Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Dario Amodei warns that software may soon become so cheap it feels almost free. The old model, building software for mass distribution to justify cost may no longer apply. Apps could be generated on-demand, even for simple, one-off use cases. But this flexibility comes at a cost: entire careers... show more

Wes Roth

35,639 subscribers

81,457 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Dario Amodei says software engineering might get disrupted faster than entry-level white-collar jobs We are currently in a "centaur phase" — managing AI systems rather than writing code, which may briefly increase demand for engineers "but the centaur phase for software may be very brief"

Dario Amodei says software engineering might get disrupted faster than entry-level white-collar jobs We are currently in a "centaur phase" — managing AI systems rather than writing code, which may briefly increase demand for engineers "but the centaur phase for software may be very brief"

Haider.

29,991 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

797,482 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WILL BE COMPLETELY OBSOLETE IN 6-12 MONTHS" DARIO AMODEI CEO, Anthropic

"SOFTWARE ENGINEERING WILL BE COMPLETELY OBSOLETE IN 6-12 MONTHS" DARIO AMODEI CEO, Anthropic

JNS

13,643 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Future of Software Engineering Pete Koomen AI will bring the cost of building software down to zero, but this means we’ll need MORE human developers, not fewer. We’d like to fund startups building tools for this future.

The Future of Software Engineering Pete Koomen AI will bring the cost of building software down to zero, but this means we’ll need MORE human developers, not fewer. We’d like to fund startups building tools for this future.

Y Combinator

208,978 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“Growth no longer guarantees jobs.” Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI could create a world with 5–10% GDP growth and still leave millions of people out of work. That breaks the old link between productivity and employment. Software gets cheaper. Companies move faster. Entire careers stop being safe by default.

“Growth no longer guarantees jobs.” Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI could create a world with 5–10% GDP growth and still leave millions of people out of work. That breaks the old link between productivity and employment. Software gets cheaper. Companies move faster. Entire careers stop being safe by default.

Jon Hernandez

87,151 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: We don’t know if the models are conscious. We are not even sure what it would mean for a model to be conscious. But we’re open to the idea that it could be.

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: We don’t know if the models are conscious. We are not even sure what it would mean for a model to be conscious. But we’re open to the idea that it could be.

Clash Report

32,344 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"Software Engineering Will Be Automatable in 12 Months," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicts that AI models will be able to do 'most, maybe all' of what software engineers do end-to-end within 6 to 12 months, shifting engineers to editors.

"Software Engineering Will Be Automatable in 12 Months," Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei predicts that AI models will be able to do 'most, maybe all' of what software engineers do end-to-end within 6 to 12 months, shifting engineers to editors.

Wes Roth

4,473,069 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Will Software Engineering Jobs Still Exist in 10 Years? "Software engineering jobs of today will not exist in 5-10 years. There will be demand for smart people who know how to wrangle these AI coding machines. If we want to call those people software engineers, so be it. But I think the job will be dramatically, dramatically different." Tom Blomfield with David Lieb on Y Combinator's YT Channel

Will Software Engineering Jobs Still Exist in 10 Years? "Software engineering jobs of today will not exist in 5-10 years. There will be demand for smart people who know how to wrangle these AI coding machines. If we want to call those people software engineers, so be it. But I think the job will be dramatically, dramatically different." Tom Blomfield with David Lieb on Y Combinator's YT Channel

Overlap: Business & Tech

14,890 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

📁 Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI will disrupt jobs faster and broader than anything before. Some roles, even software engineers, may shrink as models automate entire workflows. The real question is not which jobs disappear. It is whether we create new ones in time.

📁 Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, says AI will disrupt jobs faster and broader than anything before. Some roles, even software engineers, may shrink as models automate entire workflows. The real question is not which jobs disappear. It is whether we create new ones in time.

Jon Hernandez

33,385 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

We’re in the “centaur” moment for software: humans + AI outperform either alone, but it won’t last. Then machines will dominate, and entry-level engineering gets wrecked fast. Don’t assume “we’ll adapt like before.” The pace is different: a brief phase where humans check AI code, then a rapid shift that guts junior white-collar paths. - Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei "So after Garry Kasparov was beaten by Deep Blue, chess went through a 15–20 year stretch where a “centaur” team, a human checking an AI’s moves, could beat any human or any AI alone. That era eventually ended, and it became mostly just the machine. My worry is that we’re already in that centaur phase for software. During this phase, demand for software engineers might even increase, but the phase could be very short. Then entry-level white-collar work, especially software engineering, gets hit with a major disruption. People compare this to older labor shifts, like farming to industry to knowledge work, and say humans adapt. But those transitions played out over decades or centuries. This one is happening in just a few years, and that speed is the real concern." ---- Video from "Interesting Times with Ross Douthat + New York Times Opinion + New York Times Podcasts" YT channel (link in comment)

We’re in the “centaur” moment for software: humans + AI outperform either alone, but it won’t last. Then machines will dominate, and entry-level engineering gets wrecked fast. Don’t assume “we’ll adapt like before.” The pace is different: a brief phase where humans check AI code, then a rapid shift that guts junior white-collar paths. - Anthropic's CEO Dario Amodei "So after Garry Kasparov was beaten by Deep Blue, chess went through a 15–20 year stretch where a “centaur” team, a human checking an AI’s moves, could beat any human or any AI alone. That era eventually ended, and it became mostly just the machine. My worry is that we’re already in that centaur phase for software. During this phase, demand for software engineers might even increase, but the phase could be very short. Then entry-level white-collar work, especially software engineering, gets hit with a major disruption. People compare this to older labor shifts, like farming to industry to knowledge work, and say humans adapt. But those transitions played out over decades or centuries. This one is happening in just a few years, and that speed is the real concern." ---- Video from "Interesting Times with Ross Douthat + New York Times Opinion + New York Times Podcasts" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

17,239 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

CPU may be slow but the Software running perfectly

CPU may be slow but the Software running perfectly

MERICA MEMED

240,939 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

In the AI era, the next great software distribution company won’t look like an app store For the last decade-plus, building a strong software business was mostly a game of scarcity. The hard part was assembling the capital, taste, engineering, and distribution to build one enduring app. The discovery systems we built matched that world: app stores, SEO, search bars, rankings, reviews, ads, marketplaces AI has blown up these constraints Soon, anyone will be able to generate software for anything: a workout injury, a work project, a personal workflow, a one-off analysis, a weird niche need only they have, maybe only in a single moment Some apps will last forever, but most won’t. Many will exist for minutes or hours, and be created even faster But just because software can be created at the speed of thought doesn’t mean everyone will become a developer. Most people won’t want to prompt, build, debug, deploy, or manage software. They’ll just want to be matched with the right tool for the job in front of them The same technological wave enabling software creation at scale is also breaking software distribution at scale. Search assumes the best answer already exists somewhere. App stores assume software is something you browse, compare, install, and keep In a world of personal software, the real question becomes: Who understands enough about me, or has earned enough trust from me, to know what software should exist for me right now? The next great app distribution companies may look less like search engines and more like trusted relationships Some will win by importing and processing personal context: your goals, constraints, calendar, body, files, workflows, history, collaborators, and intent. Others will win by exporting taste and trust: experts, creators, communities, agents, and brands that people rely on to decide what is worth using Either way, the new gateway won’t be a search box or an app store shelf. It will be the layer that recommends, assembles, routes, and personalizes software at the moment of need This is the new frontier: context, recommendation, trust, and distribution in the age of infinite software If you’re building platforms or experiences for this future, we want to meet you. Apply to a16z speedrun 🧊. Applications for SR007 close this weekend Application link below

In the AI era, the next great software distribution company won’t look like an app store For the last decade-plus, building a strong software business was mostly a game of scarcity. The hard part was assembling the capital, taste, engineering, and distribution to build one enduring app. The discovery systems we built matched that world: app stores, SEO, search bars, rankings, reviews, ads, marketplaces AI has blown up these constraints Soon, anyone will be able to generate software for anything: a workout injury, a work project, a personal workflow, a one-off analysis, a weird niche need only they have, maybe only in a single moment Some apps will last forever, but most won’t. Many will exist for minutes or hours, and be created even faster But just because software can be created at the speed of thought doesn’t mean everyone will become a developer. Most people won’t want to prompt, build, debug, deploy, or manage software. They’ll just want to be matched with the right tool for the job in front of them The same technological wave enabling software creation at scale is also breaking software distribution at scale. Search assumes the best answer already exists somewhere. App stores assume software is something you browse, compare, install, and keep In a world of personal software, the real question becomes: Who understands enough about me, or has earned enough trust from me, to know what software should exist for me right now? The next great app distribution companies may look less like search engines and more like trusted relationships Some will win by importing and processing personal context: your goals, constraints, calendar, body, files, workflows, history, collaborators, and intent. Others will win by exporting taste and trust: experts, creators, communities, agents, and brands that people rely on to decide what is worth using Either way, the new gateway won’t be a search box or an app store shelf. It will be the layer that recommends, assembles, routes, and personalizes software at the moment of need This is the new frontier: context, recommendation, trust, and distribution in the age of infinite software If you’re building platforms or experiences for this future, we want to meet you. Apply to a16z speedrun 🧊. Applications for SR007 close this weekend Application link below

Josh Lu

10,586 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Our 3D customizable vtuber avatar doesn't need an external tool or software to be used, everything is built into Warudo, like a Live2D customizable vtuber model! :D Warudo is a free vtubing software, like VTube Studio, but for 3D! We will include a guide on how to use our model when we launch it. Here's a WIP of the first outfit so far! 🩷

Pastell & Palette🤍 3D Customizable Model!

94,578 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

Evan Spiegel on the lesson that killed his first startup and led to Snapchat: "We focused on building the perfect product for way too long before we got feedback. We worked for like eighteen months to build this perfect full-featured product, which was in direct contravention to how I was always taught to build things. Build a prototype, build an MVP, get it in front of people, learn as quickly as possible. But we had spent all this time building this perfect piece of software and we hadn't thought enough about distribution. While we built this great piece of software, our competitor at the time, Naviance, had secured distribution through all the different college counselors. What piece of software are you going to choose to help your kid get into college? The one recommended by the college counselors or the one from two kids at Stanford? I think it's a pretty easy choice. So we saw very early that we had no distribution advantage. Even if we loved our software, people weren't going to use it because we didn't have a scalable way to get it in people's hands. Around that time when we saw the emergence of the App Store on iPhone, it was very clear that was a distribution channel we could really use and benefit from. But we also needed to build things we could build quickly, things we really were going to use together with our friends so we could be the first early customers. Ultimately Peekaboo and Snapchat represented that." This is exactly the asymmetry Peter Thiel describes in Zero to One: superior distribution by itself can create a monopoly, even with no product differentiation. The converse is not true. Thiel puts an even finer point on it: most businesses get zero distribution channels to work. Poor sales rather than bad product is the most common cause of failure. If you can get just one distribution channel to work, you have a great business. Estée Lauder said: it's not enough to have the most wonderful product in the world. You must be able to sell it. Many founders over-index on product perfection and under-invest in distribution. The world is full of great products nobody knows about, and mediocre products with massive distribution that dominate markets. Evan Spiegel lived it. He built the better product, watched it lose, and then built something he could actually distribute.

David Senra

27,043 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"The concept that a software developer of a neutral tool is somehow responsible for what the users of his software may or may not do is TERRIFYING” Keonne Rodriguez on today’s #BullishBit

"The concept that a software developer of a neutral tool is somehow responsible for what the users of his software may or may not do is TERRIFYING” Keonne Rodriguez on today’s #BullishBit

BTC Sessions 😎

10,611 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

OpenAI Head of DevEx, Romain Huet: The cost of building software is trending toward zero Engineering time has always been the scarcest resource, but with AI agents, velocity will skyrocket, and software will become abundant "the only limit now is your imagination"

OpenAI Head of DevEx, Romain Huet: The cost of building software is trending toward zero Engineering time has always been the scarcest resource, but with AI agents, velocity will skyrocket, and software will become abundant "the only limit now is your imagination"

Haider.

56,928 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Jensen Huang says computing is no longer pre-recorded or pre-compiled. Traditional software like Excel ran the same for everyone now AI adapts to each user and moment. Every sound, pixel, and output is generated in real time based on context. This requires massively more compute, as software now thinks before it responds. It marks a fundamental shift: software isn’t static—it’s alive and reactive.

Jensen Huang says computing is no longer pre-recorded or pre-compiled. Traditional software like Excel ran the same for everyone now AI adapts to each user and moment. Every sound, pixel, and output is generated in real time based on context. This requires massively more compute, as software now thinks before it responds. It marks a fundamental shift: software isn’t static—it’s alive and reactive.

Wes Roth

24,319 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The video you've been waiting for OpenClaw is the greatest AI software ever made, but 99% of people have NO idea what to do with it In this video I cover 5 SIMPLE use cases you can implement today that will instantly make your life so much easier:

The video you've been waiting for OpenClaw is the greatest AI software ever made, but 99% of people have NO idea what to do with it In this video I cover 5 SIMPLE use cases you can implement today that will instantly make your life so much easier:

Alex Finn

108,780 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Jensen Huang just said this is the greatest era in history to build software. AI agents will not kill software. They will do the exact opposite: create a massive new wave of software demand. at NVIDIA GTC Taipei 2026 "Click and type. We now replace that with explaining to the AI what we want, our intent, and the AI generates the code or uses tools to produce the necessary output. This is how computers are going to work in the future. This is Agentic AI. For two years, we've been building toward this, and now it has arrived. One of the big breakthroughs, of course, is tool use. A lot of people have said, “Jensen, AI is coming. Agentic AI is coming. Therefore, all the software companies are going to go out of business.” This is exactly the opposite. Because there are going to be so many agents, the world is no longer limited by the number of people. Therefore, those agents are going to use more tools than ever. This is actually an incredible time to be a software company. But the software has to be presented to the agent in a way that the agent can use it. This is a big breakthrough. And in fact, what we have done, as you know, what Nvidia’s treasure..." ---- From 'NVIDIA' YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

16,584 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei: "We might be 6-12 months away from models doing all of what software engineers do end-to-end”.

Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei: "We might be 6-12 months away from models doing all of what software engineers do end-to-end”.

CG

920,909 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce