Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Eric Weinstein declared open season on string theory's old guard: "You and I have unfinished business." He calls out the most aggressive defenders—Lubos Motl, Michio Kaku, Leonard Susskind, Jeff Harvey, Michael Duff, Andy Strominger, Cumrun Vafa—for allegedly destroying 40 years of competing ideas in physics while claiming "nothing else... exists." Now, as cracks appear, Weinstein sees "theoretical retconning" and people "running for the exits": - "It's like Shaggy: It wasn't me." - "Weekend at Lenny's" — protecting a 40-year startup with zero MVP, no investor calls, endless runway. - The sociology? "Anti-science" that should be "hunted and removed with extreme prejudice." He wants a public reckoning: Susskind, Witten, Kaku & co. in a room with the people whose careers/funding they allegedly torpedoed—plus referees like Nima Arkani-Hamed, Edward Frenkel, Peter Woit—to finally ask: "What did we just do for 40 years?" "We're watching the beginning of the collapse." Is string theory's long reign finally facing its Lehman moment—or is this just another round of physics drama?show more

Camus

451,274 subscribers

39,551 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

🚨 BREAKING: Two of the most technically qualified scientists to ever engage with the UFO mystery sat down together for the first time: Dr. Eric Davis, astrophysics PhD who formally investigated the crash retrieval program through classified government channels and Dr. Eric Weinstein (), Harvard math PhD and founder of physics theory, Geometric Unity. Davis confirms that he personally interviewed 5 direct crash retrieval program employees at two legacy aerospace companies (one being TRW, acquired by Northrop) and that the United States holds between 10 and 40 UFOs in its direct possession. He also describes discussing UFOs with George H.W. Bush directly and Jimmy Carter getting briefed on the subject. Finally, Davis says the program only consists of Aerospace engineers. Weinstein's response: if these craft of non-human origin defy the laws of physics, you need top theoretical physicists on the program. Weinstein says either the people running it are criminally incompetent or there are no craft. Sparks flew.🚨 This is the conversation I have been trying to make happen for years. Eric Davis is one of the most credentialed investigator of the UFO crash retrieval program alive with an eidetic memory. Astrophysics PhD from the University of Arizona, 30 years in the field, security clearances through AAWSAP, formally deputized by the DIA under program manager James Lacatski (who himself claims he has stepped inside a UFO and breached the hull). Eric Weinstein is one of the most technically gifted minds outside the classified world, someone Davis himself identified as one of only three people technical and heterodox enough to engage with this material. I put them in a room and let them go at it. This conversation was nothing short of historic. Bombshell Details: Davis Says Roswell Was Real and He Confirmed It Officially: Davis traces his investigation to 1996 at Robert Bigelow's NIDS. Astronaut Ed Mitchell told him Admiral Thomas Wilson, then J2 on the Joint Chiefs, independently verified the 1947 Corona crash was a real non-human craft. Davis later used his DIA credentials through AAWSAP to reach the programmatic level of the operation. His conviction: 100%. Weinstein says he has talked to too many credible people to dismiss it, but has never seen one piece of incontrovertible proof. Davis Interviewed Program Workers. None Were Physicists: Davis met five people from one legacy aerospace company on the program. A material scientist who spent two decades on it. A TRW source who ran the SCIF at Wright-Patterson with access to intact craft in a secured hangar. Not one of Grusch's 40 firsthand witnesses is a theoretical physicist. Davis confirms none of his contacts were either. Weinstein compares this to performing Beethoven's Fifth with accountants and boxers. Eight Decades of Reverse Engineering. Zero Results: Davis's senior VP source confirmed no functional progress after eight decades. They could see how craft were constructed at the nanoscale. Could not reproduce any of it. Davis asked: where are your physicists? Answer: we never had any. Weinstein calls this a two-line proof. If it defies the laws of physics and you have no physicists, you are either the dumbest operation in history or there is nothing to reverse engineer. Weinstein Tells Davis His Physics Won't Work: Davis has published on warp drives and traversable wormholes within general relativity. Weinstein tells him directly: none of it will work. Davis accepts this. Weinstein says if craft break known physics, the answer is not squeezing exotic scenarios out of Einstein. The answer is Einstein is incomplete. Davis agrees. The debate becomes a collaboration. The Golden Age of Gravity Research Vanished in the 1970s: Weinstein identifies a 1971 Australian intelligence document naming physicists like Arnowitt, Desser, Dyson, and Oppenheimer in what reads like a Manhattan Project for Gravity and exotic propulsion. Two apparent cutouts funded work through Bryce DeWitt at UNC and Lewis Witten at a facility called RIAS inside the Martin Company. Sheldon Glashow and Solomon Lefschitz worked there. Then the trail goes cold. Davis noticed the same disappearance in graduate school. No one had an answer. String Theory as a Weapon Against Frontier Physics: After a Princeton junior designed a working atomic weapon from public sources, theoretical physics became too dangerous to leave in the open. String theory consumed the field. 42 years, zero experimental predictions. The Biden White House told Andreessen and Horowitz directly that entire areas of physics were classified in the nuclear era. Davis says he always thought string theory's dominance and the absence of physicists on the crash retrieval program were connected. Weinstein agrees. Weinstein Finds Gravity Hidden in the Strong Nuclear Force: Lazar's "gravity wave A" claim sounds like garbage. Weinstein treats it as garbled proximity information. He identifies a formal possibility: the theta term from QCD, based on the Pontriagin class, transgresses to a Chern-Simons functional: the closest known Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert, which governs gravity. Davis calls it remarkable. Weinstein believes this is the first time the connection has been stated publicly. Renaissance Technologies as the Possible Physics Brain Trust: If a secret physics program exists, track where frontier physicists cluster. Renaissance Technologies hires differential geometers and topologists. Sits next to Brookhaven National Lab. Draws from SUNY Stony Brook, where C.N. Yang was based. Returns resemble state-sponsored performance. Weinstein told Jim Simons before his death that Chern-Simons theory is the closest Lagrangian to Einstein-Hilbert. Simons invited him to Stony Brook for a year, then asked where he would find the funding. He was worth over $20 billion. The Wilson-Davis Notes Are Confirmed Authentic: Davis confirms the typewritten notes are real, legitimate, and 100% accurate. They describe former J2 Admiral Wilson being denied access to a crash retrieval program inside a private aerospace company funded from his own DIA budget. He was told he lacked need-to-know and met with Davis out of frustration. Davis wants blanket immunity to say everything about this meeting but confirms the notes are real. Why This Matters: These two arrive from opposite directions and land on the same problem. Davis has total certainty non-human craft exist in American possession. Weinstein cannot construct a single theory that explains the full landscape of claims and missing evidence. Both say the absence of theoretical physicists is indefensible. Davis wants access to the hardware. Weinstein wants the right minds inserted. The question Davis asks: let us in. The question Weinstein asks is sharper: if you will not let physicists in, what exactly are you protecting? Full conversation covers all of this and much more. Special thanks to Missileman for co-hosting! One of the most important episodes we have ever done live now 👇

Jesse Michels

308,922 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

"Very often what happens is that the architects die, and they leave a zombie. We seem to be in a zombie era." The whole time I was watching the discussion between Jesse Michels and Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis, I felt like there was some darker thing lurking beneath the surface that connects the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics as a scientific discipline, the extreme secrecy surrounding the alleged UAP crash retrieval/reverse engineering program and the lack of any theoretical physicists working the problem, and the government's stated intention to control (per Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸) the future of AI -- a future where there's no point investing in AI startups because “we [the government] are going to make sure that AI is going to be a function of two or three large companies. We will directly regulate and control those companies. There will be no startups.” And there's the other part Andreessen recounted from his White House meeting. He was told by the [Biden] administration that "During the Cold War, we [the federal government] classified entire areas of physics and took them out of the research community — entire branches of physics basically went dark and didn't proceed. If we decide we need to [for AI/math], we're going to do the same thing." Take a minute and think about that, because it's actually chilling. A clear precedent has been cited here -- one none of us knew about before Andreessen brought it to our attention -- and it raises two big questions: 1) Why? 2) HOW? Weinstein returns multiple times in this episode to the diminishingly small number of people who have the capacity to operate at the highest levels of physics and math. And whenever you have a small number of people who act as the natural gating function for something incredibly powerful, it's not a leap to imagine an additional layer of control being placed on them by pressure from outside. Whether that's through legal threats like "born secret," NDAs, direct threats of physical harm, money, regulation, etc., there are ways to lock down the gatekeepers so that they never do the thing -- at least not in public -- that the most powerful people in the world don't want them to do. Weinstein kept saying, about both the seemingly intentional stagnation of physics and the lack of physicists working the UAP problem, "this makes no sense." But it does make sense if you shift the frame to, "they don't want us to find the answers and are actively trying to stop us." The feeling I kept getting as I watched this fascinating discussion was that the legacy crash retrieval program used to have a lot more direct oversight and funding decades ago, but that the compartmentalization and secrecy around it turned it into more and more of an oxbow lake, and that as it got cut off from the conventional scientific community and defense establishment, it became more secretive, less well-funded, and less coordinated. So it kind of became its own siloed-off thing that fewer and fewer people knew about, but the people who did still know protected the territory fiercely. And then came the era of AAWSAP and AATIP and UAPTF, and without the deep, secret, institutional knowledge held by members of the legacy program, they tried to piece together what had happened in the past while not being able to penetrate the sort of firewall that existed partially because of controlled secrecy, and partially because of the firewalling effect of time. They were doing a lot of cold case file work, while running into the deepest of deep state secrecy efforts. That secrecy, at least based on my reading of the situation, was instituted decades ago, when the atomic-era scientific community (mostly the same group of geniuses that were at the top of the Manhattan Project) got together and -- probably at the behest of of the US government -- decided physics was becoming too dangerous if it continued down the path that it was on. So, as my spitball theory goes, they intentionally beached the entire enterprise on the shoals of string theory and quantized gravity and all the stuff Weinstein talks about everywhere he goes -- the "dogs that won't hunt" that are also "the only game in town." The very theories that have, in the real world, run physics aground. So let's come back to Andreessen's point here: they classified entire branches of physics and took them out of the research community, while real physics went off on a wild goose chase that has yielded precious few demonstrable results in the past half century or so. The effect is that the physics community has been off the scent for so long that anyone old enough to have held the knowledge that was shoved back into Pandora's proverbial box through extreme secrecy measures is now dead. And their taking of that knowledge to the grave may well be a critical part of the secrecy effort. Dead physicists tell no tales. I have this eerie sense that we scared ourselves shitless with certain discoveries (likely knowledge that followed from nuclear physics, which is itself still highly protected and curtailed) and decided that the only way to stop our headlong rush into world-ending catastrophe was to literally bury the knowledge and wait until everyone who had it died off. The government looks, at least to me, to have cauterized a destructive branch in the scientific timeline like they were the Time Variance Authority from Marvel comics. 80 years of claimed zero-progress in reverse-engineering alleged crashed or recovered UAPs. 40+ years of dead-ended physics. Only two or three major AI companies, one of which is now in a fight to the death with the Department of War. And the rumors that AI has "plateaued" or even "dead-ended" in its progress that keep springing up has potential echoes in the AI world of physics being diverted into String Theory. I'm not a mathematician or a physicist. I can't examine all the deeper particulars because I have neither the knowledge or the training. I only have surface level pattern recognition, and that tells me it all feels connected. The problem for the gatekeepers is that you can't bury knowledge that has been discovered once indefinitely. It's certain that all of this will be figured out again. And as Weinstein pointed out about a couple of non-physicists who figured out how to piece together nuclear weapons based on declassified information and publicly available knowledge, it IS happening. But it seems that at least on the individual basis, those green shoots are being pruned. Weinstein asks why none of the people who funded his education are "interested" in his Grand Unifying Theory. Weinstein is too well-known and too well-respected to just be taken out of play. They can't buy him off. They can't make him disappear without drawing more attention. So maybe they just hope that Geometric Unity will die on its own. Maybe they are behind the attacks on GU as something totally unserious. Maybe they have found a way to make other members of the physics community willing to look away. So, my question about this larger hypothetical operation to stop dangerous science and math is this: was it really just a massive kicking of the can down the road. Did they hoped it would buy us time? And if so, to what end? What are they waiting for? Can this game really be played forever? Maybe they think it can. Maybe they have an ongoing directive to keep suppressing this knowledge for as long as possible, and perhaps there's some secret core group whose job is to be the perpetual gatekeepers of potentially civilization-ending secrets. Maybe the Epstein connection to all of this was precisely because he was part of the operation to discover who was doing forbidden work and assess their progress. Maybe that's why, when he met Weinstein, he knew so much about GU. It's impossible to say with any certainty, but as a theory, it does have some real explanatory power. I find myself thinking of the fictional Brothers of the Cruciform Sword in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade -- a small, ancient, secret society whose job it was to keep tabs on people looking for the Holy Grail and stop them, so it doesn't fall into the wrong hands. Are we following the same track here? Could this, as crazy as it sounds, be the missing connective tissue in this mystery?

Steve Skojec

13,976 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Eric Weinstein isn't mincing words: Science has become its own worst enemy, clogged with gatekeepers, whisper networks, and "trolls with PhDs" who crush dissent rather than debate it. He points out the irony—physics once spawned molecular biology, the World Wide Web, and semiconductors—yet now it's sidelined while the institutions meant to protect inquiry instead protect careers. Sabina Hossenfelder gets smeared as "just a popularizer." Bold outsiders get ignored, not even invited for a public takedown. His own example? He claims he can explain the origin of the 16 first-generation particles using general relativity alone—no particle physics needed. The response from the system? Crickets. He says we could break open theoretical physics in five years if we stopped shielding the National Academy, NSF, big journals, and started funding real outsiders—with lawyers, guns, and money if necessary. When curiosity gets replaced by clique protection, what dies next? Your thoughts

Eric Weinstein isn't mincing words: Science has become its own worst enemy, clogged with gatekeepers, whisper networks, and "trolls with PhDs" who crush dissent rather than debate it. He points out the irony—physics once spawned molecular biology, the World Wide Web, and semiconductors—yet now it's sidelined while the institutions meant to protect inquiry instead protect careers. Sabina Hossenfelder gets smeared as "just a popularizer." Bold outsiders get ignored, not even invited for a public takedown. His own example? He claims he can explain the origin of the 16 first-generation particles using general relativity alone—no particle physics needed. The response from the system? Crickets. He says we could break open theoretical physics in five years if we stopped shielding the National Academy, NSF, big journals, and started funding real outsiders—with lawyers, guns, and money if necessary. When curiosity gets replaced by clique protection, what dies next? Your thoughts

Camus

59,097 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

REPORT: Harvey Weinstein just broke his silence in his first public interview in 8 years. Speaking with Candace Owens, the disgraced Hollywood mogul claimed he’s been “wrongfully convicted,” insisting, “Justice has to know the difference between what is immoral and what is illegal.” Weinstein admitted to major personal failures. “I made mistakes. There’s no question about it. I hurt my family. I hurt my friends. I cheated on my wife… a terrible mistake.” But he swore, “I did not commit these crimes. I swear that before God and the people watching now and on my family, I’m wrongfully accused.” Now awaiting retrial, Weinstein said his previous conviction was overturned on appeal. He blasted the media for stacking public opinion against him, stating, “The media doesn’t favor me… but I speak for innocent people.” “I’ve lost everything a man can lose,” he said, “but still, the truth matters.” After years in silence, the man once at the center of the MeToo movement is trying to rewrite the narrative. Will the public buy it? Watch this clip and see what you think.

REPORT: Harvey Weinstein just broke his silence in his first public interview in 8 years. Speaking with Candace Owens, the disgraced Hollywood mogul claimed he’s been “wrongfully convicted,” insisting, “Justice has to know the difference between what is immoral and what is illegal.” Weinstein admitted to major personal failures. “I made mistakes. There’s no question about it. I hurt my family. I hurt my friends. I cheated on my wife… a terrible mistake.” But he swore, “I did not commit these crimes. I swear that before God and the people watching now and on my family, I’m wrongfully accused.” Now awaiting retrial, Weinstein said his previous conviction was overturned on appeal. He blasted the media for stacking public opinion against him, stating, “The media doesn’t favor me… but I speak for innocent people.” “I’ve lost everything a man can lose,” he said, “but still, the truth matters.” After years in silence, the man once at the center of the MeToo movement is trying to rewrite the narrative. Will the public buy it? Watch this clip and see what you think.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

520,424 просмотров • 1 год назад

Americans Are Becoming Wide Awake “America is such a scam. I can't believe that I just ate it up. I just ate up everything they spoon fed me for 35 plus years. Things like - Our government has our best interest - Everything on the market must be safe The more I learn it's such a reckoning in my head right now: - I totally bought all of the history textbook propaganda that the US was the savior, this force of good in the world. Like, no, we're not. No, we're not. We're an imperialist country that has slaughtered tens of thousands of people in their own selfish interests, and we're still doing it. And every politician is bought and paid for, and they've distracted us this whole time with the red versus blue so that we blame someone else instead of them. And I feel like I'm a smart person, and I can't believe that it took me this long to piece it all together. Now that I have, I'm just, like, I'm just horrified.”

Americans Are Becoming Wide Awake “America is such a scam. I can't believe that I just ate it up. I just ate up everything they spoon fed me for 35 plus years. Things like - Our government has our best interest - Everything on the market must be safe The more I learn it's such a reckoning in my head right now: - I totally bought all of the history textbook propaganda that the US was the savior, this force of good in the world. Like, no, we're not. No, we're not. We're an imperialist country that has slaughtered tens of thousands of people in their own selfish interests, and we're still doing it. And every politician is bought and paid for, and they've distracted us this whole time with the red versus blue so that we blame someone else instead of them. And I feel like I'm a smart person, and I can't believe that it took me this long to piece it all together. Now that I have, I'm just, like, I'm just horrified.”

Wall Street Apes

808,627 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Eric Swalwell accusers are going on NATIONAL TV saying his resignation and dropping out of the governor's race won't be enough They say there are KNOWN receipts of what he did. He is screwed. "We're not walking away from this fight." "For me, justice won't be until he can't ever harm a woman ever again." "And he has faced the consequences for the women that he has harmed." "I think in regards to the governor's race, he never should have ran for governor to begin with, knowing the kind of history and receipts that are out there." "So that's a non-starter." "And then in terms of Congress, I think he absolutely should have resigned." "I think we just prevented another 30 to 40 years potentially of him harming people if he were to stay in Congress." "So in that sense, I think we have served justice for his future victims that won't exist anymore."

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Eric Swalwell accusers are going on NATIONAL TV saying his resignation and dropping out of the governor's race won't be enough They say there are KNOWN receipts of what he did. He is screwed. "We're not walking away from this fight." "For me, justice won't be until he can't ever harm a woman ever again." "And he has faced the consequences for the women that he has harmed." "I think in regards to the governor's race, he never should have ran for governor to begin with, knowing the kind of history and receipts that are out there." "So that's a non-starter." "And then in terms of Congress, I think he absolutely should have resigned." "I think we just prevented another 30 to 40 years potentially of him harming people if he were to stay in Congress." "So in that sense, I think we have served justice for his future victims that won't exist anymore."

Eric Daugherty

56,299 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

More from Trump and Qatar gift: "I think this is just a gesture of good-faith." "It'll go to my library... I thought it was a great gesture." He says he would NOT use the plane himself after leaving office. It would basically sit in his library. "I think what happens with the plane is that, you know, we're very disappointed that it's taking Boeing so long to build a new Air Force One. You know, we have an Air Force One that's 40 years old. And if you take a look at that compared to the new plane of the equivalent, you know, stature at the time, it's not even the same ballgame. You look at some of the Arab countries and the planes they have parked alongside of the United States of America plane, it's like from a different planet." "When I came back, I said, by the way, what's going on with the Boeings that are coming in? 'Well, sir, they're way behind.' And they are way behind." "I think Qatar, who has really, we've helped them a lot over the years in terms of security and safety. I think they, and very, very nicely, and I have a lot of respect for the leadership and for the leader, Qatar. And I think they knew about it because they buy Boeings, they buy a lot of Boeings. And they knew about it and they said 'we would like to do something,' and if we can get a 747 as a contribution to our Defense Department to use during a couple of years while they're building the other ones - I think that was a very nice gesture." "Now, I could be a stupid person and say, oh, no, we don't want a free plane. We give free things out. We'll take one, too. And it helps us out because, again, we're talking about we have 40-year-old aircraft. The money we spend, the maintenance we spend on those planes to keep them tippy-top is astronomical."

Open Source Intel

118,783 просмотров • 1 год назад

#ZimElection2023 DAVID COLTART: BORN 66 YEARS AGO IN BULAWAYO, PRACTICED LAW IN BULAWAYO FOR 40 YEARS, STILL CAN’T SPEAK SINDEBELE, CALLS THE CITY OF KINGS & QUEENS ‘BHULUWEYO” YET CHAMISA WANTS TO IMPOSE HIM AS MAYOR David Coltart has been promised Bulawayo’s Mayoral position by the leader of Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), Nelson Chamisa, reports New Zimbabwe.Com: The promise is based on the wish that Chamisa’s CCC will win most of Bulawayo’s 29 council seats and that the elected councillors will obey Chamisa’s orders in the vote for mayor. Although Coltart came a distant number last, after he was heavily defeated in the CCC ‘community caucus’ candidate selection for Ward 4 in Bulawayo, Chamisa imposed him as the winner, ahead of the real winnera, as Harare’s choice for Bulawayo mayor. Chamisa used CCC’s Bulawayo rally two days ago on Sunday to make public his handpicking of Coltart as his Bulawayo mayoral choice. This is raising eyebrows not least because it's the Bulawayo community - not Chamisa or his Harare cohort - which must choose its Mayor through its elected councillors. Besides, why is Chamisa bent on singling out Bulawayo, and imposing a mayor there? Unconcerned that this is irreparrably damaging his claims to be a democrat, and speaking as if he thinks he would be an Executive Mayor, Coltart thundered at the Sunday rally: “I have been a lawyer in this city for 40 years. I want to use my 40 years experience as a lawyer to review all the contracts in Bhuluweyo, to see whether they are in the interests of the citizens of Bhuluweyo, if we find the contracts are not in the interests of Bhuluweyo...,” to Chamisa's amusement. It is outrageous for Coltart to think he can be the mayor of a local community whose language he does not speak, despite having been born there 66 years ago and having worked there as a lawyer for 40 years. The best he can do is to pronounce 'Bulawayo' as 'Bhuluweyo', just like the Rhodies pronounced it 43 years ago. Hayikhona!

#ZimElection2023 DAVID COLTART: BORN 66 YEARS AGO IN BULAWAYO, PRACTICED LAW IN BULAWAYO FOR 40 YEARS, STILL CAN’T SPEAK SINDEBELE, CALLS THE CITY OF KINGS & QUEENS ‘BHULUWEYO” YET CHAMISA WANTS TO IMPOSE HIM AS MAYOR David Coltart has been promised Bulawayo’s Mayoral position by the leader of Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), Nelson Chamisa, reports New Zimbabwe.Com: The promise is based on the wish that Chamisa’s CCC will win most of Bulawayo’s 29 council seats and that the elected councillors will obey Chamisa’s orders in the vote for mayor. Although Coltart came a distant number last, after he was heavily defeated in the CCC ‘community caucus’ candidate selection for Ward 4 in Bulawayo, Chamisa imposed him as the winner, ahead of the real winnera, as Harare’s choice for Bulawayo mayor. Chamisa used CCC’s Bulawayo rally two days ago on Sunday to make public his handpicking of Coltart as his Bulawayo mayoral choice. This is raising eyebrows not least because it's the Bulawayo community - not Chamisa or his Harare cohort - which must choose its Mayor through its elected councillors. Besides, why is Chamisa bent on singling out Bulawayo, and imposing a mayor there? Unconcerned that this is irreparrably damaging his claims to be a democrat, and speaking as if he thinks he would be an Executive Mayor, Coltart thundered at the Sunday rally: “I have been a lawyer in this city for 40 years. I want to use my 40 years experience as a lawyer to review all the contracts in Bhuluweyo, to see whether they are in the interests of the citizens of Bhuluweyo, if we find the contracts are not in the interests of Bhuluweyo...,” to Chamisa's amusement. It is outrageous for Coltart to think he can be the mayor of a local community whose language he does not speak, despite having been born there 66 years ago and having worked there as a lawyer for 40 years. The best he can do is to pronounce 'Bulawayo' as 'Bhuluweyo', just like the Rhodies pronounced it 43 years ago. Hayikhona!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

129,047 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

Anish Acharya: We're going to see a "YouTube moment for software": "If you think about YouTube 20 years ago—we had lots of video and lots of television, and it was high production quality, and it wasn't clear that we needed more and 20 years later, YouTube's a $550 billion enterprise that would be one of the biggest companies in the world if it was independent." "I think the same thing is going to happen for software. People want to make software, and for the first time they can—and they can distribute it and they can consume it." "Sometimes it's going to be important software. Sometimes it's going to be totally trivial. It's going to be software for a bachelor party weekend, software for a joke, software for a prompt. We have this sort of seriousness about software that we had about video and television 20 years ago." "Now it's like—I just took a video on my phone. It's going to be like—I just made an app on my phone. Same energy." Anish Acharya on BILLIONS with Guillaume Moubeche

a16z

102,781 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Cameron Young is playing with a golf ball that would allegedly be compliant with the new roll back rules that will come into effect in a few years time. He was asked about it ahead of the PGA Championship and he says every player in the game is sacrificing distance for control, and he put it in play at the Wyndham last year which he won. “I think I put it in play the same reason that everybody else plays the ball that they play. I hit it during a ball test, one of the Titleist facilities probably close to two years ago and didn't know anything about it and just kind of say, hey, what's that one? Because I liked the flight. “Then as things progressed, I was able to test it last year at Wyndham, able to put that in play, and it's been there since. “Obviously there is no conforming list. I wasn't aware that it would have -- I suppose I read something that said it passed that test, but I wasn't aware of that until very recently. “So at no point was that a consideration. It was just really me trying to optimize my golf, and it's the ball that seems to work the best for me.” He then was asked whether he lost distance with it compared to other balls he’s tested: “Not particularly. I don't think any of us are out really here playing the ball that goes the farthest. I think you'd struggle to find a single person that's doing that. We're all sacrificing a certain amount of things that we feel are worth it, control with irons, control with wedges. For me, that's the biggest thing is being able to control spin, and this is the ball that does the best for me.” Finally he can as asked whether this ball goes further than the one he was using: “No, I hit very similar, yeah. It's much more -- the driver is kind of the easiest thing to deal with, I feel like. For me to get it where it needed to be, I had to just add a little bit of spin, and it kind of comes out at a perfectly playable range. “For me, the biggest thing, like I said, is the irons. This ball is easier to control with the irons. It doesn't spin as much, and it just allows me to be better with my distance control just because it's more consistent.” The golf ball rollback has been a hugely controversial subject but Cameron Young is currently using one that’s compliant and he is playing the best golf of his career. This gives the best idea yet on what impact, or lack of it, the new rules will actually have on the sport. PGA Championship

Cameron Young is playing with a golf ball that would allegedly be compliant with the new roll back rules that will come into effect in a few years time. He was asked about it ahead of the PGA Championship and he says every player in the game is sacrificing distance for control, and he put it in play at the Wyndham last year which he won. “I think I put it in play the same reason that everybody else plays the ball that they play. I hit it during a ball test, one of the Titleist facilities probably close to two years ago and didn't know anything about it and just kind of say, hey, what's that one? Because I liked the flight. “Then as things progressed, I was able to test it last year at Wyndham, able to put that in play, and it's been there since. “Obviously there is no conforming list. I wasn't aware that it would have -- I suppose I read something that said it passed that test, but I wasn't aware of that until very recently. “So at no point was that a consideration. It was just really me trying to optimize my golf, and it's the ball that seems to work the best for me.” He then was asked whether he lost distance with it compared to other balls he’s tested: “Not particularly. I don't think any of us are out really here playing the ball that goes the farthest. I think you'd struggle to find a single person that's doing that. We're all sacrificing a certain amount of things that we feel are worth it, control with irons, control with wedges. For me, that's the biggest thing is being able to control spin, and this is the ball that does the best for me.” Finally he can as asked whether this ball goes further than the one he was using: “No, I hit very similar, yeah. It's much more -- the driver is kind of the easiest thing to deal with, I feel like. For me to get it where it needed to be, I had to just add a little bit of spin, and it kind of comes out at a perfectly playable range. “For me, the biggest thing, like I said, is the irons. This ball is easier to control with the irons. It doesn't spin as much, and it just allows me to be better with my distance control just because it's more consistent.” The golf ball rollback has been a hugely controversial subject but Cameron Young is currently using one that’s compliant and he is playing the best golf of his career. This gives the best idea yet on what impact, or lack of it, the new rules will actually have on the sport. PGA Championship

Flushing It

311,493 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Matt Damon reveals he and Ben Affleck met when they were 10 and 8 years old, and how they're still working together 40 years later Amy Poehler: "What, you met, what, 10 and 8 or something?" Matt Damon: "10 and 8... At 16 and 14 years old, we were going to New York together to audition for stuff..." "And here we are 40 years later, and it's like, we should make every single movie we can together." "It's not a friendship that could ever be replicated, just because we grew up together, which meant we were together all the time." "One of the great things about writing with him was always the fact that there was a deep and abiding love and respect underneath everything that was never in question." "It's very helpful when you're working creatively with someone because you're not worried about their feelings." "For me, it's like this, my closest friend for 40 years, 45 years. Who else would I want to hang out with and do this stuff?"

Matt Damon reveals he and Ben Affleck met when they were 10 and 8 years old, and how they're still working together 40 years later Amy Poehler: "What, you met, what, 10 and 8 or something?" Matt Damon: "10 and 8... At 16 and 14 years old, we were going to New York together to audition for stuff..." "And here we are 40 years later, and it's like, we should make every single movie we can together." "It's not a friendship that could ever be replicated, just because we grew up together, which meant we were together all the time." "One of the great things about writing with him was always the fact that there was a deep and abiding love and respect underneath everything that was never in question." "It's very helpful when you're working creatively with someone because you're not worried about their feelings." "For me, it's like this, my closest friend for 40 years, 45 years. Who else would I want to hang out with and do this stuff?"

Bavi

165,653 просмотров • 11 дней назад

On Joe Rogan's podcast, Bret Weinstein discussed in length why Robert Kennedy Jr. is the best candidate for president in 2024. "The folks who have been loyal Democrats... need to wake up. That party has been captured by something that is not interested in the well-being of the country," Weinstein said. "Personally, I think RFK Jr. is the solution to this problem." Upon Rogan asking him if there's a path for Kennedy to win, Weinstein said, "Yep, there are multiple pathways... I think we all need to start thinking diferently." Weinstein said that the "capture of our system is such a profound threat" and that we need to come together and get behind whatever it takes to get the people who are a part of that out. "As far as I'm concerned, the best shot we got is Bobby Kennedy... he's literally willing to die to take a shot at saving the country, and I think we need to get behind that." Rogan then added, "If anybody has real thought that they might be killed, it's a guy whose father and uncle were killed because of doing the exact same thing." Weinstein agreed, saying Kennedy's "origin story makes this like Odessius returning to the manor, stringing the bow. This is the iconic moment." He also explained that he believes Kennedy is better positioned than Trump to solve this because Kennedy is "a brilliant thinker and he is encyclopedic in his knowledge." He also emphasized that Kennedy could have eight years to solve the problem, while Trump would only have four. Weinstein concluded, saying, "Trump has the temperament to win the office, but he doesn't have the temperament to address the nuances of the problems. He got played during Covid, and he still doesn't see it, right? That's a problem. That has to do with him being ego-driven."

On Joe Rogan's podcast, Bret Weinstein discussed in length why Robert Kennedy Jr. is the best candidate for president in 2024. "The folks who have been loyal Democrats... need to wake up. That party has been captured by something that is not interested in the well-being of the country," Weinstein said. "Personally, I think RFK Jr. is the solution to this problem." Upon Rogan asking him if there's a path for Kennedy to win, Weinstein said, "Yep, there are multiple pathways... I think we all need to start thinking diferently." Weinstein said that the "capture of our system is such a profound threat" and that we need to come together and get behind whatever it takes to get the people who are a part of that out. "As far as I'm concerned, the best shot we got is Bobby Kennedy... he's literally willing to die to take a shot at saving the country, and I think we need to get behind that." Rogan then added, "If anybody has real thought that they might be killed, it's a guy whose father and uncle were killed because of doing the exact same thing." Weinstein agreed, saying Kennedy's "origin story makes this like Odessius returning to the manor, stringing the bow. This is the iconic moment." He also explained that he believes Kennedy is better positioned than Trump to solve this because Kennedy is "a brilliant thinker and he is encyclopedic in his knowledge." He also emphasized that Kennedy could have eight years to solve the problem, while Trump would only have four. Weinstein concluded, saying, "Trump has the temperament to win the office, but he doesn't have the temperament to address the nuances of the problems. He got played during Covid, and he still doesn't see it, right? That's a problem. That has to do with him being ego-driven."

Christian Movick

1,397,647 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Stephen A. Smith says Kawhi Leonard is responsible for OKC starting backcourt of SGA and Jalen Willams: “Who dropped a 40 piece in the finals, okay. And what the clippers have to show for it especially last five years is two playoff exits they didn’t make it and 3 trips home In the first round. Over the last five years they haven’t made it out the first round, they made the playoffs twice and they’ve been bounced in the first round. Somebody came to you, and they said to you this brotha who blackmailed you into getting Paul George to come here knowing that we want to build a new arena, knowing they couldn’t let him go to the Lakers and they blackmailed you into getting the boy Paul George to come join the team and we gave up all of them assets and now years later this is what we have to show for it. This man only won 3 playoff series, he’s got just as many contract extensions from the Clippers as he has playoff series wins. Haven’t been to no conference finals, haven’t done nothing. But put up some numbers when healthy, missed 40% of his regular season games, missed 30% of his playoffs games and that brotha came to you and ask for a contract extension?” (Via First Take)

Stephen A. Smith says Kawhi Leonard is responsible for OKC starting backcourt of SGA and Jalen Willams: “Who dropped a 40 piece in the finals, okay. And what the clippers have to show for it especially last five years is two playoff exits they didn’t make it and 3 trips home In the first round. Over the last five years they haven’t made it out the first round, they made the playoffs twice and they’ve been bounced in the first round. Somebody came to you, and they said to you this brotha who blackmailed you into getting Paul George to come here knowing that we want to build a new arena, knowing they couldn’t let him go to the Lakers and they blackmailed you into getting the boy Paul George to come join the team and we gave up all of them assets and now years later this is what we have to show for it. This man only won 3 playoff series, he’s got just as many contract extensions from the Clippers as he has playoff series wins. Haven’t been to no conference finals, haven’t done nothing. But put up some numbers when healthy, missed 40% of his regular season games, missed 30% of his playoffs games and that brotha came to you and ask for a contract extension?” (Via First Take)

NBA Courtside

70,796 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Good morning, There are times when you have to seat down and have a meeting with yourself! Be honest and ask yourself the tough questions? Yes my parents didn’t leave me a lot but they made me as literate as they could. Yes the economy is tough but have l really given it my all in trying to forge a path for myself or the next generation or l have chosen to accept what is being offered to me. Some decisions you have to question them yourself,l go around with an iPhone 17 promax but l saved for 4 months to buy the gadget,is this the best use of your 4 months savings ? You can afford to have a small stand but instead l believe in Yolo,you only live once so l rent a $1000 dollar apartment instead of $400 dollar,yet at 40 years the same person will be blaming the economy for not owning a home. I have a friend who is either at Evitro,Smokehouse and he posts receipts every Monday,$900 or $1200 and they will be 4 of them every weekend. So l do the quick maths,that’s $200 per weekend for beer plus probably another $100-$150 for the girls they will be with, It’s simple maths that is about a $1000 USD per month of You only Live once,then add the rentals and fuels e.t.c per month that’s around $1500 to $2000,yet he doesn’t mind because he believes he will even make it bigger and better. The honest question is what guarantee does he have that tomorrow he will have this capacity to make $2000 a month or more like he is doing now! I am one of those people who is so obsessed with traveling and running ,sat down with myself and noticed that last year l went to SA 5 times to just run and at a minimum if l go with family that is 2 k per trip,so roughly that is 10 k spent on just running,one day my kids will ask dad what did you do with your life and l will give them stupid medals if l don’t mange myself! All I am saying is we all have the beautiful things we love in this life and the real question is when are we going to stop and build for the next generation !

Good morning, There are times when you have to seat down and have a meeting with yourself! Be honest and ask yourself the tough questions? Yes my parents didn’t leave me a lot but they made me as literate as they could. Yes the economy is tough but have l really given it my all in trying to forge a path for myself or the next generation or l have chosen to accept what is being offered to me. Some decisions you have to question them yourself,l go around with an iPhone 17 promax but l saved for 4 months to buy the gadget,is this the best use of your 4 months savings ? You can afford to have a small stand but instead l believe in Yolo,you only live once so l rent a $1000 dollar apartment instead of $400 dollar,yet at 40 years the same person will be blaming the economy for not owning a home. I have a friend who is either at Evitro,Smokehouse and he posts receipts every Monday,$900 or $1200 and they will be 4 of them every weekend. So l do the quick maths,that’s $200 per weekend for beer plus probably another $100-$150 for the girls they will be with, It’s simple maths that is about a $1000 USD per month of You only Live once,then add the rentals and fuels e.t.c per month that’s around $1500 to $2000,yet he doesn’t mind because he believes he will even make it bigger and better. The honest question is what guarantee does he have that tomorrow he will have this capacity to make $2000 a month or more like he is doing now! I am one of those people who is so obsessed with traveling and running ,sat down with myself and noticed that last year l went to SA 5 times to just run and at a minimum if l go with family that is 2 k per trip,so roughly that is 10 k spent on just running,one day my kids will ask dad what did you do with your life and l will give them stupid medals if l don’t mange myself! All I am saying is we all have the beautiful things we love in this life and the real question is when are we going to stop and build for the next generation !

Uncle Tony

14,770 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This is @doctorgadsaad on Real Talk with Marissa Streit One of the most compelling minds of our generation. Watch this. Gad Saad has spent his career studying what he calls idea pathogens. The ideological viruses that infect otherwise intelligent people and systematically destroy their capacity for reason. His hypothesis on why the progressive movement is so singularly focused on dismantling Western civilisation is not a political argument. It is a biological and psychological one. And it is devastatingly coherent. We look around us and we ask ourselves the same question repeatedly. How can educated people, people with university degrees and professional careers and real intelligence, genuinely believe that the most successful, most free, most prosperous civilisational model in human history is the primary source of suffering in the world. How do you arrive at that conclusion. What pathology produces it. Gad Saad has an answer. I have been watching his work for years. He is one of a small number of public intellectuals with the courage to say plainly what most of us have been thinking. The fact that he happens to be Jewish and Lebanese-born gives his perspective a dimension that the tenured ideologues screaming colonialism from their air-conditioned offices could not comprehend on their best day. Watch the full clip. Then ask yourself how we got here and what we intend to do about it.

This is @doctorgadsaad on Real Talk with Marissa Streit One of the most compelling minds of our generation. Watch this. Gad Saad has spent his career studying what he calls idea pathogens. The ideological viruses that infect otherwise intelligent people and systematically destroy their capacity for reason. His hypothesis on why the progressive movement is so singularly focused on dismantling Western civilisation is not a political argument. It is a biological and psychological one. And it is devastatingly coherent. We look around us and we ask ourselves the same question repeatedly. How can educated people, people with university degrees and professional careers and real intelligence, genuinely believe that the most successful, most free, most prosperous civilisational model in human history is the primary source of suffering in the world. How do you arrive at that conclusion. What pathology produces it. Gad Saad has an answer. I have been watching his work for years. He is one of a small number of public intellectuals with the courage to say plainly what most of us have been thinking. The fact that he happens to be Jewish and Lebanese-born gives his perspective a dimension that the tenured ideologues screaming colonialism from their air-conditioned offices could not comprehend on their best day. Watch the full clip. Then ask yourself how we got here and what we intend to do about it.

Hylton with a Y 🇮🇱

151,256 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

How many other Republicans think the same was as Ben Shapiro does on social security and medicare? "No one in the United States should be retiring at 65 years old. Retirement itself is a stupid idea unless you have some sort of health problem." My father retired at 57. He's 77 right now. He doesn't miss work at all nor did he 'lose purpose'. I'm pretty sure the majority of people about to retire or who have recently retired will tell you the same. FACTS: - Nearly 95% of people over 60 have at least one chronic condition, and nearly 80% have two or more. - Most people don't thoroughly love their job. - Most people get more enjoyment out of retiring and then finding things they love to do, sometimes for less money, or sometimes for no money at all. Ben Shapiro is out of touch because he is 40 years old, in good health, and likely enjoys what he does for a living as well the $50M he has made doing it.

How many other Republicans think the same was as Ben Shapiro does on social security and medicare? "No one in the United States should be retiring at 65 years old. Retirement itself is a stupid idea unless you have some sort of health problem." My father retired at 57. He's 77 right now. He doesn't miss work at all nor did he 'lose purpose'. I'm pretty sure the majority of people about to retire or who have recently retired will tell you the same. FACTS: - Nearly 95% of people over 60 have at least one chronic condition, and nearly 80% have two or more. - Most people don't thoroughly love their job. - Most people get more enjoyment out of retiring and then finding things they love to do, sometimes for less money, or sometimes for no money at all. Ben Shapiro is out of touch because he is 40 years old, in good health, and likely enjoys what he does for a living as well the $50M he has made doing it.

Brian Krassenstein

2,276,194 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.

"I want to describe to you the life of a non-vaccinated person in Israel today. Our life has been destroyed, and we woke up to a nightmare in which we have have been kidnapped by our own government, who sold us to be guinea pigs to an experimental vaccine. They want us to give up our bodies and our souls with no questions. We have become the biggest clinical trial of a vaccine in history in the scale of an entire country" Listen to this testimony from an Israeli citizen on what life was like for an unvaccinated person in Israel at the beginning of the insane vaccination campaign and mass experiment on the Israeli people. What's the difference between Israel experimenting on millions of their own citizens and killing thousands of them with forceful coercion techniques, and them bombing a hospital in Gaza killing 500? or letting Hamas kill their people as justification for the war and perpetuation of more death. If we just go by the numbers, shouldn't we all be far more outraged about the vaccine? That death toll is easily over a million globally now, perhaps even tens of millions. Why should I trust the government that did this to their own people? Why should I listen to any government that did this to their people? It's willful murder no matter how you spin it, and we should all know by now that the denial of such evils by all the authorities that people are still clinging to for the truth, or the ignorance/negligence excuse that they didn't know, is a complete and utter BS lie. They had a clear purpose with the vaccines and knew exactly what they were doing, just as they have a clear purpose now with war and propaganda that comes with it. Depopulation.

Inversionism

642,228 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Keith Keith Rabois Breaks Down Trump's Political Super Powers: Keith on E207: "So the most interesting question to me, over the last year was: how is (Trump), who everybody in the media and everybody in the legal groups of various things is trying to attack and hate, why is he on the precipice of being elected President of United States twice?" "(Trump) must have a super power or two." "So what it came down to, and I interviewed a lot of people who were critics of him but knew him well, like ex-cabinet people that don't like him." "It comes down to he just asks a lot of 'why?'" 1) Asking "Why?" Keith: "Trump asks a lot of "why?": 'Why do we have to do it this way? Why have we done it this way?'" And it turns out in politics and in DC, most of the answers are pretty mediocre, or weak, or poor, or haven't been rethought for 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 years." "And so (Trump) just constantly dives in and says, 'why, why, why, why?'" "And that's actually what predicts success for founders, is in a domain they don't know anything about, they're just like, 'why?'" In Airbnb's case, the founders asked, "Why should we take hotels for granted? Why should they be so expensive?" 2) Getting Feedback from a Diverse Group of Thinkers Keith: "(Trump) doesn't just take one source of input. And so you can never totally predict the output." "But he arrays an interesting cast of characters and listens to them." "Like for example, I haven't spent that much time with him, but in so far as I have, he would go around the room and ask every single person at dinner, 'What's your view on 'X'?' And literally go around a room of 28 people and listen to every single person." "So I think that's how he makes decisions."

Keith Keith Rabois Breaks Down Trump's Political Super Powers: Keith on E207: "So the most interesting question to me, over the last year was: how is (Trump), who everybody in the media and everybody in the legal groups of various things is trying to attack and hate, why is he on the precipice of being elected President of United States twice?" "(Trump) must have a super power or two." "So what it came down to, and I interviewed a lot of people who were critics of him but knew him well, like ex-cabinet people that don't like him." "It comes down to he just asks a lot of 'why?'" 1) Asking "Why?" Keith: "Trump asks a lot of "why?": 'Why do we have to do it this way? Why have we done it this way?'" And it turns out in politics and in DC, most of the answers are pretty mediocre, or weak, or poor, or haven't been rethought for 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 years." "And so (Trump) just constantly dives in and says, 'why, why, why, why?'" "And that's actually what predicts success for founders, is in a domain they don't know anything about, they're just like, 'why?'" In Airbnb's case, the founders asked, "Why should we take hotels for granted? Why should they be so expensive?" 2) Getting Feedback from a Diverse Group of Thinkers Keith: "(Trump) doesn't just take one source of input. And so you can never totally predict the output." "But he arrays an interesting cast of characters and listens to them." "Like for example, I haven't spent that much time with him, but in so far as I have, he would go around the room and ask every single person at dinner, 'What's your view on 'X'?' And literally go around a room of 28 people and listen to every single person." "So I think that's how he makes decisions."

The All-In Podcast

44,169 просмотров • 1 год назад

Eric Schmidt on what he calls "the San Francisco consensus": "There's a group of people that I work with. They're all in San Francisco and they've all basically convinced themselves that in the next two to four year, the average is three years the entire world will change." He's careful to flag the catch in that word "consensus": "It's true that it's a consensus, but it's not necessarily true that the consensus is true." So why do these people believe it? Eric walks through the reasoning. First came language-to-language models. "ChatGPT is the best one, they did a great job," he says, with everyone else catching up. Then came two additions: reasoning, and memory inside these systems. Put those together and you get what he calls the agentic revolution: "The agentic revolution… can be understood as language in, memory and language, language out." To make it concrete, he uses a deliberately mundane example. Say he wants to build a house in California. One agent finds the lot. Another works out the rules. Another designs the building. Another selects the contractor. And, at least in America, another agent sues the contractor when the house doesn't work. The point of such a "stupid example," as he puts it, is exactly that it's ordinary: "I just gave you a workflow example that's true of every business, every government and every group human activity." That's why he thinks the consensus carries weight: "When you understand that the agentic revolution and the reasoning revolution together really changed the way we operate as humans, then you understand why the San Francisco consensus is so powerful." On the reasoning side, he points to models that work a problem forward and backward: "It will blow your mind away, especially when you ask it a question that you have no idea what the question is about and you watch it reason." And he cites the numbers he's seeing: "Google now has a math model that is at the 90 percentile of math graduate students." More broadly, he claims, "we now have systems now that are 90% of all of the graduate school skills. You know, math, physics, and so forth." When something can do that, he argues, "it will happen at a big scale." This is where the consensus reaches its sharpest point: recursive self-improvement. "There's a moment when what is called recursive self-improvement, the system begins to learn on itself, where it goes forward at a rate that is impossible for us to understand. It becomes combinatorial in a way that we as humans do not understand." His verdict on all of it is two-sided: "This is both incredibly exciting and also very worrisome."

Eric Schmidt on what he calls "the San Francisco consensus": "There's a group of people that I work with. They're all in San Francisco and they've all basically convinced themselves that in the next two to four year, the average is three years the entire world will change." He's careful to flag the catch in that word "consensus": "It's true that it's a consensus, but it's not necessarily true that the consensus is true." So why do these people believe it? Eric walks through the reasoning. First came language-to-language models. "ChatGPT is the best one, they did a great job," he says, with everyone else catching up. Then came two additions: reasoning, and memory inside these systems. Put those together and you get what he calls the agentic revolution: "The agentic revolution… can be understood as language in, memory and language, language out." To make it concrete, he uses a deliberately mundane example. Say he wants to build a house in California. One agent finds the lot. Another works out the rules. Another designs the building. Another selects the contractor. And, at least in America, another agent sues the contractor when the house doesn't work. The point of such a "stupid example," as he puts it, is exactly that it's ordinary: "I just gave you a workflow example that's true of every business, every government and every group human activity." That's why he thinks the consensus carries weight: "When you understand that the agentic revolution and the reasoning revolution together really changed the way we operate as humans, then you understand why the San Francisco consensus is so powerful." On the reasoning side, he points to models that work a problem forward and backward: "It will blow your mind away, especially when you ask it a question that you have no idea what the question is about and you watch it reason." And he cites the numbers he's seeing: "Google now has a math model that is at the 90 percentile of math graduate students." More broadly, he claims, "we now have systems now that are 90% of all of the graduate school skills. You know, math, physics, and so forth." When something can do that, he argues, "it will happen at a big scale." This is where the consensus reaches its sharpest point: recursive self-improvement. "There's a moment when what is called recursive self-improvement, the system begins to learn on itself, where it goes forward at a rate that is impossible for us to understand. It becomes combinatorial in a way that we as humans do not understand." His verdict on all of it is two-sided: "This is both incredibly exciting and also very worrisome."

High Signal AI

31,085 просмотров • 1 месяц назад