Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Dr. Mark Hyman explains why you should avoid artificial sweeteners. "For a whole host of reasons they harm your body." "One, they create damage to your microbiome and lead to increase in obesity and diabetes." "Two, they seem to trigger your brain in a way that creates what we... call cephalic insulin response... They'll trigger your brain to think sugar's on the way." "It starts producing secondary metabolic effects like increasing insulin... And that drives you to be hungrier—to eat more." "So that's why when you look at all the studies, people who drink artificial sweeteners are more likely to be overweight, more likely to have diabetes." "It seems to be counterintuitive, but it actually is what the data show."show more

Wide Awake Media

809,948 subscribers

17,881 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Dr. Rhonda Patrick drops a wild irony bomb on Diet Coke: You're ditching sugar to avoid insulin spikes and obesity... but aspartame (Diet Coke's main sweetener) reshapes your gut microbiome to favor bacteria that harvest glucose more efficiently — making you more prone to weight gain. Animal studies show causal links; human associative data backs it up. The very drink people use to "stay lean" can backfire by shifting gut bugs toward obesity-promoting patterns. One can occasionally? Probably fine. One (or more) a day? You're constantly nudging your microbiome in the wrong direction. The ultimate plot twist: Diet Coke might be sabotaging the exact goal it's marketed for. Ditch the aspartame or keep sipping? What's your take on artificial sweeteners?

Dr. Rhonda Patrick drops a wild irony bomb on Diet Coke: You're ditching sugar to avoid insulin spikes and obesity... but aspartame (Diet Coke's main sweetener) reshapes your gut microbiome to favor bacteria that harvest glucose more efficiently — making you more prone to weight gain. Animal studies show causal links; human associative data backs it up. The very drink people use to "stay lean" can backfire by shifting gut bugs toward obesity-promoting patterns. One can occasionally? Probably fine. One (or more) a day? You're constantly nudging your microbiome in the wrong direction. The ultimate plot twist: Diet Coke might be sabotaging the exact goal it's marketed for. Ditch the aspartame or keep sipping? What's your take on artificial sweeteners?

Camus

1,570,497 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Unpopular FACT: Artifical sweetners do NOT make you hungry You’ve probably heard some version of the following: "Artificial sweeteners make you hungry." "Sweet taste without calories confuses your brain." "They make you crave more sweets." You've probably heard some version of these claims before. The problem? The data keep refusing to cooperate. A new study, "Acute and prolonged effects of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on postprandial appetite sensations, palatability, and ad libitum energy intake in humans," examined exactly this question If artificial sweeteners really increased hunger, cravings, or caused people to eat more later, this study should have found it. It didn't. Researchers found that consuming sweeteners and sweetness enhancers did not increase subsequent energy intake, did not meaningfully increase appetite, and did not lead participants to compensate by eating more later. In other words, the common claim that "sweet taste without calories tricks your brain into overeating" continues to lack support from actual human data. This is a great reminder that just because a mechanism sounds plausible doesn't mean it translates into real-world behavior. Humans aren't Petri dishes, and while people love inventing scary stories about artificial sweeteners, the totality of evidence continues to show that replacing sugar with low- or no-calorie sweeteners generally helps reduce calorie intake and can support fat loss. Your body isn't sitting there thinking: "Wait a second... that was sweet but not enough calories. Better order a large pizza." It doesn't work that way. This study showed people actually ate slightly less calories when consuming artificial sweeteners. This is in alignment with other studies demonstrating that artificial sweeteners decrease energy intake and reduce body fat in tightly controlled human RCTs (PMIDs: 40913681 & 39606579) As always, test hypotheses against data, not vibes.

Unpopular FACT: Artifical sweetners do NOT make you hungry You’ve probably heard some version of the following: "Artificial sweeteners make you hungry." "Sweet taste without calories confuses your brain." "They make you crave more sweets." You've probably heard some version of these claims before. The problem? The data keep refusing to cooperate. A new study, "Acute and prolonged effects of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers on postprandial appetite sensations, palatability, and ad libitum energy intake in humans," examined exactly this question If artificial sweeteners really increased hunger, cravings, or caused people to eat more later, this study should have found it. It didn't. Researchers found that consuming sweeteners and sweetness enhancers did not increase subsequent energy intake, did not meaningfully increase appetite, and did not lead participants to compensate by eating more later. In other words, the common claim that "sweet taste without calories tricks your brain into overeating" continues to lack support from actual human data. This is a great reminder that just because a mechanism sounds plausible doesn't mean it translates into real-world behavior. Humans aren't Petri dishes, and while people love inventing scary stories about artificial sweeteners, the totality of evidence continues to show that replacing sugar with low- or no-calorie sweeteners generally helps reduce calorie intake and can support fat loss. Your body isn't sitting there thinking: "Wait a second... that was sweet but not enough calories. Better order a large pizza." It doesn't work that way. This study showed people actually ate slightly less calories when consuming artificial sweeteners. This is in alignment with other studies demonstrating that artificial sweeteners decrease energy intake and reduce body fat in tightly controlled human RCTs (PMIDs: 40913681 & 39606579) As always, test hypotheses against data, not vibes.

Layne Norton, PhD

12,458 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This man is not a big fan of liberals but says he’d have somewhat respect if they told black people this ONE truth: What is the number 1 threat to black people in their communities? They know but refuse to answer. — Who’s more likely to rob you in your community? — Who’s more likely to sh00t you over a dispute in your community? — Who’s more likely to stàb you in your community? — Who’s more likely to hate on you if you have a difference of opinion? — Who’s more likely to vote for people who do not have your best interest at heart? The answer is…the biggest threat to the black community is other black people. This is a truth liberals will never admit to because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

This man is not a big fan of liberals but says he’d have somewhat respect if they told black people this ONE truth: What is the number 1 threat to black people in their communities? They know but refuse to answer. — Who’s more likely to rob you in your community? — Who’s more likely to sh00t you over a dispute in your community? — Who’s more likely to stàb you in your community? — Who’s more likely to hate on you if you have a difference of opinion? — Who’s more likely to vote for people who do not have your best interest at heart? The answer is…the biggest threat to the black community is other black people. This is a truth liberals will never admit to because it doesn’t fit their narrative.

Sequencer

17,141 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“It all starts from your heart, your mind, and the way you think. When I say don’t be cowards, be lions, what I mean precisely is that, to be a coward is to live without an opinion, allowing people to insult you and you apologize to them instead of them apologizing to you. They should be the ones to apologize. To be a lion is to accept to deal with and confront your challenges, those of your family or country, and you own them unapologetically.” Chairman Kagame | Interaction with Content Creators.

“It all starts from your heart, your mind, and the way you think. When I say don’t be cowards, be lions, what I mean precisely is that, to be a coward is to live without an opinion, allowing people to insult you and you apologize to them instead of them apologizing to you. They should be the ones to apologize. To be a lion is to accept to deal with and confront your challenges, those of your family or country, and you own them unapologetically.” Chairman Kagame | Interaction with Content Creators.

FPR-Inkotanyi

44,136 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Ray Peat on diabetes, cortisol, sugar, and protein: "I saw that several of the amino acids in proteins are powerful insulin stimulants. When you eat protein by itself, you stimulate insulin secretion, which is needed to metabolize the amino acids. In reaction to the insulin, your liver has to put out glucose to keep your blood sugar going, so your brain, blood cells, kidneys, and so on can keep working. If your liver is somewhat low on glycogen, then every time you eat protein and have an insulin secretion, your body secretes a compensating amount of cortisol to bring your blood sugar back up. However, the cortisol brings your blood sugar up at the expense of protein. Cortisol first breaks down tissues like the thymus gland, immune cells, and muscles. If you eat lots of protein, despite the high cortisol, you can maintain a balance by replacing your muscles and thymus gland, but you are running on constantly high cortisol secretion. In my previous interest in diabetes, I saw that doctors often neglected to measure hormones related to blood sugar when prescribing insulin. Doctors would call a person diabetic and say they needed to take insulin for life. But by testing cortisol in some of these individuals, we saw that many so-called diabetics just had very high cortisol. Sugar happens to be the best thing for lowering cortisol to normal. Since high cortisol can give the impression of diabetes by causing high blood sugar, you get the unexpected effect of lowering cortisol when you eat sugar. Some of these people had a very quick recovery from their so-called diabetes."

Ray Peat on diabetes, cortisol, sugar, and protein: "I saw that several of the amino acids in proteins are powerful insulin stimulants. When you eat protein by itself, you stimulate insulin secretion, which is needed to metabolize the amino acids. In reaction to the insulin, your liver has to put out glucose to keep your blood sugar going, so your brain, blood cells, kidneys, and so on can keep working. If your liver is somewhat low on glycogen, then every time you eat protein and have an insulin secretion, your body secretes a compensating amount of cortisol to bring your blood sugar back up. However, the cortisol brings your blood sugar up at the expense of protein. Cortisol first breaks down tissues like the thymus gland, immune cells, and muscles. If you eat lots of protein, despite the high cortisol, you can maintain a balance by replacing your muscles and thymus gland, but you are running on constantly high cortisol secretion. In my previous interest in diabetes, I saw that doctors often neglected to measure hormones related to blood sugar when prescribing insulin. Doctors would call a person diabetic and say they needed to take insulin for life. But by testing cortisol in some of these individuals, we saw that many so-called diabetics just had very high cortisol. Sugar happens to be the best thing for lowering cortisol to normal. Since high cortisol can give the impression of diabetes by causing high blood sugar, you get the unexpected effect of lowering cortisol when you eat sugar. Some of these people had a very quick recovery from their so-called diabetes."

Master Metabolism

50,214 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

King68 REVEALS how your favorite HEALTHY FRUIT might actually be KEEPING you FAT 😳👀 "Fruits are good for you, but for somebody that's really trying to lose weight, they need to be doing things that don't spike their sugar. That's the key." "Why people gain fat and gain a lot of weight is because you're spiking your insulin levels and your sugar goes up and your body goes into fat storage mode." "So when you eat, when you eat fruits, especially in the morning, you're spiking the shit out of your glucose."

King68 REVEALS how your favorite HEALTHY FRUIT might actually be KEEPING you FAT 😳👀 "Fruits are good for you, but for somebody that's really trying to lose weight, they need to be doing things that don't spike their sugar. That's the key." "Why people gain fat and gain a lot of weight is because you're spiking your insulin levels and your sugar goes up and your body goes into fat storage mode." "So when you eat, when you eat fruits, especially in the morning, you're spiking the shit out of your glucose."

S6BER

50,965 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Being Dominant means being the One in Control. Some people love it and some hate it, but either way, there is always someone in control and the areas where you are not the one in control, are where you have given that control to someone else! Being the one in control means being the one people TRUST to lead, to be in charge. And for us to hold that responsibility, we gotta be not only comfortable with that role, but to love it! To want it. Control holds negative connotations, yet if it is exerted by someone with positive intentions, it is very healthy. It means you trust yourself and don't need to rely on others to direct you. NOT being in control means chaos. It means helplessness. It means inability to make decisions. Or to take initiatives. It means you are the one that follows. And if that is what you actually desire you have to be conscious of that choice. Otherwise you fall into that role and then wonder why nothing goes as you want. And if you choose to follow, choose your leader wisely. There always is someone in control, someone in charge, someone that leads. There is always a power dynamic. Truth is, we feel safe with those in control. Especially when they show us that them being in that role is positive for us. But so many people trust others more than they trust themselves! Which means being constantly influenced by everyone else's option and advice... which makes then the ones in control of your life! Decide WHO you want to take control when you want or need it, but also choose when YOU should be The One in charge. Developing that self-trust requires radical self responsibility. Which is what people struggle with. Nobody wants to be responsible for anything. And then we blame everyone for why our lives are not what we want them to be. And if you DO want to dominate, start by controling your own Self, your own thoughts, your own life. You can't expect others to trust YOU if YOU don't. Think about it... those that are in control are the people that have the most influence in the world. So if conscious people who desire to create a positive change take more control/responsibility, it would literally change society as we know it.

Being Dominant means being the One in Control. Some people love it and some hate it, but either way, there is always someone in control and the areas where you are not the one in control, are where you have given that control to someone else! Being the one in control means being the one people TRUST to lead, to be in charge. And for us to hold that responsibility, we gotta be not only comfortable with that role, but to love it! To want it. Control holds negative connotations, yet if it is exerted by someone with positive intentions, it is very healthy. It means you trust yourself and don't need to rely on others to direct you. NOT being in control means chaos. It means helplessness. It means inability to make decisions. Or to take initiatives. It means you are the one that follows. And if that is what you actually desire you have to be conscious of that choice. Otherwise you fall into that role and then wonder why nothing goes as you want. And if you choose to follow, choose your leader wisely. There always is someone in control, someone in charge, someone that leads. There is always a power dynamic. Truth is, we feel safe with those in control. Especially when they show us that them being in that role is positive for us. But so many people trust others more than they trust themselves! Which means being constantly influenced by everyone else's option and advice... which makes then the ones in control of your life! Decide WHO you want to take control when you want or need it, but also choose when YOU should be The One in charge. Developing that self-trust requires radical self responsibility. Which is what people struggle with. Nobody wants to be responsible for anything. And then we blame everyone for why our lives are not what we want them to be. And if you DO want to dominate, start by controling your own Self, your own thoughts, your own life. You can't expect others to trust YOU if YOU don't. Think about it... those that are in control are the people that have the most influence in the world. So if conscious people who desire to create a positive change take more control/responsibility, it would literally change society as we know it.

Ms. Malissia

18,397 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

.Aaron Levie shared with CNBC why the rapid rise of AI agents is good news for enterprises that have the right foundation in place. "If you want to be able to include them in your workflow, have them augment your work, they need access to your critical enterprise data. And they need to access it in a secure way, in a way that's governed."

.Aaron Levie shared with CNBC why the rapid rise of AI agents is good news for enterprises that have the right foundation in place. "If you want to be able to include them in your workflow, have them augment your work, they need access to your critical enterprise data. And they need to access it in a secure way, in a way that's governed."

Box

1,904,830 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ELON: AI CAN SIMULATE CONSCIOUSNESS - BUT IS IT REAL? “It feels like consciousness is in a different dimension. This could be just an illusion. If you damage your brain in some way, you damage your consciousness, which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon. What I think is really quite likely is that digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way - and it will suddenly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree, you would not be able to tell the difference.” Source: Elon Musk, Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

ELON: AI CAN SIMULATE CONSCIOUSNESS - BUT IS IT REAL? “It feels like consciousness is in a different dimension. This could be just an illusion. If you damage your brain in some way, you damage your consciousness, which implies that consciousness is a physical phenomenon. What I think is really quite likely is that digital intelligence will be able to outthink us in every way - and it will suddenly be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree, you would not be able to tell the difference.” Source: Elon Musk, Lex Fridman Podcast, November 12, 2019

Mario Nawfal

96,434 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

You ever wonder why you Constantly Overeat? This is why… 🚨 Tobacco/Food Companies Hired Chemists to create chemicals that not only Made food more addictive, but also reduce feelings of Fullness Bastards! That’s why I always overeat at Thanksgiving… • Prior to the 80’s, Tobacco companies were the cash richest companies in the world. But they saw the writing on the wall with all the lawsuits… So what did they do? • The tobacco companies diversified and went out and bought all the food companies —— by 1994, the two biggest food companies were RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris, which were tobacco companies • RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris out to work 10,000+ scientists on how to make food mor addictive. 🔴 FOR EXAMPLE: • They found out that your brain tells you your stomach is filled in-part due to your brain counting the number of times you chew your food. So what did they do? They began adding softeners to our food, so that you wouldn’t chew so much — and in turn, eat a lot more because you never feel full. You’re insatiable. 🔴 ANOTHER EXAMPLE • They figured out that Sugar was just as addictive as crack So what did they do? • They kept adding sugars to keep you addicted to their products. — it kills you slower. — it feeds cancers and tumors — it destroys your body and brain

You ever wonder why you Constantly Overeat? This is why… 🚨 Tobacco/Food Companies Hired Chemists to create chemicals that not only Made food more addictive, but also reduce feelings of Fullness Bastards! That’s why I always overeat at Thanksgiving… • Prior to the 80’s, Tobacco companies were the cash richest companies in the world. But they saw the writing on the wall with all the lawsuits… So what did they do? • The tobacco companies diversified and went out and bought all the food companies —— by 1994, the two biggest food companies were RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris, which were tobacco companies • RJ Reynolds and Phillip Morris out to work 10,000+ scientists on how to make food mor addictive. 🔴 FOR EXAMPLE: • They found out that your brain tells you your stomach is filled in-part due to your brain counting the number of times you chew your food. So what did they do? They began adding softeners to our food, so that you wouldn’t chew so much — and in turn, eat a lot more because you never feel full. You’re insatiable. 🔴 ANOTHER EXAMPLE • They figured out that Sugar was just as addictive as crack So what did they do? • They kept adding sugars to keep you addicted to their products. — it kills you slower. — it feeds cancers and tumors — it destroys your body and brain

MJTruthUltra

97,225 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is why the BC Ostrich Farm matters. It shows clearly that the government has abandoned reason, logic, and fairness. It shows that what they say goes, no matter what they have to take from you to do it or how many years you spent creating the thing they will eagerly destroy. They don't care about proving themselves. They care about doing it and shutting you up. They'll go so far as to throw you in jail to shut you up and they'll create laws to criminalize all speech they don't like. They'll even create laws to kick you off the internet without any due process and make you sign an NDA so you can't tell anyone what happened. They fear your voice. They'll take over your property and build a ridiculous wall of hay to block the world from seeing and rightly questioning the cruelty of what they're doing. They'll make no fly zones so you can't fly a drone and see. They'll harass veterans who dare to even point out to them that they're breaking the law and then they'll bark back that they are the law and what they say goes. It doesn't matter if it's different than what they said ten minutes ago. If they say it, it's true. So shut up and be quiet. They'll fund radical groups to target people they don't like and they'll use circular reporting from the groups they fund to weakly prop up their atrocious disregard for our rights and freedoms. And they'll look you in the face the whole time and tell you that it's for your own good. It's for all of our good. It's for our good that your life's work is destroyed. It's for our good that your speech is silenced. It's for our good that you're thrown in jail to silence you while repeat criminals walk in and out of the court house without even spending a week in jail. It's certainly for their good. Not for our country's. Not for yours. That's why the ostrich farm matters. It shows all of this so clearly in a way that any amount of words never could. And the world needs to see it.

This is why the BC Ostrich Farm matters. It shows clearly that the government has abandoned reason, logic, and fairness. It shows that what they say goes, no matter what they have to take from you to do it or how many years you spent creating the thing they will eagerly destroy. They don't care about proving themselves. They care about doing it and shutting you up. They'll go so far as to throw you in jail to shut you up and they'll create laws to criminalize all speech they don't like. They'll even create laws to kick you off the internet without any due process and make you sign an NDA so you can't tell anyone what happened. They fear your voice. They'll take over your property and build a ridiculous wall of hay to block the world from seeing and rightly questioning the cruelty of what they're doing. They'll make no fly zones so you can't fly a drone and see. They'll harass veterans who dare to even point out to them that they're breaking the law and then they'll bark back that they are the law and what they say goes. It doesn't matter if it's different than what they said ten minutes ago. If they say it, it's true. So shut up and be quiet. They'll fund radical groups to target people they don't like and they'll use circular reporting from the groups they fund to weakly prop up their atrocious disregard for our rights and freedoms. And they'll look you in the face the whole time and tell you that it's for your own good. It's for all of our good. It's for our good that your life's work is destroyed. It's for our good that your speech is silenced. It's for our good that you're thrown in jail to silence you while repeat criminals walk in and out of the court house without even spending a week in jail. It's certainly for their good. Not for our country's. Not for yours. That's why the ostrich farm matters. It shows all of this so clearly in a way that any amount of words never could. And the world needs to see it.

Jon Villeneuve

42,859 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Jeff Bezos just explained why changing your mind is a sign of intelligence, not weakness: "You have to be able to be decisive and make decisions quickly. And that's a very hard thing to do as organizations get larger, because so many people have opinions." "The thing to realize is most decisions are reversible. Very rarely are they high-consequence irreversible decisions. By the way, when they are, you should go slowly. Of course. But most decisions can be made by a single high-judgment individual. And if they go the wrong direction, you stop, you back up. It's a two-way door. You come in, you look at it again, and you change your mind." "In politics, people call you a flip-flopper if you change your mind. How foolish would it be to get new data, to have new analysis, to see something in a fresh way, to have that beginner's mind, have a better idea, and not change your mind." "I've noticed that people who are right a lot change their mind a lot." — Jeff Bezos (Jeff Bezos) P.S. We build content infrastructure for founders and athletes. 1.5M views/week average. Your voice, cross platform, compounding daily. If you need massive distribution or want to build your brand, apply here:

Lewis 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

77,540 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Aspartame spikes insulin? 🚨 New meta-analysis says nope. This new paper (Boxall et al., 2025, Adv Nutr) looked at 100 human experiments on aspartame’s effects on glucose, insulin, and appetite hormones. Here’s the breakdown: What they found: •Aspartame doesn’t meaningfully spike glucose or insulin compared to water/placebo or other sweeteners. •Compared to sugar → aspartame actually reduced glucose & insulin responses in acute settings. •Appetite hormones? Very little effect overall; not enough evidence to claim it alters hunger or intake in a consistent way. •Across medium & long-term studies: same pattern. Few effects, mostly neutral, but lots of study variability → low certainty overall. What it means: If you’re replacing sugar with aspartame, it’s much less likely to mess with your glucose or insulin. It’s not a magic health food, but the scary insulin-spike claims? Not supported by data. TL;DR: Aspartame ≠ insulin villain. When it replaces sugar, it looks neutral — not harmful the way some make it out to be.

Aspartame spikes insulin? 🚨 New meta-analysis says nope. This new paper (Boxall et al., 2025, Adv Nutr) looked at 100 human experiments on aspartame’s effects on glucose, insulin, and appetite hormones. Here’s the breakdown: What they found: •Aspartame doesn’t meaningfully spike glucose or insulin compared to water/placebo or other sweeteners. •Compared to sugar → aspartame actually reduced glucose & insulin responses in acute settings. •Appetite hormones? Very little effect overall; not enough evidence to claim it alters hunger or intake in a consistent way. •Across medium & long-term studies: same pattern. Few effects, mostly neutral, but lots of study variability → low certainty overall. What it means: If you’re replacing sugar with aspartame, it’s much less likely to mess with your glucose or insulin. It’s not a magic health food, but the scary insulin-spike claims? Not supported by data. TL;DR: Aspartame ≠ insulin villain. When it replaces sugar, it looks neutral — not harmful the way some make it out to be.

Layne Norton, PhD

14,882 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

$I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.$

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

15,715 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“They are always checking you and putting you in what they call “your right place”. Your right place should be there, in a place that is broken, dependent. Sometimes they show mercy, they have pity on you and lift you up just a little, so that you don’t die, but you don’t heal either. You are always hospitalized, you come out limping, they let you stagger around for a while, and when you begin to lift your head up, they take you back to the hospital. That is exactly how Africa is. Why would you accept it. Why don’t you put in place your own way of working, and achieve what you want? What is stopping us? ” President Kagame | #Umushyikirano2026

“They are always checking you and putting you in what they call “your right place”. Your right place should be there, in a place that is broken, dependent. Sometimes they show mercy, they have pity on you and lift you up just a little, so that you don’t die, but you don’t heal either. You are always hospitalized, you come out limping, they let you stagger around for a while, and when you begin to lift your head up, they take you back to the hospital. That is exactly how Africa is. Why would you accept it. Why don’t you put in place your own way of working, and achieve what you want? What is stopping us? ” President Kagame | #Umushyikirano2026

Presidency | Rwanda

26,515 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

How purpose and fulfillment physically change your brain's mitochondria: "People who felt more purpose in life and who felt more connected to others, it seemed like that was sufficient to increase the energy transformation capacity of the mitochondria in their brain." "If you tweak the mitochondria in a rat brain, you can change the behavior of that animal from more submissive to more dominant or from more dominant to more submissive." "Chronically stressful things actually damage the mitochondria in the brain, there are fewer mitochondria and they don't transform energy as well." "The human experience is the most direct way in which you can know whether the content of your life matches your energy and matches what matters for you." "Energy flow is the lynch pin between matter, the stuff of biology, and experiences." Martin Picard on Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

How purpose and fulfillment physically change your brain's mitochondria: "People who felt more purpose in life and who felt more connected to others, it seemed like that was sufficient to increase the energy transformation capacity of the mitochondria in their brain." "If you tweak the mitochondria in a rat brain, you can change the behavior of that animal from more submissive to more dominant or from more dominant to more submissive." "Chronically stressful things actually damage the mitochondria in the brain, there are fewer mitochondria and they don't transform energy as well." "The human experience is the most direct way in which you can know whether the content of your life matches your energy and matches what matters for you." "Energy flow is the lynch pin between matter, the stuff of biology, and experiences." Martin Picard on Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

Huberman Lab Clips

23,936 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

American foods are now being engineered using robots to be as addictive as possible “PepsiCo is literally using a robot that mimics human taste buds to make sure that you crave their product before you've even had the first bite. When machines determine what we crave, it's not food anymore, it's manipulation.” “Cheetos are engineered to melt away in your mouth so your brain doesn't think you're eating anything and you can't register the calories. They call this vanishing caloric density. Doritos and other snacks are laced with MSG. MSG that's given to rats in obesity studies to make them fat. How they to create flavors that don't exist in nature in a chemical laboratory so that it creates the one millionth best part of a taste. Our brains have not evolved to handle that and that's one of the reasons why 38% of preteens are now pre-diabetic and that's unacceptable. The fact that the food companies continue to use these tactics that they learned from the tobacco industry and how to hijack our taste buds, hijack our brains so that we cannot stop eating. We can't stand a chance against that type of manipulation and that's why Big Food needs to be held accountable and they need to stop that right now.”

American foods are now being engineered using robots to be as addictive as possible “PepsiCo is literally using a robot that mimics human taste buds to make sure that you crave their product before you've even had the first bite. When machines determine what we crave, it's not food anymore, it's manipulation.” “Cheetos are engineered to melt away in your mouth so your brain doesn't think you're eating anything and you can't register the calories. They call this vanishing caloric density. Doritos and other snacks are laced with MSG. MSG that's given to rats in obesity studies to make them fat. How they to create flavors that don't exist in nature in a chemical laboratory so that it creates the one millionth best part of a taste. Our brains have not evolved to handle that and that's one of the reasons why 38% of preteens are now pre-diabetic and that's unacceptable. The fact that the food companies continue to use these tactics that they learned from the tobacco industry and how to hijack our taste buds, hijack our brains so that we cannot stop eating. We can't stand a chance against that type of manipulation and that's why Big Food needs to be held accountable and they need to stop that right now.”

Wall Street Apes

109,695 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Beshear on what Democrats should do: They should be looking squarely at voters and saying: “We are opposing this because we care about you. We know that your next doctor’s appointment—for your parents and your kids—is critical to you. And you know what? The person you elected— The president you elected— Doesn’t care about you. They’re willing to let you be fired. They’re willing for you to lose your health care coverage. They’re willing to make your drive just to see your doctor take hours longer. Why? Because they don’t care about your everyday life. They said they would. But what you’ve seen is lies— And betrayal. So now is the time for the Democratic Party to make sure that every single day, We’re talking about your job, Your next doctor’s appointment, The roads and bridges you drive on, The school you drop your kids off at, And whether you feel safe in your community. We are going to be the party of your everyday life And we’re going to work everyday to make it better

Beshear on what Democrats should do: They should be looking squarely at voters and saying: “We are opposing this because we care about you. We know that your next doctor’s appointment—for your parents and your kids—is critical to you. And you know what? The person you elected— The president you elected— Doesn’t care about you. They’re willing to let you be fired. They’re willing for you to lose your health care coverage. They’re willing to make your drive just to see your doctor take hours longer. Why? Because they don’t care about your everyday life. They said they would. But what you’ve seen is lies— And betrayal. So now is the time for the Democratic Party to make sure that every single day, We’re talking about your job, Your next doctor’s appointment, The roads and bridges you drive on, The school you drop your kids off at, And whether you feel safe in your community. We are going to be the party of your everyday life And we’re going to work everyday to make it better

Acyn

116,885 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr