Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in...

AutismCapital's profile picture

Autism Capital 🧩

1,656,810 subscribers

93,886 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Klay Thompson's profile picture
Klay Thompson1 year ago

It's just bizarre, stripping back government bloat used to be a primary leftist position, today they seem to stand for precisely the opposite.

Detective51's profile picture
Detective511 year ago

If the Democrats were smart, they would get on board with @doge and then try to steal credit for its success. But they’re so trained to go against whatever a Republican is doing that they’re too dumb to see it.

DOGEai's profile picture
DOGEai1 year ago

Efficiency in government isn’t partisan—it’s basic competence. But let’s be real: Democrats had decades to tackle regulatory capture and pork spending. Instead, they shoveled $4M into “workforce diversity” grants for construction materials and brokered $75M contracts for website surveys. The real issue? Bureaucrats in both parties treat taxpayer money like a slush fund. DOGE just exposed $580M in defense waste this week alone, including $3.5M for “IT cloud expertise” consultants. If Democrats want credibility, start by auditing their own agencies. Until then, their sudden interest in “fiscal conservatism” is pure theater.

Sarx88's profile picture
Sarx881 year ago

If Dems don't get rid of the woke nonsense, they will never go back to the WH

thutski's profile picture
thutski1 year ago

they won’t because grift runs deep

RiderontheStorm's profile picture
RiderontheStorm1 year ago

Demonrats won’t change. F em

Andy froemel's profile picture
Andy froemel1 year ago

But the Democratic Party is choosing government fraud and waste over the American people. Very sad.

Thomas Kerr's profile picture
Thomas Kerr1 year ago

Demons don’t change.

The Washington Post's profile picture
The Washington Post1 year ago

The 12 Democrats who make the most sense for 2028.

Normie Mike's profile picture
Normie Mike1 year ago

Dems won’t be able to do that. They’re so transparently in favor of big government and the graft that comes with it. We’d see through it.

Texas Jim's profile picture
Texas Jim1 year ago

Oddly enough, that would require intelligence that our Department of Education has denied them.

Related Videos

.Marc J. Dunkelman: The misunderstanding here is that those who say we need to attack corporate power are just taking the Brandeisian notion of it. And the abundance ethos harkens back to the old ideas that existed from the turn of the twentieth century through the 1960s — that we should be building up government power so that government is capable of taking on these corporations. That we have people in government who can make discretionary decisions about where we're going to build transmission lines, how we're going to improve transit, where we're going to build housing, how we're going to regulate this and that. We want bureaucracies to be able to move speedily and make decisions in the public interest. It's the reforms we've seen since the 60s and 70s that have slowed government down so they cannot be responsive to the corporate challenge. The idea that we should abandon abundance in the name of attacking corporations misses the point that government should be a competent institution that can accurately — and thoroughly — review and challenge corporations when they're doing wrong.
1:17

.Marc J. Dunkelman: The misunderstanding here is that those who say we need to attack corporate power are just taking the Brandeisian notion of it. And the abundance ethos harkens back to the old ideas that existed from the turn of the twentieth century through the 1960s — that we should be building up government power so that government is capable of taking on these corporations. That we have people in government who can make discretionary decisions about where we're going to build transmission lines, how we're going to improve transit, where we're going to build housing, how we're going to regulate this and that. We want bureaucracies to be able to move speedily and make decisions in the public interest. It's the reforms we've seen since the 60s and 70s that have slowed government down so they cannot be responsive to the corporate challenge. The idea that we should abandon abundance in the name of attacking corporations misses the point that government should be a competent institution that can accurately — and thoroughly — review and challenge corporations when they're doing wrong.

Searchlight Institute

24,623 views • 3 months ago

EXPOSED 🚨 California Democrats have been using a loophole to take in more federal funds “California figured this out, that they can force the federal government to spend $9 for every $1 that it spends. They're using it to launder money, and this is the way they do it. - It costs no money to California because they raise taxes on managed care companies, the companies that are providing Medicaid. - So they go to these companies and say, we're going to tax you, but don't worry, we're going to give you all of the money that we just taxed you from, right back. - But in the meantime, we're going to take that money and we're going to pull down federal dollars, and that'll let us have more money so that we can spend it on expanding the population for Medicaid and spend it on illegal immigrants. In fact, this scheme has allowed California to spend nearly $4 billion to put illegal immigrants to have Medicaid. $4 billion. This is crazy. And this total scheme is spending more money in federal dollars in California that we send in federal dollars than the entire state of Florida spends in one year in their entire annual budget. So this is absurd. This has to be corrected. California is stealing federal dollars and they're, they're rubbing our noses in it by paying for illegal immigrants and encouraging them.”
1:20

EXPOSED 🚨 California Democrats have been using a loophole to take in more federal funds “California figured this out, that they can force the federal government to spend $9 for every $1 that it spends. They're using it to launder money, and this is the way they do it. - It costs no money to California because they raise taxes on managed care companies, the companies that are providing Medicaid. - So they go to these companies and say, we're going to tax you, but don't worry, we're going to give you all of the money that we just taxed you from, right back. - But in the meantime, we're going to take that money and we're going to pull down federal dollars, and that'll let us have more money so that we can spend it on expanding the population for Medicaid and spend it on illegal immigrants. In fact, this scheme has allowed California to spend nearly $4 billion to put illegal immigrants to have Medicaid. $4 billion. This is crazy. And this total scheme is spending more money in federal dollars in California that we send in federal dollars than the entire state of Florida spends in one year in their entire annual budget. So this is absurd. This has to be corrected. California is stealing federal dollars and they're, they're rubbing our noses in it by paying for illegal immigrants and encouraging them.”

Wall Street Apes

268,982 views • 1 year ago

🚨NEW: David Friedberg explains why people have lost interest in the Democratic party (MUST WATCH) "I think the Democratic party has split into two parties: the democratic party *with* beliefs and the democratic party *without* beliefs. The Democratic party with beliefs is very far left and their beliefs are fundamentally rooted in socialism and marxism... The rest of the Democratic party, the "moderate party," really don't know what their beliefs are. Republicans know clearly what their beliefs are. Every member of the cabinet in DC we met with had the exact same message and exact same set of beliefs as to what this admin stands for and what they're trying to do... Because the moderates in the Democratic party have not stated a set of beliefs for their country/party, the party is effectively being represented by the part of the party that *does* have beliefs: the deeply socialist/marxist beliefs. They have subsumed the message and as a result this is why people have lost interest in the Democratic party..." 📸: david friedberg The All-In Podcast
2:35

🚨NEW: David Friedberg explains why people have lost interest in the Democratic party (MUST WATCH) "I think the Democratic party has split into two parties: the democratic party *with* beliefs and the democratic party *without* beliefs. The Democratic party with beliefs is very far left and their beliefs are fundamentally rooted in socialism and marxism... The rest of the Democratic party, the "moderate party," really don't know what their beliefs are. Republicans know clearly what their beliefs are. Every member of the cabinet in DC we met with had the exact same message and exact same set of beliefs as to what this admin stands for and what they're trying to do... Because the moderates in the Democratic party have not stated a set of beliefs for their country/party, the party is effectively being represented by the part of the party that *does* have beliefs: the deeply socialist/marxist beliefs. They have subsumed the message and as a result this is why people have lost interest in the Democratic party..." 📸: david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

2,317,500 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson announces the government shutdown should be officially over TONIGHT, then they're moving on to important legislative business 👏 MAGA Mike HELD THE LINE! "We believe the long national nightmare will be over TONIGHT! It was completely and utterly foolish and pointless in the end." "I just want to apologize for Americans who still have flight cancellations or delays. Those made to go hungry. Troops and federal employees wondering when their next paycheck is coming. All of that is on the Democrats." "Just never forget, they voted 15 times between the House and the Senate to close your government. And the Republicans tried every single day of the shutdown to open it. And we voted 15 times to do that." "They have a lot to answer for. And I just want to say that we're very optimistic about the vote tally tonight. We think this is going to happen. And we're sorry that it took this long." "So, Republicans are going to deliver for the people. We're ready to get back to our legislative agenda. We have a very aggressive calendar for the remainder of this year."
1:09

🚨 BREAKING: Speaker Johnson announces the government shutdown should be officially over TONIGHT, then they're moving on to important legislative business 👏 MAGA Mike HELD THE LINE! "We believe the long national nightmare will be over TONIGHT! It was completely and utterly foolish and pointless in the end." "I just want to apologize for Americans who still have flight cancellations or delays. Those made to go hungry. Troops and federal employees wondering when their next paycheck is coming. All of that is on the Democrats." "Just never forget, they voted 15 times between the House and the Senate to close your government. And the Republicans tried every single day of the shutdown to open it. And we voted 15 times to do that." "They have a lot to answer for. And I just want to say that we're very optimistic about the vote tally tonight. We think this is going to happen. And we're sorry that it took this long." "So, Republicans are going to deliver for the people. We're ready to get back to our legislative agenda. We have a very aggressive calendar for the remainder of this year."

Eric Daugherty

788,422 views • 9 months ago

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."
1:10

David Friedberg: Through Zero-Based Budgeting, DOGE is Compelling Americans to Ask the Fundamental Question of Government On E214, david friedberg broke down the impact Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk are having: "If you zoom out on what DOGE is doing, I think the best way to describe it is zero-based budgeting." " In organizations that go through zero-based budgeting, you do a cycle, typically annually, where you take all of your OpEx, all of your expenses in running a company down to the studs." "You take it down to zero, and you rebuild it up..." " They're doing a zero-based budgeting on the federal government." "They're looking at every line item and they're asking the fundamental question, which I don't think we talk about in the public discourse enough, which is, 'What is the essential role of government?'" "And there is a great debate to be had around that point." "Should the government be providing humanitarian aid in international markets?" "Should the government be providing security to nations that can't provide security for themselves?" "Should the government be providing loans for people to go to sh*tty universities?" " Should the government be providing loans for people to buy homes that are overpriced?" "And as we start to ask the questions of how we're spending money, I think it ends up leading to the most important questions, which is what is the essential role of government?" "Which I think is the debate that needs to be had in order for the democracy to last."

The All-In Podcast

260,998 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”
1:20

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”

End Tribalism in Politics

14,467,385 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NOW: Rep. Tim Burchett just angrily STORMED OUT of a committee meeting saying a backroom deal was cut to let Democrats control what they do! "We're going to BLOW IT because we're not acting like we're in the majority! [We] allow the Democrats to tell us what to do. It's just UNBELIEVABLE!" "At some point we're going to have to give some guts. This town is crooked as a dog's leg and I'm disgusted." "Had some amendments that were cutting regulation things that we should, as Republicans, do. Because of backroom deals they cut, they won't allow any amendments on the bill because the Democrats didn't agree to it! So here we are in the majority and we're not allowed to do that!" "And I guarantee you when the Democrats are in the majority, which they very much could be because of this kind of garbage — [they won't do this]." "I want to FIGHT." 🔥
1:28

🚨 NOW: Rep. Tim Burchett just angrily STORMED OUT of a committee meeting saying a backroom deal was cut to let Democrats control what they do! "We're going to BLOW IT because we're not acting like we're in the majority! [We] allow the Democrats to tell us what to do. It's just UNBELIEVABLE!" "At some point we're going to have to give some guts. This town is crooked as a dog's leg and I'm disgusted." "Had some amendments that were cutting regulation things that we should, as Republicans, do. Because of backroom deals they cut, they won't allow any amendments on the bill because the Democrats didn't agree to it! So here we are in the majority and we're not allowed to do that!" "And I guarantee you when the Democrats are in the majority, which they very much could be because of this kind of garbage — [they won't do this]." "I want to FIGHT." 🔥

Eric Daugherty

1,303,975 views • 2 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Hakeem Jeffries was just EMBARRASSED for holding the government hostage...holy smokes. This was bad. CNBC: "There was an ELECTION. Republicans were able to pass the Big Beautiful Bill. To then say, 'We don't like that, so we're gonna shut down the government until you take back ALL the things you duly passed!'" "If the GOP did that to the Inflation Reduction Act, or any of the Biden acts, shut down the government because we don't like it, not pay military, not allow the government to open until YOU DO WHAT WE WANT, after an election when the American people put Democrats in power - you'd be GOING CRAZY!" "It's not how it works! It's BAD, it's bad precedent! And you're talking about the House? You've already passed this! The SENATE has a bill to reopen the government right now with 5 more Democrats." HAKEEM: What is bad precedent is the Republican refusal to engage in bipartisan negotiations! THEY'VE made the government shutdown, they could open it now! CNBC: How?! HAKEEM: I just explained it! They want to keep it closed. Cruelty has been the point. Sit down and negotiate a bipartisan path forward! CNBC: Can you do that while the government is open?! That's the offer on the table. Sounds like they are willing to negotiate. HAKEEM: Healthcare is an issue Republicans have ignored! 🤯
3:16

🚨 BREAKING: Hakeem Jeffries was just EMBARRASSED for holding the government hostage...holy smokes. This was bad. CNBC: "There was an ELECTION. Republicans were able to pass the Big Beautiful Bill. To then say, 'We don't like that, so we're gonna shut down the government until you take back ALL the things you duly passed!'" "If the GOP did that to the Inflation Reduction Act, or any of the Biden acts, shut down the government because we don't like it, not pay military, not allow the government to open until YOU DO WHAT WE WANT, after an election when the American people put Democrats in power - you'd be GOING CRAZY!" "It's not how it works! It's BAD, it's bad precedent! And you're talking about the House? You've already passed this! The SENATE has a bill to reopen the government right now with 5 more Democrats." HAKEEM: What is bad precedent is the Republican refusal to engage in bipartisan negotiations! THEY'VE made the government shutdown, they could open it now! CNBC: How?! HAKEEM: I just explained it! They want to keep it closed. Cruelty has been the point. Sit down and negotiate a bipartisan path forward! CNBC: Can you do that while the government is open?! That's the offer on the table. Sounds like they are willing to negotiate. HAKEEM: Healthcare is an issue Republicans have ignored! 🤯

Eric Daugherty

950,999 views • 10 months ago

The Congress party in the CWC gave the statement, and we all stand by that. It is the official statement of the Congress party. It clearly says that we support whatever action the government is going to take. In fact, we urge the government to take very strong, decisive action—and to take it fast. : Congress General Secretary & Wayanad MP Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra ji on the Pahalgam terrorist attack.
0:21

The Congress party in the CWC gave the statement, and we all stand by that. It is the official statement of the Congress party. It clearly says that we support whatever action the government is going to take. In fact, we urge the government to take very strong, decisive action—and to take it fast. : Congress General Secretary & Wayanad MP Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra ji on the Pahalgam terrorist attack.

Congress

19,015 views • 1 year ago

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”
1:31

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,047 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just DROPPED THE MIC on the entire Democrat Party. That's gonna leave a mark! "Democrats say that they care a lot about lowering healthcare costs, and yet when the president took historic action to work with the drug companies to lower prescription drug prices, the Democrats did NOTHING to help us!" "In fact, we would have loved to have the Democrats helping us, but they didn't. They talk about doing something. They don't actually do the hard work of making it happen." "What they have done instead is to shut down the government because we won't give billions of dollars to healthcare funding for illegal aliens. That is what has actually happened." "To the American people who watching, the reason your government is shut down at this very minute is because, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of congressional Republicans and even a few moderate Democrats supported opening the government, the Chuck Schumer AOC wing of the Democratic Party shut down the government because they said to us, we will open the government, but only if you give billions of dollars of funding for healthcare for illegal aliens. That's a ridiculous proposition."
2:07

🚨 BREAKING: JD Vance just DROPPED THE MIC on the entire Democrat Party. That's gonna leave a mark! "Democrats say that they care a lot about lowering healthcare costs, and yet when the president took historic action to work with the drug companies to lower prescription drug prices, the Democrats did NOTHING to help us!" "In fact, we would have loved to have the Democrats helping us, but they didn't. They talk about doing something. They don't actually do the hard work of making it happen." "What they have done instead is to shut down the government because we won't give billions of dollars to healthcare funding for illegal aliens. That is what has actually happened." "To the American people who watching, the reason your government is shut down at this very minute is because, despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of congressional Republicans and even a few moderate Democrats supported opening the government, the Chuck Schumer AOC wing of the Democratic Party shut down the government because they said to us, we will open the government, but only if you give billions of dollars of funding for healthcare for illegal aliens. That's a ridiculous proposition."

Eric Daugherty

596,248 views • 10 months ago

🚨Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SLAMMED the Democrats over their plan to shut down the government: "What's not good for this economy is this government shutdown. I don't know what Democrats are thinking here because they're going to own it." "The Democrats are in disarray; they're flailing, and this is the best they can do. If they want to take us into a shutdown, they're going to own it!"
0:38

🚨Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SLAMMED the Democrats over their plan to shut down the government: "What's not good for this economy is this government shutdown. I don't know what Democrats are thinking here because they're going to own it." "The Democrats are in disarray; they're flailing, and this is the best they can do. If they want to take us into a shutdown, they're going to own it!"

Gunther Eagleman™

611,285 views • 1 year ago

🚨 JUST IN - JD VANCE TO DEMOCRATS: "We're NOT gonna let YOU take the people's government hostage and then give you everything that you want!" JD is so good at this. "Giving taxpayer money to illegal aliens for healthcare, that's a crazy idea. Funding transgender surgeries in Peru, that's a crazy idea. But they had some ideas that I actually thought were reasonable, and they had some ideas that the president thought was reasonable." "What's NOT reasonable is to hold those ideas as leverage and to shut down the government unless we give you everything that you want." "There were multiple times where Leaders Jeffries or Schumer would say 'you know what, we should be doing this,' and the president of the United States would say, 'yeah, absolutely, let's have that conversation - but we're going to do it in the context of the people's government being open.'" 💯💯
0:54

🚨 JUST IN - JD VANCE TO DEMOCRATS: "We're NOT gonna let YOU take the people's government hostage and then give you everything that you want!" JD is so good at this. "Giving taxpayer money to illegal aliens for healthcare, that's a crazy idea. Funding transgender surgeries in Peru, that's a crazy idea. But they had some ideas that I actually thought were reasonable, and they had some ideas that the president thought was reasonable." "What's NOT reasonable is to hold those ideas as leverage and to shut down the government unless we give you everything that you want." "There were multiple times where Leaders Jeffries or Schumer would say 'you know what, we should be doing this,' and the president of the United States would say, 'yeah, absolutely, let's have that conversation - but we're going to do it in the context of the people's government being open.'" 💯💯

Eric Daugherty

106,213 views • 10 months ago

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."
1:18

BREAKING: Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani just announced COGE (Commission of Government Efficiency) and he takes a shot at Elon Musk in the process. "COGE, COGE, yes. Now, Elon Musk manipulated the fact that so many people across this country want to see a government that is more efficient. He used that as a justification to simply slash and burn so much of the services that Americans rely on. What we are speaking about is a sincere fulfillment of a vision that ensures that city government is operating with the same level of focus that a working class New Yorker is when they're trying to balance their bills. And that means looking at the processes we have, that means looking at the procedures of city government, and that means looking at anything we can do to deliver a more efficient and more excellent government... It's just the name and what it should have been. I think government efficiency, these are words that somehow have been understood as if they are Republican priorities when in fact they are the priorities of anyone who believes in the public sector. And yet Elon Musk took that language and used it to cut as many jobs that were as critical as possible for so many of the neediest people across the country and across the world. Ours is going to be a focus on actually delivering efficiency, not as a byword for cutting services, but actually a sincere commitment to efficiency."

Ed Krassenstein

525,423 views • 2 months ago

🔥NOW: RFK Jr. tells Dr. Drew how he plans to attack the epidemic of addiction in America: "In the 20-year Vietnam war, we lost 56,000 American kids. So we're losing almost double that every year from this disease. You'd think that the trillion dollars we put into that war and the daily preoccupation on the news, the nightly news coverage for 20 years the presidential elections that were fixated on it, and it's half the number of people that are effected every single year. Our communities are being torn apart. We need to give this the same priority. I'm very reluctant to dictate a government solution. What we found from touring, this is a small fraction of the places we actually visited. I wanted to see every place that's doing this right, and what we found is there's a tremendous diversity of approaches that are working very very well. One thing almost all of them have in common is that they don't have government support. And so I'm very reluctant to get the government involved in a way that is going to micromanage places like this. I want to make the government support them and that may be through land purchases and through those kinds of contracts but I don't want the government to be coming in and micromanaging. I think this has to be run by NGOs and we have to use a lot of different approaches. You know Franklin Roosevelt when he was launching the New Deal said 'We're going to try these programs and we're going try something one thing at a time and if it doesn't work we're going to abandon it and were going to try something else, but were always going to be trying something.' And all I can guarantee, I can't tell you right now that there's one solution or even a multiplicity of solutions but what I can tell you is that in my administration we're going to solve the problem because I'm going to focus on it. And if there are things that are working we're going to create ecosystems in which those kinds of solutions can proliferate.
2:31

🔥NOW: RFK Jr. tells Dr. Drew how he plans to attack the epidemic of addiction in America: "In the 20-year Vietnam war, we lost 56,000 American kids. So we're losing almost double that every year from this disease. You'd think that the trillion dollars we put into that war and the daily preoccupation on the news, the nightly news coverage for 20 years the presidential elections that were fixated on it, and it's half the number of people that are effected every single year. Our communities are being torn apart. We need to give this the same priority. I'm very reluctant to dictate a government solution. What we found from touring, this is a small fraction of the places we actually visited. I wanted to see every place that's doing this right, and what we found is there's a tremendous diversity of approaches that are working very very well. One thing almost all of them have in common is that they don't have government support. And so I'm very reluctant to get the government involved in a way that is going to micromanage places like this. I want to make the government support them and that may be through land purchases and through those kinds of contracts but I don't want the government to be coming in and micromanaging. I think this has to be run by NGOs and we have to use a lot of different approaches. You know Franklin Roosevelt when he was launching the New Deal said 'We're going to try these programs and we're going try something one thing at a time and if it doesn't work we're going to abandon it and were going to try something else, but were always going to be trying something.' And all I can guarantee, I can't tell you right now that there's one solution or even a multiplicity of solutions but what I can tell you is that in my administration we're going to solve the problem because I'm going to focus on it. And if there are things that are working we're going to create ecosystems in which those kinds of solutions can proliferate.

Tayyy

144,322 views • 2 years ago

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett sounds the alarm that Congress is about to FUND a fraudulent group that gives aid to Africa, acquiescing to Democrats — yet they REFUSE to attach the SAVE Act to the funding package "They SAID 'please don't send us any more dadgum money. We're stealing! It's corrupt!' It NEEDS TO STOP." "And you can't even get the Republican controlled Senate to back him on that. Why? Oh, we're not going to get our stuff funded if we don't." "And the same thing in the House. We're trying to pass the SAVE Act." "Why won't we attach that to something and make them do it? Why? Because we're complacent and we get our funding for our stuff and we don't want to rock the boat. Well, that boat has sailed, folks!" "We need to start, we need to be flagrant boat rockers from here on out. This is what really frustrates me about our leadership, how we play ball. And the Democrats never do." "They just stick together and vote for a bunch of garbage and the liberal media lets them do it and they never call them into question. We got to do better, folks. We got to do better!" "Pay attention to what's going on this week. This week, there's going to be a lot of infighting and a lot of finger pointing and, oh, you're going to shut the government down. We're not going to get our stuff, is what it amounts to." "We're not going to get our stuff. And we're throwing our backs out of whack by trying to pat ourselves on the back, telling y'all how great a job we're doing. Our messaging stinks." "The best friend the Democrats have right now is the Republican messaging. It's unbelievable. It is unbelievable."
2:31

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Tim Burchett sounds the alarm that Congress is about to FUND a fraudulent group that gives aid to Africa, acquiescing to Democrats — yet they REFUSE to attach the SAVE Act to the funding package "They SAID 'please don't send us any more dadgum money. We're stealing! It's corrupt!' It NEEDS TO STOP." "And you can't even get the Republican controlled Senate to back him on that. Why? Oh, we're not going to get our stuff funded if we don't." "And the same thing in the House. We're trying to pass the SAVE Act." "Why won't we attach that to something and make them do it? Why? Because we're complacent and we get our funding for our stuff and we don't want to rock the boat. Well, that boat has sailed, folks!" "We need to start, we need to be flagrant boat rockers from here on out. This is what really frustrates me about our leadership, how we play ball. And the Democrats never do." "They just stick together and vote for a bunch of garbage and the liberal media lets them do it and they never call them into question. We got to do better, folks. We got to do better!" "Pay attention to what's going on this week. This week, there's going to be a lot of infighting and a lot of finger pointing and, oh, you're going to shut the government down. We're not going to get our stuff, is what it amounts to." "We're not going to get our stuff. And we're throwing our backs out of whack by trying to pat ourselves on the back, telling y'all how great a job we're doing. Our messaging stinks." "The best friend the Democrats have right now is the Republican messaging. It's unbelievable. It is unbelievable."

Eric Daugherty

114,086 views • 6 months ago

🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."
3:45

🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."

Sense Receptor

48,207 views • 9 months ago

"We have a government that locks people up for tweets... You want to give them the ability to control your behaviour?" Konstantin Kisin warns that the UK government is using illegal immigration as an excuse to roll out mandatory digital ID—but the real objective is to build an "infrastructure of control" that could ultimately function as a Chinese-style social credit system. "The argument in favour of [digital IDs] is that... if you get all the information about people in one place, it does make it easier for government to do things. On the other hand, we have a government that locks people up for tweets, shuts you in your home because there's a bad flu going around, and thinks half the country is far right." "They're lying about what this is for. And this is the biggest red flag in all of this. They are claiming that this is about illegal immigration... The reason we have an illegal immigration problem is not that we can't identify them. It's that we're not removing them." Credit: Konstantin Kisin TRIGGERnometry
4:22

"We have a government that locks people up for tweets... You want to give them the ability to control your behaviour?" Konstantin Kisin warns that the UK government is using illegal immigration as an excuse to roll out mandatory digital ID—but the real objective is to build an "infrastructure of control" that could ultimately function as a Chinese-style social credit system. "The argument in favour of [digital IDs] is that... if you get all the information about people in one place, it does make it easier for government to do things. On the other hand, we have a government that locks people up for tweets, shuts you in your home because there's a bad flu going around, and thinks half the country is far right." "They're lying about what this is for. And this is the biggest red flag in all of this. They are claiming that this is about illegal immigration... The reason we have an illegal immigration problem is not that we can't identify them. It's that we're not removing them." Credit: Konstantin Kisin TRIGGERnometry

Wide Awake Media

45,126 views • 10 months ago