Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

deepseek made this. it did a better job than gpt 5.6 sol

yacineMTB's profile picture

kache

359,905 subscribers

53,809 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I'm ngl, it turned out WAY better than I thought. Here are 3 examples using the UI skill GPT 5.6 Sol made
0:59

I'm ngl, it turned out WAY better than I thought. Here are 3 examples using the UI skill GPT 5.6 Sol made

Leon Lin

63,782 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Same job for both agents, sourcing from 200 posts across Reddit and X. Codex with gpt 5.6 sol took 13m43s. Yet Deepseek v4 flash took 5m19s. Don't forget gpt 5.6 sol is $30 per million out, while the flash is $0.28. No pressure. Just math. OpenAI Developers Good job DeepSeek. you just kill the game
0:25

Same job for both agents, sourcing from 200 posts across Reddit and X. Codex with gpt 5.6 sol took 13m43s. Yet Deepseek v4 flash took 5m19s. Don't forget gpt 5.6 sol is $30 per million out, while the flash is $0.28. No pressure. Just math. OpenAI Developers Good job DeepSeek. you just kill the game

ego

77,084 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I had Codex Desktop and GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra take a go at building my Raccoon Heist game and it did an even better job than Claude Fable 5 did! Here's "Moonlight & Mayhem", now with a team of raccoons raiding a museum for the Golden Sardine
0:57

I had Codex Desktop and GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra take a go at building my Raccoon Heist game and it did an even better job than Claude Fable 5 did! Here's "Moonlight & Mayhem", now with a team of raccoons raiding a museum for the Golden Sardine

Simon Willison

37,860 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"
0:40

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,254 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with
0:38

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with

Dilum Sanjaya

108,368 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.
0:57

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

Riley Brown

123,642 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.
0:46

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Cerebras

1,290,274 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6-Sol one-shotted this saas animation. Motion designers are officially out of a job as of today. It ran for almost 2 hours, completely autonomously, to get the job done.
0:26

GPT-5.6-Sol one-shotted this saas animation. Motion designers are officially out of a job as of today. It ran for almost 2 hours, completely autonomously, to get the job done.

Kid Pak

226,275 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!
21:19

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!

me

277,237 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed
6:04

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

Wesley

78,394 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

GPT-5.6-Sol one-shotted this voxel-based Manhattan. Just look at the precision... it's insane. It ran for almost a week, completely autonomously, to get the job done.
0:38

GPT-5.6-Sol one-shotted this voxel-based Manhattan. Just look at the precision... it's insane. It ran for almost a week, completely autonomously, to get the job done.

Matt Shumer

1,055,425 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra: "Take this image and turn it into a game. Be creative." 30 mins, one shot
0:27

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra: "Take this image and turn it into a game. Be creative." 30 mins, one shot

Peter Gostev

139,139 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!
21:22

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Viktor Oddy

1,154,394 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.
3:06

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.

Nate Herk

286,716 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Codex users: here's an amazing way to take advantage of the efficiency and capability of GPT-5.6 Luna Max. It's called 'sol-advisor'. 1. GPT-5.6 Sol High as orchestrator 2. GPT-5.6 Luna Max as implementer for routine tasks 3. GPT-5.6 Terra Max as implementer for complex tasks 4. Fresh GPT-5.6 Sol instance as reviewer A free and open-source plugin for Codex. Installation instructions below 👇 I dare you to install it, and tell me if you hit your weekly usage limits using 'sol-advisor'. I doubt you can.
0:21

Codex users: here's an amazing way to take advantage of the efficiency and capability of GPT-5.6 Luna Max. It's called 'sol-advisor'. 1. GPT-5.6 Sol High as orchestrator 2. GPT-5.6 Luna Max as implementer for routine tasks 3. GPT-5.6 Terra Max as implementer for complex tasks 4. Fresh GPT-5.6 Sol instance as reviewer A free and open-source plugin for Codex. Installation instructions below 👇 I dare you to install it, and tell me if you hit your weekly usage limits using 'sol-advisor'. I doubt you can.

Dan McAteer

693,179 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Huge respect for GPT-5.6 Sol, but this is on another level.
0:25

Huge respect for GPT-5.6 Sol, but this is on another level.

define

13,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters
0:30

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Command Code

22,860 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

i was reading through Modal's glossary to better understand how GPUs work. but what better way to learn than a visualization? so I had gpt 5.6 sol build an H100 in three.js based off the glossary. play around with it at
0:21

i was reading through Modal's glossary to better understand how GPUs work. but what better way to learn than a visualization? so I had gpt 5.6 sol build an H100 in three.js based off the glossary. play around with it at

Kyle Jeong

38,039 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲
1:15

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

130,582 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten