正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

ELON MUSK ON BATTERIES DOUBLING ENERGY OUTPUT A foundational shift toward abundance. “What batteries actually enable is, even if you don't build any incremental power plants, you could double the energy output of the United States just with batteries. This is a super big deal.” This isn’t about generating...

LaceyPresley's profile picture

Lacey

6,572 subscribers

38,401 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ELON: BATTERIES COULD DOUBLE U.S. ENERGY WITHOUT BUILDING A SINGLE PLANT Elon said the U.S. already produces far more power than it actually uses at any given moment. The problem isn’t generation, it’s timing. Huge amounts of energy go unused every night while demand spikes during the day. Storage, not new plants, is the missing link. In his view, batteries alone could unlock a massive increase in usable energy. “Peak power output of the U.S. is around 1.1 terawatts, but the average power usage is only half a terawatt. So if you just buffer the energy, charge the batteries at night, discharge during the day, without incremental capital expenses, without building new power plants, you can double the energy throughput of the U.S. The energy output per year can double with batteries. And do we have those batteries?” Source: Moonshots
3:40

ELON: BATTERIES COULD DOUBLE U.S. ENERGY WITHOUT BUILDING A SINGLE PLANT Elon said the U.S. already produces far more power than it actually uses at any given moment. The problem isn’t generation, it’s timing. Huge amounts of energy go unused every night while demand spikes during the day. Storage, not new plants, is the missing link. In his view, batteries alone could unlock a massive increase in usable energy. “Peak power output of the U.S. is around 1.1 terawatts, but the average power usage is only half a terawatt. So if you just buffer the energy, charge the batteries at night, discharge during the day, without incremental capital expenses, without building new power plants, you can double the energy throughput of the U.S. The energy output per year can double with batteries. And do we have those batteries?” Source: Moonshots

Mario Nawfal

50,591 次观看 • 7 个月前

ELON: HERE’S HOW WE’LL DOUBLE U.S. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION “If you look at the total U.S. power generation capability, it's roughly a terawatt, but the average power usage is less than half a terawatt. That's because there are big differences in power usage between day and night. So, the daily and seasonal variations in power consumption mean that the United States, and really every country, is only producing about half as much electrical energy as it could. Because without batteries, there's no effective way to buffer the energy. So, what batteries actually enable is that even if you don't build any incremental power plants, you could double the energy output of the United States just with batteries. This is a super big deal. And, in fact, I think that's really where most of the incremental energy production in the United States is going to come from, is literally batteries. So, a bigger deal than it may seem.” Source: Elon Musk, Tesla Shareholder Meeting, November 6, 2025
0:52

ELON: HERE’S HOW WE’LL DOUBLE U.S. ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION “If you look at the total U.S. power generation capability, it's roughly a terawatt, but the average power usage is less than half a terawatt. That's because there are big differences in power usage between day and night. So, the daily and seasonal variations in power consumption mean that the United States, and really every country, is only producing about half as much electrical energy as it could. Because without batteries, there's no effective way to buffer the energy. So, what batteries actually enable is that even if you don't build any incremental power plants, you could double the energy output of the United States just with batteries. This is a super big deal. And, in fact, I think that's really where most of the incremental energy production in the United States is going to come from, is literally batteries. So, a bigger deal than it may seem.” Source: Elon Musk, Tesla Shareholder Meeting, November 6, 2025

Mario Nawfal

309,741 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 ELON MUSK: "Batteries are going to be a massive thing. The scale of battery demand, I think not that many people appreciate just how gigantic the scale of battery demand is. The sustained power output from the US grid is around 1 TW, but average usage is less than half of it. If you add batteries to the mix, you can run the power plants 24/7 at full capacity. More than doubling the energy output per year of the United States, just with batteries."
0:55

🚨 ELON MUSK: "Batteries are going to be a massive thing. The scale of battery demand, I think not that many people appreciate just how gigantic the scale of battery demand is. The sustained power output from the US grid is around 1 TW, but average usage is less than half of it. If you add batteries to the mix, you can run the power plants 24/7 at full capacity. More than doubling the energy output per year of the United States, just with batteries."

DogeDesigner

11,469,781 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: We’re heading toward a future where human intelligence becomes a microscopic minority—not just on Earth, but across the entire solar system. Best case? Earth-based intelligence only taps into about one billionth of the Sun’s energy. That’s it. Just a fraction of a fraction. Even the total solar energy reaching Earth is roughly half a billionth of the Sun’s output—and that’s already the majority of what we can access today. Now imagine expanding beyond Earth. The moment intelligence scales into the solar system, the gap explodes. Orders of magnitude more energy. Orders of magnitude more intelligence. What exists on Earth today becomes almost negligible in comparison. We’re not just building smarter systems—we’re entering an era where intelligence itself scales with energy. And the solar system has almost unlimited supply. The real question isn’t if this happens… it’s how humanity fits into a world where it’s no longer the dominant form of intelligence.
1:07

Elon Musk: We’re heading toward a future where human intelligence becomes a microscopic minority—not just on Earth, but across the entire solar system. Best case? Earth-based intelligence only taps into about one billionth of the Sun’s energy. That’s it. Just a fraction of a fraction. Even the total solar energy reaching Earth is roughly half a billionth of the Sun’s output—and that’s already the majority of what we can access today. Now imagine expanding beyond Earth. The moment intelligence scales into the solar system, the gap explodes. Orders of magnitude more energy. Orders of magnitude more intelligence. What exists on Earth today becomes almost negligible in comparison. We’re not just building smarter systems—we’re entering an era where intelligence itself scales with energy. And the solar system has almost unlimited supply. The real question isn’t if this happens… it’s how humanity fits into a world where it’s no longer the dominant form of intelligence.

Ian Miles Cheong

17,543 次观看 • 5 个月前

ELON: WE DON'T NEED A FUSION REACTOR; WE HAVE THE SUN "We already have a giant fusion reactor in the sky that's called the sun that shows up every day. It converts about four and a half million tons of mass to energy every second and requires no maintenance; it's amazing. You don't have to refuel it; you don't have to maintain it; it's just there. So my recommendation for fusion is solar power and batteries, and we can easily power all of Earth just with photovoltaics and batteries. I mean, not easily, but there's just a very clear path to do so, and no miracles required, just work." Source: WSJ
0:52

ELON: WE DON'T NEED A FUSION REACTOR; WE HAVE THE SUN "We already have a giant fusion reactor in the sky that's called the sun that shows up every day. It converts about four and a half million tons of mass to energy every second and requires no maintenance; it's amazing. You don't have to refuel it; you don't have to maintain it; it's just there. So my recommendation for fusion is solar power and batteries, and we can easily power all of Earth just with photovoltaics and batteries. I mean, not easily, but there's just a very clear path to do so, and no miracles required, just work." Source: WSJ

Mario Nawfal

390,399 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk just explained why the most important AI company on Earth might be a rocket company. The human brain is 2% of body mass. It burns 20% of the body’s total energy. Intelligence has always been an energy problem disguised as an information problem. The entire tech industry missed this. Musk: “Those who have lived in software land don’t realize that they’re about to have a hard lesson in hardware.” Every new model is hungrier than the last. Every training run devours more electricity than the one before. The grid was not built for this. Utility companies move at geological speed. Interconnection takes years. Permitting takes years. Construction takes years. AI moves in months. Musk: “You’re going to hit the wall big time on power generation. They already are.” The obvious answer is private power plants next to data centers. Musk: “Where do you get the power plants? Where do you get the power plants from?” You cannot will a turbine into existence with venture capital. Every atom on Earth is bound by friction, gravity, and regulation. Most people stare at this wall and see the ceiling on intelligence. They are looking in the wrong direction. In orbit there is no night. No clouds. No seasons. No permitting. No grid. Unfiltered solar energy feeding silicon every hour of every day. Musk: “It’s 10 times cheaper because you don’t need any batteries.” That single number rewrites the entire economics of intelligence. Musk: “The moment your cost of access to space becomes low, by far the cheapest and most scalable way to generate tokens is space.” SpaceX is not a rocket company. It is quietly becoming the most important energy infrastructure play on the planet. Starship is not about Mars. It is about making orbit so cheap that building on the ground becomes the irrational choice. Every major leap in intelligence followed the same pattern. Not a smarter algorithm. A bigger energy source. Fire grew the human brain. Fossil fuels built the computer. The next source isn’t on this planet. The ceiling on intelligence was never artificial. It was always gravitational. The future will not be decided by who builds the best model. It will be decided by who builds the cheapest rocket.
1:02

Elon Musk just explained why the most important AI company on Earth might be a rocket company. The human brain is 2% of body mass. It burns 20% of the body’s total energy. Intelligence has always been an energy problem disguised as an information problem. The entire tech industry missed this. Musk: “Those who have lived in software land don’t realize that they’re about to have a hard lesson in hardware.” Every new model is hungrier than the last. Every training run devours more electricity than the one before. The grid was not built for this. Utility companies move at geological speed. Interconnection takes years. Permitting takes years. Construction takes years. AI moves in months. Musk: “You’re going to hit the wall big time on power generation. They already are.” The obvious answer is private power plants next to data centers. Musk: “Where do you get the power plants? Where do you get the power plants from?” You cannot will a turbine into existence with venture capital. Every atom on Earth is bound by friction, gravity, and regulation. Most people stare at this wall and see the ceiling on intelligence. They are looking in the wrong direction. In orbit there is no night. No clouds. No seasons. No permitting. No grid. Unfiltered solar energy feeding silicon every hour of every day. Musk: “It’s 10 times cheaper because you don’t need any batteries.” That single number rewrites the entire economics of intelligence. Musk: “The moment your cost of access to space becomes low, by far the cheapest and most scalable way to generate tokens is space.” SpaceX is not a rocket company. It is quietly becoming the most important energy infrastructure play on the planet. Starship is not about Mars. It is about making orbit so cheap that building on the ground becomes the irrational choice. Every major leap in intelligence followed the same pattern. Not a smarter algorithm. A bigger energy source. Fire grew the human brain. Fossil fuels built the computer. The next source isn’t on this planet. The ceiling on intelligence was never artificial. It was always gravitational. The future will not be decided by who builds the best model. It will be decided by who builds the cheapest rocket.

Dustin

50,228 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨ELITES USE THE POWER OF ORGASM THE SUPER WEALTHY DIDN’T USE BUSINESS PLANS TO CREATE WEALTH THEY ACTUALLY USE SPECIFIC ANCIENT RITUALS PASSED DOWN TO CREATE ATTRACTIVE THINGS ESPECIALLY BROUGHT IN WITH WEALTH POWER AND CONTROL Most people waste their orgasmic energy without realizing its full potential. But what if you could harness that raw power and channel it into manifesting wealth and abundance? In this video Tantric practices, Egyptian magic, Hermetic principles, and alchemy speak on how the elites turn orgasm into a magnet for financial success. This isn’t just theory—it’s a proven energetic formula that rewires your reality.
0:55

Sensitive content

🚨ELITES USE THE POWER OF ORGASM THE SUPER WEALTHY DIDN’T USE BUSINESS PLANS TO CREATE WEALTH THEY ACTUALLY USE SPECIFIC ANCIENT RITUALS PASSED DOWN TO CREATE ATTRACTIVE THINGS ESPECIALLY BROUGHT IN WITH WEALTH POWER AND CONTROL Most people waste their orgasmic energy without realizing its full potential. But what if you could harness that raw power and channel it into manifesting wealth and abundance? In this video Tantric practices, Egyptian magic, Hermetic principles, and alchemy speak on how the elites turn orgasm into a magnet for financial success. This isn’t just theory—it’s a proven energetic formula that rewires your reality.

SANTINO

74,684 次观看 • 6 个月前

ELON MUSK: The Future of Energy Is Beyond Earth. "It's increasingly difficult to build power plants on the ground. There are very few people who want a power plant in their backyard, so if we wanted to say double the electricity usage of the United States, which is on average about 500 gigawatts, we would have to build, about twice as many power plants, which I don't think people are, well, most communities are not super excited about that, but actually, if we go to space, we can go far beyond the electricity generation of Earth. In fact, this is going to sound kind of crazy, but you could actually increase harnessed energy by a factor of a million and still be using much less than a millionth of the sun's energy, so current human civilization uses much less than a trillionth of the sun's energy output, which is kind of humbling to think about."
3:06

ELON MUSK: The Future of Energy Is Beyond Earth. "It's increasingly difficult to build power plants on the ground. There are very few people who want a power plant in their backyard, so if we wanted to say double the electricity usage of the United States, which is on average about 500 gigawatts, we would have to build, about twice as many power plants, which I don't think people are, well, most communities are not super excited about that, but actually, if we go to space, we can go far beyond the electricity generation of Earth. In fact, this is going to sound kind of crazy, but you could actually increase harnessed energy by a factor of a million and still be using much less than a millionth of the sun's energy, so current human civilization uses much less than a trillionth of the sun's energy output, which is kind of humbling to think about."

DogeDesigner

1,091,671 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the cheapest place to put AI will be space within 36 months "The availability of energy is the issue. Everywhere outside of China, electrical output is more or less flat. The output of chips is growing exponentially, but the output of electricity is flat" "How are you going to turn the chips on? Magical power sources? Magical electricity fairies?" "Space is really a regulatory play. It's harder to build on land than it is in space. It's harder to scale on the ground than it is to scale in space" "It's always sunny in space. You don't have a day-night cycle, seasonality, clouds, or an atmosphere. The atmosphere alone results in about a 30% loss of energy" "Any given solar panel can do about five times more power in space than on the ground. You also avoid the cost of having batteries to carry you through the night" "My prediction is that it will be by far the cheapest place to put AI. It will be space in 36 months or less. Maybe 30 months" "The only place you can really scale is space. Once you start thinking in terms of what percentage of the Sun's power you are harnessing, you realize you have to go to space" "Solar cells are already farcically cheap. In China they're around 25-30 cents a watt. Now put them in space, and it's not five times cheaper, it's 10 times cheaper because you don't need any batteries" "The moment your cost of access to space becomes low, by far the cheapest and most scalable way to generate tokens is space. It's not even close" "Those who have lived in software land don't realize they're about to have a hard lesson in hardware. It's actually very difficult to build power plants"
8:39

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the cheapest place to put AI will be space within 36 months "The availability of energy is the issue. Everywhere outside of China, electrical output is more or less flat. The output of chips is growing exponentially, but the output of electricity is flat" "How are you going to turn the chips on? Magical power sources? Magical electricity fairies?" "Space is really a regulatory play. It's harder to build on land than it is in space. It's harder to scale on the ground than it is to scale in space" "It's always sunny in space. You don't have a day-night cycle, seasonality, clouds, or an atmosphere. The atmosphere alone results in about a 30% loss of energy" "Any given solar panel can do about five times more power in space than on the ground. You also avoid the cost of having batteries to carry you through the night" "My prediction is that it will be by far the cheapest place to put AI. It will be space in 36 months or less. Maybe 30 months" "The only place you can really scale is space. Once you start thinking in terms of what percentage of the Sun's power you are harnessing, you realize you have to go to space" "Solar cells are already farcically cheap. In China they're around 25-30 cents a watt. Now put them in space, and it's not five times cheaper, it's 10 times cheaper because you don't need any batteries" "The moment your cost of access to space becomes low, by far the cheapest and most scalable way to generate tokens is space. It's not even close" "Those who have lived in software land don't realize they're about to have a hard lesson in hardware. It's actually very difficult to build power plants"

Jaynit

8,361,022 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk just named humanity’s next target, and it makes every energy conversation on Earth instantly obsolete. Kardashev Type II progress. Not science fiction megastructures. One achievable number: capture one millionth of the Sun’s total energy output. Musk: “Our progress toward a Kardashev Type II civilization…” One millionth sounds meaningless. It’s civilization-transforming. That fraction alone delivers 1,000 times more power than Earth could generate by consuming every resource on the planet. Musk: “A reasonable goal would be to try to get to a millionth of the Sun’s energy.” He’s running calculations nobody else considers. Earth intercepts one billionth of solar output. Stay here and that’s the permanent ceiling physics won’t let you break. Move infrastructure to orbit and the ceiling disappears. Musk: “That would be over 10,000 times more energy than all of human civilization uses today.” We’re arguing about grid optimization by percentages. Celebrating 10% efficiency gains. Musk is engineering energy expansion by four orders of magnitude. This is why orbital infrastructure isn’t optional. AI compute scaling on Earth hits power walls before chip walls. The grid collapses before the models do. Space eliminates the constraint. Energy stops being scarce. No night. No weather. No atmosphere bleeding efficiency. Just continuous unfiltered solar radiation forever. Musk: “Let’s have an aspiration.” Stop operating like a species trapped by planetary limits. Start building like one ready to drink directly from stars. The bottleneck choking everything, AI, manufacturing, expansion, isn’t technology. It’s energy access. Answer: move infrastructure to the energy. Build at the source instead of the destination. One millionth of solar output doesn’t improve Earth’s systems. It makes them irrelevant by replacing the fundamental constraint. We’re not launching satellites. We’re relocating civilization’s power foundation to where scarcity becomes physically impossible. From debating grid capacity to accessing energy making those debates look like arguments about candlelight efficiency. This is what leaving Type I looks like. Not theory. Active engineering with concrete deployment windows. And once we tap even that tiny fraction of stellar output, every limitation we currently accept as reality, energy costs, compute ceilings, manufacturing constraints, becomes a choice we made to stay small, not physics forcing us to stop. The future isn’t optimizing what we have on Earth. It’s abandoning Earth’s limits entirely and building where the actual power is.
1:36

Elon Musk just named humanity’s next target, and it makes every energy conversation on Earth instantly obsolete. Kardashev Type II progress. Not science fiction megastructures. One achievable number: capture one millionth of the Sun’s total energy output. Musk: “Our progress toward a Kardashev Type II civilization…” One millionth sounds meaningless. It’s civilization-transforming. That fraction alone delivers 1,000 times more power than Earth could generate by consuming every resource on the planet. Musk: “A reasonable goal would be to try to get to a millionth of the Sun’s energy.” He’s running calculations nobody else considers. Earth intercepts one billionth of solar output. Stay here and that’s the permanent ceiling physics won’t let you break. Move infrastructure to orbit and the ceiling disappears. Musk: “That would be over 10,000 times more energy than all of human civilization uses today.” We’re arguing about grid optimization by percentages. Celebrating 10% efficiency gains. Musk is engineering energy expansion by four orders of magnitude. This is why orbital infrastructure isn’t optional. AI compute scaling on Earth hits power walls before chip walls. The grid collapses before the models do. Space eliminates the constraint. Energy stops being scarce. No night. No weather. No atmosphere bleeding efficiency. Just continuous unfiltered solar radiation forever. Musk: “Let’s have an aspiration.” Stop operating like a species trapped by planetary limits. Start building like one ready to drink directly from stars. The bottleneck choking everything, AI, manufacturing, expansion, isn’t technology. It’s energy access. Answer: move infrastructure to the energy. Build at the source instead of the destination. One millionth of solar output doesn’t improve Earth’s systems. It makes them irrelevant by replacing the fundamental constraint. We’re not launching satellites. We’re relocating civilization’s power foundation to where scarcity becomes physically impossible. From debating grid capacity to accessing energy making those debates look like arguments about candlelight efficiency. This is what leaving Type I looks like. Not theory. Active engineering with concrete deployment windows. And once we tap even that tiny fraction of stellar output, every limitation we currently accept as reality, energy costs, compute ceilings, manufacturing constraints, becomes a choice we made to stay small, not physics forcing us to stop. The future isn’t optimizing what we have on Earth. It’s abandoning Earth’s limits entirely and building where the actual power is.

Dustin

21,915 次观看 • 6 个月前

RFK Jr. VP candidate Nicole Shanahan: The Democratic Party lacks “thoughtfulness and integrity” in its environmental agenda “The Democratic Party has done some really stupid things as it defines what climate change projects should be” “I don’t think anyone in their right mind, when they even spend 30 minutes looking at the issues that some of these clean energy projects have created environmentally, could continue to agree with that course of action” “They continue to ignore the environment, human health and wellness, natural systems and ecosystems, and are rushing to erect these energy projects that have proven time and time again to cause ecological waste. Toxins spewing into the environment from the entire supply chain, lack of investment in alternatives like sodium-ion batteries. Sodium-ion batteries could be phenomenally transformative, and we’ve not talked about it at all in the United States. If you talk to any of these clean energy experts and you present to them sodium-ion batteries as a competitor to lithium-ion batteries, none of them will be able to speak intelligently about either category. It just makes you wonder, what the hell is going on?” From the Back to the People podcast
1:42

RFK Jr. VP candidate Nicole Shanahan: The Democratic Party lacks “thoughtfulness and integrity” in its environmental agenda “The Democratic Party has done some really stupid things as it defines what climate change projects should be” “I don’t think anyone in their right mind, when they even spend 30 minutes looking at the issues that some of these clean energy projects have created environmentally, could continue to agree with that course of action” “They continue to ignore the environment, human health and wellness, natural systems and ecosystems, and are rushing to erect these energy projects that have proven time and time again to cause ecological waste. Toxins spewing into the environment from the entire supply chain, lack of investment in alternatives like sodium-ion batteries. Sodium-ion batteries could be phenomenally transformative, and we’ve not talked about it at all in the United States. If you talk to any of these clean energy experts and you present to them sodium-ion batteries as a competitor to lithium-ion batteries, none of them will be able to speak intelligently about either category. It just makes you wonder, what the hell is going on?” From the Back to the People podcast

Holden Culotta

39,953 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk just exposed the most catastrophic energy blindspot in the entire AI arms race. The West is still debating which twigs to burn. China is capturing the sun. Musk: “People just don’t understand how solar is everything. Compared to the sun, all other energy sources are like cavemen throwing some twigs into a fire.” Every natural gas plant. Every nuclear reactor. Every experimental fusion project being debated in Washington right now. Twigs. Musk: “We have a giant free fusion reactor that shows up every day. It’s farcical for us to create little fusion reactors.” And then he gave the most clarifying statistic in the entire energy debate. Musk: “The sun is over 99.8% of all mass in the solar system. Jupiter is around 0.1%. So even if you burnt Jupiter, the energy produced by the sun would still round up to 100%.” Musk: “And then if you teleported three more Jupiters into our solar system and burnt them too, it would still round up.” The sun is not an energy source. It is the only energy source. Everything else is rounding error. China already knows this. While American tech executives beg for permits to build natural gas plants, China crossed 1,000 gigawatts of installed solar capacity in 2025. More than the rest of the world combined. They are not holding summits about it. They are not commissioning reports about it. They are building it. Harvesting the free fusion reactor that arrives every morning at zero cost and feeding it directly into their AI data centers. The AI race is not an algorithm race. It is an electro-industrial race. You cannot build superintelligence without infinite compute. You cannot have infinite compute without infinite energy. And right now, the United States is losing the energy war while holding committee meetings about which twigs to burn next. China built the energy-compute flywheel. Cheap, scalable, infinite solar power feeding AI models at a fraction of the cost. Compounding every single day. The nation that captures the sun’s output will hold a permanent monopoly on global intelligence. The nation that doesn’t will spend the next decade trying to understand how it lost. Everyone else gets left holding the twigs.
1:39

Elon Musk just exposed the most catastrophic energy blindspot in the entire AI arms race. The West is still debating which twigs to burn. China is capturing the sun. Musk: “People just don’t understand how solar is everything. Compared to the sun, all other energy sources are like cavemen throwing some twigs into a fire.” Every natural gas plant. Every nuclear reactor. Every experimental fusion project being debated in Washington right now. Twigs. Musk: “We have a giant free fusion reactor that shows up every day. It’s farcical for us to create little fusion reactors.” And then he gave the most clarifying statistic in the entire energy debate. Musk: “The sun is over 99.8% of all mass in the solar system. Jupiter is around 0.1%. So even if you burnt Jupiter, the energy produced by the sun would still round up to 100%.” Musk: “And then if you teleported three more Jupiters into our solar system and burnt them too, it would still round up.” The sun is not an energy source. It is the only energy source. Everything else is rounding error. China already knows this. While American tech executives beg for permits to build natural gas plants, China crossed 1,000 gigawatts of installed solar capacity in 2025. More than the rest of the world combined. They are not holding summits about it. They are not commissioning reports about it. They are building it. Harvesting the free fusion reactor that arrives every morning at zero cost and feeding it directly into their AI data centers. The AI race is not an algorithm race. It is an electro-industrial race. You cannot build superintelligence without infinite compute. You cannot have infinite compute without infinite energy. And right now, the United States is losing the energy war while holding committee meetings about which twigs to burn next. China built the energy-compute flywheel. Cheap, scalable, infinite solar power feeding AI models at a fraction of the cost. Compounding every single day. The nation that captures the sun’s output will hold a permanent monopoly on global intelligence. The nation that doesn’t will spend the next decade trying to understand how it lost. Everyone else gets left holding the twigs.

Dustin

47,059 次观看 • 5 个月前

ELON MUSK ON WHY SPACE SOLAR IS ESSENTIAL FOR KARDASHEV PROGRESS “To make any progress on a Kardashev 2 scale… you really have to have your solar power in deep space.” These late 2025 comments remain central as AI energy demands grow and orbital deployments advance into 2026. He notes Earth receives only a tiny fraction of the Sun’s output, limiting terrestrial scaling. Space allows access to vastly more continuous energy without atmospheric losses. Why it matters: This frames energy constraints not as limits but as incentives to expand off-planet, enabling meaningful steps toward stellar-scale utilization. Source: Elon Musk on X, November 2025 — Topic: AI Scaling and Kardashev Framework
0:48

ELON MUSK ON WHY SPACE SOLAR IS ESSENTIAL FOR KARDASHEV PROGRESS “To make any progress on a Kardashev 2 scale… you really have to have your solar power in deep space.” These late 2025 comments remain central as AI energy demands grow and orbital deployments advance into 2026. He notes Earth receives only a tiny fraction of the Sun’s output, limiting terrestrial scaling. Space allows access to vastly more continuous energy without atmospheric losses. Why it matters: This frames energy constraints not as limits but as incentives to expand off-planet, enabling meaningful steps toward stellar-scale utilization. Source: Elon Musk on X, November 2025 — Topic: AI Scaling and Kardashev Framework

Lacey

1,471,166 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk: The real bottleneck for AI is not chips, it is electricity. “If you look at electrical output outside of China, everywhere outside of China, it’s more or less flat. It’s maybe a slight increase, but pretty close flat. China has a rapid increase in electrical output. But if you’re putting data centers anywhere except China, where are you going to get your electricity? Especially as you scale. The output of chips is growing pretty much exponentially, but the output of electricity is flat. So how are you going to turn the chips on? Magical power sources? Magical electricity fairies? It’s harder to build on land than it is in space. It’s harder to scale on the ground than it is to scale in space. But also, you’re going to get about 5 times the effectiveness of solar panels in space versus the ground, and you don’t need batteries. I almost wore my other shirt, which says it’s always sunny in space because you don’t have a day-night cycle or seasonality, clouds, or an atmosphere in space. The atmosphere alone results in about a 30% loss of energy. So, any given solar panels can do about 5 times more power in space than on the ground, and you avoid the cost of having batteries to carry you through the night. So it’s actually much cheaper to do it in space. And my prediction is that it will be by far the cheapest place to put AI. It will be space in 36 months or less, maybe 30 months.” Dwarkesh Podcast, February 5, 2026.
2:19

Elon Musk: The real bottleneck for AI is not chips, it is electricity. “If you look at electrical output outside of China, everywhere outside of China, it’s more or less flat. It’s maybe a slight increase, but pretty close flat. China has a rapid increase in electrical output. But if you’re putting data centers anywhere except China, where are you going to get your electricity? Especially as you scale. The output of chips is growing pretty much exponentially, but the output of electricity is flat. So how are you going to turn the chips on? Magical power sources? Magical electricity fairies? It’s harder to build on land than it is in space. It’s harder to scale on the ground than it is to scale in space. But also, you’re going to get about 5 times the effectiveness of solar panels in space versus the ground, and you don’t need batteries. I almost wore my other shirt, which says it’s always sunny in space because you don’t have a day-night cycle or seasonality, clouds, or an atmosphere in space. The atmosphere alone results in about a 30% loss of energy. So, any given solar panels can do about 5 times more power in space than on the ground, and you avoid the cost of having batteries to carry you through the night. So it’s actually much cheaper to do it in space. And my prediction is that it will be by far the cheapest place to put AI. It will be space in 36 months or less, maybe 30 months.” Dwarkesh Podcast, February 5, 2026.

ELON CLIPS

65,484 次观看 • 1 个月前

How science works according to Nobel Prize winner Thomas Südhof: Very often, politicians think that you can tell scientists what they’re supposed to discover. You can’t! Scientists don’t know what they are going to discover. They have to try things. They have to have curiosity and ideas, but they also have to have the knowledge to try things. Very often, it leads to nothing; it’s a waste. But we didn’t know when we started it’s a waste. But when something does work. When something clicks, it is exciting and rewarding but it’s never just one click. You get a result on it, you’re hopeful, you build on it. Maybe it’s confirmed you’re even more hopeful. So it’s an incremental process. It is never one thing - boom we discovered a major thing, my god this is it. It is more like walking up a flight of stairs where each step counts and the higher up the stairs you go the better you can see what’s on top and become excited about what’s there and how you can use.
1:07

How science works according to Nobel Prize winner Thomas Südhof: Very often, politicians think that you can tell scientists what they’re supposed to discover. You can’t! Scientists don’t know what they are going to discover. They have to try things. They have to have curiosity and ideas, but they also have to have the knowledge to try things. Very often, it leads to nothing; it’s a waste. But we didn’t know when we started it’s a waste. But when something does work. When something clicks, it is exciting and rewarding but it’s never just one click. You get a result on it, you’re hopeful, you build on it. Maybe it’s confirmed you’re even more hopeful. So it’s an incremental process. It is never one thing - boom we discovered a major thing, my god this is it. It is more like walking up a flight of stairs where each step counts and the higher up the stairs you go the better you can see what’s on top and become excited about what’s there and how you can use.

Itai Yanai

36,558 次观看 • 1 个月前

What actually goes into a data center? Guru Chahal🇺🇸 whiteboards the entire stack - across land, power, cooling, storage, networking, compute - and shares where we're seeing the most interesting innovation + startup opportunities → Base Power: virtual power plants from residential batteries → Periodic Labs: using AI to discover new materials - ones that run cooler, conduct better, and waste less power → Nexthop AI: network switches that are 10–15% more power efficient than what's on the market → Unconventional AI: AI chips modeled after how the human brain works, targeting 100–1,000x better power efficiency → Ricursive Intelligence: AI to design chips. Today a first chip costs $100M and takes 2–3 years. They want to build in months, at a fraction of the cost → better materials → cheaper experiments → more chip designs → more efficient chips → less power → and what happens when you package all of this into a satellite and put it in orbit 🚀 As trillions of dollars of infrastructure flow into building the "AI factory", every layer of the intelligence economy is being rebuilt at once. Who are we missing? We'd love to meet if you are building somewhere on this stack.
11:20

What actually goes into a data center? Guru Chahal🇺🇸 whiteboards the entire stack - across land, power, cooling, storage, networking, compute - and shares where we're seeing the most interesting innovation + startup opportunities → Base Power: virtual power plants from residential batteries → Periodic Labs: using AI to discover new materials - ones that run cooler, conduct better, and waste less power → Nexthop AI: network switches that are 10–15% more power efficient than what's on the market → Unconventional AI: AI chips modeled after how the human brain works, targeting 100–1,000x better power efficiency → Ricursive Intelligence: AI to design chips. Today a first chip costs $100M and takes 2–3 years. They want to build in months, at a fraction of the cost → better materials → cheaper experiments → more chip designs → more efficient chips → less power → and what happens when you package all of this into a satellite and put it in orbit 🚀 As trillions of dollars of infrastructure flow into building the "AI factory", every layer of the intelligence economy is being rebuilt at once. Who are we missing? We'd love to meet if you are building somewhere on this stack.

Claire Zau

41,288 次观看 • 21 天前