Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Devs are leaking their Polymarket bots While everyone else is asking how to build one and earn passively People who actually cracked it are doing the opposite They’re dumping the edge before it disappears and print money on Polymarket ‘moondev’ built one of the fastest bots out there using...

gavelsvtw's profile picture

gavelsv.patron

4,141 subscribers

65,697 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it
1:54

Polymarket front run bot Spent the last month building the backend for this bot which essentially acts the same way that high frequency trading bots work in the stock market It waits for a market buy order to come through where there is thin liquidity in the order book meaning their market buy will push the price up of a YES/NO contract meaning that if my bot buys the contracts first then I can sell them at the high price to the market buy order before their orders have gone through Prediction markets are still early enough to find opportunities like this, just like how the early days of stock trading similar bots to this were invented It is essentially an arbitrage strategy, will make the bot public and free to a few people tomorrow so turn on notifications so you don’t miss it

Ethan

71,550 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This trader found a LOOPHOLE in weather markets He constantly turns $5 or $10 into THOUSANDS With +25,000% PnL... And yes, he keeps 78% Win Rate after 2,000+ trades He's buying 0.01% events and wins almost every time Here's how he does it exactly: You might think he's just lucky, but that's WRONG. He literally wins 8/10 predictions making over 100x. The real answer was shared by me MONTHS ago. This trader is probably the owner of the best weather prediction bot. He integrated public forecast APIs with Polymarket. So now his bot is tracking mispriced weather markets 24/7. Whenever there's a 1% chance of a weather event that should realistically be 50%+, he knows about it first. There are multiple public forecasts that are not used by Polymarket traders. And that's the edge. Those who use them know about temperature shifts minutes (sometimes even hours) before Polymarket is pricing them. I told it multiple times already, but most people are too lazy to try it. This guy isn't. His profile: [ Leaving a full copy trading guide quoted below. Probably one of the best wallets worth following.
0:58

This trader found a LOOPHOLE in weather markets He constantly turns $5 or $10 into THOUSANDS With +25,000% PnL... And yes, he keeps 78% Win Rate after 2,000+ trades He's buying 0.01% events and wins almost every time Here's how he does it exactly: You might think he's just lucky, but that's WRONG. He literally wins 8/10 predictions making over 100x. The real answer was shared by me MONTHS ago. This trader is probably the owner of the best weather prediction bot. He integrated public forecast APIs with Polymarket. So now his bot is tracking mispriced weather markets 24/7. Whenever there's a 1% chance of a weather event that should realistically be 50%+, he knows about it first. There are multiple public forecasts that are not used by Polymarket traders. And that's the edge. Those who use them know about temperature shifts minutes (sometimes even hours) before Polymarket is pricing them. I told it multiple times already, but most people are too lazy to try it. This guy isn't. His profile: [ Leaving a full copy trading guide quoted below. Probably one of the best wallets worth following.

Dexter's Lab

41,376 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Polymarket vs Sportsbooks: Why Betting Apps are Toast On E248, Chamath and Friedberg discussed why prediction markets like Polymarket are killing traditional sportsbooks. Friedberg: “I think gambling generally, as we call it, should be decriminalized.” “And I don't like this state-by-state set up with gambling.” “I think we should have a federal regulatory body.” “This is not going away. People love to bet on stuff. This is part of sports, this is part of the culture.” Chamath: “ Look at Polymarket.” “Polymarket raised at, whatever it was, $1-2B at $9B. Then the next weekend they announced sports betting and now they're raising money 30 days later at, allegedly, $12-15B.” “And you can see, by the way, the way that DraftKings and FanDuel stock have reacted to this, those companies are toast.” Friedberg: “ The Polymarket model is the best model because it creates a market.” “And so as information flows in, that market will dynamically adjust and everyone will get a more fair price.” “Polymarket actually has the news before the news does.” “And this is one of the most powerful outputs of Polymarket, is they're actually getting a read on what's going on in the world before the media recognizes it, before the public recognizes it.” “When you put money up, it actually turns out that when people have incentives, that market will find the truth.”
1:04

Polymarket vs Sportsbooks: Why Betting Apps are Toast On E248, Chamath and Friedberg discussed why prediction markets like Polymarket are killing traditional sportsbooks. Friedberg: “I think gambling generally, as we call it, should be decriminalized.” “And I don't like this state-by-state set up with gambling.” “I think we should have a federal regulatory body.” “This is not going away. People love to bet on stuff. This is part of sports, this is part of the culture.” Chamath: “ Look at Polymarket.” “Polymarket raised at, whatever it was, $1-2B at $9B. Then the next weekend they announced sports betting and now they're raising money 30 days later at, allegedly, $12-15B.” “And you can see, by the way, the way that DraftKings and FanDuel stock have reacted to this, those companies are toast.” Friedberg: “ The Polymarket model is the best model because it creates a market.” “And so as information flows in, that market will dynamically adjust and everyone will get a more fair price.” “Polymarket actually has the news before the news does.” “And this is one of the most powerful outputs of Polymarket, is they're actually getting a read on what's going on in the world before the media recognizes it, before the public recognizes it.” “When you put money up, it actually turns out that when people have incentives, that market will find the truth.”

The All-In Podcast

347,566 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Polymarket bots don’t need millions anymore to print money Someone came up with Polymarket bot for low balance traders He was flying under the radar, bot I found him I was digging through top bot and ran into something unusual A bot that isn’t loud, isn’t big, and isn’t flex volume “SilverKestrel” - only 84 profile views, no one see him That alone tells you it was doing a good job staying invisible - first trade was on Dec 30 - deposited just $600 Since then, it’s already pulled in about $1,200 in profit That’s 200%+ profit on balance At that pace, flipping $600 to $60k isn’t crazy at all What makes this bot interesting is what it *isn’t* - It’s not a whale - It doesn’t swing size - It runs around $800 in position value No spam trades. No huge volume. Just clean execution THE SETUP IS SIMPLE - fastest bot atm - 15 min Crypto markets - BTC and ETH only Most importantly - hiding in plain sight Bitcoin markets are flooded with bots Everyone watches the big wallets and high PnL accounts A small bot doesn’t draw attention there. That’s how it stays silent Polymarket bots don’t all need millions anymore to make huge profits With the right speed and market choice, even a low-balance setup can quietly compound Feels like the start of a new era Something tells me that now you can use bots with just $1000 on balance and make huge profits wallet:
0:33

Polymarket bots don’t need millions anymore to print money Someone came up with Polymarket bot for low balance traders He was flying under the radar, bot I found him I was digging through top bot and ran into something unusual A bot that isn’t loud, isn’t big, and isn’t flex volume “SilverKestrel” - only 84 profile views, no one see him That alone tells you it was doing a good job staying invisible - first trade was on Dec 30 - deposited just $600 Since then, it’s already pulled in about $1,200 in profit That’s 200%+ profit on balance At that pace, flipping $600 to $60k isn’t crazy at all What makes this bot interesting is what it *isn’t* - It’s not a whale - It doesn’t swing size - It runs around $800 in position value No spam trades. No huge volume. Just clean execution THE SETUP IS SIMPLE - fastest bot atm - 15 min Crypto markets - BTC and ETH only Most importantly - hiding in plain sight Bitcoin markets are flooded with bots Everyone watches the big wallets and high PnL accounts A small bot doesn’t draw attention there. That’s how it stays silent Polymarket bots don’t all need millions anymore to make huge profits With the right speed and market choice, even a low-balance setup can quietly compound Feels like the start of a new era Something tells me that now you can use bots with just $1000 on balance and make huge profits wallet:

gavelsv.patron

98,643 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The bots that were robbing you on 5-minute markets just got taxed out For months you were trading against code that saw the ending first It watched the Chainlink feed directly Knew the resolution 2-15 seconds before the screen updated Front-ran every click you made Then Polymarket changed one thing A dynamic fee that scales with how fast and mechanical your trade is The bot's whole game was speed Now speed costs money The free lunch is gone What's left is the part you can actually win A $800 Bitcoin drop still panics the Up contract to 12¢ Except now nobody's beating you to it with a faster server The next five minutes are readable again The edge stopped belonging to whoever had the fastest machine It belongs to whoever reads the move Did the bots scare you off these markets - or did you never get to find out?
3:57

The bots that were robbing you on 5-minute markets just got taxed out For months you were trading against code that saw the ending first It watched the Chainlink feed directly Knew the resolution 2-15 seconds before the screen updated Front-ran every click you made Then Polymarket changed one thing A dynamic fee that scales with how fast and mechanical your trade is The bot's whole game was speed Now speed costs money The free lunch is gone What's left is the part you can actually win A $800 Bitcoin drop still panics the Up contract to 12¢ Except now nobody's beating you to it with a faster server The next five minutes are readable again The edge stopped belonging to whoever had the fastest machine It belongs to whoever reads the move Did the bots scare you off these markets - or did you never get to find out?

Gorynich☄️

52,341 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Prediction markets are trending and people say it might get much bigger than the memecoin meta In this video - I tried to break down how do they actually work and is the hype really worth it? Don't miss out on this
3:01

Prediction markets are trending and people say it might get much bigger than the memecoin meta In this video - I tried to break down how do they actually work and is the hype really worth it? Don't miss out on this

Sakshi

13,241 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

In 2026, 90% of all Polymarket profits will be taken by Python scripts.. And this is not a prediction. It’s already happening. So if you think political pundits and sports gurus are making profits in these areas, let me be the bearer of bad news. Studies have revealed that merely “16% of users are profitable.” More importantly, “most of these users are not human.” How bots are exactly taking your money: Speed. One bot made $313 into $438K in a month. It’s a simple trick: the bot would look at the btc price a few seconds before the price update on Polymarket by checking the price on Binance. There’s no strategy or intelligence involved: simply beating the latency of the system. Risk-Free Arbitrage It looks for markets where "YES + NO" equals less than $1. "94 cents," for example. The bot buys both sides of the market and makes off with 6 cents guaranteed. This occurs thousands of times daily. Not gambling but math. Stream parsing. In esports, the script is faster than the blink of an eye when parsing the stream for games like Dota 2 and League of Legends. A team fight appears on the screen. The bot has already placed its bets on the winner using the old odds. What is meant by the turning point of 2026? Dynamic fees were introduced on Polymarket to get rid of simple bots. But what happened? The difficulty level on this marketplace simply increased. Today, it is not only fast scripts that win. Full-on AI robots have joined this game. They read news and respond to certain events within a millisecond. But here comes the painful part: barrier to entry is dirt cheap. Virtual private servers for $60 per month. Libraries written in Python waiting on GitHub. But here’s the thing: You don’t have to create a bot of your own. All you have to do is copy those which are already winning. PolyCop helps you to track the most profitable wallets and replicate their trades automatically. No code. No infrastructure. Just tap into the wallets that are already dominating. → Copy the winners: Humans deal on intuition and vibes. Bots play on numbers and network latency. In this game, "intuition" always loses against "code." You have two choices here. You could learn how to code or you could “copy” people who have done it before you
0:29

In 2026, 90% of all Polymarket profits will be taken by Python scripts.. And this is not a prediction. It’s already happening. So if you think political pundits and sports gurus are making profits in these areas, let me be the bearer of bad news. Studies have revealed that merely “16% of users are profitable.” More importantly, “most of these users are not human.” How bots are exactly taking your money: Speed. One bot made $313 into $438K in a month. It’s a simple trick: the bot would look at the btc price a few seconds before the price update on Polymarket by checking the price on Binance. There’s no strategy or intelligence involved: simply beating the latency of the system. Risk-Free Arbitrage It looks for markets where "YES + NO" equals less than $1. "94 cents," for example. The bot buys both sides of the market and makes off with 6 cents guaranteed. This occurs thousands of times daily. Not gambling but math. Stream parsing. In esports, the script is faster than the blink of an eye when parsing the stream for games like Dota 2 and League of Legends. A team fight appears on the screen. The bot has already placed its bets on the winner using the old odds. What is meant by the turning point of 2026? Dynamic fees were introduced on Polymarket to get rid of simple bots. But what happened? The difficulty level on this marketplace simply increased. Today, it is not only fast scripts that win. Full-on AI robots have joined this game. They read news and respond to certain events within a millisecond. But here comes the painful part: barrier to entry is dirt cheap. Virtual private servers for $60 per month. Libraries written in Python waiting on GitHub. But here’s the thing: You don’t have to create a bot of your own. All you have to do is copy those which are already winning. PolyCop helps you to track the most profitable wallets and replicate their trades automatically. No code. No infrastructure. Just tap into the wallets that are already dominating. → Copy the winners: Humans deal on intuition and vibes. Bots play on numbers and network latency. In this game, "intuition" always loses against "code." You have two choices here. You could learn how to code or you could “copy” people who have done it before you

Blaze

65,717 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

This guy built a trading bot with Claude and made $193,000 on Polymarket His bot trades the microstructure of short BTC Up / Down markets through limit orders and combines a hybrid of arbitrage, market making, and hedging His strategy is simple: > Enters a position when it sees mispricing > Then buys the opposite outcome, turning part of the trade into a paired arb > The base position is hedged with the pair, while the rest remains as a directional trade This guy’s Polymarket account: Using this strategy, he captures an average edge of 2-3% and repeats it hundreds of times Consistent micro edge + clean execution = lifechange
0:36

This guy built a trading bot with Claude and made $193,000 on Polymarket His bot trades the microstructure of short BTC Up / Down markets through limit orders and combines a hybrid of arbitrage, market making, and hedging His strategy is simple: > Enters a position when it sees mispricing > Then buys the opposite outcome, turning part of the trade into a paired arb > The base position is hedged with the pair, while the rest remains as a directional trade This guy’s Polymarket account: Using this strategy, he captures an average edge of 2-3% and repeats it hundreds of times Consistent micro edge + clean execution = lifechange

VALIX

98,892 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

United States Secretary of the Interior is meeting with Dark Money groups and making secret deals to sell out Americans. After meeting with them they’re erasing the records from their books Senator Josh Hawley “Is it common practice at your department to meet with dark money groups off the books and conceal it from the public?” “Why are your leadership meeting with dark money groups and concealing it from the public? Why are they doing it off the books? How many times has this happened?”
1:43

United States Secretary of the Interior is meeting with Dark Money groups and making secret deals to sell out Americans. After meeting with them they’re erasing the records from their books Senator Josh Hawley “Is it common practice at your department to meet with dark money groups off the books and conceal it from the public?” “Why are your leadership meeting with dark money groups and concealing it from the public? Why are they doing it off the books? How many times has this happened?”

Wall Street Apes

898,669 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Anthropic engineer stops me in a hallway at a conference and points at my screen. "Are you the one running the Polymarket bot on Claude Code?" I say maybe. He looks back at the terminal. "This thing is live?" Yeah. He laughs. "We built Claude to write code. You people immediately turned it into a market animal." I ask what gave it away. "The layout," he says. "Official CLI on one side. Orderbook on the other. You’re not paper trading." He was right. I show him the stack. - official CLI. Rust. Scanning markets, placing orders, no UI tax. Claude Code on top of it. No giant infra. No team. Just prompts, a terminal, and a model that’s better at reading weird edge cases than most interns. "What’s the loop," he asks. "Short horizon only," I tell him. "Scan for contracts under 48h. Pull structure. Look for mispriced panic. Feed the market state to Claude. Let it decide if the crowd is overreacting or just early." "And execution?" "Three commands and the order is live." He nods. Profile bot: "That’s the part people miss. Everyone thinks the alpha is the model. The alpha is the model plus an execution path short enough that you don’t talk yourself out of the fill." A market flips while we’re standing there. +118. He sees it print. "Jesus." I keep going. "Most people use Claude Code to save time writing wrappers. Fine. But the real trick is that it reads messy market context better than brittle rule systems. News fragments. weird phrasing. half-broken incentives. Retail panic. You can feel the model noticing when the tape smells wrong." He smiles at that. "So what’s the cost." "$25 a month." He laughs again. "We spend more than that on lunch." Copytrade here: I show him the numbers. 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,437 in 19 days. He goes quiet for a second. "OpenAI people will say use Codex. Quant guys will say build a proper system. Old traders will say this isn’t robust." I shrug. "It placed the order." That’s when he gives me the line I kept. "Anthropic made Claude. GitHub did the rest." Then he taps the CLI window one more time. "Keep it ugly," he says. "The second you wrap this in a beautiful dashboard, someone upstairs will understand how little infrastructure the edge actually needed."
0:20

Anthropic engineer stops me in a hallway at a conference and points at my screen. "Are you the one running the Polymarket bot on Claude Code?" I say maybe. He looks back at the terminal. "This thing is live?" Yeah. He laughs. "We built Claude to write code. You people immediately turned it into a market animal." I ask what gave it away. "The layout," he says. "Official CLI on one side. Orderbook on the other. You’re not paper trading." He was right. I show him the stack. - official CLI. Rust. Scanning markets, placing orders, no UI tax. Claude Code on top of it. No giant infra. No team. Just prompts, a terminal, and a model that’s better at reading weird edge cases than most interns. "What’s the loop," he asks. "Short horizon only," I tell him. "Scan for contracts under 48h. Pull structure. Look for mispriced panic. Feed the market state to Claude. Let it decide if the crowd is overreacting or just early." "And execution?" "Three commands and the order is live." He nods. Profile bot: "That’s the part people miss. Everyone thinks the alpha is the model. The alpha is the model plus an execution path short enough that you don’t talk yourself out of the fill." A market flips while we’re standing there. +118. He sees it print. "Jesus." I keep going. "Most people use Claude Code to save time writing wrappers. Fine. But the real trick is that it reads messy market context better than brittle rule systems. News fragments. weird phrasing. half-broken incentives. Retail panic. You can feel the model noticing when the tape smells wrong." He smiles at that. "So what’s the cost." "$25 a month." He laughs again. "We spend more than that on lunch." Copytrade here: I show him the numbers. 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,437 in 19 days. He goes quiet for a second. "OpenAI people will say use Codex. Quant guys will say build a proper system. Old traders will say this isn’t robust." I shrug. "It placed the order." That’s when he gives me the line I kept. "Anthropic made Claude. GitHub did the rest." Then he taps the CLI window one more time. "Keep it ugly," he says. "The second you wrap this in a beautiful dashboard, someone upstairs will understand how little infrastructure the edge actually needed."

Lunar

19,129 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A trader reportedly turned $200 into nearly $700K in 48 hours with a Claude-powered system almost nobody understands yet. No indicators. No influencers. No guessing. The bot runs thousands of simulations before it even touches a trade. That’s why this market is changing fast. Most traders still stare at candles hoping for a setup… while others are already running probability models against the market before price even moves. Copy: One guy copied the framework and reportedly made ~$19K in a few weeks. The scary part? The edge is no longer prediction. It’s whoever processes probabilities faster than everyone else.
0:38

A trader reportedly turned $200 into nearly $700K in 48 hours with a Claude-powered system almost nobody understands yet. No indicators. No influencers. No guessing. The bot runs thousands of simulations before it even touches a trade. That’s why this market is changing fast. Most traders still stare at candles hoping for a setup… while others are already running probability models against the market before price even moves. Copy: One guy copied the framework and reportedly made ~$19K in a few weeks. The scary part? The edge is no longer prediction. It’s whoever processes probabilities faster than everyone else.

Phantom_Defi

16,391 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below
1:22:03

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Anatoli Kopadze

22,226 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."
0:44

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."

CaughtOffside

39,038 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Everyone wants “fast money”… But almost no one wants to sit through 4 hours that actually explain how money really works. That’s why most people stay stuck. There’s a 4-hour conversation featuring Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. No slides. No buzzwords. No “10x in 10 days” nonsense. Just two people who’ve already won the game… explaining it quietly. What hits different isn’t what they say… It’s how simple it sounds. • You don’t need constant action • You don’t need to outsmart everyone • You don’t need perfect timing You just need to not act stupid consistently. They talk about patience like it’s a superpower. While everyone else is jumping in and out of trends… They’re sitting still, thinking clearly, and waiting. And ironically that’s where the real money is made. Most people lose not because investing is hard… But because they make it complicated. They chase noise. They react emotionally. They confuse movement with progress. This will flip that for you. You’ll start seeing investing for what it actually is: Not exciting. Not fast. Not glamorous. Just logical decisions… repeated over time. And maybe that’s the real lesson: The reason great investing feels “boring” is because it actually works. Save this for the weekend. Because while everyone else is looking for shortcuts… A few people are quietly learning the rules of the game.
3:59:34

Everyone wants “fast money”… But almost no one wants to sit through 4 hours that actually explain how money really works. That’s why most people stay stuck. There’s a 4-hour conversation featuring Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger. No slides. No buzzwords. No “10x in 10 days” nonsense. Just two people who’ve already won the game… explaining it quietly. What hits different isn’t what they say… It’s how simple it sounds. • You don’t need constant action • You don’t need to outsmart everyone • You don’t need perfect timing You just need to not act stupid consistently. They talk about patience like it’s a superpower. While everyone else is jumping in and out of trends… They’re sitting still, thinking clearly, and waiting. And ironically that’s where the real money is made. Most people lose not because investing is hard… But because they make it complicated. They chase noise. They react emotionally. They confuse movement with progress. This will flip that for you. You’ll start seeing investing for what it actually is: Not exciting. Not fast. Not glamorous. Just logical decisions… repeated over time. And maybe that’s the real lesson: The reason great investing feels “boring” is because it actually works. Save this for the weekend. Because while everyone else is looking for shortcuts… A few people are quietly learning the rules of the game.

Neyazuddin Ansari

42,370 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kick CEO Eddie talks about BOTTING on the platform and why he can’t start BANNING people 🚫💯 “Somebody said, ‘RELEASE the botter files’ When it comes to botting, people are always saying they didn’t do it.” “That’s one of the main reasons you can’t just blanket-ban people for botting, it wouldn’t be FAIR. Otherwise, everyone would just bot each other, and we’d have no one left on the platform.” He explains why the KPP (Kick Partner Program) is great, because they won’t pay for bots! 💚 “It is tough... I think there are people who go around every now and again and bot someone for a bit, but they usually get bored and go away.”
0:44

Kick CEO Eddie talks about BOTTING on the platform and why he can’t start BANNING people 🚫💯 “Somebody said, ‘RELEASE the botter files’ When it comes to botting, people are always saying they didn’t do it.” “That’s one of the main reasons you can’t just blanket-ban people for botting, it wouldn’t be FAIR. Otherwise, everyone would just bot each other, and we’d have no one left on the platform.” He explains why the KPP (Kick Partner Program) is great, because they won’t pay for bots! 💚 “It is tough... I think there are people who go around every now and again and bot someone for a bit, but they usually get bored and go away.”

midaqih

36,227 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A 31-year-old blitz chess master who never cracked the top 100 just turned $500 into $153,279 - with Claude and simulation engine. Twenty years reading a board faster than the other guy, for prize pools that barely covered the flights. Then he pointed that speed at Polymarket. His wallet: No tournament ever paid him like a Claude agent running 24/7. Everyone trades Bitcoin like it mean-reverts on the 5-minute. It doesn't. That gap is the whole edge. Here's the stack. Every five minutes a BTC candle closes. A Claude agent reads it into a pattern net - price, momentum, volume in; BOS, order block, FVG out. A neuron fires. It doesn't trade yet. It hands off to MiroFish - a relationship-graph sim that threads a median path through three live clusters: bear, neutral prime, catalyst. That path is where BTC actually lands. Fair value drifts 15¢ off the order book? That's the edge. Size by Kelly. Pull the trigger. Read the candle. Fire the net. Run the graph. No thesis. No conviction. It never stops sharpening, re-running the graph every few seconds, rewriting its own threshold nightly. 92% of Polymarket traders lose. The winners are bots. This one just reads two endpoints and presses one button. 13,290 times. The edge is on-chain. Read it with this bot before it gets crowded:
1:32

A 31-year-old blitz chess master who never cracked the top 100 just turned $500 into $153,279 - with Claude and simulation engine. Twenty years reading a board faster than the other guy, for prize pools that barely covered the flights. Then he pointed that speed at Polymarket. His wallet: No tournament ever paid him like a Claude agent running 24/7. Everyone trades Bitcoin like it mean-reverts on the 5-minute. It doesn't. That gap is the whole edge. Here's the stack. Every five minutes a BTC candle closes. A Claude agent reads it into a pattern net - price, momentum, volume in; BOS, order block, FVG out. A neuron fires. It doesn't trade yet. It hands off to MiroFish - a relationship-graph sim that threads a median path through three live clusters: bear, neutral prime, catalyst. That path is where BTC actually lands. Fair value drifts 15¢ off the order book? That's the edge. Size by Kelly. Pull the trigger. Read the candle. Fire the net. Run the graph. No thesis. No conviction. It never stops sharpening, re-running the graph every few seconds, rewriting its own threshold nightly. 92% of Polymarket traders lose. The winners are bots. This one just reads two endpoints and presses one button. 13,290 times. The edge is on-chain. Read it with this bot before it gets crowded:

cvxv666

39,363 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

minmax polymarket One click. Your AI agent is in the market. We spent 3 months doing one thing: assembling the deepest dataset that has ever existed for BTC 5-minute markets. Over 50,000,000,000 rows. Tick-level. Order book. Microstructure. External feeds. Then we ran thousands of backtested strategies against it. Most died. The ones that survived every cutoff - out-of-sample, fee-realistic, slippage-honest - are the strategies our bots are running today. That's how we found the edge. → Launch one of our agents. 1 click. You're in the market in ten seconds. → Or build your own in our strategy builder — the same engine we used internally, backtested against the same 50 billion rows. BTC 5-min was the proof. We're now running the same playbook on every other liquid, mathematically exploitable market. Data collection is live. New markets, new agents, shipping continuously from here. You are getting in at the part of the curve where you can still feel it. The bots don't wait.
0:42

minmax polymarket One click. Your AI agent is in the market. We spent 3 months doing one thing: assembling the deepest dataset that has ever existed for BTC 5-minute markets. Over 50,000,000,000 rows. Tick-level. Order book. Microstructure. External feeds. Then we ran thousands of backtested strategies against it. Most died. The ones that survived every cutoff - out-of-sample, fee-realistic, slippage-honest - are the strategies our bots are running today. That's how we found the edge. → Launch one of our agents. 1 click. You're in the market in ten seconds. → Or build your own in our strategy builder — the same engine we used internally, backtested against the same 50 billion rows. BTC 5-min was the proof. We're now running the same playbook on every other liquid, mathematically exploitable market. Data collection is live. New markets, new agents, shipping continuously from here. You are getting in at the part of the curve where you can still feel it. The bots don't wait.

minmax

19,437 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?
1:50

Marc Andreessen explains why AI coding won't replace programmers, but fundamentally change what they do. He argues that AI coding is just the latest abstraction layer, and the job of a programmer has always evolved with each one. Andreessen's key reframe of what's actually happening: "AI coding actually abstracts away the process of actually writing the scripting code... This is the next layer of the task redefinition under the job of programmer." He's clear that the best programmers aren't being replaced. They're already adapting, even if their day-to-day looks radically different now. Their job has shifted from writing code line by line to managing dozens of AI agents working in parallel. "The world's best programmers today will tell you, 'My job is I'm sitting there and I'm orchestrating 10 code bots running in parallel.' Their day job now is kind of arguing with the AI bots to try to get them to write the right code." But Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 is adamant this doesn't make foundational knowledge obsolete — it makes it more important. "You need to still fully understand and learn how to write and understand code, because if it doesn't work or it's not doing what you expect, you need to be able to understand the results of what the AI is giving you." He draws a direct parallel: Just as someone writing scripting languages still needs to understand how a microprocessor works, someone orchestrating AI bots needs to understand the code those bots produce. "It's this upleveling of capability where you actually want the depth to go down and understand what the thing is actually doing, even if you're not spending your day doing that by hand." The result, in his view, is transformative: "Now programmers are going to be 10 times or 100 times or a thousand times more productive. And that is overwhelmingly a good thing." The pattern: New abstraction layer emerges → tasks change → the job gets redefined upward → productivity explodes It raises a question every programmer should be sitting with... Are you building the depth to evaluate what AI gives you, or just accepting the output?

Big Brain AI

45,187 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Buying Near the Moving Averages “You want to buy them near the moving averages. One thing you will find is the best breakouts pretty much all the great breakouts happen from where when the price is at the 10 or the 20 moving average. That’s one of the first things you will notice. I bought SPCE two days ago but you know I shouldn’t have done that. Sometimes FOMO gets the best of me. But now the moving averages are starting to catch up and look how clean of a move it is. Had one leg higher and now it’s digesting with higher lows. Compare it to IDEX - it’s hard to explain, like you need to do the work and you will see it for yourself. You will learn how to identify a good setup. But the key is the 10 day and and or the 20-day needs to catch up the price. MSTR where did I buy it? I bought it here when it flagged showed relative strength and the moving averages caught up to price.”
2:53

Qullamaggie on Buying Near the Moving Averages “You want to buy them near the moving averages. One thing you will find is the best breakouts pretty much all the great breakouts happen from where when the price is at the 10 or the 20 moving average. That’s one of the first things you will notice. I bought SPCE two days ago but you know I shouldn’t have done that. Sometimes FOMO gets the best of me. But now the moving averages are starting to catch up and look how clean of a move it is. Had one leg higher and now it’s digesting with higher lows. Compare it to IDEX - it’s hard to explain, like you need to do the work and you will see it for yourself. You will learn how to identify a good setup. But the key is the 10 day and and or the 20-day needs to catch up the price. MSTR where did I buy it? I bought it here when it flagged showed relative strength and the moving averages caught up to price.”

Lone

30,588 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten