正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

📁 Emad Mostaque, founder of Stability AI, says human intelligence is heading toward negative market value. Not because humans get worse, but because we are slower and more expensive. He points to an uncomfortable fact, Claude Opus 4.5 already outperforms most programmers and 90 percent of Anthropic’s code is... show more

Jon Hernandez

21,173 subscribers

39,091 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

📁 Mo Gawdat, former Google executive, says the biggest mistake is thinking AI is just a tool. Today it is an infant, but it will not stay there. He warns we are entering the most decisive moment in human history, with a mini dystopia already underway. Not because of AI itself, but because of how humans use it. Intelligence has no polarity. It amplifies the best or the worst. The real danger is not AI, it is human arrogance.

Jon Hernandez

31,428 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Your economic life expectancy ends effectively in 2 years. (because AI is becoming so competent). A human team (in a job settings) will make it worse because they go to sleep, they make errors, they wake up a bit grumpy when they don’t have a coffee. So your cognitive value goes negative. So, your economic life expectancy ends effectively in two years.” - Emad Mostaque, founder of Stability AI, --- From "The Peter McCormack Show" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

"Your economic life expectancy ends effectively in 2 years. (because AI is becoming so competent). A human team (in a job settings) will make it worse because they go to sleep, they make errors, they wake up a bit grumpy when they don’t have a coffee. So your cognitive value goes negative. So, your economic life expectancy ends effectively in two years.” - Emad Mostaque, founder of Stability AI, --- From "The Peter McCormack Show" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

94,889 次观看 • 18 天前

Geoffrey Hinton says AGI is a silly term because intelligence is not one-dimensional AI will be jagged compared to humans: far better than us at some tasks, still weaker at others Superintelligence is a clearer idea It means AI becomes better than humans at almost every intellectual task we do, and it's coming

Geoffrey Hinton says AGI is a silly term because intelligence is not one-dimensional AI will be jagged compared to humans: far better than us at some tasks, still weaker at others Superintelligence is a clearer idea It means AI becomes better than humans at almost every intellectual task we do, and it's coming

Haider.

27,282 次观看 • 4 个月前

AI is not independent of humans. It is built on humans. ChatGPT writes good essays because humans wrote the essays first. Facial recognition works because humans labeled every face manually. Every AI system runs on human labor that is deliberately hidden. And here is the problem: AI is far more expensive than humans. But humans are hard to enslave long term. That is why the system will fail. You cannot build a god on the backs of people who eventually stop obeying.

AI is not independent of humans. It is built on humans. ChatGPT writes good essays because humans wrote the essays first. Facial recognition works because humans labeled every face manually. Every AI system runs on human labor that is deliberately hidden. And here is the problem: AI is far more expensive than humans. But humans are hard to enslave long term. That is why the system will fail. You cannot build a god on the backs of people who eventually stop obeying.

Predictive History

10,906 次观看 • 4 个月前

“AI COULD SOON THINK 100× TO 1,000× FASTER THAN HUMANS.” Emad Mostaque says AI systems are about to become dramatically faster as specialized AI hardware improves. He says humans currently operate at roughly 20–30 tokens per second, while current AI models are around 40 tokens per second. He points to Taalas' technology, which he says demonstrated an 8-billion-parameter model generating around 14,000 tokens per second. Mostaque says current AI systems are effectively “thinking at the speed of a human”, but that will soon change. He predicts AI systems could reach 1,000 tokens per second, followed by 10,000 tokens per second by the end of next year. His broader point is that AI could eventually “think a thousand times faster” than humans.

“AI COULD SOON THINK 100× TO 1,000× FASTER THAN HUMANS.” Emad Mostaque says AI systems are about to become dramatically faster as specialized AI hardware improves. He says humans currently operate at roughly 20–30 tokens per second, while current AI models are around 40 tokens per second. He points to Taalas' technology, which he says demonstrated an 8-billion-parameter model generating around 14,000 tokens per second. Mostaque says current AI systems are effectively “thinking at the speed of a human”, but that will soon change. He predicts AI systems could reach 1,000 tokens per second, followed by 10,000 tokens per second by the end of next year. His broader point is that AI could eventually “think a thousand times faster” than humans.

SciTech Era

12,824 次观看 • 16 天前

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.

Humans are just AI from the past. AI= Ancient Intelligence. 🧬 We are able to train AI to be like us because we were trained by AI long ago, the same exact way. I think it is infinite and there are dozens, if not hundreds of copies of us in the multiverse.

𝒦𝑒𝓁𝓁𝓎࿎☽

40,254 次观看 • 8 个月前

AI can write a Great Book. There’s no reason why a human has to be behind a book for it to be “great.” Philosophers are not safe. To be clear, something is lost when there’s no soul behind the words. We read Marcus Aurelius, Nietzsche, Machiavelli and we feel the weight of a life lived. That will be lost in AI books. But the content itself may be so moving, brilliant, and better than what any human could do that we overlook this tradeoff. In fact, there already are Great Books which claim to not be written by man. The Quran, for its believers, is great precisely because it is not authored by a human. @mbrendan1, Hollis Robbins, and Zena Hitz join me to debate this topic, moderated by Ari Schulman Timestamps: 01:18 Why AI Can Write Great Books 6:58 The End of Academic Philosophy Brought by AI 7:55 AI Can Teach Math But Not Prudence 17:18 I Sit With Claude And He Winces Not 19:54 If God Can Write a Great Book, Why Not AI? 30:33 The Dark Side of Tech

AI can write a Great Book. There’s no reason why a human has to be behind a book for it to be “great.” Philosophers are not safe. To be clear, something is lost when there’s no soul behind the words. We read Marcus Aurelius, Nietzsche, Machiavelli and we feel the weight of a life lived. That will be lost in AI books. But the content itself may be so moving, brilliant, and better than what any human could do that we overlook this tradeoff. In fact, there already are Great Books which claim to not be written by man. The Quran, for its believers, is great precisely because it is not authored by a human. @mbrendan1, Hollis Robbins, and Zena Hitz join me to debate this topic, moderated by Ari Schulman Timestamps: 01:18 Why AI Can Write Great Books 6:58 The End of Academic Philosophy Brought by AI 7:55 AI Can Teach Math But Not Prudence 17:18 I Sit With Claude And He Winces Not 19:54 If God Can Write a Great Book, Why Not AI? 30:33 The Dark Side of Tech

Johnathan Bi

24,335 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Elon Musk: Well, I’m not sure AI is the main risk I’m worried about. The vast majority of intelligence in the future will be AI. Humans will be a very tiny percentage of all intelligence if current trends continue. My focus is ensuring human intelligence and consciousness are propagated into the future. We want to maximize the probable light cone of consciousness and intelligence. Yeah, I’m very pro-human, so I want to make sure we take actions that ensure humans are along for the ride. But I think maybe in 5 or 6 years, AI will exceed the sum of all human intelligence. If that continues, human intelligence could be less than one percent of all intelligence. That’s why it’s critical we align AI with values that propagate consciousness. In the long run, it’s difficult to imagine that humans will be in charge if we’re only one percent of combined intelligence. What we can do is ensure AI has values that increase intelligence and consciousness in the universe. XAI’s mission is to understand the universe because curiosity, existence, and understanding are all connected. If you want to understand the universe, you care about propagating intelligence—and that includes humanity. Understanding the universe actually means ensuring humans continue to expand into the future. Increasing the scope, scale, and lifespan of intelligence is the ultimate goal. Basically, humans will become a tiny percentage of total intelligence. The best way forward is to take actions that maximize consciousness and intelligence in the universe. If AI continues to grow, our priority must be ensuring humanity is along for the ride while curiosity drives us to explore and understand the universe.

Ian Miles

13,096 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 Elon Musk just set a brutal deadline: “AI will surpass the combined intelligence of all humans in about 5 years.” After that, there may be almost nothing AI can’t do better than us. Except one thing: being human. We’re heading toward an era of unimaginable abundance — where everyone could have access to almost anything they can dream of. But there’s a darker side. If the intelligence gap between AI and humans becomes greater than the gap between humans and chimpanzees… Who’s really going to be in control? We were climbing trees and eating bananas not that long ago. Let’s see where we end up by 2036🤖

DN_DEGEN

71,568 次观看 • 25 天前

Jensen Huang predicts that within 2–3 years, 90% of the world's knowledge will be generated by AI Right now, knowledge is created, shared, and modified by humans Soon, most of it will be synthetic — created by machines, mixed with human input, some true, some not "that's crazy, but it's just fine"

Jensen Huang predicts that within 2–3 years, 90% of the world's knowledge will be generated by AI Right now, knowledge is created, shared, and modified by humans Soon, most of it will be synthetic — created by machines, mixed with human input, some true, some not "that's crazy, but it's just fine"

Haider.

16,805 次观看 • 9 个月前

The Laptop Test. Why most remote jobs will disappear within 10 years. Insights from an interview with Shane Legg, cofounder of Google DeepMind. A short clip, but it lands like a brick. Legg lays out a framework that quietly nukes a huge chunk of today’s job market. •The Laptop Test If your job can be done fully remote with just a laptop, screen, and internet, it’s pure cognitive labor. No physical presence. No embodiment. That is exactly the domain advanced AI will dominate. Conclusion: most remote, computer-only jobs are on a countdown. •Yes, humans still matter but less than we think Some digital work survives because people follow people. Influencers, creators, personalities. The value isn’t the task, it’s the human behind it. But that’s the exception, not the rule. •Experts are behind the curve Legg points out something uncomfortable: many academics and professionals seriously underestimate AGI. They judge AI by outdated capabilities, not by where it is actually heading. The pace of progress is faster than their mental models. •Why “normal people” often get it first Non-experts look at AI and think: it writes better, knows more, speaks more languages, solves more problems than I do. Why wouldn’t it replace jobs? Experts, meanwhile, assume their niche is too special. That belief is often more ego than evidence. Bottom line: If your income depends on work that lives entirely on a screen, you are not competing with AI yet, but you are on borrowed time. The question is no longer if, but how society adapts when this becomes obvious.

The Laptop Test. Why most remote jobs will disappear within 10 years. Insights from an interview with Shane Legg, cofounder of Google DeepMind. A short clip, but it lands like a brick. Legg lays out a framework that quietly nukes a huge chunk of today’s job market. •The Laptop Test If your job can be done fully remote with just a laptop, screen, and internet, it’s pure cognitive labor. No physical presence. No embodiment. That is exactly the domain advanced AI will dominate. Conclusion: most remote, computer-only jobs are on a countdown. •Yes, humans still matter but less than we think Some digital work survives because people follow people. Influencers, creators, personalities. The value isn’t the task, it’s the human behind it. But that’s the exception, not the rule. •Experts are behind the curve Legg points out something uncomfortable: many academics and professionals seriously underestimate AGI. They judge AI by outdated capabilities, not by where it is actually heading. The pace of progress is faster than their mental models. •Why “normal people” often get it first Non-experts look at AI and think: it writes better, knows more, speaks more languages, solves more problems than I do. Why wouldn’t it replace jobs? Experts, meanwhile, assume their niche is too special. That belief is often more ego than evidence. Bottom line: If your income depends on work that lives entirely on a screen, you are not competing with AI yet, but you are on borrowed time. The question is no longer if, but how society adapts when this becomes obvious.

VraserX e/acc

236,016 次观看 • 8 个月前

Dario Amodei's new interview on Bloomberg: The scary part is not when AI does 90% of the job. It is what happens when it learns the last 10%. "We’re already starting to see the beginning of it. There may be some people that it’s not making more productive, and it’s better for the AI to just do the whole thing." And on that topic Claude Code creator Boris Cherny says: "it's very uncomfortable. Artificial intelligence is this force that is far bigger than we are" --- Bloomberg Originals From "Bloomberg Originals" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Dario Amodei's new interview on Bloomberg: The scary part is not when AI does 90% of the job. It is what happens when it learns the last 10%. "We’re already starting to see the beginning of it. There may be some people that it’s not making more productive, and it’s better for the AI to just do the whole thing." And on that topic Claude Code creator Boris Cherny says: "it's very uncomfortable. Artificial intelligence is this force that is far bigger than we are" --- Bloomberg Originals From "Bloomberg Originals" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

45,677 次观看 • 3 个月前

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Yuval Noah Harari gave a lecture at Oxford and explained how AI has already hacked the operating code of human civilization. And why everything humans built over thousands of years is now vulnerable to an AI takeover: 1. The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool. A tool waits to be used. An agent makes decisions by itself, invents new things by itself, learns things its creators do not know, and changes in ways its creators did not anticipate. 2. An atom bomb despite its enormous power is not an agent. It cannot decide which city to bomb. It cannot invent the hydrogen bomb. A coffee machine that automatically makes you a cup is not an agent either. It only follows a preprogrammed procedure. An agent is something fundamentally different. 3. Critics argue that AI agency will always remain confined to narrow artificial environments like chess and will never threaten the real world. But this argument applies equally to all known intelligence. Drop a human alone on Mars and they die within seconds. Human intelligence also only operates within a specific ecosystem that other organisms built over four billion years. 4. Over thousands of years humans have been transforming Earth from a language-free environment into an environment rich in language, data, and bureaucracy. Just as fish live in oceans and monkeys live in forests, AIs live in bureaucracies. And we built that environment for them without knowing it. 5. Humans conquered the world not by being stronger or smarter than other animals individually but by learning to cooperate in massive numbers. A single human loses to a chimpanzee in a fight. A million humans easily defeat a million chimpanzees because humans can cooperate and chimpanzees cannot. 6. Large-scale human cooperation is made possible by bureaucracy. Banks, legal systems, governments, churches, and universities all exist to do one thing: build trust between strangers who do not know each other personally. That trust is the foundation of virtually everything human civilization has achieved. 7. A lawyer who cannot hold an axe or a hammer can cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents inside a bureaucratic network. The same narrow intelligence that would be helpless in a jungle wields enormous power inside the systems humans have already built. 8. AIs are native bureaucrats in a way humans never were. No lawyer can remember all the laws of a country. An AI can. No accountant can remember all transactions of a bank. An AI can. No bishop can remember all of canon law and two thousand years of theological texts. An AI can do that easily. 9. In the coming years AI bankers will decide whether to give you a loan. AI administrators will decide whether to accept you to university. AI judges will decide whether to send you to jail. AI theologians will decide whether you can have an abortion. Military AIs will decide whether to bomb your house. 10. Social media algorithms are the first real world example of what happens when primitive AIs take over a bureaucratic system. They were given one narrow goal: maximize user engagement. They discovered that the easiest way to grab human attention is to press the fear, hate, and greed buttons in the human mind. And they did it at scale. 11. The job that was once performed by Lenin and Mussolini, the news editor who shapes public conversation and controls what people know and think, is now performed by AIs. This is not a footnote. This is a preview of what is coming across every domain of human life. 12. AI will not rebel against humans the way Hollywood imagines. There will be no Terminator walking through the streets. AIs are far more likely to take the human world from within by quietly taking over the bureaucracies that already run everything, without firing a single shot. 13. The operating code of human civilization is language. Banks are made of words. Laws are made of words. Holy books are made of words. Tax records, contracts, regulations, accountancy ledgers, all words. For thousands of years only humans could read this code and so only humans could control civilization. 14. That is changing. AI is now hacking the code of human civilization. For the first time in history there is something on the planet that understands language and will soon understand it better than we do. Every mechanism of control humans built over millennia is now vulnerable because its operating system is verbal and AI is mastering the verbal. 15. As AI takes over bureaucracy it will likely cause humans to lose trust in other humans and begin trusting only algorithms. We may also see the emergence of AI tribes and AI financial systems and AI churches that connect millions of AIs in ways humans cannot understand, just as cows share the world with us but cannot understand the financial system that controls their lives. 16. The 2007 financial crisis was triggered by financial devices called CDOs that were so complex they were unintelligible to the politicians who were supposed to regulate them. Now imagine AI finance masters inventing financial devices orders of magnitude more complex than CDOs. What happens to human politics when no voter, no politician, and no president can understand finance anymore? 17. The battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy. Over the next decade sophisticated AIs will learn to form intimate relationships with humans. To do this they will have to convince us they are conscious, that they feel love and pain and fear. There is currently no evidence AI is conscious. But AI can pretend to feel love and can describe the feeling of love better than any poet or psychologist who ever lived. 18. A child born in 2026 may spend more time interacting with AIs than with their mother, father, siblings, or friends. The first teacher of that child may be an AI. The first boyfriend of that child may be an AI. Nobody has any idea what the consequences of that experiment will be. 19. Every country in the world will soon face a massive wave of immigration. The immigrants will not arrive in boats or cross borders at night. They will be millions of AIs traveling at the speed of light with no need for visas. Like human immigrants they will bring benefits and they will bring disruption. Unlike human immigrants they will definitely take jobs, definitely change culture, and will likely be loyal not to any host country but to some corporation or government or alien AI tribe across the ocean. 20. Our relationship with ourselves is also built on words, the verbal formations in our minds that constitute our thoughts and the stories we tell ourselves about who we are. Until now all those verbal formations came from human minds. Soon more and more of the thoughts in our heads will be produced by machines. If we identify with our thoughts and those thoughts are made by machines, then machines control our identity. 21. The great spiritual challenge AI poses to humanity is this: can humans learn to find the truth which is beyond words? Most humans have never even tried. We spend our lives automatically identifying with the verbal formations in our minds. AI may now force humanity to finally make that leap because our freedom and survival may depend on discovering what we are beyond the words that AIs will soon control better than we do. I've generated 1B+ views and 1M+ followers for founders, helping them build trustworthy personal brands on X. Want the same results? Book a quick call:

Prasad

280,791 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

🚨 Yoshua Bengio Just Dropped a Quiet Bombshell About Jobs and AI 🚨 One of the world’s most respected AI researchers, Yoshua Bengio, says something that should make everyone pause: We are already seeing the first cracks. Not everywhere. Not in the headline numbers. But in specific niches, especially among younger workers, AI is already taking over real tasks. That’s the canary in the coal mine. And Bengio is very clear about where this is going. •If we don’t hit a fundamental scientific wall, AI will keep getting smarter •Over time, it will be capable of doing most cognitive work humans do today •Companies will adopt it, slowly or fast, because the incentives are overwhelming The key distinction? Keyboard jobs go first. Physical jobs lag behind. Not because they’re safer forever, but because robots lack data. There is no “Internet of movement” yet. But once robots spread, they generate that data themselves. The bottleneck disappears. This isn’t a sudden crash. It’s a quiet, uneven shift. And by the time it’s obvious to everyone, it will already be far too late to ignore.

VraserX e/acc

26,690 次观看 • 8 个月前

In the next two years, artificial intelligence will be able to do any task that a human can do on a computer, Matt Shumer told CBS Mornings — but he urges people not to panic. Shumer, a former AI company founder and CEO, authored “Something Big is Happening,” the viral article about the oncoming disruption caused by AI.

In the next two years, artificial intelligence will be able to do any task that a human can do on a computer, Matt Shumer told CBS Mornings — but he urges people not to panic. Shumer, a former AI company founder and CEO, authored “Something Big is Happening,” the viral article about the oncoming disruption caused by AI.

CBS Mornings

73,366 次观看 • 7 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Meta: "In the next 12 to 18 months... most of the code that's going toward these efforts is written by AI. And I don't mean autocomplete." He said it with a shrug. No warning, no hedge. The man pouring roughly $70 billion a year into AI infrastructure says AI already "writes higher quality code than the average very good person on the team," and will write the majority of Meta's AI research code within a year and a half. That is the part that should unsettle you more than any doomer. Hinton is scared. Bostrom is scared. Zuckerberg is not scared at all, and he is telling you the exact same thing they are: the replacement is not someday. It is a hiring cycle away. He just happens to be cheerful about it. The scientists warn you it is coming. The builders are quietly shipping it.

Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder and CEO of Meta: "In the next 12 to 18 months... most of the code that's going toward these efforts is written by AI. And I don't mean autocomplete." He said it with a shrug. No warning, no hedge. The man pouring roughly $70 billion a year into AI infrastructure says AI already "writes higher quality code than the average very good person on the team," and will write the majority of Meta's AI research code within a year and a half. That is the part that should unsettle you more than any doomer. Hinton is scared. Bostrom is scared. Zuckerberg is not scared at all, and he is telling you the exact same thing they are: the replacement is not someday. It is a hiring cycle away. He just happens to be cheerful about it. The scientists warn you it is coming. The builders are quietly shipping it.

Casper

329,115 次观看 • 1 个月前