Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

DB Stay Square Drill Coaching Points A good stance looks uncomfortable. Pressure step foot push off Hips should stay square as long as possible Bill Brechin, Defensive Coordinator, Miami (OH) Bill Brechin #FootballDrills #GlazierClinics

50,324 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This home lunge superset isn't for the faint of heart. The burning heat in your legs will beg you to stop, but the strength and growth you'll reap make it all worth it. 4 sets of 12 forward lunges, then 12 Reverse right away. Build a lower body that stands the test of time: Lunge Form Cues Set-Up: Stand tall with feet hip-width apart, hands on hips or at your sides. Alignment: Keep your chest up and shoulders back. Step: Take a big step forward, lowering your hips until both knees are bent at 90 degrees. Brace: Engage your core and maintain balance as your front foot lands to stabilize the movement. Push: Drive through your front heel to return to the starting position. Breathing: Inhale as you lower into the lunge, exhale as you push back up. 5 Lunge mistakes and how to avoid them 1. Taking Too Small a Step - What Happens: A short step limits the range of motion, reducing muscle activation in the glutes and quads. - Fix: Step far enough forward to allow both knees to bend at 90 degrees. 2. Rising Onto the Front Toes - What Happens: Lifting the heel shifts balance and reduces engagement of the glutes and hamstrings. - Fix: Keep your front foot flat, pressing firmly through the heel. 3. Poor Hip Alignment - What Happens: Tilting or rotating the hips reduces balance and proper muscle engagement. - Fix: Keep your hips square and aligned with your torso throughout the movement. 4. Feet Too Narrow or Wide - What Happens: Misaligned foot placement reduces stability and increases the chance of losing balance. - Fix: Keep your feet hip-width apart to maintain balance and proper alignment during the lunge. 5. Not Engaging the Core - What Happens: A weak core reduces balance and stability, increasing the risk of wobbling. - Fix: Brace your core upon landing to absorb the impact and keep your torso steady and aligned. Reverse Lunge Form Cues Set-Up: Stand tall with feet hip-width apart, hands on hips or at your sides. Alignment: Keep your chest lifted, core engaged, and shoulders back. Step: Step one leg back, lowering your hips until both knees are bent at 90 degrees. Land: Land on the top of your back foot with the toes pointed to stretch the ankle and prevent assistance from the toes. Push: Drive through your front heel to return to the starting position. Breathing: Inhale as you lower into the lunge, exhale as you push back up. 5 Reverse Lunge Mistakes and how to avoid them: 1. Using the Toes for Support on the Back Foot - What Happens: Relying on the back toes reduces the stretch in the ankle and shifts focus away from the front leg. - Fix: Land on the top of your back foot with the toes pointed to stretch the ankle and isolate the front leg fully. 2. Leaning Forward - What Happens: Leaning forward places unnecessary strain on the lower back and reduces engagement of the glutes and quads. -Fix: Keep your chest up and shoulders back to maintain an upright posture.Letting the Front Knee 3. Collapse Inward - What Happens: Knee valgus increases stress on the knee joint and reduces stability. - Fix: Ensure the front knee tracks over the middle of your foot throughout the movement. 4. Letting the Front Knee Collapse Inward - What Happens: Knee valgus increases stress on the knee joint and reduces stability. - Fix: Ensure the front knee tracks over the middle of your foot throughout the movement. 5. Pushing Off the Back Foot - What Happens: Using the back foot to assist reduces the workload on the front leg. - Fix: Focus on driving through the heel of the front foot to return to the starting position.

Alex Bernier

14,524 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Ottawa is breaking Canada—and half of Westerners say maybe it's time we let them Let’s cut through the political spin and get right to the truth: Alberta and Saskatchewan didn’t break Canada. Ottawa did. And if this country comes apart at the seams, it won’t be because Western Canada walked away — it’ll be because the Laurentian elite shoved us toward the door. This week, the Angus Reid Institute dropped a bombshell, 50% of Albertans and Saskatchewanians now say they support holding a referendum on independence. In Alberta, 36% say they’d vote to leave; in Saskatchewan, it’s 34%. And while the hardcore “definitely leave” crowd sits at 19% in Alberta and 15% in Saskatchewan, that still represents hundreds of thousands of people ready to exit Confederation today. Let that sink in. That’s not fringe. That’s a movement — one Ottawa built with its own arrogance. Why is this happening? Because Ottawa refuses to listen. Refuses to change. Refuses to respect us. Instead, we get: • Bill C-69, the no-more-pipelines law, still on the books • A suffocating emissions cap that targets Alberta and Saskatchewan while letting global polluters off the hook • No national vision for an east-west pipeline, leaving our energy landlocked and our people unemployed And what does the poll show? That we’re not unmovable separatists — we’re desperate realists. According to Angus Reid: • 69% of Alberta “leave” voters and 61% in Saskatchewan say they’d vote to stay if Ottawa built a pipeline across the country • 62% in Alberta and 56% in Saskatchewan would stay if Bill C-69 were repealed • 61% of Alberta separatists and 54% of Saskatchewan ones say ending the emissions cap would convince them to vote "stay" Ottawa could put out this fire tomorrow, but they won’t. Why? Because they don’t see Western Canada as a partner. They see us as a piggy bank. We supply the resources, we pay the bills, and they punish us for it. And let’s talk about how this could quickly backfire. Angus Reid found that if British Columbia blocked access to tidewater, or Quebec vetoed future pipelines, support for separation would increase across the board — and by as much as 20% among soft “leave” voters. Even Indigenous protests wouldn’t hold back the separatist tide. Among the “definitely leave” group, a full majority said that major Indigenous resistance would actually make them more likely to support separation. Here’s one more number you won’t hear on CBC: 71% of Alberta separatists and 74% of Saskatchewan separatists would vote to stay if the federal Conservatives formed government. Translation? This isn’t so much a separatist revolution as it is a desperate cry for fairness. But if Ottawa keeps treating Alberta and Saskatchewan like provinces to be punished, taxed, and controlled — then maybe we’ve got no choice but to take our future into our own hands. Because how long can you stay in a relationship where you’re always paying, always blamed, and never heard? So, here’s the question no one in the Laurentian bubble is asking: Why are Westerners being asked to save a country that won’t take its foot off our heads while we drown? If Ottawa won’t change, maybe it’s time we did. REPORT by Sheila Gunn Reid:

Rebel News

88,953 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It’s a wrap! The Innovation Summit North America 2025, which was powered by Schneider Electric, was an incredible, thought-provoking experience. As I share in this video, one of the highlights of my time at the event in Las Vegas was touring the Innovation Park (three times, I think!). The Innovation Park was a large, 45,000-square-foot exhibit space where attendees could engage in hands-on demonstrations and explore cutting-edge technologies and solutions related to energy management, automation, AI, and sustainable infrastructure. Industry leaders and experts provided insights and practical strategies within this interactive environment. I am pretty sure I left the Park with 3 new certifications. However, two of my favorite themes that emerged from ISNA2025 weren’t necessarily technology-focused - - and they really reinforced what I already know to be true: - - The most successful companies in the world know that one of the best ways of optimizing innovation & resilience is by investing in their supply chain ecosystem. I think Schneider Electric illustrates that perfectly. As just one example, the company is working closely with thousands of its suppliers to explore new supply chain decarbonization approaches. Innovations & outcomes certainly come out of these investments, but more importantly, they build trust. And you can move mountains with trust. - - Digital transformation starts with the powerful human factor. And there are tremendous opportunities available, especially to those who are willing to: Learn, Apply, & Volunteer. Those amongst us who are willing to learn and apply something new every day, as well as volunteer for new projects & initiatives: the sky is the limit. As Tom Wilk with Plant Services mentioned to me, the theme of this golden age of supply chain tech should be the lyrics from a John Fogerty song: “Oh, put me in, coach! I'm ready to play today.” Stay tuned for upcoming interviews, details & perspectives via Supply Chain Now in the weeks ahead. We’ve got a lot of good stuff coming up, including my sit-down with Mourad Tamoud, CSCO at Schneider Electric, where, amongst many things, I get his proven perspective on how to build supply chains that perform under pressure. Mourad’s response would make David Bowie & Freddie Mercury proud!

Scott W. Luton

109,698 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Most people are still arguing about Israel. They missed the actual move. Vincent Oshana, two days ago: “In the span of two months, we choked off China’s discounted oil flow from Venezuela and now Iran.” Stop. Read it again. China runs on discounted oil. Take it away — their global influence machine slows down. Russia was getting Iranian drones for Ukraine — cheap, effective, endless. That pipeline is now cut. Iran funded terrorism, proxies, and its own regime through energy exports. The money is drying up. Three adversaries. Three pressure points. Sixty days. “Take your Israel time out for a second… take a step back and look at the board strategically.” This isn’t a Middle East story dressed up as foreign policy. It’s an energy war. A weapons war. A cash war. Running at the same time. Cut Venezuela → China’s leverage weakens. Cut Iran → Russia’s drone supply collapses AND Iran’s funding evaporates. One move. Two wounds. Simultaneously. “A lot of people are so stuck on just one thing, they can’t get out of this freaking cloud.” The cloud is the point. Keep the public focused on one square while three players get strangled on the rest of the board. “You can talk the talk… but Donald Trump is walking the walk.” Call it what you want. But coordinated pressure on oil, weapons, and cash — hitting China, Russia, and Iran inside the same 60-day window — is not an accident. That’s a strategy. Does it work long-term, or does squeezing three fronts at once leave you exposed everywhere? Zoom out before you answer. 🌍

Jake

120,986 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Marjorie Taylor Greene warns that the Genius Act is an "Orwellian" bill with "a back door open to a central bank digital currency" She says Trump "yelled" at her to vote yes on it. "It's so 1984 to think... government could flip a switch & turn off our ability to buy & sell" Shannon Joy Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "And a lot of people have not paid enough attention to this bill. The Genius Act was the whole crypto bill. There were the— There was Genius and there was Clarity. These are the two bills that were the entire crypto system totally getting basically federally approved, regulated, and made into law. "Well, I had a big problem with the Genius Act. As a matter of fact, there was a core group of us, conservatives that had a problem with it, because in the language of the bill, it basically very vaguely had a back door open to a central bank digital currency, which I'm 1000% against. "Most Americans don't want a central bank digital currency. We want control of our money. We should want control of your money. And, it's very Orwellian. It's so 1984 to think that our government could flip a switch and turn off our, our ability to buy and sell. "So I got called to the principal's office on this one. First, first we had to go to Johnson's office. And then we had a bunch of late-night meetings. They love late-night meetings because they loved it for you to be tired and worn out. And they love to pressure you and talk your ear off until you give in. That never worked— But it never worked for me. I was like, I don't give a fuck. I'll stay up all night long. Whatever you want to do. I'm a no. Just no. "So when they couldn't move me there, there was a group of us, I think there were 10 or 11 of us that— And we got called to the principal's office. We had to go to the White House. And, and it's like, oh, hey, hey, welcome in. You know, everybody's all chummy with me because I know every single one of them because I spent years with them campaigning all over the country. "Then we got brought in and they, they nicely put up all the chairs, like right in front of the Resolute Desk, right in front of it. And, well, I had no problem sitting in a chair in front of the President. I know the president. I was friends with the president. I helped him get elected. So naturally, I plop right down in a chair right in front of President Trump's desk. And so everybody files in, and then the President comes in and we do all the hellos and the niceties and yay. And all this stuff. And then we proceed to get yelled at. And it was mostly me that got yelled at the entire time over the Genius Act."

Sense Receptor

30,842 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BTC just confirmed the bearish divergence I have been waiting for, and for me that changes the whole map. With BTC now joining the TOTALES warning, I am no longer looking at this as a normal pullback. I think the market is setting up for a much deeper move over the next two months, and that is why I am treating any short term bounce as noise unless price can reclaim key levels with real strength. ETH is starting to crack in the same way. It has not printed the same daily divergence as BTC yet, but the structure is weakening, RSI broke support, and price is losing the fast line. Stablecoin dominance keeps pressing higher, TOTALES has already rolled over, and that combination still points to broad market weakness instead of a healthy reset. TradFi is not helping the bulls either. DXY looks ready for another push higher, USDJPY is back in the danger zone, and if Japan is forced into another intervention cycle the Nikkei, U.S. equities, and crypto could all get hit together again. At the same time, WTI looks overextended after filling its gap, while gold and silver are still chopping without giving me a strong risk-on signal. For today’s picks, I am still leaning toward bearish setups over heroic longs. XRP, QNT, ICP, NEAR, TRUMP, DCR, RENDER, ATOM, CHZ, and MORPHO all still look vulnerable if this broader risk-off move keeps building. A few names like DOGE, SKY, and some smaller caps can still bounce, but for me the bigger message today is simple: the warning signs are stacking up, and I would rather stay patient and defensive than fight the trend. 00:00 BTC confirms the bearish divergence 03:03 ETH weakness and stablecoin dominance 05:25 TOTALES breakdown and market-wide risk 06:54 DXY, USDJPY, and Japan intervention risk 13:41 WTI, gold, and silver check-in 20:12 Altcoin picks and short-side setups

Aaron Dishner

19,541 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Simon Sinek offers a counterintuitive take: The moment you step in and fix the problem, you stop being a leader: You got promoted because you were the best at the job. And that's precisely what makes leadership so difficult. The same instinct that made you great at the work, seeing the problem, knowing the answer, fixing it fast, becomes a liability the moment you move into a leadership role. Simon is direct about this: "Then you're not leading. You're just doing the work. You just have the leadership position." The people who now report to you may not be as good as you. They'll move slower. They'll miss things you would have caught immediately. And in those moments, every instinct will tell you to step in. But that instinct is exactly what you have to resist. "You can't just come in and tell them how you would do it. You have to push them to solve the problems the way that they would, just like someone did for you once before." Someone once gave you the space to figure it out. That patience is what shaped you. Now it's your turn to offer the same to others. Simon points to Chanel as a company that has built this principle into its culture. Newly hired senior leaders are not allowed to speak in meetings for their first three months. "You don't know anything about our company. And you'll learn by listening." Chanel trusts that their leaders will be around for the long term, so 90 days of silence is a small price to pay for someone who truly understands the business before they start shaping it. That's institutionalised patience. And it's almost unheard of. Most organisations reward speed, decisiveness, and output. So the pressure to swoop in and fix things feels justified, even virtuous. But Simon draws a hard line between having a leadership position and actually leading. One is a title. The other is a practice. And that practice demands something most high performers find deeply uncomfortable. Watching someone struggle toward an answer you already have, and choosing to let them find it themselves. That restraint is the real work of leadership.

Big Brain Business

283,174 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten