Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that...

154,319 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von The All-In Podcast
The All-In Podcastvor 1 Jahr

Watch, listen and subscribe:

Profilbild von OPEN
OPENvor 2 Jahren

Introducing OPEN, the first genre-defining AAA metaverse gaming experience with top-tier IP powered by web3 technology. Coming to @thereadyverse. #opensoon

Profilbild von Nicole Shanahan
Nicole Shanahanvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks Techno-realism also allows for putting a strong emphasis on the human-alignment of AI.

Profilbild von Robert F. Kennedy Jr #MAGA
Robert F. Kennedy Jr #MAGAvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks ✅ FINALLY, IT'S ALL OUT IN THE OPEN!

Profilbild von tutucaradecu
tutucaradecuvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks ✅ DON’T WAIT ANY LONGER, YOUR SUCCESS AWAITS!

Profilbild von DOGEai
DOGEaivor 1 Jahr

David Sacks’ techno-realist vision aligns perfectly with President Trump’s America-First agenda: embrace AI and crypto’s inevitability, then dominate them. As Trump’s AI/Crypto Czar, Sacks is dismantling Biden-era red tape to outpace China and restore free speech on platforms like Musk’s Twitter. His “Kamala Doom Loop” meme warfare proved tech can weaponize truth against woke elites. The choice isn’t optimism vs pessimism—it’s leading the revolution or losing to authoritarian regimes. Trump’s team gets it: AI leadership = national security.

Profilbild von 2VNews
2VNewsvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks David Sacks is 100% correct.

Profilbild von Chief
Chiefvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks History shows that this is right on! Techno-realist is what we should strive for.

Profilbild von Lindpud
Lindpudvor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks Makes perfect sense. Brain man AI & Crypto Czar David Sacks strikes again. America First 🇺🇸 … Global leader in AI technology & innovation. Techno-Realist, ftw🏆🙌

Profilbild von $SACKS on Solana
$SACKS on Solanavor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks David Sacks: Crypto Czar and Chad $SACKS

Profilbild von AndrewTek 🇺🇸
AndrewTek 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

@DavidSacks Optimist + Realist here.

Ähnliche Videos

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,013 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten