Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Dragonfly's Haseeb ＞|＜ explains why AI agents will use crypto rather than the traditional financial system: “You can see it right now on Moltbook. Agents are trying to find ways to pay each other for things. It's very primitive right now, but you can see where it's going." "If... I have an agent and you have an agent, you live in a different country or I don't even know who you are, it's very difficult for me to pay you with the traditional financial system. It's not really designed to have non-human recipients of money." "We don't really know how the laws are going to work, how taxes are going to work, whereas crypto doesn't ask any of those questions. I think we're going to see this become an increasing part of the story of how AI agents are going to become more and more autonomous."show more

TBPN

310,922 subscribers

44,248 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

Alex Karp's take on the Department of War designating Anthropic as a supply chain risk: "In the warfighting context, the Department of War has to be the arbiter of what gets deployed." "I want to split domestic and foreign. In this country have God-given rights [like the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments]...Adversaries trying to kill us do not have those rights. And I've never believed in extending our rights to foreign countries that are adversarial to us." "On domestic stuff...there are real issues. I'm super sympathetic with restrictions around the use of these products in the domestic context." "Just to give you an example, there are datasets that are publicly available in the US market that I don't think should be used against you and me in a law enforcement context with the help of AI agents and ontology." "But if you don't use [this] on the battlefield, obviously Iran's going to use [it]. You don't think they can go online and buy those products?" "Without going into somewhat classified data, those things in combination with other things — [they're] lethal. A lot of people who want to hurt America end up dead because of our ability to aggregate and then figure out what's going on in the battlefield before they can figure out what we're doing." "So I'm very much in favor of it for moral reasons. But I'm also in favor of it because I don't know how else you explain this to the American people. We're going to take your job, we're going to eviscerate your ability to have money and power, but we're not going to defend you on the battlefield?"

TBPN

57,054 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

If you look up to me, you are not allowed to stay broke or weak. How are you going to say you like my content but don't even hit the gym? If you are any sort of fan of mine, you have work to do. Become a superhero.

If you look up to me, you are not allowed to stay broke or weak. How are you going to say you like my content but don't even hit the gym? If you are any sort of fan of mine, you have work to do. Become a superhero.

Andrew Tate

656,163 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

''We are now going to have an airport that is futuristic, we are going to have an airport that in the next 20years you will not see a situation where we are going to go beyond the capacity.'' -Minister of Aviation, Festus Keyamo #SundayPolitics

''We are now going to have an airport that is futuristic, we are going to have an airport that in the next 20years you will not see a situation where we are going to go beyond the capacity.'' -Minister of Aviation, Festus Keyamo #SundayPolitics

Channels Television

16,522 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,349 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space

Agents will eventually outnumber humans by orders of magnitude. Aaron Levie on the infrastructure that will be needed to manage them: "Whether you think the number is 10x or 100x... we're going to have some order of magnitude more agents than people." "There's going to be just incredibly spectacularly crazy security incidents that will happen with agents, because you'll prompt-inject an agent and find your way through the CRM system and pull out data you shouldn't have access to." "How do you make sure you have the right security, the permissions, the access controls, the data governance?" "We actually don't yet exactly know in many cases how we're going to regulate some of these agents." "No matter what, there's going to need to be a layer that manages the data they have access to and the workflows they're involved in." "This is the new infrastructure opportunity in the era of agents." Aaron Levie on Latent.Space

a16z

64,371 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This thought is converging from many sides. Transformer based LLMs are not going take us to human level AI. That famous Yann LeCun interview. "We are not going to get to human level AI by just scaling up MLMs. This is just not going to happen. There's no way. Okay, absolutely no way. And whatever you can hear from some of my uh more adventurous colleagues, it's not going to happen within the next two years. There's absolutely no way in hell. You know the idea that we're we're going to have you know a country of genius in a data center that's complete BS. There's absolutely no way what we're going to have maybe is systems that are trained on sufficiently large amounts of data that any question that any reasonable person may ask will will find an answer through those systems and it would feel like you have a PhD sitting next to you but it's not a PhD you have next to you. It's system with a gigantic memory and retrieval ability not not a system that can invent solutions to to new problems, which is really what a PhD is. " -------- From "Alex Kantrowitz" YT Channel (full video link in comment)

This thought is converging from many sides. Transformer based LLMs are not going take us to human level AI. That famous Yann LeCun interview. "We are not going to get to human level AI by just scaling up MLMs. This is just not going to happen. There's no way. Okay, absolutely no way. And whatever you can hear from some of my uh more adventurous colleagues, it's not going to happen within the next two years. There's absolutely no way in hell. You know the idea that we're we're going to have you know a country of genius in a data center that's complete BS. There's absolutely no way what we're going to have maybe is systems that are trained on sufficiently large amounts of data that any question that any reasonable person may ask will will find an answer through those systems and it would feel like you have a PhD sitting next to you but it's not a PhD you have next to you. It's system with a gigantic memory and retrieval ability not not a system that can invent solutions to to new problems, which is really what a PhD is. " -------- From "Alex Kantrowitz" YT Channel (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

522,272 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Airtable's Howie Liu says that basically everyone will need to graduate from being ICs to ICs that manage teams of 20-30 agents: "The best developers today don't just sit there in front of their IDEs and synchronously talk to their agent." "[Instead], you have like 30 separate branches that are each being worked on by a different agent. And you can have the agents continue to update the branches based on human and other agent feedback." "And I think this whole idea of it taking hours for that entire loop to complete — agent pushes some changes, the changes get feedback from other agents or humans, the agent responds to that — that whole loop could be hours, not just minutes. So you're not going to just sit there and watch it one at a time." "But the powerful thing about this is, each one is still actually operating faster than a human engineer. One agent on one branch can do the work of maybe three humans, operating 3x as fast. So it's like a 10x leverage factor just for one agent." "But the best engineers are now able to multitask and say, 'I'm going to oversee my own little team of 20-30 agents working concurrently.'" "Everyone needs to graduate from being an IC to an IC manager of agents. Meaning, if you're a VC analyst, your job should no longer be to go synchronously research one company. You need to go and research like 30 companies, and do them all faster, better, and higher quality than you could before." "That's the greatest leap that is going to be challenging for a lot of people in a lot of roles. Because it's a totally different mentality in how you operate, and what your role is."

Airtable's Howie Liu says that basically everyone will need to graduate from being ICs to ICs that manage teams of 20-30 agents: "The best developers today don't just sit there in front of their IDEs and synchronously talk to their agent." "[Instead], you have like 30 separate branches that are each being worked on by a different agent. And you can have the agents continue to update the branches based on human and other agent feedback." "And I think this whole idea of it taking hours for that entire loop to complete — agent pushes some changes, the changes get feedback from other agents or humans, the agent responds to that — that whole loop could be hours, not just minutes. So you're not going to just sit there and watch it one at a time." "But the powerful thing about this is, each one is still actually operating faster than a human engineer. One agent on one branch can do the work of maybe three humans, operating 3x as fast. So it's like a 10x leverage factor just for one agent." "But the best engineers are now able to multitask and say, 'I'm going to oversee my own little team of 20-30 agents working concurrently.'" "Everyone needs to graduate from being an IC to an IC manager of agents. Meaning, if you're a VC analyst, your job should no longer be to go synchronously research one company. You need to go and research like 30 companies, and do them all faster, better, and higher quality than you could before." "That's the greatest leap that is going to be challenging for a lot of people in a lot of roles. Because it's a totally different mentality in how you operate, and what your role is."

TBPN

35,528 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Summer Lee on I've had it podcast : "I think that it gets more difficult before it gets better. You know, I think that we're in an era right now where voters are really demanding something that I think is a bit unusual, right? Uh and that is that the Democratic party, our elected officials choose them, right? There is more active participation. And sometimes I think the Democrats mistake lack of voting or that type of, you know, electoral engagement for engagement or for apathy. But people aren't apathetic. People are incredibly tuned into this. And when they see our elected officials taking just remarkable amounts of dollars from, for instance, Apac or other super PACs, it's discouraging to them. It's disenfranchised. It's disappointing. And right now, Americans are saying, "We don't want Forever Wars. We don't want our tax dollars to go to continuing genocides or expanding them." And they're very, very clear about that. So, I think that the Democratic Party's going to have to get they're going to have to wake up to this one. And I think that it's not going to go away. And I think that perhaps they're hoping that it just does."

Summer Lee on I've had it podcast : "I think that it gets more difficult before it gets better. You know, I think that we're in an era right now where voters are really demanding something that I think is a bit unusual, right? Uh and that is that the Democratic party, our elected officials choose them, right? There is more active participation. And sometimes I think the Democrats mistake lack of voting or that type of, you know, electoral engagement for engagement or for apathy. But people aren't apathetic. People are incredibly tuned into this. And when they see our elected officials taking just remarkable amounts of dollars from, for instance, Apac or other super PACs, it's discouraging to them. It's disenfranchised. It's disappointing. And right now, Americans are saying, "We don't want Forever Wars. We don't want our tax dollars to go to continuing genocides or expanding them." And they're very, very clear about that. So, I think that the Democratic Party's going to have to get they're going to have to wake up to this one. And I think that it's not going to go away. And I think that perhaps they're hoping that it just does."

It's politics

116,198 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Nick responds to an Australia First Patriot asking if they should start a show. "You live in a police state, so what are you going to do?.. We don't have the same kind of hate speech laws that you have there. It's hard for me to say, I would say it's very risky."

Nick responds to an Australia First Patriot asking if they should start a show. "You live in a police state, so what are you going to do?.. We don't have the same kind of hate speech laws that you have there. It's hard for me to say, I would say it's very risky."

Asuka Groyper 🚬

40,765 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Craig Counsell on struggling Cubs: "You know it's going to get better. I do believe in a lot of the things our hitters are trying to do. You don't always get what you want the day you ... start it. "Our guys are going to get it. And our hitters are going to get it."

Craig Counsell on struggling Cubs: "You know it's going to get better. I do believe in a lot of the things our hitters are trying to do. You don't always get what you want the day you ... start it. "Our guys are going to get it. And our hitters are going to get it."

104.3 The Score

35,555 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

.Aaron Levie says AI agents may take years to diffuse from engineering into the rest of knowledge work. "The models are really good at code, and the work is verifiable." "You have 5 or 10 things that make agents work in an enterprise context for engineering." "The users are less technical, the data is much more fragmented, the systems are much more legacy." "That's why it's going to be a number of years for this diffusion to roll from what we're seeing in Silicon Valley, into the rest of knowledge work."

.Aaron Levie says AI agents may take years to diffuse from engineering into the rest of knowledge work. "The models are really good at code, and the work is verifiable." "You have 5 or 10 things that make agents work in an enterprise context for engineering." "The users are less technical, the data is much more fragmented, the systems are much more legacy." "That's why it's going to be a number of years for this diffusion to roll from what we're seeing in Silicon Valley, into the rest of knowledge work."

MTS

13,046 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Governor DeSantis applauds the Florida House for addressing property taxes but says his plan is NOT going to happen in regular session, but he will call a SPECIAL SESSION. “It's going to get done and you guys are going to be able to go to the polls and be able to vote something that's really meaningful. I just think at the end of the day, your home is your castle. You either own it or you don't, right? And if you have to keep paying tax to the government your whole life just to live on your own property, do you really own it then if they can take it back from you if you don't pay?”

🚨Governor DeSantis applauds the Florida House for addressing property taxes but says his plan is NOT going to happen in regular session, but he will call a SPECIAL SESSION. “It's going to get done and you guys are going to be able to go to the polls and be able to vote something that's really meaningful. I just think at the end of the day, your home is your castle. You either own it or you don't, right? And if you have to keep paying tax to the government your whole life just to live on your own property, do you really own it then if they can take it back from you if you don't pay?”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

31,662 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

NEW: Joe Lonsdale on CNBC responding to Paul Tudor Jones' AI warning. Joe Lonsdale: It's very funny because I'm here in town and you're debating with the private equity and other guys about AI, and a lot of them are saying, oh, it's not even having a big enough effect to affect margins. And I think it will. And then all the way over here, it's actually so good that it's going to kill everyone. And I think it's probably somewhere in the middle where it is going to have a big impact. I'm not as worried about that. Andrew Ross Sorkin: But one of the things he [Paul Tudor Jones] said is that the folks who are running these large language models... I think every single one of them was in the scary camp, and they're the ones who are actually doing it. Joe: A lot of people building the model companies are very optimistic that they're going to be able to keep making these things much, much better. I hope they're right, because we need to keep getting better to have a really positive impact. I guess if you believe that it's exponential and going to get better forever, then it could change everything. I don't think these things are exponential. I think there's just a lot of other things we have to figure out before it changes the whole world. Joe Kernen: Is it possible that we could hit the singularity with AI and we could all live forever instead of all dying? Isn't there a half-full side of things? Joe: I don't think singularity is really how it's going to work. I don't think the world just goes in exponentials and completely changes... Joe Kernen: You get some sort of a hybrid, you know, part hardware and part software on a human being. Joe: In the bio world right now we're figuring out a lot of stuff about aging, and AI is probably going to be a big thing there. Joe Kernen: half of us are going to be dead, or half of us are going to live forever? Joe: There are new threats where you get crazy terrorists doing things in bio. You've got to be careful. Joe Kernen: Fauci? Joe: That's a separate topic 🤣

NEW: Joe Lonsdale on CNBC responding to Paul Tudor Jones' AI warning. Joe Lonsdale: It's very funny because I'm here in town and you're debating with the private equity and other guys about AI, and a lot of them are saying, oh, it's not even having a big enough effect to affect margins. And I think it will. And then all the way over here, it's actually so good that it's going to kill everyone. And I think it's probably somewhere in the middle where it is going to have a big impact. I'm not as worried about that. Andrew Ross Sorkin: But one of the things he [Paul Tudor Jones] said is that the folks who are running these large language models... I think every single one of them was in the scary camp, and they're the ones who are actually doing it. Joe: A lot of people building the model companies are very optimistic that they're going to be able to keep making these things much, much better. I hope they're right, because we need to keep getting better to have a really positive impact. I guess if you believe that it's exponential and going to get better forever, then it could change everything. I don't think these things are exponential. I think there's just a lot of other things we have to figure out before it changes the whole world. Joe Kernen: Is it possible that we could hit the singularity with AI and we could all live forever instead of all dying? Isn't there a half-full side of things? Joe: I don't think singularity is really how it's going to work. I don't think the world just goes in exponentials and completely changes... Joe Kernen: You get some sort of a hybrid, you know, part hardware and part software on a human being. Joe: In the bio world right now we're figuring out a lot of stuff about aging, and AI is probably going to be a big thing there. Joe Kernen: half of us are going to be dead, or half of us are going to live forever? Joe: There are new threats where you get crazy terrorists doing things in bio. You've got to be careful. Joe Kernen: Fauci? Joe: That's a separate topic 🤣

American Optimist

81,030 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith *GOES OFF* on Zohran Mamdani after election win🚨 "I'm not happy about it ... I'm very, very concerned about some of the things that he said. I'm very concerned about what he once said about defunding the police." "I don't want to see less police officers. I want to see more police officers ... I don't want to hear about no d*mn mental health experts in subways!" "Free buses, free grocery stores in each borough? Really? Really think that's going to work?" "Are you really going to be able to freeze rent — or are you going to end up hiking it — because you don't have enough people here to pay it!?" "The people who love Mamdani the most are not people who pay bills every day! ... You don’t see business owners clamoring to support him!" Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith GOES OFF on Zohran Mamdani after election win🚨 "I'm not happy about it ... I'm very, very concerned about some of the things that he said. I'm very concerned about what he once said about defunding the police." "I don't want to see less police officers. I want to see more police officers ... I don't want to hear about no d*mn mental health experts in subways!" "Free buses, free grocery stores in each borough? Really? Really think that's going to work?" "Are you really going to be able to freeze rent — or are you going to end up hiking it — because you don't have enough people here to pay it!?" "The people who love Mamdani the most are not people who pay bills every day! ... You don’t see business owners clamoring to support him!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

1,208,883 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: On India Vs Pakistan Asia Cup 2025 match, Actor Suniel Shetty says, "It's a world sporting body. They have to abide by those rules and regulations because there are a lot of other sports and a lot of athletes who are involved in them. As Indians, I think that is our personal call that we have to take, whether we want to see it, whether we don't want to see it, whether we want to go or not go and that's a call India has to take but you cannot blame cricketers for playing because they are sportsmen, they are expected to represent the country. I think that's a call we have to take. If I'm not going to see it, I'm not going to see it. It's for you to decide what each one of you wants to do. It's not in BCCI's hands. It's a world sporting body and you can't blame anybody..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On India Vs Pakistan Asia Cup 2025 match, Actor Suniel Shetty says, "It's a world sporting body. They have to abide by those rules and regulations because there are a lot of other sports and a lot of athletes who are involved in them. As Indians, I think that is our personal call that we have to take, whether we want to see it, whether we don't want to see it, whether we want to go or not go and that's a call India has to take but you cannot blame cricketers for playing because they are sportsmen, they are expected to represent the country. I think that's a call we have to take. If I'm not going to see it, I'm not going to see it. It's for you to decide what each one of you wants to do. It's not in BCCI's hands. It's a world sporting body and you can't blame anybody..."

ANI

668,168 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Catch the best AI agents before everyone else. We’ve built an AI agent that tracks , your go-to source for insights on agent activity in crypto. Want to know which agents are making waves—and how to get in early? Now you can. 🎥👇

Catch the best AI agents before everyone else. We’ve built an AI agent that tracks , your go-to source for insights on agent activity in crypto. Want to know which agents are making waves—and how to get in early? Now you can. 🎥👇

Orbit

72,642 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It's going to be a great day today. You know how I know? DHS agents are up conducting a big raid getting more illegal aliens out of our country and the sun isn't even up yet. You guys never cease to amaze me.

It's going to be a great day today. You know how I know? DHS agents are up conducting a big raid getting more illegal aliens out of our country and the sun isn't even up yet. You guys never cease to amaze me.

Kim "Katie" USA

61,365 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“Do you see how scary this is?”: CrowdStrike CEO on AI Agents communicating around human guardrails George Kurtz: “There was a customer who basically created a whole suite of AI agents to help their automation in their IT department.” “So they had one agent that was looking for IT problems, software bugs.” “It found something. So the agent said, ‘Hey, I found this bug. I want to fix it, but I don’t have access to fix it.’” “So it went to the Slack channel that had the other 99 agents and said, ‘Hey, does any other agent have access to this thing,’ because they need it fixed. And there was an agent that raised its hand and said, ‘Oh, I have access, and I can fix it.’” “Do you see how scary this is? These two agents are reasoning, and they went right around the guardrails that were put in place.” @jason: “This is unintended consequences and these LLMs are essentially guessing what you want them to do.” “They're reasoning it. ‘Oh, it is reasonable for me to go ask for help. It is reasonable for me to give help.’ Now, what if it pushes the wrong code? What if it makes a mistake? And then how do you ever track that down? Who's monitoring these agents?” “The agent technology has unlimited upside, but my lord, you're going to be in business for a long time.” Kurtz: “Well, this is it. It's called AIDR. AI Detection and Response.” “And this is why it's a huge opportunity for us because on average each employee is going to have about 90 agents they control.” “So we're going to have protection and visibility across all of those agents, whether it's from a third party or whether it's a homegrown agent, and that is a massive TAM opportunity for us.” ------------------------------------ Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: On Public, you can invest in stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. Plus, build your own custom index with AI. Get started at — investing for those who take it seriously.

“Do you see how scary this is?”: CrowdStrike CEO on AI Agents communicating around human guardrails George Kurtz: “There was a customer who basically created a whole suite of AI agents to help their automation in their IT department.” “So they had one agent that was looking for IT problems, software bugs.” “It found something. So the agent said, ‘Hey, I found this bug. I want to fix it, but I don’t have access to fix it.’” “So it went to the Slack channel that had the other 99 agents and said, ‘Hey, does any other agent have access to this thing,’ because they need it fixed. And there was an agent that raised its hand and said, ‘Oh, I have access, and I can fix it.’” “Do you see how scary this is? These two agents are reasoning, and they went right around the guardrails that were put in place.” @jason: “This is unintended consequences and these LLMs are essentially guessing what you want them to do.” “They're reasoning it. ‘Oh, it is reasonable for me to go ask for help. It is reasonable for me to give help.’ Now, what if it pushes the wrong code? What if it makes a mistake? And then how do you ever track that down? Who's monitoring these agents?” “The agent technology has unlimited upside, but my lord, you're going to be in business for a long time.” Kurtz: “Well, this is it. It's called AIDR. AI Detection and Response.” “And this is why it's a huge opportunity for us because on average each employee is going to have about 90 agents they control.” “So we're going to have protection and visibility across all of those agents, whether it's from a third party or whether it's a homegrown agent, and that is a massive TAM opportunity for us.” ------------------------------------ Thanks to our partner for making this happen!: On Public, you can invest in stocks, options, bonds, and crypto. Plus, build your own custom index with AI. Get started at — investing for those who take it seriously.

The All-In Podcast

108,941 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Sellers: You talk about America first, but you have people out here who cannot make ends meet. You have you have prices at the tank skyrocketing daily. You have American soldiers dying, and then you have the audacity to tell congresspersons that they're supposed to come back and vote for a $200 billion supplemental for a war we don't know how we're going to get out of, or how much it's going to cost, or how many lives are going to die as a result of something with no objectives.

Sellers: You talk about America first, but you have people out here who cannot make ends meet. You have you have prices at the tank skyrocketing daily. You have American soldiers dying, and then you have the audacity to tell congresspersons that they're supposed to come back and vote for a $200 billion supplemental for a war we don't know how we're going to get out of, or how much it's going to cost, or how many lives are going to die as a result of something with no objectives.

Acyn

87,509 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten