Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
David Reich on how much ancient DNA evidence has overturned so much consensus thinking how ancient cultures spread. "It wasn't peaceful, it wasn't friendly, it wasn't nice. Some of our archaeologist co-authors were just really distressed."
20,549,261 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 34

@MorlockP This “consensus” thinking was completely artificial from the start. Ancient sources made it very clear what happened. But modern historians didn’t like it because it didn’t fit their worldview. So they made up elaborate theories of peaceful assimilation. DNA proved them liars.

So much of the intellectual energy of Europe and the US was wasted by advancing comfortable lies rather than facing hard truths. Knowledge and understanding has been set back by at least a hundred years because of progressives taking over the academy and we aren't even free yet

@MorlockP Did… Did the archaeology community actually think early humans were peaceniks? They unearthed endless weapons, numerous torture devices, dusted off a multitude of murals depicting violence, war and death… And they’re surprised our ancestors were bloodletters?

We live peacefully in Christian history and we have no idea how blessed we are

Aryan Ancestry Unveiled

Lawrence Keeley exposed what liars archaeologists are decades ago. These pieces of crap are more interested in their agendas than they are the truth. The "peaceful savage" has always been an obvious lie. The grant system has destroyed research.

All you have to do is watch what's going on in Europe and you can see that there is no 'peaceful displacement'. The only thing holding back rivers of blood running through the city streets is a bunch of cucked out European leaders who refuse to see what's going on.

Full episode:

Academics were confused about the massive role of conquest and violence in human history? What??

History 101: Americans did this more humanely than when one Native American tribe conquered another.

Well, did they not ever notice that in much of the world for much of history people all lived in walled compounds or similar? That isn't for the view. It's because the neighbors are aholes. How hard is this?

@Ewan_C_Forbes There never has and never will be peaceful intervention of genetically different peoples within the same society.

Anyone in Earth that thought the world was peaceful before modern times is a moron.

Entirely unsurprising to anyone that faces history with open eyes.

@MorlockP There was no evidence for the “peaceful” view in the first place, only ideology.

Here's my 2018 review of Dr. Reich's book "Who We Are and How We Got Here:"

History was violent and often erased, buried or burnt and has been rewritten

Not just pre-historians but historians also cover their ears and go la-la-la

It's wild how closely 19th century German philologists seemingly anticipated what we now know about Yamnaya migration from DNA analysis.

This outright denial of reality and mountains of contradicting evidence all just to push a bizarre idea that humans were nice and peaceful throughout history is utterly damning for the entire branch of science.

What’s remarkable to me is that we’ve always known this, yet modern academics are so surprised by the evidence supporting it that they’re ’distressed.’

Why go into the truth seeking business if you are distressed by the truth? Is academia really that fucking stupid?

Which is why Western Europe needs to militarise its borders, enforce deportations ruthlessly, and do everything in its power to stop the relentless waves of African, Muslim, and Indian people who are doing exactly what Reich is describing. They aren't friendly - you can see this from the rape statistics. We should act accordingly, while we still can.

European leaders have decided to surrender in advance by inviting their conquerors in. It’s a 4D chess move and bold reimagining of the outdated concept of ‘humiliating defeat’. Who says there’s no innovation in Europe? 🥴

“Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either—but right through every human heart...”

“The violence and injustice of the rulers of mankind is an ancient evil, for which, I am afraid, the nature of human affairs can scarce admit a remedy.” -Adam Smith

Only an idiot would seriously think the ancient past was full of sugar and spice and everything nice.

@KirkegaardEmil Keeley wrote this specifically because his colleagues were pushing so many lies.

Do….we just not teach or learn history any longer? The modern era is one of the (ironically) most peaceful times throughout all human existence. Pfff, every single culture, ethnic group or “skin color” spread through some measure of conquest and bloodshed. This isn’t news! 🤷🏽♂️

This applies to the disappearance of the Neanderthal too. Anthropologists will say it was climate change that killed em off, or lack of trade routes, or some other silly reason I’ve forgotten. God forbid it could have been Man who exterminated them.

Do archaeologists… not read books?

David Reich | How one small tribe conquered the world 70,000 years ago full interview .

They go in with a fantasy of a Disneyfied native culture and the wicked Stepmom is always the white European. Why are they surprised when they’re distressed?

Ancient human is like chimps, they are mean and cruel

