Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Dr. Thomas Seyfried drops a bombshell: "Cancer is very preventable... we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet & lifestyle." He flips the script: Cancer isn't primarily genetic—it's a metabolic disease rooted in damaged mitochondria forcing cells to ferment glucose and glutamine for energy. Key...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

462,412 subscribers

66,135 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessEducationScience & Technology
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Dr. Thomas Seyfried: "Cancer is very preventable. It's just that we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet and lifestyle." "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower the blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows." "They're dependent on glucose and glutamine. We can replace glucose and glutamine with ketone bodies." "They slowly start to die, and the body comes in and dissolves them."
0:59

Dr. Thomas Seyfried: "Cancer is very preventable. It's just that we're doing everything we possibly can to induce it in our diet and lifestyle." "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower the blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows." "They're dependent on glucose and glutamine. We can replace glucose and glutamine with ketone bodies." "They slowly start to die, and the body comes in and dissolves them."

Red Pill Dispenser

45,515 views • 7 months ago

Cancer Is Largely Preventable—Here’s the Science-Backed Solution For decades, we’ve been told cancer is a genetic disease—inescapable, unpredictable, a roll of the dice. But what if that’s wrong? Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher, reveals a paradigm-shifting truth: Cancer is a metabolic disease, fueled by the very foods and lifestyles we’ve been conditioned to accept. 🔬 The Science Doesn’t Lie: - High blood sugar = Faster tumor growth. - Low blood sugar = Slower tumor growth. - Cancer cells thrive on glucose & glutamine—but they can’t efficiently use ketones. The Solution? Starve the Tumor. Cancer cells have broken mitochondria, forcing them to rely on fermentation (sugar & glutamine) for survival. But healthy cells can thrive on ketones. This is the key. ✅ How to Shift the Battlefield: 1. Water-only fasting – Deprives tumors of fuel. 2. Ketogenic diet – Replaces glucose with ketones, starving cancer while nourishing the body. 3. Exercise & mitochondrial health – Vigorous movement repairs cellular energy systems. 4. Ditch processed carbs – They feed dysfunction at the deepest level. The result? Tumors lose their energy supply, blood vessels shrink, and the body naturally dismantles them. 🔥 This isn’t theory—it’s biochemistry. The war on cancer isn’t about toxic drugs or blind luck. It’s about controlling the metabolic environment. Want to slash your risk? ✔ Fast strategically. ✔ Go low-carb, high-fat. ✔ Move like your life depends on it. Cancer isn’t just “bad genes.” It’s bad metabolism. And that means you have power over it. — Dr. Thomas Seyfried
1:19

Cancer Is Largely Preventable—Here’s the Science-Backed Solution For decades, we’ve been told cancer is a genetic disease—inescapable, unpredictable, a roll of the dice. But what if that’s wrong? Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher, reveals a paradigm-shifting truth: Cancer is a metabolic disease, fueled by the very foods and lifestyles we’ve been conditioned to accept. 🔬 The Science Doesn’t Lie: - High blood sugar = Faster tumor growth. - Low blood sugar = Slower tumor growth. - Cancer cells thrive on glucose & glutamine—but they can’t efficiently use ketones. The Solution? Starve the Tumor. Cancer cells have broken mitochondria, forcing them to rely on fermentation (sugar & glutamine) for survival. But healthy cells can thrive on ketones. This is the key. ✅ How to Shift the Battlefield: 1. Water-only fasting – Deprives tumors of fuel. 2. Ketogenic diet – Replaces glucose with ketones, starving cancer while nourishing the body. 3. Exercise & mitochondrial health – Vigorous movement repairs cellular energy systems. 4. Ditch processed carbs – They feed dysfunction at the deepest level. The result? Tumors lose their energy supply, blood vessels shrink, and the body naturally dismantles them. 🔥 This isn’t theory—it’s biochemistry. The war on cancer isn’t about toxic drugs or blind luck. It’s about controlling the metabolic environment. Want to slash your risk? ✔ Fast strategically. ✔ Go low-carb, high-fat. ✔ Move like your life depends on it. Cancer isn’t just “bad genes.” It’s bad metabolism. And that means you have power over it. — Dr. Thomas Seyfried

Camus

290,791 views • 1 year ago

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇
0:59

Cancer’s fuel is glucose + glutamine. Starve both → tumors choke and die. Thomas Seyfried: “We have not found a single tumor that can survive without glucose and glutamine. Put the body into nutritional ketosis (low sugar, high ketones/fatty acids) and the cancer cells get hammered. Metabolic therapy should be first-line for every patient.” At the end, maybe a small touch of radiation/chemo/immunotherapy to mop up stragglers—but the foundation is metabolic. Tumor cells are metabolically inflexible. Normal cells thrive on ketones; cancer cells cannot. Transition the body’s fuel source → cancer suffocates. If metabolic therapy (ketogenic diet + glutamine targeting) is this powerful, why isn’t it standard protocol? What’s your take—would you push for metabolic therapy first if diagnosed? Or have you seen / tried keto in cancer contexts? Your thoughts 👇

Camus

325,004 views • 5 months ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried says "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower your blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows. Undeniable." He says the way to manage cancer without toxicity is to simultaneously restrict the two fuels cancer needs to grow: Glucose and Glutamine. The good news is there's a fuel that we can use very efficiently and cancer cannot: ketones. How do you make ketones? Consume little or no carbs and fast. Glutamine can be managed with drugs. To be fair, mainstream oncology disputes Seyfried's metabolic approach, instead relying on expensive chemotherapy that can run $100,000+ per year instead of glutamine restriction, a low carb diet and fasting.
1:00

Dr. Thomas Seyfried says "The higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. The lower your blood sugar, the slower the tumor grows. Undeniable." He says the way to manage cancer without toxicity is to simultaneously restrict the two fuels cancer needs to grow: Glucose and Glutamine. The good news is there's a fuel that we can use very efficiently and cancer cannot: ketones. How do you make ketones? Consume little or no carbs and fast. Glutamine can be managed with drugs. To be fair, mainstream oncology disputes Seyfried's metabolic approach, instead relying on expensive chemotherapy that can run $100,000+ per year instead of glutamine restriction, a low carb diet and fasting.

Cary Kelly

27,219 views • 5 months ago

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.
4:33

The Unspoken Protocol: A Metabolic Revolution in Cancer Care What if our fundamental understanding of cancer is wrong? What if it's not hundreds of disparate diseases, but one single disease of energy metabolism? Pioneering researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried presents a paradigm-shifting view that is both elegant and devastatingly simple. His decades of research, backed by a "granite base" of scientific evidence, point to two primary fuels that drive all cancers: 1. Glucose: The sugar in your blood. The higher the blood sugar, the faster and more aggressively tumors grow—a finding consistent across brain, breast, pancreatic, and lung cancers. 2. Glutamine: An abundant amino acid in the bloodstream. According to Seyfried, cancer cells are "sugar and glutamine junkies." They voraciously consume these two fuels to fuel their dysregulated growth. But here’s the revolutionary therapeutic strategy: Starve the cancer, feed the body. By strategically lowering blood glucose through dietary approaches (e.g., therapeutic ketosis), the body is forced to transition to an alternative fuel: ketone bodies. Normal, healthy cells thrive on ketones. Cancer cells, with their damaged mitochondria, cannot use them effectively. The result? A metabolic standoff where the body enters an "energized state," healthy cells become more robust, and the tumor is systematically weakened. The final piece of the puzzle is targeting the second fuel, glutamine, with precision drugs, creating a powerful, synergistic attack. The most stunning part? This metabolic approach doesn't just target the tumor. Patients see concurrent improvements in type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, and other metabolic disorders. It's a holistic reset. Yet, as Seyfried starkly notes, despite the "rock solid" science, this protocol is not available in any clinical trial worldwide. We have a potent, logical, and data-driven pathway to manage this disease, and it remains on the sidelines. The question is no longer if the metabolism-based model is valid, but when the medical establishment will have the courage to embrace it.

Camus

59,563 views • 9 months ago

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.
0:59

The scientist who proved tumors grow faster when your blood sugar is high just dropped a truth bomb that could change everything we’ve been told about cancer. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, Professor of Biology at Boston College and one of the world’s top cancer-metabolism researchers, used to believe cancer was a genetic disease… until his own lab showed something completely different. Key moments from this 59-second clip that are blowing minds right now: - “We published one of the first papers ever: the higher your blood sugar, the faster the tumor grows. Undeniable.” - Cancer cells have broken mitochondria — they literally cannot survive on the same fuels your healthy cells thrive on. - When you lower glucose + glutamine through keto + strategic fasting, normal cells switch to ketones and feel great… but tumor cells starve. - “We can selectively marginalize these cells slowly over time. They die, blood vessels disappear, and the body dissolves them.” This is not fringe. This is published, peer-reviewed science from a scientist who has spent decades in the lab proving the metabolic theory of cancer. Watch the full 59 seconds — it’s worth every second of your time. What shocked you the most? Drop your reaction below — I read every single one.

Camus

275,027 views • 8 months ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.
6:14

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a leading cancer researcher and speaker, with Christos Shernopoulos from Semmelweis University, has redefined cancer as a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not genetic. His talks reveal that cancer cells ferment glucose and glutamine to survive. Seyfried builds on Otto Warburg’s findings, showing cancer stems from damaged oxidative phosphorylation, triggering fermentation. Environmental factors like hypoxia, carcinogens, viruses, and inflammation disrupt mitochondria, a common mechanism across all cancers. Seyfried’s discussions challenge the genetic theory, exposing its flaws: some tumors lack mutations, driver genes exist in normal tissues without causing cancer, and nuclear transfer experiments show tumor behavior depends on cytoplasm, not the nucleus. He attributes the genetic dogma to confirmation bias. Seyfried notes a tragic consequence: 1,700 daily U.S. cancer deaths stem from treatments based on a flawed genetic model. He advocates metabolic therapy, starving tumors by lowering glucose and glutamine while elevating ketone bodies, which cancer cells cannot use. Seyfried explains the Press-Pulse Therapeutic Strategy, developed with Dominic D’Agostino, George Yu, and Joseph Maroon. His talks detail how this approach presses glucose down through ketosis and pulses glutamine with drugs, offering a non-toxic way to manage cancer, pioneered at Boston College. Seyfried warns that medical schools do not teach cancer as a metabolic disease, leaving oncologists untrained in this approach. He calls for a revenue model to replace toxic treatments with metabolic therapies, urging a paradigm shift to save lives. Through his speaking engagements, Seyfried envisions a future where cancer loses its fear through effective, non-toxic management. He demands physician training and public awareness to adopt metabolic approaches, simplifying a disease overcomplicated by outdated theories.

Camus

74,454 views • 1 year ago

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood
1:00

"1,700 People In The US Die Everyday From Cancer...That's 70 Every Hour." Dr Thomas Seyfried, PhD "Cancer Is A very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control...It Is Not Genetic, Cancer Is A Metabolic Disease." Toxic Chemotherapy & Radiation Will Never Lower Cancer Rates. "The Problem Is Our Modern Lifestyle & Habits, We're Doing Everything Wrong. We're Inducing Cancer." "Cancer Is A Very Preventable Disorder. It's Within Your Control, Your Lifestyle, Your Habits." "When The Medical Establishment Acknowledges What I Know About This Disorder, What's Causing It & What We're Not Doing To Prevent It Or Treat It...It Will Be Recognized As The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine." "We Can Prevent It & Treat It With Metabolic Therapy. You Can Take Away The Risk & Fear Of Getting Cancer." Chemotherapy & Radiation have not reduced cancer rates. 1,700 people die everyday from cancer, that's 70 people every hour. Ketogenic Metabolic Cancer Prevention/Treatment: 1: Fasting For Autophagy & Mitochondrial Health 2: Carbohydrate Restriction/Glucose Elimination 3: Remove Inflammatory Toxic Seed Oils 4: Remove Processed Foods 5: Exercise To Induce Ketosis 6: Targeted Protocol For Cancer(Linked Below) Dr Thomas Seyfried Thomas N. Seyfried is a Professor of Biology, Genetics & Biochemistry at Boston College. He has over 150 peer-reviewed publications & the author of "Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management & Prevention of Cancer." "All Major Research Centers Believe Cancer Is A Genetic Disease. But That Belief Is In Stark Contrast To The Data. The Evidence Is Massive To Support That Cancer Is A Metabolic Disorder." "Wolves In The Wild Don't Die Of Cancer, Yet Our Pets #1 Killer Is Cancer. Their Food & Lifestyle Is Killing Them Too." "The Greatest Tragedy In The History Of Medicine Is Knowing The Cause Of Cancer & Yet The Medical Establishment Is Not Advising Changing Lifestyle To Prevent It Or As A Treatment." 👇Fasting/Ketogenic/Ivermectin Cancer Protocol👇 👇Dr Seyfried Case Report Curing Canine Cancer👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Lung/Brain Cancer Remission👇 Podcast: DiaryOfaCEO Video: @superfoodmood

Valerie Anne Smith

198,205 views • 1 year ago

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8 percent of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68 percent survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?
0:48

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8 percent of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68 percent survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?

Epoch Health

17,628 views • 2 months ago

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8% of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68% survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?
0:48

A ketogenic diet doesn’t just help with weight loss. It can drastically increase your odds of surviving one of the world’s deadliest cancers. By “drastic,” we don’t mean a modest improvement. We mean an eight-fold increase in survival. Dr. Shawn Baker explains: “There was a study published last year on brain tumors. About 20 patients. Half did a ketogenic diet, half did not.” “Over three years, 8% of the people that did not do the ketogenic diet survived, and 68% survived in the keto group.” That’s an eight-fold increase in survival. Baker explains that the mechanism traces back to Otto Warburg’s research: cancer cells preferentially absorb glucose. They feed on sugar. A ketogenic diet deprives cancer cells of their primary fuel source while providing ketones as an alternative energy source for healthy cells. Healthy cells can function just fine, whereas cancer cells starve and die. Dr. Thomas Seyfried of Boston College has been advocating ketogenic diets for cancer patients for years for this very reason. If you or a loved one were diagnosed with cancer today, would a ketogenic diet be part of your plan?

Epoch Health

13,091 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Thomas Seyfried (cancer researcher) drops a stark warning: Cancer is primarily a mitochondrial metabolic disorder—not just genetic. The key to slashing risk? Keep your mitochondria healthy so cells can't go dysregulated and ferment. His practical advice: - Live in semi-nutritional ketosis (like traditional/hunter-gatherer lifestyles where cancer is rare). - Track your Glucose Ketone Index (GKI) — aim to keep it below 20 (ideally much lower, e.g., 1-2 range for strong metabolic therapy per his research). - GKI = [glucose (mmol/L)] / [ketones (mmol/L)]. Lower = healthier mitochondria, remote cancer probability. - Modern life (processed carbs, obesity, inactivity, stress, screen addiction) damages mitochondria → obesity epidemic, childhood obesity as "canary in coal mine," rising young-adult cancers. If you binge and spike into red zone? Act fast to return to green—prevents cancer, diabetes, heart disease, dementia—all tied to mitochondrial dysfunction. Parents: Morbidly obese kids are on path to lifelong mitochondrial stress—knowledge gap is the real neglect. What's one step you're taking to protect your mitochondria (keto, fasting, exercise, etc.)?
3:17

Dr. Thomas Seyfried (cancer researcher) drops a stark warning: Cancer is primarily a mitochondrial metabolic disorder—not just genetic. The key to slashing risk? Keep your mitochondria healthy so cells can't go dysregulated and ferment. His practical advice: - Live in semi-nutritional ketosis (like traditional/hunter-gatherer lifestyles where cancer is rare). - Track your Glucose Ketone Index (GKI) — aim to keep it below 20 (ideally much lower, e.g., 1-2 range for strong metabolic therapy per his research). - GKI = [glucose (mmol/L)] / [ketones (mmol/L)]. Lower = healthier mitochondria, remote cancer probability. - Modern life (processed carbs, obesity, inactivity, stress, screen addiction) damages mitochondria → obesity epidemic, childhood obesity as "canary in coal mine," rising young-adult cancers. If you binge and spike into red zone? Act fast to return to green—prevents cancer, diabetes, heart disease, dementia—all tied to mitochondrial dysfunction. Parents: Morbidly obese kids are on path to lifelong mitochondrial stress—knowledge gap is the real neglect. What's one step you're taking to protect your mitochondria (keto, fasting, exercise, etc.)?

Camus

83,191 views • 5 months ago

How Much Sugar Do I Need To Function & To Be Healthy? The Amount Of Sugar That You Need To Function & Be Healthy Is...ZERO. There Is No Nutritional Requirement Whatsoever Of Sugar. None At All. You Don't Need Any. Dr Aseem Malhotra, Cardiologist You Don't Need Any Dietary Source Of Glucose. The Reason For That Is, Our Bodies Need Glucose To Survive, But You Don't Need Any Dietary Source Of Glucose To Survive. People go on Ketogenic Diets & they literally eliminate all starch as well, which also contains glucose, from their diet. Your body will make the glucose it needs from fat & protein. In terms of diets, there is no value from sugar whatsoever. Sugar can give you energy, but you can get energy from fat. Sugar has no nutritional value whatsoever. Zero. From a health perspective, there is zero requirement for dietary sugar. Carbohydrates are not an essential nutrient. We cannot have vibrant health or even live without protein & fat. The opposite is true of sugar & starch. We CAN have vibrant health & live a full energetic healthy life without sugar & starch(Carbohydrates). Excess sugar wreaks havoc on all systems in the body. Sooner or later the harm sets in as: Insulin Resistance & Inflammation Alzheimer's & Dementia Diabetes Cancer Glaucoma & Macular Degeneration Inflammation Arthritis Chronic Kidney Disease Pancreatitis Fatty Liver Disease Heart disease Gut Permeability Insomnia The Benefits Of Eliminating Most Sugar & Achieving The Fat Burning State Of Ketosis: Optimal Weight--Ketosis helps achieve optimal weight. Less hungry, full satiety & burning fat instead of glucose for energy. Improved Metabolic Health--Ketosis encourages healthy lipids, lowers TG, raises HDL & optimal blood pressure levels. Improved Brain Function--Ketosis heals Mental Illness brain dysfunction & treats neurological conditions like Alzheimer's & Parkinson's disease. Improved Blood Sugar Management--Ketosis, along with carbohydrate restriction, puts type 2 diabetes into remission. Improved Energy Levels--Ketosis increases your energy levels & keeps them stable by burning fat instead of glucose for energy. Reduced Risk of Disease--Ketosis reduces your risk of developing heart disease, metabolic syndrome & cancer. Improved Appetite Control--Ketosis makes you less hungry & eat less frequently. Improved Focus--Ketosis allows you to achieve laser powered focus. Improved Gut Microbiome--Ketosis increases the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes in your gut microbiome. 👇248 Low Carbohydrate Research Resources👇 👇Ketogenic Protocol For Cancer Prevention/Treat👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Heals Mental Illness👇 Speakers: Dr Aseem Malhotra & DiaryOfaCEO
0:47

How Much Sugar Do I Need To Function & To Be Healthy? The Amount Of Sugar That You Need To Function & Be Healthy Is...ZERO. There Is No Nutritional Requirement Whatsoever Of Sugar. None At All. You Don't Need Any. Dr Aseem Malhotra, Cardiologist You Don't Need Any Dietary Source Of Glucose. The Reason For That Is, Our Bodies Need Glucose To Survive, But You Don't Need Any Dietary Source Of Glucose To Survive. People go on Ketogenic Diets & they literally eliminate all starch as well, which also contains glucose, from their diet. Your body will make the glucose it needs from fat & protein. In terms of diets, there is no value from sugar whatsoever. Sugar can give you energy, but you can get energy from fat. Sugar has no nutritional value whatsoever. Zero. From a health perspective, there is zero requirement for dietary sugar. Carbohydrates are not an essential nutrient. We cannot have vibrant health or even live without protein & fat. The opposite is true of sugar & starch. We CAN have vibrant health & live a full energetic healthy life without sugar & starch(Carbohydrates). Excess sugar wreaks havoc on all systems in the body. Sooner or later the harm sets in as: Insulin Resistance & Inflammation Alzheimer's & Dementia Diabetes Cancer Glaucoma & Macular Degeneration Inflammation Arthritis Chronic Kidney Disease Pancreatitis Fatty Liver Disease Heart disease Gut Permeability Insomnia The Benefits Of Eliminating Most Sugar & Achieving The Fat Burning State Of Ketosis: Optimal Weight--Ketosis helps achieve optimal weight. Less hungry, full satiety & burning fat instead of glucose for energy. Improved Metabolic Health--Ketosis encourages healthy lipids, lowers TG, raises HDL & optimal blood pressure levels. Improved Brain Function--Ketosis heals Mental Illness brain dysfunction & treats neurological conditions like Alzheimer's & Parkinson's disease. Improved Blood Sugar Management--Ketosis, along with carbohydrate restriction, puts type 2 diabetes into remission. Improved Energy Levels--Ketosis increases your energy levels & keeps them stable by burning fat instead of glucose for energy. Reduced Risk of Disease--Ketosis reduces your risk of developing heart disease, metabolic syndrome & cancer. Improved Appetite Control--Ketosis makes you less hungry & eat less frequently. Improved Focus--Ketosis allows you to achieve laser powered focus. Improved Gut Microbiome--Ketosis increases the ratio of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes in your gut microbiome. 👇248 Low Carbohydrate Research Resources👇 👇Ketogenic Protocol For Cancer Prevention/Treat👇 👇Ketogenic Diet Heals Mental Illness👇 Speakers: Dr Aseem Malhotra & DiaryOfaCEO

Valerie Anne Smith

15,209 views • 1 year ago

World-renowned cancer researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried just dropped one of the most provocative statements you’ll hear from a tenured professor: “No tumor we have ever studied — and I’ve published the papers — can survive without glucose and glutamine. Starve those two fuels, put the body into nutritional ketosis with ketone levels the cancer cells can’t use, and the tumor cells get hammered and slowly die. At the very end you might need a touch of radiation or a little chemo to mop up the stragglers — but why isn’t metabolic therapy the FIRST line of attack for every patient?” Watch the 60-second clip below — he says it even more directly. This is the same Boston College professor who’s been publishing this metabolic theory of cancer for 15+ years and claims most cancers are a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily a genetic one. Oncologists: what’s the strongest counter-evidence to his claims? Patients & researchers: have you seen this approach used in practice? Drop studies, critiques, or real-world experience — I read every reply. (Sharing a scientist’s public statements only — this is not medical advice)
0:59

World-renowned cancer researcher Dr. Thomas Seyfried just dropped one of the most provocative statements you’ll hear from a tenured professor: “No tumor we have ever studied — and I’ve published the papers — can survive without glucose and glutamine. Starve those two fuels, put the body into nutritional ketosis with ketone levels the cancer cells can’t use, and the tumor cells get hammered and slowly die. At the very end you might need a touch of radiation or a little chemo to mop up the stragglers — but why isn’t metabolic therapy the FIRST line of attack for every patient?” Watch the 60-second clip below — he says it even more directly. This is the same Boston College professor who’s been publishing this metabolic theory of cancer for 15+ years and claims most cancers are a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily a genetic one. Oncologists: what’s the strongest counter-evidence to his claims? Patients & researchers: have you seen this approach used in practice? Drop studies, critiques, or real-world experience — I read every reply. (Sharing a scientist’s public statements only — this is not medical advice)

Camus

448,574 views • 9 months ago

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?
1:25

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols?

Valerie Anne Smith

262,596 views • 8 months ago

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.
1:47

Can people in power/ authority kindly stop with this absolute BS on "fasting killing cancer cells" and citing religious nonsense to appeal to peoples emotions? Fasting is really quite dangerous for cancer patients in real life. Let me explain and bury this myth once and for all, especially for science illiterates like this guy. [1] The most common argument is that fasting "starves" cancer by cutting off its sugar (glucose) supply. While it is true that cancer cells consume vast amounts of glucose, they are biologically aggressive survivalists. If you stop eating, your body eventually switches to burning fat and breaking down muscle for energy. Cancer cells are highly adaptable; when glucose is low, many types of cancer can mutate to feed on other fuel sources, such as lactate, amino acids (from your muscles), or fatty acids. You cannot simply "starve" a tumor without starving the patient first. [2] Fasting is dangerous for cancer patients because of cancer cachexia - a wasting syndrome where the body loses muscle and fat rapidly. Cachexia is responsible for up to 30% of cancer deaths. Cancer puts the body in a hyper-metabolic state (burning energy fast). If a patient fasts, they risk accelerating muscle loss and weakening their immune system. A weak body cannot tolerate life-saving treatments like chemotherapy or radiation, nor can it fight off infections. [3] Most claims about fasting curing cancer come from studies on mice or cells in a petri dish. In a dish: You can kill cancer cells with almost anything (lemon juice, bleach, starvation, even shooting a bullet at it at close point or using a grenade to destroy the entire lab) because they have no immune system or body to protect them. In a human: The biology is infinitely more complex. Human metabolism, hormonal fluctuations, and tumor micro-environments mean that what shrinks a tumor in a mouse often fails completely in human trials. [4] Proponents often cite "autophagy" (the body's cellular recycling process triggered by fasting) as the cure. They claim it cleans out cancerous cells. Science shows that autophagy is a double-edged sword. -In all people, autophagy is a normal physiological process - whether fasting or not, which help in cleaning up damaged cells. -But in patients with cancer, once a tumor exists, cancer cells can actually hijack autophagy to survive stress (like chemotherapy) and repair themselves. In this context, fasting could theoretically help the cancer survive the treatment intended to kill it. [5] "Cancer" is not one disease; it is over 200 different diseases characterized by uncontrolled cell growth. Some cancers are driven by hormones, some by genetic mutations, and some by viruses. A fasting protocol that slows down one specific type of breast cancer might have zero effect on pancreatic cancer, or worse, accelerate a different type. The most lethal aspect of this misinformation is the delay in treatment. Cancer is a time-sensitive disease. While a patient spends months trying to fast the cancer away based on religious or alternative advice, the cancer often metastasizes (spreads) to other organs. Once cancer spreads, it often moves from being curable to being terminal. Relying solely on fasting wastes the critical window where medical intervention could have saved a life. Suggesting a single "ancient cure" for 200 complex genetic diseases is scientifically illogical... ...and generally stupid, as this video proves.

TheLiverDoc™

193,453 views • 7 months ago

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.
0:59

A Physicians Survey Revealed 88.3% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment. The 5 Year Chemo Survival Rate Is Only 2.1%, Yet Most Oncologists Only Offer 'Standard Of Care' To Patients. Dr Seyfried Would Choose The Protocol With Ivermectin & Fasting. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Board of Directors has data that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer even though they advise chemo & radiation as the only 'approved' treatment to their patients. MacKillop & colleagues found that a survey of Canadian doctors who treat lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis. Lind & colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston & found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer. "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies" cites...The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists believe that cancer is genetic, but cancer is a metabolic disease. Doctors don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy & don't even know that chemotherapy historically was a 'weapon of war' mustard gas. Banned from use in war because it is cytotoxic & too inhumane, even against war enemies. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation than natural intervention. Chemotherapy is not the answer to heal the body of cancer. GKI Glucose Ketone Index & Cancer Eradication Based On Otto Warburg's Groundbreaking Research: Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible & cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells. A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose & increases ketone production. This starves cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source. Research shows a low glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells & T-cells to become even stronger which are crucial for killing cancer. Chemotherapy & radiation actually kills our NK Natural Killer Cells allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment. 15 expert physicians & oncologists have published...'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol.' This is the step by step protocol of fasting, high fat ketogenic diet (eliminating glucose) & using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients with lifestyle changes for cancer treatment remission. This protocol, along with cited research is linked in the replies. Have you used non traditional methods to reverse cancer? Is your cancer in remission thanks to fasting, ivermectin or other alternative protocols? Share and repost this message to increase awareness. It is essential for the public to be informed. Follow my page for further motivational and educational content.

Joe Tippens

47,858 views • 6 months ago

74% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment & Would Instead Use Alternative Real Cancer Cures For Themselves. Doctors Cite Chemotherapy As Unacceptably Cytotoxic & The 5 Year Survival Rate Is Only 2.1% Yet, Doctors Push Chemo Onto Their Own Patients. In the MacKillop et al study, only 17% of medical oncologists said that they would take chemotherapy for painful bone metastases & spine cancer. Even with modern chemotherapy, less than 30% of medical oncologists & oncology nurses would take chemotherapy. Cited in "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies"... The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Chemotherapy is incredibly toxic & must be handled in the clinical setting as a biohazard. Medical professionals who handle its contents in a hospital setting must wear protective gear for personal protection from the poisonous features of chemotherapy liquids. Chemotherapy came from one of the cruelest weapons ever invented as it was a weapon of war called Mustard Gas. Mustard Gas was banned in 1925 for being used as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm & inhumane use against war enemies. After that, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue & decided to market it as a drug for profit. The 1st chemotherapy drug was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), which is a Nitrogen Mustard. Currently, 5 Nitrogen Mustards are used in Chemotherapy including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body from cancer. Scientists Have Known Since the 1930s That Fasting Starves Cancer Cells… So Why Is It Ignored? 🤔 Dr. Otto Warburg (Nobel Prize winner) discovered that cancer cells thrive on glucose (sugar). He found that cancer cells have a damaged metabolism, meaning they rely almost entirely on fermenting sugar for energy—unlike healthy cells, which can switch to fat or ketones. ✅ Fasting drops blood sugar & insulin levels – Starving cancer of its preferred fuel. ✅ Increases ketones – Cancer cells cannot use ketones for energy & thus starve & die off. ✅ Triggers autophagy – The body removes damaged cells, including pre-cancerous ones. ✅ Boosts immune function – Fasting increases white blood cell regeneration, helping fight disease. 🚨 So why don’t doctors recommend fasting? Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation patients than a free, natural intervention. Meanwhile, studies show fasting + a ketogenic diet slows tumor growth, shrinks tumors & makes complete remission possible. But instead of researching this further, mainstream medicine pushes drugs & expensive treatments. Dr William Makis & Dr Paul Marik, along with many leading physicians & oncologists have developed a groundbreaking protocol entitled: 'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol' which involves a thorough step by step protocol of fasting & eliminating all glucose from the diet, while using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients & lifestyle changes for cancer treatment into remission. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Oncologists Would Not Choose Chemotherapy👇 👇5 Year Survival On Cancer Malignancies Chemo👇 👇Dr Thomas Seyfried: Cancer Metabolic Disease👇 Speaker: Dr Eric Berg
0:25

74% Of Doctors Would Refuse Chemotherapy For Their Own Cancer Treatment & Would Instead Use Alternative Real Cancer Cures For Themselves. Doctors Cite Chemotherapy As Unacceptably Cytotoxic & The 5 Year Survival Rate Is Only 2.1% Yet, Doctors Push Chemo Onto Their Own Patients. In the MacKillop et al study, only 17% of medical oncologists said that they would take chemotherapy for painful bone metastases & spine cancer. Even with modern chemotherapy, less than 30% of medical oncologists & oncology nurses would take chemotherapy. Cited in "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies"... The overall contribution of curative & adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia & 2.1% in the USA. Chemotherapy is incredibly toxic & must be handled in the clinical setting as a biohazard. Medical professionals who handle its contents in a hospital setting must wear protective gear for personal protection from the poisonous features of chemotherapy liquids. Chemotherapy came from one of the cruelest weapons ever invented as it was a weapon of war called Mustard Gas. Mustard Gas was banned in 1925 for being used as a weapon of war, citing it's deadly harm & inhumane use against war enemies. After that, researchers found it destroyed bone marrow & lymphatic tissue & decided to market it as a drug for profit. The 1st chemotherapy drug was Mechlorethamine Hydrochloride (HN2), which is a Nitrogen Mustard. Currently, 5 Nitrogen Mustards are used in Chemotherapy including Mechlorethamine, Cyclophosphamide, Ifosfamide, Melphalan & Chlorambucil. Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body from cancer. Scientists Have Known Since the 1930s That Fasting Starves Cancer Cells… So Why Is It Ignored? 🤔 Dr. Otto Warburg (Nobel Prize winner) discovered that cancer cells thrive on glucose (sugar). He found that cancer cells have a damaged metabolism, meaning they rely almost entirely on fermenting sugar for energy—unlike healthy cells, which can switch to fat or ketones. ✅ Fasting drops blood sugar & insulin levels – Starving cancer of its preferred fuel. ✅ Increases ketones – Cancer cells cannot use ketones for energy & thus starve & die off. ✅ Triggers autophagy – The body removes damaged cells, including pre-cancerous ones. ✅ Boosts immune function – Fasting increases white blood cell regeneration, helping fight disease. 🚨 So why don’t doctors recommend fasting? Cancer treatment is a multi-billion dollar industry. Most oncologists don’t study nutrition or metabolic therapy. The system profits more from lifelong chemo & radiation patients than a free, natural intervention. Meanwhile, studies show fasting + a ketogenic diet slows tumor growth, shrinks tumors & makes complete remission possible. But instead of researching this further, mainstream medicine pushes drugs & expensive treatments. Dr William Makis & Dr Paul Marik, along with many leading physicians & oncologists have developed a groundbreaking protocol entitled: 'Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol' which involves a thorough step by step protocol of fasting & eliminating all glucose from the diet, while using ivermectin, fenbendazole & supportive nutrients & lifestyle changes for cancer treatment into remission. ⏩ ⏪ 👇Oncologists Would Not Choose Chemotherapy👇 👇5 Year Survival On Cancer Malignancies Chemo👇 👇Dr Thomas Seyfried: Cancer Metabolic Disease👇 Speaker: Dr Eric Berg

Valerie Anne Smith

286,694 views • 11 months ago

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.
0:21

The Dangerous Cult of 'Fasting' Influencers. Fasting has its anecdotal benefits, yes. But it is overrated. And water fasting is highly overrated. But this video featuring a Cardiologist is amusingly nonsense. There is no study from Boston (from a "University?" - how vague!) that says 7-days water fasting reduces risk of cancer (what cancer?) by 70%. And there is no proof that fasting kills cancer cells in humans. Here is what fasting does to cancers in humans. Nothing. Fasting is now become a sort of religion-like cult for wellness influencers to rake in views and engagement. From a scientific standpoint, there are no realistically good human studies to prove anything from fasting that benefits cancers. I know, I know, "autophagy" and all that. Autophagy: Autophagy is the natural, conserved degradation of the cell that removes unnecessary or dysfunctional components. Yes, its a legit term and all. But in the context of cancer reduction and fasting in humans, it sounds like "immunity boosting," another wellness fraud term. The effects of fasting on cancer cells are all based on MOUSE studies, and none explicitly translated to humans. See this paper: everything is based on cells and tissues and small animal experiments: "While research on the subject is tantalizing, there’s little clinical evidence involving humans to substantiate the claims. Studies on the potential impacts on cancer treatment from various forms of fasting or calorie restriction, including the possibility that they reduce side effects, have been limited." "Fasting may not be appropriate for malnourished individuals or those with cancer cachexia, which results in a continuing loss of skeletal muscle mass, or for people with chronic diseases. Those with diabetes need to be very careful, because of the risk of hypoglycemia." "Based on our systematic review and meta-analysis, there is currently no evidence supporting the superiority of therapeutic fasting over non-fasting in preventing chemotherapy toxicity." - see here: Even intermittent fasting (IF) is overrated in cancer. "IF may be considered in adults seeking cancer-prevention benefits through means of weight management, butwhether IF itself affects cancer-related metabolic and molecular pathways remains unanswered. See here: Also this: "Fasting for short periods does not have any beneficial effect on the quality of life of cancer patients during treatment. Evidence on fasting regimes reducing side effects and toxicities of chemotherapy is missing." See here: The whole aspect of "fasting reducing cancer incidence" in the real world is just due to weight loss. Obesity is associated with at least 13 types of cancers and reversing obesity reduces risk of cancer - nothing to do with fasting killing off cancers cells in the body. And one can lose weight even without fasting. See here: Everything from prevention of adverse events of cancer, to reduction in side effects from chemotherapy, to slowing cancer growth by reducing glucose levels, to promoting cell regeneration by affecting autophagy is all LAB BASED MOLECULAR LEVEL HYPOTHESIS that has not been proven conclusively in humans. See here: Cancer patients must not starve. They must remain hydrated and they must eat a well balanced diet because cancer condition is highly demanding. And dont water fast for 7 days. Easy for people to make reels on it, but in real life, it may prove disastrous. Water fast does make you lose weight (because of starvation) but it is not at all a healthy way to lose weight. Stop with this fasting and cancer madness already.

TheLiverDoc™

269,527 views • 2 years ago