Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🤖 Ever wished robots could learn new manipulation tasks with just a few demos — and still generalize? 🔥 Introducing ControlVLA: Few-shot Object-centric Adaptation for Pre-trained Vision-Language-Action Models. 🦾🎯 From opening cabinets to folding clothes, pouring cubes, organizing toys — even long-horizon tasks! 💡 Adapts object-centric cues via ControlNet-style... show more

Siyuan Huang

5,248 subscribers

19,747 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Kommentare

Profilbild von Raul Verdusco

Raul Verduscovor 1 Jahr

💡Impressive leap in robot learning! ControlVLA shows how far few-shot adaptation has come — enabling robots to handle complex, long-horizon tasks with minimal demos. 🚀🔧 This could be a game-changer for real-world deployment. #Automation #Robotics #AI #FewShotLearning 🤖✨

Ähnliche Videos

🚀🚀🚀 Ever wondered what it takes for robots to handle real-world household tasks? long-horizon execution, deformable object dexterity, and unseen object generalization — meet GR-3, ByteDance Seed’s new Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model! GR-3 is a generalizable Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model with strong capabilities in complex long-horizon tasks. It understands unseen abstract concepts, manipulates deformable objects robustly, and adapts to novel settings with minimal human data. ✨ Generalization: Generalizes well to unseen objects, environments, and even instructions with abstract concepts. ✨ Long-Horizon Manipulation: Completes long-horizon tasks with strong instruction-following capabilities. ✨ Deformable Object Manipulation: Manipulate deformable objects robustly. Project Page: Arxiv: #ByteDance #ByteDanceSeed #GR3 #VLA #Robotics #FoundationModels

🚀🚀🚀 Ever wondered what it takes for robots to handle real-world household tasks? long-horizon execution, deformable object dexterity, and unseen object generalization — meet GR-3, ByteDance Seed’s new Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model! GR-3 is a generalizable Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model with strong capabilities in complex long-horizon tasks. It understands unseen abstract concepts, manipulates deformable objects robustly, and adapts to novel settings with minimal human data. ✨ Generalization: Generalizes well to unseen objects, environments, and even instructions with abstract concepts. ✨ Long-Horizon Manipulation: Completes long-horizon tasks with strong instruction-following capabilities. ✨ Deformable Object Manipulation: Manipulate deformable objects robustly. Project Page: Arxiv: #ByteDance #ByteDanceSeed #GR3 #VLA #Robotics #FoundationModels

Xiao Ma

46,426 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What if robots could improve themselves by learning from their own failures in the real-world? Introducing 𝗣𝗟𝗗 (𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗲, 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻, 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹) — a recipe that enables Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models to self-improve for high-precision manipulation tasks. PLD couples real-world residual reinforcement learning with standard supervised fine-tuning — letting robots discover, recover, and distill their own data flywheel. Quick 🧵

What if robots could improve themselves by learning from their own failures in the real-world? Introducing 𝗣𝗟𝗗 (𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗲, 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻, 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹) — a recipe that enables Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models to self-improve for high-precision manipulation tasks. PLD couples real-world residual reinforcement learning with standard supervised fine-tuning — letting robots discover, recover, and distill their own data flywheel. Quick 🧵

Wenli Xiao

186,079 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Excited to introduce SOLE-R1, a video-language reasoning model for zero-shot reward prediction for robot manipulation tasks! SOLE-R1 reasoning can serve as the SOLE signal for learning new tasks (completely from scratch) through online RL - i.e., robots start with random actions and learn previously unseen tasks guided only by SOLE-R1 rewards, without any demonstrations, ground-truth rewards, success indicators, or task-specific tuning. SOLE-R1 significantly outperforms strong baselines (e.g., Robometer, RoboReward, TOPReward, GPT-5, Gemini-3-Pro) in zero-shot online RL when evaluated across 40 tasks - including a real-world tabletop manipulation setting and 4 sim environments (LIBERO, ManiSkill, Meta-World, RoboSuite). We open source all models, training data, and code. Website, demos, and paper at: 🧵 (1/6)

Excited to introduce SOLE-R1, a video-language reasoning model for zero-shot reward prediction for robot manipulation tasks! SOLE-R1 reasoning can serve as the SOLE signal for learning new tasks (completely from scratch) through online RL - i.e., robots start with random actions and learn previously unseen tasks guided only by SOLE-R1 rewards, without any demonstrations, ground-truth rewards, success indicators, or task-specific tuning. SOLE-R1 significantly outperforms strong baselines (e.g., Robometer, RoboReward, TOPReward, GPT-5, Gemini-3-Pro) in zero-shot online RL when evaluated across 40 tasks - including a real-world tabletop manipulation setting and 4 sim environments (LIBERO, ManiSkill, Meta-World, RoboSuite). We open source all models, training data, and code. Website, demos, and paper at: 🧵 (1/6)

Philip Schroeder

19,755 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🦾 From seeing to doing. We're closing the loop between video prediction and real-world action. On the final day of Robbyant Open Source Week, we bring you LingBot-VA—the world's first causal video-action world model for generalist robot control. 🔥 Key Highlights: 🤖 Predicts & Acts: A single model generates both future video and the actions to make it real. 🧠 Remembers the Past: True long-term memory for complex, sequential tasks. ⚡ Learns in a Snap: Masters new skills with just 30-50 real-world demos. The result? 📈 SOTA on RoboTwin (92.9%) and LIBERO (98.5%), +20% over π0.5 on challenging real-world long-horizon & high-precision tasks. More below 👇 #AI #Robotics #EmbodiedAI #WorldModel #OpenSource

🦾 From seeing to doing. We're closing the loop between video prediction and real-world action. On the final day of Robbyant Open Source Week, we bring you LingBot-VA—the world's first causal video-action world model for generalist robot control. 🔥 Key Highlights: 🤖 Predicts & Acts: A single model generates both future video and the actions to make it real. 🧠 Remembers the Past: True long-term memory for complex, sequential tasks. ⚡ Learns in a Snap: Masters new skills with just 30-50 real-world demos. The result? 📈 SOTA on RoboTwin (92.9%) and LIBERO (98.5%), +20% over π0.5 on challenging real-world long-horizon & high-precision tasks. More below 👇 #AI #Robotics #EmbodiedAI #WorldModel #OpenSource

Robbyant

704,157 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🔥 #ICRA2026 Best Paper Finalist The era of "robot VLA = single-arm gripper" is ending. Introducing Dexora — the first open-source Vision-Language-Action system for dual-arm, dual-hand, 36-DoF dexterous manipulation. 🦾 Dual Arms 🖐️ Dual Hands 🎯 36 DoF Control 🌍 Open Source Trained on: • 100K simulated trajectories • 10K real-world demonstrations Dexora achieves: ✓ 90%+ success on basic manipulation ✓ Strong dexterous manipulation performance ✓ Cross-embodiment generalization Our key hypothesis: Train on the hardest embodiment. Transfer to simpler robots later. Instead of scaling up gripper policies, we train directly in the most expressive action space and project downward to simpler embodiments. This may be a practical path toward universal robot controllers. 🎥 Demos: 📄 Paper:

🔥 #ICRA2026 Best Paper Finalist The era of "robot VLA = single-arm gripper" is ending. Introducing Dexora — the first open-source Vision-Language-Action system for dual-arm, dual-hand, 36-DoF dexterous manipulation. 🦾 Dual Arms 🖐️ Dual Hands 🎯 36 DoF Control 🌍 Open Source Trained on: • 100K simulated trajectories • 10K real-world demonstrations Dexora achieves: ✓ 90%+ success on basic manipulation ✓ Strong dexterous manipulation performance ✓ Cross-embodiment generalization Our key hypothesis: Train on the hardest embodiment. Transfer to simpler robots later. Instead of scaling up gripper policies, we train directly in the most expressive action space and project downward to simpler embodiments. This may be a practical path toward universal robot controllers. 🎥 Demos: 📄 Paper:

Hao Zhao

17,474 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Show it a single human demonstration of a long-horizon task and the robot performs it right away. No fine-tuning, no retraining. Skild has released S1, a robot foundation model where you specify the task with a video demonstration instead of a language instruction. Why video, not language Language works for "hand me the mug." It falls apart for anything delicate or long-horizon. You don't learn to fold a fitted sheet from a sentence. So S1 takes a video demo into its context window and translates it to its own body and scene. What it does - Tasks up to 10 minutes, dozens of sequential steps - Unseen tasks: potting plants, pour-over coffee, kit assembly, pancakes. Skild says even the underlying primitives, like flipping a pancake, weren't in pre-training - Recovers from its own mistakes without being trained to - Improves on flawed demos. Demonstrator drops an egg, S1 doesn't make that mistake. It reads the demo as a goal, not a trajectory to copy.

Show it a single human demonstration of a long-horizon task and the robot performs it right away. No fine-tuning, no retraining. Skild has released S1, a robot foundation model where you specify the task with a video demonstration instead of a language instruction. Why video, not language Language works for "hand me the mug." It falls apart for anything delicate or long-horizon. You don't learn to fold a fitted sheet from a sentence. So S1 takes a video demo into its context window and translates it to its own body and scene. What it does - Tasks up to 10 minutes, dozens of sequential steps - Unseen tasks: potting plants, pour-over coffee, kit assembly, pancakes. Skild says even the underlying primitives, like flipping a pancake, weren't in pre-training - Recovers from its own mistakes without being trained to - Improves on flawed demos. Demonstrator drops an egg, S1 doesn't make that mistake. It reads the demo as a goal, not a trajectory to copy.

The Humanoid Hub

19,034 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Robot AI brains, aka Vision-Language-Action models, cannot adapt to new tasks as easily as LLMs like Gemini, ChatGPT, or Grok. LLMs can adapt quickly with their in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. But can we inject ICL abilities into a pre-trained VLA like pi0? Yes! Introducing RICL (Retraining for In-Context Learning), our Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2025 paper. Our RICL-pi0 model can adapt to unseen objects, novel motions, and new scenes with just ICL and RAG (retrieval-augmented generation). RICL-pi0 also boosts performance on the long-tail of tasks. A quick 1 minute video summary:

Robot AI brains, aka Vision-Language-Action models, cannot adapt to new tasks as easily as LLMs like Gemini, ChatGPT, or Grok. LLMs can adapt quickly with their in-context learning (ICL) capabilities. But can we inject ICL abilities into a pre-trained VLA like pi0? Yes! Introducing RICL (Retraining for In-Context Learning), our Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) 2025 paper. Our RICL-pi0 model can adapt to unseen objects, novel motions, and new scenes with just ICL and RAG (retrieval-augmented generation). RICL-pi0 also boosts performance on the long-tail of tasks. A quick 1 minute video summary:

Kaustubh Sridhar

52,897 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Robots are getting smarter, but most still fail the same way. They don’t learn from their own mistakes. A new paper proposes something different: a way for robots to self-improve directly from their failures in the real world. It’s called PLD (Probe, Learn, Distill). The idea: instead of collecting endless human demos, let the robot figure out where it fails, learn how to recover, and then distill that knowledge back into its main model. Key takeaways from the research: ✅ Uses residual reinforcement learning to recover from policy failures ✅ Achieves 99% success on LIBERO and 100% on real Franka and YAM arms ✅ Runs hour-long manipulation tasks without human resets ✅ Builds a feedback loop between real-world data and model adaptation Unlike supervised fine-tuning, which relies on humans, PLD learns from the robot’s own experience. By training on its own failure distribution, the model becomes both more efficient and more aligned with the real world. It’s not just a technical shift, it’s a step toward robots that improve themselves through real-world practice. Thanks for sharing, Wenli Xiao !! Paper and demos: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Robots are getting smarter, but most still fail the same way. They don’t learn from their own mistakes. A new paper proposes something different: a way for robots to self-improve directly from their failures in the real world. It’s called PLD (Probe, Learn, Distill). The idea: instead of collecting endless human demos, let the robot figure out where it fails, learn how to recover, and then distill that knowledge back into its main model. Key takeaways from the research: ✅ Uses residual reinforcement learning to recover from policy failures ✅ Achieves 99% success on LIBERO and 100% on real Franka and YAM arms ✅ Runs hour-long manipulation tasks without human resets ✅ Builds a feedback loop between real-world data and model adaptation Unlike supervised fine-tuning, which relies on humans, PLD learns from the robot’s own experience. By training on its own failure distribution, the model becomes both more efficient and more aligned with the real world. It’s not just a technical shift, it’s a step toward robots that improve themselves through real-world practice. Thanks for sharing, Wenli Xiao !! Paper and demos: —- Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

22,891 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Not the flashiest demos, but what’s under the hood represents a foundational shift for general-purpose robotics. World models are the next-gen foundation of Physical AI, not the VLM backbones found in typical VLAs. DreamZero is a 14B-parameter World Action Model (WAM) by NVIDIA that treats robotics as a joint video-and-action prediction task. Unlike traditional Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models that map images directly to motor commands, DreamZero leverages a pretrained video diffusion backbone to predict future world states and actions simultaneously. - achieves 2× better zero-shot generalization to unseen tasks and environments compared to state-of-the-art VLAs. - learns effectively from heterogeneous, non-repetitive data (500 hours), breaking the need for thousands of repeated demonstrations. - adapts to new robot embodiments with just 30 minutes of play data. - enables 7Hz closed-loop control via system optimizations and "DreamZero-Flash," making high-capacity diffusion models viable for real-time use.

Not the flashiest demos, but what’s under the hood represents a foundational shift for general-purpose robotics. World models are the next-gen foundation of Physical AI, not the VLM backbones found in typical VLAs. DreamZero is a 14B-parameter World Action Model (WAM) by NVIDIA that treats robotics as a joint video-and-action prediction task. Unlike traditional Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models that map images directly to motor commands, DreamZero leverages a pretrained video diffusion backbone to predict future world states and actions simultaneously. - achieves 2× better zero-shot generalization to unseen tasks and environments compared to state-of-the-art VLAs. - learns effectively from heterogeneous, non-repetitive data (500 hours), breaking the need for thousands of repeated demonstrations. - adapts to new robot embodiments with just 30 minutes of play data. - enables 7Hz closed-loop control via system optimizations and "DreamZero-Flash," making high-capacity diffusion models viable for real-time use.

The Humanoid Hub

35,364 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

One of the biggest surprises in AI over the last few years has been how well coding agents generalize beyond software. In a recent essay, MIT professor Philip Isola argued that we may be entering the era of robot-use agents: general-purpose models that can control different robots, write policies, and learn new physical tasks with little or no robot-specific training. In this episode of Decoded, we're joined by the founders of Waddle Labs and Robocurve PBC, two of the startups whose work helped drive this realization. They're working at the frontier of using general-purpose models to control robots, and their recent demos helped inspire the growing conversation around robot-use agents. Together, we dig into the research behind that idea, from code-as-policies and vision-language-action models to the harnesses and evals needed to make these systems work in the real world. 00:00 — What Are Robot-Use Agents? 02:11 — From Vision-Language-Action Models to General LLMs 04:07 — The Bitter Lesson for Robotics 07:04 — How Coding Agents Learned to Control Robots 10:41 — How Robots Learn From Experience 14:22 — The Harness as a Form of Robot Intelligence 16:14 — Watching Astra Control a Robot 20:55 — Why General Models May Win in Robotics 26:05 — How Close Are General-Purpose Robots?

One of the biggest surprises in AI over the last few years has been how well coding agents generalize beyond software. In a recent essay, MIT professor Philip Isola argued that we may be entering the era of robot-use agents: general-purpose models that can control different robots, write policies, and learn new physical tasks with little or no robot-specific training. In this episode of Decoded, we're joined by the founders of Waddle Labs and Robocurve PBC, two of the startups whose work helped drive this realization. They're working at the frontier of using general-purpose models to control robots, and their recent demos helped inspire the growing conversation around robot-use agents. Together, we dig into the research behind that idea, from code-as-policies and vision-language-action models to the harnesses and evals needed to make these systems work in the real world. 00:00 — What Are Robot-Use Agents? 02:11 — From Vision-Language-Action Models to General LLMs 04:07 — The Bitter Lesson for Robotics 07:04 — How Coding Agents Learned to Control Robots 10:41 — How Robots Learn From Experience 14:22 — The Harness as a Form of Robot Intelligence 16:14 — Watching Astra Control a Robot 20:55 — Why General Models May Win in Robotics 26:05 — How Close Are General-Purpose Robots?

Y Combinator

93,369 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Robots might learn better from video than from language! 📼 Most Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models learn what to do from text, but still struggle with how things move in the real world. That makes them data-hungry and slow to train. mimic video takes a different route. Instead of grounding robot control in text, it grounds it in video, using large pre-trained video models that already capture physical motion and dynamics. The idea is straightforward: let the video model handle “what will happen next,” and let a smaller control model focus only on turning that visual plan into robot actions. The result is big gains in practice. Robots trained this way need 10× less data, converge twice as fast, and perform better on both simulated benchmarks and real bimanual manipulation tasks. If robots can “imagine” motion using video, control becomes a much simpler problem. Shoutout to Jonas Pai, Liam Achenbach, Oier Mees, Elvis Nava and the rest of the team! Here's the project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Robots might learn better from video than from language! 📼 Most Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models learn what to do from text, but still struggle with how things move in the real world. That makes them data-hungry and slow to train. mimic video takes a different route. Instead of grounding robot control in text, it grounds it in video, using large pre-trained video models that already capture physical motion and dynamics. The idea is straightforward: let the video model handle “what will happen next,” and let a smaller control model focus only on turning that visual plan into robot actions. The result is big gains in practice. Robots trained this way need 10× less data, converge twice as fast, and perform better on both simulated benchmarks and real bimanual manipulation tasks. If robots can “imagine” motion using video, control becomes a much simpler problem. Shoutout to Jonas Pai, Liam Achenbach, Oier Mees, Elvis Nava and the rest of the team! Here's the project page: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

50,130 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

A team tested Pi0, Pi0 Fast, Gr00t, and ACT on real robot arms in manufacturing tasks. (🔖 Bookmark this for later!) The task was precise: place thin rectangular frames from a messy stack into a holder. The team fine-tuned each model on 100 real trajectories and compared training time, inference speed, motion quality, and success rates. ⬇️ Here’s a breakdown of what they found Pi0 (Original) ✅ Strongest overall performance in precise pick-and-place ✅ High success rate even in edge cases ✅ Longest training time (~11 hours, ~$30 per run) ✅ Inference time of 80 ms causes short pauses between actions Despite delays, it handles complex scenarios well… solid for high-precision tasks, but slow to train. Gr00t ✅ Trains fast (~2 hours, ~$5 per run) ✅ Performs almost as well as Pi0 on large-object tasks ✅ Struggles with fine precision; random movement in some trials ✅ More training didn’t fix jitter or random offsets Best suited for tasks where exact precision isn’t critical. Not ready for manufacturing-grade accuracy without more tuning. Pi0 Fast ✅ Promised faster training, but results were underwhelming ✅ Training at 6 hours still showed low success rates ✅ Inference was slower than expected ✅ Not reliable for generalizing even slightly new tasks Currently too unstable for real-world deployment. Doesn’t live up to the “Fast” name yet. ACT (Baseline) ✅ 200MB model—lightweight, but limited ✅ Struggles with stacked objects or ambiguous scenes ✅ Success rates around 70% in best-case setups ✅ Can’t match newer models on precision or generalization Still a solid baseline, but clearly a generation behind in robustness. 🚨 Extra Notes All newer models share a common issue: •Inference takes longer than a frame (80 ms vs 33 ms), so robots “pause” between chunks. •This results in jittery movements, but not a dealbreaker unless tasks are time-sensitive. Language-conditioned tasks also fell short: after training on two labeled tasks, the model couldn’t generalize to a third unseen combination using only text prompts. ✅ The good news? These models adapt well to new robot arms with quick fine-tuning. ❌ The bad news? There’s still no plug-and-play solution for improving performance after deployment. Reinforcement learning or DAgger-style data collection during real-world operation may be the next big step, something many teams in robotics are actively working on.

A team tested Pi0, Pi0 Fast, Gr00t, and ACT on real robot arms in manufacturing tasks. (🔖 Bookmark this for later!) The task was precise: place thin rectangular frames from a messy stack into a holder. The team fine-tuned each model on 100 real trajectories and compared training time, inference speed, motion quality, and success rates. ⬇️ Here’s a breakdown of what they found Pi0 (Original) ✅ Strongest overall performance in precise pick-and-place ✅ High success rate even in edge cases ✅ Longest training time (~11 hours, ~$30 per run) ✅ Inference time of 80 ms causes short pauses between actions Despite delays, it handles complex scenarios well… solid for high-precision tasks, but slow to train. Gr00t ✅ Trains fast (~2 hours, ~$5 per run) ✅ Performs almost as well as Pi0 on large-object tasks ✅ Struggles with fine precision; random movement in some trials ✅ More training didn’t fix jitter or random offsets Best suited for tasks where exact precision isn’t critical. Not ready for manufacturing-grade accuracy without more tuning. Pi0 Fast ✅ Promised faster training, but results were underwhelming ✅ Training at 6 hours still showed low success rates ✅ Inference was slower than expected ✅ Not reliable for generalizing even slightly new tasks Currently too unstable for real-world deployment. Doesn’t live up to the “Fast” name yet. ACT (Baseline) ✅ 200MB model—lightweight, but limited ✅ Struggles with stacked objects or ambiguous scenes ✅ Success rates around 70% in best-case setups ✅ Can’t match newer models on precision or generalization Still a solid baseline, but clearly a generation behind in robustness. 🚨 Extra Notes All newer models share a common issue: •Inference takes longer than a frame (80 ms vs 33 ms), so robots “pause” between chunks. •This results in jittery movements, but not a dealbreaker unless tasks are time-sensitive. Language-conditioned tasks also fell short: after training on two labeled tasks, the model couldn’t generalize to a third unseen combination using only text prompts. ✅ The good news? These models adapt well to new robot arms with quick fine-tuning. ❌ The bad news? There’s still no plug-and-play solution for improving performance after deployment. Reinforcement learning or DAgger-style data collection during real-world operation may be the next big step, something many teams in robotics are actively working on.

Ilir Aliu

21,844 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The next evolution: VLA+ models Just yesterday Microsoft Research released Rho-alpha (ρα) – their first robotics model, built on the Phi family. While most Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models stop at vision and language, Rho-alpha adds: ▪️ Tactile sensing to feel objects during manipulation ▪️ Online learning that lets it improve from human corrections (via teleoperation, 3D mouse or other tools) in real-time even after deployment. Both these sides make adaptability central rather than incidental. Microsoft calls it a VLA+ model, positioning it as an extension beyond what current VLA systems support. ➡️ Today Rho-alpha can control dual-arm robot setups to perform tasks such as: • Manipulating the BusyBox following natural-language instructions • Plug insertion • Toolbox packing and object arrangement with bimanual coordination But to understand why this "plus" matters, we need to understand what came before. Here, we'll take you through the entire landscape of VLA models – Gemini Robotics, π0, SmolVLA, Helix, ACoT-VLA and others:

The next evolution: VLA+ models Just yesterday Microsoft Research released Rho-alpha (ρα) – their first robotics model, built on the Phi family. While most Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models stop at vision and language, Rho-alpha adds: ▪️ Tactile sensing to feel objects during manipulation ▪️ Online learning that lets it improve from human corrections (via teleoperation, 3D mouse or other tools) in real-time even after deployment. Both these sides make adaptability central rather than incidental. Microsoft calls it a VLA+ model, positioning it as an extension beyond what current VLA systems support. ➡️ Today Rho-alpha can control dual-arm robot setups to perform tasks such as: • Manipulating the BusyBox following natural-language instructions • Plug insertion • Toolbox packing and object arrangement with bimanual coordination But to understand why this "plus" matters, we need to understand what came before. Here, we'll take you through the entire landscape of VLA models – Gemini Robotics, π0, SmolVLA, Helix, ACoT-VLA and others:

Turing Post

62,494 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Are you kidding me??? It grasps multiple objects with different ways, all at once with… a single hand??? No pauses. 1x speed. GENE-26.5 is Genesis AI’s robotics-native multimodal foundation model. It’s trained on 200,000+ hours of real human hand data (motion, force, touch) and runs on a 54-DoF bimanual system: Scaling that human data 4x lifted real-robot success rates from 16.6% to 65.6% on long-horizon dexterous tasks!! Same model weights, zero fine-tuning for this exact sequence. You know those tiny coordinated movements you do without thinking…? Robots couldn’t reliably do that before. Now they can. Today. This is the video you’ll send to my friends, outside of our bubble, when they say “robots are still just demos.” Congrats to the entire team around Zhou Xian! Credit: Seen at Zu Wang (Zu) Genesis official announcement for the full story + longer demo: ——— Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Are you kidding me??? It grasps multiple objects with different ways, all at once with… a single hand??? No pauses. 1x speed. GENE-26.5 is Genesis AI’s robotics-native multimodal foundation model. It’s trained on 200,000+ hours of real human hand data (motion, force, touch) and runs on a 54-DoF bimanual system: Scaling that human data 4x lifted real-robot success rates from 16.6% to 65.6% on long-horizon dexterous tasks!! Same model weights, zero fine-tuning for this exact sequence. You know those tiny coordinated movements you do without thinking…? Robots couldn’t reliably do that before. Now they can. Today. This is the video you’ll send to my friends, outside of our bubble, when they say “robots are still just demos.” Congrats to the entire team around Zhou Xian! Credit: Seen at Zu Wang (Zu) Genesis official announcement for the full story + longer demo: ——— Weekly robotics and AI insights. Subscribe free:

Ilir Aliu

204,737 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Most video-action robot models are a content-creation video generator with an action module attached. LingBot-VA 2.0 from Robbyant, a video-action foundation model, throws that starting point out and trains the whole stack natively for control. And it runs closed-loop at a peak 225 Hz. It's so important because A robot cannot move responsively when its controller pauses to imagine the next few frames. LingBot-VA 2.0 predicts during execution, then corrects using each real observation. And it carries only about 13B video parameters while activating roughly 1.9B per token. Bigger robot models usually mean slower reactions, creating a direct conflict between intelligence and control. LingBot-VA 2.0 is trained from scratch for robot control rather than adapted from a video generator built for content creation. Robbyant, an embodied AI company under Ant Group, built it to learn how scenes change under actions, predict what should happen next, and turn those predictions into real-time robot movements. Most video-action systems inherit a tokenizer and video backbone trained mainly to reproduce visual appearance. LingBot-VA 2.0 rebuilds both parts around physical control. Its semantic visual-action tokenizer maps observations toward features from a frozen vision foundation model and learns compact latent actions from frame-to-frame changes using self-supervised inverse and forward dynamics. Unlabeled web video can therefore carry action-relevant training signals without robot action labels. The policy is causal from the start, so every prediction can use only past observations. Its sparse Mixture-of-Experts video backbone has about 13B total parameters, while about 1.9B are active per token, keeping the compute lower during each step. A high-level vision-language planner breaks long tasks into smaller instructions, while the low-level video-action policy handles continuous movement. Foresight Reasoning predicts future visual states while the robot is already acting, then replaces imagined states with every new real observation. Combined with few-step distillation and systems acceleration, the paper reports a peak asynchronous execution frequency of 225 Hz. The model adapts from 10–15 demonstrations, transfers across robot embodiments, and handles some new tasks zero-shot. In the paper’s own evaluations, it reaches 93.6 average on RoboTwin 2.0 and reports stronger real-world results than LingBot-VA and π0.5 across the tested tasks. 🧵 1.

Most video-action robot models are a content-creation video generator with an action module attached. LingBot-VA 2.0 from Robbyant, a video-action foundation model, throws that starting point out and trains the whole stack natively for control. And it runs closed-loop at a peak 225 Hz. It's so important because A robot cannot move responsively when its controller pauses to imagine the next few frames. LingBot-VA 2.0 predicts during execution, then corrects using each real observation. And it carries only about 13B video parameters while activating roughly 1.9B per token. Bigger robot models usually mean slower reactions, creating a direct conflict between intelligence and control. LingBot-VA 2.0 is trained from scratch for robot control rather than adapted from a video generator built for content creation. Robbyant, an embodied AI company under Ant Group, built it to learn how scenes change under actions, predict what should happen next, and turn those predictions into real-time robot movements. Most video-action systems inherit a tokenizer and video backbone trained mainly to reproduce visual appearance. LingBot-VA 2.0 rebuilds both parts around physical control. Its semantic visual-action tokenizer maps observations toward features from a frozen vision foundation model and learns compact latent actions from frame-to-frame changes using self-supervised inverse and forward dynamics. Unlabeled web video can therefore carry action-relevant training signals without robot action labels. The policy is causal from the start, so every prediction can use only past observations. Its sparse Mixture-of-Experts video backbone has about 13B total parameters, while about 1.9B are active per token, keeping the compute lower during each step. A high-level vision-language planner breaks long tasks into smaller instructions, while the low-level video-action policy handles continuous movement. Foresight Reasoning predicts future visual states while the robot is already acting, then replaces imagined states with every new real observation. Combined with few-step distillation and systems acceleration, the paper reports a peak asynchronous execution frequency of 225 Hz. The model adapts from 10–15 demonstrations, transfers across robot embodiments, and handles some new tasks zero-shot. In the paper’s own evaluations, it reaches 93.6 average on RoboTwin 2.0 and reports stronger real-world results than LingBot-VA and π0.5 across the tested tasks. 🧵 1.

Rohan Paul

11,253 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Introducing Contrastive Language Model (CLM): an ultra-fast System One Model trained with a contrastive learning objective that connects states and actions. CLM-8B is pre-trained on internet-scale data and delivers up to 9× faster inference than Jev ⚡ while achieving comparable performance across computer-use, gaming, and tool-calling tasks. With lightweight fine-tuning, CLM-8B sets a new SOTA on challenging agentic coding benchmarks, such as DeepSWE (81.6%) and Terminal-Bench 2.1 (87.6%). In contrast, Jev fails to serve as an effective verifier for these long-horizon tasks. We also build an efficient training and serving infra for CLMs by disaggregating states and actions, allowing their embeddings to be cached and reused independently. This substantially reduces inference latency in settings where the state evolves continuously while the action set remains fixed. Finally, we establish scaling laws for CLMs and show that the test contrastive loss decreases predictably as a power law in training compute, model size, and dataset size. 📄 Blog: 💻 Code: 🗣️ Discord: 🤗 Data & Models: More details on CLM’s architecture, data recipe, and scaling laws in the thread below 🧵

Introducing Contrastive Language Model (CLM): an ultra-fast System One Model trained with a contrastive learning objective that connects states and actions. CLM-8B is pre-trained on internet-scale data and delivers up to 9× faster inference than Jev ⚡ while achieving comparable performance across computer-use, gaming, and tool-calling tasks. With lightweight fine-tuning, CLM-8B sets a new SOTA on challenging agentic coding benchmarks, such as DeepSWE (81.6%) and Terminal-Bench 2.1 (87.6%). In contrast, Jev fails to serve as an effective verifier for these long-horizon tasks. We also build an efficient training and serving infra for CLMs by disaggregating states and actions, allowing their embeddings to be cached and reused independently. This substantially reduces inference latency in settings where the state evolves continuously while the action set remains fixed. Finally, we establish scaling laws for CLMs and show that the test contrastive loss decreases predictably as a power law in training compute, model size, and dataset size. 📄 Blog: 💻 Code: 🗣️ Discord: 🤗 Data & Models: More details on CLM’s architecture, data recipe, and scaling laws in the thread below 🧵

Jacky Kwok @ COLM 2026

1,058,720 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

🚨 BREAKING: Microsoft's first robotics foundation model! 🤯 Microsoft just announced Rho-alpha (ρα), their first robotics model derived from the Phi series of vision-language models. Rho-alpha translates natural language commands into control signals for robotic systems performing bimanual manipulation tasks. Commands like "push the green button with the right gripper," "pull out the red wire," "flip the top switch on," or "turn the knob to position 5" get executed directly by dual-arm robots. What makes this different from standard vision-language-action (VLA) models is the additional modalities. Rho-alpha is a VLA+ model that adds tactile sensing to the perceptual mix, with plans to incorporate force feedback. On the learning side, the model is designed to continually improve during deployment by learning from human feedback. The training approach combines trajectories from physical demonstrations and simulated tasks with web-scale visual question answering data. Since teleoperation data is scarce and expensive, Microsoft is using NVIDIA Isaac Sim on Azure to generate physically accurate synthetic datasets via reinforcement learning. These simulated trajectories get combined with commercial and open physical demonstration datasets. The model is currently under evaluation on dual-arm setups and humanoid robots. Microsoft is opening an Early Access Program for organizations interested in evaluating Rho-alpha. Robots that can adapt to dynamic situations and human preferences are more useful in real environments and more trusted by the people operating them. Read more here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

🚨 BREAKING: Microsoft's first robotics foundation model! 🤯 Microsoft just announced Rho-alpha (ρα), their first robotics model derived from the Phi series of vision-language models. Rho-alpha translates natural language commands into control signals for robotic systems performing bimanual manipulation tasks. Commands like "push the green button with the right gripper," "pull out the red wire," "flip the top switch on," or "turn the knob to position 5" get executed directly by dual-arm robots. What makes this different from standard vision-language-action (VLA) models is the additional modalities. Rho-alpha is a VLA+ model that adds tactile sensing to the perceptual mix, with plans to incorporate force feedback. On the learning side, the model is designed to continually improve during deployment by learning from human feedback. The training approach combines trajectories from physical demonstrations and simulated tasks with web-scale visual question answering data. Since teleoperation data is scarce and expensive, Microsoft is using NVIDIA Isaac Sim on Azure to generate physically accurate synthetic datasets via reinforcement learning. These simulated trajectories get combined with commercial and open physical demonstration datasets. The model is currently under evaluation on dual-arm setups and humanoid robots. Microsoft is opening an Early Access Program for organizations interested in evaluating Rho-alpha. Robots that can adapt to dynamic situations and human preferences are more useful in real environments and more trusted by the people operating them. Read more here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

61,071 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Don't waste 2 years figuring out AI on your own in 2026. a free GitHub repo from Microsoft with 56,200 stars just gave out the entire framework to master "AI Engineering in 2026" In only 12 weeks. You can go from 0 % →100 % [ here is how to do that] 4% → Introduction and History of AI 8% → Knowledge Representation and Expert Systems 13% → Perceptron 17% → Multi-Layered Perceptron and Creating Your Own Framework 21% → Intro to Frameworks (PyTorch/TensorFlow) and Overfitting 25% → Intro to Computer Vision, OpenCV 29% → Convolutional Neural Networks and CNN Architectures 33% → Pre-trained Networks, Transfer Learning and Training Tricks 38% → Autoencoders and VAEs 42% → Generative Adversarial Networks and Style Transfer 46% → Object Detection 50% → Semantic Segmentation, U-Net 54% → Text Representation, BoW/TF-IDF 58% → Semantic Word Embeddings, Word2Vec & GloVe 63% → Language Modeling, Training Your Own Embeddings 67% → Recurrent Neural Networks 71% → Generative Recurrent Networks 75% → Transformers and BERT 79% → Named Entity Recognition 83% → Large Language Models, Prompt Programming and Few-Shot Tasks 88% → Genetic Algorithms 92% → Deep Reinforcement Learning 96% → Multi-Agent Systems 100% → AI Ethics and Responsible AI it replaces 10 paid courses on agentic engineering. watch it today, then read the article below on how to generate alpha using graph engineering for hedge fund ↓

Don't waste 2 years figuring out AI on your own in 2026. a free GitHub repo from Microsoft with 56,200 stars just gave out the entire framework to master "AI Engineering in 2026" In only 12 weeks. You can go from 0 % →100 % [ here is how to do that] 4% → Introduction and History of AI 8% → Knowledge Representation and Expert Systems 13% → Perceptron 17% → Multi-Layered Perceptron and Creating Your Own Framework 21% → Intro to Frameworks (PyTorch/TensorFlow) and Overfitting 25% → Intro to Computer Vision, OpenCV 29% → Convolutional Neural Networks and CNN Architectures 33% → Pre-trained Networks, Transfer Learning and Training Tricks 38% → Autoencoders and VAEs 42% → Generative Adversarial Networks and Style Transfer 46% → Object Detection 50% → Semantic Segmentation, U-Net 54% → Text Representation, BoW/TF-IDF 58% → Semantic Word Embeddings, Word2Vec & GloVe 63% → Language Modeling, Training Your Own Embeddings 67% → Recurrent Neural Networks 71% → Generative Recurrent Networks 75% → Transformers and BERT 79% → Named Entity Recognition 83% → Large Language Models, Prompt Programming and Few-Shot Tasks 88% → Genetic Algorithms 92% → Deep Reinforcement Learning 96% → Multi-Agent Systems 100% → AI Ethics and Responsible AI it replaces 10 paid courses on agentic engineering. watch it today, then read the article below on how to generate alpha using graph engineering for hedge fund ↓

Avid

14,619 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten