Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

[ENG] 230406 VITA500 Zero CF Interview (01:40) OK: DM: GD: TB: source: #LE_SSERAFIM #르세라핌 #LE_SSERAFIM_UNFORGIVEN

fimsubs's profile picture

FIMSUBS | LE SSERAFIM

5,068 subscribers

14,833 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

#LE_SSERAFIM#르세라핌#LE_SSERAFIM_UNFORGIVEN
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

[Eng Sub] 250125 GOT7 Music Core Interview (1/2) GD — DM — 🚫No reuploading on any other platforms 🚫No cropping of watermark ✔️Credit if making contents #GOT7 #GOT7_WINTER_HEPTAGON #PYTHONonMusicCore #GOT7_PYTHON
2:17

[Eng Sub] 250125 GOT7 Music Core Interview (1/2) GD — DM — 🚫No reuploading on any other platforms 🚫No cropping of watermark ✔️Credit if making contents #GOT7 #GOT7_WINTER_HEPTAGON #PYTHONonMusicCore #GOT7_PYTHON

IGOT7subs -GOT7 Comeback-

19,139 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Jim Haslam: Covid Origins and Coronavirus Genetic Engineering — Manifold #77 Whether or not SARS-COV-2 was genetically engineered, it is technically possible to engineer similar pandemic viruses. Thanks to Jim Haslam for the interview. 00:00 - A quick note on my interview with Jim Haslam 03:40 - Introducing Jim Haslam, author of "COVID-19: Mystery Solved" 04:51 - The DARPA DEFUSE Grant Proposal 08:52 - Ralph Baric and Genetic Engineering of Coronaviruses 20:10 - Danielle Anderson and the Wuhan BSL-4 Lab 24:38 - The Role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak 29:28 - The Furin Cleavage Site Controversy 36:43 - NIAID Funding and the Wuhan Connection 40:53 - Capabilities and Limitations of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Baric's Lab 44:41 - The DEFUSE Grant and Wuhan Institute of Virology 48:22 - RaTG13 Genome and Its Implications 50:34 - Kristian Anderson's Alarming Discovery 01:00:42 - Feb. 1 Teleconference with Fauci & Baric; Feb. 3 NAS Meeting 01:19:41 - Unintentional vs. Intentional Engineering 01:21:28 - Tracing the Virus to Wuhan, Patient Zero, and the Role of Danielle Anderson 01:29:38 - Rocky Mountain Lab and Virus Processing 01:36:32 - Animal Models, Engineering Aerosol Transmission 01:42:23 - The Smoking Gun Email
2:34

Jim Haslam: Covid Origins and Coronavirus Genetic Engineering — Manifold #77 Whether or not SARS-COV-2 was genetically engineered, it is technically possible to engineer similar pandemic viruses. Thanks to Jim Haslam for the interview. 00:00 - A quick note on my interview with Jim Haslam 03:40 - Introducing Jim Haslam, author of "COVID-19: Mystery Solved" 04:51 - The DARPA DEFUSE Grant Proposal 08:52 - Ralph Baric and Genetic Engineering of Coronaviruses 20:10 - Danielle Anderson and the Wuhan BSL-4 Lab 24:38 - The Role of EcoHealth Alliance and Peter Daszak 29:28 - The Furin Cleavage Site Controversy 36:43 - NIAID Funding and the Wuhan Connection 40:53 - Capabilities and Limitations of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Baric's Lab 44:41 - The DEFUSE Grant and Wuhan Institute of Virology 48:22 - RaTG13 Genome and Its Implications 50:34 - Kristian Anderson's Alarming Discovery 01:00:42 - Feb. 1 Teleconference with Fauci & Baric; Feb. 3 NAS Meeting 01:19:41 - Unintentional vs. Intentional Engineering 01:21:28 - Tracing the Virus to Wuhan, Patient Zero, and the Role of Danielle Anderson 01:29:38 - Rocky Mountain Lab and Virus Processing 01:36:32 - Animal Models, Engineering Aerosol Transmission 01:42:23 - The Smoking Gun Email

steve hsu

34,464 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My Divot interview with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Apostle Neil L. Andersen. We talk about how to build a life of faith, what happens after death, dangers of ego, strength of humility, good vs evil, how he was called as an Apostle, feeling forgiveness, and being my dad. Timestamps: 01:14 — The Burden Everyone Carries in Life 02:23 — The Real Game of Life: Good vs Evil 08:23 — Growing Up on a Farm 09:31 — The Experience That Expanded His World 11:21 — From Self to Service 12:40 — Why Helping Others Creates Meaning 16:48 — Faith Is a Muscle 23:41 — How to Rebuild Faith When You’ve Lost It 27:19 — Why Humility Is the Source of Real Strength 30:22 — Speaking About Faith in a Modern World 32:54 — What Happens After Death 40:01 — The Danger of Ego and Recognition 45:08 — The Call That Changed His Life 53:04 — Becoming an Apostle 57:13 — His Core Responsibility 01:03:20 — The Hardest Part: Helping People in Pain 01:14:00 — Forgiveness: Why You’re Never Too Far Gone 01:18:13 — The One Idea He Would Teach the World 01:19:08 — How He Measures a Good Life Hashtags: #faith #faithjourney #forgiveness #purpose #meaningoflife #lifelessons #personalgrowth #selfimprovement #mindset #humility #service #familyvalues #fatherandson #spiritualgrowth #resilience #leadership #divotpodcast
1:19:50

My Divot interview with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Apostle Neil L. Andersen. We talk about how to build a life of faith, what happens after death, dangers of ego, strength of humility, good vs evil, how he was called as an Apostle, feeling forgiveness, and being my dad. Timestamps: 01:14 — The Burden Everyone Carries in Life 02:23 — The Real Game of Life: Good vs Evil 08:23 — Growing Up on a Farm 09:31 — The Experience That Expanded His World 11:21 — From Self to Service 12:40 — Why Helping Others Creates Meaning 16:48 — Faith Is a Muscle 23:41 — How to Rebuild Faith When You’ve Lost It 27:19 — Why Humility Is the Source of Real Strength 30:22 — Speaking About Faith in a Modern World 32:54 — What Happens After Death 40:01 — The Danger of Ego and Recognition 45:08 — The Call That Changed His Life 53:04 — Becoming an Apostle 57:13 — His Core Responsibility 01:03:20 — The Hardest Part: Helping People in Pain 01:14:00 — Forgiveness: Why You’re Never Too Far Gone 01:18:13 — The One Idea He Would Teach the World 01:19:08 — How He Measures a Good Life Hashtags: #faith #faithjourney #forgiveness #purpose #meaningoflife #lifelessons #personalgrowth #selfimprovement #mindset #humility #service #familyvalues #fatherandson #spiritualgrowth #resilience #leadership #divotpodcast

Derek Andersen

125,912 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Here's an edit of the Elon Musk interview hosted by Katherine Brodsky discussing a myriad of topics. This version boosts audio quality and reduces pauses and dead space by 33%. Thank you David Carbutt for the work! Timestamps: (00:00) The Journey of SpaceX and Tesla (01:06) Misunderstandings and Misinformation (03:42) The Role of Social Media in Free Speech (04:12) The Impact of Government Control on Media (06:32) The Evolution of Twitter and the Need for a Fresh Start (07:17) The Challenges of Moderation on Social Media Platforms (12:12) The Role of Citizen Journalism in Modern Media (17:45) The Future of Legacy Media (28:08) The Power of Amplifying Ideas and People (36:35) The Importance of Open-Mindedness and Self-Criticism (38:49) Community Notes and Open Source Data (39:58) The Role of Accuracy and Opinions in Posting (40:22) The Idea of a Sarcasm Detector (41:01) The Potential of AI in Enhancing Accuracy (42:39) The Future of AI and Deepfakes (44:59) The Vision for X as an All-in-One App (46:38) The Concept of Trust in Institutions (51:24) The Impact of Gene Editing on Humanity (55:42) The Challenge of Censorship and Free Speech (01:02:24) The Unusual Case of a Voice Doppelganger (01:07:35) Starting a Conversation: Texting and Simulations (01:08:43) Discussing Starship Launch and Future Plans (01:10:32) Engaging in Casual Conversations and Sharing Photos (01:11:55) Exploring the Idea of Expanding the Scope of Reality (01:13:27) Exploring the Concept of Simulation Theory (01:13:52) Discussing the Concept of AI in the Simulation (01:20:42) Addressing Questions about Ad Demonetization (01:23:11) Addressing Concerns about Doxxing and Harassment (01:30:47) Discussing the Monetization of Spaces (01:31:34) Discussing the Future of AI and OpenAI (01:35:17) Discussion on National Debt and AI (01:36:06) Involvement of Family Members (01:36:45) Questions and Answers (01:37:31) Impersonations and Voice Modulations (01:38:47) Discussion on Accents and Language Learning (01:41:14) Discussion on AI and Voice Imitation (01:46:45) Serious Discussion on AI and Social Media (01:51:27) Discussion on Physics and AI (01:58:18) Closing Remarks and Final Questions
1:59:51

Here's an edit of the Elon Musk interview hosted by Katherine Brodsky discussing a myriad of topics. This version boosts audio quality and reduces pauses and dead space by 33%. Thank you David Carbutt for the work! Timestamps: (00:00) The Journey of SpaceX and Tesla (01:06) Misunderstandings and Misinformation (03:42) The Role of Social Media in Free Speech (04:12) The Impact of Government Control on Media (06:32) The Evolution of Twitter and the Need for a Fresh Start (07:17) The Challenges of Moderation on Social Media Platforms (12:12) The Role of Citizen Journalism in Modern Media (17:45) The Future of Legacy Media (28:08) The Power of Amplifying Ideas and People (36:35) The Importance of Open-Mindedness and Self-Criticism (38:49) Community Notes and Open Source Data (39:58) The Role of Accuracy and Opinions in Posting (40:22) The Idea of a Sarcasm Detector (41:01) The Potential of AI in Enhancing Accuracy (42:39) The Future of AI and Deepfakes (44:59) The Vision for X as an All-in-One App (46:38) The Concept of Trust in Institutions (51:24) The Impact of Gene Editing on Humanity (55:42) The Challenge of Censorship and Free Speech (01:02:24) The Unusual Case of a Voice Doppelganger (01:07:35) Starting a Conversation: Texting and Simulations (01:08:43) Discussing Starship Launch and Future Plans (01:10:32) Engaging in Casual Conversations and Sharing Photos (01:11:55) Exploring the Idea of Expanding the Scope of Reality (01:13:27) Exploring the Concept of Simulation Theory (01:13:52) Discussing the Concept of AI in the Simulation (01:20:42) Addressing Questions about Ad Demonetization (01:23:11) Addressing Concerns about Doxxing and Harassment (01:30:47) Discussing the Monetization of Spaces (01:31:34) Discussing the Future of AI and OpenAI (01:35:17) Discussion on National Debt and AI (01:36:06) Involvement of Family Members (01:36:45) Questions and Answers (01:37:31) Impersonations and Voice Modulations (01:38:47) Discussion on Accents and Language Learning (01:41:14) Discussion on AI and Voice Imitation (01:46:45) Serious Discussion on AI and Social Media (01:51:27) Discussion on Physics and AI (01:58:18) Closing Remarks and Final Questions

Farzad 🇺🇸 🇮🇷

2,033,302 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

What if spinning up a blockchain was easier than launching a website? Jin Kwon ⛋ helped build Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️. Now he's back with Saga Intern, aiming to kill scarcity-based economics and make chain creation as simple as cloud compute. Infinite blockspace. Zero congestion. No bottlenecks. Full episode live now 🎧👇 ---------------- Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Jin's Story from Intel to Cosmos 05:10 - Creating and Growing Cosmos 07:45 - Scaling Chains 13:40 - Is Blockspace scarce? 15:28 - What is Saga? 20:50 - PoS with No Slashing 23:30 - Bridging & Liquidity Integration Layer 31:20 - Apps on Saga 33:27 - Interoperability 41:40 - 39:44 Bridging the Gap to Mainstream Adoption ---------------- DM us to join or sponsor the show 📨 business@teachmedefi.de
49:08

What if spinning up a blockchain was easier than launching a website? Jin Kwon ⛋ helped build Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️. Now he's back with Saga Intern, aiming to kill scarcity-based economics and make chain creation as simple as cloud compute. Infinite blockspace. Zero congestion. No bottlenecks. Full episode live now 🎧👇 ---------------- Timestamps: 00:00 - Intro 01:30 - Jin's Story from Intel to Cosmos 05:10 - Creating and Growing Cosmos 07:45 - Scaling Chains 13:40 - Is Blockspace scarce? 15:28 - What is Saga? 20:50 - PoS with No Slashing 23:30 - Bridging & Liquidity Integration Layer 31:20 - Apps on Saga 33:27 - Interoperability 41:40 - 39:44 Bridging the Gap to Mainstream Adoption ---------------- DM us to join or sponsor the show 📨 [email protected]

TEACHMEDEFI

128,846 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🔈BidCast - New Interview with Tuomas Holmberg 🦇🔊 from Collector Crypt on $CARDS 📌How gacha math bridges ~4% take rate to $CARDS 📌The firm's supply chain design + plan to in-source 📌Path towards ~20-25 mm / week volume on Pokemon & ~10mm / week on Sports Cards 📌... and how this bridges to 40-50 mm of profit / yr 📌3 exciting initiatives to drive rev & Web2 mindshare 📌Heuristics & guideline on tokenomics design + transparency Timestamps 👇 00:00 Opening 00:59 Introduction to Collector Crypt and Gacha Mechanism 03:52 Understanding the Gacha Experience and User Engagement 07:09 The Role of Community and Token Dynamics 09:58 Logistics of Card Deposits and Redemption 12:49 Scaling Operations and Market Strategy 15:57 Financial Insights and Future Projections 43:46 Market Dynamics and Growth Opportunities 46:39 Revenue Projections and Financial Strategies 48:18 Execution Challenges and Roadmap 53:58 User Experience and Community Engagement 59:01 Exploring the Sports Card Market 01:13:11 Innovative Features and Future Developments
1:28:24

🔈BidCast - New Interview with Tuomas Holmberg 🦇🔊 from Collector Crypt on $CARDS 📌How gacha math bridges ~4% take rate to $CARDS 📌The firm's supply chain design + plan to in-source 📌Path towards ~20-25 mm / week volume on Pokemon & ~10mm / week on Sports Cards 📌... and how this bridges to 40-50 mm of profit / yr 📌3 exciting initiatives to drive rev & Web2 mindshare 📌Heuristics & guideline on tokenomics design + transparency Timestamps 👇 00:00 Opening 00:59 Introduction to Collector Crypt and Gacha Mechanism 03:52 Understanding the Gacha Experience and User Engagement 07:09 The Role of Community and Token Dynamics 09:58 Logistics of Card Deposits and Redemption 12:49 Scaling Operations and Market Strategy 15:57 Financial Insights and Future Projections 43:46 Market Dynamics and Growth Opportunities 46:39 Revenue Projections and Financial Strategies 48:18 Execution Challenges and Roadmap 53:58 User Experience and Community Engagement 59:01 Exploring the Sports Card Market 01:13:11 Innovative Features and Future Developments

BidClub

19,682 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My full interview with Roman Chernin, Co-founder & Chief Business Officer of Nebius Nebius just signed a $17 billion deal with Microsoft and a $3 billion deal with Meta. These are two of the biggest tech companies on Earth - and they're coming to Nebius for AI infrastructure. But the company does so much more than that: - Full-stack AI cloud (data centers → software → managed services) - Nebius Token Factory Nebius Token Factory for managed inference & post-training - Partners include Shopify, Higgsfield, Jetbrains My 5 takeaways with Roman Chernin below - thanks for the conversation! Full interview also available on YT ⬇️ Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 01:47 - Overview of Nebius $NBIS 03:23 - Roman's background and role at Nebius 04:10 - The $17B Microsoft & $3B Meta deals 05:29 - Why hyperscalers trust Nebius over building in-house 07:06 - Nebius's full-stack approach: Data centers to managed services 08:39 - Customer segmentation: Hyperscalers & Frontier AI Labs vs AI Startups vs Enterprises 14:41 - Token Factory explained: Managed inference & post-training 17:41 - When to switch from closed-source to open-source models 20:59 - Real results: Process achieves 26% cost reduction 25:05 - Why developers love building on Nebius 28:40 - AI agents and the future of infrastructure interaction 32:22 - NVIDIA's Groq acquisition: What it means for inference 35:38 - Why AI adoption will surprise us
39:46

My full interview with Roman Chernin, Co-founder & Chief Business Officer of Nebius Nebius just signed a $17 billion deal with Microsoft and a $3 billion deal with Meta. These are two of the biggest tech companies on Earth - and they're coming to Nebius for AI infrastructure. But the company does so much more than that: - Full-stack AI cloud (data centers → software → managed services) - Nebius Token Factory Nebius Token Factory for managed inference & post-training - Partners include Shopify, Higgsfield, Jetbrains My 5 takeaways with Roman Chernin below - thanks for the conversation! Full interview also available on YT ⬇️ Timestamps: 00:00 - Introduction 01:47 - Overview of Nebius $NBIS 03:23 - Roman's background and role at Nebius 04:10 - The $17B Microsoft & $3B Meta deals 05:29 - Why hyperscalers trust Nebius over building in-house 07:06 - Nebius's full-stack approach: Data centers to managed services 08:39 - Customer segmentation: Hyperscalers & Frontier AI Labs vs AI Startups vs Enterprises 14:41 - Token Factory explained: Managed inference & post-training 17:41 - When to switch from closed-source to open-source models 20:59 - Real results: Process achieves 26% cost reduction 25:05 - Why developers love building on Nebius 28:40 - AI agents and the future of infrastructure interaction 32:22 - NVIDIA's Groq acquisition: What it means for inference 35:38 - Why AI adoption will surprise us

Elliot Garreffa

29,888 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery
1:43:41

BITCOIN RAILS #69: ZERO-KNOWLEDGE PROOFS FOR POST-QUANTUM BITCOIN | with Benedikt Bünz 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌿 SPOTIFY: While many Bitcoiners remain hopeful the network will embrace zero-knowledge proofs for protocol-level use cases, practical adoption has remained limited outside of BitVM and a handful of experimental proposals. Most of the world’s ZKP research has circled around Ethereum and other ecosystems, where significant resources have been dedicated to advancing these systems, particularly for scaling and privacy applications. One of the most notable contributors to this research is Benedikt Bünz ☕️ — professor of cryptography at NYU and collaborator of Dan Boneh, who together inarguably form one of the strongest blockchain-applied cryptography teams in the world. The pair recently announced they’ll be leading the new post-quantum cryptography unit localhost research — the first dedicated PQ research effort within a major Bitcoin development organization. With Benedikt leading the charge on the use of zero-knowledge proofs for post-quantum mitigation, the question emerges: will the post-quantum transition be the catalyst to finally bring zero-knowledge proofs to Bitcoin's core protocol? In more detail, Benedikt and I discuss: - Why ZKPs haven’t been widely adopted by the Bitcoin technical community — and why the threat of quantum computers may change that posture going forward - How ZKPs could be used for signature batching to address larger post-quantum signatures in Bitcoin’s post-quantum era - Why Bitcoiners will likely prioritize hash-based signatures as an initial post-quantum scheme — rather than more efficient but less proven alternatives (e.g., lattice-based) - How ZKPs have evolved over the last decade and may finally be ready for Bitcoin’s strict requirements around trust assumptions - Why Benedikt and Dan are teaming up with localhost research to create the first post-quantum cryptography unit within a major Bitcoin development organization + what they hope to accomplish This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin DeFi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox — an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 — Intro 00:22 — Benedikt's background 04:10 — How Benedikt got into Bitcoin and cryptography 07:42 — First ZK project: proving exchange solvency after Mt. Gox 16:01 — ZK proofs explained 27:43 — How security gets popular & ZK proofs in Bitcoin 35:49 — Other applications of ZK proofs for Bitcoin 40:15 — Why ZK proofs haven't been adopted in Bitcoin 50:46 — Why the Bitcoin post-quantum transition needs ZK proofs 01:07:00 — Cryptographic agility and why lattices win 01:18:00 — The size problem and how SNARKs solve it 01:33:57 — Proving a Bitcoin block in a laptop in 1.5 seconds 01:37:12 — Bitcoin as the primary quantum target 01:40:47 — ZK proofs for seed phrase recovery

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

19,872 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨🧠 INTERVIEW: WIKIPEDIA’S CO-FOUNDER SAYS THE INTERNET’S “TRUTH MACHINE” HAS BEEN CAPTURED Millions trust Wikipedia like gospel. But according to cofounder Larry Sanger, the platform has been quietly hijacked by anonymous editors, PR operatives, and intelligence-linked actors who use it to attack reputations, shape political narratives, and control what the public sees as “fact.” He says the world’s largest source of truth is no longer neutral. It has become a weapon against dissent, inconvenient truths, and anyone who challenges the establishment line. We break it down: •⁠ ⁠Why 85% of Wikipedia’s top editors hide behind anonymity •⁠ ⁠How intelligence agencies and billionaires exploit that weakness •⁠ ⁠Why dissenting voices are purged while political labels get slapped on enemies •⁠ ⁠How biased articles are shaping the training data for AI models •⁠ ⁠And why Elon Musk’s Grokipedia may become a truth-seeking alternative Sanger warns that when a billion people rely on a captured platform, the entire information ecosystem becomes vulnerable. 01:23 – Larry Sanger’s “Nine Theses” roller coaster 01:42 – Host says Wikipedia’s system was weaponized against him 03:16 – Anonymous editors running intelligence operations 03:33 – 85% of Wikipedia’s “cops” are anonymous 05:39 – Intelligence agencies and wealthy actors can bribe editors 07:26 – PR firms run a multimillion-dollar Wikipedia influence business 07:44 – “Protection money for a reputation” 09:29 – CIA and FBI caught editing pages through WikiScanner 11:11 – China and Russia influencing Wikipedia at scale 12:32 – LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok still trust Wikipedia 13:52 – The solution begins with “organizing the troops” 15:02 – Government interference is not the answer 16:44 – Control a few key accounts, control the narrative 17:25 – Wikipedia has taken a clear side in the Gaza War 18:15 – “Gaza Genocide” article title not remotely neutral 21:51 – Religious bias exposed in the “Yahweh” article 23:34 – 61 billion visits, a few hundred editors control global truth 25:14 – Wikipedia now dangerously centralized 31:47 – Platform captured by the establishment left 32:20 – Blacklisted sources: Fox News, Sputnik, and more 34:24 – Thesis 1: Stop using the word “consensus” 34:49 – Thesis 2: Allow competing articles and frameworks 41:00 – Readers must become the arbiters of their own truth 42:55 – Thesis 4: Restore strict Neutrality 58:24 – Thesis 5: Reveal identities of executive editors 01:00:20 – Thesis 6: Create a trust score and rating system 01:09:59 – Thesis 7: Abolish source blacklists 01:14:40 – Thesis 8: End indefinite bans and permanent exile 01:17:57 – Thesis 9: Adopt a real constitutional process 01:22:41 – Call to action: Sign the petition and start editing
1:25:11

🚨🧠 INTERVIEW: WIKIPEDIA’S CO-FOUNDER SAYS THE INTERNET’S “TRUTH MACHINE” HAS BEEN CAPTURED Millions trust Wikipedia like gospel. But according to cofounder Larry Sanger, the platform has been quietly hijacked by anonymous editors, PR operatives, and intelligence-linked actors who use it to attack reputations, shape political narratives, and control what the public sees as “fact.” He says the world’s largest source of truth is no longer neutral. It has become a weapon against dissent, inconvenient truths, and anyone who challenges the establishment line. We break it down: •⁠ ⁠Why 85% of Wikipedia’s top editors hide behind anonymity •⁠ ⁠How intelligence agencies and billionaires exploit that weakness •⁠ ⁠Why dissenting voices are purged while political labels get slapped on enemies •⁠ ⁠How biased articles are shaping the training data for AI models •⁠ ⁠And why Elon Musk’s Grokipedia may become a truth-seeking alternative Sanger warns that when a billion people rely on a captured platform, the entire information ecosystem becomes vulnerable. 01:23 – Larry Sanger’s “Nine Theses” roller coaster 01:42 – Host says Wikipedia’s system was weaponized against him 03:16 – Anonymous editors running intelligence operations 03:33 – 85% of Wikipedia’s “cops” are anonymous 05:39 – Intelligence agencies and wealthy actors can bribe editors 07:26 – PR firms run a multimillion-dollar Wikipedia influence business 07:44 – “Protection money for a reputation” 09:29 – CIA and FBI caught editing pages through WikiScanner 11:11 – China and Russia influencing Wikipedia at scale 12:32 – LLMs like ChatGPT and Grok still trust Wikipedia 13:52 – The solution begins with “organizing the troops” 15:02 – Government interference is not the answer 16:44 – Control a few key accounts, control the narrative 17:25 – Wikipedia has taken a clear side in the Gaza War 18:15 – “Gaza Genocide” article title not remotely neutral 21:51 – Religious bias exposed in the “Yahweh” article 23:34 – 61 billion visits, a few hundred editors control global truth 25:14 – Wikipedia now dangerously centralized 31:47 – Platform captured by the establishment left 32:20 – Blacklisted sources: Fox News, Sputnik, and more 34:24 – Thesis 1: Stop using the word “consensus” 34:49 – Thesis 2: Allow competing articles and frameworks 41:00 – Readers must become the arbiters of their own truth 42:55 – Thesis 4: Restore strict Neutrality 58:24 – Thesis 5: Reveal identities of executive editors 01:00:20 – Thesis 6: Create a trust score and rating system 01:09:59 – Thesis 7: Abolish source blacklists 01:14:40 – Thesis 8: End indefinite bans and permanent exile 01:17:57 – Thesis 9: Adopt a real constitutional process 01:22:41 – Call to action: Sign the petition and start editing

Mario Nawfal

1,639,725 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A $40 BC250 BOARD WITH 16GB GDDR6 GETS A GITHUB FIRMWARE FLASH, THE DEFAULT 8/8 CPU/GPU SPLIT REWRITES TO 0.5/15.5 AND OPENS 15.5GB OF UNIFIED MEMORY TO OLLAMA, DEAD CRYPTO HARDWARE JUST DOUBLED ITS AI CEILING 01:08 the operator points at the chart, "you only give 512 megs to the GPU part and that's reserved, that means all the rest of the RAM is available to either the CPU or the GPU" a BC250 ships from the factory with 16GB GDDR6 split 8/8 between Oberon CPU cores and the RDNA 2 iGPU, the iGPU only ever uses 4-5GB during inference, the other 3-4GB sits stranded SEC Bolt's firmware mod on the moth-enjoyer GitHub flashes a 0.5/15.5 split, the GPU reserves 512MB and 15.5GB falls into a unified pool that ollama treats as VRAM, qwen 3.6 14B at 4 bit fits with 2GB context headroom 15.5GB on a $40 board with a $40 CH347 flasher beats the $249 Jetson Orin Nano's 8GB by nearly 2x at 1/6th the price, the firmware is open source, the dump backup process takes 4 minutes per board your map's tier zero floor was the OptiPlex at $35-50 with iGPU only, the modded BC250 sits at the same $40 mark with 15.5GB of GDDR6 and an actual RDNA 2 GPU, the buyer who flashes once unlocks a 13B class local AI host for the price of a dinner the window is open, follow and bookmark before it closes
2:38

A $40 BC250 BOARD WITH 16GB GDDR6 GETS A GITHUB FIRMWARE FLASH, THE DEFAULT 8/8 CPU/GPU SPLIT REWRITES TO 0.5/15.5 AND OPENS 15.5GB OF UNIFIED MEMORY TO OLLAMA, DEAD CRYPTO HARDWARE JUST DOUBLED ITS AI CEILING 01:08 the operator points at the chart, "you only give 512 megs to the GPU part and that's reserved, that means all the rest of the RAM is available to either the CPU or the GPU" a BC250 ships from the factory with 16GB GDDR6 split 8/8 between Oberon CPU cores and the RDNA 2 iGPU, the iGPU only ever uses 4-5GB during inference, the other 3-4GB sits stranded SEC Bolt's firmware mod on the moth-enjoyer GitHub flashes a 0.5/15.5 split, the GPU reserves 512MB and 15.5GB falls into a unified pool that ollama treats as VRAM, qwen 3.6 14B at 4 bit fits with 2GB context headroom 15.5GB on a $40 board with a $40 CH347 flasher beats the $249 Jetson Orin Nano's 8GB by nearly 2x at 1/6th the price, the firmware is open source, the dump backup process takes 4 minutes per board your map's tier zero floor was the OptiPlex at $35-50 with iGPU only, the modded BC250 sits at the same $40 mark with 15.5GB of GDDR6 and an actual RDNA 2 GPU, the buyer who flashes once unlocks a 13B class local AI host for the price of a dinner the window is open, follow and bookmark before it closes

Antid

25,619 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

.Dean W. Ball is one of the most famous opponents of AI regulation, and co-author of America's AI strategy. But unlike many new AI commentators he's a true intellectual and a blogger at heart — not a shallow ideologue or corporate mouthpiece. So he doesn't wave away concerns and predict a smooth simple ride. In fact, for Dean an unpredictable or volatile future is the reason to take as few big steps now as possible. He fears the wrong regulations, deployed too early, would "in a Shakespearean fashion, bring about the world that we do not want." More specifically, premature regulation might lock us into addressing the wrong problem (e.g. rogue AI when the real issue is power concentration), with the wrong target (e.g. models rather than companies), through the wrong institutions (e.g. AI-specific bodies that are captured by industry), while making it harder to build the actual solutions we'll need (e.g. open source or legal mechanisms newly enabled by AI). I booked an interview with Dean so I could thoroughly read his Substack, get to grips with his worldview, and figure out why I often see things differently. We cover: We'll get superintelligence, but it will probably be steerable (00:01:54) AI won't be militarised fast (00:11:10) AI self-improvement matters but is no game changer (00:28:58) The case for regulating at the last possible moment (00:33:51) AI could destroy our fragile democratic equilibria. So why not freak out? (00:53:41) Why Dean fears AI will soon be way overregulated (01:04:10) How to handle the real risks with minimal collateral damage (01:16:23) Easy wins against AI misuse (01:28:27) A company would be sued for trillions if their AI caused a pandemic (01:49:43) Dean dislikes compute thresholds and would do this instead. (01:59:06) Dean expects a MAGA-Yudkowskyite alliance. But Doomers and E/accs are more alike than different. (02:14:40) A tactical case for focusing on present-day harms (02:29:16) Is there any way to get the US government to actually use AI in its work? (02:47:43) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below — enjoy!
2:57:11

.Dean W. Ball is one of the most famous opponents of AI regulation, and co-author of America's AI strategy. But unlike many new AI commentators he's a true intellectual and a blogger at heart — not a shallow ideologue or corporate mouthpiece. So he doesn't wave away concerns and predict a smooth simple ride. In fact, for Dean an unpredictable or volatile future is the reason to take as few big steps now as possible. He fears the wrong regulations, deployed too early, would "in a Shakespearean fashion, bring about the world that we do not want." More specifically, premature regulation might lock us into addressing the wrong problem (e.g. rogue AI when the real issue is power concentration), with the wrong target (e.g. models rather than companies), through the wrong institutions (e.g. AI-specific bodies that are captured by industry), while making it harder to build the actual solutions we'll need (e.g. open source or legal mechanisms newly enabled by AI). I booked an interview with Dean so I could thoroughly read his Substack, get to grips with his worldview, and figure out why I often see things differently. We cover: We'll get superintelligence, but it will probably be steerable (00:01:54) AI won't be militarised fast (00:11:10) AI self-improvement matters but is no game changer (00:28:58) The case for regulating at the last possible moment (00:33:51) AI could destroy our fragile democratic equilibria. So why not freak out? (00:53:41) Why Dean fears AI will soon be way overregulated (01:04:10) How to handle the real risks with minimal collateral damage (01:16:23) Easy wins against AI misuse (01:28:27) A company would be sued for trillions if their AI caused a pandemic (01:49:43) Dean dislikes compute thresholds and would do this instead. (01:59:06) Dean expects a MAGA-Yudkowskyite alliance. But Doomers and E/accs are more alike than different. (02:14:40) A tactical case for focusing on present-day harms (02:29:16) Is there any way to get the US government to actually use AI in its work? (02:47:43) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below — enjoy!

Rob Wiblin

28,859 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Ryan Lopopolo leads a team at OpenAI where the PM writes a PRD on Monday and ships a pull request by Friday. No human writes the code. Ryan Lopopolo broke it all down: 0:00 - "Code is a liability" 3:23 - Why your most expensive asset is now free 6:01 - "What's the point of roles anymore?" 8:04 - What replaces the PM/design/eng triangle 13:10 - 1M lines of code, zero written by humans 16:05 - Engineers can't touch the keyboard 18:13 - First month was 10x slower than solo 20:07 - Recursing 8 levels deep for one primitive 20:47 - PM writes PRD Monday, ships PR Friday 25:06 - The feature they had to trash 28:02 - How designers ship UI without a backend 31:40 - What's actually inside the harness 37:03 - Failing the build over curly quotes 40:02 - Inside Ryan's actual Codex setup 46:25 - The codebase that grades itself 50:49 - "A billion tokens a day or you're negligent" 52:19 - 350M tokens on a single PR 53:46 - GPT 5.2 changed everything overnight 57:00 - Every engineer is now a staff engineer 59:19 - The ego problem nobody talks about 1:00:39 - Monday morning roadmap for normal teams 1:08:19 - One skill to build this weekend 1:10:57 - Why one agent beats multi-agent
1:14:45

Ryan Lopopolo leads a team at OpenAI where the PM writes a PRD on Monday and ships a pull request by Friday. No human writes the code. Ryan Lopopolo broke it all down: 0:00 - "Code is a liability" 3:23 - Why your most expensive asset is now free 6:01 - "What's the point of roles anymore?" 8:04 - What replaces the PM/design/eng triangle 13:10 - 1M lines of code, zero written by humans 16:05 - Engineers can't touch the keyboard 18:13 - First month was 10x slower than solo 20:07 - Recursing 8 levels deep for one primitive 20:47 - PM writes PRD Monday, ships PR Friday 25:06 - The feature they had to trash 28:02 - How designers ship UI without a backend 31:40 - What's actually inside the harness 37:03 - Failing the build over curly quotes 40:02 - Inside Ryan's actual Codex setup 46:25 - The codebase that grades itself 50:49 - "A billion tokens a day or you're negligent" 52:19 - 350M tokens on a single PR 53:46 - GPT 5.2 changed everything overnight 57:00 - Every engineer is now a staff engineer 59:19 - The ego problem nobody talks about 1:00:39 - Monday morning roadmap for normal teams 1:08:19 - One skill to build this weekend 1:10:57 - Why one agent beats multi-agent

Aakash Gupta

150,044 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BITCOIN RAILS #62: BITCOIN'S 3 BIGGEST CHALLENGES | with Neha Narula Director of Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Neha Narula is the Director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, where she focuses on Bitcoin research and the broader design tradeoffs of decentralized money systems. Her work often centers on what Bitcoin gets right—and where it runs into hard limits—especially around scaling, decentralization, and how systems behave as global demand increases. In this interview, Neha and I explore longer-term risks to Bitcoin—including advancements in quantum computing and the implications of a diminishing block subsidy—as well as the ongoing challenge of scaling Bitcoin without losing access to self-custody. A thoughtful conversation on how Bitcoin may change in the coming years, we also explore its social and governance dynamics—including tensions within the development community over protocol changes, scaling philosophies, and the future direction of the system. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox— an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:17 Neha’s Origins 02:26 Bitcoin to MIT 04:40 Media Lab Culture and Mission 11:34 CBDCs as Digital Cash Debate 24:42 Funding Model and Bitcoin Security Budget 29:55 Reorg Risk and Quantum Computing 32:14 Bitcoin Dev Funding Map 42:49 Governance and Corporate Stakes 50:23 Quantum Tradeoffs Framework 56:02 Post Quantum Proposals 58:59 Prioritize PQ Transactions 01:00:54 Satoshi Coins Debate 01:02:12 Mining Incentives And Price 01:08:08 Corporate Funding And Governance 01:10:54 Scaling Self Custody And L2s 01:20:30 Bitcoin Kernel And Wrap Up
1:22:57

BITCOIN RAILS #62: BITCOIN'S 3 BIGGEST CHALLENGES | with Neha Narula Director of Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) 🔗 YOUTUBE: 🌱 SPOTIFY: Neha Narula is the Director of the MIT Digital Currency Initiative, where she focuses on Bitcoin research and the broader design tradeoffs of decentralized money systems. Her work often centers on what Bitcoin gets right—and where it runs into hard limits—especially around scaling, decentralization, and how systems behave as global demand increases. In this interview, Neha and I explore longer-term risks to Bitcoin—including advancements in quantum computing and the implications of a diminishing block subsidy—as well as the ongoing challenge of scaling Bitcoin without losing access to self-custody. A thoughtful conversation on how Bitcoin may change in the coming years, we also explore its social and governance dynamics—including tensions within the development community over protocol changes, scaling philosophies, and the future direction of the system. This episode of Bitcoin Rails is brought to you by: LayerTwo Labs LayerTwo Labs — developing research, software, and technologies for scaling Bitcoin via the integration of Drivechains (BIP 300/301) Hashi on Sui — a primitive for executing Bitcoin Defi transactions, without having to trust a federated bridge or other centralized entity BitBox BitBox— an open-source Bitcoin-only hardware wallet, with smooth UX and no compromises on security. Check out Bitbox [dot] swiss and use code BITCOINRAILS to get a discount TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro 00:17 Neha’s Origins 02:26 Bitcoin to MIT 04:40 Media Lab Culture and Mission 11:34 CBDCs as Digital Cash Debate 24:42 Funding Model and Bitcoin Security Budget 29:55 Reorg Risk and Quantum Computing 32:14 Bitcoin Dev Funding Map 42:49 Governance and Corporate Stakes 50:23 Quantum Tradeoffs Framework 56:02 Post Quantum Proposals 58:59 Prioritize PQ Transactions 01:00:54 Satoshi Coins Debate 01:02:12 Mining Incentives And Price 01:08:08 Corporate Funding And Governance 01:10:54 Scaling Self Custody And L2s 01:20:30 Bitcoin Kernel And Wrap Up

Isabel Foxen Duke⚡️

24,580 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

My best interview in some time. Rohin Shah leads AGI alignment/safety at DeepMind. And he has a lot of spicy personal takes: We probably won’t get catastrophic misalignment (00:49) Safety 'commitments' have severe limitations (10:38) The intelligence explosion probably isn't imminent (1:52:44) Why he's not working to pause AI advances (51:44) Pre-deployment evals aren't the right focus (for catastrophic risks) (37:41) Signalling concern for safety sometimes diverts resources from actually making AI safe (01:09:51) Reading AI thoughts is v useful for safety – and we'll probably be able to for years to come (54:17) Governance is somewhat more likely to be the bottleneck than alignment (43:55) Rohin's team doesn't have a veto, and that's OK (27:36) Central banks are a promising model for regulating AI (33:34) Also: Google DeepMind's actual plan for building AGI safely (1:40:29) How external researchers can positively influence big AI companies (2:21:55) The roles GDM most needs to hire for (2:37:03) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below - enjoy! (Rohin Shah)
2:48:26

My best interview in some time. Rohin Shah leads AGI alignment/safety at DeepMind. And he has a lot of spicy personal takes: We probably won’t get catastrophic misalignment (00:49) Safety 'commitments' have severe limitations (10:38) The intelligence explosion probably isn't imminent (1:52:44) Why he's not working to pause AI advances (51:44) Pre-deployment evals aren't the right focus (for catastrophic risks) (37:41) Signalling concern for safety sometimes diverts resources from actually making AI safe (01:09:51) Reading AI thoughts is v useful for safety – and we'll probably be able to for years to come (54:17) Governance is somewhat more likely to be the bottleneck than alignment (43:55) Rohin's team doesn't have a veto, and that's OK (27:36) Central banks are a promising model for regulating AI (33:34) Also: Google DeepMind's actual plan for building AGI safely (1:40:29) How external researchers can positively influence big AI companies (2:21:55) The roles GDM most needs to hire for (2:37:03) On the 80,000 Hours Podcast. Links below - enjoy! (Rohin Shah)

Rob Wiblin

157,179 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: RUSSIA IS BLEEDING OUT FROM THE INSIDE Power grids exploding. Soldiers unpaid. Cities running on generators. Putin says Russia’s economy is untouchable. Konstantin from Inside Russia says that’s a lie. He lived it, and what he describes sounds less like strength and more like survival on borrowed time. We cover: •⁠ ⁠Why Western sanctions are finally cutting off the oxygen •⁠ ⁠How oil giants like Rosneft and Lukoil are scrambling for cash •⁠ ⁠What life looks like when prices rise and supplies vanish overnight •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s best engineers and developers are leaving faster than they can be replaced •⁠ ⁠And how one wrong move could send the entire system crashing Konstantin says Russia’s economy isn’t dying quietly. It’s bleeding out in real time, and Putin can’t stop it. 02:02 – “Moscow is not Russia,” wealth versus decay beyond the capital 03:55 – From wild 90s freedom to Putin’s tightening grip 05:47 – The social contract: stay quiet and live comfortably 07:09 – The invasion ends that contract overnight 07:20 – The economic panic as companies flee 08:30 – Competing narratives: collapse or resilience 09:17 – How Russia stumbled into a war it did not plan for 10:50 – Shock and chaos among Russian officials 12:55 – Propaganda scrambles to invent justifications 14:30 – The instant exodus of Western companies 16:30 – Ikea, Apple, McDonald’s, and the first wave of panic 17:28 – Russia forbids dollar withdrawals to stop the run 18:40 – How Putin’s “war economy” kept the system alive 19:16 – Oil prices surge, saving Russia for two years 20:22 – Who blew up Nord Stream and who benefited most 21:04 – Why the U.S. gained as Europe lost Russian gas 22:19 – Decades of cheap energy end overnight 23:28 – How Russia gave Europe’s market to America 24:11 – The self-inflicted wound that wrecked Gazprom’s future 25:25 – The economic unraveling begins 26:25 – The perfect storm of sanctions, exodus, and brain drain 28:05 – Millions leave, the professionals among them 29:10 – War spending drains the “savings account” 30:12 – Putin’s reserves are drying up 31:48 – GDP myths and fake data inside Russia 32:25 – The illusion of growth built on war production 33:44 – Military factories slow and layoffs begin 35:03 – “The party’s over,” Russia hits zero growth 35:45 – Why Putin still refuses to end the war 37:29 – The Titanic analogy: lights on, hull already flooded 40:00 – Blackouts, shortages, and the slow collapse 42:00 – Siemens leaves, turbines fail, power plants decay 43:12 – Why China cannot replace Western tech 44:40 – The lagging effect of sanctions now hitting home 45:10 – Putin escalates war as protests begin to spread 46:50 – Early sparks of unrest across Russian cities 47:55 – Prices soar, infrastructure breaks down 49:01 – Fear inside Putin’s own circle grows 50:36 – Why he cannot stop the war without losing power 52:05 – The danger of returning soldiers and shrinking spoils 52:58 – Why the “territory win” is a poisoned prize 54:30 – Putin’s miscalculation as NATO grows stronger 56:20 – Mario challenges NATO’s role and the red line argument 57:55 – Konstantin’s rebuttal: “Diplomacy, not invasion” 59:03 – The myth of NATO encirclement 01:01:46 – How Putin turned NATO from partner to enemy for politics 01:03:02 – Why he really invaded Ukraine: falling ratings and stagnation 01:05:33 – The plan for a quick regime change gone wrong 01:06:52 – “He wanted control, not blood,” but the war trapped him 01:07:29 – Mario proposes future debates with data-driven experts
1:08:50

🚨🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: RUSSIA IS BLEEDING OUT FROM THE INSIDE Power grids exploding. Soldiers unpaid. Cities running on generators. Putin says Russia’s economy is untouchable. Konstantin from Inside Russia says that’s a lie. He lived it, and what he describes sounds less like strength and more like survival on borrowed time. We cover: •⁠ ⁠Why Western sanctions are finally cutting off the oxygen •⁠ ⁠How oil giants like Rosneft and Lukoil are scrambling for cash •⁠ ⁠What life looks like when prices rise and supplies vanish overnight •⁠ ⁠Why Russia’s best engineers and developers are leaving faster than they can be replaced •⁠ ⁠And how one wrong move could send the entire system crashing Konstantin says Russia’s economy isn’t dying quietly. It’s bleeding out in real time, and Putin can’t stop it. 02:02 – “Moscow is not Russia,” wealth versus decay beyond the capital 03:55 – From wild 90s freedom to Putin’s tightening grip 05:47 – The social contract: stay quiet and live comfortably 07:09 – The invasion ends that contract overnight 07:20 – The economic panic as companies flee 08:30 – Competing narratives: collapse or resilience 09:17 – How Russia stumbled into a war it did not plan for 10:50 – Shock and chaos among Russian officials 12:55 – Propaganda scrambles to invent justifications 14:30 – The instant exodus of Western companies 16:30 – Ikea, Apple, McDonald’s, and the first wave of panic 17:28 – Russia forbids dollar withdrawals to stop the run 18:40 – How Putin’s “war economy” kept the system alive 19:16 – Oil prices surge, saving Russia for two years 20:22 – Who blew up Nord Stream and who benefited most 21:04 – Why the U.S. gained as Europe lost Russian gas 22:19 – Decades of cheap energy end overnight 23:28 – How Russia gave Europe’s market to America 24:11 – The self-inflicted wound that wrecked Gazprom’s future 25:25 – The economic unraveling begins 26:25 – The perfect storm of sanctions, exodus, and brain drain 28:05 – Millions leave, the professionals among them 29:10 – War spending drains the “savings account” 30:12 – Putin’s reserves are drying up 31:48 – GDP myths and fake data inside Russia 32:25 – The illusion of growth built on war production 33:44 – Military factories slow and layoffs begin 35:03 – “The party’s over,” Russia hits zero growth 35:45 – Why Putin still refuses to end the war 37:29 – The Titanic analogy: lights on, hull already flooded 40:00 – Blackouts, shortages, and the slow collapse 42:00 – Siemens leaves, turbines fail, power plants decay 43:12 – Why China cannot replace Western tech 44:40 – The lagging effect of sanctions now hitting home 45:10 – Putin escalates war as protests begin to spread 46:50 – Early sparks of unrest across Russian cities 47:55 – Prices soar, infrastructure breaks down 49:01 – Fear inside Putin’s own circle grows 50:36 – Why he cannot stop the war without losing power 52:05 – The danger of returning soldiers and shrinking spoils 52:58 – Why the “territory win” is a poisoned prize 54:30 – Putin’s miscalculation as NATO grows stronger 56:20 – Mario challenges NATO’s role and the red line argument 57:55 – Konstantin’s rebuttal: “Diplomacy, not invasion” 59:03 – The myth of NATO encirclement 01:01:46 – How Putin turned NATO from partner to enemy for politics 01:03:02 – Why he really invaded Ukraine: falling ratings and stagnation 01:05:33 – The plan for a quick regime change gone wrong 01:06:52 – “He wanted control, not blood,” but the war trapped him 01:07:29 – Mario proposes future debates with data-driven experts

Mario Nawfal

2,263,753 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 PARTNERSHIP INTERVIEW: TON EX-PRESIDENT ON TELEGRAM’S PAVEL DUROV, THE FUTURE OF CRYPTO, AND WHY TON COULD HIT $1 TRILLION. He is the largest investor in Animoca, largest investor in TON, and one of crypto’s biggest whales A friend of Telegram’s Pavel Durov, Manuel Stotz stepped down as the President of TON Blockchain (launched by Telegram) to launch the world’s first TON Digital Asset Treasury. What Michael Saylor did with Bitcoin, and Tom Lee did with ETH, Manny is doing with TON. We discuss: – Why the 40-year debt supercycle is ending – Why central banks want you to believe inflation is temporary – Why fiat is “a bug in the system, not a feature” – Why TON, with its Telegram integration, is the most underrated trillion-dollar blockchain opportunity – Why billionaires are quietly buying Bitcoin In his view, the game is rigged and it’s time to play accordingly. 00:00 – TON partners with Telegram and Pavel Durov’s vision revealed. 02:00 – Manny Stotz explains why TON is crypto’s most underrated project. 04:30 – The insane story of Telegram: one billion users, zero funding. 07:00 – How Manny became President of TON Foundation. 09:30 – Pavel Durov: the GOAT of social media and free speech. 12:00 – Telegram’s shocking truth: only one product manager, Pavel himself. 15:00 – The secret genius of Nikolai Durov and TON’s whitepaper. 18:00 – VK vs Facebook: how the Durov brothers crushed Silicon Valley. 21:00 – “I’m not your lapdog, Mr. Putin”: Pavel’s bold stand against the FSB. 24:00 – How Telegram was born under surveillance and raids. 27:00 – Building Telegram in exile: Dubai, freedom and TON’s future. 30:00 – Why TON’s partnership with Telegram could change crypto forever. 34:00 – France investigates Pavel Durov: the West vs free speech. 38:00 – Did EU intelligence ask Durov to censor Romanian elections? 42:00 – Pavel posts explosive revelations while under investigation. 46:00 – The fight for freedom of speech at the core of TON and Telegram. 50:00 – Manny Stotz on Animoca, blockchain gaming and TON dominance. 54:00 – How TON serves the unbanked in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 58:00 – Billion-dollar crypto adoption: TON, Bitcoin, Solana and beyond. 01:02:00 – The dark side of fiat: hyperinflation from Zimbabwe to Venezuela. 01:06:00 – Why TON is positioned to lead the next crypto cycle. 01:10:00 – Manny compares Pavel Durov to Elon Musk’s vision. 01:14:00 – How governments fear TON’s unstoppable growth. 01:18:00 – The future of TON: global freedom, finance and innovation. 01:22:00 – Final verdict: Why Pavel Durov and TON may reshape the internet.
1:14:05

🚨 PARTNERSHIP INTERVIEW: TON EX-PRESIDENT ON TELEGRAM’S PAVEL DUROV, THE FUTURE OF CRYPTO, AND WHY TON COULD HIT $1 TRILLION. He is the largest investor in Animoca, largest investor in TON, and one of crypto’s biggest whales A friend of Telegram’s Pavel Durov, Manuel Stotz stepped down as the President of TON Blockchain (launched by Telegram) to launch the world’s first TON Digital Asset Treasury. What Michael Saylor did with Bitcoin, and Tom Lee did with ETH, Manny is doing with TON. We discuss: – Why the 40-year debt supercycle is ending – Why central banks want you to believe inflation is temporary – Why fiat is “a bug in the system, not a feature” – Why TON, with its Telegram integration, is the most underrated trillion-dollar blockchain opportunity – Why billionaires are quietly buying Bitcoin In his view, the game is rigged and it’s time to play accordingly. 00:00 – TON partners with Telegram and Pavel Durov’s vision revealed. 02:00 – Manny Stotz explains why TON is crypto’s most underrated project. 04:30 – The insane story of Telegram: one billion users, zero funding. 07:00 – How Manny became President of TON Foundation. 09:30 – Pavel Durov: the GOAT of social media and free speech. 12:00 – Telegram’s shocking truth: only one product manager, Pavel himself. 15:00 – The secret genius of Nikolai Durov and TON’s whitepaper. 18:00 – VK vs Facebook: how the Durov brothers crushed Silicon Valley. 21:00 – “I’m not your lapdog, Mr. Putin”: Pavel’s bold stand against the FSB. 24:00 – How Telegram was born under surveillance and raids. 27:00 – Building Telegram in exile: Dubai, freedom and TON’s future. 30:00 – Why TON’s partnership with Telegram could change crypto forever. 34:00 – France investigates Pavel Durov: the West vs free speech. 38:00 – Did EU intelligence ask Durov to censor Romanian elections? 42:00 – Pavel posts explosive revelations while under investigation. 46:00 – The fight for freedom of speech at the core of TON and Telegram. 50:00 – Manny Stotz on Animoca, blockchain gaming and TON dominance. 54:00 – How TON serves the unbanked in Africa, Asia and Latin America. 58:00 – Billion-dollar crypto adoption: TON, Bitcoin, Solana and beyond. 01:02:00 – The dark side of fiat: hyperinflation from Zimbabwe to Venezuela. 01:06:00 – Why TON is positioned to lead the next crypto cycle. 01:10:00 – Manny compares Pavel Durov to Elon Musk’s vision. 01:14:00 – How governments fear TON’s unstoppable growth. 01:18:00 – The future of TON: global freedom, finance and innovation. 01:22:00 – Final verdict: Why Pavel Durov and TON may reshape the internet.

Mario Nawfal

1,017,537 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support
1:06:33

🚨🇺🇦 INTERVIEW: THE FALL OF POKROVSK - UKRAINE’S BIGGEST LOSS OF THE WAR Ukraine’s strongest fortress in the east is about to fall In the meantime, Ukraine is running out of Patriot missiles, struggling to get Tomahawks, while Russia continues to incrementally gain territory Will Trump and the EU turn things around? Denys Davydov, one of Ukraine’s most trusted military voices, doesn’t think so… We discuss: •⁠ ⁠How Russian glide bombs and drone swarms wiped out entire brigades •⁠ ⁠Why Ukraine’s Patriot systems are nearly empty and running on scraps •⁠ ⁠How U.S. Tomahawks can help but won’t turn the tide •⁠ ⁠And what happens next if the West doesn’t escalate support immediately Captain Deny warns the fall of Pokrovsk is a turning point, and the next few months will decide whether Ukraine stands or falls. 01:10 – Why glide bombs are changing the battlefield 01:32 – Pokrovsk’s fall could make Donbas indefensible 02:10 – Why Russia wants Ukraine as a pro-Russian puppet state 03:00 – The fight for Pokrovsk and what’s at stake 04:15 – 80% of Pokrovsk now infiltrated by Russian infantry 06:20 – Why Ukrainian evacuation came too late 07:35 – Special forces landed, but impact minimal 08:05 – Pokrovsk’s fall would cripple Ukraine’s economy and supply lines 09:30 – Ukraine counterattacking in the north, holding back collapse 10:15 – Why Putin won’t accept any U.S.-brokered peace deal 11:22 – Trump’s proposal for Ukraine to give up Donbas and freeze the war 12:25 – Why Ukraine refuses to surrender territory 13:10 – Could European peacekeepers change the equation 14:25 – The front line is too vast to control 15:10 – Ukraine’s limited resources and fading options 16:15 – Why Davydov says Ukraine can’t retake Crimea or Donbas 17:20 – “Only a Russian collapse can end this war” 18:05 – Casualties rising on both sides 19:00 – Ukraine now conscripting civilians from the streets 19:45 – Russia’s manpower advantage 8-to-1 20:05 – How Ukraine still holds despite being outnumbered 21:40 – Ukraine fighting to preserve identity, not just land 22:40 – Why surrender would erase Ukrainian culture 23:05 – Can Tomahawks or new U.S. weapons change the war 23:50 – Davydov says Tomahawks are “mostly political theater” 24:45 – Sanctions hurt but are short-lived without enforcement 25:25 – Flamingo vs Neptune: Ukraine’s missile problem 27:00 – Why Russia has no incentive to freeze the lines 28:10 – Keeping 800,000 soldiers busy keeps Putin’s regime stable 29:10 – War fatigue in Russia isn’t enough to stop the Kremlin 30:05 – Russia’s economy built to survive sanctions 31:35 – China and Turkey keeping Russia’s trade alive 33:05 – Trump’s new sanctions on Rosneft and Lukoil 34:10 – Davydov warns sanctions will be bypassed within months 34:55 – “Cheap oil is financially addictive” 35:40 – What Ukraine needs now: guarantees, not promises 36:25 – The limits of Western aid and the illusion of support 37:45 – Why Europe still buys Russian energy 38:30 – Davydov says Ukraine’s only hope is time and attrition 39:55 – The Black Swan scenario: another Prigozhin moment 40:40 – Why Putin fears his soldiers returning home more than NATO 42:15 – Western societies value life, Russia values endurance 43:30 – The roots of the war: invasion, NATO, and broken promises 45:15 – Crimea was seized while Ukraine was neutral 47:00 – Why Davydov says NATO is weaker than people think 48:30 – NATO’s hesitation vs. Russia’s aggression 49:55 – “Putin used NATO as an excuse to attack” 50:35 – Russia’s justification: “protecting Donbas” 52:20 – Why Ukraine can never be neutral 53:05 – The Monroe Doctrine argument and U.S. hypocrisy 54:00 – Denys: NATO threat to Russia was zero 55:00 – Why Russia’s war is ideological, not defensive 56:45 – China says it will never let Russia lose 57:50 – Beijing’s fear of a U.S. victory 58:20 – Trump’s opportunity: make China and Russia compete 59:30 – The U.S. still holding back military power 01:00:25 – Europe funding both sides of the war 01:01:20 – How fast Ukraine can train F-16 and A-10 pilots 01:02:00 – Why Ukraine needs 300 fighter jets to win air superiority 01:03:00 – Patriot systems nearly depleted 01:04:45 – “Without air defense, every village can be erased” 01:06:20 – Closing thoughts: no peace without pressure, no survival without support

Mario Nawfal

1,828,232 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten