正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

DRIPA is the number one issue on people’s minds right across British Columbia. This BC Supreme Court decision in Richmond affects every single property owner in our province. The lack of clear language has created massive uncertainty about what “Aboriginal governance” actually means and what future deals will look...

32,647 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 The fear over aboriginal land claims and governance is real. No one else running for Leader of the Conservative Party of B.C. knows this issue and its consequences like I do. This is not an an academic exercise. Years ago, when I was a young Mom with little kids, the Musqueam First Nation sued me and my homeowner neighbours over a leasehold land dispute, that ended up costing us $1.5m in legal and expert fees. We lost all equity in our homes due to the excessive demands from Musqueam FN. We couldn’t raise a mortgage or re-finance because appraisers could no longer certify any market value. But I refused to stay silent. As a lawyer I stepped up, fought back, and was part of the litigation team that opposed Musqueam FN all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada, and we won. Today, after the Cowichan decision and the latest Musqueam FN deals with Ottawa and YVR, hundreds of thousands of British Columbians are angry and terrified: Can I renew my mortgage? Can I sell my home? Is my property even mine anymore? The NDP and Liberals keep saying “everything’s fine.” But it’s just not true. Your property rights are NOT safe under the current NDP-DRIPA chaos aided by the Federal Government. I know this is the truth because it’s already happened to me. With a new BC Conservative Government under my leadership, I will fight for your home and your property rights and I will stop the extremism. As Premier I will protect every BC family home and stop the handing off of our assets. Any deal that affects all British Columbians must be fair to all British Columbians. Vote for a Leader who knows what actions to take. Sign up for a Conservative Party of BC membership and join me in the fight. Watch this. Share if you want your home equity protected.

Kerry-Lynne Findlay

32,573 次观看 • 5 个月前

“Why Was This Bill Blocked?” BC NDP and Green Party MLAs have just unanimously voted to stop my DRIPA Repeal & Reset Bill from even reaching Second Reading. What does that mean? It means they refused to even look at the bill, refused to even hear what the public has been saying, and refused to even let the people of British Columbia understand what the bill actually contained. Let’s be clear about something, This bill wasn’t designed to divide anyone, It wasn’t written to attack Indigenous people, or erase rights, or inflame tensions, It was written for ONE purpose and that was to take DRIPA back to the drawing board with the people of British Columbia at the table. Instead, the governing parties in Victoria chose to shut the door. No debate. No discussion. No amendments. No listening. No democracy. So why block it? Because allowing this bill to move forward would have forced them to confront reality. British Columbians were never consulted on DRIPA. People across the province are more divided and confused than ever. Families are being treated differently because of ancestry. Aboriginal Title cases over fee-simple land are creating real fear. Municipalities and rural communities have no idea how DRIPA actually works. Polling shows a majority of voters do NOT support the current implementation. Instead of addressing those concerns, they shut down the conversation. What does this mean for the people of B.C.? It means the public has no voice, no referendum (at the moment), no say in how DRIPA is implemented, and no opportunity to demand clarity, fairness, or shared governance. The government will decide everything behind closed doors and ordinary British Columbians will be left dealing with the consequences. #bcpoli #cdnpoli

Jordan Kealy

38,214 次观看 • 9 个月前

The situation in British Columbia has reached a breaking point, and Question Period today laid it bare. I pressed Premier David Eby on the simple, unavoidable truth: under his government, major economic opportunities are slipping away, families are leaving in staggering numbers, and investors are looking south for stability they no longer find here. I pointed out what everyone can already see. Trade with the United States is rising, but our access to Asia is stagnating. Energy projects capable of delivering world-priced returns are being blocked. Seventy thousand people have left this province in the last year alone. And now Nutrien, one of the most significant resource players on the continent, has chosen to invest more than a billion dollars in Washington State rather than here in British Columbia. That decision didn’t happen by accident. Even Saskatchewan’s Premier has warned Eby about the dangerous rhetoric and divisive politics coming out of this government. Investors, premiers, and industry leaders across Canada are signaling the same thing: they don’t trust the direction British Columbia is heading. Yet instead of acknowledging any responsibility, Eby tried to dodge and deny. He disputed basic facts and insisted the province is in a period of “epic population growth,” a claim that would surprise the tens of thousands of British Columbians who’ve already left. And after admitting that Nutrien’s decision is “deeply disturbing,” he immediately shifted blame, claiming no one ever told him the project was in jeopardy. In my response, I made it clear that the conversations I’ve had with Saskatchewan tell a very different story. They’re deeply concerned about how impossible it has become to move major projects forward in this province. And Nutrien’s own stated reasons, congestion, bottlenecks, labour instability, reliability problems, and above all, uncertainty, point directly at this government’s policies. The Premier’s answer was to lecture the province on how to pronounce the company’s name and to repeat how many “major projects” he believes are on the books. But none of that changes the reality: when a global company wants to invest a billion dollars, they look for stable rules, predictable permitting, and governments that don’t rewrite the map every six months. They don’t find that in British Columbia anymore. What I made clear today is that this failure matters. It means lost jobs, lost investment, and lost confidence, consequences that British Columbians will bear long after this news cycle ends. The government had the tools to keep this opportunity in British Columbia. They used none of them. And until that changes, more of these opportunities will keep crossing the border. #cdnpoli #bcpoli

John Rustad

31,684 次观看 • 8 个月前

Yesterday, Aaron Gunn said something a lot of Canadians are thinking but too many politicians are afraid to say out loud. If governments claim to believe in private property rights, they should stop opening every public meeting by declaring the land Canadians live on isn’t really theirs. That’s the conversation people across this province are having right now. Today I was in the legislature because this isn’t theoretical anymore. Tara Armstrong introduced a simple bill with one basic principle: protect fee-simple private property rights in British Columbia. If you legally bought your home, your farm, or your land, the government should defend your ownership. And the government voted against it. Think about that. People spend their entire lives working to buy a home. They follow the rules. They pay their property taxes. Yet this government refused to stand up and say clearly that British Columbians have the right to own what they’ve worked for. Our land title system was built on a promise: if you own property, you actually own it. That promise matters to every homeowner, every family, and every person trying to build a future in this province. I’m running for leader because I’m not willing to sit back while that promise gets chipped away. Aaron raised the alarm yesterday. Today I’m telling you exactly where I stand. I will fight to defend the right of British Columbians to own their homes and their land. If you want leadership that will stand up for homeowners and defend the rights of the people who built this province, join us. Get a membership. Cast a vote. Let’s protect the homes and the future of British Columbia. Join me Let's rebuild B.C. together

Harman Bhangu

42,794 次观看 • 5 个月前

🦅🏡⚖️ : David Eby lied to everyone 11 days ago about the BC Supreme Court ruling on Cowichan land title claims against private property owners, in Richmond British Columbia. 🧐Watch the full brief video as there are several clips added to provide full context. In the last clip hereditary Chief of Lyackson, Huy’wu’qw Shana Thomas, makes it clear, she wants Aboriginal title to apply to all the properties in the same way the Crown had title, when the Crown sold the property to the current land owners. Giving Aboriginal title would nullify the current land owners title and force them to make an agreement with whichever tribe regains land title, through the courts. Remember folks, some properties have multiple land title claims against the property, from multiple 1st Nation tribes. The major question is, why has David Eby not resigned? How many times can a Premier lie to taxpayers on critical issues? David Eby knew for years he could inform private property owners who have a land title claim against their property and he chose to keep them out of the process. This was an intentional act, ensuring the BC Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Cowichan land title claim, Eby is now pretending to partially oppose. How can Eby, the Federal government or the City of Richmond be counted on to fight for land title rights for current property owners, when they all conspired to omit those very property owners, from the court case? 95% of British Columbia could be impacted by the precedence the Cowichan land title ruling presents in Richmond BC. The entire city of Kamloops has a land title claim against it. So it's impossible to ignore the devastating impact this could have on almost everyone in British Columbia who owns property or who has a mortgage / reverse mortgage on their property. This is especially true if lenders begin to refuse to provide loans to people who currently have loan agreements because the risks of lenders losing their loan investments, are too great.

Bruce McGonigal

40,507 次观看 • 9 个月前