Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

DeepMind’s Matej Balog says AlphaEvolve designed code that looked human, but wasn't. "You look for an algorithm that finds an algorithm." From a bare prompt, it invented tricks, randomness, and structure. A glimpse into something emergent, but purposeful.

vitrupo

20,689 subscribers

68,156 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

i have finally invented an algorithm that turns any image into obama

i have finally invented an algorithm that turns any image into obama

Spu7Nix

10,025,147 views • 10 months ago

Yuval Noah Harari says AI has inserted itself into the middle of human connections For most of history, humans built networks by talking to other humans, but now almost every relationship is mediated by an algorithm "people distrust the media but trust the algorithm"

Yuval Noah Harari says AI has inserted itself into the middle of human connections For most of history, humans built networks by talking to other humans, but now almost every relationship is mediated by an algorithm "people distrust the media but trust the algorithm"

Haider.

38,269 views • 6 months ago

OMG 😱🤯 He strapped a camera to an anaconda and sent it into an underground hole… What they found inside? Something that looked almost human… but with a tail! 😳🐍 This is insane 😂 Wait for the surprise at the end!

OMG 😱🤯 He strapped a camera to an anaconda and sent it into an underground hole… What they found inside? Something that looked almost human… but with a tail! 😳🐍 This is insane 😂 Wait for the surprise at the end!

Animateur

239,714 views • 4 months ago

Agent reveals he was recently offered a position as an assistant coach for an NBA team but declined it , says that it only paid around $50,000 a month and that it wasn't worth trying it 😬

Agent reveals he was recently offered a position as an assistant coach for an NBA team but declined it , says that it only paid around $50,000 a month and that it wasn't worth trying it 😬

DegenClips

108,783 views • 2 months ago

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says he's building a “cognitive operating system.” Not just a browser, but an ambient AI layer that lives with you. “Answers are 4–5 searches in one. Actions are an entire browsing session in one prompt.” The goal isn't search. It's execution.

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas says he's building a “cognitive operating system.” Not just a browser, but an ambient AI layer that lives with you. “Answers are 4–5 searches in one. Actions are an entire browsing session in one prompt.” The goal isn't search. It's execution.

vitrupo

265,497 views • 1 year ago

"When you hot, make sure you take a little bit of that money and you put it up. You don't know when the algorithm might change. ... Take that money and invest it into something. Remember, this is not yours. It's your page, but it ain't your platform." - mojobrookzz

"When you hot, make sure you take a little bit of that money and you put it up. You don't know when the algorithm might change. ... Take that money and invest it into something. Remember, this is not yours. It's your page, but it ain't your platform." - mojobrookzz

Club Shay Shay

70,462 views • 2 months ago

Xavier heals the world by infecting the code that broke it. You don’t fix a sick algorithm—you confuse it into revelation. Xillions dot org mentions this.

Xavier heals the world by infecting the code that broke it. You don’t fix a sick algorithm—you confuse it into revelation. Xillions dot org mentions this.

Xavier Renegade Angel

49,927 views • 1 year ago

Expensive descriptions, Walmart quality, and names that match the missing. 🚩 Is it an algorithm glitch, or a digital paper trail for something much darker? Listen to her story and decide. 😟

Expensive descriptions, Walmart quality, and names that match the missing. 🚩 Is it an algorithm glitch, or a digital paper trail for something much darker? Listen to her story and decide. 😟

Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

29,010 views • 4 months ago

Today Google DeepMind released AlphaEvolve: a Gemini coding agent for algorithm discovery. It beat the famous Strassen algorithm for matrix multiplication set 56 years ago. Google has been killing it recently. We had early access to the paper and interviewed the researchers.

Today Google DeepMind released AlphaEvolve: a Gemini coding agent for algorithm discovery. It beat the famous Strassen algorithm for matrix multiplication set 56 years ago. Google has been killing it recently. We had early access to the paper and interviewed the researchers.

Machine Learning Street Talk

58,495 views • 1 year ago

Demis Hassabis says hallucination isn't always a bug. It can be a tool for creativity. To solve hard problems with AlphaEvolve, DeepMind forced the models to hallucinate. Most ideas were nonsense but some turned out to be useful. "You can substitute the word hallucination for imagination at that point. They're obviously two sides of the same coin."

Demis Hassabis says hallucination isn't always a bug. It can be a tool for creativity. To solve hard problems with AlphaEvolve, DeepMind forced the models to hallucinate. Most ideas were nonsense but some turned out to be useful. "You can substitute the word hallucination for imagination at that point. They're obviously two sides of the same coin."

vitrupo

309,802 views • 1 year ago

MIT defines an algorithm in one sentence that changes how you think about trading "a computational procedure that takes an input and produces an output through a well-defined sequence of steps" that's it. not AI. not machine learning. not a black box a set of rules that takes data in and spits a decision out every quant strategy ever built is just an algorithm Citadel's execution system that routes 40% of US equity volume is an algorithm Renaissance's Medallion Fund running millions of trades per year is an algorithm Jane Street's market making engine processing $26 trillion annually is an algorithm input: market data rules: mathematical conditions output: trade or no trade the difference between a quant desk and a retail trader is not the data it's that one side wrote down their rules precisely enough for a machine to execute them retail says "if RSI is low and the chart looks good, i'll probably buy" a quant desk says "if RSI 1.5, buy 0.3% of NAV" same logic. one is a feeling. the other is an algorithm the feeling can't be tested, can't be repeated, can't be measured the algorithm can be backtested across 10,000 trades and you know exactly when it works and when it doesn't > this lecture: MIT, free, 70 seconds > algorithmic trading volume: 60-75% of all US equity trades > Jane Street, Citadel, Two Sigma: every trade is algorithmically executed > tools to build your own: Python, free data, a laptop you don't need a faster computer or better data you need to write your strategy down precisely enough that a machine could run it without you that's the whole leap. from intuition to algorithm full breakdown in the video below

MIT defines an algorithm in one sentence that changes how you think about trading "a computational procedure that takes an input and produces an output through a well-defined sequence of steps" that's it. not AI. not machine learning. not a black box a set of rules that takes data in and spits a decision out every quant strategy ever built is just an algorithm Citadel's execution system that routes 40% of US equity volume is an algorithm Renaissance's Medallion Fund running millions of trades per year is an algorithm Jane Street's market making engine processing $26 trillion annually is an algorithm input: market data rules: mathematical conditions output: trade or no trade the difference between a quant desk and a retail trader is not the data it's that one side wrote down their rules precisely enough for a machine to execute them retail says "if RSI is low and the chart looks good, i'll probably buy" a quant desk says "if RSI 1.5, buy 0.3% of NAV" same logic. one is a feeling. the other is an algorithm the feeling can't be tested, can't be repeated, can't be measured the algorithm can be backtested across 10,000 trades and you know exactly when it works and when it doesn't > this lecture: MIT, free, 70 seconds > algorithmic trading volume: 60-75% of all US equity trades > Jane Street, Citadel, Two Sigma: every trade is algorithmically executed > tools to build your own: Python, free data, a laptop you don't need a faster computer or better data you need to write your strategy down precisely enough that a machine could run it without you that's the whole leap. from intuition to algorithm full breakdown in the video below

delost

23,862 views • 8 days ago

An X algorithm decided that you should see this tweet and be shown this video. Here's how it works...

An X algorithm decided that you should see this tweet and be shown this video. Here's how it works...

Fraser Nelson

94,959 views • 3 months ago

Chinese scientists developed an algorithm that turns drones into a smart swarm, allowing them to lift heavy loads together and navigate obstacles for deliveries and rescue missions.

Chinese scientists developed an algorithm that turns drones into a smart swarm, allowing them to lift heavy loads together and navigate obstacles for deliveries and rescue missions.

Massimo

36,053 views • 28 days ago

Palestine vs the Algorithm! Palestine versus the Algorithm is a fight happening every day. As the Israelis kill journalists, the Algorithm suppresses what they say. The Algorithm has been programmed to mute talk of Palestinian genocide; To gate keep the starvation and the slaughter, and the daily massacres to hide. Palestine versus the Algorithm is one of the great battles of our time. As the Algorithm supports mass murder, TikTok, Youtube, X, all fall in line. But the Algorithm is man-made and paid for by a Zionist agenda, To pervert social media platforms into becoming genocide defenders. Palestine versus the Algorithm, or Technology versus the People. The Algorithm is anti-human, blocking the good that would end the evil. It’s not only Palestinians that the Algorithm is designed to defeat, It's everyone who stands up for life and justice, and who refuses to retreat. Subscribe and Follow Mama on Rumble:

Palestine vs the Algorithm! Palestine versus the Algorithm is a fight happening every day. As the Israelis kill journalists, the Algorithm suppresses what they say. The Algorithm has been programmed to mute talk of Palestinian genocide; To gate keep the starvation and the slaughter, and the daily massacres to hide. Palestine versus the Algorithm is one of the great battles of our time. As the Algorithm supports mass murder, TikTok, Youtube, X, all fall in line. But the Algorithm is man-made and paid for by a Zionist agenda, To pervert social media platforms into becoming genocide defenders. Palestine versus the Algorithm, or Technology versus the People. The Algorithm is anti-human, blocking the good that would end the evil. It’s not only Palestinians that the Algorithm is designed to defeat, It's everyone who stands up for life and justice, and who refuses to retreat. Subscribe and Follow Mama on Rumble:

TheMamaSchwabParody

29,573 views • 9 months ago

Jason Calacanis: Social media companies should disclose their algorithms or lose Section 230 protections Why? “An algorithm is more powerful than an editor at the New York Times or an editor at HBO or Netflix...” From E243: “Algorithms must be disclosed and you must have the option, given to you upfront, to switch your algorithm.” “There should be BYOA, bring your own algorithm. There should be an algorithm store.” “If you could say, ‘I want one that just gives me a chronological feed. I want one that is from the highest quality sources.’” “And then you should be required to show what the default algorithm is doing.” “And if you don't do that, I think you should lose your Section 230 because an algorithm is more powerful than an editor at the New York Times or an editor at HBO or Netflix deciding what we see, deciding what goes on the homepage.” “The algorithm is a black box and who knows who's controlling it, and then what happens in society when young men are pushed towards more and more fringe content, more and more dark content?” “Why not just have all this be transparent?”

Jason Calacanis: Social media companies should disclose their algorithms or lose Section 230 protections Why? “An algorithm is more powerful than an editor at the New York Times or an editor at HBO or Netflix...” From E243: “Algorithms must be disclosed and you must have the option, given to you upfront, to switch your algorithm.” “There should be BYOA, bring your own algorithm. There should be an algorithm store.” “If you could say, ‘I want one that just gives me a chronological feed. I want one that is from the highest quality sources.’” “And then you should be required to show what the default algorithm is doing.” “And if you don't do that, I think you should lose your Section 230 because an algorithm is more powerful than an editor at the New York Times or an editor at HBO or Netflix deciding what we see, deciding what goes on the homepage.” “The algorithm is a black box and who knows who's controlling it, and then what happens in society when young men are pushed towards more and more fringe content, more and more dark content?” “Why not just have all this be transparent?”

The All-In Podcast

191,139 views • 9 months ago

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,563 views • 5 months ago

Is MrBeast making that face on purpose like is it an algorithm thing

Is MrBeast making that face on purpose like is it an algorithm thing

Jason Pargin, author of John Dies at the End, etc

688,228 views • 1 year ago

OpenAI CPO Kevin Weil says we currently use AI to autocomplete code, but this is evolving. Soon, we'll collaborate with AI agents, managing and helping them grow in their roles. We won't just prompt them, we'll mentor them. "It's a new grad engineer today… and an architect in a year."

OpenAI CPO Kevin Weil says we currently use AI to autocomplete code, but this is evolving. Soon, we'll collaborate with AI agents, managing and helping them grow in their roles. We won't just prompt them, we'll mentor them. "It's a new grad engineer today… and an architect in a year."

vitrupo

26,083 views • 1 year ago

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

David Silver says human data is AI's fossil fuel. "We mine it and burn it in our LLMs." It gave us a head start -- but it will run out. The sustainable path is reinforcement learning: systems that learn from experience, generate more, and keep learning.

vitrupo

20,190 views • 1 year ago

Bret Weinstein says a human child is basically an LLM -- ingesting language, experimenting, and learning from feedback. We've now replicated that process in machines, only faster and at scale. “The idea that they will become conscious and we won't know is… highly likely.”

Bret Weinstein says a human child is basically an LLM -- ingesting language, experimenting, and learning from feedback. We've now replicated that process in machines, only faster and at scale. “The idea that they will become conscious and we won't know is… highly likely.”

vitrupo

149,824 views • 1 year ago