Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Dylan Patel on Anthropic: "I think by Q3 they may even be profitable including SBC. Their margins on Opus 4.8 token is north of 80% for API price. They have a lot of deals where their total corporate gross margin gets clawed down a little bit because of how...

pequityresearch's profile picture

P Equity Research 📰

37,671 subscribers

73,740 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Dylan Patel Dylan Patel of SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's margin on an Opus 4.8 API token is north of 80%. It is net-income profitable excluding stock comp in Q2 2026, potentially profitable including it by Q3. Here is why that matters. At 80%-plus, even doubling compute costs leaves Anthropic above 50% gross margin. Every GPU it rents, at any above-market rate, is immediately accretive. It can outbid the whole market for scarce compute and still print money. Lower-margin labs cannot. The compute crunch is an Anthropic tailwind, via Sequoia Capital: Source: Sequoia Capital -
3:08

Dylan Patel Dylan Patel of SemiAnalysis: Anthropic's margin on an Opus 4.8 API token is north of 80%. It is net-income profitable excluding stock comp in Q2 2026, potentially profitable including it by Q3. Here is why that matters. At 80%-plus, even doubling compute costs leaves Anthropic above 50% gross margin. Every GPU it rents, at any above-market rate, is immediately accretive. It can outbid the whole market for scarce compute and still print money. Lower-margin labs cannot. The compute crunch is an Anthropic tailwind, via Sequoia Capital: Source: Sequoia Capital -

Podcast Alpha

100,167 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gavin on why it's a mistake for SaaS companies to resist AI because it has a lower margin structure: "When there's a transformative new technology customers are demanding, it's always a mistake not to embrace it. If you're trying to preserve an 80% gross-margin structure, you are guaranteed not to succeed in AI. SaaS companies are making the exact same mistake that brick and mortar retailers did with e-commerce. They clearly saw customer demand, but they didn't like the margin structure. Now Amazon has higher margins -- margins can change. SaaS companies have their 70-90% gross margins and are reluctant to accept AI gross margins -- a good AI company might have 40%. If you want to have an agent, it's never going to succeed if you're not willing to run it at a sub-35% gross margin because that's what the AI natives are running it at. I can't think of a single application SaaS company that could not be running a successful agent strategy. And they have a giant advantage over these AI natives in that they have a cash-generative business."
2:55

Gavin on why it's a mistake for SaaS companies to resist AI because it has a lower margin structure: "When there's a transformative new technology customers are demanding, it's always a mistake not to embrace it. If you're trying to preserve an 80% gross-margin structure, you are guaranteed not to succeed in AI. SaaS companies are making the exact same mistake that brick and mortar retailers did with e-commerce. They clearly saw customer demand, but they didn't like the margin structure. Now Amazon has higher margins -- margins can change. SaaS companies have their 70-90% gross margins and are reluctant to accept AI gross margins -- a good AI company might have 40%. If you want to have an agent, it's never going to succeed if you're not willing to run it at a sub-35% gross margin because that's what the AI natives are running it at. I can't think of a single application SaaS company that could not be running a successful agent strategy. And they have a giant advantage over these AI natives in that they have a cash-generative business."

Patrick OShaughnessy

84,041 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Dylan on why Anthropic leading on models doesn't mean OpenAI loses. Even the tier 2 and 3 labs will sell out of tokens: "Everyone's like Anthropic won. They had Mythos, Opus 4.7 and their revenue is adding $10 billion a month all before OpenAI's alleged Spud release. So clearly Anthropic is in the lead and OpenAI is cooked. Anthropic has such bounds on compute, they can only grow it so fast. Dario used to gloat about how OpenAI was being too aggressive on compute and Anthropic was more sensible in their scaling. Now Anthropic is like I wish we had a lot more compute. OpenAI just raised a ton of money to get incremental compute in addition to the irresponsible levels of compute that they were buying. By the end of the year, let's say a 4.6 Opus tier model, the economy would spend $100 billion on. Anthropic won't have enough compute to do that. And presumably OpenAI and Google will hit that tier soon. Anthropic may get to charge 70%+ gross margins but if OpenAI hits it next, they charge 50% gross margins. They still get all of this incremental demand. There is such demand for these tokens and such limitations on compute. It's pretty clear even the tier 2 or tier 3 lab are going to be sold out of tokens. The economic value that the best model can deliver is growing faster than our ability to actually serve those tokens to people via the infrastructure."
2:33

Dylan on why Anthropic leading on models doesn't mean OpenAI loses. Even the tier 2 and 3 labs will sell out of tokens: "Everyone's like Anthropic won. They had Mythos, Opus 4.7 and their revenue is adding $10 billion a month all before OpenAI's alleged Spud release. So clearly Anthropic is in the lead and OpenAI is cooked. Anthropic has such bounds on compute, they can only grow it so fast. Dario used to gloat about how OpenAI was being too aggressive on compute and Anthropic was more sensible in their scaling. Now Anthropic is like I wish we had a lot more compute. OpenAI just raised a ton of money to get incremental compute in addition to the irresponsible levels of compute that they were buying. By the end of the year, let's say a 4.6 Opus tier model, the economy would spend $100 billion on. Anthropic won't have enough compute to do that. And presumably OpenAI and Google will hit that tier soon. Anthropic may get to charge 70%+ gross margins but if OpenAI hits it next, they charge 50% gross margins. They still get all of this incremental demand. There is such demand for these tokens and such limitations on compute. It's pretty clear even the tier 2 or tier 3 lab are going to be sold out of tokens. The economic value that the best model can deliver is growing faster than our ability to actually serve those tokens to people via the infrastructure."

Patrick OShaughnessy

295,307 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Sequoia Capital GP Sonya Huang 🐥 is seeing Jevons Paradox all over the place from her perch at the firm "Not to be an annoying VC, but Jevons Paradox is a freaking wonderful thing." "Because what's happening is — I see the data on all this stuff. Our companies, we see the gross margins going up. At the same time as AI usage is going way up, their gross margins are also going up. Because they are the beneficiaries of intelligence getting cheaper and cheaper to meter." "On the other hand — and I see this from the model companies we work with — their cohorts are getting better and better and better." "So it's not like they're facing price competition, and their businesses are going into the gutter. They have phenomenal businesses, where because they're able to provide intelligence at increasingly cheap prices, their businesses actually get better and better." "So I actually think this is an 'everybody wins' situation."
1:15

Sequoia Capital GP Sonya Huang 🐥 is seeing Jevons Paradox all over the place from her perch at the firm "Not to be an annoying VC, but Jevons Paradox is a freaking wonderful thing." "Because what's happening is — I see the data on all this stuff. Our companies, we see the gross margins going up. At the same time as AI usage is going way up, their gross margins are also going up. Because they are the beneficiaries of intelligence getting cheaper and cheaper to meter." "On the other hand — and I see this from the model companies we work with — their cohorts are getting better and better and better." "So it's not like they're facing price competition, and their businesses are going into the gutter. They have phenomenal businesses, where because they're able to provide intelligence at increasingly cheap prices, their businesses actually get better and better." "So I actually think this is an 'everybody wins' situation."

TBPN

111,055 просмотров • 8 дней назад

I have a hard time believing that Mamdani has magically figured out how to sell groceries 30% cheaper than every other market in America. The average grocery store only makes about 2 cents of profit on the dollar. Even if they make NO profit, Mamdani's stores still need to cut 28% more off the cost. Sure, they won't have to pay rent or taxes, but they also can't buy in bulk (there's only 5 of them), won't sell high-margin products like hot food or beer, and will probably pay their workers well above the market rate. You can't cut 30% off the price of groceries with that strategy and expect to be profitable. That's just simple math. New Yorkers won't be getting cheaper food. They will just be buying groceries with your tax dollars and calling it a store.
7:27

I have a hard time believing that Mamdani has magically figured out how to sell groceries 30% cheaper than every other market in America. The average grocery store only makes about 2 cents of profit on the dollar. Even if they make NO profit, Mamdani's stores still need to cut 28% more off the cost. Sure, they won't have to pay rent or taxes, but they also can't buy in bulk (there's only 5 of them), won't sell high-margin products like hot food or beer, and will probably pay their workers well above the market rate. You can't cut 30% off the price of groceries with that strategy and expect to be profitable. That's just simple math. New Yorkers won't be getting cheaper food. They will just be buying groceries with your tax dollars and calling it a store.

Glenn Beck

149,491 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Dylan Patel says memory gross margins are headed to 90% and then at some point will head back down to the 70s or even lower. "Memory companies, they're in a commodity market." "They let the spot market and contract market sort of supply-demand balance really adjust pricing." "And so you see these two, three axes in pricing, and someday you'll see pricing halve." "Because memory necessarily doesn't deserve a margin of 85%, which is where it's headed to. We're still not at 85, 90% gross margins for memory, but we'll get there." "And then at some point from there, it'll also halve back down to like 70s or maybe even lower. And so we'll see this oscillation in memory."
0:29

Dylan Patel says memory gross margins are headed to 90% and then at some point will head back down to the 70s or even lower. "Memory companies, they're in a commodity market." "They let the spot market and contract market sort of supply-demand balance really adjust pricing." "And so you see these two, three axes in pricing, and someday you'll see pricing halve." "Because memory necessarily doesn't deserve a margin of 85%, which is where it's headed to. We're still not at 85, 90% gross margins for memory, but we'll get there." "And then at some point from there, it'll also halve back down to like 70s or maybe even lower. And so we'll see this oscillation in memory."

Fireside Alpha

17,338 просмотров • 16 дней назад

I’m writing this while I’m still in it. Still stressed. Still exhausted. Still after crying. And I’m still working through the night. I need people to understand what this really looks like. The posts you see do not come from some calm, quiet, comfortable life. They are written in the middle of pressure, fatigue, sickness, grief, and responsibility. I take a photo, I write my story, and I post it. Then I keep working. Because I have to. Because my guys need me. Because I cannot give up. Because if I stop, the consequences are real. Every single day, I make the choice to stay here. And yes, sometimes that choice hurts. I am human. I know I could go home. I know there is a beautiful life waiting for me somewhere else. I know what I am missing. I know what rest could look like. I know what peace could feel like. But I stay. I stay because my boys cannot simply go home. I stay because they do not have the freedoms I have as a foreigner under contract. I stay because love is not a feeling here. Love is duty. Love is sacrifice. Love is showing up again and again, even when you are breaking. Right now, I am doing the work of five or six people in this brigade. Not because I have endless strength. Not because I never fall apart. Not because I am some kind of machine. I do it because I care that much. I do it because I am passionate, because I believe in #Ukraine I am a soldier. Not a volunteer. This is not something I step in and out of when it is convenient or I have the energy. This is my duty. 24/7. I save my vacation because when I finally leave for a little while, I do not want a getaway. I do not want a trip. I do not want sightseeing. I do not want Kyiv. I do not want the Carpathians. I want to go home to #Canada. And until the day I can do that, I work. Every post. Every video. Every message. Every fundraiser. I am on duty. Every four to six weeks, I scrape together a few hours to take care of myself and try to remember what normal feels like. But the truth is that I am tired. And some of what I do might look small from the outside. It might look ordinary. It might even look stupid. It is not. Because if I do not do these things, people will die. And yes, they may die anyway. This is war. There are no guarantees here. There are no perfect endings. There is only the fight to give them a better chance, one more chance, any chance at all. YOU give them that fighting chance. And that is why I am asking you, from the deepest and most exhausted part of me, to help. I cannot do this alone. I am one person doing the work of five or six people. But with you, I am not alone. With you, thousands of hands help carry this weight. With you, this burden becomes survivable. With you, these men have more than hope, they have support, action, and a chance to make it through. Please do not scroll past this. Please do not assume someone else will step in. Please do not underestimate how much this matters. #Support93
5:57

I’m writing this while I’m still in it. Still stressed. Still exhausted. Still after crying. And I’m still working through the night. I need people to understand what this really looks like. The posts you see do not come from some calm, quiet, comfortable life. They are written in the middle of pressure, fatigue, sickness, grief, and responsibility. I take a photo, I write my story, and I post it. Then I keep working. Because I have to. Because my guys need me. Because I cannot give up. Because if I stop, the consequences are real. Every single day, I make the choice to stay here. And yes, sometimes that choice hurts. I am human. I know I could go home. I know there is a beautiful life waiting for me somewhere else. I know what I am missing. I know what rest could look like. I know what peace could feel like. But I stay. I stay because my boys cannot simply go home. I stay because they do not have the freedoms I have as a foreigner under contract. I stay because love is not a feeling here. Love is duty. Love is sacrifice. Love is showing up again and again, even when you are breaking. Right now, I am doing the work of five or six people in this brigade. Not because I have endless strength. Not because I never fall apart. Not because I am some kind of machine. I do it because I care that much. I do it because I am passionate, because I believe in #Ukraine I am a soldier. Not a volunteer. This is not something I step in and out of when it is convenient or I have the energy. This is my duty. 24/7. I save my vacation because when I finally leave for a little while, I do not want a getaway. I do not want a trip. I do not want sightseeing. I do not want Kyiv. I do not want the Carpathians. I want to go home to #Canada. And until the day I can do that, I work. Every post. Every video. Every message. Every fundraiser. I am on duty. Every four to six weeks, I scrape together a few hours to take care of myself and try to remember what normal feels like. But the truth is that I am tired. And some of what I do might look small from the outside. It might look ordinary. It might even look stupid. It is not. Because if I do not do these things, people will die. And yes, they may die anyway. This is war. There are no guarantees here. There are no perfect endings. There is only the fight to give them a better chance, one more chance, any chance at all. YOU give them that fighting chance. And that is why I am asking you, from the deepest and most exhausted part of me, to help. I cannot do this alone. I am one person doing the work of five or six people. But with you, I am not alone. With you, thousands of hands help carry this weight. With you, this burden becomes survivable. With you, these men have more than hope, they have support, action, and a chance to make it through. Please do not scroll past this. Please do not assume someone else will step in. Please do not underestimate how much this matters. #Support93

April Huggett

12,218 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

.Dylan Patel thinks Anthropic will get to 5–6 GW by year end. But at a far higher cost than it would have had to pay if it had gone crazy on compute commitments early like OpenAI did. Ant will get the compute either through cloud partners like Bedrock and Vertex who take ~50% gross margin on revenue, or shorter-term deals where rates have climbed well above what long-term contracts locked in a year or two ago cost. They’ll probably also have to destroy demand by pushing up model prices.
2:16

.Dylan Patel thinks Anthropic will get to 5–6 GW by year end. But at a far higher cost than it would have had to pay if it had gone crazy on compute commitments early like OpenAI did. Ant will get the compute either through cloud partners like Bedrock and Vertex who take ~50% gross margin on revenue, or shorter-term deals where rates have climbed well above what long-term contracts locked in a year or two ago cost. They’ll probably also have to destroy demand by pushing up model prices.

Dwarkesh Patel

55,447 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

In every opportunity, every circumstance, you have a choice. Am I going to back down or am I going to do something about it? I have a choice and I’m going to be my best self on every single play-George Kittle Winners choose to give everything they have so their team can be successful.
0:26

In every opportunity, every circumstance, you have a choice. Am I going to back down or am I going to do something about it? I have a choice and I’m going to be my best self on every single play-George Kittle Winners choose to give everything they have so their team can be successful.

The Winning Difference

103,906 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Reporter: A number of Republicans are calling on you to apologize for that Obama post. Is that something you’re going to do? Trump: No, I didn’t make a mistake. I look at thousands of things. I looked at the beginning of it. It was fine. I guess it was a takeoff on the Lion King. A lot of people were covered. If they would have looked, they would have seen it and probably they would have had the sense to take it down.
0:54

Reporter: A number of Republicans are calling on you to apologize for that Obama post. Is that something you’re going to do? Trump: No, I didn’t make a mistake. I look at thousands of things. I looked at the beginning of it. It was fine. I guess it was a takeoff on the Lion King. A lot of people were covered. If they would have looked, they would have seen it and probably they would have had the sense to take it down.

Clash Report

47,898 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

My kids can be finicky when it comes to food, but my problem is with me. I don’t want them to be without so what ends up happening is if they like something, I will stock up on it. This is why I have two mega boxes of slim Jims in my pantry, this is why I have 4 Costco size boxes of Welch’s fruit snacks and so on. I have yet to find a healthy compromise when it comes to keeping a decent amount of the foods they like in stock. They change their mind too much and when they stop eating it the food expires so I have to throw it away. Almost like clockwork right after I threw it away, they ask for it again. I definitely know how it feels to try to make sure the kids have things they want to eat but with them changing their minds so much, that makes it quite challenging and I really don’t have a viable solution except to run to the store every time they want something. What do you do in this situation? I am willing to try anything at this point to avoid the waste of food and money.
2:33

My kids can be finicky when it comes to food, but my problem is with me. I don’t want them to be without so what ends up happening is if they like something, I will stock up on it. This is why I have two mega boxes of slim Jims in my pantry, this is why I have 4 Costco size boxes of Welch’s fruit snacks and so on. I have yet to find a healthy compromise when it comes to keeping a decent amount of the foods they like in stock. They change their mind too much and when they stop eating it the food expires so I have to throw it away. Almost like clockwork right after I threw it away, they ask for it again. I definitely know how it feels to try to make sure the kids have things they want to eat but with them changing their minds so much, that makes it quite challenging and I really don’t have a viable solution except to run to the store every time they want something. What do you do in this situation? I am willing to try anything at this point to avoid the waste of food and money.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

30,215 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I tried to tell y’all how it works when I’m on the beach or in a tourists trap. I see these guys walking around with icy drinks and since everything else in the country was cheaper than they are here I would assume his drinks would be too. These guys will come by and even take your “order” if I don’t see something I want, he will say he can make it for me. These women fell for this and ordered 3 drinks from him. One of the ladies was so thirsty she immediately started drinking it until he told them they owed him $75. Mind you these are adult drinks, the cups look to be a decent size so is it worth it or are they just tripping out? I am on the fence with this one, if it’s clean and good quality, I may say this is a fair price but the only one I’m questioning is the one who tried to give it back after she already drank out of it. Rarely will I side with a street merchant because I feel like they’ve ripped me off quite a few times. But I think his price is valid for this. I’ve paid close to the same price for much less when I was at the beach. Most of the time I can tell they are well drinks that they tell me are too shelf. Many people can’t tell the difference but I can. I only drink certain brands and I am very used to what they taste like. This kind of interaction is why I now only buy from restaurants and bars like I mentioned before. I am not going to get into an argument with someone over something I ordered but failed to check the price first. That old saying, “if you have to ask them you can’t afford it.” That doesn’t apply here because if I have to ask then it means they should have listed the price up front.
1:51

I tried to tell y’all how it works when I’m on the beach or in a tourists trap. I see these guys walking around with icy drinks and since everything else in the country was cheaper than they are here I would assume his drinks would be too. These guys will come by and even take your “order” if I don’t see something I want, he will say he can make it for me. These women fell for this and ordered 3 drinks from him. One of the ladies was so thirsty she immediately started drinking it until he told them they owed him $75. Mind you these are adult drinks, the cups look to be a decent size so is it worth it or are they just tripping out? I am on the fence with this one, if it’s clean and good quality, I may say this is a fair price but the only one I’m questioning is the one who tried to give it back after she already drank out of it. Rarely will I side with a street merchant because I feel like they’ve ripped me off quite a few times. But I think his price is valid for this. I’ve paid close to the same price for much less when I was at the beach. Most of the time I can tell they are well drinks that they tell me are too shelf. Many people can’t tell the difference but I can. I only drink certain brands and I am very used to what they taste like. This kind of interaction is why I now only buy from restaurants and bars like I mentioned before. I am not going to get into an argument with someone over something I ordered but failed to check the price first. That old saying, “if you have to ask them you can’t afford it.” That doesn’t apply here because if I have to ask then it means they should have listed the price up front.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

289,573 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. I think that’s part of it and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up for in the 4th quarter and be into it and given them more wins; I think we would have looked at it a little differently. I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that; but I mean the fans have been there. They were up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive. I just want to move forward and just wanna try to continue to give them things to be positive for and show up and be happy that they support us. I’m just happy they show up for us.” Cooper Flagg speaks on the Mavericks fan base and the support he felt tonight in the AAC.
0:44

“I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. I think that’s part of it and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up for in the 4th quarter and be into it and given them more wins; I think we would have looked at it a little differently. I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that; but I mean the fans have been there. They were up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive. I just want to move forward and just wanna try to continue to give them things to be positive for and show up and be happy that they support us. I’m just happy they show up for us.” Cooper Flagg speaks on the Mavericks fan base and the support he felt tonight in the AAC.

Abby Jones

244,669 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”
0:52

Cooper Flagg on the fan energy now compared to earlier in the season: “I think we have not given the fans a lot to love. So I think that it’s part of it, and I think we take a lot of responsibility on that and having lost the fans a little bit. And I think had we given them a lot more to cheer for and be up in the fourth quarters and be into it and giving them more wins, I think we might look at it a little differently, so, I think we can take a lot of responsibility for that, but the fans have been there, they stepped up tonight. They were huge, they were loud, they were positive, so I just want to look forward and try to continue to give them things to be positive for…I’m just glad they show up for us.”

Noah Weber

67,240 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Ben Thompson says Nvidia has already cut prices, they just show up as backstops and neocloud equity instead of margins "They're actually not maintaining their margins, because who is buying?" "This whole question of circular financing, people talk about Lucent and things like that. This whole deal and Nvidia's providing 25% backstop." "But if you actually ascribe a value to Nvidia's taking equity in the Neoclouds or whatever, they guarantee they're going to buy all their compute to 2030. And why do they do that? So that the entity in question can get a lower cost of capital, so they can buy more GPUs." "But implicit in that, why do they get a lower cost of capital? They get a lower cost of capital because Nvidia assumed risk." "This is my point before. Risk never disappears. It just appears somewhere else. Taking on risk has a price." "Now there is a world where AI takes off, it never stops, and everything is fine, and Nvidia captured all the upside of their risk." "But there's also a world where, say, this Neocloud they backed, a ton of compute comes to market, the hyperscalers have plenty of compute, they don't have enough demand, Nvidia is paying for a computer that no one wants. They just lost a bunch of money." "So if you think about it, there's an expected value of that investment. It's not zero. It's not 100%. It's somewhere in the middle." "But that is a diminution of Nvidia's profitability. If you actually look at their business holistically, what that is is a price cut."
1:31

Ben Thompson says Nvidia has already cut prices, they just show up as backstops and neocloud equity instead of margins "They're actually not maintaining their margins, because who is buying?" "This whole question of circular financing, people talk about Lucent and things like that. This whole deal and Nvidia's providing 25% backstop." "But if you actually ascribe a value to Nvidia's taking equity in the Neoclouds or whatever, they guarantee they're going to buy all their compute to 2030. And why do they do that? So that the entity in question can get a lower cost of capital, so they can buy more GPUs." "But implicit in that, why do they get a lower cost of capital? They get a lower cost of capital because Nvidia assumed risk." "This is my point before. Risk never disappears. It just appears somewhere else. Taking on risk has a price." "Now there is a world where AI takes off, it never stops, and everything is fine, and Nvidia captured all the upside of their risk." "But there's also a world where, say, this Neocloud they backed, a ton of compute comes to market, the hyperscalers have plenty of compute, they don't have enough demand, Nvidia is paying for a computer that no one wants. They just lost a bunch of money." "So if you think about it, there's an expected value of that investment. It's not zero. It's not 100%. It's somewhere in the middle." "But that is a diminution of Nvidia's profitability. If you actually look at their business holistically, what that is is a price cut."

Fireside Alpha

56,613 просмотров • 3 дней назад

This is what it is like. I wanted so much to sleep but then came the call. I have 4 of my soldiers going to war and they are with 10 other soldiers from my Brigade. So instead of resting I am making packages for them. I am the store at midnight in Donetsk Oblast. This is possible because of all of you donating and sharing my fundraiser. Because of Dylan C and his family and readers. I am ever grateful to each and every one of you for everything you do for us here. #Support93 #SupportUkraine
2:22

This is what it is like. I wanted so much to sleep but then came the call. I have 4 of my soldiers going to war and they are with 10 other soldiers from my Brigade. So instead of resting I am making packages for them. I am the store at midnight in Donetsk Oblast. This is possible because of all of you donating and sharing my fundraiser. Because of Dylan C and his family and readers. I am ever grateful to each and every one of you for everything you do for us here. #Support93 #SupportUkraine

April Huggett

12,058 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Sooyoung: i heard from the director and staff, they said those who used to be on stage is different.. they said we prepared differently! To be honest, when I first heard it i kind of disliked it, because i also feel comfortable and free at the site… at that moment ì focus on what i would do on a scene because i really like doing that.. i have lived a life where i always had to prepare for something, so i will always looking at my script, thinking how should i move during a scene, of course the others actors did this too, so we continue to prepare like this! (how idol turned actress/actors had this compulsion where they had to prepare perfectly)
0:47

Sooyoung: i heard from the director and staff, they said those who used to be on stage is different.. they said we prepared differently! To be honest, when I first heard it i kind of disliked it, because i also feel comfortable and free at the site… at that moment ì focus on what i would do on a scene because i really like doing that.. i have lived a life where i always had to prepare for something, so i will always looking at my script, thinking how should i move during a scene, of course the others actors did this too, so we continue to prepare like this! (how idol turned actress/actors had this compulsion where they had to prepare perfectly)

for Sooyoung Choi

24,449 просмотров • 2 лет назад

#WATCH | On announcing a 90-day pause on new tariffs and raising China tariffs to 125%, US President Donald Trump says, "Well, I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line. No other president would have done what I did. Somebody had to do it...They had to stop because it was not sustainable. I'm honoured to have done it. Somebody had to do what we did. I did a 90-day pause for the people who didn't retaliate because I told them if they retaliate, we're going to double it. And that's what I did with China because they did retaliate. So we'll see how it all works out. I think it's going to work out amazing. I think that our country is going to be at the end of a year or shorter, but I think we're going to have something that nobody would have dreamt possible. I am very happy that I have done it..." (Source - US Network Pool via Reuters)
2:42

#WATCH | On announcing a 90-day pause on new tariffs and raising China tariffs to 125%, US President Donald Trump says, "Well, I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line. No other president would have done what I did. Somebody had to do it...They had to stop because it was not sustainable. I'm honoured to have done it. Somebody had to do what we did. I did a 90-day pause for the people who didn't retaliate because I told them if they retaliate, we're going to double it. And that's what I did with China because they did retaliate. So we'll see how it all works out. I think it's going to work out amazing. I think that our country is going to be at the end of a year or shorter, but I think we're going to have something that nobody would have dreamt possible. I am very happy that I have done it..." (Source - US Network Pool via Reuters)

ANI

233,475 просмотров • 1 год назад

Krzysztof Kieślowski on why he feels it is immoral to spend a lot of money to make movies: "I don't believe in absolute freedom. In practice it is impossible, philosophically unacceptable. We direct ourselves to get freedom and every time we realize we can't reach it. And, looking at it in this way, the goal is not as important as the means of attaining it: it is not possible- thank God!- to achieve our goal. So it is obvious that I am favourably disposed to compromise. And not because it is useful. First of all, because I don't know the answers, and in making films I ask questions. Questions and doubts, lack of self-confidence, curiosity and amazement that everything goes on in a natural way- all this puts me in the position of an observer and a listener. I change my script very often- the scenes, dialogues or situations- because I can see that people around me have better ideas, more intelligent solutions. It doesn't disturb me that these are other people's ideas. When I have accepted and chosen them, they become mine. As a film director I am realistic. I am using the world of events and the world of thoughts, and I treat them equally. I am also realistic in my approach to the work. I respect my producer, money and, above all, my viewer. Not just because I have to. I do so because I want to. In my opinion, the production of a film- however costly- has its own morality. And I am trying to obey this morality, because I want to obey. A cup of coffee may cost 1½ dollars, may cost 3 or 5 dollars, but when it costs 120 dollars, drinking this coffee is immoral. It is exactly the same in the production of films. The film I want to make is the film I am able to make. There are no others. I don't think of other films. I don't have a million viewers waiting at the entrance of the cinema, but I need to feel that someone needs me for something. And even if I make films- like all my colleagues- for myself, I'm looking all the time for somebody who tells me, like a fifteen-year-old girl in France, 'I saw your 'Double Life of Veronique' (1991) Then I want to see it several more times. For the first time in my life I have seen and I have felt that there is something like 'soul'. So, if I were not concerned about this girl's opinion, there would be no reason to take the camera out of its box." ('Projections A forum for Filmmakers', edited by John Boorman and Walter Donohue)
1:25

Krzysztof Kieślowski on why he feels it is immoral to spend a lot of money to make movies: "I don't believe in absolute freedom. In practice it is impossible, philosophically unacceptable. We direct ourselves to get freedom and every time we realize we can't reach it. And, looking at it in this way, the goal is not as important as the means of attaining it: it is not possible- thank God!- to achieve our goal. So it is obvious that I am favourably disposed to compromise. And not because it is useful. First of all, because I don't know the answers, and in making films I ask questions. Questions and doubts, lack of self-confidence, curiosity and amazement that everything goes on in a natural way- all this puts me in the position of an observer and a listener. I change my script very often- the scenes, dialogues or situations- because I can see that people around me have better ideas, more intelligent solutions. It doesn't disturb me that these are other people's ideas. When I have accepted and chosen them, they become mine. As a film director I am realistic. I am using the world of events and the world of thoughts, and I treat them equally. I am also realistic in my approach to the work. I respect my producer, money and, above all, my viewer. Not just because I have to. I do so because I want to. In my opinion, the production of a film- however costly- has its own morality. And I am trying to obey this morality, because I want to obey. A cup of coffee may cost 1½ dollars, may cost 3 or 5 dollars, but when it costs 120 dollars, drinking this coffee is immoral. It is exactly the same in the production of films. The film I want to make is the film I am able to make. There are no others. I don't think of other films. I don't have a million viewers waiting at the entrance of the cinema, but I need to feel that someone needs me for something. And even if I make films- like all my colleagues- for myself, I'm looking all the time for somebody who tells me, like a fifteen-year-old girl in France, 'I saw your 'Double Life of Veronique' (1991) Then I want to see it several more times. For the first time in my life I have seen and I have felt that there is something like 'soul'. So, if I were not concerned about this girl's opinion, there would be no reason to take the camera out of its box." ('Projections A forum for Filmmakers', edited by John Boorman and Walter Donohue)

DepressedBergman

63,389 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад