正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Elon Musk's Elon Musk Five Step Improvement Process: 1. First, make your requirements less dumb. 2. Try very hard to delete the part of the process. 3. Only the third step is to simplify or optimize. 4. Accelerate cycle time. 5. Automate "Everyone's wrong. No matter who you are.... show more

Colene Copeland-Kruszynski👾

5,547 subscribers

12,008 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Elon Musk explains the 5-step process he tries to implement in his companies to ensure efficient engineering: 1. Make your requirements less dumb 2. Try very hard to delete parts or processes 3. Simplify/optimize 4. Accelerate cycle time 5. Automate Elon Musk Everyday Astronaut

Elon Musk explains the 5-step process he tries to implement in his companies to ensure efficient engineering: 1. Make your requirements less dumb 2. Try very hard to delete parts or processes 3. Simplify/optimize 4. Accelerate cycle time 5. Automate Elon Musk Everyday Astronaut

ELON CLIPS

120,886 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist.

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist.

ELON CLIPS

887,796 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Everyone's been trained in high school and college to answer the question. Convergent logic. You can't tell the professor your question is dumb, or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So, everyone basically, without knowing it, got mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, 2021

Elon Musk: The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Why would people do that? Everyone's been trained in high school and college to answer the question. Convergent logic. You can't tell the professor your question is dumb, or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So, everyone basically, without knowing it, got mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.” Starbase Tour with Everyday Astronaut, 2021

ELON CLIPS

298,650 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk’s Elon Musk first principles algorithm: “Well, it's easy to say simplify and it's very difficult to do it. You know, I have this very basic first principles algorithm that I run kind of as a mantra, which is to first question the requirements, make the requirements less dumb. The requirements are always dumb to some degree, so you want to start off by reducing the number of requirements. And no matter how smart the person who gave you those requirements, they're still dumb to some degree. You have to start there because otherwise you could get the perfect answer to the wrong question. So try to make the question the least wrong possible. That's what question the requirements means. And then the second thing is to try to delete whatever the step is, the part, or the process step. It sounds very obvious, but people often forget to try deleting it entirely. And if you're not forced to put back at least 10% of what you delete, you're not deleting enough. And it's somewhat illogical, people often, most of the time, feel as though they've succeeded if they've not been forced to put things back in. But actually, they haven't because they've been overly conservative and have left things in there that shouldn't be. And only the third thing is to try to optimize it or simplify it. Again, these all sound, I think, very obvious when I say them, but the number of times I've made these mistakes is more than I care to remember. That's why I have this mantra. So in fact, I'd say the most common mistake of smart engineers is to optimize a thing that should not exist.”

Elon Musk’s Elon Musk first principles algorithm: “Well, it's easy to say simplify and it's very difficult to do it. You know, I have this very basic first principles algorithm that I run kind of as a mantra, which is to first question the requirements, make the requirements less dumb. The requirements are always dumb to some degree, so you want to start off by reducing the number of requirements. And no matter how smart the person who gave you those requirements, they're still dumb to some degree. You have to start there because otherwise you could get the perfect answer to the wrong question. So try to make the question the least wrong possible. That's what question the requirements means. And then the second thing is to try to delete whatever the step is, the part, or the process step. It sounds very obvious, but people often forget to try deleting it entirely. And if you're not forced to put back at least 10% of what you delete, you're not deleting enough. And it's somewhat illogical, people often, most of the time, feel as though they've succeeded if they've not been forced to put things back in. But actually, they haven't because they've been overly conservative and have left things in there that shouldn't be. And only the third thing is to try to optimize it or simplify it. Again, these all sound, I think, very obvious when I say them, but the number of times I've made these mistakes is more than I care to remember. That's why I have this mantra. So in fact, I'd say the most common mistake of smart engineers is to optimize a thing that should not exist.”

Beanie👾

271,244 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon's Algorithm: 1. Make Requirements Less Dumb 2. Delete the Part or Process Step 3. Optimize 4. Accelerate 5. Automate "The Algorithm is a five step process that [Elon] installs at all his companies — it's his method for breaking bottlenecks. It starts by questioning the requirements. Question every requirement. It doesn't matter how smart the person is. Accept no requirements from departments, they must have a human name attached to them. The second step is to delete and simplify. Delete anything you possibly can. The most useful heuristic is you have to over-delete. If you aren't adding back at least 10% of what you deleted then you haven't been deleting enough. The reason to simplify is that you get both reliability and low cost. You want fewer parts and fewer lines of code. Complexity is recursive...each additional element causes more complexity and more work. Those first two steps carry 80% of the weight. Number three is optimize which is typical engineering work. The forth is accelerate which is just...go faster. And the fifth is automate. The problem is almost everybody does these five steps in reverse order."

Elon's Algorithm: 1. Make Requirements Less Dumb 2. Delete the Part or Process Step 3. Optimize 4. Accelerate 5. Automate "The Algorithm is a five step process that [Elon] installs at all his companies — it's his method for breaking bottlenecks. It starts by questioning the requirements. Question every requirement. It doesn't matter how smart the person is. Accept no requirements from departments, they must have a human name attached to them. The second step is to delete and simplify. Delete anything you possibly can. The most useful heuristic is you have to over-delete. If you aren't adding back at least 10% of what you deleted then you haven't been deleting enough. The reason to simplify is that you get both reliability and low cost. You want fewer parts and fewer lines of code. Complexity is recursive...each additional element causes more complexity and more work. Those first two steps carry 80% of the weight. Number three is optimize which is typical engineering work. The forth is accelerate which is just...go faster. And the fifth is automate. The problem is almost everybody does these five steps in reverse order."

Ti Morse

40,518 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk explains his 5-step process for running companies: "First, make your requirements less dumb. Your requirements are definitely dumb. It does not matter who gave them to you. It's particularly dangerous if a smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough. Everyone's wrong no matter who you are. Everyone's wrong some of the time. So make your requirements less dumb. Then try very hard to delete the part or process. This is actually very important. If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you are not deleting enough. The bias tends to be very strongly towards let's add this part or process step in case we need it. But you can basically make in-case arguments for so many things and for a rocket that is trying to be the first fully reusable rocket. There's never been a fully reusable rocket. People don't understand. This is like the holy grail of rocketry. So you've got to delete the part or process step. Super important. You can't hedge your bets. That's why the grid funds, for example, do not fall down because that's a whole extra mechanism that we don't need. Also, whatever requirement or constraint you have, it must come with a name, not a department. Because you can't ask the department. You have to ask a person. That person who's putting forward their requirement or constraint must agree that they must take responsibility for that requirement. Otherwise, you can have a requirement that basically an intern two years ago randomly came up with off the cuff and they're not even at the company anymore. These things are often just way more silly than you think. So step one, make your requirements less dumb. Step two, delete the part or process step. If you're not adding things back in 10% of the time, you're clearly not deleting enough. And then only the third step is simplify or optimize. The third step, not the first step. The reason it's the third step is because possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Everyone's been trained in high school and college that you've got to answer the question. Convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb. You'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically, without knowing it, they've got a mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist. And then finally, you get to step four, which is accelerate cycle time. You're moving too slowly, go faster. But don't go faster until you have worked on the other three things first. You can always make things go faster. And then the final step is automate. Now, I've personally made the mistake of going backwards on all five steps multiple times. Literally, I automated, accelerated, simplified, and then deleted. One example I've talked about before is there were these fiberglass mats on top of the Model 3 battery pack that were in between the floor pan and the battery. And it was at one point choking the battery pack production line. And I was basically living on the battery pack production line trying to fix the line. It was choking the entire Model 3 production program. So the first mistake was I tried to fix the automation, like make the robot better. So automating was a mistake. Then accelerating was a mistake. Then optimizing was a mistake. And finally, I said, what the hell are these mats for? And I asked the battery safety team, what are these mats for? Are they for fire protection or something? They said, no, they're for noise and vibration. Then I asked an NVH, a noise, vibration, harshness team, what's it for? They said fire safety. So literally, it was like being in a Dilbert cartoon. Actually, I feel like I'm in a Dilbert cartoon quite frequently. So then finally, OK, great, let's try a car with the fiberglass mats and without. And they put a microphone to both and see if you can tell the difference. In fact, I was like, which one is which? So we just deleted them and just bypassed this $2 million robot cell. It was just a complete pile of nonsense."

Elon Musk explains his 5-step process for running companies: "First, make your requirements less dumb. Your requirements are definitely dumb. It does not matter who gave them to you. It's particularly dangerous if a smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough. Everyone's wrong no matter who you are. Everyone's wrong some of the time. So make your requirements less dumb. Then try very hard to delete the part or process. This is actually very important. If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you are not deleting enough. The bias tends to be very strongly towards let's add this part or process step in case we need it. But you can basically make in-case arguments for so many things and for a rocket that is trying to be the first fully reusable rocket. There's never been a fully reusable rocket. People don't understand. This is like the holy grail of rocketry. So you've got to delete the part or process step. Super important. You can't hedge your bets. That's why the grid funds, for example, do not fall down because that's a whole extra mechanism that we don't need. Also, whatever requirement or constraint you have, it must come with a name, not a department. Because you can't ask the department. You have to ask a person. That person who's putting forward their requirement or constraint must agree that they must take responsibility for that requirement. Otherwise, you can have a requirement that basically an intern two years ago randomly came up with off the cuff and they're not even at the company anymore. These things are often just way more silly than you think. So step one, make your requirements less dumb. Step two, delete the part or process step. If you're not adding things back in 10% of the time, you're clearly not deleting enough. And then only the third step is simplify or optimize. The third step, not the first step. The reason it's the third step is because possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist. Everyone's been trained in high school and college that you've got to answer the question. Convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb. You'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically, without knowing it, they've got a mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist. And then finally, you get to step four, which is accelerate cycle time. You're moving too slowly, go faster. But don't go faster until you have worked on the other three things first. You can always make things go faster. And then the final step is automate. Now, I've personally made the mistake of going backwards on all five steps multiple times. Literally, I automated, accelerated, simplified, and then deleted. One example I've talked about before is there were these fiberglass mats on top of the Model 3 battery pack that were in between the floor pan and the battery. And it was at one point choking the battery pack production line. And I was basically living on the battery pack production line trying to fix the line. It was choking the entire Model 3 production program. So the first mistake was I tried to fix the automation, like make the robot better. So automating was a mistake. Then accelerating was a mistake. Then optimizing was a mistake. And finally, I said, what the hell are these mats for? And I asked the battery safety team, what are these mats for? Are they for fire protection or something? They said, no, they're for noise and vibration. Then I asked an NVH, a noise, vibration, harshness team, what's it for? They said fire safety. So literally, it was like being in a Dilbert cartoon. Actually, I feel like I'm in a Dilbert cartoon quite frequently. So then finally, OK, great, let's try a car with the fiberglass mats and without. And they put a microphone to both and see if you can tell the difference. In fact, I was like, which one is which? So we just deleted them and just bypassed this $2 million robot cell. It was just a complete pile of nonsense."

Founder Mode

73,366 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Eric Glyman says Ramp follow’s Elon Musk’s algorithm for building products: 1. Make your requirements less dumb. 2. Try very hard to delete the part or process. 3. Simplify and optimize. 4. Accelerate. 5. Automate. “What we are trying to do is take that methodology and style of thinking and ask about every dollar or hour that organizations choose to spend, and how can we build technologies that make it so you can just run your business more profitably with less effort.” “Elon's algorithm is one that has been incredibly motivating and orienting and clarifying for us.”

.Eric Glyman says Ramp follow’s Elon Musk’s algorithm for building products: 1. Make your requirements less dumb. 2. Try very hard to delete the part or process. 3. Simplify and optimize. 4. Accelerate. 5. Automate. “What we are trying to do is take that methodology and style of thinking and ask about every dollar or hour that organizations choose to spend, and how can we build technologies that make it so you can just run your business more profitably with less effort.” “Elon's algorithm is one that has been incredibly motivating and orienting and clarifying for us.”

David Senra

146,854 次观看 • 6 天前

This video is the perfect example of one of Elon Musk's most famous quotes: “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist” Elon Musk In the first part of the video we can see robot arms seam sealing the chassis of a car, which is a common process for cars made with hundreds of stamped sheets welded together by thousands of welds. This is for protecting the car against corrosion and leaks This was marketed as “seamless perfection” and as an “innovation” But what is really happening is that engineers spent countless hours optimizing a process that SHOULDN'T EXIST! Why?! Because a car underbody made with only 2 pieces using Gigacastings eliminates thousands of hyper optimized micro and macro processes and save companies space, time, labor and ultimately thousands of $$$ per car Just like the Model Y, the Cybertruck and Tesla's future vehicles It is no coincidence that OEMs and suppliers around the world have purchased over 180 Giga Presses to imitate Tesla Elon's quote is from Everyday Astronaut Starbase tour video

This video is the perfect example of one of Elon Musk's most famous quotes: “The most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist” Elon Musk In the first part of the video we can see robot arms seam sealing the chassis of a car, which is a common process for cars made with hundreds of stamped sheets welded together by thousands of welds. This is for protecting the car against corrosion and leaks This was marketed as “seamless perfection” and as an “innovation” But what is really happening is that engineers spent countless hours optimizing a process that SHOULDN'T EXIST! Why?! Because a car underbody made with only 2 pieces using Gigacastings eliminates thousands of hyper optimized micro and macro processes and save companies space, time, labor and ultimately thousands of $$$ per car Just like the Model Y, the Cybertruck and Tesla's future vehicles It is no coincidence that OEMs and suppliers around the world have purchased over 180 Giga Presses to imitate Tesla Elon's quote is from Everyday Astronaut Starbase tour video

Luca Greco

845,238 次观看 • 2 年前

Elon Musk: I always assume I'm wrong to some degree. “I really take the position that I'm always, to some degree, wrong. The aspiration is to be less wrong. We're always, to some degree, wrong. It doesn't matter who you are. I believe in the philosophy of trying to minimize the wrongheadedness over time.” Interview with Rory Cellan-Jones, BBC, January 2016

Elon Musk: I always assume I'm wrong to some degree. “I really take the position that I'm always, to some degree, wrong. The aspiration is to be less wrong. We're always, to some degree, wrong. It doesn't matter who you are. I believe in the philosophy of trying to minimize the wrongheadedness over time.” Interview with Rory Cellan-Jones, BBC, January 2016

ELON CLIPS

172,830 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨ELON MUSK: Every government should have a Department of Government Efficiency. "I think governments should have some process for garbage collection. So if you only have a process for creating regulations, but no process for deleting regulations, eventually everything is illegal and nothing is allowed to happen. So it's very important that all governments have a team that is responsible for reducing the size of government and for getting rid of regulations."

🚨ELON MUSK: Every government should have a Department of Government Efficiency. "I think governments should have some process for garbage collection. So if you only have a process for creating regulations, but no process for deleting regulations, eventually everything is illegal and nothing is allowed to happen. So it's very important that all governments have a team that is responsible for reducing the size of government and for getting rid of regulations."

DogeDesigner

330,943 次观看 • 1 年前

ELON: THE WINDOW TO MAKE LIFE MULTIPLANETARY IS OPEN - FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER Elon Musk: “The window of opportunity to make life multiplanetary and have a base on the moon or Mars is open for the first time in the four and a half billion-year history of Earth. While the window is open, we should make life multiplanetary.” Source: Full Send Podcast, August 2022

ELON: THE WINDOW TO MAKE LIFE MULTIPLANETARY IS OPEN - FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER Elon Musk: “The window of opportunity to make life multiplanetary and have a base on the moon or Mars is open for the first time in the four and a half billion-year history of Earth. While the window is open, we should make life multiplanetary.” Source: Full Send Podcast, August 2022

Mario Nawfal

1,905,754 次观看 • 11 个月前

.Scott Alexander uses SpaceX to illustrate the lower bound of what superintelligence could achieve: "We have something which is smarter than Elon Musk, better at optimizing things than Elon Musk. We have 10,000 parts in a rocket supply chain. How many of those parts can Elon personally yell at people to optimize? We could have a different copy of the superintelligence, optimizing every single part full time.”

.Scott Alexander uses SpaceX to illustrate the lower bound of what superintelligence could achieve: "We have something which is smarter than Elon Musk, better at optimizing things than Elon Musk. We have 10,000 parts in a rocket supply chain. How many of those parts can Elon personally yell at people to optimize? We could have a different copy of the superintelligence, optimizing every single part full time.”

Dwarkesh Patel

145,504 次观看 • 1 年前

Kevin O'Leary on Elon Musk: “Very few people at this point would doubt Elon Musk on anything. He kind of has mandates and he delivers one way or the other. Chinese are kicking our butts. They put on 500 gigawatts of power last year in China. They don't have the vision of space, but that means they're going to beat us in AI data centers on the ground. So there's a lot of concern about that. This data center thing is a big problem to stay competitive. I love Elon Musk's vision on this. The thing about Elon Musk is he's the modern Bruce Wayne, there's no question about it.”

Kevin O'Leary on Elon Musk: “Very few people at this point would doubt Elon Musk on anything. He kind of has mandates and he delivers one way or the other. Chinese are kicking our butts. They put on 500 gigawatts of power last year in China. They don't have the vision of space, but that means they're going to beat us in AI data centers on the ground. So there's a lot of concern about that. This data center thing is a big problem to stay competitive. I love Elon Musk's vision on this. The thing about Elon Musk is he's the modern Bruce Wayne, there's no question about it.”

DogeDesigner

202,371 次观看 • 5 个月前

Trump advisor tells Jonathan Karl the message to Senate Republicans who try to oppose confirming Matt Gaetz: "If you are on the wrong side of the vote, you’re buying yourself a primary. That is all. And there’s a guy named Elon Musk who is going to finance it" ABC News

Trump advisor tells Jonathan Karl the message to Senate Republicans who try to oppose confirming Matt Gaetz: "If you are on the wrong side of the vote, you’re buying yourself a primary. That is all. And there’s a guy named Elon Musk who is going to finance it" ABC News

Selina Wang

1,294,104 次观看 • 1 年前

Some have lost a lot of money betting against Elon and $TSLA. I’m not long a car company, I’m long Elon Musk. The car business is slowing, but the stock is still a bet on the future with robotaxis, AI, and Elon Musk's vision. At ~200x forward earnings, Elon has to make the case to investors. Varney & Co.

Some have lost a lot of money betting against Elon and $TSLA. I’m not long a car company, I’m long Elon Musk. The car business is slowing, but the stock is still a bet on the future with robotaxis, AI, and Elon Musk's vision. At ~200x forward earnings, Elon has to make the case to investors. Varney & Co.

David Nicholas

15,920 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk Elon Musk : Engineering is the closest thing to being a wizard in the real world “I guess I think of myself as a technologist or engineer. And I seem to have some skill in developing new technologies of various kinds. And when I was a kid, my favorite book was The Lord of the Rings. And I loved Gandalf. And it's like, well, what's the closest thing to being a wizard in the real world? And I think that engineering is kind of like that. It's like you make new technologies that didn't exist before. So, engineering technology that is magic. As Arthur C. Clarke would say, 'Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'”

Elon Musk Elon Musk : Engineering is the closest thing to being a wizard in the real world “I guess I think of myself as a technologist or engineer. And I seem to have some skill in developing new technologies of various kinds. And when I was a kid, my favorite book was The Lord of the Rings. And I loved Gandalf. And it's like, well, what's the closest thing to being a wizard in the real world? And I think that engineering is kind of like that. It's like you make new technologies that didn't exist before. So, engineering technology that is magic. As Arthur C. Clarke would say, 'Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'”

Beanie👾

35,777 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 ELON: STARTING A COMPANY IS BRUTAL “A lot of times, people think creating a company is going to be fun. I would say it’s not. There’s no point in spending your time on things that are going right because you’re only spending your time on things that are going wrong. A friend says ‘Starting a company is like staring into the abyss and eating glass.’ Most startups fail—90%, arguably 99%, of startups fail. That’s the ‘staring into the abyss’ part. The ‘eating glass’ part is that you will work on the problems the company needs you to solve, not the problems you want to work on.” Source: Historic Vids

🚨 ELON: STARTING A COMPANY IS BRUTAL “A lot of times, people think creating a company is going to be fun. I would say it’s not. There’s no point in spending your time on things that are going right because you’re only spending your time on things that are going wrong. A friend says ‘Starting a company is like staring into the abyss and eating glass.’ Most startups fail—90%, arguably 99%, of startups fail. That’s the ‘staring into the abyss’ part. The ‘eating glass’ part is that you will work on the problems the company needs you to solve, not the problems you want to work on.” Source: Historic Vids

Mario Nawfal

491,299 次观看 • 2 年前

🇺🇸 ELON: "THE CONCEPT OF GOOD WOULDN'T EXIST WITHOUT HUMANITY" Katie Miller: "Do you think humanity is inherently good or is it just trying to be?" Elon: "The concept of good wouldn't exist without humanity. I do think humanity is on balance good. I generally think increasing the amount of consciousness in the universe is a good thing. Try to understand the nature of the universe, which you can only do by increasing conscious awareness." Source: Katie Miller Elon Musk

🇺🇸 ELON: "THE CONCEPT OF GOOD WOULDN'T EXIST WITHOUT HUMANITY" Katie Miller: "Do you think humanity is inherently good or is it just trying to be?" Elon: "The concept of good wouldn't exist without humanity. I do think humanity is on balance good. I generally think increasing the amount of consciousness in the universe is a good thing. Try to understand the nature of the universe, which you can only do by increasing conscious awareness." Source: Katie Miller Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

93,701 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk on the biggest danger of AI and robotics: “I think probably the biggest danger of AI or maybe the biggest danger of AI and robotics going wrong is government People who are opposed to corporations or worried about corporations should really worry the most about government. Government is just a corporation in the limit; it is the biggest corporation with a monopoly on violence The government could potentially use AI and robotics to suppress the population. That’s a serious concern” Elon says the real threat is Big Government armed with superintelligence

Elon Musk on the biggest danger of AI and robotics: “I think probably the biggest danger of AI or maybe the biggest danger of AI and robotics going wrong is government People who are opposed to corporations or worried about corporations should really worry the most about government. Government is just a corporation in the limit; it is the biggest corporation with a monopoly on violence The government could potentially use AI and robotics to suppress the population. That’s a serious concern” Elon says the real threat is Big Government armed with superintelligence

X Freeze

719,542 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk on time management: "I try to divide companies into one day, so today is a Tesla day for example. This is going to sound pretty strange, but I only have one part time assistant; I do most of the scheduling myself because it's impossible for someone else to know what the priorities are."

Elon Musk on time management: "I try to divide companies into one day, so today is a Tesla day for example. This is going to sound pretty strange, but I only have one part time assistant; I do most of the scheduling myself because it's impossible for someone else to know what the priorities are."

Sawyer Merritt

2,379,952 次观看 • 3 年前