Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dharavi Was Ignored for 40 Years. Blocking Its Redevelopment Is Not “Protecting” Residents. For over four decades, #Dharavi remained frozen in policy limbo. Governments changed. Tenders were formulated. Announcements were made. Nothing moved. Now that redevelopment is finally underway, the loudest voices are not offering constructive solutions—they are offering...

SheetalPronamo's profile picture

Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳

131,941 subscribers

21,699 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

ArtsNews & PoliticsScience & Technology#Dharavi
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

At the Adani Annual Conference, 2026, in Mumbai, Pranav Adani outlined the vision behind the Dharavi Redevelopment Project. Spread over 600 acres, this project is one of the world’s largest and most ambitious urban regeneration initiatives in a city. For the Adani Group, it is a unique opportunity to provide a life of dignity to over 1 million people who have been living in extremely difficult conditions for decades. Under this initiative, a modern infrastructure hub will be created, secure homes will be built and essential amenities will be provided to the residents – a city will be developed inside a city. Because at its heart, this transformation is about the people, restoring their dignity and ensuring a better tomorrow for them.
2:03

At the Adani Annual Conference, 2026, in Mumbai, Pranav Adani outlined the vision behind the Dharavi Redevelopment Project. Spread over 600 acres, this project is one of the world’s largest and most ambitious urban regeneration initiatives in a city. For the Adani Group, it is a unique opportunity to provide a life of dignity to over 1 million people who have been living in extremely difficult conditions for decades. Under this initiative, a modern infrastructure hub will be created, secure homes will be built and essential amenities will be provided to the residents – a city will be developed inside a city. Because at its heart, this transformation is about the people, restoring their dignity and ensuring a better tomorrow for them.

Adani Group

59,288 views • 1 month ago

There is a new scam in the eligible and ineligible list being released by the Adani Sarkar. The ground floor residences are being declared ineligible while the first floor residents are being declared eligible. First floor residents are only eligible for rental housing in Deonar, Mulund and other faraway lands that are being usurped in the name of Dharavi. Once ground floor residents are declared ineligible, the Adani Sarkar doesn't have to provide housing to people living in that structure within Dharavi. This is their loot model. The idea is to declare as many ground floor residents as possible ineligible so that they can usurp all the land in Dharavi and dump Dharavikars outside! Met members of business bodies in Dharavi today to discuss their concerns regarding the Dharavi Vinash project. the growth engine of Dharavi, its commercial structures are not being made eligible based on antiquity and existence of the structure itself but on the basis of individuals working there. We will not let Dharavi be looted piece by piece. This is the fight for people's rights to their homes, their livelihood and their identity itself and Dharavi is united in this fight. #ModaniHataoMumbaiBachao #Mumbai #PeopleVsAdaniSarkar Mallikarjun Kharge Rahul Gandhi Supriya Shrinate Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 Raju Parulekar ParanjoyGuhaThakurta
3:28

There is a new scam in the eligible and ineligible list being released by the Adani Sarkar. The ground floor residences are being declared ineligible while the first floor residents are being declared eligible. First floor residents are only eligible for rental housing in Deonar, Mulund and other faraway lands that are being usurped in the name of Dharavi. Once ground floor residents are declared ineligible, the Adani Sarkar doesn't have to provide housing to people living in that structure within Dharavi. This is their loot model. The idea is to declare as many ground floor residents as possible ineligible so that they can usurp all the land in Dharavi and dump Dharavikars outside! Met members of business bodies in Dharavi today to discuss their concerns regarding the Dharavi Vinash project. the growth engine of Dharavi, its commercial structures are not being made eligible based on antiquity and existence of the structure itself but on the basis of individuals working there. We will not let Dharavi be looted piece by piece. This is the fight for people's rights to their homes, their livelihood and their identity itself and Dharavi is united in this fight. #ModaniHataoMumbaiBachao #Mumbai #PeopleVsAdaniSarkar Mallikarjun Kharge Rahul Gandhi Supriya Shrinate Pawan Khera 🇮🇳 Raju Parulekar ParanjoyGuhaThakurta

Prof. Varsha Eknath Gaikwad

24,497 views • 1 year ago

🚨 Arrogance of Power in Motilal Nagar Redevelopment Exposed The conduct of Devendra Fadnavis’s close bureaucratic associate, Sanjeev Jaiswal, during the Motilal Nagar redevelopment presentation in Goregaon (West) has sparked serious outrage. A local resident, who was peacefully raising his concerns under his constitutional rights, was allegedly met with धमकी भरी language—being called an “intruder,” asked for ID, and even warned of being forcefully picked up. This is not governance—this is intimidation. ❓ Is Asking Questions Now a Crime in a Democracy? In a democratic country like India, every citizen has the right to question authorities and demand transparency. Silencing residents with threats only exposes the failure of an अधिकारी who clearly lacks basic public dealing skills. Officers in such powerful positions must undergo proper training on how to speak respectfully with citizens, not behave like enforcers. 🏘️ 50+ Years of History Ignored Motilal Nagar is not just a redevelopment project—it is home to thousands of families who have lived there for over five decades. Their future cannot be decided without their consent, trust, and participation. Ignoring their voices while pushing decisions from the top only creates fear and distrust. ⚠️ Lessons Not Learnt from Past Redevelopment Failures Nearby redevelopment projects like Patra Chawl and Unnat Nagar have already shown issues of delays, displacement, and unequal benefits. Yet, the same mistakes are being repeated. Why are Motilal Nagar residents not being offered fair and transparent terms? 📢 Redevelopment Cannot Be Forced—It Must Be Earned Redevelopment is meant for the people, not to be imposed on them. Respect, dialogue, and transparency must be the foundation. Authorities must immediately step in, ensure direct communication with residents, and hold officials accountable for such behavior. 👉 Final Message Public servants must remember—they are servants of the people, not rulers. If an officer does not know how to speak with respect, then proper behavioural training is not optional—it is necessary. Democracy should not just exist on paper, it must be visible in action. जय हिंद | जय महाराष्ट्र CMO Maharashtra MMRDA Prof. Varsha Eknath Gaikwad Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे Ravindra Waikar Sunetra Ajit Pawar Kamlakar Shenoy Janak Keshriya ANIL GALGALI Ms Aftab Siddique Zoru Bhathena Richa Pinto Hindustan Times TOI India midwaytimes
1:32

🚨 Arrogance of Power in Motilal Nagar Redevelopment Exposed The conduct of Devendra Fadnavis’s close bureaucratic associate, Sanjeev Jaiswal, during the Motilal Nagar redevelopment presentation in Goregaon (West) has sparked serious outrage. A local resident, who was peacefully raising his concerns under his constitutional rights, was allegedly met with धमकी भरी language—being called an “intruder,” asked for ID, and even warned of being forcefully picked up. This is not governance—this is intimidation. ❓ Is Asking Questions Now a Crime in a Democracy? In a democratic country like India, every citizen has the right to question authorities and demand transparency. Silencing residents with threats only exposes the failure of an अधिकारी who clearly lacks basic public dealing skills. Officers in such powerful positions must undergo proper training on how to speak respectfully with citizens, not behave like enforcers. 🏘️ 50+ Years of History Ignored Motilal Nagar is not just a redevelopment project—it is home to thousands of families who have lived there for over five decades. Their future cannot be decided without their consent, trust, and participation. Ignoring their voices while pushing decisions from the top only creates fear and distrust. ⚠️ Lessons Not Learnt from Past Redevelopment Failures Nearby redevelopment projects like Patra Chawl and Unnat Nagar have already shown issues of delays, displacement, and unequal benefits. Yet, the same mistakes are being repeated. Why are Motilal Nagar residents not being offered fair and transparent terms? 📢 Redevelopment Cannot Be Forced—It Must Be Earned Redevelopment is meant for the people, not to be imposed on them. Respect, dialogue, and transparency must be the foundation. Authorities must immediately step in, ensure direct communication with residents, and hold officials accountable for such behavior. 👉 Final Message Public servants must remember—they are servants of the people, not rulers. If an officer does not know how to speak with respect, then proper behavioural training is not optional—it is necessary. Democracy should not just exist on paper, it must be visible in action. जय हिंद | जय महाराष्ट्र CMO Maharashtra MMRDA Prof. Varsha Eknath Gaikwad Eknath Shinde - एकनाथ शिंदे Ravindra Waikar Sunetra Ajit Pawar Kamlakar Shenoy Janak Keshriya ANIL GALGALI Ms Aftab Siddique Zoru Bhathena Richa Pinto Hindustan Times TOI India midwaytimes

Mohnaaz S Shaikh.

108,662 views • 3 months ago

The residents of Bukoto Katende Zone state that the situation is not acceptable on any level and urge Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to listen to the noise, saying that they cannot sleep. They add that residents along Kisota Road and surrounding communities also cannot sleep, and tell National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) that a bulldozer is not needed for this issue. They explain that a bar has been built in what is clearly a wetland in their residential neighborhood land that used to serve as parking yards for trucks and is operating every single night with blaring music and shouting on microphones, showing complete disregard for the people living there. They say that families cannot sleep, there is no peace, and there is no enforcement. The residents point out that the wetland was not cleared quietly, but in broad daylight over time, under KCCA’s watch. They note that evidence has been shared and complaints have been raised, yet nothing has been done. They ask where the City Public Health Department, enforcement, and accountability are. They emphasize that the issue is bigger than noise, describing it as environmental destruction, public health negligence, and a failure of duty. The residents stress that a wetland is not just empty land, as it protects the city from flooding, supports ecosystems, and is legally protected. They warn that allowing it to be grabbed and turned into a noise-polluting commercial space sets a dangerous precedent that laws and communities do not matter. They further argue that when a bar operates nightly at full volume in a residential area with no intervention, it sends a clear message that enforcement is optional which, they insist, it is not. The residents call on Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to do its job by shutting down illegal operations in protected wetlands, enforcing noise regulations immediately, responding to citizen reports in real time, and restoring order to protect the environment and give residents back their right to peace at night. They state that the situation is ongoing, visible, and documented, and urge KCCA to listen to the noise levels from across the road where Gen. Wamala was shot. They conclude that the matter demands action immediately. Cc: Eddie Okila(One of the residents)
0:33

The residents of Bukoto Katende Zone state that the situation is not acceptable on any level and urge Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to listen to the noise, saying that they cannot sleep. They add that residents along Kisota Road and surrounding communities also cannot sleep, and tell National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) that a bulldozer is not needed for this issue. They explain that a bar has been built in what is clearly a wetland in their residential neighborhood land that used to serve as parking yards for trucks and is operating every single night with blaring music and shouting on microphones, showing complete disregard for the people living there. They say that families cannot sleep, there is no peace, and there is no enforcement. The residents point out that the wetland was not cleared quietly, but in broad daylight over time, under KCCA’s watch. They note that evidence has been shared and complaints have been raised, yet nothing has been done. They ask where the City Public Health Department, enforcement, and accountability are. They emphasize that the issue is bigger than noise, describing it as environmental destruction, public health negligence, and a failure of duty. The residents stress that a wetland is not just empty land, as it protects the city from flooding, supports ecosystems, and is legally protected. They warn that allowing it to be grabbed and turned into a noise-polluting commercial space sets a dangerous precedent that laws and communities do not matter. They further argue that when a bar operates nightly at full volume in a residential area with no intervention, it sends a clear message that enforcement is optional which, they insist, it is not. The residents call on Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA) to do its job by shutting down illegal operations in protected wetlands, enforcing noise regulations immediately, responding to citizen reports in real time, and restoring order to protect the environment and give residents back their right to peace at night. They state that the situation is ongoing, visible, and documented, and urge KCCA to listen to the noise levels from across the road where Gen. Wamala was shot. They conclude that the matter demands action immediately. Cc: Eddie Okila(One of the residents)

Mwami lu

32,908 views • 3 months ago

Rwanda ... Is Not Choosing Sides in Congo. It Is Preventing Another Genocide. When people talk about the crisis between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, they often start from the map. Borders. Sovereignty. Diplomacy. Rwanda starts somewhere else. It starts from memory. Rwanda has been very clear about one thing: its security cannot be understood as beginning at its borders. Not because Rwanda seeks influence. But because history taught it … brutally … what happens when threats are allowed to grow just beyond them. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. This is not abstract history for Rwanda. It is lived experience. Between 1994 and 1999, genocidal forces operating from Congolese territory launched an insurgency aimed at finishing what they had started. Civilians were killed. Genocide survivors were targeted. Schools were attacked. Children were separated by ethnicity and murdered. This was not theoretical insecurity. It was existential. Today, many observers argue that the FDLR is weak … that its numbers have declined. But numbers are not the point anymore. The threat has evolved. What we are witnessing now is not the FDLR as a fugitive militia hiding in forests. It is the FDLR as a state-embedded actor. Through the Wazalendo framework, genocidal forces have gained access to weapons, logistics, intelligence, and political protection. They have positioned themselves as the ideological and operational core of a much larger armed ecosystem. This is a system-level threat. And that distinction matters. When Rwanda’s Ambassador in Washington explained this security reality before the U.S. Congress, some rushed to claim it was proof that Rwanda supports AFC/M23. That conclusion is wrong. Explaining a threat is not the same as endorsing a political movement. Security analysis is not political sponsorship. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congolese politics. It is not seeking to determine governance outcomes in the DRC. And it does not endorse armed groups as substitutes for inclusive governance. Its concern is singular: preventing the re-emergence of a genocidal cross-border insurgency. Reducing this to accusations of “backing rebels” may be convenient … but it avoids the real question: Why are genocidal forces being tolerated, protected, and integrated into state-sanctioned security structures in the first place? We have seen this movie before. In Sudan, militias empowered by the state turned into the Rapid Support Forces — and the country collapsed into civil war. In Ethiopia, reliance on irregular armed groups produced fragmentation and prolonged violence. In Libya, revolutionary militias destroyed the state they were meant to protect. The DRC is now walking the same path. But with one crucial difference: here, the ideological core of this mobilization is genocidal. And Rwanda knows what that means. Because Rwanda rebuilt itself while carrying open wounds, in its own flesh. While reconstructing its social fabric. While choosing reconciliation over revenge. And it did so largely alone. No one came in 1994. No one dismantled the genocidal networks afterward. No one protected Rwanda for the last thirty years. So today, no one can credibly tell Rwanda that it must outsource its survival. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congo. It is preventing another genocide. And until genocidal forces are dismantled … not explained away, not rebranded, not absorbed … Rwanda will continue to act on the lesson history imposed upon it: “Never again” is not a slogan. It is a responsibility.
5:10

Rwanda ... Is Not Choosing Sides in Congo. It Is Preventing Another Genocide. When people talk about the crisis between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda, they often start from the map. Borders. Sovereignty. Diplomacy. Rwanda starts somewhere else. It starts from memory. Rwanda has been very clear about one thing: its security cannot be understood as beginning at its borders. Not because Rwanda seeks influence. But because history taught it … brutally … what happens when threats are allowed to grow just beyond them. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. In 1994, the Genocide against the Tutsi unfolded under the watch of the United Nations Security Council, the most powerful states on earth. They were warned. They did nothing. More than a million people were killed in just one hundred days. And still, nothing was done to stop it. But what is even less discussed… is what happened after. The perpetrators were not dismantled. They were not neutralized. They fled, largely into eastern Congo, reorganized, rebranded, and continued their project. And they have been doing so… for three decades. This is not abstract history for Rwanda. It is lived experience. Between 1994 and 1999, genocidal forces operating from Congolese territory launched an insurgency aimed at finishing what they had started. Civilians were killed. Genocide survivors were targeted. Schools were attacked. Children were separated by ethnicity and murdered. This was not theoretical insecurity. It was existential. Today, many observers argue that the FDLR is weak … that its numbers have declined. But numbers are not the point anymore. The threat has evolved. What we are witnessing now is not the FDLR as a fugitive militia hiding in forests. It is the FDLR as a state-embedded actor. Through the Wazalendo framework, genocidal forces have gained access to weapons, logistics, intelligence, and political protection. They have positioned themselves as the ideological and operational core of a much larger armed ecosystem. This is a system-level threat. And that distinction matters. When Rwanda’s Ambassador in Washington explained this security reality before the U.S. Congress, some rushed to claim it was proof that Rwanda supports AFC/M23. That conclusion is wrong. Explaining a threat is not the same as endorsing a political movement. Security analysis is not political sponsorship. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congolese politics. It is not seeking to determine governance outcomes in the DRC. And it does not endorse armed groups as substitutes for inclusive governance. Its concern is singular: preventing the re-emergence of a genocidal cross-border insurgency. Reducing this to accusations of “backing rebels” may be convenient … but it avoids the real question: Why are genocidal forces being tolerated, protected, and integrated into state-sanctioned security structures in the first place? We have seen this movie before. In Sudan, militias empowered by the state turned into the Rapid Support Forces — and the country collapsed into civil war. In Ethiopia, reliance on irregular armed groups produced fragmentation and prolonged violence. In Libya, revolutionary militias destroyed the state they were meant to protect. The DRC is now walking the same path. But with one crucial difference: here, the ideological core of this mobilization is genocidal. And Rwanda knows what that means. Because Rwanda rebuilt itself while carrying open wounds, in its own flesh. While reconstructing its social fabric. While choosing reconciliation over revenge. And it did so largely alone. No one came in 1994. No one dismantled the genocidal networks afterward. No one protected Rwanda for the last thirty years. So today, no one can credibly tell Rwanda that it must outsource its survival. Rwanda is not choosing sides in Congo. It is preventing another genocide. And until genocidal forces are dismantled … not explained away, not rebranded, not absorbed … Rwanda will continue to act on the lesson history imposed upon it: “Never again” is not a slogan. It is a responsibility.

Albert Rudatsimburwa 🇷🇼

15,193 views • 5 months ago

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,083 views • 3 months ago

Today we visited the historic Matapi Flats in Mbare, where the renovation project spearheaded by Engineer Collins Mnangagwa is making remarkable progress. The work goes beyond the exterior—apartments are also being refurbished inside to restore the dignity, safety, and decent living conditions that every Zimbabwean deserves. This project reflects President E.D. Mnangagwa's President of Zimbabwe vision that "no one and no place should be left behind." It is encouraging to see this commitment being translated into tangible improvements in people's lives. The Matapi Flats, which were constructed in the 1940s, are finally receiving a new lease on life after decades of deterioration. This transformation is not only preserving an important part of Harare's history but also improving the quality of life for thousands of residents. It is also encouraging to see the City of Harare City Of Harare SunshineCity becoming actively involved now that this initiative is underway. Many residents are asking a valid question: Where was this urgency all these years? Nevertheless, what matters most is that meaningful action is now being taken. This is a practical example of development that restores hope, protects communities, and gives residents the dignity they deserve.
0:30

Today we visited the historic Matapi Flats in Mbare, where the renovation project spearheaded by Engineer Collins Mnangagwa is making remarkable progress. The work goes beyond the exterior—apartments are also being refurbished inside to restore the dignity, safety, and decent living conditions that every Zimbabwean deserves. This project reflects President E.D. Mnangagwa's President of Zimbabwe vision that "no one and no place should be left behind." It is encouraging to see this commitment being translated into tangible improvements in people's lives. The Matapi Flats, which were constructed in the 1940s, are finally receiving a new lease on life after decades of deterioration. This transformation is not only preserving an important part of Harare's history but also improving the quality of life for thousands of residents. It is also encouraging to see the City of Harare City Of Harare SunshineCity becoming actively involved now that this initiative is underway. Many residents are asking a valid question: Where was this urgency all these years? Nevertheless, what matters most is that meaningful action is now being taken. This is a practical example of development that restores hope, protects communities, and gives residents the dignity they deserve.

BaShona.

19,751 views • 19 days ago

"Men do not stay for platitudes. Platitudes do not carry a soul through the winter. When the child is in the ground, when the marriage is in ruins, when the diagnosis comes back and the floor drops out of the world, no one was ever held up by 'be kind and stay positive.' They are held, if they are held at all, by something with iron in it. By a witness that the heavens are real and open, that God still speaks, that the dead are not lost, that there is power on the earth greater than the darkness. The early Saints had that, and they knew they had it, because they had felt it in their own bodies. They were healed under hands. They spoke in tongues. They saw visions and buried their children in the certainty of resurrection and crossed a continent on the strength of a fire they could not have faked. That is what converts a man and that is what keeps him, not a well managed self-help program, but the living evidence that what we preach is true. So the cure is not complicated, and it is not new. It is to be again the Church of our fathers. Stop apologizing. Stop trimming the glorious truth into something the world will pat on the head. Speak with authority and with the hammer, the way Joseph spoke, the way Brigham spoke, the way men speak when they actually believe the heavens have opened over them. Reach again for the gifts of the Spirit, and stop pretending they were a founding era curiosity, because a testimony built on argument crumbles in the first storm and a testimony built on the manifest power of God does not. And above all, live as though the heavens are open, because they are, and they have only ever felt closed to a people who stopped expecting them to answer. The Saints are not leaving because the gospel is too much. They are leaving because we have made it too little. Make it glorious and demanding again, and watch who comes back through the door. The hungry have not gone anywhere. We simply stopped setting the table."
0:54

"Men do not stay for platitudes. Platitudes do not carry a soul through the winter. When the child is in the ground, when the marriage is in ruins, when the diagnosis comes back and the floor drops out of the world, no one was ever held up by 'be kind and stay positive.' They are held, if they are held at all, by something with iron in it. By a witness that the heavens are real and open, that God still speaks, that the dead are not lost, that there is power on the earth greater than the darkness. The early Saints had that, and they knew they had it, because they had felt it in their own bodies. They were healed under hands. They spoke in tongues. They saw visions and buried their children in the certainty of resurrection and crossed a continent on the strength of a fire they could not have faked. That is what converts a man and that is what keeps him, not a well managed self-help program, but the living evidence that what we preach is true. So the cure is not complicated, and it is not new. It is to be again the Church of our fathers. Stop apologizing. Stop trimming the glorious truth into something the world will pat on the head. Speak with authority and with the hammer, the way Joseph spoke, the way Brigham spoke, the way men speak when they actually believe the heavens have opened over them. Reach again for the gifts of the Spirit, and stop pretending they were a founding era curiosity, because a testimony built on argument crumbles in the first storm and a testimony built on the manifest power of God does not. And above all, live as though the heavens are open, because they are, and they have only ever felt closed to a people who stopped expecting them to answer. The Saints are not leaving because the gospel is too much. They are leaving because we have made it too little. Make it glorious and demanding again, and watch who comes back through the door. The hungry have not gone anywhere. We simply stopped setting the table."

Kirk Rollins

63,131 views • 1 month ago

#PranavAdani on Infrastructure and a $30 Trillion India At the #AgendaAajTak programme, Pranav Adani connected India’s renewable push with a much larger economic narrative. He argued that if India aims to become a $30 trillion economy by 2047, infrastructure—hard, long-term, capital-intensive infrastructure—will be one of the decisive factors. He explained that the #AdaniGroup does not plan only for the next one or two years. Instead, it thinks in 15–20 year cycles, aligning its investments with India’s long-term national goals. The Khavda solar development is one example of this long-horizon planning. Similar thinking is visible in ports, airports, city redevelopment and logistics networks. The goal is not just to participate in India’s growth, but to shape the backbone that will carry that growth for decades. #PranavAdani’s message at #AgendaAajTak was clear: if India wants to achieve its 2047 aspirations, it needs companies willing to build patiently, at scale and with generational intent. #India2047 #Infrastructure #LongTermThinking
1:20

#PranavAdani on Infrastructure and a $30 Trillion India At the #AgendaAajTak programme, Pranav Adani connected India’s renewable push with a much larger economic narrative. He argued that if India aims to become a $30 trillion economy by 2047, infrastructure—hard, long-term, capital-intensive infrastructure—will be one of the decisive factors. He explained that the #AdaniGroup does not plan only for the next one or two years. Instead, it thinks in 15–20 year cycles, aligning its investments with India’s long-term national goals. The Khavda solar development is one example of this long-horizon planning. Similar thinking is visible in ports, airports, city redevelopment and logistics networks. The goal is not just to participate in India’s growth, but to shape the backbone that will carry that growth for decades. #PranavAdani’s message at #AgendaAajTak was clear: if India wants to achieve its 2047 aspirations, it needs companies willing to build patiently, at scale and with generational intent. #India2047 #Infrastructure #LongTermThinking

Sheetal Chopra 🇮🇳

19,481 views • 7 months ago

Why are Dharavi residents happy with the Dharavi Redevelopment Project? Does not matter whether #Adani builds it or someone else. Because this tender model is the best model so far in India. Win-Win for All. 1. Previous Govts failed them with false hopes for almost 40 years. 2. India's first slum redevelopment project to give house for all residents. 3. World's Largest & Prestigious Slum Redevelopment Project ~$3 Billion Investment (₹23000 Crore). 4. World Class Infra with big roads, parks, schools, hospitals and a proper drainage and water facilities. They will get a dignified life. 5. Free 1 BHK Apartment for all who settled before 2000 within Dharavi. 6. 1 BHK Apartment @ rate of ₹2.5 Lakha Only under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana for all who settled between 1 Jan 2000 - 1 Jan 2011 within Mumbai. 7. Affordable Rental Housing (1 BHK) for all who settled after 1 Jan 2011 within Mumbai. 8. All commercial units to get a proper commercial complex within Dharavi. 9. No State GST for the first 5 years for any commercial units. 10. Survey conducted by 40 teams at 21000 residential and commercial units. 11. Construction to begin in 6 months. But the Opposition wants to stop this project. #DharaviMaangeNyay #DharaviBanaoAndolan #MaharashtraElections2024
2:04

Why are Dharavi residents happy with the Dharavi Redevelopment Project? Does not matter whether #Adani builds it or someone else. Because this tender model is the best model so far in India. Win-Win for All. 1. Previous Govts failed them with false hopes for almost 40 years. 2. India's first slum redevelopment project to give house for all residents. 3. World's Largest & Prestigious Slum Redevelopment Project ~$3 Billion Investment (₹23000 Crore). 4. World Class Infra with big roads, parks, schools, hospitals and a proper drainage and water facilities. They will get a dignified life. 5. Free 1 BHK Apartment for all who settled before 2000 within Dharavi. 6. 1 BHK Apartment @ rate of ₹2.5 Lakha Only under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana for all who settled between 1 Jan 2000 - 1 Jan 2011 within Mumbai. 7. Affordable Rental Housing (1 BHK) for all who settled after 1 Jan 2011 within Mumbai. 8. All commercial units to get a proper commercial complex within Dharavi. 9. No State GST for the first 5 years for any commercial units. 10. Survey conducted by 40 teams at 21000 residential and commercial units. 11. Construction to begin in 6 months. But the Opposition wants to stop this project. #DharaviMaangeNyay #DharaviBanaoAndolan #MaharashtraElections2024

Atul Chanpuriya

30,986 views • 1 year ago

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.
1:00

Mark Zuckerberg just told you exactly why trillion-dollar companies lose to people who have nothing. Zuckerberg: “Large companies are slow and they lack conviction.” Nine words. The entire vulnerability of every empire on earth in a single sentence. Google had the talent. Microsoft had the infrastructure. Yahoo had the distribution. Every single one of them could have built Facebook. None of them did. Zuckerberg: “We were like a ragtag group of children.” Not seasoned executives. Not credentialed engineers with decades of experience. Children. Against the most well-funded technology companies on the planet. And the children won. Not because they were smarter. Not because they had better resources. Because they believed in something the giants were too comfortable to take seriously. Capital does not beat conviction. Infrastructure does not beat speed. Talent does not beat the willingness to look stupid building something no one respects yet. The giants had everything except the one thing that actually mattered. The inability to hesitate. A large company sees a new idea and runs it through committees. They commission research. They weigh the risk. They debate the market size. They ask what happens to the existing product line. By the time the organization agrees the idea is worth pursuing the window is already closed. The person who builds it does not go through that process. They just build. No committee. No consensus. No permission. They move before the math is finished because they can feel the answer before the spreadsheet confirms it. That is not recklessness. That is the only speed that matters when the window is open. Zuckerberg: “People doubt new ideas before they come to fruition.” It is never one doubt. It is a rotating series of doubts that shift every time the previous one is proven wrong. Zuckerberg: “It’s just like this college kid thing.” That was the first wall. It is small. It is niche. It is not serious. Then it grew. “Maybe not college kids, but it’s probably a fad.” Then it kept growing. “Maybe it’s not a fad, but it’s probably not gonna make money.” Then it made money. “Okay it makes money, but the switch to mobile is gonna be pretty hard.” Every single objection was wrong. Every single one served the same function. It gave the doubter permission to do nothing for one more cycle. That is not analysis. That is self-preservation dressed as skepticism. The person too slow to build the thing will always find a reason why the thing will not work. Not because the reasons are good. Because the alternative is admitting they missed it. You are watching the exact same pattern play out with AI right now. First it was a toy. Then it hallucinated too much. Then it was not profitable. Then it was a bubble. Then it was going to plateau. Every cycle the objection changes. The function never does. Zuckerberg built a company worth over a trillion dollars against competitors who had every advantage except the willingness to commit before the outcome was guaranteed. That is the only advantage that has ever mattered. Not capital. Not credentials. Not infrastructure. The willingness to be wrong in public long enough to become undeniably right. The giants will always have more money. More engineers. More servers. More distribution. They will always be slower than the person who does not need a meeting to make a decision. The committee will never outrun the individual who already started. The incumbents are not dangerous because they are strong. They are vulnerable because they are careful. And careful has never once in the history of technology built the thing that changed the world. It has only ever bought it after someone else already did.

Dustin

20,938 views • 3 months ago

He was 5 years old when his parents had to make an unthinkable choice. Keep their son with them under communism. Or send him away alone so he could have a shot at freedom. That was Andy Garcia’s reality. And he was not the only one. Thousands of Cuban children were separated from their families because their parents knew what that system was doing. It was not just taking homes or businesses. It was trying to control people completely. Their future. Their beliefs. Their identity. Their freedom. Imagine being forced to choose between raising your child and saving your child. Some families reunited. A lot of them never did. Now look at Cuba today. Cubans are sitting in the dark without electricity. They are struggling to eat. They are in the streets banging pots because it is the only way left to make noise. And while that is happening, these activists fly in, sit in air conditioned buildings, speak into microphones, eat catered food, and call it solidarity. Give me a break. You cannot claim to stand with oppressed people while being hosted comfortably inside the system crushing them. That is not compassion. That is not solidarity. It is performance. It is propaganda tourism. Cubans are not asking for luxury. They are not asking for pity. They are asking for freedom. And no staged event, no fake activism, and no polished propaganda trip is going to change that.
2:06

He was 5 years old when his parents had to make an unthinkable choice. Keep their son with them under communism. Or send him away alone so he could have a shot at freedom. That was Andy Garcia’s reality. And he was not the only one. Thousands of Cuban children were separated from their families because their parents knew what that system was doing. It was not just taking homes or businesses. It was trying to control people completely. Their future. Their beliefs. Their identity. Their freedom. Imagine being forced to choose between raising your child and saving your child. Some families reunited. A lot of them never did. Now look at Cuba today. Cubans are sitting in the dark without electricity. They are struggling to eat. They are in the streets banging pots because it is the only way left to make noise. And while that is happening, these activists fly in, sit in air conditioned buildings, speak into microphones, eat catered food, and call it solidarity. Give me a break. You cannot claim to stand with oppressed people while being hosted comfortably inside the system crushing them. That is not compassion. That is not solidarity. It is performance. It is propaganda tourism. Cubans are not asking for luxury. They are not asking for pity. They are asking for freedom. And no staged event, no fake activism, and no polished propaganda trip is going to change that.

Jammles

33,758 views • 4 months ago

Residents are outraged that their water will be given to a new Amazon 290 acre data center in Tucson Arizona You’re not going to believe this, sitting on their city council is the woman who worked on META’s data center team for the last 6 years. Now she’ll approve giving away residents water to this new data center They always put their people right where they need them to approve their projects
0:38

Residents are outraged that their water will be given to a new Amazon 290 acre data center in Tucson Arizona You’re not going to believe this, sitting on their city council is the woman who worked on META’s data center team for the last 6 years. Now she’ll approve giving away residents water to this new data center They always put their people right where they need them to approve their projects

Wall Street Apes

1,058,630 views • 11 months ago

🚨 WHAT HAPPENS IF EVERY CITY FOLLOWS? "Save our kids." That was the message coming from the streets of Liverpool. What should concern the political establishment is not the protest itself. It is the possibility that similar scenes begin appearing across Britain. Liverpool today. Glasgow tomorrow. The North East next week. For years, millions of people have raised concerns about immigration, crime, community cohesion and the future direction of the country. Many feel they were ignored. Others believe they were insulted, dismissed or branded extremists for daring to speak out. Now those concerns are moving beyond social media and into public demonstrations. The political class keeps hoping these are isolated incidents. But what if they are not? What if Liverpool is not the exception, but part of a much larger shift in public mood? Because once people begin taking to the streets in city after city, the question is no longer whether frustration exists. The question is how long politicians can continue pretending it doesn't.
0:35

🚨 WHAT HAPPENS IF EVERY CITY FOLLOWS? "Save our kids." That was the message coming from the streets of Liverpool. What should concern the political establishment is not the protest itself. It is the possibility that similar scenes begin appearing across Britain. Liverpool today. Glasgow tomorrow. The North East next week. For years, millions of people have raised concerns about immigration, crime, community cohesion and the future direction of the country. Many feel they were ignored. Others believe they were insulted, dismissed or branded extremists for daring to speak out. Now those concerns are moving beyond social media and into public demonstrations. The political class keeps hoping these are isolated incidents. But what if they are not? What if Liverpool is not the exception, but part of a much larger shift in public mood? Because once people begin taking to the streets in city after city, the question is no longer whether frustration exists. The question is how long politicians can continue pretending it doesn't.

Jim Ferguson

11,199 views • 1 month ago

Jews and Freemasons "They will not change historical facts!" Oh, but they did, and they got away with it for a very long time. It is still working on the majority. I know the suspicion of Hitler being a Freemason, and in many ways, I agree he probably was working with them, but his passion for nationalism is still remarkable. His words were still inspiring. They were still good. Orwell was right, in the time we are living in now, nothing is left of the old world. It has all be rewritten, repainted, renamed, or changed. Sometimes a painting of the slaying of a dragon is discovered in Italy. No one cares. No one wonders. No one tries to figure it out, but a small few and they are conspiracy theorists.
0:51

Jews and Freemasons "They will not change historical facts!" Oh, but they did, and they got away with it for a very long time. It is still working on the majority. I know the suspicion of Hitler being a Freemason, and in many ways, I agree he probably was working with them, but his passion for nationalism is still remarkable. His words were still inspiring. They were still good. Orwell was right, in the time we are living in now, nothing is left of the old world. It has all be rewritten, repainted, renamed, or changed. Sometimes a painting of the slaying of a dragon is discovered in Italy. No one cares. No one wonders. No one tries to figure it out, but a small few and they are conspiracy theorists.

Mofobian

10,605 views • 3 months ago

When the previous government cleared the Kolathur fish market, they at least provided alternative shops for the vendors. That showed some concern for the people whose livelihoods were affected. Nobody is saying rules shouldn't be followed. But can every single person survive without ever violating a rule? These roadside shops were not luxury businesses—they were the only source of income for poor and lower-middle-class families. If the decision is that there should be no roadside shops anymore, then what is the alternative for these families? How are they supposed to feed their children and run their homes? Governance is not just about clearing spaces; it's also about protecting livelihoods and showing humanity. #70FeetRoad #SaveSmallTraders #LivelihoodMatters
1:06

When the previous government cleared the Kolathur fish market, they at least provided alternative shops for the vendors. That showed some concern for the people whose livelihoods were affected. Nobody is saying rules shouldn't be followed. But can every single person survive without ever violating a rule? These roadside shops were not luxury businesses—they were the only source of income for poor and lower-middle-class families. If the decision is that there should be no roadside shops anymore, then what is the alternative for these families? How are they supposed to feed their children and run their homes? Governance is not just about clearing spaces; it's also about protecting livelihoods and showing humanity. #70FeetRoad #SaveSmallTraders #LivelihoodMatters

Citizen Saran

26,579 views • 1 month ago

🚨 QUESTIONS THAT DEMAND ANSWERS Eyewitnesses report that four armed police officers did not return fire while the terrorist attack was unfolding. That is not an accusation. It is a factual claim now circulating widely — and it requires clarity, not dismissal. Were officers instructed to hold fire? Were there command constraints in place? Were rules of engagement unclear in a live terror scenario? Was there fear of legal, political, or procedural repercussions? None of these questions diminish the bravery of officers who were injured. None of them undermine respect for policing. But public trust depends on transparency, not deflection. When civilians are slaughtered at a religious event, the public has a right to understand: how decisions were made who made them and whether those decisions prolonged the threat “Don’t speculate” is not an answer. A full, independent investigation is not optional — it is essential. Because if hesitation was imposed from above, then this is no longer just a policing question. It becomes a governance failure — and the public deserves the truth.
0:56

🚨 QUESTIONS THAT DEMAND ANSWERS Eyewitnesses report that four armed police officers did not return fire while the terrorist attack was unfolding. That is not an accusation. It is a factual claim now circulating widely — and it requires clarity, not dismissal. Were officers instructed to hold fire? Were there command constraints in place? Were rules of engagement unclear in a live terror scenario? Was there fear of legal, political, or procedural repercussions? None of these questions diminish the bravery of officers who were injured. None of them undermine respect for policing. But public trust depends on transparency, not deflection. When civilians are slaughtered at a religious event, the public has a right to understand: how decisions were made who made them and whether those decisions prolonged the threat “Don’t speculate” is not an answer. A full, independent investigation is not optional — it is essential. Because if hesitation was imposed from above, then this is no longer just a policing question. It becomes a governance failure — and the public deserves the truth.

Jim Ferguson

117,348 views • 7 months ago

Elon Musk just diagnosed the disease no one admits they have. Life has become a triage ward. Pay the bill. Dodge the crisis. Survive the week. Repeat until dead. Musk: “Life cannot just be about solving one miserable problem after another. That can’t be the only thing.” Most people can name every problem they are running from. They cannot name a single thing they are running toward. That is the disease. You did not lose your purpose. You replaced it with maintenance. Musk: “There need to be things that inspire you. That make you glad to wake up in the morning and be part of humanity.” Glad to be part of humanity. When was the last time you felt that. Not relief. Not distraction. Not the dull numbness of a weekend burning down to Sunday night. Actual gladness that you exist. Most people cannot answer that question. Not because the answer is painful. Because they have never been asked. We have spent decades staring at the floor. Sweeping the same dirt into the same corner of the same room. Musk quotes Tsiolkovsky: “Earth is the cradle of humanity, but you cannot stay in the cradle forever.” The cradle is warm. The cradle is safe. The cradle is small. And a species that refuses to leave it is not being cautious. It is dying slowly in the only room it has ever known. Musk: “It is time to go forth, become a starfaring civilization… and expand the scope and scale of human consciousness.” Look up tonight. Billions of galaxies. Trillions of stars. An ocean of light stretching 93 billion light years in every direction. And one tiny wet rock figured out how to wonder why it exists. We are not passengers on this planet. We are the universe waking up. And right now the only conscious thing in the universe is trapped in one room arguing about the electricity bill. The problems will never end. There will always be another fire. But you were not built to fight fires. The universe was dark for 13.8 billion years. Then it opened one eye. You.
0:31

Elon Musk just diagnosed the disease no one admits they have. Life has become a triage ward. Pay the bill. Dodge the crisis. Survive the week. Repeat until dead. Musk: “Life cannot just be about solving one miserable problem after another. That can’t be the only thing.” Most people can name every problem they are running from. They cannot name a single thing they are running toward. That is the disease. You did not lose your purpose. You replaced it with maintenance. Musk: “There need to be things that inspire you. That make you glad to wake up in the morning and be part of humanity.” Glad to be part of humanity. When was the last time you felt that. Not relief. Not distraction. Not the dull numbness of a weekend burning down to Sunday night. Actual gladness that you exist. Most people cannot answer that question. Not because the answer is painful. Because they have never been asked. We have spent decades staring at the floor. Sweeping the same dirt into the same corner of the same room. Musk quotes Tsiolkovsky: “Earth is the cradle of humanity, but you cannot stay in the cradle forever.” The cradle is warm. The cradle is safe. The cradle is small. And a species that refuses to leave it is not being cautious. It is dying slowly in the only room it has ever known. Musk: “It is time to go forth, become a starfaring civilization… and expand the scope and scale of human consciousness.” Look up tonight. Billions of galaxies. Trillions of stars. An ocean of light stretching 93 billion light years in every direction. And one tiny wet rock figured out how to wonder why it exists. We are not passengers on this planet. We are the universe waking up. And right now the only conscious thing in the universe is trapped in one room arguing about the electricity bill. The problems will never end. There will always be another fire. But you were not built to fight fires. The universe was dark for 13.8 billion years. Then it opened one eye. You.

Dustin

330,151 views • 3 months ago

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.
2:53

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Kirk Rollins

30,483 views • 1 month ago