Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Elon Musk says one heat shield problem could kill Starship's reusability for years. Starship is the most complicated machine humans have ever built. The hardest part isn't the engines. It isn't the steel. It isn't even the explosion margin on liftoff. Musk named the one remaining bottleneck. "It's having...

636,437 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

35 Kommentare

Profilbild von Elon Musk
Elon Muskvor 4 Monaten

High-cycle, reliable engine reflight without replacement, refurbishment or laborious inspection is about the same degree of difficulty as a rapidly reusable heat shield. And then there are thousands of smaller challenges throughout the primary structure. This is a crazy hard problem.

Profilbild von Homer Hickam
Homer Hickamvor 4 Monaten

Maybe it would be cheaper to figure out how to slow the vehicle down to subsonic before crashing into the atmosphere at orbital velocity. I don't have that solution but I bet there's one out there.

Profilbild von Fresch
Freschvor 4 Monaten

Rather than tiles, try a pearlite silica based spray on surface. Something like a lightweight pool marcite or spraycrete. Sprayon before launch, scrape off after landing, grind it up, and spray on again for next launch.

Profilbild von GeniusThinking
GeniusThinkingvor 4 Monaten

P.S. If you want to support us to keep our content free and accessible... Grab a free copy of our 100+ best mental models, cognitive biases, and fallacies below. The Ultimate Mental Models Playbook ❤️

Profilbild von Anton Lazutkin
Anton Lazutkinvor 4 Monaten

@grok pls can you compare "Starship is the most complicated machine humans have ever built." to one human cell? what is more "complicated" and pls compare it in words we could understand.

Profilbild von Buddy
Buddyvor 4 Monaten

Instead of consuming heat it needs to repel it. Frequency(sound) can put out a fire. It should also be able to repel heat.

Profilbild von Dr. Jeremiah Scholl B.Sc., Lic., Ph.D.
Dr. Jeremiah Scholl B.Sc., Lic., Ph.D.vor 4 Monaten

Why couldn’t robots do the inspection in an hour or so? Just a bunch of drones flying around the ship with special equipment.

Profilbild von Charlie Camarda PhD
Charlie Camarda PhDvor 4 Monaten

Tell him to give me a call.

Profilbild von C and J Images
C and J Imagesvor 4 Monaten

The problem is simple, the solution not so simple. Either create a Reusable heat shield(do the materials exist today) or create an easily replaceable shield or.. and this is outside of my knowledge. Is there a way to slowly Deorbit a ship without the extreme heat

Profilbild von Joel O’Bryan
Joel O’Bryanvor 4 Monaten

Well I disagree that Starship is the most complex machine humans have ever built. That prize currently goes to ASML Holding N.V. It is the Dutch company, and the only company in the world, that designs and manufactures extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines used to produce advanced semiconductor wafers. Operationalized, volume production-capable EUV lithography at 13.5 micron beam wavelength is the confluence of so many advanced physics innovations, patented and proprietary, that it is an amazing creation.

Profilbild von Blueblaze
Blueblazevor 4 Monaten

NO heat shield is the key to re usability. The solution is access to enough energy to slow from orbital speed to MACH 2 BEFORE entering the atmosphere. Reusability will never be achieved so long as going to space is a death-defying stunt.

Profilbild von Dustin Burnham
Dustin Burnhamvor 4 Monaten

So rebuilding the heat shield is the biggest bottleneck I didn’t realize that. I wonder if 3D printing like the kind @RocketLab is doing has a role here

Profilbild von CoolGuy400
CoolGuy400vor 4 Monaten

If anyone can solve it, it is Elon and his team. They figured out how to create an Aluminum alloy that does not fatigue fracture from cyclic loads. Now in 1978, that was not considered possible at all. Heat shield - going to have to create a new alloy that can withstand the temperatures of reentry. Ceramic/Glass does not seem to be the solution as it is not robust enough. Part of the solution perhaps.

Profilbild von 3DawgKnight
3DawgKnightvor 4 Monaten

graphene should take care of that....

Profilbild von km2020
km2020vor 4 Monaten

What could be used to expand the crushed air in front of the falling object instead of protecting it from the heat? Perhaps Moses’ staff and focused intention to “part the seas” as it were? Instead of attached to the ship, conditions applied from outside the ship sourced from space or grounded on Earth? More musing required on this.

Profilbild von Wizard of Time & Speed
Wizard of Time & Speedvor 4 Monaten

@grok Which is more complex: Starship or the Hedron Collider?

Profilbild von KissMyWhip
KissMyWhipvor 4 Monaten

No it's not, the Hadron collider or I.T.E.R currently being built pisses all over your little chemical rocket. Get a grip sometimes your so full of shit 🤣

Profilbild von Rick Kuehn
Rick Kuehnvor 4 Monaten

Springtime is my favorite season of the year!

Profilbild von brandon44👑🦁
brandon44👑🦁vor 4 Monaten

@ManuLionCrypto Agreed. It’s a difficult item to design. I think the shield should be either self repairing or actually self replacing. Difficult yes but impossible no

Profilbild von andy flower
andy flowervor 4 Monaten

-heatshield structure has to be secured with elastic some with... -reusable or remade..

Profilbild von B. Sides
B. Sidesvor 4 Monaten

Ok. So make a spray on that hardens. Use a polymer that conducts no heat and can handle the vibration and friction. Becomes solid and expands when not under pressure and you can carry several canisters aboard for emergency repairs. Now have a quantum Ai create it.

Profilbild von T.B.R - Group Captain Lionel Mandrake
T.B.R - Group Captain Lionel Mandrakevor 4 Monaten

No one has made a reusable heatshield? Umm,

Profilbild von Space Universe
Space Universevor 4 Monaten

People see Starship explosions and think the challenge is simply “making a rocket work.” But the real breakthrough SpaceX is chasing is airline-like reusability at orbital scale. Launching to orbit is already hard. Returning safely is harder. Doing it rapidly, repeatedly, cheaply, with minimal inspection between flights has never been achieved in human history. That’s why the heat shield matters so much. A truly reusable orbital heat shield is one of the final missing technologies needed to make Mars transportation economically possible at scale 🚀

Profilbild von Professor Ratchet
Professor Ratchetvor 4 Monaten

Ok follow me here - you launch starship naked and fabricate shield tiles on the moon. You pick up an extra few tons of payload capacity which is nothing to sneeze at. Can be that much harder than orbital data centers.

Profilbild von HWG
HWGvor 4 Monaten

What about truck spray on bed liner material ??? It seems to survive nearly anything !!! But these ships are not airliners … you will never see a one- or single-day turnaround time …

Profilbild von James Hays
James Haysvor 4 Monaten

It’s too bad we haven’t yet discovered a way to capture all that dispensed energy on reentry for relaunch.

Profilbild von Rick Smith
Rick Smithvor 4 Monaten

Heat shield failure has resulted in the death of more than one astronaut. Increase reliability and survivability as simply as possible. I for one wouldn’t bet against SpaceX succeeding in that effort.

Profilbild von Flyingillini
Flyingillinivor 4 Monaten

Why can’t they cache fuel in orbit and use that fuel to slow Starship using re-entry burns ? Then land it like the boosters.

Profilbild von Elena Mikhailovna
Elena Mikhailovnavor 4 Monaten

Если вы потеряли обшивку,часть плитки во время полета,может имеет смысл рассмотреть другой материал обшивки-более легкий, цельный,обхватывающий ракету более плотно,обволакивающий по максимуму,но одновременно выдерживающий большие температуры.Например,силикон.Или что-то подобное.

Profilbild von plumber Tadd
plumber Taddvor 4 Monaten

Well, hopefully XAI comes up with new material soon. Just have Optimus inspect tiles all day long 😁

Profilbild von upcountrywater
upcountrywatervor 4 Monaten

You can have reusable tiles. ~ The thickness and weight, will eat up the payload. ~ Auto brake pads are more than a few mm thick.

Profilbild von Reid
Reidvor 4 Monaten

Liquid cooled heat shield? More complexity but maybe higher reliability

Profilbild von Government Sucks 🇺🇸 🐊
Government Sucks 🇺🇸 🐊vor 4 Monaten

Surely a circular laser device could inspect the craft for missing tiles or tiles with excessive scorch marks. Shouldn’t take that long. Haste makes waste.

Profilbild von 321TEM
321TEMvor 4 Monaten

Would it make safety and economic sense to add extra fuel and utilized braking thrusters to minimize de-orbit velocity?

Profilbild von Damtew Kebede
Damtew Kebedevor 4 Monaten

👍

Ähnliche Videos

Elon Musk says Tesla swallows 1.5 GB of video into 2 KB of control. "We really are photons in, controls out. That is the vast majority of your life: vision, photons in, and then motor controls out." Musk reduced the human nervous system to a single equation. That theory runs in every Tesla on the road. "Your Tesla is taking in one and a half gigabytes a second of video and outputting two kilobytes a second of control outputs with the video at 36 hertz and the control frequency at 18." A 750,000-to-1 compression ratio. The car decides which photons matter. "You don't care about the details of the leaves on the tree on the side of the road, but you care a lot about the road signs and the traffic lights, the pedestrians, and even whether someone in another car is looking at you or not looking at you." Then Musk extended the equation past Tesla. The same architecture runs Optimus. **Photons in. Controls out.** Different number of degrees of freedom. A car has steering and acceleration. A robot arm has dozens of joints. Same compression. More fingers on the other side. Musk, who built one Tesla AI engine across two products: "AI is mostly compression and correlation of two bitstreams." The implication: a human, a Tesla, and an Optimus all run the same loop. Musk, looking back at the human equation: "This is what happens with humans." If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I made a playbook breaking down 100+ mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Comment "MODELS" + Follow GeniusThinking and I'll send it to you. — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

161,057 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk says five-year deadlines gut every project before the work starts. Project schedules grow. Musk doesn't let them. He named the law nobody else does. "There is a law of gas expansion that applies to schedules." Then the consequence. "If you said we're going to do something in five years, which to me is like infinity time, it will expand to fill the available schedule and it'll take five years." Five years is infinity time. The fix is the deadline you'd never agree to. "I generally actually try to aim for a deadline that I at least think is at the 50th percentile." A deadline missed half the time on purpose. Musk, on what 50th percentile means: "It's the most aggressive deadline I can think of that could be achieved with 50% probability." Half the schedule slips. The other half ships impossible. Musk's whole operating system runs on it. "I have a maniacal sense of urgency. So that maniacal sense of urgency projects through the rest of the company." The urgency is not pressure. It is gas pressure. Without it, the project fills the room you give it. Musk, on what he's actually optimizing: "I'm constantly addressing the limiting factor." The limiting factor is rarely the work. It is the schedule. If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

210,489 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Musk says the simulation hypothesis is almost certainly TRUE since 2016. And this is also why he renamed Twitter to X. This is hella interesting, watch this clip and lemme explain... Elon founded xAI on the mission of understanding the universe. The thesis traces back to a Darwinian thought experiment. "Like in this version of reality, in this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it." Boring simulations got cancelled. Interesting ones got renewed. Then, he said, the corollary appeared. "They particularly seem to like interesting outcomes that are ironic." The simulation, in Musk's frame, didn't just keep stories alive — it actively preferred the ones that flipped on themselves, the ones where the noun and the truth ran in opposite directions. He pointed at the names of AI companies and read them off one by one. - OpenAI is closed. - Midjourney is not mid. - Stability AI is unstable. - Anthropic is misanthropic. Four labs. Four nouns. Four ironic reversals. Each picked a name with a clean flip available. The simulation took every one. Musk, who had named X for that exact reason, dodged the trick. "It's a name that you can't invert, really. It's hard to say, what is the ironic version?" He called it an irony shield. No opposite. No mirror. No clean flip. Musk, on the bet underneath the joke: "It's, I think, a largely irony-proof name. By design." Watch the video to hear Elon explains it: If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

34,019 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the **cryogenic stainless flip**. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I've made a free playbook on how to use and create your own mental models. This includes the same thinking strategies Feynman, Munger, and Musk built their careers on. Ttrusted by 5,000+ founders and investors. Grab your copy: — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

829,800 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Musk says the simulation hypothesis is almost certainly true since 2016. And this is also why he renamed Twitter to X... Elon founded xAI on the mission of understanding the universe. He renamed Twitter to X in 2023, picking the only letter without an opposite. The thesis traces back to a Darwinian thought experiment. "Like in this version of reality, in this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it." Boring simulations got cancelled. Interesting ones got renewed. Then, he said, the corollary appeared. "They particularly seem to like interesting outcomes that are ironic." The simulation, in Musk's frame, didn't just keep stories alive — it actively preferred the ones that flipped on themselves, the ones where the noun and the truth ran in opposite directions. He pointed at the names of AI companies and read them off one by one. - OpenAI is closed. - Midjourney is not mid. - Stability AI is unstable. - Anthropic is misanthropic. Four labs. Four nouns. Four ironic reversals. Each picked a name with a clean flip available. The simulation took every one. Musk, who had named X for that exact reason, dodged the trick. "It's a name that you can't invert, really. It's hard to say, what is the ironic version?" He called it an irony shield. No opposite. No mirror. No clean flip. Musk, on the bet underneath the joke: "It's, I think, a largely irony-proof name. By design." P.S. I made a playbook breaking down 100+ most powerful decision making mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Grab a free copy here: If you're new here, follow GeniusThinking for content on the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. — Elon Musk ( Elon Musk ), CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's ( Dwarkesh Patel ) podcast

GeniusThinking

20,844 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Elon Musk says steel killed carbon fiber on Starship at one-fiftieth the cost. Carbon fiber was supposed to be the future of rocketry. Lighter than aluminum. Stronger than steel. Trusted by every Formula 1 team. SpaceX picked it for Starship. "Particularly if you go for a high-strength specialized carbon fiber that can handle cryogenic oxygen, it's roughly 50 times the cost of steel." Then progress stalled. The autoclaves needed to cure the resin had to outsize every autoclave on Earth, and the team couldn't even produce a clean barrel section without wrinkles. Musk, watching the Mars timeline slip: "At this rate, we're never going to get to Mars. So we've got to think of something else." So he asked the question nobody at SpaceX had asked: "What about steel?" It became known as the cryogenic stainless flip. Musk, who had already shipped Falcon 9 in aluminum-lithium, broke with the textbook. "When you look at the material properties of stainless steel, full-hard, strain hardened stainless steel, at cryogenic temperature the strength to weight is actually similar to carbon fiber." Starship ran on cryogenic methane and oxygen. The airframe lived at temperatures that flipped steel ahead of carbon fiber. "You could smoke a cigar while welding stainless steel." After Musk made the call, steel weighed less than the carbon fiber version. Fifty times cheaper in raw material. Twice the heat tolerance. Half the heat shield mass. Musk, looking back: "In retrospect, we should have started with steel in the beginning. It was dumb not to do steel." What "obvious" material in your work is silently costing you the project? — Elon Musk (.Elon Musk , CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, on Dwarkesh Patel's (.Dwarkesh Patel) podcast

GeniusThinking

335,307 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen