正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

David Reich doesn't think population size has been a big constraint on human evolution. Why? (1) The human genome already contains more than enough diversity for natural selection - we generally don't need to worry about having a large enough population for new mutations. (2) Sometimes if selection is... show more

Dwarkesh Patel

240,436 subscribers

26,455 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: For more content like this, visit: #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Speaking on a World Economic Forum panel, UN "Messenger of Peace", Jane Goodall, advocates reducing the global population down to 450 million—a 95% reduction from today's population: "We cannot hide away from human population growth. Because, you know, it underlies so many of the other problems. All these things we talk about wouldn't be a problem if there was the size of population that there was 500 years ago." Source: For more content like this, visit: #WorldEconomicForum #UnitedNations #DepopulationAgenda

Wide Awake Media

4,485,440 次观看 • 3 年前

Are humanoids the largest addressable market in history? Andrew Kang says "to understand that you have to look at what is the total market for human labor. It's something like 50% of GDP, some people put it at $40 trillion or $60 trillion." "The way that I would think about it is a humanoid can do everything that a human can do in the future, but it doesn't need to rest, it doesn't need to take breaks, it doesn't need to go on vacation. It's not going to quit on you, so you don't need to hire and retrain somebody else."

Are humanoids the largest addressable market in history? Andrew Kang says "to understand that you have to look at what is the total market for human labor. It's something like 50% of GDP, some people put it at $40 trillion or $60 trillion." "The way that I would think about it is a humanoid can do everything that a human can do in the future, but it doesn't need to rest, it doesn't need to take breaks, it doesn't need to go on vacation. It's not going to quit on you, so you don't need to hire and retrain somebody else."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

109,720 次观看 • 1 个月前

GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: The Transgender Movement Is The Political Cover For A Larger, Long-Term Directed Evolution Project Being Carried Out By DARPA— The Project's 3 Goals Are: (1) Sterilize/Depopulate 90% Of The Population Covertly Over Three Generations (2) Trigger/Force Hyper-Accelerated Mutations In The General Human Population In The Search For Life Extension Technologies (3) Destroy The Classical Definition Of What It Means To Be Human, Giving Rise To New Divergent Species WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:

GLOBAL EXCLUSIVE: The Transgender Movement Is The Political Cover For A Larger, Long-Term Directed Evolution Project Being Carried Out By DARPA— The Project's 3 Goals Are: (1) Sterilize/Depopulate 90% Of The Population Covertly Over Three Generations (2) Trigger/Force Hyper-Accelerated Mutations In The General Human Population In The Search For Life Extension Technologies (3) Destroy The Classical Definition Of What It Means To Be Human, Giving Rise To New Divergent Species WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE:

Alex Jones

215,247 次观看 • 1 年前

🔥 ELON MUSK: “MAKE MORE BABIES — OR WE DIE WITH A WHIMPER IN ADULT DIAPERS” Elon Musk didn’t sugarcoat it: “If we don’t have enough kids, we will die with a whimper in adult diapers, and that would be depressing.” “So yes, make more babies — at least enough to sustain the population.” Civilization needs children to survive.

🔥 ELON MUSK: “MAKE MORE BABIES — OR WE DIE WITH A WHIMPER IN ADULT DIAPERS” Elon Musk didn’t sugarcoat it: “If we don’t have enough kids, we will die with a whimper in adult diapers, and that would be depressing.” “So yes, make more babies — at least enough to sustain the population.” Civilization needs children to survive.

America News

14,089 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

Elon Musk: We might just be the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence. “They call it the singularity for a reason, because we don't know what's going to happen. In the not-too-distant future, the percentage of intelligence that is human will be quite small. At some point, the collective sum of human intelligence will be less than 1% of all intelligence. If things get to A Kardashev Level 2, we're talking about human intelligence. Even assuming a significant increase in human population and intelligence augmentation, like massive intelligence augmentation, where, like, everyone has an IQ of a thousand, even in that circumstance, collective human intelligence will probably be 1 billionth that of digital intelligence. We're the biological bootloader for digital superintelligence.” Interview at Y Combinator, June 16, 2025

ELON CLIPS

32,399 次观看 • 5 个月前

Why are there so few Muslim billionaires? Muslims make up 24% of the world population and 6% of billionaires. That's a quarter of the proportion it would be if there was a representative population. Muslims are the poorest demographic (by religion) in the UK. They are most likely to be subject to racism. Islamophobia is almost a state religion. There are, by contrast more than 50 times the number of Jewish billionaires in relation to their population in the world (0.2% of the population and 10% of the billionaires).

Why are there so few Muslim billionaires? Muslims make up 24% of the world population and 6% of billionaires. That's a quarter of the proportion it would be if there was a representative population. Muslims are the poorest demographic (by religion) in the UK. They are most likely to be subject to racism. Islamophobia is almost a state religion. There are, by contrast more than 50 times the number of Jewish billionaires in relation to their population in the world (0.2% of the population and 10% of the billionaires).

David Miller

17,013 次观看 • 2 个月前

David Reich is back. He and collaborator Ali Akbari just published a paper that overturns a long-standing consensus about human evolution — that natural selection has been dormant in our species since the agricultural revolution. By scaling ancient DNA sequencing and developing a new statistical method, they found that selection has actually sped up. Selection went especially bonkers during the Bronze Age (around 3,000 years ago). That's when gene frequencies for everything from immune function to body fat to intelligence were most in flux. Over the last 10,000 years, selection pushed the genetic predictor of cognitive performance up by roughly a full standard deviation — most of it between 4,000 and 2,000 years ago. After we finished recording, David sketched out on a whiteboard his new heretical model about who the Neanderthals really were. Luckily, I took out my iPhone and managed to record it. He thinks the standard story (that Neanderthals are some separate archaic lineage we interbred with a little) just doesn't fit the evidence. Instead, he proposes that Neanderthals are essentially genetically-swamped modern humans. A small population somewhere around the Caucasus invented Middle Stone Age technology roughly 300,000 years ago and expanded outward. The ones that moved into Europe interbred with local archaic humans, got genetically swamped, and became Neanderthals. The same expansion went into Africa, met much more diverged archaic Africans, and that mixture became us. This means Neanderthals and modern humans share the same cultural ancestry — the only difference is which archaic humans they mixed with afterward. David is a brilliant and rigorous scholar. It was a real delight to learn from him again. 0:00:00 – Ancient DNA suggests strong selection over last 10,000 years 0:16:24 – Natural selection intensified during the Bronze Age 0:35:40 – Why didn't evolution max out intelligence? 0:58:00 – Evolution is limited by time, not population size 1:09:40 – Why no farming before the Ice Age? 1:17:52 – The Neanderthal puzzle David can’t stop thinking about 1:54:40 – The methodology behind this breakthrough

David Reich is back. He and collaborator Ali Akbari just published a paper that overturns a long-standing consensus about human evolution — that natural selection has been dormant in our species since the agricultural revolution. By scaling ancient DNA sequencing and developing a new statistical method, they found that selection has actually sped up. Selection went especially bonkers during the Bronze Age (around 3,000 years ago). That's when gene frequencies for everything from immune function to body fat to intelligence were most in flux. Over the last 10,000 years, selection pushed the genetic predictor of cognitive performance up by roughly a full standard deviation — most of it between 4,000 and 2,000 years ago. After we finished recording, David sketched out on a whiteboard his new heretical model about who the Neanderthals really were. Luckily, I took out my iPhone and managed to record it. He thinks the standard story (that Neanderthals are some separate archaic lineage we interbred with a little) just doesn't fit the evidence. Instead, he proposes that Neanderthals are essentially genetically-swamped modern humans. A small population somewhere around the Caucasus invented Middle Stone Age technology roughly 300,000 years ago and expanded outward. The ones that moved into Europe interbred with local archaic humans, got genetically swamped, and became Neanderthals. The same expansion went into Africa, met much more diverged archaic Africans, and that mixture became us. This means Neanderthals and modern humans share the same cultural ancestry — the only difference is which archaic humans they mixed with afterward. David is a brilliant and rigorous scholar. It was a real delight to learn from him again. 0:00:00 – Ancient DNA suggests strong selection over last 10,000 years 0:16:24 – Natural selection intensified during the Bronze Age 0:35:40 – Why didn't evolution max out intelligence? 0:58:00 – Evolution is limited by time, not population size 1:09:40 – Why no farming before the Ice Age? 1:17:52 – The Neanderthal puzzle David can’t stop thinking about 1:54:40 – The methodology behind this breakthrough

Dwarkesh Patel

272,073 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tucker Carlson tells Piers Morgan: "The whole point of mass immigration is to humiliate and degrade the white population." "Who's pushing this? The population clearly doesn't want it. There's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide." "You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it." "I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries."

Sensitive content

Tucker Carlson tells Piers Morgan: "The whole point of mass immigration is to humiliate and degrade the white population." "Who's pushing this? The population clearly doesn't want it. There's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide." "You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it." "I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries."

Red Pill Dispenser

797,560 次观看 • 5 个月前

ELON: EARTH IS NOT OVERPOPULATED—IT’S UNDERPOPULATED “A lot of people believe that the Earth can't sustain this level of human population, which is utterly untrue. It may seem in a crowded city that there are a lot of people, but actually, if you look down on an airplane and you say, look down, am I over a person? When you're on an airplane, the answer is no 99.9% of the time. All of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. The cross sectional area of all humans, 8 billion humans, is small. So, we have this totally wrong idea that the Earth is overpopulated, when in fact it is underpopulated. We're starting to see pro-natalist politicians like Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, and hopefully more as time goes by. These have to translate into actual actions that change the birth rate or it doesn't matter. And so far, I've not seen any country making a meaningful dent in the birth rate. I would change the education system so that people are stopped being taught that we're overpopulated. A lot of it comes from this insane misanthropic book that Paul Ehrlich wrote, The Population Bomb. I hope he burns in hell that guy, seriously. The Earth can absolutely sustain its population. We could double or triple the population. There's a professor I was talking to at Oxford, his math says we could 10x the population without destroying the Amazon rainforest or anything terrible. I think we should expand the human population and increase the scope and scale of consciousness so we can better understand the nature of this universe, this wonderful universe and all the amazing things that exist. We need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the Earth is overpopulated.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 2024

ELON: EARTH IS NOT OVERPOPULATED—IT’S UNDERPOPULATED “A lot of people believe that the Earth can't sustain this level of human population, which is utterly untrue. It may seem in a crowded city that there are a lot of people, but actually, if you look down on an airplane and you say, look down, am I over a person? When you're on an airplane, the answer is no 99.9% of the time. All of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. The cross sectional area of all humans, 8 billion humans, is small. So, we have this totally wrong idea that the Earth is overpopulated, when in fact it is underpopulated. We're starting to see pro-natalist politicians like Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, and hopefully more as time goes by. These have to translate into actual actions that change the birth rate or it doesn't matter. And so far, I've not seen any country making a meaningful dent in the birth rate. I would change the education system so that people are stopped being taught that we're overpopulated. A lot of it comes from this insane misanthropic book that Paul Ehrlich wrote, The Population Bomb. I hope he burns in hell that guy, seriously. The Earth can absolutely sustain its population. We could double or triple the population. There's a professor I was talking to at Oxford, his math says we could 10x the population without destroying the Amazon rainforest or anything terrible. I think we should expand the human population and increase the scope and scale of consciousness so we can better understand the nature of this universe, this wonderful universe and all the amazing things that exist. We need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the Earth is overpopulated.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

146,487 次观看 • 8 个月前

ELON: EARTH IS NOT OVERPOPULATED - IT’S UNDERPOPULATED “A lot of people believe that the Earth can't sustain this level of human population, which is utterly untrue. It may seem in a crowded city that there are a lot of people, but actually, if you look down on an airplane and you say, look down, am I over a person? When you're on an airplane, the answer is no 99.9% of the time. All of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. The cross-sectional area of all humans, 8 billion humans, is small. So, we have this totally wrong idea that the Earth is overpopulated, when in fact it is underpopulated. We're starting to see pro-natalist politicians like Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, and hopefully more as time goes by. These have to translate into actual actions that change the birth rate or it doesn't matter. And so far, I've not seen any country making a meaningful dent in the birth rate. I would change the education system so that people are stopped being taught that we're overpopulated. A lot of it comes from this insane misanthropic book that Paul Ehrlich wrote, The Population Bomb. I hope he burns in hell that guy, seriously. The Earth can absolutely sustain its population. We could double or triple the population. There's a professor I was talking to at Oxford, his math says we could 10x the population without destroying the Amazon rainforest or anything terrible. I think we should expand the human population and increase the scope and scale of consciousness so we can better understand the nature of this universe, this wonderful universe and all the amazing things that exist. We need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the Earth is overpopulated.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 2024

ELON: EARTH IS NOT OVERPOPULATED - IT’S UNDERPOPULATED “A lot of people believe that the Earth can't sustain this level of human population, which is utterly untrue. It may seem in a crowded city that there are a lot of people, but actually, if you look down on an airplane and you say, look down, am I over a person? When you're on an airplane, the answer is no 99.9% of the time. All of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. The cross-sectional area of all humans, 8 billion humans, is small. So, we have this totally wrong idea that the Earth is overpopulated, when in fact it is underpopulated. We're starting to see pro-natalist politicians like Viktor Orbán, Giorgia Meloni, and hopefully more as time goes by. These have to translate into actual actions that change the birth rate or it doesn't matter. And so far, I've not seen any country making a meaningful dent in the birth rate. I would change the education system so that people are stopped being taught that we're overpopulated. A lot of it comes from this insane misanthropic book that Paul Ehrlich wrote, The Population Bomb. I hope he burns in hell that guy, seriously. The Earth can absolutely sustain its population. We could double or triple the population. There's a professor I was talking to at Oxford, his math says we could 10x the population without destroying the Amazon rainforest or anything terrible. I think we should expand the human population and increase the scope and scale of consciousness so we can better understand the nature of this universe, this wonderful universe and all the amazing things that exist. We need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the Earth is overpopulated.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 2024

Mario Nawfal

159,416 次观看 • 7 个月前

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

Dwarkesh Patel

31,861 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk: "America cannot win on the human front. China has 4x our population and higher work ethic" "It's not just that there's four times the population, but the amount of work that people put in is higher" "A pro sports team that's been winning for a very long time tends to get complacent and entitled. That's why they stop winning, because they don't work as hard anymore" "Frankly, America has been winning for so long that... that's my observation" "The US birth rate's been below replacement since roughly 1971" "We're close to more people domestically dying than being born" "We definitely can't win on the human front" "But if you start getting to hundreds of millions of units a year of humanoid robots, you're going to be the most competitive country by far" "we can't win with just humans, because China has four times our population" "but we might have a shot at the robot front"

Elon Musk: "America cannot win on the human front. China has 4x our population and higher work ethic" "It's not just that there's four times the population, but the amount of work that people put in is higher" "A pro sports team that's been winning for a very long time tends to get complacent and entitled. That's why they stop winning, because they don't work as hard anymore" "Frankly, America has been winning for so long that... that's my observation" "The US birth rate's been below replacement since roughly 1971" "We're close to more people domestically dying than being born" "We definitely can't win on the human front" "But if you start getting to hundreds of millions of units a year of humanoid robots, you're going to be the most competitive country by far" "we can't win with just humans, because China has four times our population" "but we might have a shot at the robot front"

Brad

477,210 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tucker Carlson: "The whole point is to humiliate and degrade the indigenous population of the British Isles, the white population. I mean, that's the whole point. And are they really going to do something about it? What would that be exactly? You'd really have to force a lot of people to go back to their countries of origin, millions of people, and you need to do it really soon." "And are they actually willing to do that? I don't know. But these are existential questions that we have been browbeat into ignoring for decades." "But the question is like, is Ireland Ireland? If it's majority non-Irish, oh, shut up. They're Irish. No, they're actually not Irish. Same with the UK, same with England, Scotland, Wales." "Like, it's all changing so fast. Nothing like this has ever happened in all of history, except when, say, the Mongols swept across the steppe and raped everybody. Like, that was true demographic change on this scale." "But even that wasn't as profound as what we're seeing in every white country around the world. I would say the West, but Australia and New Zealand also. So like, what is that? Now, my brain is not big enough to understand what that is. I think, I mean, I have a lot of theories about it, but I don't know if they're true. All I know is what the numbers are. And that's real." "And no one feels that he can say it. Everyone's like, oh, well, if that were happening in China or India or Malaysia or Senegal, it doesn't matter. You'd be like, what the hell is that? Like, the population is totally different." "Look at graduation. Pick, I don't know, King's College Law School and look at the graduation picture for the last 30 years. Who's in it? Just like, let your eyes tell you the truth for once." "Like, this is a total change in population. Is it better? Is it worse? Can't have that conversation. Who's pushing this? Does the population want it? The population clearly doesn't want it." "There's no polling that's meaningful on the subject. I mean, there's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide. You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it. What is this? I think it's the biggest and darkest thing that has happened in the last thousand years, for sure. And I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries. I mean, I think. Oh, shut up, white supremacist. In fact, I'm not a white supremacist. I'm just noticing what the hell's going on."

Tucker Carlson: "The whole point is to humiliate and degrade the indigenous population of the British Isles, the white population. I mean, that's the whole point. And are they really going to do something about it? What would that be exactly? You'd really have to force a lot of people to go back to their countries of origin, millions of people, and you need to do it really soon." "And are they actually willing to do that? I don't know. But these are existential questions that we have been browbeat into ignoring for decades." "But the question is like, is Ireland Ireland? If it's majority non-Irish, oh, shut up. They're Irish. No, they're actually not Irish. Same with the UK, same with England, Scotland, Wales." "Like, it's all changing so fast. Nothing like this has ever happened in all of history, except when, say, the Mongols swept across the steppe and raped everybody. Like, that was true demographic change on this scale." "But even that wasn't as profound as what we're seeing in every white country around the world. I would say the West, but Australia and New Zealand also. So like, what is that? Now, my brain is not big enough to understand what that is. I think, I mean, I have a lot of theories about it, but I don't know if they're true. All I know is what the numbers are. And that's real." "And no one feels that he can say it. Everyone's like, oh, well, if that were happening in China or India or Malaysia or Senegal, it doesn't matter. You'd be like, what the hell is that? Like, the population is totally different." "Look at graduation. Pick, I don't know, King's College Law School and look at the graduation picture for the last 30 years. Who's in it? Just like, let your eyes tell you the truth for once." "Like, this is a total change in population. Is it better? Is it worse? Can't have that conversation. Who's pushing this? Does the population want it? The population clearly doesn't want it." "There's no polling that's meaningful on the subject. I mean, there's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide. You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it. What is this? I think it's the biggest and darkest thing that has happened in the last thousand years, for sure. And I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries. I mean, I think. Oh, shut up, white supremacist. In fact, I'm not a white supremacist. I'm just noticing what the hell's going on."

Camus

875,757 次观看 • 10 个月前

Paul Ehrlich says in 2022 that the Earth’s population should be reduced to about 3.5 billion and "idiots think we are going to terraform Mars." “Humanely try and bring the population down to a size that we can sustain.” “If you want a maximum number of people to live, you have to have a sustainable population that stays within the limits of what the planet can support. “There are some idiots who think we are going to terraform Mars and move people there. They can’t do arithmetic because Mars is smaller than Earth.” “Even if you could somehow miraculously make it a wonderful place to go and move people there, it would fill up faster than Earth.”

Paul Ehrlich says in 2022 that the Earth’s population should be reduced to about 3.5 billion and "idiots think we are going to terraform Mars." “Humanely try and bring the population down to a size that we can sustain.” “If you want a maximum number of people to live, you have to have a sustainable population that stays within the limits of what the planet can support. “There are some idiots who think we are going to terraform Mars and move people there. They can’t do arithmetic because Mars is smaller than Earth.” “Even if you could somehow miraculously make it a wonderful place to go and move people there, it would fill up faster than Earth.”

KanekoaTheGreat

12,746 次观看 • 4 个月前

When a journalist asked a Muslim man how many children he had, he replied, "I have so many children that if I tell you the number, you'll be scared. Even Modi would be scared." He further said, "We will break all population records. We will dominate everywhere. Surpassing China in population is a matter of pride for us." These people are a burden on the country. Zero contribution to development - they are only increasing the population.

When a journalist asked a Muslim man how many children he had, he replied, "I have so many children that if I tell you the number, you'll be scared. Even Modi would be scared." He further said, "We will break all population records. We will dominate everywhere. Surpassing China in population is a matter of pride for us." These people are a burden on the country. Zero contribution to development - they are only increasing the population.

Saffron Chargers

34,004 次观看 • 5 个月前

Isn't it strange that it took 300,000 years for the human population to reach 1 billion, but only 200 years to reach 8 billion? The history they are telling you is a complete fabrication. We are living in a highly unstable environment that cyclically resets civilization, but also drives evolution. The book and series Three-Body Problem are inspired by our own forbidden history.

Isn't it strange that it took 300,000 years for the human population to reach 1 billion, but only 200 years to reach 8 billion? The history they are telling you is a complete fabrication. We are living in a highly unstable environment that cyclically resets civilization, but also drives evolution. The book and series Three-Body Problem are inspired by our own forbidden history.

Open Minded Approach

59,383 次观看 • 2 个月前

Nicole Shanahan warns of an “extinction” level risk if AI-developed mRNA vaccines are rushed into use. “What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use.” “It delivers an inconsistent result in individuals.” “In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being.” “AI is a computer system. Human health is not.” “There's so many that could have been shared in yesterday's conference that are really excellent uses of AI… I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event.”

Nicole Shanahan warns of an “extinction” level risk if AI-developed mRNA vaccines are rushed into use. “What we need for the mRNA platform right now is a moratorium. It's not ready for human use.” “It delivers an inconsistent result in individuals.” “In order for our population to grow, to be strong, to be fully able-bodied, and for our human economy to thrive, we do need a moratorium on the mRNA for the time being.” “AI is a computer system. Human health is not.” “There's so many that could have been shared in yesterday's conference that are really excellent uses of AI… I heard a few that were kind of out there and if deployed too quickly could lead to an extinction event.”

End Tribalism in Politics

572,290 次观看 • 1 年前

Speaking in 1994, arch-globalist David Rockefeller makes the case for halting the growth of the human population: "The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident." "Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth... the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened." "The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilising world population." This speech was made two years after the launch of UN Agenda 21.

Speaking in 1994, arch-globalist David Rockefeller makes the case for halting the growth of the human population: "The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident." "Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth... the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened." "The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilising world population." This speech was made two years after the launch of UN Agenda 21.

Wide Awake Media

58,464 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON MUSK: "It's important to appreciate that in most areas, China is very advanced in manufacturing. There's only a few areas where it is not. China is a manufacturing powerhouse. Maybe if you start getting to hundreds of millions of humanoid robots a year, I think you're going to be the most competitive country by far. We definitely can't win with just humans because China has four times our population. So we can't win on the human front. Our birth rate has been low for a long time. The US birth rate's been below replacement since roughly 1971. So we definitely can't win on the human front, but we might have a shot at the robot front."

ELON MUSK: "It's important to appreciate that in most areas, China is very advanced in manufacturing. There's only a few areas where it is not. China is a manufacturing powerhouse. Maybe if you start getting to hundreds of millions of humanoid robots a year, I think you're going to be the most competitive country by far. We definitely can't win with just humans because China has four times our population. So we can't win on the human front. Our birth rate has been low for a long time. The US birth rate's been below replacement since roughly 1971. So we definitely can't win on the human front, but we might have a shot at the robot front."

DogeDesigner

76,068 次观看 • 5 个月前