Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dick Vermeil Self-esteem drives performance. Very few outperform how they feel about themselves. Confidence and self-esteem are different. Build the person - improve the player. R.A.P. Recognition. Appreciation. Praise. Praise must be earned. Critique must teach. Create an environment where people grow. Nobody is immune to tough days.

32,868 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The so-called self-esteem movement of the 1980s and 1990s largely backfired. It aimed to cultivate healthy confidence in children but often ended up encouraging narcissism instead. Rather than teaching kids to associate self-worth with effort and achievement, it showered them with indiscriminate praise—regardless of behavior or outcome. The result was less a boost in genuine self-esteem and more a rise in grandiose self-regard. Psychologist Roy Baumeister was one of the early critics of this movement. Today, his concerns are widely accepted, but several decades ago, there was a prevailing belief that high self-esteem caused success. Researchers noticed that accomplished students often reported feeling good about themselves, and from this correlation, many drew a faulty conclusion: If we can make children feel good about themselves, they’ll become more successful. But as we now understand, correlation doesn’t imply causation. When praise is tied to real effort or achievement—“You worked hard, and you did well”—children come to associate pride with meaningful accomplishments. But when praise is handed out indiscriminately, children may begin to feel good about themselves without doing anything to earn it. Over time, this fosters entitlement and an expectation of constant validation, rather than resilience or motivation. In short, the self-esteem movement didn’t just fail to deliver on its promises—it may have helped contribute to a rise in narcissism in young people.

Rob Henderson

138,329 views • 1 year ago

This is a really special interview for me. My guest Axel Honneth is one of my first teachers who made me fall in love with philosophy. In college, my biggest struggle was dealing with my own craving for external validation. I found myself racking up achievements I didn't need, to pursue careers I didn't want, all in order to impress people I didn't particularly like. When I realized this, I decided that I needed to be free from external validation altogether if I wanted to build a healthy self-esteem. So I deleted all of my social media. I moved to Nepal to practice in a Tibetan monastery: I was genuinely considering renouncing the world. Encountering Axel’s work saved me from this other extreme and made me realize I was operating under a false dichotomy. The way to build a healthy self-esteem is not by rejecting validation altogether, it is by gaining the right kind of external validation. The right question is not: “how do I stop caring what others think of me?” The right question is: “how, from whom, and when should I care?” That is what you will learn in this interview: how to stop living for others, and discover a life truly your own. But what moved me even more than Axel's ideas is who he is as a person. As one of the most important philosophers, he spent hours every month taking me 1-on-1 carefully through his works. His generosity showed me what a philosophical life was all about. This interview is special then because it gave me the opportunity almost a decade later to revisit the works that started my journey into philosophy. Timestamps: 2:52 All Struggles Are Struggles of Recognition 7:39 Not All Jobs Get Social Esteem 15:29 From Occupy Wall Street to Woke Capital 24:28 The ‘Self’ is a Product of Love 53:23 You Can Demand Rights, Not Esteem 1:20:39 Freedom Requires Recognition 1:35:55 The Overlegalization of America

Johnathan Bi

10,847 views • 6 months ago