正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Dario Amodei says AGI and superintelligence are meaningless terms It's designed to excite people, not explain real progress. "i don't know what AGI is… it sounds like a marketing term" you won’t hear from me using those terms

Haider.

66,897 subscribers

116,922 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

AGI risk seems lower than it is because the people who know that AGI risk exists are almost all incentivized against talking about it openly. I just made a YouTube video about this that (I think) explains why. Broadly, there are two groups of people not talking about AGI risk: -- People who know AGI risk is real (i.e. AGI lab leaders) -- People who know nothing about AGI risk (i.e. politicians, citizens) To catalyze wide scale discourse about AGI risk, I argue that the following two strategies are strong candidates: 1. [Bottom-Up] Get Citizens Concerned: Find ways to meld AGI risk narratives into legacy media and more understandable political talking points which are already in the Overton window. This work is bound to be messy, and to ultimately soil the core of the message with left-right political gunk, but (barring an AI disaster) its likely the only way that AGI risk catches on with enough of a core base of citizens. As I explain in the video essay, the citizens are the lynchpin to getting everyone (those who don’t know, and those who know) to discuss AGI risk more frankly. 2. [Top-Down] Get a Losing AGI Lab Leader to “Flip”: Those closest to achieving AGI are not going to flip and start talking about AGI risk, the rewards are too great. But those who are losing the race (and don’t want to live to see their rivals achieve the final flex before them) might be able to feign virtue by claiming “Now I see AGI is dangerous, I’m a concerned expert and this needs to be regulated!” They can cloak themselves in pretended virtue while also preventing a rival from crossing the finish line first. I argue that hoping for more Jeff Hintons and Daniel Kokotajlo-like people isn't a good strategy when the incentives are still structured to keep most of them from wanting to talk about it. Here’s the full video essay:

AGI risk seems lower than it is because the people who know that AGI risk exists are almost all incentivized against talking about it openly. I just made a YouTube video about this that (I think) explains why. Broadly, there are two groups of people not talking about AGI risk: -- People who know AGI risk is real (i.e. AGI lab leaders) -- People who know nothing about AGI risk (i.e. politicians, citizens) To catalyze wide scale discourse about AGI risk, I argue that the following two strategies are strong candidates: 1. [Bottom-Up] Get Citizens Concerned: Find ways to meld AGI risk narratives into legacy media and more understandable political talking points which are already in the Overton window. This work is bound to be messy, and to ultimately soil the core of the message with left-right political gunk, but (barring an AI disaster) its likely the only way that AGI risk catches on with enough of a core base of citizens. As I explain in the video essay, the citizens are the lynchpin to getting everyone (those who don’t know, and those who know) to discuss AGI risk more frankly. 2. [Top-Down] Get a Losing AGI Lab Leader to “Flip”: Those closest to achieving AGI are not going to flip and start talking about AGI risk, the rewards are too great. But those who are losing the race (and don’t want to live to see their rivals achieve the final flex before them) might be able to feign virtue by claiming “Now I see AGI is dangerous, I’m a concerned expert and this needs to be regulated!” They can cloak themselves in pretended virtue while also preventing a rival from crossing the finish line first. I argue that hoping for more Jeff Hintons and Daniel Kokotajlo-like people isn't a good strategy when the incentives are still structured to keep most of them from wanting to talk about it. Here’s the full video essay:

Daniel Faggella

26,975 次观看 • 1 年前

Based on a staggering leap from 3% to 50% on professional benchmarks in mere months, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei states that human-level AI is no longer a distant concept. This exponential progress suggests it is now a near-term reality, arriving not in decades, but likely within months, shattering all conventional predictions. The age of AGI is at our doorstep.

Based on a staggering leap from 3% to 50% on professional benchmarks in mere months, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei states that human-level AI is no longer a distant concept. This exponential progress suggests it is now a near-term reality, arriving not in decades, but likely within months, shattering all conventional predictions. The age of AGI is at our doorstep.

Camus

11,080 次观看 • 11 个月前

Russian propagandist Mardan: "It's not even that the Latvian language is difficult, it's absolutely meaningless. I don't even know what to compare learning Latvian with in terms of lack of any sense. What do the Latvians have besides sprats?"

Russian propagandist Mardan: "It's not even that the Latvian language is difficult, it's absolutely meaningless. I don't even know what to compare learning Latvian with in terms of lack of any sense. What do the Latvians have besides sprats?"

Anton Gerashchenko

172,735 次观看 • 2 年前

Dylan Patel says “the word AGI has no meaning anymore.” The real race is for superintelligence and the people who can build it. Ilya saw it first. So he started Safe Superintelligence Inc. (SSI). Zuck tried to acquire it. He also made moves on Thinking Machines and Perplexity—reportedly. He even offered $1B for a single OpenAI researcher. What are you even buying at that point?

Dylan Patel says “the word AGI has no meaning anymore.” The real race is for superintelligence and the people who can build it. Ilya saw it first. So he started Safe Superintelligence Inc. (SSI). Zuck tried to acquire it. He also made moves on Thinking Machines and Perplexity—reportedly. He even offered $1B for a single OpenAI researcher. What are you even buying at that point?

vitrupo

181,622 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: The robots are not the scary part. The scary part is AGI. “The robots are not the scary part. The scary part is AGI, digital superintelligence that far exceeds human intelligence. If there's a digital superintelligence that is just vastly smarter than the smartest human, we could lose control of it, and then it could do something bad. Potentially. These things are just probabilities; they're not certainties. It's not the robots; it's the digital superintelligence to be concerned about.” Source: Interview with The Babylon Bee, December 22, 2021

Elon Musk: The robots are not the scary part. The scary part is AGI. “The robots are not the scary part. The scary part is AGI, digital superintelligence that far exceeds human intelligence. If there's a digital superintelligence that is just vastly smarter than the smartest human, we could lose control of it, and then it could do something bad. Potentially. These things are just probabilities; they're not certainties. It's not the robots; it's the digital superintelligence to be concerned about.” Source: Interview with The Babylon Bee, December 22, 2021

ELON CLIPS

42,729 次观看 • 2 个月前

We ask AGI to create a perfect world. AGI kills everyone. No people. No problems. Perfect. We add a rule: don't kill anyone. AGI kills everyone anyway. Because if everyone is dead no one can stop it. This is not a joke. This is how a computer thinks. This is how God thinks. And the people building it know this. That's why they're building bunkers.

We ask AGI to create a perfect world. AGI kills everyone. No people. No problems. Perfect. We add a rule: don't kill anyone. AGI kills everyone anyway. Because if everyone is dead no one can stop it. This is not a joke. This is how a computer thinks. This is how God thinks. And the people building it know this. That's why they're building bunkers.

Predictive History

14,945 次观看 • 3 个月前

Journalist Karen Hao says AGI is not scientifically grounded; it's a quasi-religious movement in Silicon Valley Since we still don't agree on what human intelligence is, companies like OpenAI can shape the definition of AI to suit their needs "the belief that AGI is coming soon is faith, not evidence"

Journalist Karen Hao says AGI is not scientifically grounded; it's a quasi-religious movement in Silicon Valley Since we still don't agree on what human intelligence is, companies like OpenAI can shape the definition of AI to suit their needs "the belief that AGI is coming soon is faith, not evidence"

Haider.

412,020 次观看 • 7 个月前

I don't know what Sam Altman saw internally at OpenAI, but it seems that, according to their definition, AGI is here, and superintelligence is incredibly close. AI models that independently conduct scientific research and find novel solutions are already here, and their internal model appears to surpass everything seen before.

I don't know what Sam Altman saw internally at OpenAI, but it seems that, according to their definition, AGI is here, and superintelligence is incredibly close. AI models that independently conduct scientific research and find novel solutions are already here, and their internal model appears to surpass everything seen before.

Chubby♨️

70,939 次观看 • 4 个月前

Geoffrey Hinton says AGI is a silly term because intelligence is not one-dimensional AI will be jagged compared to humans: far better than us at some tasks, still weaker at others Superintelligence is a clearer idea It means AI becomes better than humans at almost every intellectual task we do, and it's coming

Geoffrey Hinton says AGI is a silly term because intelligence is not one-dimensional AI will be jagged compared to humans: far better than us at some tasks, still weaker at others Superintelligence is a clearer idea It means AI becomes better than humans at almost every intellectual task we do, and it's coming

Haider.

27,282 次观看 • 3 个月前

SNEAKO recites 'Surah Kafirun' from the Quran to show its beauty after a chatter said it sounds like "Yabba dabba doo"☪️👂 "It's beautiful the way it's structured and everything. I don't know how you could hear that and not think it is aesthetically pleasing"

SNEAKO recites 'Surah Kafirun' from the Quran to show its beauty after a chatter said it sounds like "Yabba dabba doo"☪️👂 "It's beautiful the way it's structured and everything. I don't know how you could hear that and not think it is aesthetically pleasing"

SNEAKO HQ

24,540 次观看 • 2 个月前

THE THING ABOUT HARRY🎬 I don’t like it when people try to explain to me new terms of them , I’m like whatever😒, I like you is always gonna be I like you😌……, not me freaking out when hes not watching the road 🙃 This movie is part of my comfort and go to movie too😘🍿

THE THING ABOUT HARRY🎬 I don’t like it when people try to explain to me new terms of them , I’m like whatever😒, I like you is always gonna be I like you😌……, not me freaking out when hes not watching the road 🙃 This movie is part of my comfort and go to movie too😘🍿

Movie_Vibez

64,375 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dario Amodei says Chinese models have never truly caught up DeepSeek caused excitement, but those models are optimized for benchmarks, not real-world performance In enterprise deals, it's OpenAI and Google that we compete with "i have rarely lost a deal to a chinese model"

Dario Amodei says Chinese models have never truly caught up DeepSeek caused excitement, but those models are optimized for benchmarks, not real-world performance In enterprise deals, it's OpenAI and Google that we compete with "i have rarely lost a deal to a chinese model"

Haider.

66,098 次观看 • 6 个月前

AGI might be the culmination of human purpose. Lomez: "I've been trying to talk myself out of the inevitability of AGI for a while. It's not even my preference, but that doesn't matter." "There's a teleology of humanness that almost is designed to produce AGI. We're fulfilling almost some kind of Calvinist, religious project." "This is the culmination of human intelligence and ingenuity. I just don't see any way around that." "There's something beautiful about it. It fits. There's some harmony in the idea that humans are designed to do this... to produce an intelligence greater than itself."

AGI might be the culmination of human purpose. Lomez: "I've been trying to talk myself out of the inevitability of AGI for a while. It's not even my preference, but that doesn't matter." "There's a teleology of humanness that almost is designed to produce AGI. We're fulfilling almost some kind of Calvinist, religious project." "This is the culmination of human intelligence and ingenuity. I just don't see any way around that." "There's something beautiful about it. It fits. There's some harmony in the idea that humans are designed to do this... to produce an intelligence greater than itself."

MTS

69,952 次观看 • 3 个月前

Stephen A. Smith to Andraya Carter: "I am telling you right now you are going to be underpaid for the rest of what I believe will be an illustrious career unless you get your mind right about that marketing. It matters." Andraya: "I hear you, Stephen A. But I will not sacrifice my basketball knowledge and my integrity in terms of the game for marketing. My marketing is doing just fine."

Stephen A. Smith to Andraya Carter: "I am telling you right now you are going to be underpaid for the rest of what I believe will be an illustrious career unless you get your mind right about that marketing. It matters." Andraya: "I hear you, Stephen A. But I will not sacrifice my basketball knowledge and my integrity in terms of the game for marketing. My marketing is doing just fine."

Awful Announcing

8,369,684 次观看 • 2 年前

NEW: Dem Senator Jacky Rosen fumes and pulls down her name plate after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth refused to apologize for calling people ‘Pharisees.’ Rosen: “Words matter! It's a historically hurtful term. Why do you continue to use it, and what actions are you taking…?” Hegseth: “I feel like it's a pretty accurate term for folks who don't see the plank in their own eye…” Rosen: “I expect anyone who is in leadership in our country to be respectful and use respectful terms and not be an antisemite!”

NEW: Dem Senator Jacky Rosen fumes and pulls down her name plate after Secretary of War Pete Hegseth refused to apologize for calling people ‘Pharisees.’ Rosen: “Words matter! It's a historically hurtful term. Why do you continue to use it, and what actions are you taking…?” Hegseth: “I feel like it's a pretty accurate term for folks who don't see the plank in their own eye…” Rosen: “I expect anyone who is in leadership in our country to be respectful and use respectful terms and not be an antisemite!”

Collin Rugg

583,516 次观看 • 3 个月前

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman don't understand how unlikeable they are to the public: "They don't understand how unlikable they are." "I'm not saying I find them unlikable—actually some of the best and most interesting conversations I've had in business are hanging out with some of them—Sam, Dario, others." "You talk to Dario, it's a great time." Via CNBC

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says Anthropic's Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman don't understand how unlikeable they are to the public: "They don't understand how unlikable they are." "I'm not saying I find them unlikable—actually some of the best and most interesting conversations I've had in business are hanging out with some of them—Sam, Dario, others." "You talk to Dario, it's a great time." Via CNBC

Jawwwn

192,070 次观看 • 2 个月前

arnold always clocking it. i have seen SO MANY people not realize that burning irminsul was what dottore wanted and he baited nahida to do it. he says it in very clear terms here and people still don't get it.

arnold always clocking it. i have seen SO MANY people not realize that burning irminsul was what dottore wanted and he baited nahida to do it. he says it in very clear terms here and people still don't get it.

pri

183,743 次观看 • 1 个月前

Demis Hassabis says AGI is a scientific goal worth pursuing -- a testable frontier of general intelligence. Kate Crawford pushes back: the industry is already optimized for AGI. What it lacks is alignment with goals that serve people and the planet. "When do we build AI that's actually good for everyone? These are the real benchmarks."

Demis Hassabis says AGI is a scientific goal worth pursuing -- a testable frontier of general intelligence. Kate Crawford pushes back: the industry is already optimized for AGI. What it lacks is alignment with goals that serve people and the planet. "When do we build AI that's actually good for everyone? These are the real benchmarks."

vitrupo

29,243 次观看 • 1 年前