Eric Weinstein: “None of you worry about microscopic UFOs where the surface area is not predictive of the volume encased.” 🛸 If something can do spacetime engineering, he asks, why would its profile be city sized? It would not have to be. His claim is that we keep trying... to engineer Einstein’s spacetime when the real move is the successor to it. Kids already expect pinch to zoom on every surface. He says three spatial pinch to zooms are built in, like an Easter egg. “I’m not going to Alpha Centauri by going real fast. I’m going to grow a ruler. Growing a ruler in that direction shrinks the distance. Then I walk two feet. Then I shrink the ruler and grow the distance back.” Alongside that: one temporal pinch to dilate, three shear to tilt, plus shear to boost. New forces and particles with addresses. Dark chemistry, in his words. The observed anomalies look less like nuts and bolts airframes and more like access to a geometry we have not learned to touch yet. If surface area no longer predicts volume, what exactly are we looking at?show more

Credit

It will be information waiting and transmitted through the lattice, where is is or will be stored. Everything that is ever happened is encoded in now. Moving forward is based on ontological predicate.

Why can’t aliens be the size of a plant or animal cell?

Whats the presentation this clip is from!?

Weinstein has never taught at a college. And his work is recognized by basically no one and isn’t used on anything. But he is a Israeli/Thiel cultural placement asset. Just like fake academic lex Friedman. These people are presented to use to push narratives.

I'm open to his approach, I just need to spend more time trying to understand it. I watched one of his lectures some years ago on how one might approach unifying quantum physics and GR... but there wasn't much of anything on his Geometric Unity theory back then. The only reference I have for feasibility is the close encounter I had during COVID. It sure as hell looked like a ER/EPR Wormhole and Metric drive to my feeble mind.

Weinstein’s idea is highly speculative, not established physics, but it points toward a fascinating possibility: maybe we’re trying to understand an unfamiliar geometry using the wrong measurements.

Dimensions are not things. We describe movement with the idea of dimensions. It is a self-conscious separation of stuff into continuums. Since Descartes we have this idea that the universe acts along ‘dimensions’. This is the Human mind imposing upon the universe. It’s handy and it works well but we need to remember that these ‘dimensions’ we use are not real things. And that talk about moving along them independently of the others is gobbledegook.

wormholes are sub atomic , that's why we can be visited & why we can't follow it/they back to the source that's outside of our Spacetime

Sophons

They’re not tiny… The volume isn’t in this geometry, Surface area is the only thing they let you measure 😳

Michio once said to travel into the past is to invert matter to a negative state to counteract the matter you would travel against. If you needed to travel from a star to star without having everyone die by your return travel, it travel into the past simultaneously to the star

He committed more in that talk than I’ve seen him do in the past 10 years.

Erics idea sounds off the hook but it is going to take a system of travel that is not based on speed alone. I suggest we work on a different path other than light speed, like shrinking and expanding .

Caben en una gota de lluvia. A ver quién se atreve ahora a tragar agua a oscuras.

He was against this before he was for it

Now that's creative thinking!

Okay, the ruler analogy finally made this click. Don't build a faster car. Shrink the road. Travel across it. Grow the road back behind you. That doesn't mean we know how to engineer spacetime, much less that UAPs are doing it. But it completely changes the propulsion question. Maybe asking how something accelerates from A to B is already assuming the technology has to play by our definition of the distance between A and B. Now my brain hurts pleasantly.

You might need to be in quantum size to access the KK fifth dimension

Yeah thats what they did in the 3 body problem

Da más miedo lo que entra en los pulmones sin hacer ruido. ¿Qué notasteis justo después?

He just described portals.

like folding space like origami - to connect 2 points, then release the fold.

actually i think about interspace @ericweinstein all the time are there schools of extra dimensionals within us&microscopically learning human anatomy are there microscopic vessels that are the older universes and as the universe cycles it expands as their interior vacuums shrink

You guys are talking about stuff you have no idea about, it’s like hearing a 3 yr old speak about trigonometry. We can do this thing, and we can then do that other thing, and then we can just do this. Yaaaa, totally 👍

Skippy!!!

This is getting tiresome.

Some people have already found the bridge. Remote viewers access a form of collective consciousness in a hyperspace. A dimension where information travels faster than light. Time is not fixed there.