Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

“Does smoking a joint every few days actually hurt me?” Bill Maher asked Andrew Huberman the question most casual users want answered. Huberman’s reply: For most healthy adults, occasional use is likely low-risk. But if you have a genetic predisposition to schizophrenia or psychosis, cannabis can trigger it —... even at moderate doses — by overstimulating dopamine pathways in the developing brain. He also noted cannabis is being rescheduled to Schedule III, which should finally allow proper research into both benefits and risks. A refreshingly honest exchange that skips the usual hype on both sides. Do you think occasional cannabis use is mostly harmless for healthy adults, or do we still downplay the mental health risks?show more

Camus

454,556 subscribers

511,454 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & Wellness Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Andrew Huberman dropped a hard truth back in 2023 that still sparks debate: The “pot voice” is real. Chronic high-THC cannabis use literally alters speech patterns and time perception in the brain, making heavy users sound slow or “dumb” — even if they’re articulate when sober. But the much bigger concern? High-potency cannabis, especially in teens and young males, significantly raises the risk of psychosis later in life. Huberman cited strong Canadian research linking it to a large portion of street homelessness and severe mental health issues we see today. He’s not anti-cannabis (“live and let live”), but he’s clear: this is not the harmless drug many claim it is — particularly for developing brains. Have you noticed the “pot voice” in heavy users… or known someone whose mental health changed after heavy cannabis use?

Andrew Huberman dropped a hard truth back in 2023 that still sparks debate: The “pot voice” is real. Chronic high-THC cannabis use literally alters speech patterns and time perception in the brain, making heavy users sound slow or “dumb” — even if they’re articulate when sober. But the much bigger concern? High-potency cannabis, especially in teens and young males, significantly raises the risk of psychosis later in life. Huberman cited strong Canadian research linking it to a large portion of street homelessness and severe mental health issues we see today. He’s not anti-cannabis (“live and let live”), but he’s clear: this is not the harmless drug many claim it is — particularly for developing brains. Have you noticed the “pot voice” in heavy users… or known someone whose mental health changed after heavy cannabis use?

Camus

234,269 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Journalist and marijuana expert Alex Berenson is convinced that Trump made a mistake with his executive order rescheduling the drug to Schedule III. I asked him why: “Cannabis and THC are really good at doing one thing, getting people high. That's what they're good at,” he told me. According to him, they are not useful as pain killers: “You don't find lasting effects of pain relief from cannabis. I think the reason for that is that what cannabis is really good at, what THC is really good at, is enhancing sensation… but if you're in pain, in the long run, enhancing sensation actually is not a good thing for you. …And there was a really good study a few years ago in Australia where people who used [it] for a long period of time actually used more opioids than people who didn't use cannabis. And so the idea that cannabis is a substitute or a way out of our opioid problem is just not true.” Nor does he think studies show that marijuana is beneficial against cancer and other health conditions: “Unfortunately, for the most part, those studies, when they're done and done well, do not show much impact for cannabis on most of the things it's supposed to help, much less things like cancer.”

Journalist and marijuana expert Alex Berenson is convinced that Trump made a mistake with his executive order rescheduling the drug to Schedule III. I asked him why: “Cannabis and THC are really good at doing one thing, getting people high. That's what they're good at,” he told me. According to him, they are not useful as pain killers: “You don't find lasting effects of pain relief from cannabis. I think the reason for that is that what cannabis is really good at, what THC is really good at, is enhancing sensation… but if you're in pain, in the long run, enhancing sensation actually is not a good thing for you. …And there was a really good study a few years ago in Australia where people who used [it] for a long period of time actually used more opioids than people who didn't use cannabis. And so the idea that cannabis is a substitute or a way out of our opioid problem is just not true.” Nor does he think studies show that marijuana is beneficial against cancer and other health conditions: “Unfortunately, for the most part, those studies, when they're done and done well, do not show much impact for cannabis on most of the things it's supposed to help, much less things like cancer.”

Jan Jekielek

17,431 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇺🇸 CANNABIS DOWNGRADED - SCIENCE FINALLY GETS THE KEYS After 55 years in federal purgatory, marijuana just got reclassified from Schedule I to Schedule III. Meaning, the U.S. government no longer insists cannabis has “no medical value” - a position that aged about as well as leaded gasoline. This doesn’t legalize weed. It does something more disruptive: It lets scientists study the stuff people are already smoking, vaping, eating, and prescribing - without DEA agents counting the locks on their lab doors. Until now, cannabis research was stuck in observational purgatory. No real clinical trials. No dispensary-grade products. Just lots of paperwork, delays, and federally approved weed that didn’t resemble what consumers actually use. Schedule III changes that. Researchers can run proper trials. Track dosage. Measure risks. Compare cannabinoids to opioids instead of vibes. Here’s a simple truth though: Cannabis isn’t a miracle drug. It’s also not harmless. The data we do have shows pain relief potential - and real risks for teens, mental health, and memory. Expect a research surge. Smarter prescribing. Louder warnings for youth. And a slow, evidence-driven reckoning that cuts through decades of culture-war nonsense. We’re about to find out what weed actually does - not what stoners, cops, or politicians say it does. And that might be the most dangerous thing yet. Source: NBC News

🇺🇸 CANNABIS DOWNGRADED - SCIENCE FINALLY GETS THE KEYS After 55 years in federal purgatory, marijuana just got reclassified from Schedule I to Schedule III. Meaning, the U.S. government no longer insists cannabis has “no medical value” - a position that aged about as well as leaded gasoline. This doesn’t legalize weed. It does something more disruptive: It lets scientists study the stuff people are already smoking, vaping, eating, and prescribing - without DEA agents counting the locks on their lab doors. Until now, cannabis research was stuck in observational purgatory. No real clinical trials. No dispensary-grade products. Just lots of paperwork, delays, and federally approved weed that didn’t resemble what consumers actually use. Schedule III changes that. Researchers can run proper trials. Track dosage. Measure risks. Compare cannabinoids to opioids instead of vibes. Here’s a simple truth though: Cannabis isn’t a miracle drug. It’s also not harmless. The data we do have shows pain relief potential - and real risks for teens, mental health, and memory. Expect a research surge. Smarter prescribing. Louder warnings for youth. And a slow, evidence-driven reckoning that cuts through decades of culture-war nonsense. We’re about to find out what weed actually does - not what stoners, cops, or politicians say it does. And that might be the most dangerous thing yet. Source: NBC News

Mario Nawfal

42,887 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Andrew Huberman on Bill Maher dropped this one: “Alcohol is worse than pot.” Zero is best. For most non-alcoholics, the upper limit before you start raising cancer risk — especially breast cancer in women — is about two drinks per week. Not per night. Per week. Even moderate drinking messes with your sleep quality, wrecks your gut microbiome, and quietly raises other risks. New studies keep confirming it. Huberman’s take: If you enjoy drinking, at least know what you’re trading. Offset it with morning sunlight, exercise, and better food. We treat alcohol like harmless fun, but it might be one of the most damaging socially accepted habits we have. Many people notice significantly better sleep and daily energy after cutting back. What about you — have you changed how much you drink after seeing the latest research, or do you still think the occasional drink is basically fine?

Andrew Huberman on Bill Maher dropped this one: “Alcohol is worse than pot.” Zero is best. For most non-alcoholics, the upper limit before you start raising cancer risk — especially breast cancer in women — is about two drinks per week. Not per night. Per week. Even moderate drinking messes with your sleep quality, wrecks your gut microbiome, and quietly raises other risks. New studies keep confirming it. Huberman’s take: If you enjoy drinking, at least know what you’re trading. Offset it with morning sunlight, exercise, and better food. We treat alcohol like harmless fun, but it might be one of the most damaging socially accepted habits we have. Many people notice significantly better sleep and daily energy after cutting back. What about you — have you changed how much you drink after seeing the latest research, or do you still think the occasional drink is basically fine?

Camus

659,565 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

As a cardiologist, I've treated young people who had heart attacks after using cocaine at parties. These drugs can be dangerous for your heart. Patients often ask me about cannabis (marijuana or weed). 📄 We just published a paper showing that cannabis use is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and may trigger acute events—even in young adults with no traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Why? Cannabis can: 🫀 Make the heart work harder (increasing oxygen demand) 🫁 Reduce oxygen delivery when smoked through carbon monoxide exposure ⚠️ Cause coronary artery spasm 🩸 Affect blood vessel function 🩹 Increase the risk of blood clots 📊 Key findings: • Nearly 5× higher risk of heart attack in the first hour after use • 25% higher heart attack risk with daily use 💬 If you use cannabis, discuss it openly with your doctor so you can make informed decisions about your cardiovascular health. 🔗 Read the full paper: #HeartHealth #Cannabis #Weed #marijuana

As a cardiologist, I've treated young people who had heart attacks after using cocaine at parties. These drugs can be dangerous for your heart. Patients often ask me about cannabis (marijuana or weed). 📄 We just published a paper showing that cannabis use is associated with an increased risk of heart attack and may trigger acute events—even in young adults with no traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Why? Cannabis can: 🫀 Make the heart work harder (increasing oxygen demand) 🫁 Reduce oxygen delivery when smoked through carbon monoxide exposure ⚠️ Cause coronary artery spasm 🩸 Affect blood vessel function 🩹 Increase the risk of blood clots 📊 Key findings: • Nearly 5× higher risk of heart attack in the first hour after use • 25% higher heart attack risk with daily use 💬 If you use cannabis, discuss it openly with your doctor so you can make informed decisions about your cardiovascular health. 🔗 Read the full paper: #HeartHealth #Cannabis #Weed #marijuana

Chayakrit Krittanawong, MD, FACC, FSCAI

16,364 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

Andrew Huberman dropped a surprising take on Tom Segura’s podcast: Nicotine itself is actually neuroprotective — it boosts focus, memory, acetylcholine, dopamine, and may help protect against Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. But here’s the catch: smoking cigarettes is still terrible (thousands of carcinogens), vaping has nasty chemicals, and dipping/snuffing isn’t much better. Huberman doesn’t smoke or vape — he takes Alpha GPC (a supplement) to get the cognitive benefits without the poison. It’s a classic Huberman distinction: the molecule can be useful, the delivery method is often the problem. This one made me rethink nicotine entirely. Would you ever use nicotine (gum, patch, etc.) for focus and brain health, or is the risk not worth it to you?

Andrew Huberman dropped a surprising take on Tom Segura’s podcast: Nicotine itself is actually neuroprotective — it boosts focus, memory, acetylcholine, dopamine, and may help protect against Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s. But here’s the catch: smoking cigarettes is still terrible (thousands of carcinogens), vaping has nasty chemicals, and dipping/snuffing isn’t much better. Huberman doesn’t smoke or vape — he takes Alpha GPC (a supplement) to get the cognitive benefits without the poison. It’s a classic Huberman distinction: the molecule can be useful, the delivery method is often the problem. This one made me rethink nicotine entirely. Would you ever use nicotine (gum, patch, etc.) for focus and brain health, or is the risk not worth it to you?

Camus

408,312 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Cannabis was my off ramp from SSRIs and benzodiazepines. I did not use it to replace those medications or to mask anxiety or depression. I used it to get off them. Anyone who has tried to wean off SSRIs or benzos knows how hard that can be. Cannabis helped reduce the withdrawal and made the process manageable. That experience changed how I saw this plant. A lot of what I had been taught about cannabis was simply wrong. For me it wasn’t an escape. It was a legitimate tool that worked when I needed it. That realization set the direction of my life. I devoted myself to understanding this plant and to helping build a serious, regulated industry around it so others would not have to suffer in silence or shame. That is why I broke down on the livestream. For the first time in more than 50 years, the federal government acknowledged that cannabis has medicinal value. Schedule III does not fix everything, but it is real progress. I have spent my adult life in this industry. Seeing that moment happen hit deeper than I expected. Schedule III is a step forward, and sometimes a step is enough to remind you why you started in the first place.

Cannabis was my off ramp from SSRIs and benzodiazepines. I did not use it to replace those medications or to mask anxiety or depression. I used it to get off them. Anyone who has tried to wean off SSRIs or benzos knows how hard that can be. Cannabis helped reduce the withdrawal and made the process manageable. That experience changed how I saw this plant. A lot of what I had been taught about cannabis was simply wrong. For me it wasn’t an escape. It was a legitimate tool that worked when I needed it. That realization set the direction of my life. I devoted myself to understanding this plant and to helping build a serious, regulated industry around it so others would not have to suffer in silence or shame. That is why I broke down on the livestream. For the first time in more than 50 years, the federal government acknowledged that cannabis has medicinal value. Schedule III does not fix everything, but it is real progress. I have spent my adult life in this industry. Seeing that moment happen hit deeper than I expected. Schedule III is a step forward, and sometimes a step is enough to remind you why you started in the first place.

Kyle Sherman

14,405 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Bill Maher once asked: “Isn’t alcohol worse than everything?” Andrew Huberman basically answered: yeah. Zero alcohol is best. If you drink, two drinks per week is roughly the upper limit before risks start climbing — higher cancer odds (especially breast cancer), worse sleep quality, and gut microbiome damage. Huberman isn’t a teetotaler. He says do what you want, but know the trade-offs. Drinking is already trending down as people realize the hidden costs. His practical advice: keep it minimal and offset any damage with morning sunlight, exercise, and solid nutrition — especially as you age when recovery matters more. It’s a sobering reality check on that casual nightly glass of wine. Where do you stand — strict limits, occasional drinks, or cutting it out entirely?

Bill Maher once asked: “Isn’t alcohol worse than everything?” Andrew Huberman basically answered: yeah. Zero alcohol is best. If you drink, two drinks per week is roughly the upper limit before risks start climbing — higher cancer odds (especially breast cancer), worse sleep quality, and gut microbiome damage. Huberman isn’t a teetotaler. He says do what you want, but know the trade-offs. Drinking is already trending down as people realize the hidden costs. His practical advice: keep it minimal and offset any damage with morning sunlight, exercise, and solid nutrition — especially as you age when recovery matters more. It’s a sobering reality check on that casual nightly glass of wine. Where do you stand — strict limits, occasional drinks, or cutting it out entirely?

Camus

1,946,930 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

What shocked Alex Berenson most in his marijuana research was not the psychosis link, but these two things: emerging data on severe heart damage in young users and spikes in high‑speed crashes after legalization. “There's increasing evidence in the last ten years that cannabis and THC…can cause really severe heart damage. There is a link to myocardial infarction, heart attacks, and that link is pretty strong. Now you can find papers that show a 3x increase over a multi-year period, and these are young people,” he says. States that have legalized marijuana use have also seen a lot more high-speed car accidents, directly contradicting the popular belief that cannabis users drive more slowly or cautiously.

What shocked Alex Berenson most in his marijuana research was not the psychosis link, but these two things: emerging data on severe heart damage in young users and spikes in high‑speed crashes after legalization. “There's increasing evidence in the last ten years that cannabis and THC…can cause really severe heart damage. There is a link to myocardial infarction, heart attacks, and that link is pretty strong. Now you can find papers that show a 3x increase over a multi-year period, and these are young people,” he says. States that have legalized marijuana use have also seen a lot more high-speed car accidents, directly contradicting the popular belief that cannabis users drive more slowly or cautiously.

Jan Jekielek

31,788 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Use creatine to protect your brain from head injuries: Repeated head injuries can lead to second-impact syndrome, where a subsequent injury before full recovery causes rapid and potentially permanent brain damage. This is a significant risk for athletes, military, or anyone prone to traumatic brain injury (TBI) or concussions. But here's the good news: research has shown that creatine supplementation can help mitigate the damage caused by second-impact syndrome. In fact, studies have found that creatine depletion prior to additional impacts can worsen the damage to your brain. So, what should you do? If you do experience a head injury, it's essential to replenish your creatine stores as quickly as possible. Creatine monohydrate is a good option, as it's the most researched and widely used form in studies, and it's also one of the most affordable and available options. Creating a regular creatine supplementation routine can be beneficial for overall health and wellness, regardless of your risk level for head injuries. You can obtain creatine through both food sources and supplements. While it is possible to get creatine from food, particularly from meat sources (which contain around 400-600mg of creatine per 100g or 3.5oz serving), it can be challenging to achieve the high dosages needed through diet alone. Most studies on creatine monohydrate for brain injuries have used high dosages of around 20g per day, which is significantly higher than the typical dosages used for performance benefits. As a preventative measure, a daily dose of 5-10g may be sufficient for most people. However, if you know you'll be at risk of exposure to head impacts, you may want to increase your dosage to 20-30g per day for a week, split into multiple doses. Remember, the primary goal should always be to minimize the number of head impacts and injuries in the first place.

Andy Galpin, PhD

137,470 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

RFK Jr. gave a calm, straightforward answer to a mom on Dr. Phil. When asked what he’d tell a new mom about vaccines, he said: Do your own research. You research the stroller. You research the food. You should research the medicine too. It’s your responsibility as a parent in a democracy. This one hit me. In an era where trust in institutions is low and information feels overwhelming, his point feels grounded, parents ultimately carry the weight of these decisions. Whether you’re pro-vaccine, cautious, or somewhere in between, encouraging informed consent and personal responsibility is something we should all be able to agree on. Blind trust or blind rejection both carry risks. What’s your take? Do you think parents should do deep independent research on vaccines, or is it better to mostly trust the standard medical guidance?

RFK Jr. gave a calm, straightforward answer to a mom on Dr. Phil. When asked what he’d tell a new mom about vaccines, he said: Do your own research. You research the stroller. You research the food. You should research the medicine too. It’s your responsibility as a parent in a democracy. This one hit me. In an era where trust in institutions is low and information feels overwhelming, his point feels grounded, parents ultimately carry the weight of these decisions. Whether you’re pro-vaccine, cautious, or somewhere in between, encouraging informed consent and personal responsibility is something we should all be able to agree on. Blind trust or blind rejection both carry risks. What’s your take? Do you think parents should do deep independent research on vaccines, or is it better to mostly trust the standard medical guidance?

Camus

54,769 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

One of the world’s most experienced brain-imaging psychiatrists dropped a bombshell on Tucker Carlson’s show. Dr. Daniel Amen (80,000+ brain scans in his career) revealed the results of his published study on 1,000 regular cannabis users vs healthy controls: → Every single region of the brain showed significantly lower blood flow and activity on SPECT imaging → The same scans also measure mitochondrial function (the energy factories inside your cells) — and those were dramatically lower too → A brand-new 2024 study from an completely independent research group on another 1,000 young cannabis users found the exact same pattern, especially in the brain areas responsible for learning and memory This isn’t opinion. These are measurable, published findings from two separate teams using advanced brain imaging. Whether you use cannabis or not, the science is worth knowing. Watch the 1:55 clip below — Dr. Amen explains it clearly and calmly.

Camus

184,977 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“To the young people, once again, this country expects a lot from you. And when I say the country, I mean you. You are, in fact, waiting for yourselves. You are the future you are looking toward. But it comes back to the process I was talking about, the mindset, the spirit, and everything else I mentioned, education and health. You must have knowledge, and you must have good health. Because if you are not healthy, what use is knowledge? What good is knowing anything if you do not have the health to make use of it? You must have both. And it is entirely possible to have both, if you make the choice to pursue both. It cannot be one without the other. It is like raising a child, or planting a tree. You plant the seed, and as it grows, you continue giving it what it needs in order to thrive. It is the same with people. You need knowledge, and you should do everything possible to acquire it. But not simply to possess it. You must be able to use that knowledge to achieve the goals you have set for yourselves.” President Kagame, Chairman of the RPF | RPF Bureau Politique.

“To the young people, once again, this country expects a lot from you. And when I say the country, I mean you. You are, in fact, waiting for yourselves. You are the future you are looking toward. But it comes back to the process I was talking about, the mindset, the spirit, and everything else I mentioned, education and health. You must have knowledge, and you must have good health. Because if you are not healthy, what use is knowledge? What good is knowing anything if you do not have the health to make use of it? You must have both. And it is entirely possible to have both, if you make the choice to pursue both. It cannot be one without the other. It is like raising a child, or planting a tree. You plant the seed, and as it grows, you continue giving it what it needs in order to thrive. It is the same with people. You need knowledge, and you should do everything possible to acquire it. But not simply to possess it. You must be able to use that knowledge to achieve the goals you have set for yourselves.” President Kagame, Chairman of the RPF | RPF Bureau Politique.

Presidency | Rwanda

34,799 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

1. Being loved at home and having a good example of love from home does not guarantee you'll get into a healthy relationship or marriage. I have said this countless times. The beauty of being loved at home is that you'll always have a good support system if things go south. But whether your relationship is beautiful or toxic is entirely up to you. Your parents chose themselves and worked through their relationship. You'll have to choose your own partner yourself and build your relationship. Your parents did not have healthy relationship because their parents had healthy relationship. They did that by themselves. Healthy relationship is not transmitted by genetics. Most people use emotions over logic and so choose nonsense. If you've been shown the liht and was taught good values, it is up you to use it to your benefit. The universe is not a reward system. Healthy relationship will not come to you simply for being a good person. You have to vet by yourself and for yourself to choose someone that is compatible with you and loves you with their life.

1. Being loved at home and having a good example of love from home does not guarantee you'll get into a healthy relationship or marriage. I have said this countless times. The beauty of being loved at home is that you'll always have a good support system if things go south. But whether your relationship is beautiful or toxic is entirely up to you. Your parents chose themselves and worked through their relationship. You'll have to choose your own partner yourself and build your relationship. Your parents did not have healthy relationship because their parents had healthy relationship. They did that by themselves. Healthy relationship is not transmitted by genetics. Most people use emotions over logic and so choose nonsense. If you've been shown the liht and was taught good values, it is up you to use it to your benefit. The universe is not a reward system. Healthy relationship will not come to you simply for being a good person. You have to vet by yourself and for yourself to choose someone that is compatible with you and loves you with their life.

Sir Dickson

532,999 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

.Scott Wu to Joe Lonsdale on why Cognition uses AI in job interviews: "One or two years ago, people had this mentality of 'How do we make sure people aren't using AI while we're interviewing them?' And I think that has totally flipped. Honestly, I think that was wrong... If you're asking the question of like, how do we evaluate people on exactly the thing that AI can already do, that seems kind of the wrong. Our interview process has always been... you can use as much AI as you want to use. We're going to give you a few hours. Just build your whole own product surface. A lot of these are projects that, frankly, is like, if you were trying to do this by hand, you would not be able to get done in a few hours. So you kind of have to use AI for this. But in reality, what we actually want to test is, in addition to how familiar you are with these tools, what we actually want to test is, what do you think is the right thing to build? Or how do you make these product decisions? How do you make these trade-offs? How do you decide or collect information about what you should be doing?"

American Optimist

13,182 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Hall of Fame Bodybuilder and 6 time Mr. Olympia Dorian Yates on how he considers cannabis a health supplement: “Sometimes people get confused, like ‘You’re supposed to be healthy. You're supposed to be an athlete. What are you doing smoking marijuana?’ I consider it a health supplement. Every day, I got 40 tablets here. But guess what? More powerful than all those things together, although they're beneficial, is my cannabis oil I take every day. I got my left knee- the cartilage is nearly gone. The shoulders- the supraspinatus is gone. When I go for a scan, they're like, ‘Do you know your shoulder arthritis is really bad? You must be in a ton of pain.’ Nothing- I don’t have any pain. I consider cannabis to be the most powerful health supplement you can take. People have just had this misinformation for so long, so strong in their brain. It's hard to change. Especially if you don't have any experience with it yourself. Sometimes I like to smoke a little bit before I do cardio because it opens my bronchals and I get a better workout or it's generally in the evening when I'm relaxing or if I wanna do something creative like I'm writing or something. I think the people that smoke marijuana are generally nicer, kinder, more thoughtful people, and realize that in some way, we're all connected- we're not fucking independent. So how's that a bad thing?” 📌 JRE 989 July 25, 2017 Joe Rogan Podcast News

Hall of Fame Bodybuilder and 6 time Mr. Olympia Dorian Yates on how he considers cannabis a health supplement: “Sometimes people get confused, like ‘You’re supposed to be healthy. You're supposed to be an athlete. What are you doing smoking marijuana?’ I consider it a health supplement. Every day, I got 40 tablets here. But guess what? More powerful than all those things together, although they're beneficial, is my cannabis oil I take every day. I got my left knee- the cartilage is nearly gone. The shoulders- the supraspinatus is gone. When I go for a scan, they're like, ‘Do you know your shoulder arthritis is really bad? You must be in a ton of pain.’ Nothing- I don’t have any pain. I consider cannabis to be the most powerful health supplement you can take. People have just had this misinformation for so long, so strong in their brain. It's hard to change. Especially if you don't have any experience with it yourself. Sometimes I like to smoke a little bit before I do cardio because it opens my bronchals and I get a better workout or it's generally in the evening when I'm relaxing or if I wanna do something creative like I'm writing or something. I think the people that smoke marijuana are generally nicer, kinder, more thoughtful people, and realize that in some way, we're all connected- we're not fucking independent. So how's that a bad thing?” 📌 JRE 989 July 25, 2017 Joe Rogan Podcast News

Joe

22,458 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Adam Carolla made a sharp point on Megyn Kelly: We spent decades winning the war on cigarette smoking… then turned around and basically told everyone weed is harmless medicine. Now we have a generation that doesn’t smoke cigarettes but smokes a lot of pot — and it’s quietly messing a lot of young people up. Carolla said if you asked the average progressive mom whether she’d rather her teenage son smoke cigarettes or weed, most would pick weed. We traded one public health problem for another, this time with a trendy “natural” halo around it. I’ve seen this cultural shift happen in many places — the “weed is safe” narrative got pushed so hard that we’ve downplayed the real effects on developing brains. What do you think — did society overcorrect on cigarettes and under-correct on cannabis, or is weed genuinely safer for teenagers?

Adam Carolla made a sharp point on Megyn Kelly: We spent decades winning the war on cigarette smoking… then turned around and basically told everyone weed is harmless medicine. Now we have a generation that doesn’t smoke cigarettes but smokes a lot of pot — and it’s quietly messing a lot of young people up. Carolla said if you asked the average progressive mom whether she’d rather her teenage son smoke cigarettes or weed, most would pick weed. We traded one public health problem for another, this time with a trendy “natural” halo around it. I’ve seen this cultural shift happen in many places — the “weed is safe” narrative got pushed so hard that we’ve downplayed the real effects on developing brains. What do you think — did society overcorrect on cigarettes and under-correct on cannabis, or is weed genuinely safer for teenagers?

Camus

1,185,061 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

$GOOG's Ruth Porat says the biggest risk in the AI buildout is the ROI question, and focusing on short-term tactics at the cost of building a great company. "I think the biggest risk for everyone is when the question is asked, which it often is, how do you get to an ROI? That's going to force our teams to do something short-term and tactical. You can always do a cost cut to get something to drop to the bottom line, and that is not a way to build a great company." "So I think the risk is don't be so in the moment maniacally focused on what is it, but have a right mix of an engine that's continuing to drive the business, which also explains why you need to start building early for growth so that you can grow into it." ____ Follow Fireside Alpha for more daily highlights of key business and technology conversations.

$GOOG's Ruth Porat says the biggest risk in the AI buildout is the ROI question, and focusing on short-term tactics at the cost of building a great company. "I think the biggest risk for everyone is when the question is asked, which it often is, how do you get to an ROI? That's going to force our teams to do something short-term and tactical. You can always do a cost cut to get something to drop to the bottom line, and that is not a way to build a great company." "So I think the risk is don't be so in the moment maniacally focused on what is it, but have a right mix of an engine that's continuing to drive the business, which also explains why you need to start building early for growth so that you can grow into it." ____ Follow Fireside Alpha for more daily highlights of key business and technology conversations.

Fireside Alpha

38,361 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

🦊 regardless of what it is, work is something you do to eat and make a living. but if you aren’t healthy, what meaning does any of that hold? 🦊 both physically and mentally 🦊 isn’t that true? despite you working so hard 🦊 because let’s say you die tomorrow, wouldn’t it feel really unfair? 🦊 being healthy is the best thing, guys 🦊 of course, i personally don’t think i’d feel unfair because i have moas with me 🦊 i even saw moas today 🦊 but it’d be a bummer, wouldn’t it? because i’d love to live for longer, do more fun things and perform in front of moas at concerts 🦊 anyway~ but being healthy is the best thing 🦊 you guys need to be healthy 🦊 you really need to be healthy both physically and mentally 🦊 sleep well, eat well and be healthy both physically and mentally

🦊 regardless of what it is, work is something you do to eat and make a living. but if you aren’t healthy, what meaning does any of that hold? 🦊 both physically and mentally 🦊 isn’t that true? despite you working so hard 🦊 because let’s say you die tomorrow, wouldn’t it feel really unfair? 🦊 being healthy is the best thing, guys 🦊 of course, i personally don’t think i’d feel unfair because i have moas with me 🦊 i even saw moas today 🦊 but it’d be a bummer, wouldn’t it? because i’d love to live for longer, do more fun things and perform in front of moas at concerts 🦊 anyway~ but being healthy is the best thing 🦊 you guys need to be healthy 🦊 you really need to be healthy both physically and mentally 🦊 sleep well, eat well and be healthy both physically and mentally

💬

164,617 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The Onion Theory of Risk by Marc Andreessen: "I think the single biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing, both on fundraising and how they run their companies, is the relationship between risk and cash. The relationship between risk and raising cash, and then the relationship between risk and spending cash. So I've always been a fan of something that Andy Ratcliffe taught me years ago, which he called the onion theory of risk. Um, which basically is, you can think about a startup like on day one, um, as having every conceivable kind of risk, right? And you can basically just make a list of the risks. And so you've got, you know, founding team risk. You know, do the founders, are the founders gonna be able to work together? Do you have the right founders? You're gonna have product risk. You know, can you build a product? You'll have technical risk, right? Which is maybe you need a machine learning breakthrough or something to make it work. Are you gonna be able to do that? Um, you'll have, you know, launch risk. Will the launch go well? You'll have, you know, market acceptance risk. You'll have revenue risk. A big risk you get into in a lot of businesses that have a sales force is, can you actually sell the product for enough money to actually pay for the cost of sale? So you have the cost of sale risk. If you're a consumer product, you'll have a viral growth risk. Well, you get the thing of viral growth. And so, a startup at the very beginning is basically just this long list of risks. And then the way that I always think about running a startup is also the way I think about raising money, which is it's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go. And so you raise seed money in order to peel away the first two or three risks. The founding team risk, the product risk, and maybe the initial launch risk. You raise the A round to peel away the next level of product risk. Maybe you peel away some recruiting risk because you get your full engineering team built. Maybe you peel away some customer risk because you get your first five beta customers. And so basically the way to think about it is you're peeling away risk as you go. You're peeling away risk by achieving milestones. And then as you achieve milestones, you're both making progress in your business, and you're justifying raising more capital. And so you come in, and you pitch somebody like us, and you say you're raising a B round. The best way to do that with us is you say, okay, I raised a seed round, I achieved these milestones, I eliminated these risks. I raised the A round, I achieved these milestones, and I eliminated these risks. Now I'm gonna raise a B round. Here are my milestones, here are my risks. And then by the time I go to raise a seed round, here's the state that I'll be in. And then you calibrate the amount of money that you raise to spend to the risks that you're pulling out of the business. And I go through all this, in a sense this sounds kind of obvious, but I go through all this because it's a systematic way to think about how the money gets raised and deployed. As compared to so much of what's happening, especially these days, which is just, my God, let me go raise as much money as I can. Let me go build the fancy offices, let me go hire as many people as I can, and just kind of hope for the best."

The Onion Theory of Risk by Marc Andreessen: "I think the single biggest thing entrepreneurs are missing, both on fundraising and how they run their companies, is the relationship between risk and cash. The relationship between risk and raising cash, and then the relationship between risk and spending cash. So I've always been a fan of something that Andy Ratcliffe taught me years ago, which he called the onion theory of risk. Um, which basically is, you can think about a startup like on day one, um, as having every conceivable kind of risk, right? And you can basically just make a list of the risks. And so you've got, you know, founding team risk. You know, do the founders, are the founders gonna be able to work together? Do you have the right founders? You're gonna have product risk. You know, can you build a product? You'll have technical risk, right? Which is maybe you need a machine learning breakthrough or something to make it work. Are you gonna be able to do that? Um, you'll have, you know, launch risk. Will the launch go well? You'll have, you know, market acceptance risk. You'll have revenue risk. A big risk you get into in a lot of businesses that have a sales force is, can you actually sell the product for enough money to actually pay for the cost of sale? So you have the cost of sale risk. If you're a consumer product, you'll have a viral growth risk. Well, you get the thing of viral growth. And so, a startup at the very beginning is basically just this long list of risks. And then the way that I always think about running a startup is also the way I think about raising money, which is it's a process of peeling away layers of risk as you go. And so you raise seed money in order to peel away the first two or three risks. The founding team risk, the product risk, and maybe the initial launch risk. You raise the A round to peel away the next level of product risk. Maybe you peel away some recruiting risk because you get your full engineering team built. Maybe you peel away some customer risk because you get your first five beta customers. And so basically the way to think about it is you're peeling away risk as you go. You're peeling away risk by achieving milestones. And then as you achieve milestones, you're both making progress in your business, and you're justifying raising more capital. And so you come in, and you pitch somebody like us, and you say you're raising a B round. The best way to do that with us is you say, okay, I raised a seed round, I achieved these milestones, I eliminated these risks. I raised the A round, I achieved these milestones, and I eliminated these risks. Now I'm gonna raise a B round. Here are my milestones, here are my risks. And then by the time I go to raise a seed round, here's the state that I'll be in. And then you calibrate the amount of money that you raise to spend to the risks that you're pulling out of the business. And I go through all this, in a sense this sounds kind of obvious, but I go through all this because it's a systematic way to think about how the money gets raised and deployed. As compared to so much of what's happening, especially these days, which is just, my God, let me go raise as much money as I can. Let me go build the fancy offices, let me go hire as many people as I can, and just kind of hope for the best."

Founder Mode

106,909 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten