Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
🇺🇸🇮🇷 Deep ideological divides inside the U.S government are driving a wildly schizophrenic strategy in the Middle East. Quincy Institute EVP Trita Parsi points out that while official strategy documents advocate stepping back from regional quagmires, active military blockades prove the exact opposite is happening. He warns that clashes... show more
39,366 просмотров • 21 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 2

PYX Crypto 🐍21 дней назад
Strategy doc says "step back from the region," the Navy says "hold my blockade." It's less a foreign policy than two roommates fighting over the thermostat with aircraft carriers. Which faction do you think actually wins, the memo or the ships?

Principal⭐️21 дней назад
The biggest concern is strategic inconsistency: military pressure can make diplomacy harder, while diplomacy may be needed to prevent further escalation. The tension inside Washington’s approach is worth watching closely.
Похожие видео
1:01
Sensitive content
🇺🇸🇮🇷 A much larger war is now MORE likely than a quick de-escalation. Trita Parsi, Quincy Institute EVP and Middle East analyst, delivers one of the most sober assessments you'll hear. What looked like a performative strike phase could easily slip out of control, because the difference between a pressure tactic and a catastrophe is razor thin right now. The strikes started as theater, designed to signal rather than destroy. Parsi's warning is that theater has a habit of becoming real, and the odds have already flipped in the wrong direction. Trita Parsi
Mario Nawfal
66,456 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад
