Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
🥚Egg 3: Office Elevator🥚 #妊婦 #ボテ腹 #断面図 #産卵 I'm trying to learn some basic facial animation
Комментарии: 0
Нет доступных комментариев
Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста
![Marc Andreessen: "I'm reading every spare minute that I have" Expanding on his information diet, the a16z cofounder says AirPods have been the single biggest technological leap: "They're the unlock for me for audiobooks, podcasts, and interviews. I'm doing audio content probably 2-3 hours per day -- getting up in the morning, going to bed at night, all the drive time . . . If nothing else is going on, I'm always listening to something." Text-to-speech has also been an unlock with apps like Substack, NaturalReader, and Apple's audiobooks -- "It sounds spectacular," Marc says, "[AI voice technology] is really starting to work." Marc uses podcasts and YouTube interviews to go down rabbit holes on topics, but otherwise he's trying to get back to audiobooks: "I try to get back to audiobooks as much as possible, and the reason is audiobooks are my opportunity to really learn a new area that I probably don't know anything about. And so if I can scrape aside 10-20 hours of audio time for a period of history or something like that, I can really go deep on it." Marc generally tries to barbell his information intake: "It's either stuff that's super current or it's stuff that's timeless. I'm basically trying to not read anything that's from yesterday through like 10 years ago. I'm trying to be super current, and the form of being super current is talking to people who are currently experts or it's Twitter. Then for timeless, that's almost all books, but I kind of go back and forth between these modes." He continues: "I'm either listening to a book that's usually on history or a biography or something like that or some new domain that I'm trying to learn. Or I'm up to the minute on what's happening in AI today." source: David Perell (2023)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2009015061667274805/amplify_video_thumb/2009012384040353792/img/_EnR6wquYNmI1ZUd.jpg)
![Max Blumenthal: "Netanyahu sees...he's losing his last base, and all he's left with is... influencers who are... Jewish Zionists... [like] Ben Shapiro, whose Daily Wire company has been collapsing... [and] Mark Levin [who's] an artificial construction of the Murdoch family." This clip of Blumenthal (Max Blumenthal), founder and editor-in-chief of The Grayzone, is taken from an interview with Nima R. Alkhorshid posted to the Dialogue Works (Dialogue works) YouTube channel on September 20, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "Netanyahu's only base among the American public is exclusively within the Bible Belt among Christian evangelicals who voted for Trump. But they themselves are moving away. And they're starting through the interventions of Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene, to learn that there are Christians in Palestine, that there is the Saint Porphyrius Church in Gaza City, which has been under attack, which has existed there since the 8th century, and this has been transformative for them. "So Netanyahu sees that he's losing his last base, and all he's left with is the 1%, the influencers who are just Jewish Zionists, who have no. Who have no ability to re. Who are losing their own ability to communicate with the conservative grassroots. I'm talking about Ben Shapiro, whose Daily Wire company has been collapsing. They canceled their credit cards last year. They're, like, ending their office space. They're leaving their office space in Nashville. "Mark Levin at Fox News, he's just an artificial construction of the Murdoch family. He doesn't have an actual base. These are Netanyahu's voices in the US and then he has his billionaires, the Bill Ackmans, the Ron Lauders. And so what they're trying to do is they're trying to take TPUSA, which Charlie Kirk controlled. "And what they've been trying to do for years, is take this, which is a political empire that has an annual budget that's larger than the municipal budget of many small American cities, and use it as a host body for their agenda to prevent the conservative grassroots exodus from Israel's, you know, to prevent the conservative grassroots from turning on Zionism. "And then all of a sudden, Charlie Kirk realizes his own grassroots base that he commands at TPUSA is in full revolt. They're disgusted by the genocide. Some of them are disgusted by the genocide in Gaza. But what really upsets them the most is they start to see that their own government is under the control of a foreign entity and that Netanyahu seems to even control Donald Trump."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1969633925762073082/amplify_video_thumb/1969631317651570693/img/VgS3W_yTNVXkfuqZ.jpg)
!["Before 1930, we knew that parasites could cause cancer [in animals]... [And] we knew that it didn't seem to cause cancer unless the animal was vaccinated. And we knew that it didn't seem to cause cancer unless [it] lived in a high-carbohydrate diet system." Dr. Lee Merritt, an orthopedic surgeon who did her residency in the United States Navy and served for over 10 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, describes for Meri Crouley (Meri Crouley) some of the evidence that points to the possibility that some cancers are caused by parasites. Merritt, an outspoken critic of the COVID injections, notes that parasites alone don't seem to cause cancer—rather, a confluence of "vaccination," a high-carbohydrate diet, and exposure to parasites works to cause cancer. In this clip, Merritt hones in on the late clinical pathologist Johannes Fibiger, who won the Nobel Prize in 1926 for the discovery that nematodes cause stomach cancer in rats. "[Fibiger] looked at these stomach cancers in animals and he said... 'Man, those look like parasite egg sacs.' And then he sliced them open and he saw nematodes. He said, 'They are parasite egg sacs.'" Considering the mass "vaccination" campaign in the U.S. coupled with our society's high-carb diet (think of the poisonous food pyramid), Merritt concludes that there is a malicious attempt to propagate cancers among Americans. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Here's where the proof comes, okay? Johannes Fibiger was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1926, actually took the prize in '27. And what did he do? He basically took. He took these rats. He, he got. In those days, he didn't have a veterinary office in the university, so you had to hire rat catchers, which I think is kind of funny the way it worked out. "But he hired these rat catchers to go get him a specific type of rat. And so he only used one genus and species of rat. And what he did is he fed them these nematode parasites, a little different parasite than the Japanese. But I'm sure he'd been reviewing those studies because, like them, he looked at cancer. He looked at these stomach cancers in animals and he said, that. And in humans, I think, because he was a. He was a clinical pathologist at the University of Copenhagen. He. He looked at him, he says, man, those look like parasite egg sacs. And then he sliced them open and he saw nematodes. He said, they are parasite egg sacs. "So he realized that some of the things we were calling cancer were actually parasite egg sacs. So he got these rats and he got these rat catchers to get these rats. And so they'd catch them wherever they could. And he started giving them these parasites. And he noticed that with this particular nematode type parasite, he was using some groups of rats. They'd all come down with cancer. Other groups, no cancer. "Finally, he says to one of the rat catchers, he says, I don't get it. I know it's the same genus and species of rat you're giving me, but some of them, like, where did this group come from? Because they all got cancer, but not this group. And he said, and the rat catcher says, oh, this. That group that got the cancer. We caught those in a sugar factory. "Let me just reiterate this. Before 1930, we knew that parasites could cause cancer. The only question was it all cancers or some cancers? We knew that it didn't seem to cause cancer unless the animal was vaccinated. And we knew that it didn't seem to cause cancer unless you lived in a high carbohydrate diet system. "Now, what have we been doing since 1930, especially after 1950? We've been vaccinating everybody multiple times. It started with the military in 1918, and then it moved to everybody, especially our children, who are much. They're susceptible. And we are pushing a food pyramid that has the carbohydrates on the bottom. We're 70%. It didn't used to be the case but 70% of American diet now is carbohydrate based. "And yet we have the research before 1930 to show you what that can do with natural parasites. So I, I mean that's, that's kind of the, the, the summary I guess of what I'm going to say. And, and, and they could. And here's the other thing that makes me very suspicious that this is a purposeful biowarfare again. I used to think the government was just, you know, the government doctors were they, they weren't in private practice because they couldn't hack it in private practice and they just were behind the times. But we're not attributing it to a long term plan. And I'm just going to say that, that when he, after he got the Nobel Prize. If you go there today to the Nobel Prize site and you read about him, it says yes, Johannes Fiberger honoring his findings on a gastric tissue growth believed to be cancer induced by a nematode. But this has now been considered as a misjudgment of the Nobel committee as it turned later out not to be true. In other words, they're trying to hide his data. "Well, I could find all his papers and his papers in science you're supposed to have confirmation. So his papers were confirmed by researchers all over the world that independently did the same research essentially. However, when you try to find the paper that, that disputes him. It's all of they claim, these guys claim that it was diet deficiency. It was a vitamin A deficiency. So I tried to look this paper up and here's what I got. No paper link available. Your search was processed without automatic term mapping because it retrieves zero results. In other words, using the standard database pub. We could not find this rebuttal. It was one paper as opposed to all this. You see what I'm saying is it looks like a big cover-up."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1922111722036642161/amplify_video_thumb/1922106753866428416/img/cQxO4-736koQs5PG.jpg)
!["If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world." ~EB Did Burlison See a Craft at the Location He Visited? Umm, No. (Long one here with a transcript and my comments in ( ). Work today so I was a little limited with this stuff. Looking forward to the Davis interview tomorrow!) In 2025, Rep. Eric Burlison spent "almost the entire day" with the White House staff as they negotiated various aspects of the Big Beautiful Bill. While he was there, he requested help with the UFO topic because the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets kept getting blocked and struggled to get access to certain information and locations. So, he asked for a White House-level briefing, "the same briefing the President... If you're taking the request, that's my highest request." (He didn't say if he ever received that briefing.) Burlison: "Furthermore, I would like to be able to have a green light to go visit some of these locations. And the gentleman that I was asking kind of smirked. And I said, 'Is this comical to you? I mean, do you think that I'm not a serious person?'" (I mean, funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? 😀 ) Burlison: "He said, 'No.' he goes. 'I just want to go with you.' And so, it turns out he did. He was able to go with me. He had to follow the proper channels as well. And we visited the first of many sites, hopefully. I'm gonna be cautious in talking about that because I don't want to jeopardize the ability to go to the remaining locations, if you will. I truly think that, for them, this was a test of whether or not this would become a circus for them. And so, I think that I'm just treading cautiously before I release too much information about what I've learned and where I went." (I understand not giving out the location to avoid a "circus" of UFO people trying to visit, but I don't see why he can't tell us what he learned right now. Hopefully, when all the visits are done, he can share the details with us.) James Fox: "Congressman, when you say you went to visit the site, are you implying that the alleged site that could, potentially, be housing non-human technology? Is that kind of what one is alleging here?" Burlison: "Yeah. Or, once did house non-human technology, right? Now, from my insights from Grusch and others, they had...it was pretty obvious that that first site that we were going to did not have active material, but, potentially, could have in the past. So what was important was to see the facilities and the structures, and to try to ascertain for A), first and foremost, did those facilities exist? And then were they designed in such a way that would have been, you know, one could easily see that that could have been utilized for reverse engineering." (Saying that a location/facility could have been utilized for reverse engineering craft not made by humans is not enough to make the waves we need to force the tidal wave of Disclosure. We need for Burlison (or someone else) to be able to visit a facility that has a craft there now, and folks working on it who are willing to speak about their experiences there. I don't see that happening any time soon.) Leslie Kean: "May I ask If the people at the site were cooperative and helpful for you?" Burlison: "Yes." Leslie Kean: "Or were they resistant to having you visit?" Burlison: "No, they were very cooperative. What I kind of interpreted from this is that a lot of what's happening today is that you have things that have happened in the past, and the people today, you know, you're talking about personnel that have changed over many times. And so, a lot of times they're not aware of the history of some of the things that you're talking about because that's not something that they're working on, currently. But they certainly were extremely helpful." (They were either not aware of the history or, they were, and lied about it. Can't rule that out. And the fact that they were helpful/cooperative doesn't really mean much. If you want to avoid unwanted attention, you put your best face on. Or, maybe they really were ignorant and wanted to do their best to help Burlison and the other folks? No way to know.) Burlison: "I had specifically wanted to meet with a particular individual that works at that location, and I actually expected them to turn me down, but was surprised that they actually arranged a meeting in a SCIF with the person that I requested. So, I do think that they're being cooperative." (Hopefully, when all of these locations have been visited, we get to learn this person's name. Full transparency, right?) Burlison: "And now that the President has [posted on Truth Social about UFOs], I think it gives everyone all the way down the line an understanding that this is to be taken seriously and to follow through." (We shall see.) Burlison: "On the way back after the visit, the White House staffer and the other person that had made it happen both said to me that they loved doing this. This was one of the funnest things they've ever done in their job, and that these other future site locations are not at all gonna be a burden to them. If anything, they're excited and looking forward to it." (Are we going to learn who those people are? Transparency? If not, why not? We pay their salaries.) James Fox: "I had a really quick follow-up question, Congressman. If you did find what you're looking for, is there a particular protocol, or what's the directive if you find what you're looking for?" Burlison: "If I find what I'm looking for, I'm gonna be very careful to protect any kind of national-security interest. But at the same time, I've been very clear that it is not the right of this country to withhold basic, fundamental evidence that we may or may not be alone. And so, if we have any kind of evidence of that, we should be telling the world and not holding back. And give as many details as possible, and release...be as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our secrets and national security. Or secrets that pertain...that our national security is dependent upon." (For now, keep the method of propulsion (energy source) secret and away from our adversaries and tell us everything else!) Burlison: "Well, I'm just gonna speculate, okay? If we have a type of technology that we have reverse engineered, that gives us a strategic advantage that our adversaries have not? I think that, for example, letting the world know that we have this craft, here it is, here's a photo of it, but you don't have to tell the world how exactly the...what you've reverse engineered, or how that operates." (Photos aren't going to cut it. If they exist, we need to see these craft (and bodies?) in person, with our own eyes. Put them in the Smithsonian and let us see all of it. And allow independent scientists to do their own analysis so we can verify that it's non-human or anomalous.) Burlison: "In the same way that when the nuclear bomb first was invented and utilized, the world knew, we revealed to the world that we have this capability, but we certainly are not gonna tell people how to make one and the specifics behind that. So, I think that for me, that's how I would answer that question. If you were asking me, 'What would you be willing to protect as far as national security?' That would be the nature of it. "Now, I think if the technology that's derived has nothing to do with changing our threat dynamic with an adversary, and it might benefit society and the world, by all means, let's release it. Let's let the world scientific minds utilize anything that we might have discovered. And so, that's where I personally stand." (But we all that it's not going to be that simple. Most likely (if this is all legit), we'll have craft and bodies, and the tech from the craft can give us an advantage over our adversaries, while at the same time, potentially, be used to change and improve the world and human condition. So what do we do? Keep it secret? Tell the world and take our chances?) Burlison: "I don't know, I couldn't tell you what Hillary meant by that." (EB was referring to the recent interview/deposition about Epstein where Hillary Clinton said that she would release UFO files but they would be "subject to any national security implications" and it should be done so that "no national security information is disclosed." She didn't get specific.) Burlison: "If we have evidence or if we have bodies, we should release that to the world. If we, you know, if what Eric Davis said to me - and now that was not in a hearing in which he had been sworn in, and I'm not saying that he was telling me a falsehood - when he said that there are four alien species - and that kind of went viral - I mean, if we, if we do have evidence of that, I want the world to know. I don't see why that would be of national security interest to withhold that from the world." (Unless, the people who have seen the bodies say something like, "Their skin is something that can be used as armor and we can't allow our adversaries to learn about that. Just trying to think of reasons why the gatekeepers will tell us that information needs to be kept secret.)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2030480027666747596/amplify_video_thumb/2030373285926694913/img/_-25iW0LmiKeRcjI.jpg)
