Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

During trial 1, Bev allowed Dr. Frank Sheridan - A FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST, the same profession as Dr. Laposata, to testify about JOKs injuries being….. DOG. BITES. Bev Cannone HAS to see the writing on the wall for the CW. She’s been awful throughout, but denying Laposata is such an...

38,612 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Kay
Kayvor 1 Jahr

Another day, another blatant display of corruption. Beverly Cannone is a disgusting human.

Profilbild von Brandon Ehrhardt
Brandon Ehrhardtvor 1 Jahr

What a short game Beverly is playing. She’s playing a short game, this trial gets overturned on appeal. Imagine hiring a mob attorney with no morals, having a complicit judge in your background, and the CW still going Mark Sanchez on this thing

Profilbild von TexasAllianceforLife
TexasAllianceforLifevor 2 Jahren

When TAL Public Policy Analyst Deirdre Cooper's unborn child was diagnosed with Trisomy 18, she never questioned whether to move forward with the pregnancy & birth. As she says, life is always the compassionate answer, even for the hard cases. Hear her & Bosco's full story here.

Profilbild von ShelliMarie
ShelliMarievor 1 Jahr

@imnew_getoverit @FBIBoston @DMAnews1

Profilbild von Turgut Ocalan
Turgut Ocalanvor 1 Jahr

Wow, the dog bite angle is wild. @EthanMillerX2’s breakdowns on legal strategy have been so helpful—makes you see how weak the CW’s case really is. Bev’s denial of Laposata just adds to the mess.

Profilbild von Bostongrl1101
Bostongrl1101vor 1 Jahr

Laposata was more than qualified to testify! Pissed!

Profilbild von Kayla Rynor
Kayla Rynorvor 1 Jahr

I think Bev knows that Karen is going to be acquitted but she needs to save face with Morrissey. That’s giving her the benefit of the doubt. But there needs to be complete transparency when the jury forman and alternates are selected. We need to see the numbers!

Profilbild von s⚡️g
s⚡️gvor 1 Jahr

What’s terrifying is that Bev isn’t even trying to look impartial

Profilbild von D Mart
D Martvor 1 Jahr

The Feds were watching then. Perhaps this is one of the reasons why.

Profilbild von CWvKR 22117
CWvKR 22117vor 1 Jahr

@Justice4OJOKFKR Exactly. I had that same thought today. I don’t know why they don’t bring this out but likely Bev will say oh that was in trial one. Even though she seems more qualified for sure.

Profilbild von Tracey R.
Tracey R.vor 1 Jahr

I really wish they would call Garret Wing now.

Ähnliche Videos

ASKED. AND. ANSWERED. SIXTEEN TIMES. SIXTEEN is the number of times Hank Brennan badgered the witness—repeating the same question 16 times, despite Dr. Wolfe providing an answer the first time… and every subsequent time. What does the disgrace of a Judge do? She joins in with Brennan, badgering the witness yet another time, because apparently the first fifteen weren’t enough. A competent Judge is supposed to shut down such conduct when it occurs the first time, but most certainly upon the first “asked and answered” objection by opposing counsel. ———— HOW IT WENT DOWN: *This is after a solid 5+ minutes of Hank badgering Dr. Wolfe with this same question.* Alan Jackson: “Objection! This is 5 times your Honor.” Judge Bev: “And this time we’ll get an answer and that’ll be it.” AJ: “We got an answer every single time!” Judge Bev: “Can you answer that Dr. Wolfe?” Dr. Wolfe: “I feel like I’ve answered it the best I can, your Honor.” Judge Bev: “Ok, next question.” Hank Brennan: “You don’t like that question?” AJ: “Objection!” Judge Bev: “Sustained.” AJ: “Move to strike.” Judge Bev: “Strike! Jurors, disregard that!” ———— And this time we’ll get an answer???? Are you serious Judge Cannone? What is wrong with you? Can you imagine if the defense tried pulling this? Oh no—you can’t, because Lifeguard Bev interjects herself and hijacks the defense attorney’s questions, putting a stop to them after the first ask! #DanielWolfe #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

142,457 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr