正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra: "Take this image and turn it into a game. Be creative." 30 mins, one shot

Peter Gostev

22,845 subscribers

139,139 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

gpt 5.6 sol just one-shot my whole launch video. this is insane.

gpt 5.6 sol just one-shot my whole launch video. this is insane.

Shengkun

17,128 次观看 • 15 天前

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 次观看 • 14 天前

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra is so good at maths that it created Minecraft clone in Lean (yes that Lean)

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra is so good at maths that it created Minecraft clone in Lean (yes that Lean)

Peter Gostev

137,960 次观看 • 12 天前

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

127,195 次观看 • 14 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: write a python code that visualizes how a traffic light works in a one way street with cars entering at random rate.

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: write a python code that visualizes how a traffic light works in a one way street with cars entering at random rate.

Diego | AI 🚀 - e/acc

91,568 次观看 • 15 天前

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules

raz

54,158 次观看 • 14 天前

“gpt-image-2 bridges the gap between text and visual planning.” OpenArt built Smart Shot on gpt-image-2 to help creators turn a short story idea into characters, worlds, shots, and camera movement.

“gpt-image-2 bridges the gap between text and visual planning.” OpenArt built Smart Shot on gpt-image-2 to help creators turn a short story idea into characters, worlds, shots, and camera movement.

OpenAI Developers

64,843 次观看 • 3 个月前

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

254,141 次观看 • 7 天前

Another WTF moment. Using Codex as a fully custom game engine With the newly discovered and *insane* img2threejs skill 1) GPT imageGen a 3D item you want 2) ask GPT 5.6 Sol to use img2threejs 3) my harness brings it into the game automatically Just watch how good this is

Another WTF moment. Using Codex as a fully custom game engine With the newly discovered and insane img2threejs skill 1) GPT imageGen a 3D item you want 2) ask GPT 5.6 Sol to use img2threejs 3) my harness brings it into the game automatically Just watch how good this is

Nicolas Zullo

198,992 次观看 • 1 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra lost to GPT-5.5 on physics at 3× the cost! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics demos Prompts: - A monster truck backflipping onto a parked car - A stunt car jumping six buses into a brick wall - A train derailing off a broken bridge into the water Outputs: GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra: 32.9K tokens, $0.33 Opus 4.8: 9.2K tokens, $0.24 GPT-5.5: 12.4K tokens, $0.11 Grok 4.5: 7.0K tokens, $0.08 Sol Ultra draws just like GPT-5.5, only with more detail and it shows clearest on the bus jump where the two look almost identical. In the other tests Sol Ultra came out worse than its predecessor and the physics really got weaker. We think GPT-5.5 took the truck flip and the train outright. With Sol Ultra you basically get GPT-5.5 with weaker physics and a nicer picture for 3x the price. Newborn Grok 4.5 failed two of the three tests and only came good on the train

atomic.chat

896,119 次观看 • 15 天前

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!

me

268,810 次观看 • 7 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

196,910 次观看 • 14 天前

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.

Nate Herk

281,883 次观看 • 15 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol just one-shotted a full Minecraft clone in 90 minutes. Not iterated on for weeks — one shot, 90 minutes, done. We went from "AI can write a snake game" to "AI can rebuild a billion-dollar sandbox genre".

GPT-5.6 Sol just one-shotted a full Minecraft clone in 90 minutes. Not iterated on for weeks — one shot, 90 minutes, done. We went from "AI can write a snake game" to "AI can rebuild a billion-dollar sandbox genre".

0xMarioNawfal

81,472 次观看 • 19 天前

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

Givros

10,440 次观看 • 10 天前

Studios sell this as pre-production Smart Shot puts it on screen before the video even starts OpenArt’s Smart Shot combines GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 to turn a single sentence into a full Shot Plan, then uses that locked creative direction to render the final cinematic sequence. That’s why the production document should lead, and the video should land as proof Here’s how it works:

Studios sell this as pre-production Smart Shot puts it on screen before the video even starts OpenArt’s Smart Shot combines GPT Image 2 and Seedance 2.0 to turn a single sentence into a full Shot Plan, then uses that locked creative direction to render the final cinematic sequence. That’s why the production document should lead, and the video should land as proof Here’s how it works:

Amira Zairi

27,580 次观看 • 2 个月前

I asked GPT-5.6 sol (Ultra) to build a Google Earth clone. 3D terrain, satellite imagery, cities, landmarks, live weather, day/night cycles, cinematic tours, and global search. Cost: 30M+ tokens. Worth it.

I asked GPT-5.6 sol (Ultra) to build a Google Earth clone. 3D terrain, satellite imagery, cities, landmarks, live weather, day/night cycles, cinematic tours, and global search. Cost: 30M+ tokens. Worth it.

Pankaj Kumar

212,565 次观看 • 15 天前

GPT 5.6 Sol + Higgsfield MCP = 3D cartoon studio. 1. GPT 5.6 Sol writes the story 2. Seedream 5.0 Pro generates character sheets and locations 3. Seedream 5.0 Pro draws the storyboard 4. Seedance 2.0 animates it all Watch how it works:

GPT 5.6 Sol + Higgsfield MCP = 3D cartoon studio. 1. GPT 5.6 Sol writes the story 2. Seedream 5.0 Pro generates character sheets and locations 3. Seedream 5.0 Pro draws the storyboard 4. Seedance 2.0 animates it all Watch how it works:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

57,138 次观看 • 8 天前

GPT 5.6 Sol is so good web design it actually broke our evals 🥲 took creative liberties like a supapro web designer that took us off guard. in a few prompts, it was able to remix a slurped brand from an URL and Sol lit up 🌞❤️‍🔥

brryant

65,335 次观看 • 15 天前

Woah.. Pika just launched Pika agents 🤯 It completely automates workflows and takes them to a whole other level by incorporating GPT Image, Seedance…and skills. Watch me teach my agent a full creative ads skill and get it done in one shot.

Woah.. Pika just launched Pika agents 🤯 It completely automates workflows and takes them to a whole other level by incorporating GPT Image, Seedance…and skills. Watch me teach my agent a full creative ads skill and get it done in one shot.

Alvaro Cintas

17,735 次观看 • 2 个月前