Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Dominion's ImageCast Evolution (ICE) hybrid voting machine has a built-in physical ability to mark or add votes to your paper ballot AFTER you've reviewed and cast it, and you'll never see the final version. Bidirectional paper path flaw. Scanner and printer share the same feed, allowing the device to...

TheSCIF's profile picture

The SCIF

306,177 subscribers

11,818 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.
9:39

Dominion Voting Machines can secretly alter your Ballot AFTER you've cast it. Princeton Prof. Andrew Appel exposes the jaw-dropping truth on the ImageCast Evolution machine. This "hybrid" beast scans your vote but has the sneaky power to print extra marks without you ever knowing. What's even more alarming is that they even programmed it to NOT fill in the bubble neatly so it would mimic a human being filling in a bubble not to rise suspicion and disguise the fact that a machine marked Ballot and not a human. This feature is available on Dominion voting machines, particularly models like the ImageCast Evolution (ICE) and ImageCast X (ICX), which have been used in various U.S. elections. The ICE can physically print additional votes onto a paper ballot after the voter inserts it for scanning and after they've reviewed it, if the machine is compromised by malware. This flaw stems from the machine's hybrid scanner/printer design, making it possible for hacked software to add or change votes undetected by the voter. Hackers could exploit security weaknesses in the machine or the connected election management system (EMS) to install malicious software. For the ICX, this includes an arbitrary-code-execution flaw that allows malware to propagate from the central EMS to all machines in a jurisdiction without needing physical access to each one. In models like the ImageCast Precinct (ICP) and ICE, a weak PRNG can reveal the order in which ballots were cast, potentially deanonymizing voters and linking ballots to individuals in scenarios where public ballot data is available. CISA identified nine vulnerabilities in certain ICX versions, including issues with authentication, encryption, and file validation. Exploiting these typically requires physical access to devices, EMS, or the ability to modify files before upload, but they could allow tampering if access is gained. In some configurations, like Georgia's ICX, attackers could alter QR codes on printed ballots to change encoded votes, though this would be detectable via risk-limiting audits (RLAs) since the human-readable text remains authoritative. Issues like those in Puerto Rico's 2024 primaries, where Dominion software produced lower or reversed vote totals compared to paper ballots, highlight potential for misconfigured systems to cause tabulation errors. The ICX includes extra Android apps, such as a terminal emulator providing root access, which could bypass controls and increase attack surfaces if exploited. This can also potentially make it able to be controlled remotely from anywhere. The truth is, all machines must go. Paper ballots and hand counts with massive oversight is the only safe way.

The SCIF

39,311 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.
4:10

An Alabama election worker went across the street and made a copy of a ballot on regular notebook paper and fed it into an ES&S election machine and it read and counted the ballot without any issues. Dominion voting machines aren't the only machines compromised, ES&S machines have the same issues and features. Dominion also has machines that are able to scan and mark ballots after the last time a voter touches their ballot. They can even change the settings to mimic a human to purposely not fill in the bubble neatly when selecting a candidate. What's also concerning is Georgia's reversal rates on their machines, which was around 15% to 20% in the 2020 election. What do these machines need to do when marking a ballot? Reverse the ballot and the refeeds itself before marking the ballot.

The SCIF

74,294 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!
1:34

DOMINION Voting System's Executives admitted in 2015 that their machines can not, and do not check for fraudulent ballots when asked point blank at a press conference. This also proves when an election worker from Alabama printed ballots from across the street on notebook paper and Dominion's machine accepted every single one. Based on technical reports, security analyses, and official documentation, the ICX itself does not have built-in capabilities to autonomously determine if a ballot is fraudulent in terms of paper authenticity, watermarks, or other physical markers. Instead, fraud prevention in Dominion systems relies on procedural safeguards like voter verification of the printed ballot before casting, post-election audits of paper records, chain-of-custody protocols for ballots, and physical security measures around the machines. Some analyses have identified vulnerabilities in the ICX that could potentially allow manipulation if an attacker has physical access, but these do not involve the machine detecting or rejecting fraudulent ballots based on paper properties—detection would require human-led audits or recounts, which solely relies on trust of the people overseeing an election. There is no evidence that Canon scanner technology (likely referring to Canon's document scanners, such as the DR-G1130 models used in Dominion's ImageCast Central systems for high-volume scanning) has ever been installed in "every machine" for the purpose of checking watermarks or ballot paper authenticity. Canon scanners in Dominion setups are primarily for optical scanning of marked ballots to count votes, not for forensic-level paper verification. This is HUGE!

The SCIF

35,506 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.
4:38

Dominion voting machines in Otero County, New Mexico, have the ability to not just read a ballot, but mark a ballot as well. The more concerning discovery was that the machine was found to be specifically programmed to "mark" a ballot selection box to mimic a human, not staying within the lines, programmed to literally be "sloppy" and not neatly fill in the bubble, in order to disguise that the machine was marking the ballot, instead of the voter. Remote access was also discovered, along with multiple ports on the machines for ethernet internet and USB access along with software designed to purposely keep the voting machine screen "asleep" or "off" when the machine is being remotely accessed from an off-site location to alter votes without anyone at the physical voting machine location ever knowing it was even happening. The only reason you would ever purposely program the machine to disguise that a machine is filling in a selection on a ballot over a person is if you were going to commit fraud on a massive scale. The device also ejects and re-inserts ballots for vote verification, a step Jeffery Lendberg, and David Clements stated could enable fraud. Some reversal rates reached up to 20% in certain states, which is more than enough to change the outcome of an election.

The SCIF

140,595 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.
6:39

The Halderman Report proved that votes can be ALTERED on Dominion machines, revealing critical flaws and features that let insiders flip votes either on-site or remotely, even subverting paper trails. Dominion voting machines, specifically the ImageCast X and ICX ballot-marking devices, have severe, exploitable security flaws that allow votes to be altered. All used in the 2020 election and others. Malicious actors, corrupt insiders, including hackers with physical access, corrupt election officials, or remote attackers via election management systems, can change election results without detection. These vulnerabilities undermine the entire election process, subvert audit trails and paper records, and prove the machines cannot be trusted. The flaws pose an ongoing threat to U.S. elections with obvious strong implication tied to the stolen 2020 election. Arbitrary code execution is extremely vulnerable allowing an attacker to install malicious software on the machines. This can be done with temporary physical access, even by a voter at a polling place, or remotely by compromising the central election management system, the EMS, then spreading malware to every ballot-marking device in a jurisdiction. If one computer or machine is attacked or compromised, then ALL of the machines on the network are compromised. There is a vast variety of vote alterations capable. Malware can modify the QR codes on the paper ballots printed by the machines, effectively changing the recorded votes while the paper trail appears normal to voters and auditors. Multiple severe security flaws discovered across nearly every part of the exposed system, including how election definitions are loaded. Proof-of-concept attacks were demonstrated by Halderman and his team showing it was possible to secretly alter votes on test machines. These attacks can bypass procedural protections practiced by states, logic & accuracy testing, chain-of-custody, etc. The report concludes that the vulnerabilities are serious enough to allow large-scale vote manipulation in our elections and most likely already have before and post 2020 election.

The SCIF

19,397 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.
2:44

2026 Investigation into the Fulton County 2020 Election found that Fulton County destroyed 374,128 ballot images for nearly all in-person voting, and selectively and willfully destroyed 132,280 electronic absentee ballot image authentication files, or "SHA" files, for the 2020 Election, which are able to prove that ballots were tampered with, altered, or replaced. These are HUGE violations of both state and federal violations. Nearly HALF of the ballot images for the 5 MILLION ballots cast across the state of Georgia for the 2020 Election were destroyed. Election data must be saved up to 22 months. If you wanted to cover up election fraud, this is how you would do it. Simply put, ballot images, not the paper ballot, is used to count the vote, and without the ballot images, no votes could be counted, audits can NOT be conducted or could be accurate, votes can't be authenticated, and elections could not be certified. Fulton County admitted that they "failed to preserve the majority of ballot images," in the Curling v. Raffensperger case. The Secretary of State's General Counsel, Charlene McGowan, has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal the unlawful actions of country and state, to even include giving false statements of fact and law under oath, saying that Georgia Law did NOT require ballot images to be preserved from the 2020 Election. So every ballot has a "ballot image," which is what is counted for the vote and used to authenticate the vote. The "SHA" authentication files are like a "finger print" which is assigned to each ballot as it is scanned to VALIDATE the ballot image in the even of an audit or investigation to determine if a ballot image has been tampered with, altered, or replaced... These files do not "disappear" by accident, and were manually wiped to prevent ANY authentication of ballots, along with the ballot images, covering up election fraud. They knew EXACTLY what they were doing. The 2020 Election was stolen.

The SCIF

161,616 просмотров • 12 дней назад

The Clark County Election Department is introducing a new step in the in-person voting process in 2026. The check-in process and voting machines (now called ballot marking devices) will remain the same as in recent elections. But now, once a voter makes their selections, they get a printout of their ballot to review before submitting it through the new tabulators. This change aligns with statewide security standards and national best practices. By producing a paper ballot, every voter can easily review their selections before casting their vote. Paper records are then safely stored for audits and recounts if needed.
0:52

The Clark County Election Department is introducing a new step in the in-person voting process in 2026. The check-in process and voting machines (now called ballot marking devices) will remain the same as in recent elections. But now, once a voter makes their selections, they get a printout of their ballot to review before submitting it through the new tabulators. This change aligns with statewide security standards and national best practices. By producing a paper ballot, every voter can easily review their selections before casting their vote. Paper records are then safely stored for audits and recounts if needed.

Clark County Nevada

18,982 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

#WATCH | Presiding Officer for Chandigarh Mayor election, Anil Masih says, "...A total of 36 votes were cast. When we were issuing the ballot papers, a few AAP and Congress Councillors were concerned that the papers had spots and marks - so, they asked me to change around 11 ballot papers. I honoured their request and kept the ballot papers in question on the side and issued them fresh ballot papers...When I finished the counting of votes, I was about to declare the results as per the process. BJP candidate Manoj Sonkar received 16 votes and AAP candidate Kuldeep received 12 votes; 8 votes were invalid...I asked the polling agent of AAP-Congress candidate to check the ballot paper but instead of doing that AAP and a few Congress councillors jumped on the table to disrupt the process, captured the ballot papers and tore them up...AAP and Congress hatched a conspiracy to derail the election process..."
6:50

#WATCH | Presiding Officer for Chandigarh Mayor election, Anil Masih says, "...A total of 36 votes were cast. When we were issuing the ballot papers, a few AAP and Congress Councillors were concerned that the papers had spots and marks - so, they asked me to change around 11 ballot papers. I honoured their request and kept the ballot papers in question on the side and issued them fresh ballot papers...When I finished the counting of votes, I was about to declare the results as per the process. BJP candidate Manoj Sonkar received 16 votes and AAP candidate Kuldeep received 12 votes; 8 votes were invalid...I asked the polling agent of AAP-Congress candidate to check the ballot paper but instead of doing that AAP and a few Congress councillors jumped on the table to disrupt the process, captured the ballot papers and tore them up...AAP and Congress hatched a conspiracy to derail the election process..."

ANI

2,013,442 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Breaking Down Georgia's MASSIVE 2020 Election FRAUD with over 140 election laws and rules broken or violated. Watch them panic and try to shut the arguments down. Shocking Admissions from the State Election Board Hearing, board member Janice Johnston and officials reveal Fulton County's "improper procedures" and duplicative ballot images—scanned multiple times—during the presidential recount. Three separate counts yielded wildly inconsistent results, raising red flags about scanner errors and hidden ballots and potential manipulation. Yet, despite clear evidence of irregularities, no referral to the AG for prosecution? Justice is being purposely derailed because the ones at the top are also involved in the FRAUD. This isn't just a glitch; it's a systemic failure exposing potential high-level cover-ups involving the ones at the top, on the Election Board, the governors, Dominion, foreign countries, and the election officials themselves, in one massive election fraud operation just like Joe Biden said he put together. This is all the Ballot Categories and Counts from the Fulton County 2020 Presidential Election based on all of their own available data from the Georgia State Election Board hearing and related intel: Total Ballots Cast (Initial/Original Tabulation): 524,659 First Machine Count (Election Night): Total Cast Vote: Records: 528,776 Trump Votes: 137,240 Biden Votes: 381,144 Jorgensen Votes: 6,275 Hand Count Audit (Risk-Limiting Audit): Reported Total: Votes: 525,293 Trump Votes: 137,620 Biden Votes: 381,179 Jorgensen Votes: 6,494 Second Machine Count (Recount):Total Cast Vote: Records: 527,925 Trump Votes: 137,247 (+7 from first count) Biden Votes: 380,212 (-932 from first count) Jorgensen Votes: 6,320 (+45 from first count) Key Discrepancies and Irregularities are MASSIVE: Missing Ballot Images: First Machine Count: 376,863 missing images (out of 528,776 records) Second Machine Count: 17,852 missing images (out of 527,925 records) Duplicate Ballot Images/Scans (suggesting potential multiple counting): 3,075 duplicate images reported during recount 2,871 ballots/BMD printouts identified as counted 2-3 times in second machine count (sample analysis) 916 hand-marked paper ballots among duplicates 16,807 duplicate rows in hand count audit spreadsheet (out of 41,881 total rows) Other Discrepancies: Difference between original tabulation and hand count audit: 634 votes (0.12%) Adjusted error after omissions: 4,569 votes (0.87%) Cast vote records difference between first and second machine counts: 851 VIOLATIONS of election laws/rules: 140 Omitted Absentee Ballot Batch Sheets (ABBSs) in audit: 11 (depriving ~1,582 Trump votes, ~2,288 Biden votes, ~65 Jorgensen votes; total ~3,900 votes omitted) Biden's Georgia margin ~12,000 votes; Multiple different results and evidence of duplicates potentially effected tabulated results but is not "conclusive," but improper procedures are confirmed which point to potential fraud. But need the original ballots to confirm which they will not hand over. Not adding or including the potential of fake ballots, manipulated adjudication from on site or remotely, and not counting the recent 315,000 unauthenticated votes. Most IMPORTANTLY the actual physical ballots have still not been located or were given to the parties to examine for authenticity, conformation, matching signatures, etc., because they refused to hand them over to inspect which is now in a legal proceeding to hand them over. Why won't they hand the ballots over to be inspected? This should tell you everything you need to know and the most crucial aspect of the entire situation. They know they are fraudulent ballots or they already destroyed them, period.
8:06

Breaking Down Georgia's MASSIVE 2020 Election FRAUD with over 140 election laws and rules broken or violated. Watch them panic and try to shut the arguments down. Shocking Admissions from the State Election Board Hearing, board member Janice Johnston and officials reveal Fulton County's "improper procedures" and duplicative ballot images—scanned multiple times—during the presidential recount. Three separate counts yielded wildly inconsistent results, raising red flags about scanner errors and hidden ballots and potential manipulation. Yet, despite clear evidence of irregularities, no referral to the AG for prosecution? Justice is being purposely derailed because the ones at the top are also involved in the FRAUD. This isn't just a glitch; it's a systemic failure exposing potential high-level cover-ups involving the ones at the top, on the Election Board, the governors, Dominion, foreign countries, and the election officials themselves, in one massive election fraud operation just like Joe Biden said he put together. This is all the Ballot Categories and Counts from the Fulton County 2020 Presidential Election based on all of their own available data from the Georgia State Election Board hearing and related intel: Total Ballots Cast (Initial/Original Tabulation): 524,659 First Machine Count (Election Night): Total Cast Vote: Records: 528,776 Trump Votes: 137,240 Biden Votes: 381,144 Jorgensen Votes: 6,275 Hand Count Audit (Risk-Limiting Audit): Reported Total: Votes: 525,293 Trump Votes: 137,620 Biden Votes: 381,179 Jorgensen Votes: 6,494 Second Machine Count (Recount):Total Cast Vote: Records: 527,925 Trump Votes: 137,247 (+7 from first count) Biden Votes: 380,212 (-932 from first count) Jorgensen Votes: 6,320 (+45 from first count) Key Discrepancies and Irregularities are MASSIVE: Missing Ballot Images: First Machine Count: 376,863 missing images (out of 528,776 records) Second Machine Count: 17,852 missing images (out of 527,925 records) Duplicate Ballot Images/Scans (suggesting potential multiple counting): 3,075 duplicate images reported during recount 2,871 ballots/BMD printouts identified as counted 2-3 times in second machine count (sample analysis) 916 hand-marked paper ballots among duplicates 16,807 duplicate rows in hand count audit spreadsheet (out of 41,881 total rows) Other Discrepancies: Difference between original tabulation and hand count audit: 634 votes (0.12%) Adjusted error after omissions: 4,569 votes (0.87%) Cast vote records difference between first and second machine counts: 851 VIOLATIONS of election laws/rules: 140 Omitted Absentee Ballot Batch Sheets (ABBSs) in audit: 11 (depriving ~1,582 Trump votes, ~2,288 Biden votes, ~65 Jorgensen votes; total ~3,900 votes omitted) Biden's Georgia margin ~12,000 votes; Multiple different results and evidence of duplicates potentially effected tabulated results but is not "conclusive," but improper procedures are confirmed which point to potential fraud. But need the original ballots to confirm which they will not hand over. Not adding or including the potential of fake ballots, manipulated adjudication from on site or remotely, and not counting the recent 315,000 unauthenticated votes. Most IMPORTANTLY the actual physical ballots have still not been located or were given to the parties to examine for authenticity, conformation, matching signatures, etc., because they refused to hand them over to inspect which is now in a legal proceeding to hand them over. Why won't they hand the ballots over to be inspected? This should tell you everything you need to know and the most crucial aspect of the entire situation. They know they are fraudulent ballots or they already destroyed them, period.

The SCIF

40,962 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

When a voter was NOT in the poll book, they proceeded to manually enter these into the electronic poll book where then they would come up on the screen." This manual intervention, without consistent verification, opens the door to massive fraud. "We as a poll challenger are supposed to verify the name [and] address on the ballot to the electronic poll book, and if it is not there, then it is supposed to be in a paper poll book." Yet, at no point were they "able to physically see the ballot and then see it in the electronic poll book." "Any time as a challenger I tried to look at the ballot and then try to verify it, I would get two or three of the poll workers literally screaming at me to get back six feet." This not only created a hostile environment but physically prevented close inspection. How many people running our elections are actually engaged in fraud? The number has got to be off the charts!
2:17

When a voter was NOT in the poll book, they proceeded to manually enter these into the electronic poll book where then they would come up on the screen." This manual intervention, without consistent verification, opens the door to massive fraud. "We as a poll challenger are supposed to verify the name [and] address on the ballot to the electronic poll book, and if it is not there, then it is supposed to be in a paper poll book." Yet, at no point were they "able to physically see the ballot and then see it in the electronic poll book." "Any time as a challenger I tried to look at the ballot and then try to verify it, I would get two or three of the poll workers literally screaming at me to get back six feet." This not only created a hostile environment but physically prevented close inspection. How many people running our elections are actually engaged in fraud? The number has got to be off the charts!

The SCIF

30,877 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.
4:18

The Dominion ICX machines are able to scan, tabulate, and MARK ballots AFTER the last time a voter handles their ballot. You are even able to program the machine to mimic a "human," not neatly filling in the bubble to hide the fact that a machine filled in the selection. This combined with the engineered features to purposely cause errors in order to send ballots into adjudication where bulk batches of ballots can be changed and marked at the click of a button with NO oversight, NO transparency, and NO audit trail is the perfect combination to rig and steal an election. This is just ONE method of FRAUD that was performed in order to steal the 2020 election. With mail-in fraudulent ballots, voters, and remote access on top, you're guaranteed to never lose an election again.

The SCIF

30,964 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The stolen 2020 election was a massive regime change operation conducted on U.S. soil through election fraud and psychological warfare that happened not just in the U.S., but around the world using the same playbook. Our elections consist of data, electronic data. Paper ballots are put through the machines and turned into a ballot image, the ballot image is data, and "data" can be manipulated with something as simple as a USB drive, virtual machine, or internet connection, especially when our voting machines have built in backdoors with remote internet access. Add noncitizens, dirty voter rolls, mail-in ballots, laws that allow ballots to be counted for weeks after Election Day, a dirty intelligence agency, foreign connections, corrupt judges, corrupt election workers, compromised machines, and you have a perfect recipe for a successful regime change operation.
16:02

The stolen 2020 election was a massive regime change operation conducted on U.S. soil through election fraud and psychological warfare that happened not just in the U.S., but around the world using the same playbook. Our elections consist of data, electronic data. Paper ballots are put through the machines and turned into a ballot image, the ballot image is data, and "data" can be manipulated with something as simple as a USB drive, virtual machine, or internet connection, especially when our voting machines have built in backdoors with remote internet access. Add noncitizens, dirty voter rolls, mail-in ballots, laws that allow ballots to be counted for weeks after Election Day, a dirty intelligence agency, foreign connections, corrupt judges, corrupt election workers, compromised machines, and you have a perfect recipe for a successful regime change operation.

The SCIF

54,485 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Dominion Voting System's built-in feature to flip votes exposed. Whoever has access to the machine can flip thousands of votes at the click of a button, on top of the built-in remotely accessible backdoors. They knew this and kept it a secret, even lied under oath, until it was exposed.
6:16

Dominion Voting System's built-in feature to flip votes exposed. Whoever has access to the machine can flip thousands of votes at the click of a button, on top of the built-in remotely accessible backdoors. They knew this and kept it a secret, even lied under oath, until it was exposed.

The SCIF

118,336 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Dominion Voting Systems Director demonstrates how operators can manually enter votes into their machines, and explains that it's a feature built into Dominion's software. Through the adjudication process, election workers can literally flip thousands of votes from Trump to Biden with the click of a button which we've seen demonstrated numerous times by election officials. Even worse, election workers witnessed NO security on the ballot boxes, and no spreadsheets or backlogs to keep track of the totals of each ballot box. Only a posted sticky note. The Data Entry Computers also had NO security with the login password information written on a sticky note next to the computer for anyone to access. An election official also witnessed alleged workers from the Data Entry companies on site, and when Trump was ahead 350,000 votes, with 79% of the votes reported, swing states and places like Fulton County in Georgia, were shut down. Multiple counties also found ballots filled out by machines, and also found huge differences in the recounts to the official counts. The margin of victory in Georgia was only 11,779 votes.
5:47

Dominion Voting Systems Director demonstrates how operators can manually enter votes into their machines, and explains that it's a feature built into Dominion's software. Through the adjudication process, election workers can literally flip thousands of votes from Trump to Biden with the click of a button which we've seen demonstrated numerous times by election officials. Even worse, election workers witnessed NO security on the ballot boxes, and no spreadsheets or backlogs to keep track of the totals of each ballot box. Only a posted sticky note. The Data Entry Computers also had NO security with the login password information written on a sticky note next to the computer for anyone to access. An election official also witnessed alleged workers from the Data Entry companies on site, and when Trump was ahead 350,000 votes, with 79% of the votes reported, swing states and places like Fulton County in Georgia, were shut down. Multiple counties also found ballots filled out by machines, and also found huge differences in the recounts to the official counts. The margin of victory in Georgia was only 11,779 votes.

The SCIF

14,533 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Georgia's 2020 election had 1,726,651 missing original ballot images. You can NOT certify or audit votes without these images, many were destroyed or "lost." 70 Georgia counties could not produce original ballot images for the November 2020 election, 36 counties were missing 100% of all original ballot images. These images MUST be retained up to 22 months by law. These ballot images were deleted because it proved the massive amount of fraud, and they had to get rid of the evidence. 5,026,684 total cast ballots from the Secretary of State, 3,300,033 original ballot images received by VoterGA. The amount of "anomalies," impossible occurrences, and patterns of fraud, happening all throughout the country clearly shows a stolen election.
3:04

Georgia's 2020 election had 1,726,651 missing original ballot images. You can NOT certify or audit votes without these images, many were destroyed or "lost." 70 Georgia counties could not produce original ballot images for the November 2020 election, 36 counties were missing 100% of all original ballot images. These images MUST be retained up to 22 months by law. These ballot images were deleted because it proved the massive amount of fraud, and they had to get rid of the evidence. 5,026,684 total cast ballots from the Secretary of State, 3,300,033 original ballot images received by VoterGA. The amount of "anomalies," impossible occurrences, and patterns of fraud, happening all throughout the country clearly shows a stolen election.

The SCIF

95,582 просмотров • 16 дней назад

In Maricopa County, Arizona, during the 2020 election audit, pallets with thousands of duplicate ballots were found with NO serial numbers, which are crucial for creating a paper trail for audits, especially with duplicate ballots. If the corresponding serial numbers for the duplicated ballots are NOT on the ballots, there is NO way to determine if that ballot was tabulated and counted 1x or 1000x, which opens the door to massive ballot fraud.
3:05

In Maricopa County, Arizona, during the 2020 election audit, pallets with thousands of duplicate ballots were found with NO serial numbers, which are crucial for creating a paper trail for audits, especially with duplicate ballots. If the corresponding serial numbers for the duplicated ballots are NOT on the ballots, there is NO way to determine if that ballot was tabulated and counted 1x or 1000x, which opens the door to massive ballot fraud.

The SCIF

16,336 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A woman who died in 2012 was given credit for voting in the Fulton County General Election in 2023. Fulton County stated it was because of "redistricting issues." Someone please explain how someone who died well over a decade ago, voted in the 2023 GA Election, and how it has ANYTHING to do with a "redistricting issue?" This is why they don't want to purge or for you to even see the dirty voter rolls. They need dead voters to produce fake votes. On top of that, QR codes are printed on ballots that YOU can't read. Once you make a selection on the screen, a ballot is printed out with a QR code on it, which contains your selection. If the system is altered, you can have the QR code be printed for whatever candidate you choose and the voter would never know. The QR codes are easily able to be copied as well. How long has Fulton County been rigging elections? No wonder they didn't want us to have the ballots, erased the logs, and original ballot images.
1:43

A woman who died in 2012 was given credit for voting in the Fulton County General Election in 2023. Fulton County stated it was because of "redistricting issues." Someone please explain how someone who died well over a decade ago, voted in the 2023 GA Election, and how it has ANYTHING to do with a "redistricting issue?" This is why they don't want to purge or for you to even see the dirty voter rolls. They need dead voters to produce fake votes. On top of that, QR codes are printed on ballots that YOU can't read. Once you make a selection on the screen, a ballot is printed out with a QR code on it, which contains your selection. If the system is altered, you can have the QR code be printed for whatever candidate you choose and the voter would never know. The QR codes are easily able to be copied as well. How long has Fulton County been rigging elections? No wonder they didn't want us to have the ballots, erased the logs, and original ballot images.

The SCIF

63,562 просмотров • 23 дней назад

BREAKING.🚨 New statement released on voting machines in Laurel County, Kentucky that reportedly would not let voters elect Donald Trump for President and instead were automatically selecting Kamala Harris. The voting machine "glitch" was *CONFIRMED.* "The Attorney General’s office has been to the vote center to check the device that has been shown across social media today. In full disclosure, after several minutes of attempting to recreate the scenario, it did occur. This was accomplished by hitting some area in between the boxes," Laurel County Clerk Tony Brown said in a statement. "After that we tried for several minutes to do it again and could not. Since this is going out across the USA and the world, I want to explain to everyone that this is a ballot marking device. You insert your blank ballot into it to vote your specific ballot for your precinct. It shows you who you have chosen for each race and notifies you if you didn’t make a selection in a race before it allows the voter to continue to the next page. When you come to the end of the ballot it shows you how you voted in every race and issue. It confirms with each voter that they are satisfied with their selections twice before printing the ballot." Isn't it odd how all of these voting machine "glitches" only go one way?
0:22

BREAKING.🚨 New statement released on voting machines in Laurel County, Kentucky that reportedly would not let voters elect Donald Trump for President and instead were automatically selecting Kamala Harris. The voting machine "glitch" was *CONFIRMED.* "The Attorney General’s office has been to the vote center to check the device that has been shown across social media today. In full disclosure, after several minutes of attempting to recreate the scenario, it did occur. This was accomplished by hitting some area in between the boxes," Laurel County Clerk Tony Brown said in a statement. "After that we tried for several minutes to do it again and could not. Since this is going out across the USA and the world, I want to explain to everyone that this is a ballot marking device. You insert your blank ballot into it to vote your specific ballot for your precinct. It shows you who you have chosen for each race and notifies you if you didn’t make a selection in a race before it allows the voter to continue to the next page. When you come to the end of the ballot it shows you how you voted in every race and issue. It confirms with each voter that they are satisfied with their selections twice before printing the ballot." Isn't it odd how all of these voting machine "glitches" only go one way?

Kyle Becker

3,292,047 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sprint and Verizon neatly labeled ethernet ports were found directly on U.S. electronic voting machines, when they told you that the machines weren't connected to the internet, even under oath. Computer experts made their own search program and found over 35 voting machines across the U.S. still connected to the internet, even though there are no elections going on. Experts also found that the software used in our elections was able to remotely access voting machines and manipulate votes without even waking up the machine, keeping the screen black at the physical location of the voting machine. This would mean nobody would even know someone was accessing the machine remotely and making changes. This should tell you everything you need to know. Pass the SAVE ACT, get rid of ALL mail-in ballots, electronic voting machines, and 3rd party companies connected to our elections, and have Congress pass a law to make states use paper only.
4:43

Sprint and Verizon neatly labeled ethernet ports were found directly on U.S. electronic voting machines, when they told you that the machines weren't connected to the internet, even under oath. Computer experts made their own search program and found over 35 voting machines across the U.S. still connected to the internet, even though there are no elections going on. Experts also found that the software used in our elections was able to remotely access voting machines and manipulate votes without even waking up the machine, keeping the screen black at the physical location of the voting machine. This would mean nobody would even know someone was accessing the machine remotely and making changes. This should tell you everything you need to know. Pass the SAVE ACT, get rid of ALL mail-in ballots, electronic voting machines, and 3rd party companies connected to our elections, and have Congress pass a law to make states use paper only.

The SCIF

296,268 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад