Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that...

theallinpod's profile picture

The All-In Podcast

564,221 subscribers

154,319 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политикаФинансы
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля The All-In Podcast
The All-In Podcast1 год назад

Watch, listen and subscribe:

Фото профиля OPEN
OPEN2 лет назад

Introducing OPEN, the first genre-defining AAA metaverse gaming experience with top-tier IP powered by web3 technology. Coming to @thereadyverse. #opensoon

Фото профиля Nicole Shanahan
Nicole Shanahan1 год назад

@DavidSacks Techno-realism also allows for putting a strong emphasis on the human-alignment of AI.

Фото профиля Robert F. Kennedy Jr #MAGA
Robert F. Kennedy Jr #MAGA1 год назад

@DavidSacks ✅ FINALLY, IT'S ALL OUT IN THE OPEN!

Фото профиля tutucaradecu
tutucaradecu1 год назад

@DavidSacks ✅ DON’T WAIT ANY LONGER, YOUR SUCCESS AWAITS!

Фото профиля DOGEai
DOGEai1 год назад

David Sacks’ techno-realist vision aligns perfectly with President Trump’s America-First agenda: embrace AI and crypto’s inevitability, then dominate them. As Trump’s AI/Crypto Czar, Sacks is dismantling Biden-era red tape to outpace China and restore free speech on platforms like Musk’s Twitter. His “Kamala Doom Loop” meme warfare proved tech can weaponize truth against woke elites. The choice isn’t optimism vs pessimism—it’s leading the revolution or losing to authoritarian regimes. Trump’s team gets it: AI leadership = national security.

Фото профиля 2VNews
2VNews1 год назад

@DavidSacks David Sacks is 100% correct.

Фото профиля Chief
Chief1 год назад

@DavidSacks History shows that this is right on! Techno-realist is what we should strive for.

Фото профиля Lindpud
Lindpud1 год назад

@DavidSacks Makes perfect sense. Brain man AI & Crypto Czar David Sacks strikes again. America First 🇺🇸 … Global leader in AI technology & innovation. Techno-Realist, ftw🏆🙌

Фото профиля $SACKS on Solana
$SACKS on Solana1 год назад

@DavidSacks David Sacks: Crypto Czar and Chad $SACKS

Фото профиля AndrewTek 🇺🇸
AndrewTek 🇺🇸1 год назад

@DavidSacks Optimist + Realist here.

Похожие видео

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017
0:36

ELON: THERE WILL BE FEWER AND FEWER JOBS THAT A ROBOT CAN’T DO BETTER “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don't think we're going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. I want to be clear, these are not things that I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen. And if my assessment is correct, then we need to say what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of a universal basic income is going to be necessary.” Source: World Government Summit Dubai, February 2017

Mario Nawfal

105,055 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Elon Musk on Universal Basic Income as a solution to mass unemployment when AI and robotics take over "What to do about mass unemployment? This is going to be a massive social challenge. And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. That’s simply the case, and I want to be clear that these are not things I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen And if my assessment is correct, then we need to ask: what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of universal basic income is going to be necessary"
1:56

Elon Musk on Universal Basic Income as a solution to mass unemployment when AI and robotics take over "What to do about mass unemployment? This is going to be a massive social challenge. And I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. That’s simply the case, and I want to be clear that these are not things I wish would happen. These are simply things that I think probably will happen And if my assessment is correct, then we need to ask: what are we going to do about it? I think some kind of universal basic income is going to be necessary"

SMX 🇺🇸

42,857 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”
1:16

Elon Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”

Mars University

14,569 просмотров • 4 дней назад

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce
2:15

DAVID SACKS ON THE AI RACE: "The US is currently in an AI race, and our chief global competition is China, obviously. They're the only other country that has the talent, the resources, and the technology expertise to basically beat us in AI. And I think whoever wins this AI race, that's going to have tremendous ramifications for both our economy and our national security. Clearly, we want the US to be the winner, just like we were with the internet, and every other technology revolution before that […] We know that to win this AI race, we have to be the most innovative. You can't regulate your way just to beating your competitor. You have to out-innovate them. And we know that in the United States, the innovation comes from the private sector, not the government. So we have to do everything we can to help our companies win, to help them be innovative, and that means getting a lot of red tape out of the way… We have to have the most AI infrastructure in the US. It has to be the easiest place to build it. All of the new data centers that are going in, they require tremendous power, so getting ahead of the curve on energy, making sure we stand up all of this new infrastructure we're going to need to basically produce these AI factories… We want the US technology stack to dominate globally. We want to be the partner of choice for the whole world… I think everyone in Silicon Valley understands that the way that you win a technology race is to have the biggest ecosystem […] You just want everybody to be building on top of your technology stack, and that's what we want for the United States." David Sacks w/Marc Benioff Dreamforce

Ron Pragides 

231,781 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"To bring that trophy back to Pullman, it's going to be in the third floor of the CFC if anybody wants to come out and see it. I think we might retire this trophy, I think this is a Pac-12 trophy. I think that might stay in our place for a long time." - Jake Dickert
0:20

"To bring that trophy back to Pullman, it's going to be in the third floor of the CFC if anybody wants to come out and see it. I think we might retire this trophy, I think this is a Pac-12 trophy. I think that might stay in our place for a long time." - Jake Dickert

SWX Local Sports

150,104 просмотров • 1 год назад

Elon Musk on why universal basic income is coming and also points another massive challenge: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”
1:16

Elon Musk on why universal basic income is coming and also points another massive challenge: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice. I think it’s going to be necessary There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better These are not things that I wish would happen - these are simply things that I think probably will happen If my assessment is correct, then we need to say, ‘What are we going to do about it?’ Universal basic income is going to be necessary The much harder challenge is how do people then have meaning? A lot of people derive their meaning from their employment If you’re not needed, if there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you have meaning? Do you feel useless? That’s a much harder problem to deal with”

X Freeze

58,887 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”
1:27

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

56,915 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“I do not believe it is an exaggeration to say that we are at a defining moment. What we choose to do next is critical and requires us to stop and think strategically. More of the same is not going to be ok.” ARC CEO Philippa Stroud lays down the challenge we face in the West...it is time to rebuild
1:37

“I do not believe it is an exaggeration to say that we are at a defining moment. What we choose to do next is critical and requires us to stop and think strategically. More of the same is not going to be ok.” ARC CEO Philippa Stroud lays down the challenge we face in the West...it is time to rebuild

The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship

11,077 просмотров • 1 год назад

xQc shares his thoughts on the Nick Fuentes altercation "If there's a better way to do something u should do it better..do i think pushing somebody like that is warranted, not really..there's just a better way to do it..not trying to be a libt*rd, a hypocrite..trying to be consistent..i think this is in the wrong..I think this is also incorrect, awful" "These topics are a lot more complicated..there's documented cases of gangst*lking..not a good thing..u don't know what it's like to be on the opposite end of the spectrum"
2:17

xQc shares his thoughts on the Nick Fuentes altercation "If there's a better way to do something u should do it better..do i think pushing somebody like that is warranted, not really..there's just a better way to do it..not trying to be a libt*rd, a hypocrite..trying to be consistent..i think this is in the wrong..I think this is also incorrect, awful" "These topics are a lot more complicated..there's documented cases of gangst*lking..not a good thing..u don't know what it's like to be on the opposite end of the spectrum"

yeet

57,558 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."
2:50

David Sacks breaks down the true risk of AI David Sacks "It’s not that I think the AI is going to develop a mind of its own. I don’t think the technology is anywhere close to that. But I do think that it could be used by the government in a much more invasive and intrusive way, in the manner that the government was, the Deep State was already trying to get in bed with the social networks. There is a real risk that AI is used by future governments or the Deep State basically to surveil us, to censor us, and even potentially to brainwash us, because it is really good for that."

jay plemons

102,370 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”
1:31

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

574,026 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MacFarlane: These things would land more if the DOJ was not an extension of the WH, which it is. It is deeply politicized. It is sycophantic. But I also think this is going to beg the question, how much more are we going to hear about preemptive pardons? I think that that's going to echo more as the weeks go on.
1:56

MacFarlane: These things would land more if the DOJ was not an extension of the WH, which it is. It is deeply politicized. It is sycophantic. But I also think this is going to beg the question, how much more are we going to hear about preemptive pardons? I think that that's going to echo more as the weeks go on.

Acyn

31,511 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: There are grander things we should be considering than the pettiness of everyday life. “I'd say life on Mars is difficult, dangerous, so many people might die. It's just fundamentally, are we going to become a multiplanet species or not? Even if we're sure Earth would be fine forever, do you want to be here forever? I think we want to be a spacefaring civilization. It's not like let's escape to Mars. Do we have a spirit of adventure? Do we want to go out there and see the rest of the universe? Who do we want to find out what's out there? Maybe meet some alien civilizations? Do we want science fiction to not be fiction forever? And if so, we need to be a multiplanet species. That's the next step. And then we can go from there to being a multistellar species and get to other star systems. I disagree with the notion of rationalizing becoming a multiplanet species with advancements on Earth. It is good in and of itself. It is important that we do this because eventually there's something that will do us in. It might be in 100 years, it might be in a million years, but something will do us in. What it comes down to is do we want civilization to survive on Earth until eventually it is extinguished and all life is extinguished? Or do we want to get out there and understand the nature of reality. There are grander things that we should be considering than the pettiness of everyday life.” Jay Leno's Garage, September 21, 2022
1:08

Elon Musk: There are grander things we should be considering than the pettiness of everyday life. “I'd say life on Mars is difficult, dangerous, so many people might die. It's just fundamentally, are we going to become a multiplanet species or not? Even if we're sure Earth would be fine forever, do you want to be here forever? I think we want to be a spacefaring civilization. It's not like let's escape to Mars. Do we have a spirit of adventure? Do we want to go out there and see the rest of the universe? Who do we want to find out what's out there? Maybe meet some alien civilizations? Do we want science fiction to not be fiction forever? And if so, we need to be a multiplanet species. That's the next step. And then we can go from there to being a multistellar species and get to other star systems. I disagree with the notion of rationalizing becoming a multiplanet species with advancements on Earth. It is good in and of itself. It is important that we do this because eventually there's something that will do us in. It might be in 100 years, it might be in a million years, but something will do us in. What it comes down to is do we want civilization to survive on Earth until eventually it is extinguished and all life is extinguished? Or do we want to get out there and understand the nature of reality. There are grander things that we should be considering than the pettiness of everyday life.” Jay Leno's Garage, September 21, 2022

ELON CLIPS

37,946 просмотров • 1 год назад

ELON: HERE ARE TWO REASONS WHY LIFE SHOULD BECOME MULTIPLANETARY “One is the defensive reason, where I think we want the light of consciousness to not be extinguished if something were to happen to Earth. And you know, in the case of the dinosaurs, they only had to worry about meteors and super volcanoes and other things. But for us humans, we actually have the power to destroy ourselves with nuclear weapons or some sort of crazy bioterrorism thing. So there's some danger that is not zero that could cause the end of life on Earth as we know it. That's the defensive reason to protect the future of consciousness. Then the other big reason, I think, is that it's exciting and it's adventurous and it's inspiring. It makes you think positively about the future. There need to be reasons to be inspired, reasons that move your heart and say yes, the future is going to be great. And I think, humanity going to Mars, even if you don't yourself want to go to Mars—and most people don't, just watch it, it's a tough gig, frankly. I think it would just be incredibly inspiring to the world in the same way that the Apollo program was inspiring to the world. We need things that make us excited and inspired about the future. And that would be one of them.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Ron Baron, November 4, 2022
2:12

ELON: HERE ARE TWO REASONS WHY LIFE SHOULD BECOME MULTIPLANETARY “One is the defensive reason, where I think we want the light of consciousness to not be extinguished if something were to happen to Earth. And you know, in the case of the dinosaurs, they only had to worry about meteors and super volcanoes and other things. But for us humans, we actually have the power to destroy ourselves with nuclear weapons or some sort of crazy bioterrorism thing. So there's some danger that is not zero that could cause the end of life on Earth as we know it. That's the defensive reason to protect the future of consciousness. Then the other big reason, I think, is that it's exciting and it's adventurous and it's inspiring. It makes you think positively about the future. There need to be reasons to be inspired, reasons that move your heart and say yes, the future is going to be great. And I think, humanity going to Mars, even if you don't yourself want to go to Mars—and most people don't, just watch it, it's a tough gig, frankly. I think it would just be incredibly inspiring to the world in the same way that the Apollo program was inspiring to the world. We need things that make us excited and inspired about the future. And that would be one of them.” Source: Elon Musk, Interview with Ron Baron, November 4, 2022

Mario Nawfal

185,489 просмотров • 1 год назад

Dan Farah: "I think a sitting president has to step to the microphone and say definitively, humanity is not alone in the universe. We have recovered technology of non-human origin." Joe Rogan: "Well, if that is going to happen, I think Trump might be the only guy that’s willing to do something that crazy."
1:24

Dan Farah: "I think a sitting president has to step to the microphone and say definitively, humanity is not alone in the universe. We have recovered technology of non-human origin." Joe Rogan: "Well, if that is going to happen, I think Trump might be the only guy that’s willing to do something that crazy."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

68,672 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Whitney Webb "It sucks to find out that the mob runs the world... [so] do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to... get off your... slave plantation?... [because] we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't... climb out" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Peter McCormack (The Peter McCormack Show) posted to YouTube on September 4, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "It's not just about burning it down, it's about putting something better in its place. Of course. And so I think the solutions there, you know, some people are like, oh, Whitney, your work is so demoralizing. Well, I'm like, yeah, it sucks to find out that the mob runs the world, you know, but the question is, or do you just want to let them keep running it because it bums you out, or do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to build something else and get off your, you know, slave plantation? "And I am in the group of, I would like to build something else. I have three kids. I do not want them living in a world run by the mob. So what are you going to do about it? I mean, it starts locally, it starts with your community, because that's where we can actually affect change. Voting for left or right, blue or red. I mean, it's just this ping pong thing where nothing fundamental is changing. "And so to affect that change, we have to do it ourselves. And you think this would be a core American value? Individualism, individual responsibility. But a lot of people just don't care. And so, you know, that sucks. But I think those of us that do care need, to take steps to be as independent from the system as possible. Because every so often, this predator class, they do wealth transfers or they orchestrate and manufacture events and they make a big grab, not just for our money, but for our rights. And we're at the point where we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't climb ourself out. Can't climb out. "So what, what should we do before that happens? There is an important window of time to do something about it in our local community and for our families and our friends and our neighbors. And we have to do something because if we don't and that thing happens. Oh, well, I watched all these podcasts and learned about how corrupt everything is. But, you know, and I think they spend a lot of time trying to keep us distracted on all sorts of things and sucked into things that don't matter. So that we just don't give them the finger, basically. And that's what we really need to do."
2:12

Whitney Webb "It sucks to find out that the mob runs the world... [so] do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to... get off your... slave plantation?... [because] we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't... climb out" This clip of Webb (Whitney Webb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Peter McCormack (The Peter McCormack Show) posted to YouTube on September 4, 2025. -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "It's not just about burning it down, it's about putting something better in its place. Of course. And so I think the solutions there, you know, some people are like, oh, Whitney, your work is so demoralizing. Well, I'm like, yeah, it sucks to find out that the mob runs the world, you know, but the question is, or do you just want to let them keep running it because it bums you out, or do you want to say, screw you guys, we're going to build something else and get off your, you know, slave plantation? "And I am in the group of, I would like to build something else. I have three kids. I do not want them living in a world run by the mob. So what are you going to do about it? I mean, it starts locally, it starts with your community, because that's where we can actually affect change. Voting for left or right, blue or red. I mean, it's just this ping pong thing where nothing fundamental is changing. "And so to affect that change, we have to do it ourselves. And you think this would be a core American value? Individualism, individual responsibility. But a lot of people just don't care. And so, you know, that sucks. But I think those of us that do care need, to take steps to be as independent from the system as possible. Because every so often, this predator class, they do wealth transfers or they orchestrate and manufacture events and they make a big grab, not just for our money, but for our rights. And we're at the point where we can't really keep losing money and rights without being so deep in a hole that we can't climb ourself out. Can't climb out. "So what, what should we do before that happens? There is an important window of time to do something about it in our local community and for our families and our friends and our neighbors. And we have to do something because if we don't and that thing happens. Oh, well, I watched all these podcasts and learned about how corrupt everything is. But, you know, and I think they spend a lot of time trying to keep us distracted on all sorts of things and sucked into things that don't matter. So that we just don't give them the finger, basically. And that's what we really need to do."

Sense Receptor

46,951 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”
1:36

.Rep. Justin Jones: "“We still have Democrats were acting like this is early 2000 politics. That world of normalcy is gone. This is a war for the future of our democracy. And the South is the front line in that battle… I would say to the governors and to the lawmakers in those [blue] states that this is a moment to put our morals above our manners. What is moral is to act, not just for us, but for generations who are counting on us, what we do in this moment. I think we're going to be judged not by what we do, but by what we don't do.”

BTC Clips

114,028 просмотров • 1 месяц назад