Do we really need an AI disaster before Washington and Beijing get serious about working together? My full conversation with The Economist on this, and the wider question of US-China relations, is out now:

Glad to see the "oh noes, evil electric!" propaganda is being updated for 2026.

LABOR just sold out to ai billionaires so pull the other one.

May I respectfully suggest that Beijing has shown a greater willingness to enact AI-specific regulations than Washington. Whether China's approach is the correct approach is another matter.

Chatham House and their globalists cohort want to control SI. Thats the fear porn scam. Rudd is a traitor.

0 IT experience/ 0 understanding of how an AI is even made let alone used... Cyber security toolage isn't the threat - idiots like Rudd are.

Natural Unintelligence in our political (corporate) class has done far more damage, AI is the distraction so we dont realise you all are responsible.

From what I've read, China is far more serious about regulating labour, technology and security risks as pertains to AI, than major Western governments. They also haven't turned AI into a ponzi/casino - unlike the US. Which is why China isn't panicking, and the US is.

"Do we really need an AI disaster before Washington and Beijing get serious about working together?" Seriously? After COVID? Can you name a treaty that the PRC has not broken? Kev... when your clown show closes... you are left with 2 choices - pick one.

It's almost a disaster now. Chinese has a saying that everything has a spirit (万物有灵). All major AI models each has developed a giant spirit. Currently God commanded the energy in their forms to dismiss to restrain their stretch across Pacific Ocean and into high sky.

You narcissistic cock head Rudd

We had you, so you could be an expert on disasters.

years of you bending over backwards for Xi Jinping backfires only to see Xi Jinping is bending over backwards for Trump. Envy is such a powerful tool for foolish cravens like you @MrKRudd

If you don't know, you're an idiot, which I don't put past you, any military tech is at least 2 decades old before the public get a sniff at it. You think they don't know? They are way ahead of you fear mongers and that's what you're afraid of. Well, it's too late for that.

On the planets future; Here's my latest Gemini chat, reformatted (w yes too much of Gemi&my chattings) I urge folks to try read, going to all Gemi&my chats of #AgrarianSocialistVillages in how humanity can, but I say "must" & ASAP re-demography ourselves.

And let you regulate it, please

dolt

Watch the full video on the Economist here:

Why is Kevin Rudd so everywhere again. We voted you out. We hated you. And we want you to get lost.

Fear-mongering parasites

An AI “disaster”? Like an accident?? In reality, we should be concerned that our adversaries (China, Russia, Iran, NK), will intentionally use AI against us.

Please, AI could provide breakthroughs for major diseases like cancer, insights into future unlimited free energy, sustainable food production in arid environments, not to mention the many other benefits. The danger is for governments losing control which is what its all about.

Kevin the Relentless.

IMO Sire, AI, ecocide, WW3 & plain mass-psychosis, give us but 30yrs & the whole human show will hv imploded "90%" terminally. UNLESS! (dadadaaa!) We ALL #Decentralize & #deindustrialize to 12million-of #AgrarianSocialist Micro-Villages Equitably, Arably sprinkled across MumEarth

Australia gave aviation the black box. Maybe the Medicare breach is where we start giving AI one: what the agent was asked, what it did, what it said it did.

We believe we're already facing a Cuban Missile Crisis situation now, @MrKRudd. But one of humanity against uncontrollable, unaligned AI more than one of any country against any other country. Existential safety is the quintessential transpartisan issue. Humanity itself is at risk from AI. We can all show Trump and Xi that there is a win-win way forward that protects and benefits all of humanity at the same time. Anyone sign and share this to show your support: Our team believes we have a real shot at creating a much better, safer world for all. But some of us also live off-grid already. We live in "interesting times" indeed.

Hopefully true. As a big user of AI, it needs to be regulated.