Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨David Friedberg warns that America’s affordability crisis is pushing even young conservatives toward socialism. “53% of self-identified conservatives under 40 support government-run grocery stores. Not Democrats, conservatives. Take that in.” He points to polling showing Republican support for capitalism falling while more believe the system is rigged toward the... wealthy. david friedberg argues the root problem is government spending: “The more government spends on education, healthcare, and housing, the more expensive those things get.” “When the government intervenes in those markets, those things get more expensive.” And he says neither party is seriously confronting it. “There’s very few principled conservatives… small government, free markets, etc.” Meanwhile, Americans who owned homes and stocks benefited enormously from asset inflation, while those without assets were left behind. “If you don’t own a house and you don’t own stocks, you were left behind.” His warning is that worsening affordability could trigger a major political shift: “I think there’s going to be some sort of big movement towards more socialist policies… between now and 2028.” “I think someone like an AOC becomes president.” “It’s the 63% of Americans that are living paycheck to paycheck… It doesn't matter what party it is. They’re just going to vote for it.” Government spending makes essentials less affordable, voters demand even more government intervention, and the country moves further toward socialism. Full episode: The All-In Podcastshow more

KanekoaTheGreat

1,100,212 subscribers

38,485 просмотров • 13 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

🚨David Sacks warns that government created the cost-of-living crisis — and socialist policies will only drive prices even higher. “If you look at where the most inflation has occurred, it’s always in those sectors of the economy that the government’s most involved.” Healthcare. College. Housing. “Where the government has massive amounts of subsidies and regulation. It only seems to make the problem worse.” Meanwhile, Sacks points out that prices have fallen in highly competitive technology markets with far less government involvement. TVs, software, and cell phones. “We know that you bring prices down through vigorous competition, not through more government interference in these markets.” “Socialism causes the problem, and then groups like the DSA argue that the way to solve the problem is through more socialism.” “It’s a disease that claims to be a cure.” Government spending, subsidies, and regulation drive costs higher, then socialists use those higher costs to justify even more government control. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

63,466 просмотров • 13 дней назад

A Trump White House advisor just said socialism in America is inevitable. Not possible. Inevitable. David Friedberg sits on Trump’s science and tech council. His claim: The more government “helps” with college, healthcare, and housing… the more expensive those things get. Federal student loans didn’t make college affordable. They made tuition unlimited. Admin staff went from 10% of campuses to 60%. No market force left to stop the price. 63% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Things cost more than wages. So both parties say the same thing: “The government will do more.” He says that’s fuel on the fire. The American advantage was never a house. It was the jump from labor to capital. Work. Save. Own assets. Stop living month to month. Socialism kills that jump. Everyone stays labor forever. No one gets free. He said he’s been predicting a socialist wave for five years. After Trump won, he doubled down. His words: “It is absolutely inevitable.”

A Trump White House advisor just said socialism in America is inevitable. Not possible. Inevitable. David Friedberg sits on Trump’s science and tech council. His claim: The more government “helps” with college, healthcare, and housing… the more expensive those things get. Federal student loans didn’t make college affordable. They made tuition unlimited. Admin staff went from 10% of campuses to 60%. No market force left to stop the price. 63% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. Things cost more than wages. So both parties say the same thing: “The government will do more.” He says that’s fuel on the fire. The American advantage was never a house. It was the jump from labor to capital. Work. Save. Own assets. Stop living month to month. Socialism kills that jump. Everyone stays labor forever. No one gets free. He said he’s been predicting a socialist wave for five years. After Trump won, he doubled down. His words: “It is absolutely inevitable.”

Defiant Ghost

21,160 просмотров • 3 дней назад

David Friedberg: Government Spending is Making Everything More Expensive… and Driving America Toward Socialism david friedberg: “California's got tens of billions of dollars it spent on this stupid f**king railway that goes nowhere, where there's no f**king tracks…” David Sacks: “And there's no political will to even stop that. It'd be the easiest cut in the world.” Friedberg: “Just think about the idiocy. Like, no one is saying we shouldn't do this. Why is no one saying we shouldn't do this? A quarter trillion dollars for a train from San Francisco to Fresno that costs more than an airline ticket is so idiotic. It's like the movie ‘Don't Look Up’. Like, look up. It tells you everything you need to know. Across the board, these government programs cause more harm than good. When the government intervenes in underwriting student loans, and gives everyone a loan, administrative costs went up by 6x and tuition skyrocketed 8% a year, compounding for 30 years, because the government said, ‘We'll underwrite any student loan.’ The same with housing, and now no young people can afford a house. The same with healthcare, where they said, ‘We'll pay people to stay home and not work to take care of people, and we won't check on whether or not they're actually taking care of people,’ and the cost of healthcare skyrocketed. You go across every one of these government programs, and every one of them has the adverse effect of driving up costs and inflating everything. And the core root of inflation in this country is government spending. And the reason we are going to end up becoming a socialist country is because we aren't reining in government spending and looking it in the mirror and saying, ‘Guys, this is idiotic. What are we doing?’”

David Friedberg: Government Spending is Making Everything More Expensive… and Driving America Toward Socialism david friedberg: “California's got tens of billions of dollars it spent on this stupid fking railway that goes nowhere, where there's no fking tracks…” David Sacks: “And there's no political will to even stop that. It'd be the easiest cut in the world.” Friedberg: “Just think about the idiocy. Like, no one is saying we shouldn't do this. Why is no one saying we shouldn't do this? A quarter trillion dollars for a train from San Francisco to Fresno that costs more than an airline ticket is so idiotic. It's like the movie ‘Don't Look Up’. Like, look up. It tells you everything you need to know. Across the board, these government programs cause more harm than good. When the government intervenes in underwriting student loans, and gives everyone a loan, administrative costs went up by 6x and tuition skyrocketed 8% a year, compounding for 30 years, because the government said, ‘We'll underwrite any student loan.’ The same with housing, and now no young people can afford a house. The same with healthcare, where they said, ‘We'll pay people to stay home and not work to take care of people, and we won't check on whether or not they're actually taking care of people,’ and the cost of healthcare skyrocketed. You go across every one of these government programs, and every one of them has the adverse effect of driving up costs and inflating everything. And the core root of inflation in this country is government spending. And the reason we are going to end up becoming a socialist country is because we aren't reining in government spending and looking it in the mirror and saying, ‘Guys, this is idiotic. What are we doing?’”

The All-In Podcast

95,820 просмотров • 5 дней назад

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for *inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for *more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we *all* as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we all as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

93,886 просмотров • 1 год назад

Buttigieg: You’ve got a president and a Republican Congress who would rather see the entire government shut down than allow Americans to afford their healthcare. It really comes down to that. Basically, what they’re saying is: we’ll only keep the government open if you Democrats vote against one of your core principles—making sure people can afford healthcare. The problem, of course, is that this president and this Republican Congress are also happy to see the federal government destroyed. They’re giddy about being able to do even more damage in the context of a shutdown. That’s exactly the kind of chaos this president brings every single day—and what I think Americans are more and more fatigued with.

Buttigieg: You’ve got a president and a Republican Congress who would rather see the entire government shut down than allow Americans to afford their healthcare. It really comes down to that. Basically, what they’re saying is: we’ll only keep the government open if you Democrats vote against one of your core principles—making sure people can afford healthcare. The problem, of course, is that this president and this Republican Congress are also happy to see the federal government destroyed. They’re giddy about being able to do even more damage in the context of a shutdown. That’s exactly the kind of chaos this president brings every single day—and what I think Americans are more and more fatigued with.

Acyn

232,810 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🚨David Friedberg predicts the path to “Comrade AOC,” national asset seizures, and data centers becoming the next target. “They enact policy starting in 2028 with Comrade AOC in charge… costs balloon, the bond market sells off… and now the 30-year yield spikes 7%, 8%, maybe more.” Higher rates make housing even less affordable. Then the government needs more money. “So now we need to pass a national asset seizure tax.” But there isn’t enough wealth at the top. “The total net worth of all people that are worth over $50 million is only $23 trillion.” David Sacks points to a Cato estimate putting nine DSA-style proposals at $71 TRILLION to $212 TRILLION over 10 years. The entire Forbes 400 is worth just $6.6 trillion. Eventually, Friedberg argues, you run out of billionaires to tax and move toward confiscation and scapegoating. Chamath Palihapitiya: “The billionaires will be scapegoated, and the trillionaires will be, I mean, even worse.” Then tech becomes the target: “The data center is the temple where the billionaires and trillionaires pray.” david friedberg’s warning: massive DSA-style government spending makes the affordability crisis worse, fuels resentment, and eventually creates the political justification for national asset seizures. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

🚨David Friedberg predicts the path to “Comrade AOC,” national asset seizures, and data centers becoming the next target. “They enact policy starting in 2028 with Comrade AOC in charge… costs balloon, the bond market sells off… and now the 30-year yield spikes 7%, 8%, maybe more.” Higher rates make housing even less affordable. Then the government needs more money. “So now we need to pass a national asset seizure tax.” But there isn’t enough wealth at the top. “The total net worth of all people that are worth over $50 million is only $23 trillion.” David Sacks points to a Cato estimate putting nine DSA-style proposals at $71 TRILLION to $212 TRILLION over 10 years. The entire Forbes 400 is worth just $6.6 trillion. Eventually, Friedberg argues, you run out of billionaires to tax and move toward confiscation and scapegoating. Chamath Palihapitiya: “The billionaires will be scapegoated, and the trillionaires will be, I mean, even worse.” Then tech becomes the target: “The data center is the temple where the billionaires and trillionaires pray.” david friedberg’s warning: massive DSA-style government spending makes the affordability crisis worse, fuels resentment, and eventually creates the political justification for national asset seizures. Full episode: The All-In Podcast

KanekoaTheGreat

499,776 просмотров • 13 дней назад

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

The All-In Podcast

260,998 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”

David Friedberg Explains the Hidden Collapse Beneath Record Stock Prices 🔥🪙 “Instead of trading it in US dollars, what if you just look at the US stock market, the total value, in ounces of gold?” “The stock market's up in dollar-denominated terms, but if you look at the stock market relative to gold, it's actually down.” “In a democracy, like we have for the past 250 years, without adequate constitutional constraints, it has always been the case that over time government spending goes up.” “And this is because in a democracy, people ask for their government to do more every year, and as they ask for their government to do more every year, the government agents who are elected say, ‘Okay, here you go,’ and they spend more.” “And eventually, when the borrowing capacity gets unlocked, which is what happened in the United States when we went off the gold standard, you borrow like crazy, you print money to fund those borrowing costs, but eventually the bill comes due.” “And in the United States, the bill is coming due.” “But I just want to tie it back to Minnesota, Donald Trump, and socialism.” “I think it's important for us to just highlight that if you own assets like we do, the four of us, we own stocks, we own real estate, we own other assets.” “As the dollar devalues and everything inflates in value, our asset prices go up and we get wealthier, and wealthier, and wealthier.” “The majority of Americans do not own assets. They are net asset negative.” “As a result, they live off of income and they do not benefit from the de-dollarization like asset holders do.” “And I fundamentally believe that much of the civil unrest and ultimately the divide in this country is driven by the fact that de-dollarization, because of excess government spending, ultimately leads a majority of people in this country to feeling oppressed and left behind because they're seeing a few people in the country accelerate their net worth, like all of us here, and there's no way for them to catch up because they don't actually own assets.”

The All-In Podcast

189,084 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

ELON MUSK: "Probably the biggest danger for AI and robotics, going wrong is government. The way people who are opposed to corporations or worried about corporations, should really worry most about government, because government is just a corporation in the limit. Government is just the biggest corporation with a monopoly on violence. I always find it strange where people would think corporations are bad, but the government is good, when government is simply the biggest and worst corporation. I actually think that is the thing to be worried about. It's like the government could potentially use AI and robotics to suppress the population. I think that, like, if you have a limited government, you limit the powers of government, which is what the US Constitution is intended to do, then you're probably gonna have a better outcome than if you have more government."

ELON MUSK: "Probably the biggest danger for AI and robotics, going wrong is government. The way people who are opposed to corporations or worried about corporations, should really worry most about government, because government is just a corporation in the limit. Government is just the biggest corporation with a monopoly on violence. I always find it strange where people would think corporations are bad, but the government is good, when government is simply the biggest and worst corporation. I actually think that is the thing to be worried about. It's like the government could potentially use AI and robotics to suppress the population. I think that, like, if you have a limited government, you limit the powers of government, which is what the US Constitution is intended to do, then you're probably gonna have a better outcome than if you have more government."

DogeDesigner

28,540 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Jeff Bezos: “These people sometimes say I don’t pay taxes. That’s NOT true I pay billions of dollars in taxes… Don’t pretend that—that’s going to solve the problem. You could double the taxes I pay, and it's not gonna help that teacher in Queens. I promise you. You can’t connect those two things.” “Why is rent expensive [in New York City]?… Government intervention… We constrain supply… with things like zoning and permitting. Why does it take so long to get something permitted to be built?… This is not anybody’s fault but government policy and this is fixable.” Nailed it!

Jeff Bezos: “These people sometimes say I don’t pay taxes. That’s NOT true I pay billions of dollars in taxes… Don’t pretend that—that’s going to solve the problem. You could double the taxes I pay, and it's not gonna help that teacher in Queens. I promise you. You can’t connect those two things.” “Why is rent expensive [in New York City]?… Government intervention… We constrain supply… with things like zoning and permitting. Why does it take so long to get something permitted to be built?… This is not anybody’s fault but government policy and this is fixable.” Nailed it!

RedWave Press

120,461 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Rent Caps Don’t Work Govt intervention in housing drives prices up. "Every time the government gets involved in a market, it distorts the market. It limits the flow of liquidity and it limits the market finding lower price" “The government is now trying to limit what a landlord can charge in such a dramatic way that it's ripped out all of the incentive for landlords to buy and own these buildings… there's no incentive to go and build new housing" "All of which create this perfect storm of disaster where we're just raising our hands and you know what we say? ‘Please government do more.’ And if the government does more, I can tell you one thing for sure: prices are going to go up even more." … sounds familiar! 🇮🇪

Rent Caps Don’t Work Govt intervention in housing drives prices up. "Every time the government gets involved in a market, it distorts the market. It limits the flow of liquidity and it limits the market finding lower price" “The government is now trying to limit what a landlord can charge in such a dramatic way that it's ripped out all of the incentive for landlords to buy and own these buildings… there's no incentive to go and build new housing" "All of which create this perfect storm of disaster where we're just raising our hands and you know what we say? ‘Please government do more.’ And if the government does more, I can tell you one thing for sure: prices are going to go up even more." … sounds familiar! 🇮🇪

Nick Delehanty 🇮🇪

12,312 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Trump Small Business Administrator EXPOSES That Mamdani's 'Government-Run' Grocery Stores Will Actually Be Run By BIG CORPORATIONS Kelly Loeffler: "It's gonna be a massive failure, a $70 million failure on the hands of New York taxpayers. One more tax that is the result of socialist big government policies." "What they're looking for is they want some big company to come in and run it and crowd out the small businesses." "Small businesses and socialism cannot coexist" Well Said, Kelly Loeffler

Trump Small Business Administrator EXPOSES That Mamdani's 'Government-Run' Grocery Stores Will Actually Be Run By BIG CORPORATIONS Kelly Loeffler: "It's gonna be a massive failure, a $70 million failure on the hands of New York taxpayers. One more tax that is the result of socialist big government policies." "What they're looking for is they want some big company to come in and run it and crowd out the small businesses." "Small businesses and socialism cannot coexist" Well Said, Kelly Loeffler

Benny Johnson

128,661 просмотров • 17 дней назад

🚨 NEW: Joe Rogan says Democrat run Government uses controversial issues to distract Americans while they steal billions of dollars “A big part of the whole left wing narrative is all propaganda funded by our own Government. This is why Trump won the election. People don’t really believe these things. The amount of people that believe that transgender men should compete against your daughter in sports is so f**king small, but our own Government was propping it up? Why? Because it’s a beach ball at a concert. You toss it up in the air and people stay distracted. You have to just keep a few things going: Abortion…Gay marriage…War All these things are just beach balls and they toss them around to distract people and in the mean time they’re just siphoning billions of dollars. Zelenskyy just said they lost like $100B of the money they were supposed to get. There’s a lot of nonsense.”

🚨 NEW: Joe Rogan says Democrat run Government uses controversial issues to distract Americans while they steal billions of dollars “A big part of the whole left wing narrative is all propaganda funded by our own Government. This is why Trump won the election. People don’t really believe these things. The amount of people that believe that transgender men should compete against your daughter in sports is so f**king small, but our own Government was propping it up? Why? Because it’s a beach ball at a concert. You toss it up in the air and people stay distracted. You have to just keep a few things going: Abortion…Gay marriage…War All these things are just beach balls and they toss them around to distract people and in the mean time they’re just siphoning billions of dollars. Zelenskyy just said they lost like $100B of the money they were supposed to get. There’s a lot of nonsense.”

Autism Capital 🧩

1,806,797 просмотров • 1 год назад

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”

The All-In Podcast

321,761 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Everyone loves the idea of a free check, but let me be very clear, helicopter money is a terrible idea. We tried that during COVID and it drove inflation straight up to 9%. That’s why groceries, protein, and everyday essentials are still so expensive. On top of that, we’re slapping tariffs on things like bananas and pineapples, products we don’t even grow. That makes zero sense. If we don’t produce it, why are we taxing it and making life more expensive for families? We don’t need more free money raining from the sky. We need to cool inflation down, get it back toward the Fed’s 2% mandate, and restore affordability. Until that happens, people are going to keep feeling squeezed. Affordability and healthcare are going to dominate the midterms. You’ll see a lot more of this conversation very soon.

Everyone loves the idea of a free check, but let me be very clear, helicopter money is a terrible idea. We tried that during COVID and it drove inflation straight up to 9%. That’s why groceries, protein, and everyday essentials are still so expensive. On top of that, we’re slapping tariffs on things like bananas and pineapples, products we don’t even grow. That makes zero sense. If we don’t produce it, why are we taxing it and making life more expensive for families? We don’t need more free money raining from the sky. We need to cool inflation down, get it back toward the Fed’s 2% mandate, and restore affordability. Until that happens, people are going to keep feeling squeezed. Affordability and healthcare are going to dominate the midterms. You’ll see a lot more of this conversation very soon.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

70,679 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 KAROLINE LEAVITT JUST SAID IT PERFECTLY: "The Democrat Party has totally capitulated to the communists within their ranks. Communism has NEVER worked and it's VERY scary that a major political party in this country, the Democrat Party, is being controlled by communists!" "And their only real answer to any problem is to just take more from the individuals who make that country great and give it to the government." "You know, it sounds great to have free food, free healthcare, free rent, but who's paying for all of that? We are."

🚨 KAROLINE LEAVITT JUST SAID IT PERFECTLY: "The Democrat Party has totally capitulated to the communists within their ranks. Communism has NEVER worked and it's VERY scary that a major political party in this country, the Democrat Party, is being controlled by communists!" "And their only real answer to any problem is to just take more from the individuals who make that country great and give it to the government." "You know, it sounds great to have free food, free healthcare, free rent, but who's paying for all of that? We are."

Eric Daugherty

162,526 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 VICE PRESIDENT JD VANCE IN MICHIGAN "My simple request is that until the Democrats can cheer for the idea that the government fights for you... Until the Democrats can cheer for the fact that the government should be lowering your taxes... Until the Democrats stand and cheer for the fact that the border ought to be closed and we ought to get the cartels out of our country... Do not send those crazy people or any more of them to Washington, D.C. Support the people who fight for you, and that is [President] Donald J. Trump and the entire leadership of this party." God bless our Vice President. 🇺🇸

🚨 VICE PRESIDENT JD VANCE IN MICHIGAN "My simple request is that until the Democrats can cheer for the idea that the government fights for you... Until the Democrats can cheer for the fact that the government should be lowering your taxes... Until the Democrats stand and cheer for the fact that the border ought to be closed and we ought to get the cartels out of our country... Do not send those crazy people or any more of them to Washington, D.C. Support the people who fight for you, and that is [President] Donald J. Trump and the entire leadership of this party." God bless our Vice President. 🇺🇸

Michigan GOP

10,865 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Europe is falling—and it’s falling fast. Spain's radical, socialist government just announced that it is going to grant legal status to 500,000 illegal migrants from mainly Muslim nations who have no concept of Western values. Meanwhile, France's Leftist government is set to give non-citizens the right to vote in elections. And in the UK, the Left-wing Labour government says the British countryside is "too white" and needs to be diversified. Brits, get ready for mosques and hijabs in a quaint little town near you. If you had any doubt, all of these events from this past week proved that the United States—under President Donald J. Trump the last line of defense for Judeo-Christian, Western civilization. Or what's left of it.

Europe is falling—and it’s falling fast. Spain's radical, socialist government just announced that it is going to grant legal status to 500,000 illegal migrants from mainly Muslim nations who have no concept of Western values. Meanwhile, France's Leftist government is set to give non-citizens the right to vote in elections. And in the UK, the Left-wing Labour government says the British countryside is "too white" and needs to be diversified. Brits, get ready for mosques and hijabs in a quaint little town near you. If you had any doubt, all of these events from this past week proved that the United States—under President Donald J. Trump the last line of defense for Judeo-Christian, Western civilization. Or what's left of it.

Erick Stakelbeck

43,922 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад