service Oversight Board, tasked with finding the most qualified Albertan to lead the new provincial police force, chose its own chairman, Satpal Singh Parhar, for the job. Having hidden this critical conflict of interest concerning the safety and security of Albertans has rattled critics, who are now calling for the resignation of Chief Parhar, the entire board, Minister Mike Ellis, and Premier Danielle Smith. Last week, in our in-depth report raising national security concerns about the questionable selection of Chief Parhar—prior to our discovery that he had served as chair—Minister Ellis’s press secretary stated that the process was “independently led by the Independent Agency Police Service Oversight Board and adhered to established public sector protocols for executive-level appointments.” This revelation shatters the credibility of that statement and raises serious questions about integrity, transparency, and accountability at every level of Danielle Smith’s government. If this is what “established public sector protocols” look like, Albertans deserve to know how many other appointments are built on the same foundation of conflict of interest. Chief Parhar, Premier Smith, and Minister Ellis have not responded to our media inquiry, leaving unanswered whether U.S. security agencies were consulted about this appointment—an especially pressing question given Alberta’s shared border with Montana and the persistent threat of transnational crime, including fentanyl trafficking. This investigation is far from over, and Media Bezirgan needs your financial support to continue uncovering this scandal. I’d like to thank law enforcement and Intelligence community for pointing out the fact that Parhar used to be the chair of the board that ultimately appointed him chief.

SCANDAL: Alberta’s Police Chief Was Appointed by the Same Board He Chaired Danielle Smith’s government silently went along with the fact that the Independent Agency Police Service Oversight Board, tasked with finding the most qualified Albertan to lead the new provincial police force, chose its own chairman, Satpal Singh Parhar, for the job. Having hidden this critical conflict of interest concerning the safety and security of Albertans has rattled critics, who are now calling for the resignation of Chief Parhar, the entire board, Minister Mike Ellis, and Premier Danielle Smith. Last week, in our in-depth report raising national security concerns about the questionable selection of Chief Parhar—prior to our discovery that he had served as chair—Minister Ellis’s press secretary stated that the process was “independently led by the Independent Agency Police Service Oversight Board and adhered to established public sector protocols for executive-level appointments.” This revelation shatters the credibility of that statement and raises serious questions about integrity, transparency, and accountability at every level of Danielle Smith’s government. If this is what “established public sector protocols” look like, Albertans deserve to know how many other appointments are built on the same foundation of conflict of interest. Chief Parhar, Premier Smith, and Minister Ellis have not responded to our media inquiry, leaving unanswered whether U.S. security agencies were consulted about this appointment—an especially pressing question given Alberta’s shared border with Montana and the persistent threat of transnational crime, including fentanyl trafficking. This investigation is far from over, and Media Bezirgan needs your financial support to continue uncovering this scandal. I’d like to thank law enforcement and Intelligence community for pointing out the fact that Parhar used to be the chair of the board that ultimately appointed him chief.

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

114,490 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Immigration firms are advertising Danielle Smith’s new pathway for foreigners to police Albertans. “Whether you’re in Nigeria, India, Ghana, Philippines, or any other country in the world this could be the opportunity you’ve been waiting for,” says RCIC-registered immigration consultant Pius Ekwulugo in a YouTube video. This is concerning amid Premier Smith’s government appointing Sat Parhar (a.k.a. Satpal Singh Parhar) as Alberta’s new police chief, whose businesses have official partnerships with immigration firms. Chief Parhar was once accused of nepotism during his time at the Calgary Police Service, where officers he “groomed” were nicknamed “FOS” (Friends of Sat). Chief Parhar’s firm has ties to Nigeria, and he is a vocal advocate for diversity and inclusion. Will Alberta’s new police force become a force of “FOS” who are merely seeking citizenship? How can the integrity of investigations into homicides, transnational drug trafficking, and organized crime be ensured under a police force shaped by Danielle Smith and Satpal Singh Parhar?

Immigration firms are advertising Danielle Smith’s new pathway for foreigners to police Albertans. “Whether you’re in Nigeria, India, Ghana, Philippines, or any other country in the world this could be the opportunity you’ve been waiting for,” says RCIC-registered immigration consultant Pius Ekwulugo in a YouTube video. This is concerning amid Premier Smith’s government appointing Sat Parhar (a.k.a. Satpal Singh Parhar) as Alberta’s new police chief, whose businesses have official partnerships with immigration firms. Chief Parhar was once accused of nepotism during his time at the Calgary Police Service, where officers he “groomed” were nicknamed “FOS” (Friends of Sat). Chief Parhar’s firm has ties to Nigeria, and he is a vocal advocate for diversity and inclusion. Will Alberta’s new police force become a force of “FOS” who are merely seeking citizenship? How can the integrity of investigations into homicides, transnational drug trafficking, and organized crime be ensured under a police force shaped by Danielle Smith and Satpal Singh Parhar?

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

160,157 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

EXCLUSIVE: Court filings show Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s new chief of police, Satpal Singh Parhar, was once accused of nepotism. “Parhar groomed certain candidates for promotion based on his relationship with them rather than their own abilities or merit,” pleaded Staff Sergeant Bruce Walker in his lawsuit against the Calgary Police Service, naming Parhar—who was a deputy chief at the time—as one of the defendants. “Those officers were known within the CPS as ‘Friends of Sat’ or ‘FOS,’” Walker pleaded in his lawsuit. The lawsuit was discontinued in 2019 for unknown reasons days after Parhar’s announcement of retirement from the CPS. According to critics, this makes Parhar a tainted individual and raises concerns about what kind of policing culture will prevail under his leadership in Alberta. Watch the full report below 👇🏻

EXCLUSIVE: Court filings show Alberta Premier Danielle Smith’s new chief of police, Satpal Singh Parhar, was once accused of nepotism. “Parhar groomed certain candidates for promotion based on his relationship with them rather than their own abilities or merit,” pleaded Staff Sergeant Bruce Walker in his lawsuit against the Calgary Police Service, naming Parhar—who was a deputy chief at the time—as one of the defendants. “Those officers were known within the CPS as ‘Friends of Sat’ or ‘FOS,’” Walker pleaded in his lawsuit. The lawsuit was discontinued in 2019 for unknown reasons days after Parhar’s announcement of retirement from the CPS. According to critics, this makes Parhar a tainted individual and raises concerns about what kind of policing culture will prevail under his leadership in Alberta. Watch the full report below 👇🏻

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

17,574 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

“Danielle Smith is black inside. She appoints black inside. Similar people, they attract to each other.” Alberta resident Bob Rai, who suffered the consequences of a compromised police investigation into his cousin’s death is worried about the integrity of Alberta’s new police force under the leadership of Danielle Smith. “With the circumstances she’s surrounded with right now involving corruption and conflicts of interest — she desperately wants her own police force or access to police and intelligence, and I think she hired the perfect candidate that has almost a tainted past as much as she does.” In 2014, Rai’s cousin was murdered under suspicious circumstances. The investigation, he claims, was undermined by Punjabi Sikh translators and a fraudulent Nigerian pathologist who ruled the death a suicide by explosion and fire—effectively blocking the RCMP from pursuing a credible case of assassination linked to Punjabi Sikh organized crime. Now, Rai is expressing serious concern over Premier Danielle Smith’s appointment of Satpal Singh Parhar as Alberta’s new Chief of Police. Citing Parhar’s ties to both the Punjabi Sikh community and Nigeria, Rai fears a repeat of the systemic vulnerabilities that obstructed justice in his family’s case.

“Danielle Smith is black inside. She appoints black inside. Similar people, they attract to each other.” Alberta resident Bob Rai, who suffered the consequences of a compromised police investigation into his cousin’s death is worried about the integrity of Alberta’s new police force under the leadership of Danielle Smith. “With the circumstances she’s surrounded with right now involving corruption and conflicts of interest — she desperately wants her own police force or access to police and intelligence, and I think she hired the perfect candidate that has almost a tainted past as much as she does.” In 2014, Rai’s cousin was murdered under suspicious circumstances. The investigation, he claims, was undermined by Punjabi Sikh translators and a fraudulent Nigerian pathologist who ruled the death a suicide by explosion and fire—effectively blocking the RCMP from pursuing a credible case of assassination linked to Punjabi Sikh organized crime. Now, Rai is expressing serious concern over Premier Danielle Smith’s appointment of Satpal Singh Parhar as Alberta’s new Chief of Police. Citing Parhar’s ties to both the Punjabi Sikh community and Nigeria, Rai fears a repeat of the systemic vulnerabilities that obstructed justice in his family’s case.

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

34,327 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Ever wondered how people earn MONEY doing NOTHING? Well, Alberta’s new police chief, Satpal Singh Parhar, seems to have the answer. Here’s how our investigation uncovered chief Parhar’s secretive business ties to Huawei—the Chinese tech giant banned by the U.S. and Canada over national security and espionage concerns. Chief Parhar deleted his LinkedIn profile just hours after I sent a media inquiry asking why these foreign business ties weren’t listed. What did Premier Danielle Smith see in him that outweighs his lack of transparency?

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

40,419 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

National Security Risk? Meet Alberta’s New Police Chief with Foreign Ties: Satpal Singh Parhar On July 2, 2025, Premier Danielle Smith appointed Satpal Singh Parhar (a.k.a. Sat Parhar) as the inaugural chief of Alberta’s new provincial police force—despite what critics call a “tainted past.” We combed through court filings, corporate records, and government tenders, uncovering findings that raise serious national security concerns for both Canada and the United States, especially given Alberta’s shared border with Montana. Our investigation uncovered the following about Chief Satpal Singh Parhar: 📌He is president and shareholder (through a numbered company) of ReTrain Canada. 📌ReTrain Canada powers ReTrain Nigeria, which offers courses in cybersecurity and lists Huawei—the Chinese tech giant banned by Canada and the U.S. over espionage risks—as a client. 📌Until recently, he was president of a mental health clinic treating RCMP officers, despite holding financial ties to Huawei via another firm. 📌He was previously accused of nepotism in a lawsuit filed by fellow Calgary Police officer Bruce Walker. 📌He was once the subject of an investigation for allegedly failing to investigate internal misconduct involving evidence fabrication. 📌His company, ReTrain Canada, received several non-competitive, sole-sourced federal contracts—one worth nearly $100,000. 📌He is currently named in an active $3.5 million lawsuit filed by a former Calgary Police officer who was acquitted of breach of trust charges. 📌Appears to have no formal post-secondary education, aside from scattered certificates. 📌The Calgary Police Chief who promoted him to Deputy Chief—Roger Chaffin—was accused by his successor, Chief Mark Neufeld, of authorizing a $500,000 "sham" severance package for a legal counsel who gave herself a $50,000 raise. Just hours after we sent a media inquiry to Chief Parhar regarding undisclosed business ties omitted from his LinkedIn profile, his profile was deleted. "Danielle Smith wants this guy looking after the Canada-U.S. border where massive amounts of drug transport is taking place every single day," protests Bob Rai, a concerned Albertan who lived through the nightmare of having the police investigation into his cousin's tragic death compromised by a fake Nigerian forensic pathologist whose medical diploma has never been primary source verified. Concerned about the integrity of this new police force, Mr. Rai raises questions about what kind of police force will be created under Chief Parhar's leadership—especially given his business ties to immigration firms and Premier Danielle Smith's new policy to grant foreign police officers a pathway to PR for policing Albertans. "I think that this is absolutely ridiculous, I think she is trying to grow her own private police force -- and become her own little dictator," expressed Rai. Please be sure to follow and support investigative journalism that you won't find anywhere else Media Bezirgan

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

209,477 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

It is shocking that despite the Model Code of Conduct being in force, widespread violence was allowed to unfold in front of @CEOBengal’s office. Kolkata Police failed to contain TMC hooligans, who had gathered outside a public office to restrain and intimidate those seeking to appeal their deletion from the voter roll. Section 163 of the BNSS, equivalent to Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), is in force around the CEO’s office, yet Kolkata Police failed to implement it. And this isn’t the first time. To make matters worse, the OC of Amherst Street Police Station illegally detained a BJP worker who had come to submit an appeal at the CEO’s office. No action was taken against the TMC goons who created the ruckus. Ajay Kumar Nand (CP Kolkata) must immediately initiate an inquiry against the concerned OC and place the facts in the public domain. The OC appears to be guilty of violating Section 163 of the BNSS, falsely accusing a BJP worker of trespassing in a public office and of turning a victim into an accused. He should be suspended forthwith and subjected to major penalty proceedings.

It is shocking that despite the Model Code of Conduct being in force, widespread violence was allowed to unfold in front of @CEOBengal’s office. Kolkata Police failed to contain TMC hooligans, who had gathered outside a public office to restrain and intimidate those seeking to appeal their deletion from the voter roll. Section 163 of the BNSS, equivalent to Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), is in force around the CEO’s office, yet Kolkata Police failed to implement it. And this isn’t the first time. To make matters worse, the OC of Amherst Street Police Station illegally detained a BJP worker who had come to submit an appeal at the CEO’s office. No action was taken against the TMC goons who created the ruckus. Ajay Kumar Nand (CP Kolkata) must immediately initiate an inquiry against the concerned OC and place the facts in the public domain. The OC appears to be guilty of violating Section 163 of the BNSS, falsely accusing a BJP worker of trespassing in a public office and of turning a victim into an accused. He should be suspended forthwith and subjected to major penalty proceedings.

Amit Malviya

25,921 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Political parties at Queen's Park voted in lockstep to pass a new code of conduct law for municipal politicians. The housing minister admitted it was imperfect, and Premier Doug Ford acknowledged that he had some reservations about the law. #onpoli

Political parties at Queen's Park voted in lockstep to pass a new code of conduct law for municipal politicians. The housing minister admitted it was imperfect, and Premier Doug Ford acknowledged that he had some reservations about the law. #onpoli

Colin D'Mello | Global News

18,838 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$8 year old boy with autism is suspended from school in Georgia for having this little LEGO gun School administrators classified it as a “weapon” under the district’s Code of Conduct and he was given a 3-day suspension The boy’s mom and other parents say this is ridiculously strict to suspend a boy with disabilities over a tiny LEGO gun that poses no harm to anyway Official response from the school “The Henry County Board of Education’s Code of Conduct defines various levels of infractions, and school administrators consult these definitions in using their discretion to determine student consequences. In addition to consequences based on the level of violation, multiple violations during a school year could result in more severe consequences.” There are better things our schools could be focusing on than this$

8 year old boy with autism is suspended from school in Georgia for having this little LEGO gun School administrators classified it as a “weapon” under the district’s Code of Conduct and he was given a 3-day suspension The boy’s mom and other parents say this is ridiculously strict to suspend a boy with disabilities over a tiny LEGO gun that poses no harm to anyway Official response from the school “The Henry County Board of Education’s Code of Conduct defines various levels of infractions, and school administrators consult these definitions in using their discretion to determine student consequences. In addition to consequences based on the level of violation, multiple violations during a school year could result in more severe consequences.” There are better things our schools could be focusing on than this

Wall Street Apes

43,339 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

It seems to me that the GOP’s only attack left on Hunter Biden is that he wasn’t qualified to be on the Board for Burisma. This simply is not true if you know how boards of directors work. His role was to help Burisma with corporate governance and transparency, as well as advise them on international expansion. He was very qualified in these areas given his previous experience. - Hunter Biden holds a law degree from Yale Law School. - He was employed by the prominent NY-based law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as an attorney. During this time, he was involved quite significantly with aspects of corporate law, and governance. - He was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush to serve on the Board of Directors for Amtrak. Amtrak is the primary provider of intercity rail services in the US. Governance and transparency is crucial for Amtrak due to their public nature and federal funding. - He worked at MBNA, a major bank and credit card company as a consultant and lobbyist and also had them as a client. Obviously corporate governance and transparency is key for any bank. - He served on the board of directors for the World Food Program USA. - He cofounded a private equity firm. - He co-founded a lobbying firm. - He has worked as a consultant for other companies. If you don’t think he was qualified, then you don’t understand how boards of directors work. Let’s take a look at the Board of Directors for Fox Corporation. Both Paul Ryan and Anne Dias are on their board. Dias is a hedge fund CEO, with little to no experience in media, entertainment or broadcasting. Paul Ryan is a former politician. Boards of Directors are supposed to be made up of people of different backgrounds, not just experts on what that corporation does. Hunter Biden shouldn’t have taken the job because of the appearance of a conflict of interest, but to say he wasn’t qualified, is just wrong.

It seems to me that the GOP’s only attack left on Hunter Biden is that he wasn’t qualified to be on the Board for Burisma. This simply is not true if you know how boards of directors work. His role was to help Burisma with corporate governance and transparency, as well as advise them on international expansion. He was very qualified in these areas given his previous experience. - Hunter Biden holds a law degree from Yale Law School. - He was employed by the prominent NY-based law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP as an attorney. During this time, he was involved quite significantly with aspects of corporate law, and governance. - He was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush to serve on the Board of Directors for Amtrak. Amtrak is the primary provider of intercity rail services in the US. Governance and transparency is crucial for Amtrak due to their public nature and federal funding. - He worked at MBNA, a major bank and credit card company as a consultant and lobbyist and also had them as a client. Obviously corporate governance and transparency is key for any bank. - He served on the board of directors for the World Food Program USA. - He cofounded a private equity firm. - He co-founded a lobbying firm. - He has worked as a consultant for other companies. If you don’t think he was qualified, then you don’t understand how boards of directors work. Let’s take a look at the Board of Directors for Fox Corporation. Both Paul Ryan and Anne Dias are on their board. Dias is a hedge fund CEO, with little to no experience in media, entertainment or broadcasting. Paul Ryan is a former politician. Boards of Directors are supposed to be made up of people of different backgrounds, not just experts on what that corporation does. Hunter Biden shouldn’t have taken the job because of the appearance of a conflict of interest, but to say he wasn’t qualified, is just wrong.

Ed Krassenstein

478,920 просмотров • 2 лет назад

A woman was smoking in public place in Connaught Place, Delhi. A female police officer asked her to stop smoking. Instead of complying, she started arguing and asked cop to show the "No Smoking" board. Instead of fining and slapping the shit out of this woman, cop asked this woman to show the "Smoking" board. 🤦🤦 Smoking in public places is banned in Delhi under the Delhi Prohibition of Smoking and Non-Smokers Health Protection Act, 1996, and reinforced by the national COTPA 2003 law, which prohibits smoking in public places. It is another matter that people continue to smoke in public and nobody says anything.

A woman was smoking in public place in Connaught Place, Delhi. A female police officer asked her to stop smoking. Instead of complying, she started arguing and asked cop to show the "No Smoking" board. Instead of fining and slapping the shit out of this woman, cop asked this woman to show the "Smoking" board. 🤦🤦 Smoking in public places is banned in Delhi under the Delhi Prohibition of Smoking and Non-Smokers Health Protection Act, 1996, and reinforced by the national COTPA 2003 law, which prohibits smoking in public places. It is another matter that people continue to smoke in public and nobody says anything.

Incognito

235,368 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Police officer fired for feeding "feces sandwich" to homeless man—now promoted to Chief of Police. After being rehired on technicality—fired yet again after another poop-related attack in women's bathroom. He was rehired by another Texas police department—and promoted to Chief of Police. Matthew Luckhurst bragged to a fellow San Antonio police officer that he had picked up some feces, placed it in a slice of bread, put it in a Styrofoam container, and then gave it to a homeless man. His final termination from the San Antonio Police Department was in 2020. He was then rehired as a police officer by the Benavides Police Department in April 2023—promoted to Police Chief in June 2026. Benavides is a city located in Duval County in South Texas.

Police officer fired for feeding "feces sandwich" to homeless man—now promoted to Chief of Police. After being rehired on technicality—fired yet again after another poop-related attack in women's bathroom. He was rehired by another Texas police department—and promoted to Chief of Police. Matthew Luckhurst bragged to a fellow San Antonio police officer that he had picked up some feces, placed it in a slice of bread, put it in a Styrofoam container, and then gave it to a homeless man. His final termination from the San Antonio Police Department was in 2020. He was then rehired as a police officer by the Benavides Police Department in April 2023—promoted to Police Chief in June 2026. Benavides is a city located in Duval County in South Texas.

LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

105,883 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday walked back his comments that the United States attacked Iran because of Israel, saying the U.S. strikes "had to happen anyway." "The president made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks," Rubio told reporters on Tuesday. "This was a question of timing of why this had to happen as a joint operation," he added. "Not the question of the intent." On Monday, Rubio said the U.S. "proactively" hit Iran "in a defensive way" to prevent American casualties because the Trump administration believed an Israeli attack was imminent and that Iran "would immediately come after us" in retaliation. "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it, but this had to happen no matter what," he said Monday.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Tuesday walked back his comments that the United States attacked Iran because of Israel, saying the U.S. strikes "had to happen anyway." "The president made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks," Rubio told reporters on Tuesday. "This was a question of timing of why this had to happen as a joint operation," he added. "Not the question of the intent." On Monday, Rubio said the U.S. "proactively" hit Iran "in a defensive way" to prevent American casualties because the Trump administration believed an Israeli attack was imminent and that Iran "would immediately come after us" in retaliation. "Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it, but this had to happen no matter what," he said Monday.

PBS News

13,865 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

VIDEO | Here’s what advocate Prashant Bhushan (Prashant Bhushan) said on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest by ED. “It’s astounding that ED has arrested the Chief Minister of a state just before the elections after the model code of conduct that has kicked into place and in a case where they don’t have any documentary evidence to show that he was involved in the corruption; where they are relying on a statement of some approver who was the officer of a company. The company that had given electoral bonds to the BJP party which controls the ED.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

VIDEO | Here’s what advocate Prashant Bhushan (Prashant Bhushan) said on Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s arrest by ED. “It’s astounding that ED has arrested the Chief Minister of a state just before the elections after the model code of conduct that has kicked into place and in a case where they don’t have any documentary evidence to show that he was involved in the corruption; where they are relying on a statement of some approver who was the officer of a company. The company that had given electoral bonds to the BJP party which controls the ED.” (Full video available on PTI Videos -

Press Trust of India

370,754 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 JUST IN: The greatest Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has RESET foreign policy in favor of America First He said all of this perfectly. Marco is GREAT. "One of the assumptions was the loss of the notion of the NATIONAL INTEREST in our foreign policy. At the core, foreign policy needs to be the national interest of the United States." "Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't issues and things we care about in the world. But at its core, the core principle of the national interest, the core principle behind our foreign policy needs to be our national interest." "So you have to, first of all, define what is the national interest, and then you have to apply it. We defined it as we are in favor of foreign policies that make America safer, or stronger, or more prosperous. Hopefully all three, but at least one of those three." "And then it requires you to prioritize. Even the richest, most powerful, and influential country on Earth has limited resources, has limited time. And it has to be able to dedicate those resources and time through a process of prioritization." "We're very proud of that going into effect and continuing to work forward."

🚨 JUST IN: The greatest Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has RESET foreign policy in favor of America First He said all of this perfectly. Marco is GREAT. "One of the assumptions was the loss of the notion of the NATIONAL INTEREST in our foreign policy. At the core, foreign policy needs to be the national interest of the United States." "Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't issues and things we care about in the world. But at its core, the core principle of the national interest, the core principle behind our foreign policy needs to be our national interest." "So you have to, first of all, define what is the national interest, and then you have to apply it. We defined it as we are in favor of foreign policies that make America safer, or stronger, or more prosperous. Hopefully all three, but at least one of those three." "And then it requires you to prioritize. Even the richest, most powerful, and influential country on Earth has limited resources, has limited time. And it has to be able to dedicate those resources and time through a process of prioritization." "We're very proud of that going into effect and continuing to work forward."

Eric Daugherty

29,987 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨🏆New FSU Member Victory Testimonial: Councillor Dulcie Tudor Councillor Dulcie Tudor did not breach Cornwall Council’s code of conduct over gender-critical comments made on social media. Despite gender-critical beliefs being protected under the Equality Act 2010, Cornwall Council hired an external lawyer — at taxpayers’ expense — to investigate 9 complaints alleging a breach of the council’s code of conduct. After seeking external advice — again at taxpayers’ expense — the council’s Head of Governance, Elections and Investigations ruled there was no breach. The external advisor found: “in so far as some members of the public might find the post discriminatory, disrespectful or offensive, the statements it contains represent a legitimate expression of a political opinion based on honestly held views that are grounded in fact and law”. The investigation concluded that Cllr Tudor’s comments were protected by Article 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and that the posts “do not constitute direct or indirect discrimination against trans individuals”. How much taxpayer money was wasted on an external expert to tell the council what is already law, as we told them in our letter — and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court’s ruling last April? We are delighted for Dulcie and proud to have supported her. But her case is not isolated. Across the country, we are seeing an increase in the weaponisation of the code of conduct complaints process against elected representatives — Dulcie’s was one of the most egregious we have seen to date. Other councils should think again before taking up these spurious complaints.

🚨🏆New FSU Member Victory Testimonial: Councillor Dulcie Tudor Councillor Dulcie Tudor did not breach Cornwall Council’s code of conduct over gender-critical comments made on social media. Despite gender-critical beliefs being protected under the Equality Act 2010, Cornwall Council hired an external lawyer — at taxpayers’ expense — to investigate 9 complaints alleging a breach of the council’s code of conduct. After seeking external advice — again at taxpayers’ expense — the council’s Head of Governance, Elections and Investigations ruled there was no breach. The external advisor found: “in so far as some members of the public might find the post discriminatory, disrespectful or offensive, the statements it contains represent a legitimate expression of a political opinion based on honestly held views that are grounded in fact and law”. The investigation concluded that Cllr Tudor’s comments were protected by Article 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and that the posts “do not constitute direct or indirect discrimination against trans individuals”. How much taxpayer money was wasted on an external expert to tell the council what is already law, as we told them in our letter — and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court’s ruling last April? We are delighted for Dulcie and proud to have supported her. But her case is not isolated. Across the country, we are seeing an increase in the weaponisation of the code of conduct complaints process against elected representatives — Dulcie’s was one of the most egregious we have seen to date. Other councils should think again before taking up these spurious complaints.

The Free Speech Union

11,762 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Here is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” Time to investigate Nancy Pelosi: The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

Here is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” Time to investigate Nancy Pelosi: The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

346,655 просмотров • 1 год назад

Mufti Saif al-'Asri on the fatwa by some Hanafis that allows interest (riba) based transactions in non-Muslim lands. People are using this opinion to claim that Muslims taking out interest-based mortgages is permissible. Question: Is it permissible to conduct interest (riba) based transactions in Western countries? Mufti Saif al-'Asri: This question is very important, especially if the intention of this Muslim, who lives in a Muslim country, is to introduce them to Islam and its way of life, and to be an exemplary person that people imitate. So, if when he comes to a non-Muslim country, he says: "There's an opinion that the Hanafis have which considers it permissible to conduct otherwise impermissible transactions in non-Muslim lands. So, it's permissible for me to sell pigs to them and it's permissible for me to engage in interest (riba) based transactions with them. Some Hanafis make the condition that he is the one receiving the interest and not giving it, meaning he's the one receiving the benefits (of the interest based transaction) and he's not benefiting the one he's conducting a transaction with, and so forth. This is an opinion, an opinion that exists. We can't wipe away this jurisprudential opinion. And it has its evidence. However, the vast majority of scholars, and it's even an opinion within the Hanafi school itself, are of the view that it is haram for a Muslim to conduct an impermissible transaction with a non-Muslim. It is not permissible for him (a Muslim) to conduct an interest based transaction with him (Non-Muslim), nor is it permissible to sell or buy alcohol from him, nor is it permissible to sell him pork, and so on and so forth. None of that is permissible. And this opinion is the opinion of the vast majority of scholars. It's the opinion that allows you as a Muslim to be proud of your religion in front of others. It allows you to proudly showcase the distinguishing features of Islam and take honor in the religion that you ascribe to. On the other hand, if you're going to take legal dispensations and conduct transactions based on these things, how are you going to be a caller to this religion? Through your character? The way you speak? Your actions? How? How are people going to look at you? If they say: "Islam prohibits pork; however, masha'Allah, this Muslim at the store sells pork." I mean, what will make you different from other people? A Muslim must not conduct impermissible transactions, whether it's interest or other than it in Western countries.

Mufti Saif al-'Asri on the fatwa by some Hanafis that allows interest (riba) based transactions in non-Muslim lands. People are using this opinion to claim that Muslims taking out interest-based mortgages is permissible. Question: Is it permissible to conduct interest (riba) based transactions in Western countries? Mufti Saif al-'Asri: This question is very important, especially if the intention of this Muslim, who lives in a Muslim country, is to introduce them to Islam and its way of life, and to be an exemplary person that people imitate. So, if when he comes to a non-Muslim country, he says: "There's an opinion that the Hanafis have which considers it permissible to conduct otherwise impermissible transactions in non-Muslim lands. So, it's permissible for me to sell pigs to them and it's permissible for me to engage in interest (riba) based transactions with them. Some Hanafis make the condition that he is the one receiving the interest and not giving it, meaning he's the one receiving the benefits (of the interest based transaction) and he's not benefiting the one he's conducting a transaction with, and so forth. This is an opinion, an opinion that exists. We can't wipe away this jurisprudential opinion. And it has its evidence. However, the vast majority of scholars, and it's even an opinion within the Hanafi school itself, are of the view that it is haram for a Muslim to conduct an impermissible transaction with a non-Muslim. It is not permissible for him (a Muslim) to conduct an interest based transaction with him (Non-Muslim), nor is it permissible to sell or buy alcohol from him, nor is it permissible to sell him pork, and so on and so forth. None of that is permissible. And this opinion is the opinion of the vast majority of scholars. It's the opinion that allows you as a Muslim to be proud of your religion in front of others. It allows you to proudly showcase the distinguishing features of Islam and take honor in the religion that you ascribe to. On the other hand, if you're going to take legal dispensations and conduct transactions based on these things, how are you going to be a caller to this religion? Through your character? The way you speak? Your actions? How? How are people going to look at you? If they say: "Islam prohibits pork; however, masha'Allah, this Muslim at the store sells pork." I mean, what will make you different from other people? A Muslim must not conduct impermissible transactions, whether it's interest or other than it in Western countries.

Akbar Zab

88,566 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s treacherous lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” 📝It’s time to investigate the bitch once and for all. The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

This is: The Chief of the Capitol Police Steven Sund, who oversaw January 6. Not only did he call the treacherous witch, Nancy Pelosi once; he called her twice — and then a third time. Watch as the entire room erupts when Capitol Police Chief Chief Steven Sund exposes Nancy Pelosi’s treacherous lies during shocking January 6 testimony: “I spoke with Speaker Pelosi three times, and she went on TV and said I had never spoken to her.” 📝It’s time to investigate the bitch once and for all. The January 6 riot was orchestrated as a distraction to prevent the presentation of evidence of election fraud — an act that amounted to the overthrow of the U.S. government.

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

391,534 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад