Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Does the universe bend to prayer, or does its unchanging nature offer true certainty? Explore two radical perspectives on cosmic order and our place within it. #wordwardebate #Cosmology #Philosophy #Science #Belief Follow Word War Debate on Rumble:

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

432,089 subscribers

13,684 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie #wordwardebate #Cosmology #Philosophy #Science #Belief

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ryan Gable

Ryan Gablevor 1 Tag

@WordWarDebate Prayer is meditation. It is focused internally. It is visualization.

Profilbild von SirDrew

SirDrewvor 1 Tag

The great thing about being the programmer is that you can patch the system.

Profilbild von Tradvocate

Tradvocatevor 1 Tag

Have you ever had an experience that you thought at the time might be paranormal in nature?

Profilbild von ReplyGuy™

ReplyGuy™vor 1 Tag

False choice. Unchanging laws can stay. Prayer doesn’t have to bend the universe. It can be the meeting of two poles in us — like mating. Sometimes something comes of it. That’s not the world taking requests. That’s us working inside a world that doesn’t change its nature.

Profilbild von Wesley Corbett 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

Wesley Corbett 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿vor 1 Tag

Matter is stable and highly predictable at the macroscopic scale, where classical and relativistic physics give reliable predictions. However, there are scientific reasons to think that matter might not be fundamentally stable and predictable at the microscopic scale.

Ähnliche Videos

Heated exchange at the Word War Debate. Jay Dyer critically analyzes Stefan Molyneux's arguments, pointing out a lack of evidence and a failure to define core concepts. The debate highlights Molyneux's simplistic reasoning. #wordwardebate #JayDyer #StefanMolyneux #DebateAnalysis #Philosophy #Intellectual Follow Word War Debate on Rumble:

Heated exchange at the Word War Debate. Jay Dyer critically analyzes Stefan Molyneux's arguments, pointing out a lack of evidence and a failure to define core concepts. The debate highlights Molyneux's simplistic reasoning. #wordwardebate #JayDyer #StefanMolyneux #DebateAnalysis #Philosophy #Intellectual Follow Word War Debate on Rumble:

Freedomain - with Stefan Molyneux, MA

16,833 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Why does it exist? In what way does it exist? Does it have a purpose?” : The author opens with foundational questions about the Universe’s existence, its mode of being, and potential purpose, probing the reasons and nature of reality, inviting deep philosophical inquiry. 2. “Could it have not existed at all? Could reality be such that no intelligent being would have appeared?” : These questions explore the contingency of the Universe and the possibility of a reality without intelligence, highlighting the fragility and randomness of conditions that allow for conscious life. 3. “Why does it have the ability to give birth to intelligence?” : The author questions why the Universe possesses the capacity to produce intelligent beings, emphasizing the remarkable and seemingly improbable emergence of consciousness as a key feature of reality. 4. “Why is the world the way it is? Why is it so whimsical?” : These queries address the specific nature of the Universe and its apparent capriciousness, suggesting that its structure and behavior may lack clear logic or predictability, challenging deterministic views. 5. “What is its structure? Is it finite or infinite?” : The author seeks to understand the Universe’s composition and scale, questioning whether it has boundaries or extends infinitely, reflecting on its physical and metaphysical framework. 6. “Has it always existed or does it have a beginning? Does it have a prime cause?” : These questions probe the temporal origin of the Universe and whether it stems from a primary cause, engaging with debates about eternity versus a finite beginning, like the Big Bang. 7. “What lies beyond its limits? Is it eternally evolving or destined to decline in the future?” : The author wonders about what exists outside the Universe and its long-term trajectory, contemplating whether it will continue to evolve or face eventual decline, such as heat death. 8. “Can intelligent beings live forever? Is the world knowable or not?” : The final questions address the potential immortality of intelligent life and the Universe’s comprehensibility, exploring whether consciousness can persist indefinitely and if reality can be fully understood. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author presents a series of profound questions about the Universe’s existence, purpose, structure, and capacity to produce intelligence, probing its contingency, whimsy, and knowability. These inquiries challenge us to reflect on reality’s nature, our place within it, and the possibility of eternal life or decline. They underscore the mystery of why the Universe exists as it does, ensuring humility and curiosity in the face of cosmic unknowns. By engaging with these questions, we confront the randomness and fragility of intelligent life’s emergence. This reflection inspires a quest for knowledge, blending philosophy and science to explore our origins. Ultimately, it urges us to find meaning in an uncertain, evolving cosmos, embracing the pursuit of truth as a guiding purpose.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

529,789 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Is math something humans invent—or something we discover? And why does it describe the universe so uncannily well? In this episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson sits down with mathematicians David Berlinski, Sergiu Klainerman, and Stephen C. Meyer to explore one of the deepest mysteries in science and philosophy: the reality of mathematics. From the simple certainty that 2 + 2 = 4 to the mind-bending mathematics behind black holes and quantum physics, the conversation asks why abstract numbers—created in the human mind—map so perfectly onto the physical world. Is mathematics purely logical, or does it point to a deeper structure of reality that isn't material at all? Along the way, the panel explores beauty in science, the "unreasonable effectiveness" of math, and whether the concept of materialism can really explain the world we live in. This wide-ranging discussion blends mathematics, physics, philosophy, and metaphysics into a fascinating conversation about truth, beauty, and the nature of reality itself. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge on X:

Is math something humans invent—or something we discover? And why does it describe the universe so uncannily well? In this episode of Uncommon Knowledge, Peter Robinson sits down with mathematicians David Berlinski, Sergiu Klainerman, and Stephen C. Meyer to explore one of the deepest mysteries in science and philosophy: the reality of mathematics. From the simple certainty that 2 + 2 = 4 to the mind-bending mathematics behind black holes and quantum physics, the conversation asks why abstract numbers—created in the human mind—map so perfectly onto the physical world. Is mathematics purely logical, or does it point to a deeper structure of reality that isn't material at all? Along the way, the panel explores beauty in science, the "unreasonable effectiveness" of math, and whether the concept of materialism can really explain the world we live in. This wide-ranging discussion blends mathematics, physics, philosophy, and metaphysics into a fascinating conversation about truth, beauty, and the nature of reality itself. Watch the full episode of Uncommon Knowledge on X:

Hoover Institution

51,619 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

WINNING THE WAR WITH PROPHECIES: HOW TO WAR WITH PROPHETIC WORDS You can enforce the manifestation of every good prophetic word in the place of prayer, and you can cancel or disallow the manifestation of every negative prophetic word in the place of prayer. The place of prayer is like a boardroom in the spirit—it is where you decide what becomes your reality and what you disallow. That is how you war with prophecy. In prayer, you allow and disallow. You give permission for the manifestation of God's promises, and you cancel what is not of Him. Watch the full sermon titled: "It Came To Pass (Warring With Prophecy)" on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #ItCameToPass #WarringWithProphecy #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal

WINNING THE WAR WITH PROPHECIES: HOW TO WAR WITH PROPHETIC WORDS You can enforce the manifestation of every good prophetic word in the place of prayer, and you can cancel or disallow the manifestation of every negative prophetic word in the place of prayer. The place of prayer is like a boardroom in the spirit—it is where you decide what becomes your reality and what you disallow. That is how you war with prophecy. In prayer, you allow and disallow. You give permission for the manifestation of God's promises, and you cancel what is not of Him. Watch the full sermon titled: "It Came To Pass (Warring With Prophecy)" on our YouTube channel at Koinonia Global. #ApostleJoshuaSelman #ItCameToPass #WarringWithProphecy #KoinoniaAbuja #KoinoniaGlobal

Koinonia Global

13,908 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Does a country need foreign aid to keep itself clean, we said, "No, we can actually clean it up ourselves irrespective of our economic status"". President Kagame on the philosophy behind Umuganda and Rwanda's commitment to shaping its own narrative.

"Does a country need foreign aid to keep itself clean, we said, "No, we can actually clean it up ourselves irrespective of our economic status"". President Kagame on the philosophy behind Umuganda and Rwanda's commitment to shaping its own narrative.

Presidency | Rwanda

50,904 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Iran's Ghalibaf: During the war, I posted on Twitter that the Strait of Hormuz would never return to its previous conditions, and that remains true today. However, this does not mean that we intend to act in the Strait of Hormuz contrary to international law or maritime regulations—never. We will act within the framework of international law.

Iran's Ghalibaf: During the war, I posted on Twitter that the Strait of Hormuz would never return to its previous conditions, and that remains true today. However, this does not mean that we intend to act in the Strait of Hormuz contrary to international law or maritime regulations—never. We will act within the framework of international law.

Clash Report

22,988 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

We stand with our Commander-in-Chief and our U.S. military as America confronts the Iranian regime and its nuclear ambitions. This isn’t a “forever war” — it’s ending a half-century of terror, appeasement, and attacks on Americans. President Trump isn’t an isolationist or warmonger — he’s defending the homeland, backing our allies, and stopping Iran from going nuclear. For bold conservative commentary, Trump foreign policy updates, Iran war analysis, and America First national security, subscribe on YouTube and follow on Rumble. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

We stand with our Commander-in-Chief and our U.S. military as America confronts the Iranian regime and its nuclear ambitions. This isn’t a “forever war” — it’s ending a half-century of terror, appeasement, and attacks on Americans. President Trump isn’t an isolationist or warmonger — he’s defending the homeland, backing our allies, and stopping Iran from going nuclear. For bold conservative commentary, Trump foreign policy updates, Iran war analysis, and America First national security, subscribe on YouTube and follow on Rumble. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

172,408 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Makes you sick, these Illegal Migrants are living in £600,000 while our Veterans are dying on the streets or being persecuted and harassed by Starmer. It just feels we are living in a parallel universe it really does. I sometimes think what the war generation would think! 😔

Makes you sick, these Illegal Migrants are living in £600,000 while our Veterans are dying on the streets or being persecuted and harassed by Starmer. It just feels we are living in a parallel universe it really does. I sometimes think what the war generation would think! 😔

Benonwine

61,351 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Even though his goals here are pragmatic in that he does not want to exist a tortured soul after death and desires power - the countless rituals, persecutory certainty of his fate, and his belief in demonic scrutiny and hierarchy certainly implies Alastor’s lines between physical, mortal reality and the cosmic need for ritualistic control on a metaphysical level are entirely blurred. Alastor’s arrival in Hell was designed, by him, almost prophetic in its inevitability.

Even though his goals here are pragmatic in that he does not want to exist a tortured soul after death and desires power - the countless rituals, persecutory certainty of his fate, and his belief in demonic scrutiny and hierarchy certainly implies Alastor’s lines between physical, mortal reality and the cosmic need for ritualistic control on a metaphysical level are entirely blurred. Alastor’s arrival in Hell was designed, by him, almost prophetic in its inevitability.

⊹ ࣪ ˖ ၊၊||၊ ⋆˙alastor fm 𐂂 (🎙)

27,674 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "The universe itself doesn't know what happens next. it only knows the odds. I won a Nobel proving reality runs on probability, not certainty, which means the casino isn't cheating you. it's just closer to how nature works than you are." this free lecture from 1964 is a Nobel laureate explaining that certainty is not something the universe offers, and it has been public for sixty years. at the board it's simple. Feynman showed that at the deepest level nature does not decide what will happen, only the probability of what might. Fire a single electron at two slits and no one alive can tell you where it lands, only the odds of each spot. This drove Einstein to say God does not play dice. Feynman and the experiments proved him wrong. Reality is a probability machine, all the way down. That's the whole thing, minus the mysticism. Which means the casino is not an exception to how the world works. It is a scale model of it. Nobody gets certainty, not the gambler, not the trader, not the universe. Same point as my article above: the house wins not because it knows the outcome, but because it prices the odds while you chase a sure thing that does not exist anywhere in nature. the physics is free and it has been settled for a century. what nobody can sell you is the discipline to give up the craving for certainty and act on probabilities instead. That surrender is the whole edge, and it is the hardest thing a human mind ever does.

Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize-winning physicist: "The universe itself doesn't know what happens next. it only knows the odds. I won a Nobel proving reality runs on probability, not certainty, which means the casino isn't cheating you. it's just closer to how nature works than you are." this free lecture from 1964 is a Nobel laureate explaining that certainty is not something the universe offers, and it has been public for sixty years. at the board it's simple. Feynman showed that at the deepest level nature does not decide what will happen, only the probability of what might. Fire a single electron at two slits and no one alive can tell you where it lands, only the odds of each spot. This drove Einstein to say God does not play dice. Feynman and the experiments proved him wrong. Reality is a probability machine, all the way down. That's the whole thing, minus the mysticism. Which means the casino is not an exception to how the world works. It is a scale model of it. Nobody gets certainty, not the gambler, not the trader, not the universe. Same point as my article above: the house wins not because it knows the outcome, but because it prices the odds while you chase a sure thing that does not exist anywhere in nature. the physics is free and it has been settled for a century. what nobody can sell you is the discipline to give up the craving for certainty and act on probabilities instead. That surrender is the whole edge, and it is the hardest thing a human mind ever does.

Voltex

10,965 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Does the universe have a beginning and a purpose?” : The author poses profound questions about the Universe’s temporal origin and existential purpose. This inquiry engages cosmological and metaphysical debates, prompting reflection on whether reality is finite or eternal and if it has a goal, framing diverse philosophical perspectives. 2. “a) no beginning and no purpose” : This option envisions an eternal, purposeless Universe, aligning with naturalistic views. It suggests a cosmos driven by random physical laws, where life arises by chance, denying cosmic design and emphasizing an indifferent reality shaped by unguided processes. 3. “b) no beginning, but there is a purpose” : Here, the Universe is eternal yet purposeful, implying an intrinsic goal without a starting point. This may reflect emergentist philosophies, where purpose arises from cosmic evolution, raising questions about the source of such teleological direction. 4. “c) there is a beginning, but no purpose” : This posits a Universe with a finite origin, like the Big Bang, but no purpose. It suggests a cosmos that began accidentally, governed by laws without intent, aligning with scientific models prioritizing causality over teleology. 5. “d) there is a beginning, and there is a purpose” : This asserts a Universe with both a beginning and a purpose, suggesting a created cosmos with intentional design. It resonates with theistic perspectives, implying an external agent instilling a goal at its origin. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author questions whether the Universe has a beginning and purpose, presenting four possibilities: eternal or finite, with or without purpose. This inquiry compels humanity to reflect on reality’s nature and our existential role within it. Each option challenges foundational assumptions, ensuring intellectual humility amid profound cosmic uncertainty. It inspires a synthesis of scientific inquiry and philosophical exploration to pursue truth, urging us to construct meaning in an ambiguous cosmos. By contemplating a finite or eternal Universe, we grapple with our temporal significance. The question of purpose probes whether reality aligns with a cosmic goal or remains indifferent. These reflections shape ethical and existential perspectives, guiding humanity’s quest for significance. Ultimately, the open-ended inquiry empowers us to define purpose through reason and creativity.

✅Explanation of Meaning (by parts): 1. “Does the universe have a beginning and a purpose?” : The author poses profound questions about the Universe’s temporal origin and existential purpose. This inquiry engages cosmological and metaphysical debates, prompting reflection on whether reality is finite or eternal and if it has a goal, framing diverse philosophical perspectives. 2. “a) no beginning and no purpose” : This option envisions an eternal, purposeless Universe, aligning with naturalistic views. It suggests a cosmos driven by random physical laws, where life arises by chance, denying cosmic design and emphasizing an indifferent reality shaped by unguided processes. 3. “b) no beginning, but there is a purpose” : Here, the Universe is eternal yet purposeful, implying an intrinsic goal without a starting point. This may reflect emergentist philosophies, where purpose arises from cosmic evolution, raising questions about the source of such teleological direction. 4. “c) there is a beginning, but no purpose” : This posits a Universe with a finite origin, like the Big Bang, but no purpose. It suggests a cosmos that began accidentally, governed by laws without intent, aligning with scientific models prioritizing causality over teleology. 5. “d) there is a beginning, and there is a purpose” : This asserts a Universe with both a beginning and a purpose, suggesting a created cosmos with intentional design. It resonates with theistic perspectives, implying an external agent instilling a goal at its origin. 🗝️Main Idea (refined version): The author questions whether the Universe has a beginning and purpose, presenting four possibilities: eternal or finite, with or without purpose. This inquiry compels humanity to reflect on reality’s nature and our existential role within it. Each option challenges foundational assumptions, ensuring intellectual humility amid profound cosmic uncertainty. It inspires a synthesis of scientific inquiry and philosophical exploration to pursue truth, urging us to construct meaning in an ambiguous cosmos. By contemplating a finite or eternal Universe, we grapple with our temporal significance. The question of purpose probes whether reality aligns with a cosmic goal or remains indifferent. These reflections shape ethical and existential perspectives, guiding humanity’s quest for significance. Ultimately, the open-ended inquiry empowers us to define purpose through reason and creativity.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

3,769,466 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Journalist: You are lobbying more weapons to be sent to Ukraine, how do you justify that morally... you think more weapons will wind down the war? There’s a special place in hell for journalists who sit safely under the protection of the strongest country on earth, the most heavily armed, and by some cosmic coincidence, one that never hosts wars on its own soil. And from that perch, they dare to ask how arming Ukraine aligns with peace. It does, my sweet summer child. It absolutely does. Yes, we don’t want war. We never did. But Russia invaded our country, and if we don’t defend ourselves, we die. We need weapons for survival, and to make sure we don’t walk around with targets on our foreheads ever again.

Journalist: You are lobbying more weapons to be sent to Ukraine, how do you justify that morally... you think more weapons will wind down the war? There’s a special place in hell for journalists who sit safely under the protection of the strongest country on earth, the most heavily armed, and by some cosmic coincidence, one that never hosts wars on its own soil. And from that perch, they dare to ask how arming Ukraine aligns with peace. It does, my sweet summer child. It absolutely does. Yes, we don’t want war. We never did. But Russia invaded our country, and if we don’t defend ourselves, we die. We need weapons for survival, and to make sure we don’t walk around with targets on our foreheads ever again.

Kate from Kharkiv

583,919 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

MONDAY’S GOING UNDERGROUND SEASON FINALE Prof. John Mearsheimer will join us to look back at 2025, a year of: -Genocide and fake ceasefire in Gaza -Continuing proxy war on Russia through Ukraine -A stalled, yet looming regime change war against Venezuela🇻🇪 and more. Don’t miss it, follow Going Underground on X to watch the full interview on Monday, or follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

MONDAY’S GOING UNDERGROUND SEASON FINALE Prof. John Mearsheimer will join us to look back at 2025, a year of: -Genocide and fake ceasefire in Gaza -Continuing proxy war on Russia through Ukraine -A stalled, yet looming regime change war against Venezuela🇻🇪 and more. Don’t miss it, follow Going Underground on X to watch the full interview on Monday, or follow our Rumble channel, link below in the replies👇

Afshin Rattansi

10,998 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

“We sent a warship on a defensive mission to defend British interests in Cyprus. Is it there yet?” Does the UK have the hard power to defend itself – or has its response to the Iran war shown how "impotent" our military is? emily m | Jon Sopel | Lewis Goodall

“We sent a warship on a defensive mission to defend British interests in Cyprus. Is it there yet?” Does the UK have the hard power to defend itself – or has its response to the Iran war shown how "impotent" our military is? emily m | Jon Sopel | Lewis Goodall

The News Agents

15,589 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

It’s time for We the People to stand united and back our U.S. military as President Trump confronts the Iranian regime and its terror network. With top Iranian leaders eliminated and global allies rallying, this is a pivotal moment for American strength and national security. While Democrats, Marxists, Islamists, and media elites attack from within, patriots must speak up. Support our troops. Defend America. For unfiltered conservative commentary, Trump updates, Iran war analysis, and breaking geopolitical news, subscribe on YouTube and follow on Rumble. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

It’s time for We the People to stand united and back our U.S. military as President Trump confronts the Iranian regime and its terror network. With top Iranian leaders eliminated and global allies rallying, this is a pivotal moment for American strength and national security. While Democrats, Marxists, Islamists, and media elites attack from within, patriots must speak up. Support our troops. Defend America. For unfiltered conservative commentary, Trump updates, Iran war analysis, and breaking geopolitical news, subscribe on YouTube and follow on Rumble. To watch the entire episode, go to: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

156,979 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

REPORTER: "Pope Leo said yesterday, and I quote him, 'God does not listen to the prayer of those who waged war.' Can you comment on that?" KAROLINE LEAVITT: "Our nation was a nation founded 250 years ago, almost, on Judeo-Christian values. And we’ve seen, presidents, we’ve seen, the leaders of the Department of War, and we’ve seen our troops go to prayer, during the most turbulent times in our nation’s history." "I don’t think there’s anything wrong with our military leaders or with the president calling on the American people to pray for our service members and those who are serving our country overseas. In fact, I think it’s a very noble thing to do."

REPORTER: "Pope Leo said yesterday, and I quote him, 'God does not listen to the prayer of those who waged war.' Can you comment on that?" KAROLINE LEAVITT: "Our nation was a nation founded 250 years ago, almost, on Judeo-Christian values. And we’ve seen, presidents, we’ve seen, the leaders of the Department of War, and we’ve seen our troops go to prayer, during the most turbulent times in our nation’s history." "I don’t think there’s anything wrong with our military leaders or with the president calling on the American people to pray for our service members and those who are serving our country overseas. In fact, I think it’s a very noble thing to do."

Fox News

3,286,911 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

INSECURE MODI DOESN'T WANT LoP TO OFFER DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES TO VISITING DIGNITARIES. Rahul Gandhi on Putin visit: "We have relations with everyone. LoP gives a different perspective. We too represent India. It is not just the Govt which does it. Govt doesn't want the Opposition to meet people coming from outside...Modi ji and Foreign Ministry don't follow this norm. It is their insecurity."

INSECURE MODI DOESN'T WANT LoP TO OFFER DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES TO VISITING DIGNITARIES. Rahul Gandhi on Putin visit: "We have relations with everyone. LoP gives a different perspective. We too represent India. It is not just the Govt which does it. Govt doesn't want the Opposition to meet people coming from outside...Modi ji and Foreign Ministry don't follow this norm. It is their insecurity."

Rahul Shivshankar

61,874 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I take on one of the most powerful—and most misunderstood—words in our political language: EQUALITY. What does it actually mean? And why does it matter so much right now? From Washington, D.C. to classrooms, media platforms, and political debates across the United States, I explain how the concept of “equality” can lead to two very different outcomes. In the wrong hands, it can justify tyranny, totalitarianism, and the destruction of individual freedom. But in the right hands—properly understood—it can mean justice, opportunity, and respect for every individual as a human being. The problem is, too many people are throwing the word around without understanding its roots, its implications, or its consequences. I challenge the current media and podcast culture, where complex ideas like this are rarely explored in depth, and instead get reduced to slogans and soundbites. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I take on one of the most powerful—and most misunderstood—words in our political language: EQUALITY. What does it actually mean? And why does it matter so much right now? From Washington, D.C. to classrooms, media platforms, and political debates across the United States, I explain how the concept of “equality” can lead to two very different outcomes. In the wrong hands, it can justify tyranny, totalitarianism, and the destruction of individual freedom. But in the right hands—properly understood—it can mean justice, opportunity, and respect for every individual as a human being. The problem is, too many people are throwing the word around without understanding its roots, its implications, or its consequences. I challenge the current media and podcast culture, where complex ideas like this are rarely explored in depth, and instead get reduced to slogans and soundbites. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

20,475 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten