正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Einstein tried to bring back the aether! Most people think Michelson-Morley (1887) ended the debate but i only ruled out a static luminiferous aether, not all models. In his 1920 Leiden lecture, Einstein argued that general relativity requires space itself to have physical properties. Something you could call an...

AmericanALCHMY's profile picture

American Alchemy

30,283 subscribers

61,619 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one another. They suddenly attract. There must be quantum fluctuations we can't see. We invented 'dark matter' to explain why there appears to be more stickiness with stars that orbit their galaxies. We invented 'dark energy' to explain how the universe can expand faster than the speed of light. What if we add up all the quantum fluctuations across the cosmos? That would be a massive amount of energy. Could that account for 'dark matter?' What if we take it a step further and assume the quantum fluctuations are just the energy seeping through from a vast ocean of potential energy? Could that account for 'dark energy?' That ocean of energy is Spacetime Aether. Tapping into it represents a new source of practically unlimited power for humanity.
1:52

What is the Spacetime Aether? Conventional physics would claim that space is an empty vacuum. It discounts the 'Zero-Point Energy' (ZPE) constantly fluctuating in and out of existence. The Casimir force shows us there is a latent negative energy pressure when we put two parallel plates close to one another. They suddenly attract. There must be quantum fluctuations we can't see. We invented 'dark matter' to explain why there appears to be more stickiness with stars that orbit their galaxies. We invented 'dark energy' to explain how the universe can expand faster than the speed of light. What if we add up all the quantum fluctuations across the cosmos? That would be a massive amount of energy. Could that account for 'dark matter?' What if we take it a step further and assume the quantum fluctuations are just the energy seeping through from a vast ocean of potential energy? Could that account for 'dark energy?' That ocean of energy is Spacetime Aether. Tapping into it represents a new source of practically unlimited power for humanity.

Ashton Forbes

92,416 次观看 • 2 年前

The Non-Traversable Bridge Einstein Found Inside Gravity Einstein’s equations not only describe gravity as a force but as the shape of Spacetime as well. In 1935, Einstein and Rosen found that the Schwarzschild solution could be written in a way that reveals something astonishing: Two separate exterior regions of Spacetime joined by a bridge-like throat Rᵤᵥ = 0 This became known as the Einstein-Rosen Bridge. It is often called a Wormhole, but the classical Einstein-Rosen bridge is not a science-fiction tunnel. In the standard Schwarzschild geometry, it is non-traversable. The throat does not remain open long enough for ordinary travel from one region to the other. Its real power is mathematical. It shows that General Relativity is not merely about objects moving through space. The theory allows Spacetime to have global structure such as different regions, horizons, extensions, and hidden connections that are not visible from one local patch alone. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is one of the earliest glimpses of that deeper idea. Gravity is geometry. And sometimes, geometry has two worlds joined by a throat. #Astrophysics #GeneralRelativity #Einstein #BlackHole #Spacetime #Cosmology #Gravity #Wormhole #Mathematics #Physics
0:56

The Non-Traversable Bridge Einstein Found Inside Gravity Einstein’s equations not only describe gravity as a force but as the shape of Spacetime as well. In 1935, Einstein and Rosen found that the Schwarzschild solution could be written in a way that reveals something astonishing: Two separate exterior regions of Spacetime joined by a bridge-like throat Rᵤᵥ = 0 This became known as the Einstein-Rosen Bridge. It is often called a Wormhole, but the classical Einstein-Rosen bridge is not a science-fiction tunnel. In the standard Schwarzschild geometry, it is non-traversable. The throat does not remain open long enough for ordinary travel from one region to the other. Its real power is mathematical. It shows that General Relativity is not merely about objects moving through space. The theory allows Spacetime to have global structure such as different regions, horizons, extensions, and hidden connections that are not visible from one local patch alone. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is one of the earliest glimpses of that deeper idea. Gravity is geometry. And sometimes, geometry has two worlds joined by a throat. #Astrophysics #GeneralRelativity #Einstein #BlackHole #Spacetime #Cosmology #Gravity #Wormhole #Mathematics #Physics

Mathelirium

91,963 次观看 • 2 个月前

𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 and not undersea cables and "satellites" as we are told? A fascinating theory that I am growing partial to I will simply present the evidence as is so you, dear reader, may come you your own conclusions. Albert Einstein, who had a penchant for womens footwear and Illuminati gang signs, was tasked with hiding the aether from the public with his space-time technobabble, remember there is real science and science falsely so called invented merely to decieve the unwashed masses. AOLs precursor was called AIMNA (Aether Intelligent Messaging Network Architecture) owned by Aether Sytems Inc. We all know the internet actually started off as the ether-net in the 1970s. A Google search takes merely a fraction of a second. This passes thru numerous servers, ISPs, national backbone routes, undersea cables, through more servers, and ends up at Google headquarters in Silicon Valley. It sorts thru trillions of indexes finds millions of answers collates them into order and sends it all the way back again. All in a fraction of a second. 🤔 What most people think is that the data has been cached in your local ISP, but it is merely indexed, not saved. Some could argue that Google has national servers in each country, but even a search for a website on a far-flug local server takes just as long. Consider also the huge amount of hubs, switches, LANs, WANs, nodes, servers, gateways, ISPs, bridges, protocols, and thousands of miles of cables your search query goes thru in half a second traversing anywhere in the world, its pretty incredible and highly unlikely thru a physical network. Not to mention Skype with real-time audio visual thru all these under sea cables with little or no latency? Pre-Einsteinian science was rife with the study of the aether something now considered taboo. They identified something called an aetheron, a unit of aether, that travels at 1.57 times the speed of light, supposedly light was the fastest thing in the universe? If the internet functions thru the aether, why all the cables and networks? This would be for data harvesting and control. The internet is just the tool used to access the aether. Ever notice how you think about someone before they call or the experiments that prove pets know what their owner is doing hundreds of miles away? The aether explains all this. How often do cell phone calls have terrible service and audio quality, yet the internet provides crystal clear streaming on 4k visuals with no glitches? Your phone calls use radio frequency cell towers while the internet is read directly from the aether. Einstein was tasked with hiding the aether for a reason, this was a massive psyop, and I find it hard to believe this was done only to mislead a few egg-headed scientist and not part of some greater deception. I am not a tech guy, so rather than muddy up the waters with my own ideas, I left the information from SpaceBusters as is.
12:27

𝗗𝗼𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗲𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 and not undersea cables and "satellites" as we are told? A fascinating theory that I am growing partial to I will simply present the evidence as is so you, dear reader, may come you your own conclusions. Albert Einstein, who had a penchant for womens footwear and Illuminati gang signs, was tasked with hiding the aether from the public with his space-time technobabble, remember there is real science and science falsely so called invented merely to decieve the unwashed masses. AOLs precursor was called AIMNA (Aether Intelligent Messaging Network Architecture) owned by Aether Sytems Inc. We all know the internet actually started off as the ether-net in the 1970s. A Google search takes merely a fraction of a second. This passes thru numerous servers, ISPs, national backbone routes, undersea cables, through more servers, and ends up at Google headquarters in Silicon Valley. It sorts thru trillions of indexes finds millions of answers collates them into order and sends it all the way back again. All in a fraction of a second. 🤔 What most people think is that the data has been cached in your local ISP, but it is merely indexed, not saved. Some could argue that Google has national servers in each country, but even a search for a website on a far-flug local server takes just as long. Consider also the huge amount of hubs, switches, LANs, WANs, nodes, servers, gateways, ISPs, bridges, protocols, and thousands of miles of cables your search query goes thru in half a second traversing anywhere in the world, its pretty incredible and highly unlikely thru a physical network. Not to mention Skype with real-time audio visual thru all these under sea cables with little or no latency? Pre-Einsteinian science was rife with the study of the aether something now considered taboo. They identified something called an aetheron, a unit of aether, that travels at 1.57 times the speed of light, supposedly light was the fastest thing in the universe? If the internet functions thru the aether, why all the cables and networks? This would be for data harvesting and control. The internet is just the tool used to access the aether. Ever notice how you think about someone before they call or the experiments that prove pets know what their owner is doing hundreds of miles away? The aether explains all this. How often do cell phone calls have terrible service and audio quality, yet the internet provides crystal clear streaming on 4k visuals with no glitches? Your phone calls use radio frequency cell towers while the internet is read directly from the aether. Einstein was tasked with hiding the aether for a reason, this was a massive psyop, and I find it hard to believe this was done only to mislead a few egg-headed scientist and not part of some greater deception. I am not a tech guy, so rather than muddy up the waters with my own ideas, I left the information from SpaceBusters as is.

Politics Is Masonic Theater: 🍞 & 🎪

129,013 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: A future of amazing abundance means that if you can think of it, you can have it. “Sustainable energy, space travel, AI and robotics will bring amazing abundance to everyone. It’s really the only path to amazing abundance. It's not to say it can’t go wrong, but I think it’ll probably go right. It’ll be a future that you love. It’s the best future I can think of. Then, we go beyond the Moon, beyond Mars, and sail through the Rings of Saturn. Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could take a trip to Saturn? Frankly, if you have a trip to Saturn, I think things will be free in the future. It sounds nuts, but if you’ve got an AI-robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met. If you can think of it, you can have it. Iain Banks in his Culture books has it pretty much right: there actually isn’t money in the future, and there’s abundance for everyone. If you can think of it, you can have it. That means anyone could have a trip to Saturn—it won’t be just a few people. If you want it, you can have it.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026
1:16

Elon Musk: A future of amazing abundance means that if you can think of it, you can have it. “Sustainable energy, space travel, AI and robotics will bring amazing abundance to everyone. It’s really the only path to amazing abundance. It's not to say it can’t go wrong, but I think it’ll probably go right. It’ll be a future that you love. It’s the best future I can think of. Then, we go beyond the Moon, beyond Mars, and sail through the Rings of Saturn. Wouldn’t it be amazing if you could take a trip to Saturn? Frankly, if you have a trip to Saturn, I think things will be free in the future. It sounds nuts, but if you’ve got an AI-robotics economy that is anywhere close to a million times the size of the current Earth economy, literally any need you possibly want can be met. If you can think of it, you can have it. Iain Banks in his Culture books has it pretty much right: there actually isn’t money in the future, and there’s abundance for everyone. If you can think of it, you can have it. That means anyone could have a trip to Saturn—it won’t be just a few people. If you want it, you can have it.” From: Terafab announcement, March 21, 2026

ELON CLIPS

10,193 次观看 • 4 个月前

“how does writing from kind of a vampire’s perspective challenge you, as opposed to writing something from your perspective, if that makes sense?” 🦮 we’re in comic-con right now talking about the dark moon. we started that since our debut, and we built that kind of its own fandom base. and, like, it’s so cool to see now because to be 100% honest, we didn’t know that it would be like this when we started it. but like you said, it might be challenging to kind of all thread that together in one album, have that vampire-like story also. but we think of it as like a benefit almost because we know that there’s people… there’s a huge fandom around vampires itself, and we’re very lucky that we built the space around that world that we’re able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. and overall, i think it’s just new ways or ne doors that can be opened into this big kind of thing that we build. yeah, not just our album, not just us, but also just enhypen itself. 🦮 some people might just listen to our music, and they might just like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampire aspects of the album. there’s different types of people that can just come together into one album. i think it is challenging at times to time, but we think of it as just another factor that can be used as a benefit.
1:57

“how does writing from kind of a vampire’s perspective challenge you, as opposed to writing something from your perspective, if that makes sense?” 🦮 we’re in comic-con right now talking about the dark moon. we started that since our debut, and we built that kind of its own fandom base. and, like, it’s so cool to see now because to be 100% honest, we didn’t know that it would be like this when we started it. but like you said, it might be challenging to kind of all thread that together in one album, have that vampire-like story also. but we think of it as like a benefit almost because we know that there’s people… there’s a huge fandom around vampires itself, and we’re very lucky that we built the space around that world that we’re able to kind of talk about it in our album as well. and overall, i think it’s just new ways or ne doors that can be opened into this big kind of thing that we build. yeah, not just our album, not just us, but also just enhypen itself. 🦮 some people might just listen to our music, and they might just like listening to music, that might be it. but some people might really enjoy the vampire aspects of the album. there’s different types of people that can just come together into one album. i think it is challenging at times to time, but we think of it as just another factor that can be used as a benefit.

ɪᴄɪᴇʟ. 🐚

15,564 次观看 • 1 个月前

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, says the AGI definition the industry uses is too low a bar. His Einstein test: train a system on a 1901 knowledge cutoff and ask it to invent special relativity. "The human brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is even possible." "That's a pretty high bar, and it means that it's probably higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work." "The type of test I would have is like an Einstein test of, you know, let's train one of these systems with a 1901 knowledge cutoff. Can it invent special relativity like Einstein did in 1905?" "What you'd actually want is something a future version of AlphaGo to be able to invent Go, right? Invent a game as deep and as complex and elegant and as beautiful as Go, not just come up with a strategy within the game." "I don't think today's systems are yet capable of doing that, but I think they will be able to in the future." - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, on The Next Big Thing.
2:52

Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, says the AGI definition the industry uses is too low a bar. His Einstein test: train a system on a 1901 knowledge cutoff and ask it to invent special relativity. "The human brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is even possible." "That's a pretty high bar, and it means that it's probably higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work." "The type of test I would have is like an Einstein test of, you know, let's train one of these systems with a 1901 knowledge cutoff. Can it invent special relativity like Einstein did in 1905?" "What you'd actually want is something a future version of AlphaGo to be able to invent Go, right? Invent a game as deep and as complex and elegant and as beautiful as Go, not just come up with a strategy within the game." "I don't think today's systems are yet capable of doing that, but I think they will be able to in the future." - Demis Hassabis (Demis Hassabis), CEO of Google DeepMind, on The Next Big Thing.

Karl Mehta

72,911 次观看 • 1 个月前

Our general understanding of the characteristics of the physical world are largely restricted by the limited range of our senses. The world appears to be comprised of tangible objects positioned within empty space, separate and distinct. Neither of these characterizations are true. Our unaided senses generate a false interpretation of the true state of reality. Space is note empty, it is substantive with a quantifiable and measurable energy density. Space, in terms of quantum vacuum fluctuations, can be considered as a veritable sea of oscillating energy, like a fluid, quantized at the Planck scale (a billion trillion trillion times smaller than a centimeter) as Planck spherical units, and these tiny oscillators make up the fluid medium of space and comprise the "material" stuff as well. Imagine being able to directly perceive this level of reality. Our photodetector proteins in our eyes are sensitive to electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range of 400 to 800 terahertz (trillions of oscillations per second), and we call this "visible light". If, however, we could see light at the Planck scale, were photons oscillate at the Planck frequency— a mass-energy value that makes the electromagnetic component at order of unity with spacetime curvature— then we would theoretically see directly the substantive fluid medium of space and our sight would relay a world that is integrally interconnected and all one substance; objects would not appear as separate and distinct or even fundamentally different than the substance comprising the bulk space. "Material" objects would appear just as patterned vortices of the fluid that is the very substance of space. So, tangible objects are made of the same substance as space, and only seem physical to our limited senses because of electromagnetic repulsive forces. The electromagnetic repulsive forces are generated by how these PSUs circulate and flow within the structured patterns of space that we call particles and atoms. In this way, the coherent phases, circulation, flow, and pressure forces of this Planck plasma fluid are the source of mass, force, and charge. We are now coming to an understanding of these dynamics at a fundamental level, exemplified in the publication The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity 🔗
0:45

Our general understanding of the characteristics of the physical world are largely restricted by the limited range of our senses. The world appears to be comprised of tangible objects positioned within empty space, separate and distinct. Neither of these characterizations are true. Our unaided senses generate a false interpretation of the true state of reality. Space is note empty, it is substantive with a quantifiable and measurable energy density. Space, in terms of quantum vacuum fluctuations, can be considered as a veritable sea of oscillating energy, like a fluid, quantized at the Planck scale (a billion trillion trillion times smaller than a centimeter) as Planck spherical units, and these tiny oscillators make up the fluid medium of space and comprise the "material" stuff as well. Imagine being able to directly perceive this level of reality. Our photodetector proteins in our eyes are sensitive to electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range of 400 to 800 terahertz (trillions of oscillations per second), and we call this "visible light". If, however, we could see light at the Planck scale, were photons oscillate at the Planck frequency— a mass-energy value that makes the electromagnetic component at order of unity with spacetime curvature— then we would theoretically see directly the substantive fluid medium of space and our sight would relay a world that is integrally interconnected and all one substance; objects would not appear as separate and distinct or even fundamentally different than the substance comprising the bulk space. "Material" objects would appear just as patterned vortices of the fluid that is the very substance of space. So, tangible objects are made of the same substance as space, and only seem physical to our limited senses because of electromagnetic repulsive forces. The electromagnetic repulsive forces are generated by how these PSUs circulate and flow within the structured patterns of space that we call particles and atoms. In this way, the coherent phases, circulation, flow, and pressure forces of this Planck plasma fluid are the source of mass, force, and charge. We are now coming to an understanding of these dynamics at a fundamental level, exemplified in the publication The Origin of Mass and the Nature of Gravity 🔗

Nassim Haramein

15,937 次观看 • 2 年前

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."
1:03

🚨 JUST IN: Senate Leader John Thune says he will FORCE a vote on the SAVE America Act, but he can NOT guarantee it will pass because that needs 60 votes "That debate will happen. But like I said, I can guarantee the debate. I can guarantee a vote. I just can't guarantee an outcome." "There are a lot of optimistic views about what Democrats may or may not do. We all know, because we deal with them every day, that the Democrats are not all of a sudden going to decide that this is something they want to be for." "I think you have a lot of optimists out there, and I appreciate that, and a lot of passion and energy behind getting an outcome here." "But getting an outcome would require Democrat votes." "And, you know, we'll give them a chance. Like I said, they'll have that opportunity to vote one way or the other on this. But I would be very, very surprised."

Eric Daugherty

304,559 次观看 • 5 个月前

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)
0:52

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei : "Software is going to become cheap, maybe essentially free. The premise that you need to amortize a piece of software you build across millions of users, that may start to be false. But at the same time, there are whole jobs, whole careers that we've built for decades that may not be present. And, you know, I think we can deal with it. I think we can adjust to it. But I don't, I don't think there's an awareness at all of what, of what is coming here and the magnitude of it." --- From "The Wall Street Journal" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

798,662 次观看 • 3 个月前

Happy National Space Day! 🇮🇳🚀 Today marks the anniversary of the successful Chandrayaan-3 mission in 2023—a moment that made every Indian proud and reminded the world of what India is capable of achieving. But a legacy is not just something we inherit; it is something we have a responsibility to carry forward. When I flew to space last year, it was not merely a technical or personal accomplishment. In many ways, it was the realisation of the dreams, aspirations and possibilities of an entire nation. I was fortunate to be the one representing India, but the journey belonged to all of us. National Space Day is therefore a celebration of both—the remarkable achievements of our past and the promise of what lies ahead. May we continue to dream bigger, explore further and create milestones that future generations will look back on with the same pride we feel today. The journey continues. #shux #space #shubhanshushukla #india #thesecondorbit
1:23

Happy National Space Day! 🇮🇳🚀 Today marks the anniversary of the successful Chandrayaan-3 mission in 2023—a moment that made every Indian proud and reminded the world of what India is capable of achieving. But a legacy is not just something we inherit; it is something we have a responsibility to carry forward. When I flew to space last year, it was not merely a technical or personal accomplishment. In many ways, it was the realisation of the dreams, aspirations and possibilities of an entire nation. I was fortunate to be the one representing India, but the journey belonged to all of us. National Space Day is therefore a celebration of both—the remarkable achievements of our past and the promise of what lies ahead. May we continue to dream bigger, explore further and create milestones that future generations will look back on with the same pride we feel today. The journey continues. #shux #space #shubhanshushukla #india #thesecondorbit

Shubhanshu Shukla

52,273 次观看 • 11 天前

Asked Rudy Gobert what he meant by accountability and where that accountability needs to come from. "It starts with ourselves, but it seems like we don't have that. So I think at some point, from the coaches, yeah, from the coaches. It's not an easy position for a coach to take guys out of the game. It's not something you want to do. But I think if the players don't show any effort, at some point, no matter how talented we are as a team, if you don't have that, we just can't be a winning team. It starts with me. If I'm not showing effort, take me out the game. And everybody else gotta follow. Our best players, our leaders, if you don't show any effort, don't matter if you score 50, we're just not gonna win. So at some point, we're not mature enough to have that accountability ourselves. That might be the solution. And I guarantee (if that happens), when we come back on the court, we'd show effort."
1:20

Asked Rudy Gobert what he meant by accountability and where that accountability needs to come from. "It starts with ourselves, but it seems like we don't have that. So I think at some point, from the coaches, yeah, from the coaches. It's not an easy position for a coach to take guys out of the game. It's not something you want to do. But I think if the players don't show any effort, at some point, no matter how talented we are as a team, if you don't have that, we just can't be a winning team. It starts with me. If I'm not showing effort, take me out the game. And everybody else gotta follow. Our best players, our leaders, if you don't show any effort, don't matter if you score 50, we're just not gonna win. So at some point, we're not mature enough to have that accountability ourselves. That might be the solution. And I guarantee (if that happens), when we come back on the court, we'd show effort."

Dane Moore

328,159 次观看 • 6 个月前

Zohran Mamdani on his vision for the future of the Democratic Party: “When we think about the New Deal, when we think about what we could deliver and the scale of what we deliver for working people, that’s what we have to bring back to our politics because for too long it’s felt as if politics is a hobby for those who can afford to have it not something that could deliver a better life for those who are being priced out of one today”
0:49

Zohran Mamdani on his vision for the future of the Democratic Party: “When we think about the New Deal, when we think about what we could deliver and the scale of what we deliver for working people, that’s what we have to bring back to our politics because for too long it’s felt as if politics is a hobby for those who can afford to have it not something that could deliver a better life for those who are being priced out of one today”

Really American 🇺🇸

19,126 次观看 • 21 天前

Elon Musk said the most important thing anyone has said this century. Musk: “I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare, and it might only be us.” 13.8 billion years. Trillions of galaxies. Billions of trillions of stars. Not one signal from any of them. That silence is the loudest data point in human history. Musk: “The image in my mind is of a tiny candle in a vast darkness. A tiny candle of consciousness that could easily go out.” That is not poetry. That is a threat assessment from the only person on Earth building the response. Stars don’t know they burn. Black holes don’t know they consume. The universe has been running for 13.8 billion years with no awareness of itself. We are the only known point in all of that time and all of that space where matter woke up and understood what it was looking at. Every law of nature ran in complete silence for billions of years. Gravity pulled. Light traveled. Elements fused. None of it meant anything. Because meaning requires a mind. And there might only be one. Musk is not building rockets because he likes engineering. He is building an escape route for the only thing in the universe that knows the universe exists. If consciousness disappears, the stars keep burning. The physics keeps running. But the universe is no longer a universe. It is just matter moving through space with nothing to call it that. The most profound thing Musk said is not that the candle is small. It is that without the candle, there is no such thing as light or darkness. Just physics performing to an empty room for the rest of eternity. One man looked at that and said no.
0:33

Elon Musk said the most important thing anyone has said this century. Musk: “I think we need to assume that life and consciousness is extremely rare, and it might only be us.” 13.8 billion years. Trillions of galaxies. Billions of trillions of stars. Not one signal from any of them. That silence is the loudest data point in human history. Musk: “The image in my mind is of a tiny candle in a vast darkness. A tiny candle of consciousness that could easily go out.” That is not poetry. That is a threat assessment from the only person on Earth building the response. Stars don’t know they burn. Black holes don’t know they consume. The universe has been running for 13.8 billion years with no awareness of itself. We are the only known point in all of that time and all of that space where matter woke up and understood what it was looking at. Every law of nature ran in complete silence for billions of years. Gravity pulled. Light traveled. Elements fused. None of it meant anything. Because meaning requires a mind. And there might only be one. Musk is not building rockets because he likes engineering. He is building an escape route for the only thing in the universe that knows the universe exists. If consciousness disappears, the stars keep burning. The physics keeps running. But the universe is no longer a universe. It is just matter moving through space with nothing to call it that. The most profound thing Musk said is not that the candle is small. It is that without the candle, there is no such thing as light or darkness. Just physics performing to an empty room for the rest of eternity. One man looked at that and said no.

Dustin

61,244 次观看 • 1 个月前

Asked Jaylen Brown about the Celtics’ identity of playing hard, no matter what else: “It just started from before the season — we just set a precedent, just set a tone for what we want Celtics basketball to be. And it wasn't an excuse for none of our guys, not me, or for anyone from top to the bottom. If you're not playing hard, if you're not doing what you're supposed to be doing, you're not putting in the effort, then you don't need to be out on the floor.” “And I think the fans respect that more than anything. The X’s and O’s, will be the X's and O’s, make or miss shots, but your effort — playing hard, defending, things like that — that’s stuff that I think the city of Boston that represents.”
1:47

Asked Jaylen Brown about the Celtics’ identity of playing hard, no matter what else: “It just started from before the season — we just set a precedent, just set a tone for what we want Celtics basketball to be. And it wasn't an excuse for none of our guys, not me, or for anyone from top to the bottom. If you're not playing hard, if you're not doing what you're supposed to be doing, you're not putting in the effort, then you don't need to be out on the floor.” “And I think the fans respect that more than anything. The X’s and O’s, will be the X's and O’s, make or miss shots, but your effort — playing hard, defending, things like that — that’s stuff that I think the city of Boston that represents.”

Noa Dalzell 🏀

19,091 次观看 • 7 个月前

Today marks the 9th anniversary of Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing. With his indefatigable commitment to constitutional originalism and textualism, Justice Scalia helped build what is the modern conservative legal movement. Thanks to him, we think about the law and the role of courts much differently than we did a generation ago. “They call it the living Constitution...I will call mine an enduring Constitution, one that doesn't change, one that has the force and the meaning today that it had when it was adopted. But the living Constitution, as I told you, is popular not only among lawyers, judges, and law professors, it has drifted down to the people.”
5:51

Today marks the 9th anniversary of Justice Antonin Scalia’s passing. With his indefatigable commitment to constitutional originalism and textualism, Justice Scalia helped build what is the modern conservative legal movement. Thanks to him, we think about the law and the role of courts much differently than we did a generation ago. “They call it the living Constitution...I will call mine an enduring Constitution, one that doesn't change, one that has the force and the meaning today that it had when it was adopted. But the living Constitution, as I told you, is popular not only among lawyers, judges, and law professors, it has drifted down to the people.”

Carrie Severino

351,187 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON MUSK: The only way to reach 1,000 terawatts of AI power is a mass driver on the Moon. "In order to get to 1,000x from a terawatt per year. The only way that we can really achieve that is on the moon with a mass driver, essentially where you do local production of photovoltaics and radiators on the moon, maybe you bring the chips from Earth, or you could conceivably make the chips on the moon, and but you need most of the mass to be made on the moon, so you don't have to transport it to the moon from Earth, and then because the moon has no atmosphere and only 1/6 Earth's gravity, you can accelerate the AI satellites into deep space without a rocket, so you can basically shoot them into space using an electromagnetic gun, like a, like a rail gun type. I mean, just, it's basically a linear electric motor, as a way to think about it."
1:06

ELON MUSK: The only way to reach 1,000 terawatts of AI power is a mass driver on the Moon. "In order to get to 1,000x from a terawatt per year. The only way that we can really achieve that is on the moon with a mass driver, essentially where you do local production of photovoltaics and radiators on the moon, maybe you bring the chips from Earth, or you could conceivably make the chips on the moon, and but you need most of the mass to be made on the moon, so you don't have to transport it to the moon from Earth, and then because the moon has no atmosphere and only 1/6 Earth's gravity, you can accelerate the AI satellites into deep space without a rocket, so you can basically shoot them into space using an electromagnetic gun, like a, like a rail gun type. I mean, just, it's basically a linear electric motor, as a way to think about it."

DogeDesigner

122,377 次观看 • 2 个月前

v8’s safety guidelines for the listening party on sunday 🎱 i hope everyone stays safe, since the venue isn't that big 🐻‍❄ not just the space itself, the venue is on an alley side - it could be very crowded 🎱 once you go out, it can be a bit cramped so it could be dangerous 🐻‍❄ since it's on a sunday night, there could be a lot of people in the area but i hope you can have fun safely 🎱 first, please dress comfortably when you come. if you bring a bag, it can be difficult 🐻‍❄ keep your things to a minimum and it's going to be very hot there, so dress light and bring as little as possible
0:41

v8’s safety guidelines for the listening party on sunday 🎱 i hope everyone stays safe, since the venue isn't that big 🐻‍❄ not just the space itself, the venue is on an alley side - it could be very crowded 🎱 once you go out, it can be a bit cramped so it could be dangerous 🐻‍❄ since it's on a sunday night, there could be a lot of people in the area but i hope you can have fun safely 🎱 first, please dress comfortably when you come. if you bring a bag, it can be difficult 🐻‍❄ keep your things to a minimum and it's going to be very hot there, so dress light and bring as little as possible

🎧

48,719 次观看 • 2 个月前

Demis Hassabis on the limit in today’s AI: language can describe the world, but it cannot contain it - and why "World Models" are his "longest standing passion". Language models absorbed far more structure about reality from text than many researchers expected, because human language quietly carries physics, psychology, culture, tools, plans, and cause-and-effect. But text is still a compressed residue of experience, not experience itself. A sentence can say a cup falls from a table, yet it does not fully encode weight, grip, balance, friction, timing, sound, surprise, or the tiny motor corrections a body makes before it even notices them. The world is not only made of facts that can be named; it is made of constraints that have to be lived through, touched, predicted, violated, and repaired. That is why world models matter. They aim to learn the hidden grammar of physical reality: how objects persist, how forces unfold, how space changes when an agent moves, and how action creates feedback. Language models can often reason about the world because people have written so much about it. World models try to learn what the world is like before it becomes words. The difference is exactly what matters because intelligence is not just answering well; it is knowing what would happen next if you moved, reached, pushed, smelled, slipped, or failed. A mind trained only on descriptions may become brilliant at explanation. A mind trained on experience may become better at consequence. --- Full video from "Google DeepMind" and "Hannah Fry" YT channel (link in comment)
1:37

Demis Hassabis on the limit in today’s AI: language can describe the world, but it cannot contain it - and why "World Models" are his "longest standing passion". Language models absorbed far more structure about reality from text than many researchers expected, because human language quietly carries physics, psychology, culture, tools, plans, and cause-and-effect. But text is still a compressed residue of experience, not experience itself. A sentence can say a cup falls from a table, yet it does not fully encode weight, grip, balance, friction, timing, sound, surprise, or the tiny motor corrections a body makes before it even notices them. The world is not only made of facts that can be named; it is made of constraints that have to be lived through, touched, predicted, violated, and repaired. That is why world models matter. They aim to learn the hidden grammar of physical reality: how objects persist, how forces unfold, how space changes when an agent moves, and how action creates feedback. Language models can often reason about the world because people have written so much about it. World models try to learn what the world is like before it becomes words. The difference is exactly what matters because intelligence is not just answering well; it is knowing what would happen next if you moved, reached, pushed, smelled, slipped, or failed. A mind trained only on descriptions may become brilliant at explanation. A mind trained on experience may become better at consequence. --- Full video from "Google DeepMind" and "Hannah Fry" YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

49,938 次观看 • 3 个月前

The smartest man in AI just exposed the whole AGI narrative as a LIE. And he used a physics problem from 1905 to prove it. His name is Demis Hassabis. He runs Google DeepMind, and won the Nobel Prize for using AI to crack a problem in biology that had stumped scientists for 50 years. Almost nobody in this industry has a track record like his. He went on the NothingButTech podcast and called out the biggest lie in AI right now: Right now the loudest voices in AI are telling you that AGI is basically here. OpenAI has literally defined AGI as a system that can outperform humans at most "economically valuable work." In other words, if it replaces enough jobs, we have arrived. Hassabis thinks that bar is a joke. He said real general intelligence has to do what the human brain can do, because the brain is the only proof we have that this kind of intelligence is even possible. He called that "a higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work," which is about as close as a polite British Nobel laureate gets to calling his rivals out. Then he gave the actual test: Today's AI has read everything humans have ever written, including the theory of relativity. So when it explains relativity back to you, it's repeating an answer that already exists. That's not intelligence. So Hassabis proposed a test that makes memorization impossible. Train an AI on only what humanity knew in 1901, four years BEFORE Einstein published relativity. Then ask it to come up with relativity on its own. It can't look up the answer, because in 1901 the answer doesn't exist yet. The only way to pass is to do what Einstein actually did: Take the same physics everyone else had and reason its way to an idea no human had ever had. Hassabis says not a single AI today can, no matter how much it has memorized. Which means what we keep calling "almost AGI" is really just the best librarian in history. It can find any answer that already exists but it cannot create one that doesn't. His second version is even sharper: AlphaGo, the system his own team built, famously invented a brand new move that no human had played in 2,000 years of the game. Everyone called it genius but Hassabis says that still is not the bar. The real test is not whether an AI can invent a new move inside Go, it is whether an AI could INVENT a game as deep and as beautiful as Go in the first place. No model that exists today can do it. The people telling you AGI has already arrived are the same people raising hundreds of billions of dollars on that exact promise. The valuations only work if the finish line is right in front of us. So the finish line keeps getting dragged closer, and AGI keeps getting quietly redefined down to "does useful work," until the products they already sell happen to qualify. Hassabis has nothing to prove and nothing to sell you. He already won the Nobel, and he is telling you the machines still cannot do the one thing that would make them genuinely intelligent, which is have a truly original idea. To be fair to him, he is not a pessimist about it. He believes real AGI IS coming, and he is spending his life building it. He just refuses to pretend it is already sitting in your phone. So the next time a founder tells you AGI is months away, remember that the one man in the room with a Nobel Prize built his test around Einstein, and admitted that nothing we have made can pass it. What do you think?
2:45

The smartest man in AI just exposed the whole AGI narrative as a LIE. And he used a physics problem from 1905 to prove it. His name is Demis Hassabis. He runs Google DeepMind, and won the Nobel Prize for using AI to crack a problem in biology that had stumped scientists for 50 years. Almost nobody in this industry has a track record like his. He went on the NothingButTech podcast and called out the biggest lie in AI right now: Right now the loudest voices in AI are telling you that AGI is basically here. OpenAI has literally defined AGI as a system that can outperform humans at most "economically valuable work." In other words, if it replaces enough jobs, we have arrived. Hassabis thinks that bar is a joke. He said real general intelligence has to do what the human brain can do, because the brain is the only proof we have that this kind of intelligence is even possible. He called that "a higher bar than just being able to do some useful economic work," which is about as close as a polite British Nobel laureate gets to calling his rivals out. Then he gave the actual test: Today's AI has read everything humans have ever written, including the theory of relativity. So when it explains relativity back to you, it's repeating an answer that already exists. That's not intelligence. So Hassabis proposed a test that makes memorization impossible. Train an AI on only what humanity knew in 1901, four years BEFORE Einstein published relativity. Then ask it to come up with relativity on its own. It can't look up the answer, because in 1901 the answer doesn't exist yet. The only way to pass is to do what Einstein actually did: Take the same physics everyone else had and reason its way to an idea no human had ever had. Hassabis says not a single AI today can, no matter how much it has memorized. Which means what we keep calling "almost AGI" is really just the best librarian in history. It can find any answer that already exists but it cannot create one that doesn't. His second version is even sharper: AlphaGo, the system his own team built, famously invented a brand new move that no human had played in 2,000 years of the game. Everyone called it genius but Hassabis says that still is not the bar. The real test is not whether an AI can invent a new move inside Go, it is whether an AI could INVENT a game as deep and as beautiful as Go in the first place. No model that exists today can do it. The people telling you AGI has already arrived are the same people raising hundreds of billions of dollars on that exact promise. The valuations only work if the finish line is right in front of us. So the finish line keeps getting dragged closer, and AGI keeps getting quietly redefined down to "does useful work," until the products they already sell happen to qualify. Hassabis has nothing to prove and nothing to sell you. He already won the Nobel, and he is telling you the machines still cannot do the one thing that would make them genuinely intelligent, which is have a truly original idea. To be fair to him, he is not a pessimist about it. He believes real AGI IS coming, and he is spending his life building it. He just refuses to pretend it is already sitting in your phone. So the next time a founder tells you AGI is months away, remember that the one man in the room with a Nobel Prize built his test around Einstein, and admitted that nothing we have made can pass it. What do you think?

Ricardo

1,287,455 次观看 • 2 个月前