Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Digital Foundry Confirms: The Switch 2 Display is complete Dog Shit, from beginning to end. They claim: "SWITCH 2 Display is Worst than Base SWITCH 1 Display " "Display easily scratches due to plastic coating" " LCD Blur is very apparent and creates ghosting like images compared to the...

51,854 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

WolverinePS5's profile picture
WolverinePS51 year ago

This is what Nintendo fanboys caused by cheering for Nintendo’s profit margins. Nintendo clearly cheaped out on this display despite charging $450.

Andrés Gutiérrez 🇻🇪's profile picture
Andrés Gutiérrez 🇻🇪1 year ago

DOGSHIT CONSOLE!!!

Neoelli Mapping's profile picture
Neoelli Mapping1 year ago

Df talking completly nonesense again but Go ahead If you still belive them Not my Problem

Tripster's profile picture
Tripster1 year ago

DF is nonsense now? They're more reliable than you

Miller Lite's profile picture
Miller Lite1 year ago

“Digital foundry confirms, even though there has already been tutorials on how to toggle things such as the HDR”

Tripster's profile picture
Tripster1 year ago

Yes! That's me! Cool! This isn't affecting me, the less you know about me the better

The Gaming Dude's profile picture
The Gaming Dude1 year ago

You dont even Play games

Tripster's profile picture
Tripster1 year ago

Cry harder bitch

DoNotArgue's profile picture
DoNotArgue1 year ago

SD OLED is $560 with lower res, only 90hz, and a smaller screen despite it being OLED 💀💀

Tripster's profile picture
Tripster1 year ago

OLED is superior 90hz yes that's good The switch has 120hz and not a single game is using it. Smaller screen? That's a actually a good thing for me, didn't you Fanboys claimed the Steam Deck was too big ? By your own logic the Steam Deck wins

Related Videos

First, the conclusion: the so called Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leak from last night turned out to be a false alarm. After watching the original video over and over again, I'm convinced it isn't a Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. It's actually the blue version of the Galaxy Z Fold7. Because of the lighting and color temperature, the blue frame appeared black on camera, which led to the confusion. Here are the three biggest clues: 1. The inner display camera cutout is too large. Compared with the official Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra renders, the inner camera hole on the Fold8 Ultra is noticeably smaller. The one in the leaked video is still the larger Fold7-style cutout. 2. The rear camera housing doesn't match. The cylindrical camera housing reflects light with a bright metallic sheen, which is much more consistent with the blue Galaxy Z Fold7 than the black Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. Some of the hardware details also don't line up. 3. The inner display is still highly reflective. The device in the video shows obvious screen reflections. However, the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is the first Fold to feature an anti reflective inner display film. Anyone familiar with Samsung foldables should immediately notice that the reflections don't look like this. Based on these three points, I'm confident the device in the video is a blue Galaxy Z Fold7, not the Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra. The confusion is understandable because the two generations are incredibly similar. They share the same overall dimensions and aspect ratio, making them very easy to mix up. The good news is that the real Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra will be even better. It will have an even less visible crease than the Fold7, along with the new anti reflective inner display film.

Ice Universe

126,235 views • 22 days ago

The Engine Start Levers or Fuel Cut off switches (different name, same switches) control the fuel and ignition for the engines. The 787 shares the same switches and very similar logic to the Boeing 737 Max. The switches have been designed in such a way that they require a very deliberate movement in order for them to move from one position to another. They’re also placed in such a position (below the thrust levers) so that it’s very unlikely that they’ll be knocked. But even if they were, the spring force and detent would prevent them from moving unintentionally. When we move the start levers from the “Run” or “Idle” position, to “Cutoff”, an electrical signal is sent to move the fuel valves from open to close. The engine ignitors are also then de-powered. This stops the supply and ignition of fuel and the engine spools down. Pilots are trained from day one to only touch those switches in flight when called for by a non normal checklist, such as an engine fire or failure. When a fuel switch has to be moved to cutoff in flight, we adhere to a very strict procedure… Pilot monitoring will place their hand on the switch of the damaged engine and both visually and audibly confirm with Pilot flying that the correct fuel switch has been selected. Only after both pilots have confirmed that the correct switch has been selected, will pilot monitoring move that switch to the cutoff position. As an additional layer of safety, some aircraft types only allow the switch to be moved to cutoff in flight if the thrust levers are in the closed or idle position. Do you think that this design feature should be implemented in all aircraft? 📸 by ig/airlinepilotperformance

aircraftmaintenancengineer

149,946 views • 1 year ago