Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

David Swensen took $1 billion and turned it into $16.7 billion using three ideas that fit on a napkin. He did not pick winning stocks. He did not time the market. He did not use a secret formula. He diversified, he rebalanced, and he never panicked. He ran Yale's...

andreysuperior's profile picture

Superior

13,865 subscribers

27,716 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

EğitimFinans
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

I told Howard Marks that I only invest in the index. He told me he did the research for one of his memos: - Yes, on average it has returned 10% a year for 100 years - But the annual return is almost never between 8% and 12% - "It kills it or it dies" - "The norm is not the average"
0:35

I told Howard Marks that I only invest in the index. He told me he did the research for one of his memos: - Yes, on average it has returned 10% a year for 100 years - But the annual return is almost never between 8% and 12% - "It kills it or it dies" - "The norm is not the average"

Sam Parr

122,533 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

One man turned $20 million into $14 billion in thirteen years. he retired at 46. then he walked into the National Press Club and explained the entire method to a room of journalists. for free. the fund industry has spent thirty years pretending nobody recorded it. his name is Peter Lynch. he ran Fidelity's Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990. 29% a year. every year. when he started, the fund had $20 million. when he left, it was the largest mutual fund on earth. over a million shareholders. then he quit, walked away from billions in fees, and never managed outside money again. the first thing he says is the one rule Wall Street will never teach you. if you cannot explain to a ten-year-old in two minutes why you own a stock, you should not own it. he says 80% of people who own stocks cannot do this. then he explains why the number has not changed in thirty years. he did not use algorithms. he did not use quant models. he found stocks at the mall. at the grocery store. in his own neighborhood. he made more money on Dunkin' Donuts than on any sophisticated trade. the most boring companies with the simplest products, bought by a man who actually used them. the part nobody repeats: he says individual investors have a structural advantage over every institution on Wall Street. the funds are forced to follow rules that you are not. when they panic-sell, you benefit. when they cannot hold a small position, you can. he said this to a room full of financial journalists. not one of them ran the story. your financial advisor charges 1% of everything you own every year to underperform a method a retired fund manager gave away in one hour. there are 5,000 mutual funds competing for your money. the man who beat all of them told you exactly how. thirty years ago. the lecture is 61 minutes. it has been free since 1994. the people charging you to invest are hoping you never find it.
1:00:51

One man turned $20 million into $14 billion in thirteen years. he retired at 46. then he walked into the National Press Club and explained the entire method to a room of journalists. for free. the fund industry has spent thirty years pretending nobody recorded it. his name is Peter Lynch. he ran Fidelity's Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990. 29% a year. every year. when he started, the fund had $20 million. when he left, it was the largest mutual fund on earth. over a million shareholders. then he quit, walked away from billions in fees, and never managed outside money again. the first thing he says is the one rule Wall Street will never teach you. if you cannot explain to a ten-year-old in two minutes why you own a stock, you should not own it. he says 80% of people who own stocks cannot do this. then he explains why the number has not changed in thirty years. he did not use algorithms. he did not use quant models. he found stocks at the mall. at the grocery store. in his own neighborhood. he made more money on Dunkin' Donuts than on any sophisticated trade. the most boring companies with the simplest products, bought by a man who actually used them. the part nobody repeats: he says individual investors have a structural advantage over every institution on Wall Street. the funds are forced to follow rules that you are not. when they panic-sell, you benefit. when they cannot hold a small position, you can. he said this to a room full of financial journalists. not one of them ran the story. your financial advisor charges 1% of everything you own every year to underperform a method a retired fund manager gave away in one hour. there are 5,000 mutual funds competing for your money. the man who beat all of them told you exactly how. thirty years ago. the lecture is 61 minutes. it has been free since 1994. the people charging you to invest are hoping you never find it.

Tigerflow

262,036 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A codebreaker made $31 billion. he returned 66% a year for thirty years. Buffett averaged 20%. Soros averaged 30%. nobody came close. he gave one lecture about it at MIT. Wall Street has spent forty years trying to reverse-engineer what he said. he didn't hire traders. not one MBA. not one analyst. he hired physicists, astronomers, and Cold War cryptographers. he ran the fund from a strip mall on Long Island. his name is Jim Simons. the Medallion Fund made more money than Goldman Sachs most years. he never explained how. the part nobody talks about: the same pattern recognition he used to crack Soviet codes for the NSA is what he used to crack financial markets. he said it in this lecture. nobody in finance picked it up. a quant at a multi-billion dollar fund told me they play this for every new hire on day one. not a textbook. not a model. a 45-minute talk from a man who beat Buffett, Soros, Dalio, and every hedge fund alive. $31 billion. one formula. zero finance people. Goldman, JPMorgan, Citadel, Bridgewater. he beat all of them. from a strip mall. the lecture is free. he died the following year. it is in the video.
44:52

A codebreaker made $31 billion. he returned 66% a year for thirty years. Buffett averaged 20%. Soros averaged 30%. nobody came close. he gave one lecture about it at MIT. Wall Street has spent forty years trying to reverse-engineer what he said. he didn't hire traders. not one MBA. not one analyst. he hired physicists, astronomers, and Cold War cryptographers. he ran the fund from a strip mall on Long Island. his name is Jim Simons. the Medallion Fund made more money than Goldman Sachs most years. he never explained how. the part nobody talks about: the same pattern recognition he used to crack Soviet codes for the NSA is what he used to crack financial markets. he said it in this lecture. nobody in finance picked it up. a quant at a multi-billion dollar fund told me they play this for every new hire on day one. not a textbook. not a model. a 45-minute talk from a man who beat Buffett, Soros, Dalio, and every hedge fund alive. $31 billion. one formula. zero finance people. Goldman, JPMorgan, Citadel, Bridgewater. he beat all of them. from a strip mall. the lecture is free. he died the following year. it is in the video.

Tigerflow

17,622 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.
12:36

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

2026.4.2 The government says the number is $1.3 billion. But its own expert admitted he did not trace funds. Instead, categories were defined in advance, accounts were chosen by the government, and only selected transactions were counted. When the inflows and outflows did not match, prosecutors did not reduce the number. They expanded categories, added more entities, and inserted vague “other inflows” to make the model work. That is not a measured fraud loss. It is a constructed narrative. #FreeMilesGuo
1:01

2026.4.2 The government says the number is $1.3 billion. But its own expert admitted he did not trace funds. Instead, categories were defined in advance, accounts were chosen by the government, and only selected transactions were counted. When the inflows and outflows did not match, prosecutors did not reduce the number. They expanded categories, added more entities, and inserted vague “other inflows” to make the model work. That is not a measured fraud loss. It is a constructed narrative. #FreeMilesGuo

NFSC Speaks

4,528,903 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?
0:23

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

Marlow

513,913 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The CEOs of GE Aerospace, Airbus, Moody's and Visa flew in to present to one fund manager's clients. He gave the entire method away in 45 minutes. for free. industry charging 2-and-20 to flip names every eleven months has spent twenty years making sure this interview stays buried. his name is Chris Hohn. TCI Fund Management. his average holding period is eight years. the average in the US is under one year. when investors ask him what is new, he says: do you need to change your wife every year. he only buys monopolies. airports nobody will ever rebuild. toll roads with 100-year contracts. aircraft engines that cannot go electric. if a business faces real competition, he will not touch it. most investors model one to three years of cash flow. he models 20 to 30. every one point of real pricing power on a 10% margin is super leveraged. most investors never run that math. they paid him a $10 million bonus early in his career. he gave it away immediately. he says he does not own anything. he is just a custodian. 45 minutes. one method. the fund that makes CEOs fly in instead of flying out.
44:30

The CEOs of GE Aerospace, Airbus, Moody's and Visa flew in to present to one fund manager's clients. He gave the entire method away in 45 minutes. for free. industry charging 2-and-20 to flip names every eleven months has spent twenty years making sure this interview stays buried. his name is Chris Hohn. TCI Fund Management. his average holding period is eight years. the average in the US is under one year. when investors ask him what is new, he says: do you need to change your wife every year. he only buys monopolies. airports nobody will ever rebuild. toll roads with 100-year contracts. aircraft engines that cannot go electric. if a business faces real competition, he will not touch it. most investors model one to three years of cash flow. he models 20 to 30. every one point of real pricing power on a 10% margin is super leveraged. most investors never run that math. they paid him a $10 million bonus early in his career. he gave it away immediately. he says he does not own anything. he is just a custodian. 45 minutes. one method. the fund that makes CEOs fly in instead of flying out.

Tigerflow

58,177 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.
15:13

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.

Furiokao

252,057 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

One investor went thirty years without a losing year. not Buffett. not Soros. not Simons. just him. six months ago he sat down and explained his entire method on camera. for free. the finance industry pretended it never happened. his name is Stanley Druckenmiller. he ran Duquesne Capital from 1981 to 2010. 30% a year. zero down years. in 1992 he bet ten billion dollars against the British pound and broke the Bank of England in a single afternoon. then he closed his fund, returned every dollar of outside capital, and walked away. the first thing he says in this interview is the one sentence nobody in finance wants to hear. contrarianism is overrated. he does not search for disagreement. he searches for the setup. the uncomfortable part is what he says about building a portfolio today. he does not start with stocks. he does not start with diversification. he starts with where disruption is moving fastest and places concentrated bets. the exact opposite of what every financial advisor charges you to do. Buffett lost years. Soros lost years. Simons lost years. he didn't. he gave the method away on camera six months ago. the finance industry is still pretending it didn't happen. the interview is free. the people charging you 2-and-20 to do worse are hoping you never find it. I've been finding these for weeks. your timeline hasn't. follow or keep missing them.
27:45

One investor went thirty years without a losing year. not Buffett. not Soros. not Simons. just him. six months ago he sat down and explained his entire method on camera. for free. the finance industry pretended it never happened. his name is Stanley Druckenmiller. he ran Duquesne Capital from 1981 to 2010. 30% a year. zero down years. in 1992 he bet ten billion dollars against the British pound and broke the Bank of England in a single afternoon. then he closed his fund, returned every dollar of outside capital, and walked away. the first thing he says in this interview is the one sentence nobody in finance wants to hear. contrarianism is overrated. he does not search for disagreement. he searches for the setup. the uncomfortable part is what he says about building a portfolio today. he does not start with stocks. he does not start with diversification. he starts with where disruption is moving fastest and places concentrated bets. the exact opposite of what every financial advisor charges you to do. Buffett lost years. Soros lost years. Simons lost years. he didn't. he gave the method away on camera six months ago. the finance industry is still pretending it didn't happen. the interview is free. the people charging you 2-and-20 to do worse are hoping you never find it. I've been finding these for weeks. your timeline hasn't. follow or keep missing them.

Tigerflow

31,237 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Ian Lee is not doing a rant. He is doing arithmetic. Canada ships about $400 billion a year to the United States. That sounds like a weapon until you put it against their economy. It is about 1.5 percent of U.S. GDP. One and a half fingers. They are a $32 trillion machine. China is a distant second. We are just over two. A small country does not win a trade war with a large one. We do not have the cash or the cushion. Retaliation lands here first. Plants. Distilleries. The till. Not a podium in Washington. The part Ottawa will not say is the part that should enrage you. Trump did not invent the dependency. He did not ban pipelines for a decade. He did not write the $200 billion in interprovincial barriers. He did not decide we would sell almost everything south and then lecture the only customer. We did that. He found the cracks and pushed. Carney ran as the adult who could close a deal. Seventeen months later the file is a slogan and a walk-away. Elbows up polls. Arithmetic does not. Lee’s fix is not another speech in Europe. Kill the barriers between provinces. Move resources at volume. Stop pretending 1.5 percent of their GDP is a chokehold. You cannot bring the largest economy on earth to its knees with a rounding error. You can only bring your own plants to a stop and call it principle. #cdnpoli
6:42

Ian Lee is not doing a rant. He is doing arithmetic. Canada ships about $400 billion a year to the United States. That sounds like a weapon until you put it against their economy. It is about 1.5 percent of U.S. GDP. One and a half fingers. They are a $32 trillion machine. China is a distant second. We are just over two. A small country does not win a trade war with a large one. We do not have the cash or the cushion. Retaliation lands here first. Plants. Distilleries. The till. Not a podium in Washington. The part Ottawa will not say is the part that should enrage you. Trump did not invent the dependency. He did not ban pipelines for a decade. He did not write the $200 billion in interprovincial barriers. He did not decide we would sell almost everything south and then lecture the only customer. We did that. He found the cracks and pushed. Carney ran as the adult who could close a deal. Seventeen months later the file is a slogan and a walk-away. Elbows up polls. Arithmetic does not. Lee’s fix is not another speech in Europe. Kill the barriers between provinces. Move resources at volume. Stop pretending 1.5 percent of their GDP is a chokehold. You cannot bring the largest economy on earth to its knees with a rounding error. You can only bring your own plants to a stop and call it principle. #cdnpoli

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

77,891 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Peter Obi’s first test as governor was not a big project. It was letterheaded paper. They brought a quote: ₦60,000. He did not stamp it. He did not “just approve.” He took the same request to another printer and confirmed the real price. That is the whole philosophy in one scene. Public money is not pocket money. The small leak is how the big theft begins. A man who will fight ₦60,000 on stationery will not casually sign billions for consumption. Nigeria is broke today because too many leaders never asked the second price. They signed the first invoice, added a cut, and called it governance.
0:57

Peter Obi’s first test as governor was not a big project. It was letterheaded paper. They brought a quote: ₦60,000. He did not stamp it. He did not “just approve.” He took the same request to another printer and confirmed the real price. That is the whole philosophy in one scene. Public money is not pocket money. The small leak is how the big theft begins. A man who will fight ₦60,000 on stationery will not casually sign billions for consumption. Nigeria is broke today because too many leaders never asked the second price. They signed the first invoice, added a cut, and called it governance.

Peter Obi Grassroots Commentary

24,145 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.
1:03:58

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

48,073 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Elon keeps the hours with Lil X that the companies do not get to vote on. He has said he only has him every other week and tries to use as much of that time as he can. He did not grow up with a stable father in the house. The rule he set for himself is the opposite. Stay. Do the ordinary thing. People can call him a bad father from outside the clip. The boy inside it is not being left. The headline can say what it wants. He is spending the week he actually has.
0:37

Elon keeps the hours with Lil X that the companies do not get to vote on. He has said he only has him every other week and tries to use as much of that time as he can. He did not grow up with a stable father in the house. The rule he set for himself is the opposite. Stay. Do the ordinary thing. People can call him a bad father from outside the clip. The boy inside it is not being left. The headline can say what it wants. He is spending the week he actually has.

Astro Greek

46,219 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,233 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Warren Buffett just poured $31 BILLION into a stock he swore off for decades. He refused to touch a single tech company for 60 years. Now he's admitting it was his biggest regret. Here is why he finally changed his mind: For decades, Buffett had one simple rule: Only buy businesses you understand, at a fair price. Tech never fit. It moved too fast and was too easy to lose money in. He watched Google go from startup to over $2 trillion and never bought in. He called it one of his biggest mistakes ever. Then something changed: In late 2025, Berkshire quietly started buying Alphabet shares. Alphabet is the company that owns Google, YouTube, and Google Cloud. By mid 2026, the stake had exploded. On June 1, Alphabet raised $80 billion to build AI data centers. Buffett put in $10 billion of it directly. Today Alphabet is one of Berkshire's five largest positions, worth about $31 billion. On July 15, Buffett went on live TV and admitted it was his idea, not his successor's. So why did the man who avoids tech finally break his own rule? > The numbers. In April, Alphabet reported earnings that stunned Wall Street: > Profit per share came in at $5.11 > Analysts expected $2.63 > Revenue hit $109.9 billion, up nearly 22% in a year. > Google Cloud grew 63%. > Its backlog of future cloud orders reached $460 billion. That is real money coming in the door. But here's the part people missed: Even Buffett admitted the business has a problem. Alphabet is spending up to $185 billion this year on AI. That spending cut its free cash flow by 47% in a single quarter. He bought anyway, because the profits were real, the price was fair, and the moat was wide. He waited over 20 years for the math to make sense. Then he moved with total conviction. Now compare that to how most people invest in AI. They chase whatever is going up. They buy on hype, headlines, and fear of missing out. They pile into names they do not understand. Then they panic the moment the story wobbles. Buffett did the opposite: - He ignored the noise for two decades - He waited for the fundamentals to line up, and - He only acted when the rules said yes That is the whole game. It runs on a system that waits for the setup, not emotion. Most people cannot do that on their own. They feel the fear and they act on it. The fix is to take the emotion out completely. That is exactly what Surmount was built for. Automated, rules-based strategies that buy on logic, not feelings. So when the next great setup arrives, you are already positioned.
0:29

Warren Buffett just poured $31 BILLION into a stock he swore off for decades. He refused to touch a single tech company for 60 years. Now he's admitting it was his biggest regret. Here is why he finally changed his mind: For decades, Buffett had one simple rule: Only buy businesses you understand, at a fair price. Tech never fit. It moved too fast and was too easy to lose money in. He watched Google go from startup to over $2 trillion and never bought in. He called it one of his biggest mistakes ever. Then something changed: In late 2025, Berkshire quietly started buying Alphabet shares. Alphabet is the company that owns Google, YouTube, and Google Cloud. By mid 2026, the stake had exploded. On June 1, Alphabet raised $80 billion to build AI data centers. Buffett put in $10 billion of it directly. Today Alphabet is one of Berkshire's five largest positions, worth about $31 billion. On July 15, Buffett went on live TV and admitted it was his idea, not his successor's. So why did the man who avoids tech finally break his own rule? > The numbers. In April, Alphabet reported earnings that stunned Wall Street: > Profit per share came in at $5.11 > Analysts expected $2.63 > Revenue hit $109.9 billion, up nearly 22% in a year. > Google Cloud grew 63%. > Its backlog of future cloud orders reached $460 billion. That is real money coming in the door. But here's the part people missed: Even Buffett admitted the business has a problem. Alphabet is spending up to $185 billion this year on AI. That spending cut its free cash flow by 47% in a single quarter. He bought anyway, because the profits were real, the price was fair, and the moat was wide. He waited over 20 years for the math to make sense. Then he moved with total conviction. Now compare that to how most people invest in AI. They chase whatever is going up. They buy on hype, headlines, and fear of missing out. They pile into names they do not understand. Then they panic the moment the story wobbles. Buffett did the opposite: - He ignored the noise for two decades - He waited for the fundamentals to line up, and - He only acted when the rules said yes That is the whole game. It runs on a system that waits for the setup, not emotion. Most people cannot do that on their own. They feel the fear and they act on it. The fix is to take the emotion out completely. That is exactly what Surmount was built for. Automated, rules-based strategies that buy on logic, not feelings. So when the next great setup arrives, you are already positioned.

Surmount

12,298 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be £1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.
0:28

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be £1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.

BanksyCat

87,806 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

He is not speaking in code. He is teaching his own children the doctrine out loud, with a World Central Kitchen box on the table, and the second half of the clip is the part the West still pretends not to hear. They are not asking for a state. They are not asking for a ceasefire so they can live. He says they are a people who love death, that their enemies love life, and that if they die they are martyrs welcomed in the next world while the rest of us are stuck with this one. That is not grief. That is the offer. Life is treated as the weaker position, and death is treated as the win. This is why every Western lecture about “root causes” and “dignity” keeps missing the room. You cannot negotiate a man out of an afterlife he has already chosen, and you cannot shame a culture that films itself saying the quiet part in front of a child. He said it himself. Believe him. Thank you and credit to Imshin for this video
1:26

He is not speaking in code. He is teaching his own children the doctrine out loud, with a World Central Kitchen box on the table, and the second half of the clip is the part the West still pretends not to hear. They are not asking for a state. They are not asking for a ceasefire so they can live. He says they are a people who love death, that their enemies love life, and that if they die they are martyrs welcomed in the next world while the rest of us are stuck with this one. That is not grief. That is the offer. Life is treated as the weaker position, and death is treated as the win. This is why every Western lecture about “root causes” and “dignity” keeps missing the room. You cannot negotiate a man out of an afterlife he has already chosen, and you cannot shame a culture that films itself saying the quiet part in front of a child. He said it himself. Believe him. Thank you and credit to Imshin for this video

Mor Edge Insight

22,183 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

in 2008 Ken Griffin lost 55% of his investors' money - eighteen years later the man on the other side of that trade was Leopold Aschenbrenner - down 67% in a single month this is the full document - what Citadel lost, what Griffin refused to hand back, and what it cost him to survive it "we were losing hundreds upon hundreds in capital a week - if not more" when investors asked for $1.2 billion back, he suspended redemptions and locked them in for ten months rather than sell into a frozen market the funds returned 62% the next year - and were still down 27% across the two they crossed back above the 2008 high-water mark in January 2012, and he collected no performance fees the entire time save & read the full document ↓
1:45

in 2008 Ken Griffin lost 55% of his investors' money - eighteen years later the man on the other side of that trade was Leopold Aschenbrenner - down 67% in a single month this is the full document - what Citadel lost, what Griffin refused to hand back, and what it cost him to survive it "we were losing hundreds upon hundreds in capital a week - if not more" when investors asked for $1.2 billion back, he suspended redemptions and locked them in for ten months rather than sell into a frozen market the funds returned 62% the next year - and were still down 27% across the two they crossed back above the 2008 high-water mark in January 2012, and he collected no performance fees the entire time save & read the full document ↓

Сarm1ne

208,777 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🇮🇷|Pezeshkian Said It as a Physician: Mojtaba Khamenei Is Healthy. The Rumors Are Dead. The President of Iran is a physician. He practiced medicine before he entered politics. He specialized in cardiology. He is not a spokesperson reading a script. He is a doctor giving a medical opinion. And he said: there are no health issues. No challenges. He spent seven-plus hours in a meeting with Mojtaba Khamenei. The Leader was healthy enough to withstand those hours. He was seated. He changed positions. He was fine. "Hear this from me as a physician and accept it: he has no issues." That is not a political statement. That is a medical assessment. From a doctor. From the President. About the Supreme Leader. The West has been circulating rumors. Claims that Mojtaba Khamenei is ill. Claims that he is incapacitated. Claims that there is a power vacuum in Tehran. Claims that the leadership is unstable. These rumors serve a purpose. They suggest that Iran is weak. They suggest that the Islamic Republic is on the verge of collapse. They suggest that the system is fracturing. They suggest that the US and Israel should wait, or push, or prepare for the moment when the leadership falters. The rumors are not new. They have been circulated about every Iranian leader. About Khomeini. About Khamenei. About every senior figure in the Islamic Republic. They are part of the psychological war. They are designed to create uncertainty. They are designed to weaken confidence. They are designed to prepare the ground for regime change. Pezeshkian shut them down. Not with a political statement. With a medical statement. He removed the ambiguity. He removed the speculation. He said: there is nothing to see here. The Leader is healthy. The system is stable. The rumors are lies. The Supreme Leader is not a ceremonial figure. He is the highest authority in the Islamic Republic. He is the Commander-in-Chief. He is the final arbiter on strategic decisions. If there were a health crisis, it would be a constitutional crisis. It would affect every level of the state. It would affect the war. It would affect the resistance. It would affect the region. Pezeshkian is saying: there is no crisis. There is no vacuum. There is no instability. The system is functioning. The leadership is intact. The ship is steady. And he is saying it as a doctor. That is the key. A political statement can be dismissed. A medical statement from a physician president cannot be dismissed as easily. He examined the man. He sat with him for seven hours. He observed him. He is not relying on secondhand information. He is giving a firsthand assessment. The statement is also a message to the Iranian people. It says: do not listen to the rumors. Do not panic. Do not spread uncertainty. The Leader is fine. The country is fine. The system is fine. It is a message to the armed forces. It says: your commander is healthy. Your chain of command is intact. Your orders will be issued. Your leadership is present. It is a message to the Resistance Axis. It says: the center is holding. The coordination is ongoing. The strategy is unchanged. The leadership is stable. And it is a message to the enemy. It says: your psychological war is failing. Your rumors are being exposed. Your attempts to create doubt are being neutralized. The Leader is healthy. The system is strong. Iran is not collapsing.
0:50

🇮🇷|Pezeshkian Said It as a Physician: Mojtaba Khamenei Is Healthy. The Rumors Are Dead. The President of Iran is a physician. He practiced medicine before he entered politics. He specialized in cardiology. He is not a spokesperson reading a script. He is a doctor giving a medical opinion. And he said: there are no health issues. No challenges. He spent seven-plus hours in a meeting with Mojtaba Khamenei. The Leader was healthy enough to withstand those hours. He was seated. He changed positions. He was fine. "Hear this from me as a physician and accept it: he has no issues." That is not a political statement. That is a medical assessment. From a doctor. From the President. About the Supreme Leader. The West has been circulating rumors. Claims that Mojtaba Khamenei is ill. Claims that he is incapacitated. Claims that there is a power vacuum in Tehran. Claims that the leadership is unstable. These rumors serve a purpose. They suggest that Iran is weak. They suggest that the Islamic Republic is on the verge of collapse. They suggest that the system is fracturing. They suggest that the US and Israel should wait, or push, or prepare for the moment when the leadership falters. The rumors are not new. They have been circulated about every Iranian leader. About Khomeini. About Khamenei. About every senior figure in the Islamic Republic. They are part of the psychological war. They are designed to create uncertainty. They are designed to weaken confidence. They are designed to prepare the ground for regime change. Pezeshkian shut them down. Not with a political statement. With a medical statement. He removed the ambiguity. He removed the speculation. He said: there is nothing to see here. The Leader is healthy. The system is stable. The rumors are lies. The Supreme Leader is not a ceremonial figure. He is the highest authority in the Islamic Republic. He is the Commander-in-Chief. He is the final arbiter on strategic decisions. If there were a health crisis, it would be a constitutional crisis. It would affect every level of the state. It would affect the war. It would affect the resistance. It would affect the region. Pezeshkian is saying: there is no crisis. There is no vacuum. There is no instability. The system is functioning. The leadership is intact. The ship is steady. And he is saying it as a doctor. That is the key. A political statement can be dismissed. A medical statement from a physician president cannot be dismissed as easily. He examined the man. He sat with him for seven hours. He observed him. He is not relying on secondhand information. He is giving a firsthand assessment. The statement is also a message to the Iranian people. It says: do not listen to the rumors. Do not panic. Do not spread uncertainty. The Leader is fine. The country is fine. The system is fine. It is a message to the armed forces. It says: your commander is healthy. Your chain of command is intact. Your orders will be issued. Your leadership is present. It is a message to the Resistance Axis. It says: the center is holding. The coordination is ongoing. The strategy is unchanged. The leadership is stable. And it is a message to the enemy. It says: your psychological war is failing. Your rumors are being exposed. Your attempts to create doubt are being neutralized. The Leader is healthy. The system is strong. Iran is not collapsing.

Aprajita Nafs Nefes 🦋 Ancient Believer

14,753 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

TRUST TRUMP, HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE IS DOING! Reporter… What does the oil deal do for us? Trump’s answer was not a consultant memo. Prices are coming down. He would not promise the drop lands before Election Day. He said people are smart enough to know why we went into Iran in the first place. That is the whole fight in one exchange. Short term, energy is the grocery bill, the commute, the factory, the farm. When oil is expensive, everything behind it gets expensive. Long term, a country that begs the world for energy is a country that gets pushed around. A country that produces it, moves it, and keeps the Strait from being a weapon writes its own prices. He is not running from the Iran decision. He is tying it to the pump. Do not let them separate the two. Cheap energy is not a talking point. It is whether working families get to keep more of what they earn.
0:43

TRUST TRUMP, HE KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT HE IS DOING! Reporter… What does the oil deal do for us? Trump’s answer was not a consultant memo. Prices are coming down. He would not promise the drop lands before Election Day. He said people are smart enough to know why we went into Iran in the first place. That is the whole fight in one exchange. Short term, energy is the grocery bill, the commute, the factory, the farm. When oil is expensive, everything behind it gets expensive. Long term, a country that begs the world for energy is a country that gets pushed around. A country that produces it, moves it, and keeps the Strait from being a weapon writes its own prices. He is not running from the Iran decision. He is tying it to the pump. Do not let them separate the two. Cheap energy is not a talking point. It is whether working families get to keep more of what they earn.

Gunther Eagleman™

53,391 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce