Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Did a buried study just blow the lid off the vaccine program?” Inside the White House Briefing Room, LindellTV’s Cara Castronuova interviews Del Bigtree on what may be one of the most significant public health revelations in years. They discuss President Trump’s new executive order forcing pharmaceutical companies to...

RealLindellTV's profile picture

LindellTV

92,478 subscribers

74,323 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikBilim & TeknolojiEğitim
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Peter McCullough at the White House “The entire COVID-19 vaccine program is a fraud. The American people must wake up to this reality.” Once canceled, censored, and erased from YouTube for challenging the COVID narrative, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® is now speaking at the The White House with LindellTV's reporter, Cara Castronuova, and co-author John Leake. Dr. McCullough exposes the truth about the COVID vaccine program, Secretary Kennedy's new HHS.gov advisory panel, and the need to end censorship in medicine: “When I first testified in the U.S. Senate in 2020, we were scraped off YouTube. Five years later, it’s a new day...No one holds agency over the truth. Only through open discussion and debate can we protect public health.” Dr. McCullough and Leake also discuss their bestselling book Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality, why “trust the science” became a political slogan, and how America can reclaim medical freedom from Big Pharma’s grip. Del Bigtree The HighWire Children’s Health Defense The Gateway Pundit Aaron Siri Robert W Malone, MD ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Senator Ron Johnson Richard Blumenthal HHS.gov Secretary Kennedy Autism Capital 🧩 Elon Musk Autism Action Network Mary S. Holland, Esq. Rita Palma Teachers for Choice Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr. Andy Wakefield Jenny McC-Wahlberg Stefanie Spear Senator Ron Johnson Thomas Massie Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
26:21

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Peter McCullough at the White House “The entire COVID-19 vaccine program is a fraud. The American people must wake up to this reality.” Once canceled, censored, and erased from YouTube for challenging the COVID narrative, Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® is now speaking at the The White House with LindellTV's reporter, Cara Castronuova, and co-author John Leake. Dr. McCullough exposes the truth about the COVID vaccine program, Secretary Kennedy's new HHS.gov advisory panel, and the need to end censorship in medicine: “When I first testified in the U.S. Senate in 2020, we were scraped off YouTube. Five years later, it’s a new day...No one holds agency over the truth. Only through open discussion and debate can we protect public health.” Dr. McCullough and Leake also discuss their bestselling book Vaccines: Mythology, Ideology, and Reality, why “trust the science” became a political slogan, and how America can reclaim medical freedom from Big Pharma’s grip. Del Bigtree The HighWire Children’s Health Defense The Gateway Pundit Aaron Siri Robert W Malone, MD ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Senator Ron Johnson Richard Blumenthal HHS.gov Secretary Kennedy Autism Capital 🧩 Elon Musk Autism Action Network Mary S. Holland, Esq. Rita Palma Teachers for Choice Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® Dr. Andy Wakefield Jenny McC-Wahlberg Stefanie Spear Senator Ron Johnson Thomas Massie Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

LindellTV

72,363 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.
4:44

🚨MAJOR: For YEARS we’ve been clamoring for a true study comparing vaxxed children to unvaxxed children to measure health outcomes. Vaccine proponents DID that study from 2016-2020 and BURIED IT. But, ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network, The HighWire and Del Bigtree in partnership with Senator Ron Johnson now HAVE the results. MUST WATCH.

Tracy Beanz

77,344 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
2:02

The Most Important Vaccine Safety Study Ever Suppressed. Henry Ford Vaxxed vs. Unvaxxed Study: Vaccinated Kids Had 453% More Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases of brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities or tics. Soon To Be Released..."Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short- and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study" ICAN lead counsel Aaron Siri, Esq. revealed the results of an unpublished study from Michigan’s Henry Ford Health System. The study was done by infectious disease physician, Dr Marcus Zervos, MD. In 2016, journalist Del Bigtree issued a challenge to the head of infectious disease at one of the most prestigious medical institutions in the world: conduct the most thorough vaxxed vs. unvaxxed study that has ever been done. The expert, Dr Marcus Zervos MD, took up the challenge and ran the study to prove Del wrong. What the study revealed was so horrifying that it was locked away, hidden from the public...until now. Henry Ford birth cohort (n=18,468) tracked children from birth for 10 years. The Study Found... -4.29 times the rate of asthma -3.03 times the rate of atopic disease -5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease -5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders which included 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder and 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay. Notably, the study also found the following: -Brain Dysfunction: 8 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Diabetes: 42 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -ADHD: 262 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Behavioral Disability: 165 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Learning Disability: 65 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Intellectual Disability: 5 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Tics: 46 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated -Other Psychological Disability 9 in the vaccinated group and 0 in the unvaccinated 👇An Inconvenient Study: Premieres October 3👇 👇Figure #1 From The Unpublished Study👇 👇Vaccinated Study By Hooker & Miller👇 Credits: ICAN - Informed Consent Action Network Del Bigtree Aaron Siri Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® McCullough Foundation Senator Ron Johnson The HighWire Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

Valerie Anne Smith

87,981 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Del Bigtree Exposes New Attempt to Silence Vaccine Safety Investigation Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS). In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried. He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed. Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide. Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials. This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.
9:51

Del Bigtree Exposes New Attempt to Silence Vaccine Safety Investigation Del Bigtree, host of The High Wire and producer of the controversial documentary VAXXED, is facing renewed censorship efforts—this time from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS). In a powerful new segment, Bigtree reveals that HFHS has sent a cease-and-desist letter, threatening defamation lawsuits over his new film, An Inconvenient Study. The film investigates an unpublished HFHS study that compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. The health system claims the study was shelved due to "significant flaws in its data and methodology," not because of its results. Bigtree counters this, presenting a compelling case that the study's findings—which allegedly show increased rates of chronic disease, neurological disorders, and asthma in vaccinated children—are the true reason it was buried. He argues that had the results been reversed, glorifying vaccines, the study would have been "rushed to print" as definitive proof of vaccine safety. Instead, it joins at least seven other similar vaxxed/unvaxxed studies that have been suppressed. Bigtree connects this to a long-standing pattern: his work on VAXXED and his early COVID-19 reporting on lab origins, mask inefficacy, and lockdown harms were all met with fierce attacks and platform censorship. Yet, each time, the controversy only amplified his message, growing his audience from hundreds of thousands to millions worldwide. Standing firm in his commitment to medical transparency, Bigtree premiered a new trailer for An Inconvenient Study, featuring never-before-seen hidden camera footage of his conversations with HFHS officials. This is more than a movie; it's a front line in the battle for medical freedom and free speech.

Camus

11,213 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations Del Bigtree, a fierce advocate for medical freedom, recently shared a chilling revelation from his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During Donald Trump’s first term, Kennedy was tasked with confronting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about vaccine safety. Bigtree accompanied him, armed with critical questions. What they uncovered was staggering: the NIH admitted they do not conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the gold standard for safety testing—for childhood vaccines. Why? They claim it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines from a placebo group. When pressed further, Bigtree and Kennedy asked for a retrospective study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations using the NIH’s vast database of millions. The response? “We can’t figure out how to do that study.” This excuse baffled Bigtree, as comparative studies are the backbone of science. How could the NIH, with all its resources, claim such a study is impossible? A year later, at an event with pro-vaccine advocate Paul Offit, Bigtree got clarity. Offit dismissed the idea of a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, citing “confounding factors.” The unvaccinated, Offit argued, are likely healthier not because they avoid vaccines, but because they live differently—avoiding tap water, processed foods, or even airport scanners. In other words, the NIH has likely conducted these studies, but the results don’t fit their narrative: unvaccinated individuals are consistently healthier, with lower rates of autism, cancer, and other chronic conditions. This realization exposed a disturbing truth: the medical establishment prioritizes the sick over the healthy. Instead of studying why unvaccinated populations thrive, they dismiss them as outliers and double down on vaccinating everyone—regardless of the consequences. Bigtree passionately argues this approach poisons healthy individuals, destroys gut biomes, and undermines natural immunity, all to prop up a system that profits from perpetual illness. “They’re attacking the healthy to protect the sick,” Bigtree declared. “My kids are thriving without your injections, and I’ll fight to my last breath to keep your poisons away from them.” This is a call to action: demand transparency, reject coerced medical interventions, and protect our children’s health.
3:31

The Vaccine Safety Scandal: Why the NIH Refuses to Compare Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Populations Del Bigtree, a fierce advocate for medical freedom, recently shared a chilling revelation from his work with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. During Donald Trump’s first term, Kennedy was tasked with confronting the National Institutes of Health (NIH) about vaccine safety. Bigtree accompanied him, armed with critical questions. What they uncovered was staggering: the NIH admitted they do not conduct double-blind, placebo-controlled trials—the gold standard for safety testing—for childhood vaccines. Why? They claim it’s “unethical” to withhold vaccines from a placebo group. When pressed further, Bigtree and Kennedy asked for a retrospective study comparing health outcomes in vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations using the NIH’s vast database of millions. The response? “We can’t figure out how to do that study.” This excuse baffled Bigtree, as comparative studies are the backbone of science. How could the NIH, with all its resources, claim such a study is impossible? A year later, at an event with pro-vaccine advocate Paul Offit, Bigtree got clarity. Offit dismissed the idea of a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study, citing “confounding factors.” The unvaccinated, Offit argued, are likely healthier not because they avoid vaccines, but because they live differently—avoiding tap water, processed foods, or even airport scanners. In other words, the NIH has likely conducted these studies, but the results don’t fit their narrative: unvaccinated individuals are consistently healthier, with lower rates of autism, cancer, and other chronic conditions. This realization exposed a disturbing truth: the medical establishment prioritizes the sick over the healthy. Instead of studying why unvaccinated populations thrive, they dismiss them as outliers and double down on vaccinating everyone—regardless of the consequences. Bigtree passionately argues this approach poisons healthy individuals, destroys gut biomes, and undermines natural immunity, all to prop up a system that profits from perpetual illness. “They’re attacking the healthy to protect the sick,” Bigtree declared. “My kids are thriving without your injections, and I’ll fight to my last breath to keep your poisons away from them.” This is a call to action: demand transparency, reject coerced medical interventions, and protect our children’s health.

Camus

42,611 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.
7:02

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

Camus

46,117 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Del Bigtree Exposes “Molecular Mimicry” – The Tragic Mistake of the Vaccine Era What if the immune system has been taught to attack the body itself? In a striking on-stage demonstration, Del Bigtree laid out one of the most disturbing vaccine mechanisms now emerging in medical literature: cell mimicry. Using simple props, he illustrated how injected mRNA instructs human cells to produce spike proteins that resemble the virus — but not perfectly. When killer T-cells target these vaccine-made proteins, they may also begin to mistake similar-looking features on human tissue — such as heart cells — for the enemy. This, Bigtree explained, could help explain why journals like Circulation are now acknowledging the risk of an autoimmune response targeting the heart itself. If T-cells can no longer tell “self” from “non-self,” a cascade of chronic illness may follow — myocarditis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and more. Bigtree argued that without long-term placebo trials, regulators missed the silent rise of immune confusion — creating what he calls the “autoimmune crisis of our lifetime.” With over half of American children now suffering chronic diseases, he insists only one study could still reveal the truth: the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison. Bigtree then turned to the suppressed Henry Ford Health Study, which reportedly found dramatically higher rates of illness among vaccinated children. According to him, the results were buried — labeled “unworthy” of publication for failing to meet “scientific standards.” The footage from that investigation will appear in Bigtree’s forthcoming film, An Inconvenient Study — a direct challenge to the vaccine establishment’s refusal to confront its own data. This is not just about one vaccine. It’s about whether an entire generation’s immune systems are being rewritten — permanently.
7:55

Del Bigtree Exposes “Molecular Mimicry” – The Tragic Mistake of the Vaccine Era What if the immune system has been taught to attack the body itself? In a striking on-stage demonstration, Del Bigtree laid out one of the most disturbing vaccine mechanisms now emerging in medical literature: cell mimicry. Using simple props, he illustrated how injected mRNA instructs human cells to produce spike proteins that resemble the virus — but not perfectly. When killer T-cells target these vaccine-made proteins, they may also begin to mistake similar-looking features on human tissue — such as heart cells — for the enemy. This, Bigtree explained, could help explain why journals like Circulation are now acknowledging the risk of an autoimmune response targeting the heart itself. If T-cells can no longer tell “self” from “non-self,” a cascade of chronic illness may follow — myocarditis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, and more. Bigtree argued that without long-term placebo trials, regulators missed the silent rise of immune confusion — creating what he calls the “autoimmune crisis of our lifetime.” With over half of American children now suffering chronic diseases, he insists only one study could still reveal the truth: the vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparison. Bigtree then turned to the suppressed Henry Ford Health Study, which reportedly found dramatically higher rates of illness among vaccinated children. According to him, the results were buried — labeled “unworthy” of publication for failing to meet “scientific standards.” The footage from that investigation will appear in Bigtree’s forthcoming film, An Inconvenient Study — a direct challenge to the vaccine establishment’s refusal to confront its own data. This is not just about one vaccine. It’s about whether an entire generation’s immune systems are being rewritten — permanently.

Camus

15,710 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

In a recent interview with Alex Jones, Del Bigtree, producer of the documentary "Vaxxed," shared insights from an unpublished study conducted by Henry Ford Health System. The research, led by Dr. Matthew Zervos—a proponent of vaccination—involved data from 18,000 children and aimed to examine health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Key findings from the study include a 2.5 times higher rate of chronic diseases among vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated ones, and six times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group. Projections through age 10 suggested that 57% of vaccinated children in the sample had developed a chronic condition, versus 17% in the unvaccinated group. Bigtree noted that these results align with patterns observed in other vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated studies, such as those by Dr. Anthony Mawson on homeschool families and Dr. Paul Thomas from his pediatric practice. He highlighted anecdotal reports from parents describing rapid changes in their children's development following vaccinations, often within days of the third dose around 18 months. When asked why the study hasn't been published, Dr. Zervos reportedly cited concerns over data quality. Bigtree emphasized the film's role as an accessible resource for discussing these topics with others, and praised the ongoing work of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in advocating for further research and transparency. This conversation underscores the value of independent studies in public health discussions. What are your thoughts on exploring more vaxxed/unvaxxed comparisons?
2:54

In a recent interview with Alex Jones, Del Bigtree, producer of the documentary "Vaxxed," shared insights from an unpublished study conducted by Henry Ford Health System. The research, led by Dr. Matthew Zervos—a proponent of vaccination—involved data from 18,000 children and aimed to examine health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. Key findings from the study include a 2.5 times higher rate of chronic diseases among vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated ones, and six times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders in the vaccinated group. Projections through age 10 suggested that 57% of vaccinated children in the sample had developed a chronic condition, versus 17% in the unvaccinated group. Bigtree noted that these results align with patterns observed in other vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated studies, such as those by Dr. Anthony Mawson on homeschool families and Dr. Paul Thomas from his pediatric practice. He highlighted anecdotal reports from parents describing rapid changes in their children's development following vaccinations, often within days of the third dose around 18 months. When asked why the study hasn't been published, Dr. Zervos reportedly cited concerns over data quality. Bigtree emphasized the film's role as an accessible resource for discussing these topics with others, and praised the ongoing work of figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in advocating for further research and transparency. This conversation underscores the value of independent studies in public health discussions. What are your thoughts on exploring more vaxxed/unvaxxed comparisons?

Camus

27,528 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."
3:44

The Inconvenient Truth: Suppressed Data Shows Vaccinated Cohort Far Sicker Than Unvaccinated Del Bigtree reveals a hidden-camera investigation into a suppressed study from Henry Ford Health, with allegations so explosive the filmmakers are now facing a cease-and-desist. The study compared health outcomes in children. The results were the inverse of the public health narrative. The data allegedly showed the vaccinated cohort had a 250% increased rate of chronic disease and 6 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders. Bigtree states: "Had it been the unvaccinated with those rates... they would have rushed this to publication. It would have been the biggest headline across the world." But it wasn't. The findings were allegedly buried because they revealed the opposite of what the pharmaceutical industry wants us to believe. The investigation points to the study's lead, Dr. Marcus Zervos—a world-renowned virologist who led Moderna's trials for the institution. On camera, he reportedly affirms the study's validity, saying, "It's a good study. I would publish it as it is, but I'm worried about losing my job." Henry Ford Health claims the study wasn't published due to poor scientific rigor, not the results. This fuels Bigtree's central question: "If vaccines are making our kids healthier, we need proof of that right now. Show us the study where the vaccinated have lower rates of autism, lower rates of ADHD... then I won't have anything I can say." "Why has no government in the world ever done that study?" Bigtree asks. "They've never been able to prove that the vaccinated are healthier. They can't do that study. That should scare the hell out of everyone in the world right now with children."

Camus

28,429 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 500% Higher Autism-Related Outcomes. Same Result Across All 12 Studies. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, joins Del Bigtree to break down a peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study featured in An Inconvenient Study. In the original Henry Ford analysis, a result for autism was unclear. One potential reason, according to Hulscher, is that the researchers looked only for a narrow autism diagnosis code. That would miss how autism actually shows up in medical records. Children on the autism spectrum are often diagnosed under related categories like speech disorders, ADHD, learning disabilities, and tics. When those autism-related diagnoses were grouped together to reflect real clinical practice, the signal became clear to Hulscher. Autism-related outcomes were about 500% more likely, roughly a fivefold increase, in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children. This finding does not stand alone. There are now 12 independent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data sets, and every single one shows the same pattern. Higher rates of chronic and neurodevelopmental conditions in vaccinated groups, with no study showing better overall health outcomes for the vaccinated. See full conversation here:
2:36

🚨 500% Higher Autism-Related Outcomes. Same Result Across All 12 Studies. Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, joins Del Bigtree to break down a peer-reviewed reanalysis of the Henry Ford vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study featured in An Inconvenient Study. In the original Henry Ford analysis, a result for autism was unclear. One potential reason, according to Hulscher, is that the researchers looked only for a narrow autism diagnosis code. That would miss how autism actually shows up in medical records. Children on the autism spectrum are often diagnosed under related categories like speech disorders, ADHD, learning disabilities, and tics. When those autism-related diagnoses were grouped together to reflect real clinical practice, the signal became clear to Hulscher. Autism-related outcomes were about 500% more likely, roughly a fivefold increase, in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated children. This finding does not stand alone. There are now 12 independent vaccinated vs. unvaccinated data sets, and every single one shows the same pattern. Higher rates of chronic and neurodevelopmental conditions in vaccinated groups, with no study showing better overall health outcomes for the vaccinated. See full conversation here:

An Inconvenient Study

19,266 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

BREAKING: Del Bigtree and ICAN Announce Major Lawsuit Against the CDC to Expose Hidden Vaccine Safety Data Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), just dropped a bombshell on The HighWire: a groundbreaking lawsuit targeting the CDC to unlock the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, a massive database tracking vaccine safety for millions of Americans. This isn’t just a legal fight; it’s a battle for truth, transparency, and the right of every citizen to know what’s in the vaccines they’re told are safe and effective. The VSD, established in 1990, compiles electronic health records from 11 major healthcare organizations nationwide. With over 359 studies in PubMed (as of Sept 2024) relying on its data, it’s a cornerstone of vaccine safety monitoring. But here’s the catch: years ago, after independent scientists used VSD data to publish studies raising concerns about vaccine risks, the CDC quietly moved the VSD outside government control, seemingly to dodge Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Since then, access has been tightly restricted, leaving the public and most scientists in the dark. Bigtree is calling this moveව Black and white photo of a person standing in front of a brick wallBigtree is calling this move a deliberate attempt to hide critical data from the American people. He declared that they want the VSD not just available, they want it public. Any scientist, anywhere, should be able to say, I want to check your work. Show me the Pfizer data. Show me the COVID vaccine injury reports. Prove it’s safe. The stakes are high: without access, how can we trust claims about vaccine safety? How can we understand the injuries reported in hearings like Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent sessions? This lawsuit is personal for Bigtree, who played a key role in securing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as HHS Secretary. Now, he’s stepping back to focus on this fight, even if it means challenging allies in government. He said he’s hitting this from all sides, vowing to make the VSD accessible forever, not just for the next two years, but for all time. Why does this matter? Because the VSD holds answers. Answers about vaccine injuries. Answers about how safety is determined. Answers the public deserves. Right now, Bigtree says, it’s being hidden from us. That’s why so many are being injured. This legal battle could be long, but it’s historic. It’s a test of what happens when citizens demand accountability from their own government, even when friends are in high places. Bigtree invites you to join the experiment: follow this lawsuit, share this post, and demand vaccine transparency.
2:22

BREAKING: Del Bigtree and ICAN Announce Major Lawsuit Against the CDC to Expose Hidden Vaccine Safety Data Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), just dropped a bombshell on The HighWire: a groundbreaking lawsuit targeting the CDC to unlock the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, a massive database tracking vaccine safety for millions of Americans. This isn’t just a legal fight; it’s a battle for truth, transparency, and the right of every citizen to know what’s in the vaccines they’re told are safe and effective. The VSD, established in 1990, compiles electronic health records from 11 major healthcare organizations nationwide. With over 359 studies in PubMed (as of Sept 2024) relying on its data, it’s a cornerstone of vaccine safety monitoring. But here’s the catch: years ago, after independent scientists used VSD data to publish studies raising concerns about vaccine risks, the CDC quietly moved the VSD outside government control, seemingly to dodge Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Since then, access has been tightly restricted, leaving the public and most scientists in the dark. Bigtree is calling this moveව Black and white photo of a person standing in front of a brick wallBigtree is calling this move a deliberate attempt to hide critical data from the American people. He declared that they want the VSD not just available, they want it public. Any scientist, anywhere, should be able to say, I want to check your work. Show me the Pfizer data. Show me the COVID vaccine injury reports. Prove it’s safe. The stakes are high: without access, how can we trust claims about vaccine safety? How can we understand the injuries reported in hearings like Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent sessions? This lawsuit is personal for Bigtree, who played a key role in securing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as HHS Secretary. Now, he’s stepping back to focus on this fight, even if it means challenging allies in government. He said he’s hitting this from all sides, vowing to make the VSD accessible forever, not just for the next two years, but for all time. Why does this matter? Because the VSD holds answers. Answers about vaccine injuries. Answers about how safety is determined. Answers the public deserves. Right now, Bigtree says, it’s being hidden from us. That’s why so many are being injured. This legal battle could be long, but it’s historic. It’s a test of what happens when citizens demand accountability from their own government, even when friends are in high places. Bigtree invites you to join the experiment: follow this lawsuit, share this post, and demand vaccine transparency.

Camus

35,630 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.
4:06

My God… what have they done💔 🚨 Impact of Childhood Vaccination on Short and Long-Term Chronic Health Outcomes in Children: A Birth Cohort Study • Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree met with Dr. Zervos, a pro-vaccine researcher involved in clinical trials, to propose a study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. • The study was a large-scale analysis of children enrolled at Henry Ford Medical Center from 2000 to 2016, tracked from birth onward. • The study compared unvaccinated children to those who received one or more of the Childhood vaccines, using actual medical records for data. 🔻 Unvaccinated Children: - ZERO Brain dysfunction - ZERO diabetes - ZERO behavioral problems - ZERO learning disabilities - ZERO intellectual disabilities - ZERO tics - ZERO psychological disabilities 🔻 Vaccinated Children: • Asthma: 4.29 times higher in vaccinated children. •• Acute and chronic Ear Infections: 600% more likely with a vaccinated child ••• Atopic disease: 3.03 times higher. •••• Autoimmune disease: 5.96 times higher •••••Neurological Disorders: 300-616% increase in vaccinated children — ADHD, Autism, Behavioral Disability, Developmental Delay, Learning Disability, Intellectual Disability, Speech Disorder 🔻 The study was never published because its findings contradicted the prevailing narrative that vaccines are universally safe. Dr. Zervos and the research team refused to publish due to concerns about job security and making doctors uncomfortable, despite acknowledging the study’s findings.

MJTruthUltra

641,817 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”
4:07

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,534,735 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇
17:52

REPORT: A buried study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children has finally come to light—and the results are shattering the vaccine narrative. Featured in Del Bigtree’s new film An Inconvenient Study ( this long-suppressed data reveals what public health agencies have refused to examine for decades: vaccinated children suffer dramatically higher rates of chronic illness. Led by Dr. Marcus Zervos of Henry Ford Health, the study found vaccinated kids were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma, nearly six times more likely to develop autoimmune disorders, and over five times more likely to suffer neurodevelopmental issues. Among nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, learning disabilities, or behavioral disorders. When confronted with the findings, Dr. Zervos admitted on hidden camera, “Publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.” This could be the biggest medical cover-up of our time. See the data for yourself in 's explosive report. Watch the full episode:👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

64,520 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?
1:07

A suppressed study, hidden from the public, reveals a devastating truth the establishment never wanted you to hear. According to children's health advocate Mary Holland, a pivotal hearing uncovered an unpublished study from the Henry Ford Center in Detroit. Conducted explicitly to PROVE vaccinated children are healthier, the results instead showed the opposite. The findings? Vaccinated children are two and a half times more likely to suffer from a chronic disease. This includes: - Autism - Asthma - ADHD - Severe Allergies This critical data was never published. It was brought to light by legal experts and presented by Senator Ron Johnson, who is now blowing the whistle on this concealment. We are at the beginning of a global reckoning. For decades, the explosive rise in chronic childhood illness has paralleled the explosive rise of the vaccine schedule. The plausible connection is now more than plausible—it is supported by their own suppressed research. The truth is finally coming out. The question is, will you listen?

Camus

112,017 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.
14:19

A recent hearing chaired by Senator Ron Johnson brought significant attention to an unpublished study conducted by the Henry Ford Health System, led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, the head of infectious diseases. The study, which compared health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated children, has become a central point of controversy. Following the hearing, Henry Ford Health System pushed back, stating the study draft faced significant peer review concerns and serious data flaws, and that the institution was unaware the rejected draft was being discussed. Critics, including a Washington Post journalist, have echoed these concerns, labeling the research as commissioned by an "anti-vaccine group" and highlighting methodological issues. However, defenders of the study offer counterarguments to the criticism: - They assert the study was not "commissioned" but was a challenge to Dr. Zervos to prove the safety of the vaccine schedule. - They claim no formal peer review was ever conducted on the completed study. - They argue that while the unvaccinated cohort was smaller, its size was statistically significant for comparison. - They contend that sensitivity analyses—which limited data to one year, three years, and five years—consistently showed worse health outcomes in the vaccinated group, with the results becoming more pronounced over time. The core finding of the study indicates vaccinated children were 2.5 times more likely to develop a chronic disease. Defenders of the research argue that the study's design mirrors the CDC's own recommended blueprint for such comparative safety studies and question why a major health institution would bury concerning results rather than address the alleged flaws and publish. This incident is framed as part of a larger pattern where a comprehensive vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study is avoided by public health authorities. A forthcoming documentary, An Inconvenient Study, promises to explore the entire episode in detail.

Camus

33,372 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.
7:58

Del Bigtree Exposes the Cumulative Lie of "Rare" Vaccine Injuries The largest COVID vaccine study ever, covering 99 million people, confirmed what Del Bigtree and ICAN have long asserted: the shots are linked to increased risks of severe disorders. The media was quick to label these injuries as "rare." But what does "rare" actually mean? As Del Bigtree highlights, the study reveals a shocking reality: • A 378% increased risk of brain and spinal cord swelling. • A 286% increased risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome (paralysis). • A 610% increased risk of myocarditis. The critical question no one in the media is asking: If each of these individual risks is "rare," what is the cumulative risk when you add them all together? And then multiply that by multiple doses? This COVID vaccine data, as Del Bigtree explains, is a mirror held up to a much larger, silent public health crisis: the entire childhood vaccine schedule. A shocking truth, uncovered by ICAN through FOIA requests and lawsuits: None of the 14 routine vaccines on the CDC's schedule—given in roughly 72 doses—were ever tested in long-term, double-blind, placebo-based safety trials prior to licensure. The foundational science to declare them "safe" simply does not exist. Every vaccine carries a manufacturer-inserted list of potential side effects, stipulated by the FDA because there is a "reasonable belief" they are causally related. For example, the Hepatitis B vaccine given on a baby's first day of life lists nearly 50 potential adverse events, including paralysis, brain swelling, and autoimmune disorders. Its pre-licensing safety study? Just four days long, with no placebo group. The argument is always that these events are "rare." But how rare is it when you multiply ~50 potential adverse events across 72 doses? Del Bigtree points to the devastating data. In the 1980s, when the schedule contained about 11 doses, the chronic childhood illness rate was 12.8%. Today, after the schedule exploded to 72 doses, that rate—encompassing neurological and autoimmune diseases—has skyrocketed to 54%. This is the greatest decline in public health in human history. The "rare" neurological disorders identified in the COVID study (3-6x increased risk) mirror the explosion in conditions like autism, which now affects an estimated 1 in 35 children. The takeaway, as Del Bigtree powerfully states, is undeniable. Vaccine injury is not a myth; it is a documented, quantifiable reality. The conversation must no longer be if it happens, but how much risk is acceptable, and when will we demand the rigorous safety science the public has been denied for decades. The health of millions of children depends on it.

Camus

52,491 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Del Bigtree Exposes the Lack of Placebo Trials in FDA-Licensed Vaccines In a powerful and unflinching monologue, Del Bigtree issues a direct challenge to the medical establishment and calls for a new era of public scrutiny. He urges everyone to bypass the experts and see the evidence for themselves. Del Bigtree: "I'm telling you right now, just type in 'FDA licensed vaccines' on their website. Go to section 6.1 on every single vaccine insert. Look what it says about the placebo trials. They never did one. Not on any of the childhood vaccines." He argues that this critical information was hidden from the public, negating any possibility of true informed consent. This foundational claim is the bedrock of his larger accusation: that we have been systematically lied to by the very agencies tasked with protecting our health. Del Bigtree: "Tony Fauci lied about six-foot distancing. Everyone at the CDC lied, as Robert Kennedy Jr. clearly showed, about the COVID vaccine stopping transmission. Remember 'it stops with you'? Bull crap. We know it doesn't. The FDA has already admitted it." His solution? A radical shift away from blind trust. "Do not trust experts any longer. We've been lied to long enough... You have got to start asking people to show their work. You've got to see the evidence." But this isn't just about criticism; it's about revelation. Bigtree teases a groundbreaking new study—the "vaxxed vs. unvaxxed" research he has long championed. He claims to have partnered with a skeptic who wanted to prove him wrong, promising to accept whatever the results showed on one condition: that it be published. Del Bigtree: "Wait till you see how bad it is when you do this study the right way, even when you try to prove us wrong. The movie about this study is 'An Inconvenient Study.' And boy, is it inconvenient." He positions this coming evidence as a turning point, a moment of reckoning for the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and every official who has ever been part of what he calls "covering up the real science." Del Bigtree: "We're not going to take it anymore. And now we've got evidence like they have never, ever had before—made possible by you." The call to action is clear. Look up the inserts. Question the narrative. Demand the evidence. The era of blind trust is over.
3:07

Del Bigtree Exposes the Lack of Placebo Trials in FDA-Licensed Vaccines In a powerful and unflinching monologue, Del Bigtree issues a direct challenge to the medical establishment and calls for a new era of public scrutiny. He urges everyone to bypass the experts and see the evidence for themselves. Del Bigtree: "I'm telling you right now, just type in 'FDA licensed vaccines' on their website. Go to section 6.1 on every single vaccine insert. Look what it says about the placebo trials. They never did one. Not on any of the childhood vaccines." He argues that this critical information was hidden from the public, negating any possibility of true informed consent. This foundational claim is the bedrock of his larger accusation: that we have been systematically lied to by the very agencies tasked with protecting our health. Del Bigtree: "Tony Fauci lied about six-foot distancing. Everyone at the CDC lied, as Robert Kennedy Jr. clearly showed, about the COVID vaccine stopping transmission. Remember 'it stops with you'? Bull crap. We know it doesn't. The FDA has already admitted it." His solution? A radical shift away from blind trust. "Do not trust experts any longer. We've been lied to long enough... You have got to start asking people to show their work. You've got to see the evidence." But this isn't just about criticism; it's about revelation. Bigtree teases a groundbreaking new study—the "vaxxed vs. unvaxxed" research he has long championed. He claims to have partnered with a skeptic who wanted to prove him wrong, promising to accept whatever the results showed on one condition: that it be published. Del Bigtree: "Wait till you see how bad it is when you do this study the right way, even when you try to prove us wrong. The movie about this study is 'An Inconvenient Study.' And boy, is it inconvenient." He positions this coming evidence as a turning point, a moment of reckoning for the pharmaceutical industry, regulatory agencies, and every official who has ever been part of what he calls "covering up the real science." Del Bigtree: "We're not going to take it anymore. And now we've got evidence like they have never, ever had before—made possible by you." The call to action is clear. Look up the inserts. Question the narrative. Demand the evidence. The era of blind trust is over.

Camus

117,921 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

NEW ACIP members rattling Big Pharma. 🔥 BREAKING: Inventor of mRNA technology and Dr. kicked off Twitter for warning parents about injecting their children with mRNA technology, just got named by HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy as one of the 8 x NEW members of ACIP, that will oversee vaccine recommendations. RFK Jr said the new "slate includes highly credentialed scientists, leading public-health experts, and some of America’s most accomplished physicians" HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy added: "Robert W. Malone, MD, is a physician-scientist and biochemist known for his early contributions to mRNA vaccine technology. He conducted foundational research in the late 1980s on lipid-mediated mRNA delivery, which laid the groundwork for later developments in mRNA-based therapeutics. Dr. Malone has held academic positions at institutions including the University of California, Davis, and the University of Maryland, and has served in advisory roles for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense. His expertise spans molecular biology, immunology, and vaccine development." Dr Robert Malone risked his reputation to protect children and babies from the dangers of mRNA technology. MAHA in WINNING 🔥
2:17

NEW ACIP members rattling Big Pharma. 🔥 BREAKING: Inventor of mRNA technology and Dr. kicked off Twitter for warning parents about injecting their children with mRNA technology, just got named by HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy as one of the 8 x NEW members of ACIP, that will oversee vaccine recommendations. RFK Jr said the new "slate includes highly credentialed scientists, leading public-health experts, and some of America’s most accomplished physicians" HHS Sec. Robert F Kennedy added: "Robert W. Malone, MD, is a physician-scientist and biochemist known for his early contributions to mRNA vaccine technology. He conducted foundational research in the late 1980s on lipid-mediated mRNA delivery, which laid the groundwork for later developments in mRNA-based therapeutics. Dr. Malone has held academic positions at institutions including the University of California, Davis, and the University of Maryland, and has served in advisory roles for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense. His expertise spans molecular biology, immunology, and vaccine development." Dr Robert Malone risked his reputation to protect children and babies from the dangers of mRNA technology. MAHA in WINNING 🔥

Humanspective

198,401 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Aaron Siri dismantles the absurdity of our public health agencies' inaction on a fundamental question: Is the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule actually safe? The Institute of Medicine (IOM) literally asked this question in a report paid for by HHS. Their conclusion? “We could not find one study that compared vaccinated to unvaccinated children.” Let that sink in. The official conclusion was not that the schedule is safe, but that they could find no evidence to answer the question of its overall safety. But here’s the kicker: the IOM report explicitly stated this crucial study could be done. They pointed to the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database with over 11 million health records that includes "thousands of completely unvaccinated kids." That was in 2013. So what did the CDC do? They spent a million dollars of taxpayer money—not on the study—but on a white paper to figure out how to do the study. A million dollars for a plan on a study design that any competent researcher could outline in an afternoon. That white paper came out in 2015. It has now been TEN YEARS since the IOM told them how to get the answer. A decade. The most damning question: If they had conducted this simple study and it confirmed the schedule's safety, wouldn't they have published it immediately to silence all critics? The fact that it remains buried is perhaps the most telling result of all. They have the money. They have the manpower. They have the data. They have had a decade. What are they afraid of finding?
2:08

Aaron Siri dismantles the absurdity of our public health agencies' inaction on a fundamental question: Is the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule actually safe? The Institute of Medicine (IOM) literally asked this question in a report paid for by HHS. Their conclusion? “We could not find one study that compared vaccinated to unvaccinated children.” Let that sink in. The official conclusion was not that the schedule is safe, but that they could find no evidence to answer the question of its overall safety. But here’s the kicker: the IOM report explicitly stated this crucial study could be done. They pointed to the CDC’s own Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a database with over 11 million health records that includes "thousands of completely unvaccinated kids." That was in 2013. So what did the CDC do? They spent a million dollars of taxpayer money—not on the study—but on a white paper to figure out how to do the study. A million dollars for a plan on a study design that any competent researcher could outline in an afternoon. That white paper came out in 2015. It has now been TEN YEARS since the IOM told them how to get the answer. A decade. The most damning question: If they had conducted this simple study and it confirmed the schedule's safety, wouldn't they have published it immediately to silence all critics? The fact that it remains buried is perhaps the most telling result of all. They have the money. They have the manpower. They have the data. They have had a decade. What are they afraid of finding?

Camus

25,697 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce