正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

DEXs evolve faster than solvers can keep up, and often rely on contracts that can change. Oracles, rebasing tokens, Uniswap v4 hooks, external-liquidity pools - all are hard to integrate for this reason. Tycho’s new Dynamic Contract Indexing (DCI) makes it a breeze 🌟

10,884 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Cross-Chain Arbitrage on Uniswap V4 (opportunities available) I’ve always been curious: how much do prices actually differ between the “same” Uniswap V4 pool deployed across different chains? Think ETH/USDC on Ethereum vs on Unichain, Arbitrum, or Base . They’re technically the same trading pair, but entirely separate pools, with different liquidity, fees, and most importantly, prices. So I built a dashboard to monitor exactly that. It tracks real-time price discrepancies across Uniswap V4 pools on different chains. Why? I was curious. I wanted to understand: - How often do mispricings occur? - How big are those discrepancies? - And perhaps most interestingly: how fast are they arbitraged away? On the same chain, arbitrage between DEXs is well understood. You can create a smart contract that executes a set of swaps atomically, either guaranteeing profit or reverting the transaction. But cross-chain? That’s a different game. Different chains mean different execution environments, timing issues, and gas fee structures. It’s harder to coordinate. It’s also harder to monitor... What I’ve Built (So Far) Right now, the dashboard monitors the ETH/USDC pair across four chains in real time. You can visually see: - Realtime ETH price on each chain - Size of most recent trades indicated by bubble size - Max current spread available. I've only finished it this afternoon and after watching it for 15min I've already spotted a few times where the mispricings are significant. I want to add more pairs and chains soon (super easy actually) - just don't want to clutter it before getting more feedback and ideas. I’ve dropped the link to the dashboard in the comments below. If you’ve built a cross-chain arb bot, I’d love to hear how you approached it!

jonjon

45,149 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 BREAKING: THERE ARE RUMORS YOU CAN NOW CREATE "SAFE TOKENS" DIRECTLY ON ETHERVISTADEX What are "Safe Tokens"? "Safe Tokens" are tokens generated through our SafeTokenFactory smart contract. These tokens are designed to eliminate vulnerabilities such as mintable functions or scammy taxes and come with a standardized implementation. Before swapping, users can easily verify whether a token is "safe" or if additional caution is needed. This marks a significant step forward in enhancing the quality of projects launched on Ethervista. But does this compromise the customizability of ERC tokens? Not at all. The Ethervista Protocol smart contract allows for a limitless range of applications. Take the $VISTA contract, for example. It's a standard ERC20 token, but with the Ethervista Protocol smart contract, it automatically buys and burns tokens. Similar logic can be applied to any ERC20 token using EthervistaDEX’s unique Protocol feature. What other features would you like to see? Wen dashboards? Wen streaming? We're on it—we just hired a full-time full-stack engineer! Special shoutout to Bonzi - FIRST MEME and MASCOT @ Ethervista and Clippy - Microsoft Anti AI Helper @ Ethervista, the first whitelisted tokens. We will continue to strongly support tokens that burn part of their liquidity before the 5-day lock period and those with strong communities and utility. A final note to creators: We would like to emphasize that burning lp-tokens does not alter your share of rewards UNTIL you remove, add, or claim rewards, which automatically updates your pool share ratio based on your current balance and the total lp-supply, as outlined in our whitepaper. This DOES NOT affect protocol fees, which are used to support both the protocol and creators.

Ethervista

130,508 次观看 • 1 年前