Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Do you even know how Lollapalooza works? IVE's performance started and finished during the day, then Justin Timberlake performed, closing that stage at night, because HE IS the headliner. I don't mean to call you dumb, but why is it so hard for you to understand?

114,470 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨Chicarito is not a fan of ex-mates(Scholes, Neville etc) criticizing Michael Carrick 🗣️Ferdinand : “What have you made of Michael Carrick” 🗣️Chicarito: “I love it. I love I love it.” 🗣️Ferdinand: “because some of our ex teammates have been very critical like” 🗣️Chicarito : “I don't know why I, I really don't know why, I mean because I feel that sometimes, I mean it hasn't happened to me yet …..maybe I hope it never happened, But there's a a fine line between criticizing someone's job because you have to…..but then having your own opinions” “one thing is saying someone play bad but then your opinions why he played bad is an entirely different reason” “it's like saying chicharito miss a goal… that's a fact we can all agree but saying chicharito miss a goal because…..what a fcking prick. You know that's how it’s like… come on man” “So, I I don't I don't understand. And and then how you going to criticize a manager who's giving you results? He puts your team back to Champions League game. So, he deserves the consequence of that, you know, stay, you know, and and try to bring him players and and give him the project. Then, if it doesn't work, well, it doesn't work. But but he took the team low. He put him the team back again in Champions League games. So now players are going to want to come because they want to play for Manchester United plus Champions League. “

Kels

382,309 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 просмотров • 1 год назад

DEEP THOUGHTS from Scott Adams and Naval on Singularity Theory and the nature of consciousness. Naval: I try not to go too much in the supernatural, but I'll be honest, there are times when I've prayed. (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) Scott: Can't hurt! Naval: Nobody's perfect! Yeah, exactly. Pascal's wager, right? Just in case! Scott: Yeah, I've got a version of this. I don't know if I've ever said this out loud before, but every now and then I just talk to the creators of The Simulation that are watching me -- because it might be me . . . . Naval: Yeah, exactly! No, I completely agree. Yes, if simulation hypothesis is true, then, you know, God or creator or master programmer has your best interest at heart. Scott: I say things like, you know: "Is this the plan? I mean, are you really going to do this thing?" Naval: Exactly. Exactly. No, yeah. Like, “don't take me out of the game too fast.” Like, “you need some resource if you want me to be effective, right?” Or like, “I'm not Job. Don't try me. I'll fail.” (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) “Let's not go through. Let's not take that route. Let's try a different one.” Yeah, I think everybody does that. Because at the end of the day, existence itself is an unexplained miracle! Like how did we get here? Why am I here? Why am I a monkey? Why am I three dimensional? Why am I male? Why am I talking to you right now? What does it even mean to talk, right? The whole thing is so surreal that there is an instantaneous and overarching miracle of just consciousness. Like why even be conscious? Why not just be like zombies or robots talking to each other, going through the same actions? Why even be aware? So, there's so much here that you just have to take axiomatically -- and that is spirituality. And I think your spirituality, your current religion, is a Simulation Hypothesis. It's perfectly valid, you know. Mine is probably closer to the Tao and, you know, other people's Christianity or whatever, but somehow, you have to explain this miracle of existence. And everyone has to do it in their own frame. But the rest is science, right? The rest is all -- follows the rules of science. And so, what I don't like is when like someone says: “This one, I'm correct, it's scientific, you should believe it because of these following arguments.” And then I'm like: “Okay, well, what are the implications? How do we test it?” If you want me to believe in the real world, it has to be scientific, which means it has to be testable. There's a third category that I will accept, which is direct experience, but it's only valid for you. So, if you have a direct experience of something, you can hold it, but your ability to convey it is zero, because everybody has their own experience and you can't take anybody else's experience at value. Scott: I'll give you that. I'm gonna give you that my personal experience is so bizarre that -- I mean, it's not, I don't think it's quite Elon Musk level, but I mean, you've got your own life that's kind of, doesn't match. Naval: Yeah, very surreal. Yeah. Scott: I mean, how do the three of us exist? Is this really – like, there's so many things in my life that happened, and I'm sure you have the same feeling, where you just say, how is this real? I mean, just how is this real? Naval: If you want to talk absolute truth, and nothing else, the only statement that you can make that is absolutely true is that – what’s that? Go ahead. Scott: I know where this is going. Naval: Sorry. What's yours? Scott: It's that we exist. To ask the question. That's the only thing you know. Naval: It's actually even worse than that! (Ha, ha, ha, ha.) I used to say it was I exist and then a very smart friend of mine corrected me and he said, no, awareness exists. You don't even know that you exist. Your thought, like yes, your current thought exists and you're aware of that current thought, but what is the you that is having that thought? That's the whole Buddhist question, the whole enlightenment question. Is there a persistent self-identity other than just thoughts that are referring to each other? Like when you look for yourself, you're not actually there. There's an awareness. The awareness exists, but the you separate from that awareness, does that even exist? Full transcript of podcast (excerpt begins at 54:33): Full video:

ScottAdamsVids

104,969 просмотров • 1 год назад

Abdul El-Sayed doesn't even know what the federal budget is, yet he wants to spend 4 TRILLION DOLLARS on medicare-for-all. JESSE WATTERS: "I don't want you guys to blow the country up. Do you know how much the federal budget is now?" ABDUL EL-SAYED: "No. Neither do I. Pete Hegseth --" JESSE WATTERS: "Answer the question. Do you know what the federal budget is for?" ABDUL EL-SAYED: "I just want to talk about this. You want to talk about budgets. I'm happy to do that. The guy who used to work on your channel, I think he was the sixth host on that five. He wanted to raise our military budget to $1.5 trillion, and you don't seem to be upset about that. So we can fight we don't know how to get out of to raise our gas prices five dollars a gallon? That doesn't make sense to me, Jesse." From there the ad hominens started coming in. JESSE WATTERS "I have a feeling, Abdul, you don't even know how much money the government spends every year. Do you know?" ABDUL EL-SAYED: "Look, the question, Jesse, to me --" JESSE WATTERS: "Alright, so you don't know. Let me tell you what it is. It's $7 trillion a year, and your plan to take over the health care system is four trillion." ABDUL-EL SAYED: "To exactly your point --" JESSE WATTERS: "I'm not very good at math, I don't think you're very good at math either. Go ahead." ABDUL EL-SAYED: "Clearly. Clearly you don't. And you don't seem to care, but I don't think most Americans want to spend that much money on military escapades so that the folks stranded on the USS Abraham Lincoln can even get a sausage for breakfast, because I just think that we could do a whole lot better with our money. And I think that's where you and I --" JESSE WATTERS: "Yeah, I disagree. I think if you spend $4 trillion, everything else is going to get really expensive."

Overton

23,028 просмотров • 4 дней назад