Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

[ENG] 230406 VITA500 Zero CF Interview (01:40) OK: DM: GD: TB: source: #LE_SSERAFIM #르세라핌 #LE_SSERAFIM_UNFORGIVEN

14,833 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Here's an edit of the Elon Musk interview hosted by Katherine Brodsky discussing a myriad of topics. This version boosts audio quality and reduces pauses and dead space by 33%. Thank you David Carbutt for the work! Timestamps: (00:00) The Journey of SpaceX and Tesla (01:06) Misunderstandings and Misinformation (03:42) The Role of Social Media in Free Speech (04:12) The Impact of Government Control on Media (06:32) The Evolution of Twitter and the Need for a Fresh Start (07:17) The Challenges of Moderation on Social Media Platforms (12:12) The Role of Citizen Journalism in Modern Media (17:45) The Future of Legacy Media (28:08) The Power of Amplifying Ideas and People (36:35) The Importance of Open-Mindedness and Self-Criticism (38:49) Community Notes and Open Source Data (39:58) The Role of Accuracy and Opinions in Posting (40:22) The Idea of a Sarcasm Detector (41:01) The Potential of AI in Enhancing Accuracy (42:39) The Future of AI and Deepfakes (44:59) The Vision for X as an All-in-One App (46:38) The Concept of Trust in Institutions (51:24) The Impact of Gene Editing on Humanity (55:42) The Challenge of Censorship and Free Speech (01:02:24) The Unusual Case of a Voice Doppelganger (01:07:35) Starting a Conversation: Texting and Simulations (01:08:43) Discussing Starship Launch and Future Plans (01:10:32) Engaging in Casual Conversations and Sharing Photos (01:11:55) Exploring the Idea of Expanding the Scope of Reality (01:13:27) Exploring the Concept of Simulation Theory (01:13:52) Discussing the Concept of AI in the Simulation (01:20:42) Addressing Questions about Ad Demonetization (01:23:11) Addressing Concerns about Doxxing and Harassment (01:30:47) Discussing the Monetization of Spaces (01:31:34) Discussing the Future of AI and OpenAI (01:35:17) Discussion on National Debt and AI (01:36:06) Involvement of Family Members (01:36:45) Questions and Answers (01:37:31) Impersonations and Voice Modulations (01:38:47) Discussion on Accents and Language Learning (01:41:14) Discussion on AI and Voice Imitation (01:46:45) Serious Discussion on AI and Social Media (01:51:27) Discussion on Physics and AI (01:58:18) Closing Remarks and Final Questions

Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷

2,033,302 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

19,872 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🧠 INTERVIEW: WIKIPEDIA’S CO-FOUNDER SAYS THE INTERNET’S “TRUTH MACHINE” HAS BEEN CAPTURED Millions trust Wikipedia like gospel. But according to cofounder Larry Sanger, the platform has been quietly hijacked by anonymous editors, PR operatives, and intelligence-linked actors who use it to attack reputations, shape political narratives, and control what the public sees as “fact.” He says the world’s largest source of truth is no longer neutral. It has become a weapon against dissent, inconvenient truths, and anyone who challenges the establishment line. We break it down: •⁠ ⁠Why 85% of Wikipedia’s top editors hide behind anonymity •⁠ ⁠How intelligence agencies and billionaires exploit that weakness •⁠ ⁠Why dissenting voices are purged while political labels get slapped on enemies •⁠ ⁠How biased articles are shaping the training data for AI models •⁠ ⁠And why Elon Musk’s Grokipedia may become a truth-seeking alternative Sanger warns that when a billion people rely on a captured platform, the entire information ecosystem becomes vulnerable. 01:23 – Larry Sanger’s “Nine Theses” roller coaster 01:42 – Host says Wikipedia’s system was weaponized against him 03:16 – Anonymous editors running intelligence operations 03:33 – 85% of Wikipedia’s “cops” are anonymous 05:39 – Intelligence agencies and wealthy actors can bribe editors 07:26 – PR firms run a multimillion-dollar Wikipedia influence business 07:44 – “Protection money for a reputation” 09:29 – CIA and FBI caught editing pages through WikiScanner 11:11 – China and Russia influencing Wikipedia at scale 12:32 – LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok still trust Wikipedia 13:52 – The solution begins with “organizing the troops” 15:02 – Government interference is not the answer 16:44 – Control a few key accounts, control the narrative 17:25 – Wikipedia has taken a clear side in the Gaza War 18:15 – “Gaza Genocide” article title not remotely neutral 21:51 – Religious bias exposed in the “Yahweh” article 23:34 – 61 billion visits, a few hundred editors control global truth 25:14 – Wikipedia now dangerously centralized 31:47 – Platform captured by the establishment left 32:20 – Blacklisted sources: Fox News, Sputnik, and more 34:24 – Thesis 1: Stop using the word “consensus” 34:49 – Thesis 2: Allow competing articles and frameworks 41:00 – Readers must become the arbiters of their own truth 42:55 – Thesis 4: Restore strict Neutrality 58:24 – Thesis 5: Reveal identities of executive editors 01:00:20 – Thesis 6: Create a trust score and rating system 01:09:59 – Thesis 7: Abolish source blacklists 01:14:40 – Thesis 8: End indefinite bans and permanent exile 01:17:57 – Thesis 9: Adopt a real constitutional process 01:22:41 – Call to action: Sign the petition and start editing

Mario Nawfal

1,639,725 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

.Dean W. Ball is one of the most famous opponents of AI regulation, and co-author of America's AI strategy. But unlike many new AI commentators he's a true intellectual and a blogger at heart — not a shallow ideologue or corporate mouthpiece. So he doesn't wave away concerns and predict a smooth simple ride. In fact, for Dean an unpredictable or volatile future is the reason to take as few big steps now as possible. He fears the wrong regulations, deployed too early, would "in a Shakespearean fashion, bring about the world that we do not want." More specifically, premature regulation might lock us into addressing the wrong problem (e.g. rogue AI when the real issue is power concentration), with the wrong target (e.g. models rather than companies), through the wrong institutions (e.g. AI-specific bodies that are captured by industry), while making it harder to build the actual solutions we'll need (e.g. open source or legal mechanisms newly enabled by AI). I booked an interview with Dean so I could thoroughly read his Substack, get to grips with his worldview, and figure out why I often see things differently. We cover: We'll get superintelligence, but it will probably be steerable (00:01:54) AI won't be militarised fast (00:11:10) AI self-improvement matters but is no game changer (00:28:58) The case for regulating at the last possible moment (00:33:51) AI could destroy our fragile democratic equilibria. So why not freak out? (00:53:41) Why Dean fears AI will soon be way overregulated (01:04:10) How to handle the real risks with minimal collateral damage (01:16:23) Easy wins against AI misuse (01:28:27) A company would be sued for trillions if their AI caused a pandemic (01:49:43) Dean dislikes compute thresholds and would do this instead. (01:59:06) Dean expects a MAGA-Yudkowskyite alliance. But Doomers and E/accs are more alike than different. (02:14:40) A tactical case for focusing on present-day harms (02:29:16) Is there any way to get the US government to actually use AI in its work? (02:47:43) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below — enjoy!

Rob Wiblin

28,859 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

BITCOIN RAILS #62: BITCOIN'S 3 BIGGEST CHALLENGES | with Neha Narula Director of Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Neha Narula is the Director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, where she focuses on Bitcoin research and the broader design tradeoffs of decentralized money systems. Her work often centers on what Bitcoin gets right—and where it runs into hard limits—especially around scaling, decentralization, and how systems behave as global demand increases. In this interview, Neha and I explore longer-term risks to Bitcoin—including advancements in quantum computing and the implications of a diminishing block subsidy—as well as the ongoing challenge of scaling Bitcoin without losing access to self-custody. A thoughtful conversation on how Bitcoin may change in the coming years, we also explore its social and governance dynamics—including tensions within the development community over protocol changes, scaling philosophies, and the future direction of the system. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox— an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:17 Neha’s Origins 02:26 Bitcoin to MIT 04:40 Media Lab Culture and Mission 11:34 CBDCs as Digital Cash Debate 24:42 Funding Model and Bitcoin Security Budget 29:55 Reorg Risk and Quantum Computing 32:14 Bitcoin Dev Funding Map 42:49 Governance and Corporate Stakes 50:23 Quantum Tradeoffs Framework 56:02 Post Quantum Proposals 58:59 Prioritize PQ Transactions 01:00:54 Satoshi Coins Debate 01:02:12 Mining Incentives And Price 01:08:08 Corporate Funding And Governance 01:10:54 Scaling Self Custody And L2s 01:20:30 Bitcoin Kernel And Wrap Up

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

24,580 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: RUSSIA IS BLEEDING OUT FROM THE INSIDE Power grids exploding. Soldiers unpaid. Cities running on generators. Putin says Russia’s economy is untouchable. Konstantin from Inside Russia says that’s a lie. He lived it, and what he describes sounds less like strength and more like survival on borrowed time. We cover: •⁠ ⁠Why Western sanctions are finally cutting off the oxygen •⁠ ⁠How oil giants like Rosneft and Lukoil are scrambling for cash •⁠ ⁠What life looks like when prices rise and supplies vanish overnight •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s best engineers and developers are leaving faster than they can be replaced •⁠ ⁠And how one wrong move could send the entire system crashing Konstantin says Russia’s economy isn’t dying quietly. It’s bleeding out in real time, and Putin can’t stop it. 02:02 – “Moscow is not Russia,” wealth versus decay beyond the capital 03:55 – From wild 90s freedom to Putin’s tightening grip 05:47 – The social contract: stay quiet and live comfortably 07:09 – The invasion ends that contract overnight 07:20 – The economic panic as companies flee 08:30 – Competing narratives: collapse or resilience 09:17 – How Russia stumbled into a war it did not plan for 10:50 – Shock and chaos among Russian officials 12:55 – Propaganda scrambles to invent justifications 14:30 – The instant exodus of Western companies 16:30 – Ikea, Apple, McDonald’s, and the first wave of panic 17:28 – Russia forbids dollar withdrawals to stop the run 18:40 – How Putin’s “war economy” kept the system alive 19:16 – Oil prices surge, saving Russia for two years 20:22 – Who blew up Nord Stream and who benefited most 21:04 – Why the U.S. gained as Europe lost Russian gas 22:19 – Decades of cheap energy end overnight 23:28 – How Russia gave Europe’s market to America 24:11 – The self-inflicted wound that wrecked Gazprom’s future 25:25 – The economic unraveling begins 26:25 – The perfect storm of sanctions, exodus, and brain drain 28:05 – Millions leave, the professionals among them 29:10 – War spending drains the “savings account” 30:12 – Putin’s reserves are drying up 31:48 – GDP myths and fake data inside Russia 32:25 – The illusion of growth built on war production 33:44 – Military factories slow and layoffs begin 35:03 – “The party’s over,” Russia hits zero growth 35:45 – Why Putin still refuses to end the war 37:29 – The Titanic analogy: lights on, hull already flooded 40:00 – Blackouts, shortages, and the slow collapse 42:00 – Siemens leaves, turbines fail, power plants decay 43:12 – Why China cannot replace Western tech 44:40 – The lagging effect of sanctions now hitting home 45:10 – Putin escalates war as protests begin to spread 46:50 – Early sparks of unrest across Russian cities 47:55 – Prices soar, infrastructure breaks down 49:01 – Fear inside Putin’s own circle grows 50:36 – Why he cannot stop the war without losing power 52:05 – The danger of returning soldiers and shrinking spoils 52:58 – Why the “territory win” is a poisoned prize 54:30 – Putin’s miscalculation as NATO grows stronger 56:20 – Mario challenges NATO’s role and the red line argument 57:55 – Konstantin’s rebuttal: “Diplomacy, not invasion” 59:03 – The myth of NATO encirclement 01:01:46 – How Putin turned NATO from partner to enemy for politics 01:03:02 – Why he really invaded Ukraine: falling ratings and stagnation 01:05:33 – The plan for a quick regime change gone wrong 01:06:52 – “He wanted control, not blood,” but the war trapped him 01:07:29 – Mario proposes future debates with data-driven experts

Mario Nawfal

2,263,753 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 PARTNERSHIP INTERVIEW: TON EX-PRESIDENT ON TELEGRAM’S PAVEL DUROV, THE FUTURE OF CRYPTO, AND WHY TON COULD HIT $1 TRILLION. He is the largest investor in Animoca, largest investor in TON, and one of crypto’s biggest whales A friend of Telegram’s Pavel Durov, Manuel Stotz stepped down as the President of TON Blockchain (launched by Telegram) to launch the world’s first TON Digital Asset Treasury. What Michael Saylor did with Bitcoin, and Tom Lee did with ETH, Manny is doing with TON. We discuss: – Why the 40-year debt supercycle is ending – Why central banks want you to believe inflation is temporary – Why fiat is “a bug in the system, not a feature” – Why TON, with its Telegram integration, is the most underrated trillion-dollar blockchain opportunity – Why billionaires are quietly buying Bitcoin In his view, the game is rigged and it’s time to play accordingly. 00:00 – TON partners with Telegram and Pavel Durov’s vision revealed. 02:00 – Manny Stotz explains why TON is crypto’s most underrated project. 04:30 – The insane story of Telegram: one billion users, zero funding. 07:00 – How Manny became President of TON Foundation. 09:30 – Pavel Durov: the GOAT of social media and free speech. 12:00 – Telegram’s shocking truth: only one product manager, Pavel himself. 15:00 – The secret genius of Nikolai Durov and TON’s whitepaper. 18:00 – VK vs Facebook: how the Durov brothers crushed Silicon Valley. 21:00 – “I’m not your lapdog, Mr. Putin”: Pavel’s bold stand against the FSB. 24:00 – How Telegram was born under surveillance and raids. 27:00 – Building Telegram in exile: Dubai, freedom and TON’s future. 30:00 – Why TON’s partnership with Telegram could change crypto forever. 34:00 – France investigates Pavel Durov: the West vs free speech. 38:00 – Did EU intelligence ask Durov to censor Romanian elections? 42:00 – Pavel posts explosive revelations while under investigation. 46:00 – The fight for freedom of speech at the core of TON and Telegram. 50:00 – Manny Stotz on Animoca, blockchain gaming and TON dominance. 54:00 – How TON serves the unbanked in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 58:00 – Billion-dollar crypto adoption: TON, Bitcoin, Solana and beyond. 01:02:00 – The dark side of fiat: hyperinflation from Zimbabwe to Venezuela. 01:06:00 – Why TON is positioned to lead the next crypto cycle. 01:10:00 – Manny compares Pavel Durov to Elon Musk’s vision. 01:14:00 – How governments fear TON’s unstoppable growth. 01:18:00 – The future of TON: global freedom, finance and innovation. 01:22:00 – Final verdict: Why Pavel Durov and TON may reshape the internet.

Mario Nawfal

1,017,537 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

Mario Nawfal

1,828,232 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten