Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Dr. Aseem Malhotra recently dropped a bombshell in a powerful discussion with Dr. John Campbell. The key takeaway? The mRNA vaccines (Pfizer/Moderna) were more harmful than COVID itself from the very beginning. A reanalysis of the original Pfizer/Moderna trials revealed: - 2-4x higher risk of serious harm from the...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

460,787 subscribers

68,576 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Gesundheit & WellnessWissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in the journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. The data was there from the beginning. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."
0:48

Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in the journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. The data was there from the beginning. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."

Camus

77,375 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.
1:42

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: Reanalysis Shows COVID Vaccine 2-4x More Likely to Cause Serious Harm Than COVID was to Hospitalize You Renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra highlights a critical independent reanalysis of the original Pfizer and Moderna trials, published in the journal Vaccine in 2022 by a team including BMJ's Peter Doshi. The findings are staggering and call into question the very core of the global vaccine mandate policy. The data shows an individual was 2 to 4 times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event (resulting in disability, a life-changing incident, or hospitalization) from the COVID mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID itself. This isn't a fringe theory; this is the re-examined data from the trials that led to approval. This pivotal research is now influencing high-level policy, cited by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within HHS to argue against further investment in this technology. Dr. Malhotra posits a sobering conclusion: had this data been subjected to truly independent scrutiny from the start—without the commercial influence that biases regulators like the MHRA (which receives 86% of its funding from pharma)—these vaccines may never have been approved for a single human being. The evidence suggests they caused more harm than good. This truth, now known by insiders at HHS and the White House, must be acknowledged publicly. It is a necessary step toward restoring integrity to medicine and public health.

Camus

46,957 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.
5:00

Critical COVID Vaccine Revelations from Dr. Aseem Malhotra on The Diary of a CEO In a revealing Diary of a CEO interview with Steven Bartlett, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra exposed data that should have halted the COVID vaccine rollout. A reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s trials, published in Vaccine, found serious harm—hospitalization, disability, or life-changing events—at a rate of 1 in 800, surpassing the risk of COVID hospitalization during the deadliest strain, across all age groups. Historically, vaccines were withdrawn for less: the swine flu vaccine was suspended for Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1 in 100,000, and the rotavirus vaccine for a 1 in 10,000 risk of bowel obstruction. Yet, the COVID vaccine’s 1 in 800 harm rate—40% tied to clotting disorders like lung clots and heart attacks—was ignored. UK data from 2023 showed that for over-70s, 2,500 vaccinations were needed to prevent one COVID hospitalization during Omicron. For under-50s, the number reaches hundreds of thousands. With Delta, it was about 1 in 250 for over-70s, unadjusted for socioeconomic factors. Sourced from Health Canada and the FDA, this data questions the mandates and coercion behind the rollout. Dr. Malhotra calls this a serious issue, unfit for medical use. Transparency is urgent.

Camus

45,590 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.
1:42

New Analysis: 2-4x Greater Risk of Serious Harm from mRNA Vaccine Than COVID Hospitalization A bombshell re-examination of the original Pfizer and Moderna trial data has reached a conclusion that demands urgent public attention. According to renowned cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, an independent study published in Vaccine (2022) found a staggering inverse risk-benefit profile. The analysis, led by experts including BMJ associate editor Peter Doshi, revealed that during the trials, an individual was two to four times more likely to suffer a serious adverse event—defined as disability, life-changing injury, or hospitalization—from the mRNA vaccine than they were to be hospitalized with COVID-19. This critical research is now central to the argument that the vaccines may have caused more net harm than good. Dr. Malhotra suggests that had this independent analysis been possible before emergency authorization—without the influence of industry-funded regulators—the vaccines may not have been approved for a single person. This data is no longer just a scientific discussion; it is actively shaping policy, informing recent actions by figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and within the U.S. HHS. It points to a catastrophic failure in the risk-benefit analysis that underpinned global mandates. The imperative now is a full, transparent, and independent review of all data. The public health establishment must be held accountable for decisions made on flawed premises.

Camus

22,222 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan
6:17

Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells Joe Rogan that a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original clinical trial data shows that their COVID mRNA vaccines *INCREASE* your risks of serious adverse events, hospitalization, and death: "In my whole career, looking at all of the drugs and knowing about many different prescribed medications, I've never seen something that when you look at the data has such poor effectiveness and unprecedented harms. In the summer of last year, in the journal Vaccine, the highest-impact medical journal for vaccines, they published a reanalysis of Pfizer and Moderna's original double-blinded randomized controlled trial. This is the highest quality of scientific evidence. Joseph Fraiman is an ER doctor and clinical data scientist from Louisiana. Associate editor of the BMJ, Dr. Peter Doshi. Dr. Robert Kaplan from Stanford. Some real eminence of integrity published this reanalysis, and what they found was this. In the trials that led to the approval of regulators worldwide, you were more likely to suffer a severe adverse event from taking the vaccine, hospitalization, disability, or life-changing event than you were to be hospitalized with COVID. This mRNA vaccine should likely have never been approved for a single human in the first place, and that rate of serious adverse events is at least 1 in 800... 1 in 800 is a very, very high figure. We've pulled other vaccines for much less. The 1976 Swine Flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a debilitating neurological condition called Guillan-Barre syndrome in about 1 in 100,000 people. The Rotavirus vaccine was suspended in 1999 because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in kids in 1 of 10,000. This is at least 1 in 800. It's a no-brainer. So the question is, why have we not paused it?" Study: Dr Aseem Malhotra Joe Rogan

KanekoaTheGreat

2,292,917 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’
5:00

Shocking Reanalysis of Pfizer & Moderna Trials Reveals Alarming Harm Rates A bombshell reanalysis of the original Pfizer & Moderna COVID-19 vaccine trials—published in Vaccine, a top-tier journal—has uncovered disturbing data that should have halted their rollout. Key findings: - 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals suffered serious harm (hospitalization, disability, or life-changing injury). - 40% of these harms were clotting-related (heart attacks, lung clots, etc.). - This harm rate exceeds known thresholds for vaccine withdrawal (e.g., swine flu vaccine was pulled for 1 in 100,000 Guillain-Barré cases). Context: - During the most lethal phase of COVID, the vaccines were more likely to hospitalize you than COVID itself (on average, across age groups). - Later UK data (2023) showed 2,500 over-70s needed vaccination to prevent one Omicron hospitalization—a shockingly poor benefit-risk ratio. - For under-50s? Hundreds of thousands of doses per prevented hospitalization. Quote from Dr. Aseem Malhotra: "A 1 in 800 serious harm rate is unprecedented in medicine. Past vaccines were pulled for far less. This demands immediate scrutiny—and accountability." The question isn’t just ‘Did the vaccines work?’—but ‘At what cost?’

Camus

24,028 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‘A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."
0:48

‘A reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials in journal Vaccine reveals an unconscionable truth. You were 2-4x more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. This gene therapy never should have been injected into a single human arm."

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

32,266 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: “No One Should Have Ever Received a Single COVID Shot” Dr. Aseem Malhotra is sounding the alarm on what he calls one of the most consequential medical deceptions of our time. Citing a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s own trial data, published in Vaccine by independent scientists including BMJ associate editor Dr. Peter Doshi, the findings reveal a stunning reality: participants were up to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. Malhotra argues this data shows the mRNA injections were misrepresented from day one — products better described as gene therapy than as vaccines. “If this analysis is even close to accurate,” he warns, “then not a single person should have ever been injected.” A momentous statement — and one that demands the world’s attention.
0:48

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: “No One Should Have Ever Received a Single COVID Shot” Dr. Aseem Malhotra is sounding the alarm on what he calls one of the most consequential medical deceptions of our time. Citing a re-analysis of Pfizer and Moderna’s own trial data, published in Vaccine by independent scientists including BMJ associate editor Dr. Peter Doshi, the findings reveal a stunning reality: participants were up to four times more likely to suffer serious harm from the shot than to be hospitalized with COVID. Malhotra argues this data shows the mRNA injections were misrepresented from day one — products better described as gene therapy than as vaccines. “If this analysis is even close to accurate,” he warns, “then not a single person should have ever been injected.” A momentous statement — and one that demands the world’s attention.

Camus

83,318 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🔥🔥🔥Crowd gave a standing ovation for Dr. Aseem Malhotra Dr Aseem Malhotra for his speech at yesterday’s Reform UK conference. If you have 18 minutes today, this is a must watch! - Called for a moratorium on COVID mRNA vaccines citing a reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials showing a 2-4 times higher risk of serious harm than hospitalization prevention. - The World Health Organization that is being captured. That is being captured by Bill Gates, who is largest funder now Bill Gates, who made half a billion dollars in investments in the COVID vaccines. - Audiences gasped when Dr. Malhotra claimed that COVID vaccines were a significant factor in cancer cases among members of the royal family. - Calls out Pfizer of pushing COVID-19 vaccine mandates for profit, despite knowing by summer 2021 that the vaccines did not stop infection or transmission, while funding organizations to support these mandates and earning $100 billion.
18:12

🔥🔥🔥Crowd gave a standing ovation for Dr. Aseem Malhotra Dr Aseem Malhotra for his speech at yesterday’s Reform UK conference. If you have 18 minutes today, this is a must watch! - Called for a moratorium on COVID mRNA vaccines citing a reanalysis of Pfizer/Moderna trials showing a 2-4 times higher risk of serious harm than hospitalization prevention. - The World Health Organization that is being captured. That is being captured by Bill Gates, who is largest funder now Bill Gates, who made half a billion dollars in investments in the COVID vaccines. - Audiences gasped when Dr. Malhotra claimed that COVID vaccines were a significant factor in cancer cases among members of the royal family. - Calls out Pfizer of pushing COVID-19 vaccine mandates for profit, despite knowing by summer 2021 that the vaccines did not stop infection or transmission, while funding organizations to support these mandates and earning $100 billion.

aussie17

185,694 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."
1:33

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

483,512 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just shared Covid stats so alarming they could make even the staunchest vaccine defender think twice. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” Dr Aseem Malhotra
1:38

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just shared Covid stats so alarming they could make even the staunchest vaccine defender think twice. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” Dr Aseem Malhotra

Children’s Health Defense

131,222 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)
1:23

Dr. Aseem Malhotra just dropped Covid stats that should make anyone who still supports the Covid vaccines stop and think. “The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was two to four times more likely to cause serious harm than it was to prevent hospitalization from Covid.” “The rate of serious harm (from the vaccine) was about 1 in 800 within two months.” “In the UK in 2024, you had to vaccinate 7,000 people over age 90 to prevent one severe hospitalization — while the harm rate (from the vaccine) was at least 1 in 800.” “That protection of one in 7,000 only lasts about six months.” “Steven Hatfill, a chief medical officer at HHS, said their analysis of hundreds of studies showed the mRNA vaccine is harmful — it was a no-brainer to stop using this technology.” “He also warned the vaccine may be interfering with tumor suppressor genes, raising concern it could be linked to cancer.” “Now, we don't know if it's completely causal, but there is certainly a concern that this may be causing cancer.” (Video from Weekly MAHA Action Media Hub)

MAHA Action

196,748 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Dr. John Campbell told Jimmy Dore there’s already been enough data to justify removing the Covid vaccine from circulation. “The risk-benefit analysis from the vaccine was never favorable in my view.” “Basically, about 1 in 800 people were getting serious adverse events.” “This is more than enough to have the vaccine withdrawn — more than enough — and yet people persisted with it.” “You know the saying, when you’re in a hole, stop digging” “But they just kept on digging.” “People, of course, don’t want to admit that they got things wrong.” Jimmy Dore
1:19

Dr. John Campbell told Jimmy Dore there’s already been enough data to justify removing the Covid vaccine from circulation. “The risk-benefit analysis from the vaccine was never favorable in my view.” “Basically, about 1 in 800 people were getting serious adverse events.” “This is more than enough to have the vaccine withdrawn — more than enough — and yet people persisted with it.” “You know the saying, when you’re in a hole, stop digging” “But they just kept on digging.” “People, of course, don’t want to admit that they got things wrong.” Jimmy Dore

Children’s Health Defense

51,824 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The “Mother Lode” of Government Data Exposes the Deadly COVID-19 Shots It turns out that the Moderna shot is “30% MORE deadly than the Pfizer shot.” How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. But the younger you go, the worse it gets. The explosive government data from the Czech Republic shows that 46 to 69-year-olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. “Vaccines are not supposed to increase your all-cause mortality; they're supposed to reduce it.” “So even if the Pfizer shot were perfectly safe, the Moderna shot is a complete disaster. It should never increase all-cause mortality, and it increases all-cause mortality by 30% [compared to Pfizer].” Steve Kirsch
4:55

The “Mother Lode” of Government Data Exposes the Deadly COVID-19 Shots It turns out that the Moderna shot is “30% MORE deadly than the Pfizer shot.” How can this happen with a “safe” vaccine? Simply put, it can't. But the younger you go, the worse it gets. The explosive government data from the Czech Republic shows that 46 to 69-year-olds who received two shots of Moderna faced over a 50% HIGHER risk of death compared to those who got two shots of Pfizer within a one-year period. “Vaccines are not supposed to increase your all-cause mortality; they're supposed to reduce it.” “So even if the Pfizer shot were perfectly safe, the Moderna shot is a complete disaster. It should never increase all-cause mortality, and it increases all-cause mortality by 30% [compared to Pfizer].” Steve Kirsch

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

254,306 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Peter McCullough: HALT All mRNA Vaccines Several studies have recently come out, showing alarming findings from the COVID-19 mRNA injections: • A study from Schreckenberg demonstrated that mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are directly toxic to heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes). • A study from Krausen revealed the presence of vaccine mRNA in the heart tissue of people who died after receiving the vaccine. • In contrast to what authorities told us, a study from Castruita showed that vaccine mRNA circulates in the bloodstream for at least a month and remains in lymph nodes around the injection site for at least a couple of months. Even more frightening, this mRNA technology is coming soon to flu and RSV shots, turning an ineffective but generally safe flu shot into a dangerous shot, says Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "There should be a ban on all messenger development at this point in time, given the COVID-19 vaccine debacle."
1:14

Dr. Peter McCullough: HALT All mRNA Vaccines Several studies have recently come out, showing alarming findings from the COVID-19 mRNA injections: • A study from Schreckenberg demonstrated that mRNA from Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are directly toxic to heart muscle cells (cardiomyocytes). • A study from Krausen revealed the presence of vaccine mRNA in the heart tissue of people who died after receiving the vaccine. • In contrast to what authorities told us, a study from Castruita showed that vaccine mRNA circulates in the bloodstream for at least a month and remains in lymph nodes around the injection site for at least a couple of months. Even more frightening, this mRNA technology is coming soon to flu and RSV shots, turning an ineffective but generally safe flu shot into a dangerous shot, says Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "There should be a ban on all messenger development at this point in time, given the COVID-19 vaccine debacle."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

718,351 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Dr. Aseem Malhotra calls for urgent suspension of mRNA COVID vaccines: A bold stand for public health In an interview with Channel 4, renowned cardiologist and public health advocate Dr. Aseem Malhotra delivered a powerful message about the urgent need to reassess the use of mRNA COVID vaccines. With unwavering conviction, Dr. Malhotra emphasized that the current data on these vaccines reveals a concerning rate of harm, particularly as COVID-19 has evolved into a far less deadly threat. “From a rational perspective, there’s no better time than now to say, enough is enough,” he declared, signaling a critical turning point in the global conversation on vaccine safety. Dr. Malhotra, leveraging his independent role with Maha Action, revealed that he has already engaged in discussions with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent figure in health policy reform. His plan is clear and resolute: to present the mounting evidence to policymakers and advocate for an immediate pause in the administration of mRNA vaccines across the United States. “This is the evidence. We need to pause. We need to consider suspending their use in all states,” he stated, underscoring the gravity of the situation and the need for swift action to protect public health.
0:44

Dr. Aseem Malhotra calls for urgent suspension of mRNA COVID vaccines: A bold stand for public health In an interview with Channel 4, renowned cardiologist and public health advocate Dr. Aseem Malhotra delivered a powerful message about the urgent need to reassess the use of mRNA COVID vaccines. With unwavering conviction, Dr. Malhotra emphasized that the current data on these vaccines reveals a concerning rate of harm, particularly as COVID-19 has evolved into a far less deadly threat. “From a rational perspective, there’s no better time than now to say, enough is enough,” he declared, signaling a critical turning point in the global conversation on vaccine safety. Dr. Malhotra, leveraging his independent role with Maha Action, revealed that he has already engaged in discussions with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent figure in health policy reform. His plan is clear and resolute: to present the mounting evidence to policymakers and advocate for an immediate pause in the administration of mRNA vaccines across the United States. “This is the evidence. We need to pause. We need to consider suspending their use in all states,” he stated, underscoring the gravity of the situation and the need for swift action to protect public health.

Camus

137,547 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

💥RFK - "The immunity which was passed in 1986" comes from Wyath (now Pfizer) telling Reagan they'd leave Big Pharma without liability protection. IS THE ERA OF LIABILITY PROTECTION ENDING? 🧵Here's 36 x evidences that might be revealed in the new Kansas suit against PFIZER 💥 ◽️ 1223 Deaths were reported in Pfizer's initial clinical trial data ◽️According to Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, "At NO POINT during the trial was the intervention LIFE SAVING" ◽️ The same DR revealed undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the Pfizer trial ◽️RFK said that according to Pfizer’s own data, more people died of All Cause Mortality in the vaccine group at the end of a 6 x month period ◽️There was 5 x heart attacks in the vaccine group and only 1 x in the placebo group at the end of that period. An increase of 500% ◽️Guernsey had an increase of 500% in Myocarditis in the year of the roll-out, correlating to Pfizer actual trial data ◽️Pfizer reported to the FDA that Maddie de Garay had a "Stomach ache", when she's in a wheelchair ◽️Pfizer used data for FDA approval that does not match Maddie's adverse events reported in senate testimony for EUA approval and liability protection ◽️ According to Maddie's mother, The FDA approved Pfizer's mRNA covid vaccine for children when Maddie was in hospital from ADEs associated to the mRNA covid product she took in that clinical trial ◽️Pfizer emphasised relative risk as opposed to absolute risk for efficacy and marketing of the effectiveness of their product ◽️For Pfizer in terms of Absolute Risk (not relative risk), there was no Statistically Significant benefit to the prevention of people catching covid for the mRNA vaccinated group ◽️ Pfizer Admitted the NEVER TESTED the vaccine on whether it can prevent TRANSMISSION ◽️ Israeli research found men that were vaccinated had decreased sperm counts ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer had 2 x labels for the same product. The EUA product was available, but the licensed version of the same product was “unavailable” ◽️Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold the clinical trial evidence for 75 years ◽️ Dr Dr Aseem Malhotra mentioned that Re analysis of the Pfizer data shows an adverse event rate of 1/800 ◽️ An Australian FOI revealed the TGA Bioaccumulation studies that show mRNA Lipid Nano Particles are distributed THROUGHOUT the body ◽️ In similar data, the implantation loss of the mice tested more than doubled in the mRNA group ◽️ Myocarditis is a recognised side effect from governments globally ◽️ Several studies have shown (one done in Israel) Myocarditis only occurs in the vaccinated ◽️Albert Bourla said “MRNA had never delivered a single product” and that Pfizer had less experience with” and that Pfizer and BioNTech were working on mRNA for FLU vaccines from 2018 ◽️ Albert Bourla, when asked on 2 x separate occasions whether he’d taken his own vaccine product, said “NO”, he didn't want to "cut the line" ◽️According to Dr Aseem Malhotra, Pfizer paid front groups to push for Vaccine mandates ◽️Pfizer had special mRNA vaccine batches for their employees according to Pfizer's own spokespeople in Australian Senate testimony ◽️South Africa court released documents revealed Pfizer asked governments to set up insurance scheme for adverse outcomes ◽️Pfizer admitted in the South African court documents that the “long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known” ◽️Trial data used for assessing pregnancy safety was analysed by researchers that owned stocks in the company that made the product they were evaluating ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer needed to get it recommended to children for liability protection ◽️Kevin McKernan has found DNA CONTAMINATION IN PFIZER - Multiple studies confirm ◽️@P_J_Buckhaults has found DNA contamination ◽️DNA contamination confirmed in Australian Pfizer & Moderna Vials. DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA ◽️Dr. David Martin mentioned that Pfizer admitted their product is experimental gene therapy in filings ◽️Pfizer did not seek approval through Gene Therapy regulations in Australia (Gillespie) ◽Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. mentioned "Trans-placental exposure" of newborns to Pfizer's product ◽️"The miscarriage rate was 80% in the Pfizer trials" ◽️The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is based on a spike protein that strong evidence suggests was a man made virus, potentially done with GOF research ◽️According to the James Okeefe Veritas Whistleblower story, a Pfizer Director stated Pfizer are talking about “Mutating covid viruses” ◽️Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most published Cardiologists, has analyzed all the data and said that Pfizer “should never have been approved” What else is there to add to this list of EVIDENCE? The discovery process for this new Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer is sure to be EPIC
3:18

💥RFK - "The immunity which was passed in 1986" comes from Wyath (now Pfizer) telling Reagan they'd leave Big Pharma without liability protection. IS THE ERA OF LIABILITY PROTECTION ENDING? 🧵Here's 36 x evidences that might be revealed in the new Kansas suit against PFIZER 💥 ◽️ 1223 Deaths were reported in Pfizer's initial clinical trial data ◽️According to Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, "At NO POINT during the trial was the intervention LIFE SAVING" ◽️ The same DR revealed undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the Pfizer trial ◽️RFK said that according to Pfizer’s own data, more people died of All Cause Mortality in the vaccine group at the end of a 6 x month period ◽️There was 5 x heart attacks in the vaccine group and only 1 x in the placebo group at the end of that period. An increase of 500% ◽️Guernsey had an increase of 500% in Myocarditis in the year of the roll-out, correlating to Pfizer actual trial data ◽️Pfizer reported to the FDA that Maddie de Garay had a "Stomach ache", when she's in a wheelchair ◽️Pfizer used data for FDA approval that does not match Maddie's adverse events reported in senate testimony for EUA approval and liability protection ◽️ According to Maddie's mother, The FDA approved Pfizer's mRNA covid vaccine for children when Maddie was in hospital from ADEs associated to the mRNA covid product she took in that clinical trial ◽️Pfizer emphasised relative risk as opposed to absolute risk for efficacy and marketing of the effectiveness of their product ◽️For Pfizer in terms of Absolute Risk (not relative risk), there was no Statistically Significant benefit to the prevention of people catching covid for the mRNA vaccinated group ◽️ Pfizer Admitted the NEVER TESTED the vaccine on whether it can prevent TRANSMISSION ◽️ Israeli research found men that were vaccinated had decreased sperm counts ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer had 2 x labels for the same product. The EUA product was available, but the licensed version of the same product was “unavailable” ◽️Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold the clinical trial evidence for 75 years ◽️ Dr Dr Aseem Malhotra mentioned that Re analysis of the Pfizer data shows an adverse event rate of 1/800 ◽️ An Australian FOI revealed the TGA Bioaccumulation studies that show mRNA Lipid Nano Particles are distributed THROUGHOUT the body ◽️ In similar data, the implantation loss of the mice tested more than doubled in the mRNA group ◽️ Myocarditis is a recognised side effect from governments globally ◽️ Several studies have shown (one done in Israel) Myocarditis only occurs in the vaccinated ◽️Albert Bourla said “MRNA had never delivered a single product” and that Pfizer had less experience with” and that Pfizer and BioNTech were working on mRNA for FLU vaccines from 2018 ◽️ Albert Bourla, when asked on 2 x separate occasions whether he’d taken his own vaccine product, said “NO”, he didn't want to "cut the line" ◽️According to Dr Aseem Malhotra, Pfizer paid front groups to push for Vaccine mandates ◽️Pfizer had special mRNA vaccine batches for their employees according to Pfizer's own spokespeople in Australian Senate testimony ◽️South Africa court released documents revealed Pfizer asked governments to set up insurance scheme for adverse outcomes ◽️Pfizer admitted in the South African court documents that the “long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known” ◽️Trial data used for assessing pregnancy safety was analysed by researchers that owned stocks in the company that made the product they were evaluating ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer needed to get it recommended to children for liability protection ◽️Kevin McKernan has found DNA CONTAMINATION IN PFIZER - Multiple studies confirm ◽️@P_J_Buckhaults has found DNA contamination ◽️DNA contamination confirmed in Australian Pfizer & Moderna Vials. DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA ◽️Dr. David Martin mentioned that Pfizer admitted their product is experimental gene therapy in filings ◽️Pfizer did not seek approval through Gene Therapy regulations in Australia (Gillespie) ◽Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. mentioned "Trans-placental exposure" of newborns to Pfizer's product ◽️"The miscarriage rate was 80% in the Pfizer trials" ◽️The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is based on a spike protein that strong evidence suggests was a man made virus, potentially done with GOF research ◽️According to the James Okeefe Veritas Whistleblower story, a Pfizer Director stated Pfizer are talking about “Mutating covid viruses” ◽️Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most published Cardiologists, has analyzed all the data and said that Pfizer “should never have been approved” What else is there to add to this list of EVIDENCE? The discovery process for this new Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer is sure to be EPIC

Humanspective

476,233 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren